Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2023/04

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
2023

01 April 2023

Reason: A lot of unregistered accounts are disrupting the article.

MNWiki845 (talk) 3:30, 31 March 2023 (IST)

Question: @MNWiki845: I don't see any obviously disruptive edits from IPs within the past 48 hours, can you be more specific and provide diffs? I don't see anything overwhelming enough to warrant page protection. Aoidh (talk) 10:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I love Alaska with all my heart, please protect it. 2601:5C7:4100:3600:F178:FE2D:AB4F:7AC (talk) 18:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Second pointless request today from 2601:5c7:4100:3600::/64. Favonian (talk) 18:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Prevent up vandal. NP83 (talk) 18:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 18:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Edit-warring by IP - on both this article and T-64, they have been reverted by 4 separate editors, but continue to reinstate their preferred version against consensus. Loafiewa (talk) 14:31, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 199.7.156.0/23 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the two articles for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 21:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long-term abuse. 109.98.208.44 (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Continued disruption by ip addresses after unprotection; perhaps encouraged by the subject [1]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 00:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs trying to remove criticism, white wash the page. CT55555(talk) 17:57, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not sure pc is needed at this time, though. El_C 04:17, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. PopoDameron ⁠talk 18:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple drive-by unsourced/likely incorrect changes to cast listing by IPs and new accounts, possibly socks of 'SuperSharanya'. Film is planned to be released in January 2024. Would be helpful to get semi-protection through that month.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 19:00, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring by editor refusing to get consensus on the talk page for disputed content (they're currently at 3RR). There's also been blanket restoring of WP:RSP listed problem sources as part of this. KoA (talk) 19:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Note: Page has been nominated for deletion; maybe we should let that play out. Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
That was my initial thought too, though the escalation at the page has gotten pretty bad with the RSP-related sources and ignoring the talk page going on. If problems are going to continue, it'd probably be apparent within the next 12 hours, so it would be helpful for folks to keep an eye out. Just a 24-48 hour protection with that AfD is going on could help settle down the reverting too. KoA (talk) 22:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Johnuniq. El_C 04:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Almost certain to attract vandalism. Brad (talk) 21:29, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. I nearly always decline preemptive protection requests, but I am granting this one and setting its duration not to expire (which does not mean infinite, however). Noting, though, that this is the first preemptive protection I've made in 2023, after having made none in 2022, and only one in 2021 (Jill Biden from none to indef semi upon Joe Biden assuming the presidency). El_C 04:04, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content from multiple editors. GiantSnowman 17:38, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Magnolia677 (talk · contribs) has immediately returned to his/her behaviour of deleting content once the protection expired - despite efforts to address his/her concerns. Reported at 3RR but protection would stop this tendentious behaviour. 10mmsocket (talk) 22:27, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

  • This looks like an instance where WP:Boomerang should be applied. It completely misrepresents what is going on in the article. Magnolia667's inquiry about the use of unreliable sources in the article at RSN was validated, not rejected. There is nothing improper about removing unsourced text - that's how BRD is supposed to work. Edit warring to restore unsourced and unreliably sourced text without any effort to discuss it - which is what 10mmsocket has repeatedly done on this article, on the other hand, is a sanctionable problem. Banks Irk (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Not done. OP Warned. 10mmsocket, you cannot insist on including unsourced content, even with {{cn}} attached, once its verifiability had been objected to. The WP:BURDEN, indeed, is on you. El_C 03:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced information in violation of WP:BLP. Actualcpscm (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. El_C 03:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 01:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. High levels of recent WP:POV pushing by IP editors and editors with very low edit counts. Top5a (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 04:22, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
The vandalism keeps persisting from IP users who do not engage elsewhere on Wikipedia. They (perhaps even the same actual person) edit the page from a random IP, and then disappear. This is why I requested semi-protection, as there is no way in which to engage on these users. The Talk page is a clear no Wikipedia:Consensus, and these IP users keep engaging in Wikipedia:POVPUSH, when the article is about as balanced as it can be (utilizing all the sources). Over half the sources clearly use the term that is in dispute. Top5a (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps restoring unsourced material due to April fools. Armegon (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs and newly registered editors. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 05:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of anonymous disruptive edits. Chronikhiles (talk) 07:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by various IPs and newly registered users that continued the moment the page protection expired. Turaids (talk) 08:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: As the owners of the business that this page is about, Polarr, Inc, we want to be able to freely edit the page with significant company updates.

The account that we are submitting this request from is owned by the Head of Operations of the company, Polarr. Polarrinc (talk) 04:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined. Because you have a conflict of interest, you need to make edit requests on the talk page rather than editing the article directly—see Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide for more information. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefenite extended confirmed protection: So no-one can edit it except users that want to add elements (autoconfirmed can edit, not autoconfirmed need to place an edit request on the talk page). Diiinall (talk) 09:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not a valid reason for protecting. Favonian (talk) 10:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined and page deleted. Please use the sandbox to experiment with editing features. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 10:16, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Stop ip vandalism. NP83 (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Blocked sockpuppeteer User:Kirat sinh is back, anonymously stuffing the same unsourced claims into this article, after being reverted and blocked by User:Ponyo. 2A00:23EE:1748:BEC6:B802:4FF:FE8E:A76C (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ponyobons mots 14:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I would like to request to protect this page from editing and would like to be a administrator for this page as I created this on behalf of Masjid Rahmaniya. Sahe Alam 12:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: Left requestor a note about WP:COI -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason, this talk page has been a consistent target of disruptive editing by the most random IPs. I know talk pages are rarely protected, but so far this entire year there hasn't been a single discussion, only reverts. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 75.33.254.53 (talk) 15:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

This is a highly biased and partisan synopsis based in ideology at the expense of actual empirical data. It’s abhorrent, and false and wikipedia should be ashamed of protecting such hateful falsities on its platform. I request that the protections be removed immediately.

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editor keeps adding unsourced claims to the page. O.N.R. (talk) 18:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Question: Old Naval Rooftops, they've now added a source, does it suffice? El_C 04:09, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
No, it doesn't; the source specifically states "among the teams with no geographic interleague rivals", which contradicts the claim the IP editor is trying to make. O.N.R. (talk) 10:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Yuugone (talk) 06:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP and new editors having April fool's fun with a BLP. Schazjmd (talk) 20:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Page getting a lot of vandalism today. Nick Levine (talk) 12:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. for three days. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 19:58, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Puerto Rico TV station articles (3rd time)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive editing by IP hoppers. This is getting out of hand. Look at the edit histories. Won't anyone do something this time? Also pinging @Sammi Brie:. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 20:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected except for WELU, there I do not see any recent disruption.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

02 April 2023

Reason: High level of vandalism and misinformation. Tellisavas (talk) 08:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated disruptions from non-registered users. Persistent POV pushing from registered users. Reo kwon (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem to have been much activity today. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent LTA target. Magitroopa (talk) 17:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined not enough recent vandalism and the range has been blocked. No reason to protect. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:39, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Bholaa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: A lot of unregistered IPs are damaging the article. Creating vandalism in the article.

User:MNWiki845 (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC) 10:09, 1 April 2023 (IST)

Already protected by administrator MaterialscientistMelanieN (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistant vandalism – IP editors constantly removing reliably sourced material. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 00:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. This talk page has been consistently vandalized, including people occasionally mistaking it for an interface to a chatbot. PopoDameron ⁠talk 19:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, there has been some vandalism, but not a lot, and we are usually reluctant to protect talk pages unless they are really out of control. MelanieN (talk) 01:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism, having to constantly change incorrect information and information that has no source. Jamisonsupame (talk) 01:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 03:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. The page and article were protected by User:SlimVirgin in May 2010 when the subject was alive, due to unsourced article changes. The talk page had no significant activity at the time. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 22:03, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. The article and its talk page were protected (as a redirect) in November 2016 before the film was announced. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:47, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Engr. Smitty Werben 22:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. soibangla (talk) 22:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 09:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 23:23, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism (maybe temporary ECP per WP:ARBBLP and WP:ARBCOVID too, or at least semi-protect it). Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 23:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Is anyone actually looking at this page? Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 09:16, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent long term vandalism by IPs. UtoD 23:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:34, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparent LTA targeting article. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism, indef semi. Thiscouldbeauser (talk) 02:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Protection just expired a few days ago and it's already gotten a ton of spam since. PopoDameron ⁠talk 02:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has seen a spike in vandalism in the past couple days. –WPA (talk) 03:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 04:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. – 72 hours. If you want an admin to look into sockpuppetry, please give more information. EdJohnston (talk) 04:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Ongoing use of talk page as a forum by IP editors to "report" facebook impersonation scams despite clear notices not to. Could we try protecting the talk page against IPs (ie Semi-protection) and see if that reduces the misusage of this page as a forum?. Zinnober9 (talk) 07:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Qwerfjkltalk 11:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. This page was protected indefinitely in March 2009 by User:Prioryman when it was apparently a battleground for Project Chanology. Unprotection of both the article and the talk page was discussed in April 2010, and the last apparent oversight action was in 2011. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 21:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Dennis Brown - 11:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. The page and article were protected in January 2011 after oversight actions on both. Since then the talk page has seen no activity. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 22:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Dennis Brown - 11:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason for protection. The page and article were protected by User:Shell Kinney in May 2010 following oversight actions on both. There has been little talk page activity since. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 23:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Done DanCherek (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:RSPHISTORY [2]. Triggered an edit filter(filter description: LTA edit summary or editing pattern hit). Rastinition (talk) 11:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Not only is someone (on multiple ips and one account) keeps adding unsubstantiated claims of the subject's cause of death, but their "sources" predate her death. $chnauzer 14:45, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I wanna change new climate 1991-2020 for Allahabad and I have a link to do that please.Putinstalin (talk) 07:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined No. You can use the {{Edit semi-protected}} template on the article's talkpage. Bishonen | tålk 12:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. BangJan1999 14:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – persistent vandalism in favor of pro-conspiracy WP:POV editing: [3][4][5][6][7]. — Shibbolethink ( ) 15:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Highly contentious topic (also designated as such by ArbCom), In started the article 20 minutes ago, and we already had three non-constructive and zero constructive IP edits (all from different IPs). Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Done, it went out of hand and I applied extended confirmed protection. Feel free to amend if you think it is appropriate.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#My protection of Vladlen Tatarsky, just in case.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected Unprotected and reprotected for unambiguous application and no charge possible of INVOLVEment .Courcelles (talk) 18:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A lot of unregistered accounts are vandalizing the article and adding irrelevant information. <span style="backgroun d:#444;padding:2px 12px;font-size:12px">[[User:Tousif.15| <span (talk) 14:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Wrong section. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 18:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Long term edit war. Couple of editors trying to implement a major change without any consensus. Long term edit war that started with this edit - 1 . Razer(talk) 18:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 20:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Greek alphabet characters

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. All were protected by User:Future Perfect at Sunrise in August 2010 due to persistent vandalism, and that admin's user talk page is also semi-protected. These don't seem like the kind of topics that would attract ongoing disruption. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – They may not seem like the kind of topics that would attract ongoing disruption, but they were favorite targets of an LTA, who is still around. Favonian (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

03 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not entirely sure why but it seems a vandal adding G5 tags to this page has come back. While the vandal is blocked, it seems for some reason this page is a target for speedy deletion tagging vandalism as it's happened twice in a week. TartarTorte 15:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: An IP editor has been edit-warring to restore dubious and unreliably-sourced claims, despite being reverted by several experienced editors. The IP changes periodically, so blocking alone doesn't work. A. Parrot (talk) 23:40, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 23:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: To determine whether protection remains necessary. This page was protected in January 2012 after a BLP oversight action. Since then there has been little talk page activity. User:Jclemens is no longer an admin. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected No valid reason to reopen this can of abuse. Courcelles (talk) 18:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page should be protected from vandalism Virander Sirohi (talk) 17:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 21:02, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: Article has been indefinitely semi-protected for almost 12 years, with no previous protection history outside of the 2010 pending changes trial. Protecting admin is no longer active. Conifer (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected Minimal page views; no evidence of why it was protected in the first place — Maile (talk) 00:18, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: The vandalism that prompted this protection is no longer active. TPs should not be protected for years without a good reason. Laser brain is no longer an admin. (t · c) buidhe 04:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected This article has been used as a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. — Maile (talk) 00:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 21:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 23:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 21:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:51, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Under Arts and entertainment, someone keeps adding "Good drawing," which has no basis to be on this dab AugustusAudax (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP address adding wrong Infor. Monhiroe (talk) 00:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blanking. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 01:31, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ...the data is not accurate therefore should be edited .... . Kmart capoli (talk) 20:12, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment: How can there be innaccurate data when there isn't even an article? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 20:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. No article under this title, or a reasonable permutation of it, seems to exist. (This is also something that we wouldn't have an article on in the first place, I feel, for being redundant with articles on regions.) —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:08, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – no article by this name exists, and none of us can determine which article the requester intended. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: LTA by IP from Italy, began in October 2022, had two protections so far, they are active on other tower pages. GreenC 18:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP additions of vandalism, unsourced nonsense, etc. over the span of weeks. Nswix (talk) 18:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Currently on the main page and receiving IP vandalism. 31-hour semi-protection should stop the disruption. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Long-term abuse: Piermark/HoY. theinstantmatrix (talk) 23:57, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:43, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been consistently vandalized over the past year. Yeehaw45 (talk) 05:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent vandalism throughout the past year. Yeehaw45 (talk) 05:58, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism and violations of established consensus at a low level by IPs over a long period of time. Tollens (talk) 08:13, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected--Ymblanter (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. --Karim talk to me :)..! 08:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I do not believe Marjorie Taylor Greene should be listed as a "Far Right Radicalism" She was a respected Congresswoman and if "radical" means supporting a past President, then the verbiage used against her is wrong. I wish to add some Conservative, positive, text to her page. Many Conservatives, 75%, view her as only a prominent voice for our U.S. Constitution. The current case against President Trump has seen many prominent lawyers and even guests on CNN saying the case is too political. Marjorie has fought hard against issues such as this. I hope you allow me to add some rebuttal arguments to the characterization of her actions. I have donated to Wikipedia many times. I use your site often. I am politically independent. I do not pick sides. I believe both parties have done some good. But I also believe both parties have done some wrong. Thank you for considering my request. Michael Belecky HanSulu (talk) 03:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done There is no such page,and this is not the place to discuss content. Acroterion (talk) 03:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: A new user that registered yesterday keeps on making disruptive edits in the plot section of the article. Probably going to need temporary semi-protection for this. Edwordo13 (talk) 17:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – While the other editor appears to be a new user, this looks to be a good faith dispute. Perhaps a non-templated word or two on the user's talk page might help. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 20:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated article hijacking. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 18:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of nea, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. After the back and forth yesterday, nothing. Daniel Case (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 05:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. As WP:GENSEX. El_C 11:09, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Either "Pending changes protection" or "Semi-protection" to prevent reverts from IP. The pages has already been through a discussion for delete and kept and the page is now just being reverted rather than good faith edits from IPs. K.Nevelsteen (talk) 08:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This is one of many alternative titles for this same subject, some of the others are already protected but this apparently is still open. Please protect it now, thanks. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:47, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Not sure how the previous indef salt got undone, but re- Done. El_C 11:25, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Odd editing tests from IPs. Could go with semi or pending changes. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 11:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Silly sockpuppetry editing. Semi-protect until they get bored. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:17, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Also blocked some socks. Courcelles (talk) 13:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

You (User:Maile66) protected this page in March 2017 due to persistent vandalism that also affected Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement and Talk:Zeitgeist (film series). Do you believe continued protection of the talk pages is warranted? 67.180.143.89 (talk) 23:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

@Materialscientist: I see you semi-protected the Peter Joseph article in Jan 2012 as indef. I was not an admin in that year. I did the same to the talk page in March 2017. Do you have a recommendation of what we should do here? The same above IP has made numerous requests for reduction in protection over at WP:RFUP — Maile (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Yes, because talk pages shouldn't stay protected indefinitely without cause. No agenda beyond that. The date that I originally gave is intended and correct. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I've added a note to your requests at Current requests for reduction in protection level. It makes sense to have all these addressed at one time, perhaps as a group. — Maile (talk) 00:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Respectfully, I believe Talk:Peter Joseph is your call based on your recollection of the circumstances. That's why I came to you in accordance with the instructions on RFUP. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I prefer it be dealt with here, since 2017 was too long to remember why it happened. Whoever resolves the rest of the listings for you, can also deal with this one. You can either accept that, or not, but I defer to admins here. — Maile (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I'll go ahead and incorporate Talk:Zeitgeist (film series) under this same request. The movement article has already been addressed. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Zeitgeist (film series) was protected by Georgewilliamherbert in 2015 for "Persistent sock puppetry". — Maile (talk) 14:55, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected both, per WP:ATPROT. Zeitgeist hasn't been protected in four years and talk pages shouldn't be protected at a higher level than their accompanying subject pages (except in extraordinary circumstances). George also hasn't edited in over half a year. Sdrqaz (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. The page was protected in November 2016 due to "persistent sock puppetry" although I personally don't see evidence of either, just two oversight actions more than a year apart. User:Mike V is no longer an admin. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 04:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected, per WP:ATPROT. The article hasn't been protected for six-and-a-half years and talk pages shouldn't be protected at a higher level than their accompanying subject pages (except in extraordinary circumstances). Sdrqaz (talk) 13:35, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: Requesting unprotection to create redirect for finale episode of Star Trek: Picard (season 3), titled "The Last Generation"; as this article doesn't exist (and is unrelated to the deletions ten years ago), it doesn't need disambiguation. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:31, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Pinging Ged UK as the page protector. -- Alex_21 TALK 05:33, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected Ged hasn't edited in six weeks, and this is pretty straightforward given the rationale and that it would eb totally unrelated to the old page. Courcelles (talk) 12:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Now that a registered user is involved in the edit war, I believe a full protection for both articles is necessary. Additionally, I'd like to request that the Mediaset Italia (company) article moved back to Mediaset, and move protection is imposed. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 15:52, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Motivations explained here. Telco4 (talk) 16:39, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Let me clarify once and for all this speech by Mediaset/Mediaset Italia/MFE - MediaForEurope, given that it can actually create confusion:

References

  1. ^ "Mediaset S.p.A. group structure before moving to Netherlands (you can see Mediaset S.p.A. at the bottom of the page".
  2. ^ "Mediaset N.V. group structure afer moving to Netherlands (you can see Mediaset N.V. at the bottom of the page)".
  3. ^ "MFE - MediaForEurope N.V. group structure (you can see MFE - MediaForEurope N.V. at the bottom of the page)".
Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 11:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:59, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: To determine whether protection remains necessary. This page was protected in April 2016 when an arbitration ruling imposed a general ban on edits from new users. That is no longer the case, and IP vandalism on the page appears not to have been unmanageable except for a few days before the protection. Protecting admin User:Ian.thomson is on break. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 15:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Maybe I'm mistaken about the terms of the current arbitration ruling, but some of the main articles related to the conflict (e.g. the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict" article itself) do not have their talk pages protected. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
That is because enforcement via protection is intended to only be done once those pages become problem spots, primarily for logistical reasons. Also, prots under PIA 500/30 can't be unilaterally overturned here; you need to register an account, get auto-confirmed, and request at WP:ARCA. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 21:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected This page cannot overturn an AE action. Courcelles (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Should be a redirect to Alex Moulton; requested at WP:AFC/R — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected and redirect created. Favonian (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

He is considered one of the best players in the world . 'Not just one of the best strikers in the world ' Madre12 (talk) 10:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Talk:Erling Haaland is not protected. Courcelles (talk) 12:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IP editors(s) that appear to be evading a ban. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism by an IP sock. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 17:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I would like to add my Reduced Fare Programs Heading and information to the page. Magician2017 (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done – The article is not currently protected. In fact, you edited it a few days ago. Providing reliable sources and discussing the changes on Talk:MBTA subway would be a good idea. Favonian (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Premature additions of a pending business deal. Nswix (talk) 17:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 17:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long term persistent disruptive editing and vandalism by IP editors. Sideswipe9th (talk) 18:28, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected--Ymblanter (talk) 18:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

04 April 2023

Exil5620

Reason: My personal profile page, would like to prevent vandalism. 66.219.122.131 (talk) 18:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Favonian (talk) 18:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The tournament will run for 2 months and lots of IPs are doing unsourced edits on it High level of IP vandalism. Rock Stone Gold Castle (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. This is also half CRYSTAL. Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 20:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 22:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor is constantly blanking information without a valid edit summary.   ArcAngel   (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious block evasion by socks of Heyoboyo, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Heyoboyo/Archive. MrOllie (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Since like 2 months, an IP has been pushing to include a piece content which says HT is publishing pro-Russian propaganda. Except the sources cited (some of them just random rating websites), I couldn't find any other RS discussing on it. The article was protected earlier due to this exact reason. I would ask for another a bit longer duration protection — DaxServer (t · m · c) 21:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: An IP editor is repeatedly inserting a section titled "Proposal of creating a National Judiciary School for the selection of judges". There is consensus of the Talk page that the section doesn't belong in this article. Four different named editors, including me, have reverted this edit, but the IP editor keeps re-reverting. Misha Wolf (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

A fifth named editor has now reverted this repeated edit. Misha Wolf (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. as an WP:ARBPIA measure. signed, Rosguill talk 00:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Misha Wolf (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Iam created article please Naufalhilmi2913 (talk) 20:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done – If you can't get the draft approved at WP:AFC, then it's not gonna happen. Favonian (talk) 21:48, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protectionDisruptive editing from roving IP editor who refuses to discuss or abide by WP:BRD. Note that this article is frequently a target of problematic editing from IPs. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:29, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just the two edits today. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
It's three edits – twice on April 2, and once today. --IJBall (contribstalk) 23:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To stop vandalised IP addresses from editing this page. Regards, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 21:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:33, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Many vandals editing the page to include their opinions on it Dontmesswithme100 (talk) 22:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Longer-term full protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There appear to be a raft of WP:COI editors (see talk) and for the most part WP:SPA editors including several socks of Janvez (talk · contribs) using this article as a WP:COATRACK to attack this academic. This appears to be an academic feud among Canadian agriculture academics spanning several years.

I realize full protection is a very strong restriction, but this feud has gone on far too long. Toddst1 (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC). Toddst1 (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:34, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite protection: Persistent vandalism and LTA abuse yet again. Page has been targeted for egregious vandalism for a long time despite multiple protections. See page's protection history. Quiet and Reserved (talk) 01:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pending changes protection removed, as it's useless while the article is semi-protected or EC-protected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Since protection expired, a number of questionable edits have been made against established consensus on the talk page. Recommend six months of either ECP or SEMI. —Locke Coletc 01:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 05:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Protection was just to stop a user from copying an external link in 2015 and not necessary now. Also, I would like to create the article. PalauanReich (talk) 17:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Do you have a draft that could be put there? I imagine one would improve the likelihood the page is unprotected. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 17:40, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
I just started a draft, but i'll work on it more Draft:Eucharistic miracle of Buenos Aires PalauanReich (talk) 17:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Talk page of blocked sock of WMF-banned pest WP:LTA/GRP, which is being vandalised by the LTA with nasty attacks using proxies. JavaHurricane 05:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Deleted the page instead. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 06:17, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPv6-hopping editor edit-warring to insert unsourced claims. More than one /64 involved.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 07:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Lectonar. Favonian (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Snagstaxi (talk) 01:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:40, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptions back soon after previous protection expired. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Request indefinite semi-protection. This article is about a pre-Islamic goddess worshiped in Arabia and the Levant. It is regularly vandalized to remove statements to the effect that she was a goddess, or worshiped in Arabia, or regarded as the wife or daughter of Allah, or other facts that are taken to be incompatible with Islam. Most of the edits are made by IP editors or inexperienced users with little or no history of editing other articles, or constructive edits anywhere. A majority of the edits made to this article for several years have been disruptive, and reverted. Pending-changes protection might be an alternative, but would probably not discourage attempted vandalism. In any event, this is a long-term situation, and unlikely to be resolved by temporary protection. P Aculeius (talk) 03:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption isn't heavy enough for semi-protection. Pending-changes is actually rather effective at preventing vandalism, as the version doesn't go "live" with the edit, but is reviewed. Lectonar (talk) 10:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism, given recent events. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 03:49, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:20, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: A lot of unregistered accounts are involved in disrupting the article and adding unsourced material to the article. I request for a semi protection lock. User:MNWiki845 (talk) 08:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Support, it is experiencing masses of "fantasy" cast-lists and other totally unsourced claims - Arjayay (talk) 10:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Though normally I avoid protecting articles which are up for AfD.Lectonar (talk) 10:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite protection: Persistent vandalism and LTA abuse yet again. Page has been targeted for egregious vandalism for a long time despite multiple protections. See page's protection history. Quiet and Reserved (talk) 01:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWP:HAND request by sock of LTA. Favonian (talk) 09:47, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant removal of sourced info. Semsûrî (talk) 10:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:31, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: LTA. Vandalism resumed shortly after the last protection expired. Protection originally requested by Kaseng55 at WP:ANI. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP persistently making grammatically incorrect edits after being told they are erroneous. oknazevad (talk) 13:12, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Repeated removal of referenced information by IP user(s), with edit summaries being rants about Chinese agents. Hopefully a pause will calm things down. Robminchin (talk) 13:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. a number of vandism incidents 1keyhole (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Courcelles. Favonian (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated vandalism - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and he is not yet sat at the Stamford Bridge desk with the hierarchy, but people keep changing his page. A week or a month lock would be my suggestion. PeachyBum07 (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Ongoing content dispute in which IP editor(s) keep adding back mentions of Kanye West's reaction to the film. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: We need to edit his page Bnnbreaking (talk) 12:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotectedY'all have been blocked. Favonian (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much trolling. Walt Yoder (talk) 01:25, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Appears to have calmed down. Anarchyte (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: This might be pre-mature, but requesting an indefinite semi protection for this page. The reason being is that I am suspecting there will be a lot of unsourced changes by IPs by changing Earth-616 to 199999 all because of a throwaway Easter egg line in the latest Across The Spiderverse trailer. I think it’d save a lot of effort and wean off the fanboys trying to make their own canon stick. MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 07:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Aoidh (talk) 14:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Very few, if any, edits by those who are not autoconfirmed have been constructive ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done - protecting this talk page would be contrary to its purpose. Anarchyte (talk) 13:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not following? ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
The talk page's purpose isn't just to be a dumping ground for unconstructive non-autoconfirmed comments. I'm not suggesting indef, but protection is clearly needed here to attempt to stop the WP:NOTAFORUM-esque comments. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

05 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing sports event, multiple bad IP edits in last hour. Walt Yoder (talk) 03:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruptive edits stopped last night after they won the NCAA championship. Daniel Case (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High Level of IP Vandalism Sulaiman Bala Idris (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Doesn't seem to have been any problems for a couple of weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-regular IP vandalism (typically mundane stuff like "ur mum"). Pbritti (talk) 15:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Like you said, "semi-regular". In a talk page edited so minimally since it was created that its edit history does not yet take up a full page, disruptive edits, while making up the vast majority, occur roughly a month apart, which does not appear to be anything the editors on the page can't handle. Daniel Case (talk) 20:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing changing of vehicle size and removal of references by IP. Bahooka (talk) 16:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuing unsourced changes in vehicle size and removal of references by IP. This article was recently protected for the same types of edits. Bahooka (talk) 16:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

I was just about to make the same request. Thanks for beating me to it. The fact that vandalism resumed the moment the protection was lifted suggests that this should receive long-term protection to me. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism by IPs or new accounts who are apparently still salty about the outcome of a sporting event that happened over a year ago (see here, here, here, here, here, and here). Suggest giving it pending changes protection for a couple of years. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 18:18, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Disruption frequency is too spaced apart for even pending-changes protection, in my opinion. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism, today's featured article GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined, given that it's now off the Main Page. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism from IP users. Actualcpscm (talk) 21:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism (registered). -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 00:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. For now. Two editors in the last 24 hours, but before that, disruption was on 1 April. Before that, 17 March. Please request again if frequency increases. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: COI editor reverting WP:INFONAT, despite being warned both on their talk page, as well as a week ago on their IPs. Nswix (talk) 02:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Soathehulkedits (talk · contribs). --Kinu t/c 02:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 02:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 17:15, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ 17:33, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Article hasn't been protected before. Lectonar (talk) 06:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-protection. IPs (probably one person, but multiple addresses) keep edit warring against multiple other editors, and are failing to take the dispute to the talk page. -- Tryptofish (talk) 20:13, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP Vandalism 2604:3D09:6A84:7700:46EA:1DE4:BAE:3315 (talk) 18:54, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: (semi protection) An anon IP editor keeps on adding hoax information on this article (about a supposed weekend edition of this newscast). This newscast only airs on weekends. - WayKurat (talk) 03:54, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protect This article has been subject to edit warring for weeks from anon IPs (potentially they are the same person to avoid detection). LibStar (talk) 06:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: edit war between autoconfirmed and not autoconfirmed requires ECP -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. 1keyhole (talk) 20:35, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An Ip 2604:3D09:A17E:69C0:EC1C:D135:BF45:BB5E Continues to add unsourced content to White Army. Untamed1910 (talk) 00:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Request for *increase* in protection level, from Pending Changes, to semi-protected. Persistent disruptive edits from IP addresses, primarily on topics that have been settled multiple times on talk page and by common sense. Most come down to uncritically accepting church claims when they should not be. See talk page discussion for more details; when I requested consensus to request this change, I received no objections. Trevdna (talk) 02:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Disruption hasn't reached the point where semi-protection would be necessary. Lectonar (talk) 06:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Continous vandalism. Need permanent protection.

Dheeraj Sharma (professor) Reason: High level of vandalism. Permanent protection requested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aum80 (talkcontribs) 03:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Once again requesting page protection for this. The many months-long vandalism has persisted despite the user and their many sockpuppets being blocked. If this page is protected for some time (6 months, or even 1 year) it will remove the possibility for that to occur again, any time soon. Yeehaw45 (talk) 04:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Better to block the sockpuppets. Lectonar (talk) 06:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Similar consistent vandalism as the Where We Started page has received. It has been ongoing for months despite numerous blocks. Semi-protection for a lengthy period of time would likely be effective. Yeehaw45 (talk) 04:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. As above. Lectonar (talk) 06:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been similarly vandalized on-and-off as part of an unusual slew of edits that appear related. Yeehaw45 (talk) 04:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Better to block the sockpuppets. Lectonar (talk) 06:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent vandalism from sockpuppets over the past six months. Yeehaw45 (talk) 04:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Better to block the sockpuppets. Disruption only ever few weeks at best. Lectonar (talk) 06:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Ethnic edit warring by newly created account. Thank you पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 05:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 06:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

On January 31, 2023, Sonoma State University Academic Advisor and Researcher, published the first ever ChatGPT full-length Science Fiction Novel, ‘WHEN AN IDF GOES TO MARS. Storyline about the Adventures of several Human Astronauts and their A.I. Android who travels to Mars in Script Format. ISBN-10: 1365295648. Vegapost (talk) 13:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Source? While I'm willing to buy something like this has happened (see Naked Came the Stranger and Atlanta Nights) we'd need a hard source for this since this seems like it'd be challenged fairly quickly. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 18:25, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined Source for requested edit not provided. Lectonar (talk) 06:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Continual vandalism from IP users Top5a (talk) 06:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
There is a persistent level of no Wikipedia:Consensus, and the persistent levels of vandalism are being done by IP users, who do not engage in Talk pages or anywhere else on Wikipedia. They are one-shot users that vandalize the page then disappear. Top5a (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of a nonfree image by new users and IPs right after the old protection expired. Might take another week or two for them to forget about this. PopoDameron ⁠talk 09:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:32, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Sockpuppetry from new accounts; seems to be a concerted effort to whitewash a subject. Disruption has amplified since last declined request. — Czello 10:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Article has been protected for 12 years. I think it might be time to try experimental unprotecting to see if the pre 2010-vandalism is over. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 10:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I will meet you halfway :), and have watchlisted. Protecting admin essentially not active anymore. Lectonar (talk) 10:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP users. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 01:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 11:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. tgeorgescu (talk) 05:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 11:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass attack by what seems to be a sockfarm. JavaHurricane 05:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Vandalism by rapidly changing IP. Adakiko (talk) 05:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC) ~: Note: whack-a-mole! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism has started again after page protection expired in February. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:49, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Name change. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 12:31, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. this time. Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism over 72 hours now, from 4 IPs and 2 newly registered accounts. signed, Willondon (talk) 14:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. My last request for temporary protection of the talk page was declined with the reasoning of it defeating the purpose of the talk page. However the talk page's purpose isn't to be a dumping ground of unconstructive comments from non-autoconfirmed users, which is all that has been going on recently (the most recent revision that was actually adding something meaning to the talk page was here) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The bar is pretty high for protecting talk pages, but I think this is above the bar. Let's see if another 2 week break will cause them to lose interest. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:33, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please semi for 21 days. An IP-hopping vandal has changed the lede to refer to rigatoni as "a creamy tomato sauce" twice in a week, to the point of affecting/offending at least one new user (please see the talk page), and 3 weeks ought to give the vandal time to find a new hobby. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 15:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor spamming. Devokewater 16:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. 77.124.164.169 (talk) 04:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Edits since the last protection I imposed expired do not appear to have been too disruptive. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: On Main page, multiple instances of vandalism. Please give protection for a day Starship 24 (talk) 19:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long term edit warring Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism (disruptive reverts with the stated aim of removing verified information) by IP editors dating back to January 2022. A request for increased page protection was made on 28 March 2023, resulting in bans to some IP accounts. Vandalism has since reoccurred by new IP addresses (I'm assuming the same individual on each occasion). Narkova (talk) 10:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Can someone please semi this for a couple days to force a new editor to the talk?. Or p-bloc them from the article for a couple days, they're at 9 edits right now. Valereee (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined I gave them a level 3 templated warning, which no one else appears to have done yet. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Whitewashing. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 21:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Upgrade to extended-confirmed owing to continuing sockpuppetry. — Czello 16:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Favonian. for one month. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined Article is already semi-protected, no disruption took place after that protection was put in place. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 18:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
@Scottywong: There is still disruption taking place by the same socks — Czello 19:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the Trump arrest, this page has been highly vandalized. Gtgamer79 (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Really, things have been under control since yesterday. And asking for indefinite ECP for a page never previously protected, even given that it comes under two contentious topics, is a bit of a tall order. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: It is significantly POV towards the topic, it is a controversial topic, it is prone to brigading and TIGERing, and should be protected to some extent to allow NPOV form and maintenance. Keith D. Tyler 18:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Not only is this request CRYSTAL, if you'd look at the talk page you'd see that, as the central page in a decade-old ArbCom case, it is already under contentious topic restrictions, including 1RR and enforced BRD. If further protection is felt to be necessary, it really would be better discussed at Arbitration Enforcement. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

06 April 2023

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 17:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 23:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent WP:BLP violations. Graphingcalc (talk) 19:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined, this is just one user, please warn them and see whether they would stop. Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Irrelevant editing 2400:ADC5:174:7A00:B04A:B26E:8FD6:C6F7 (talk) 21:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined. 2400:ADC5:174:7A00::/64 blocked for disruptive editing. --Kinu t/c 21:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Irrelevant editing has been done. 2400:ADC5:174:7A00:B04A:B26E:8FD6:C6F7 (talk) 21:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

I believe that irrelevant editing is not a reason to do anything. Besides, your disruptive editing is far worse Starship 24 (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 23:03, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. There are more vandalism related edits on this page that nonvandlism related edits. Starship 24 (talk) 21:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) The last edit to this article was 7 months ago. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 21:37, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Kinu t/c 21:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Little to no good content is ever added by non confirmed users and lots of bad. I still have pending changes, not semi-protection. But the vandlism vs. good edits ratio is far over 1 @Kinu Starship 24 (talk) 21:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
As Kinu said, there is not enough recent activity to justify protection. Protecting an article who's last edit was made last year is unnecessary. If further, more recent disruption occurs, request protection again. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 21:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 23:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 00:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Starship 24 (talk) 21:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CastJared (talk) 22:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Tragic topic, claims by trolls it is a hoax ([8]) repeated insertions of denialism into article text. Always by IPs. Please protect both article and talk page Elinruby (talk) 22:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:07, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Last 50 changes over three months are all unhelpful and reverted edits by IPs and new users (except one word added by an auto confirmed user). special:Diff/1122649157/1148361445 Request semi-protection, indef. ⁓ Pelagicmessages ) 18:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. They seem to come in spurts every few weeks or so. If there's nothing in this fortnight of pending-changes, I don't see the point in continuing. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 23:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
@Bbb23, it's happening again. Philipnelson99 (talk) 02:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: These three pages have Tidy font errors and other WP:lint within, and their other talkpage archives are not protected and not experiencing any issues. I'd like access to address these lint errors as I've done for multiple other pages recently. These pages were selfprotected by the user, and the user has been largely inactive since 2006 (they made a four comments in 2019 and 2020 to specific users on their talk pages, but have otherwise been gone). I don't feel a need to contact them due to this absence, and due to Fastily's July 2011 comment "Long gone user. Protection no longer necessary" when removing page protection to Katefan0's current talk page. I will ask on Katefan0's talk page if needed procedurally, but I'm not expecting to get a response if I were to do so. Zinnober9 (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected all three. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too many destructive edits from IPs. – jona 23:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Two editors in a day, and before that, nothing in around two weeks. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent vandalism target with a long history of being semi-protected. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined. The last actual vandalism (apart from CubeBoy9000) was over a month ago. The dispute over whether it is mock fighting or not is more of a content dispute. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Flu articles

Reason: Sock puppetry; same as rest of the swine flu articles I reported. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 00:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Please note that I've merged all of the requests into one to prevent clogging up this page further. Declined all of them, given that the last activity was 22 hours ago. If it restarts, please request again. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by an anonymous user. The IP user has been warned about disruptively editing other articles as well, and they keep doing it. They also keep saving changes, before making more edits to the page when it'd just be easier to use the edit preview. I recommend at least a week of protection. TheVHSArtist (talk) 01:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. We also don't protect pages for single users. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This article is being edited heavily as part of an education project and the less-than-skilled student editor is making unhelpful edits from several IPs. Semi protection would at least force them to use the one account where they will see talk page messages/warnings. Toddst1 (talk) 21:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

I dont believe that pages are protected for sockpuppetry Starship 24 (talk) 21:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
They are. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 21:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Some examples??? @Throast Starship 24 (talk) 22:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Ryan Kavanaugh is one I've been involved with that comes to mind. America's Got Talent (season 2) is another one I randomly pulled from Category:Wikipedia semi-protected pages. I'm sure there are many more. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 22:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. And yes, pages are definetely protected for sockpuppetry (just have a look at the protection log to find them). Lectonar (talk) 06:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. BRDude70 (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined. The club website and his Instagram profile verifies the information you've reverted as vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 02:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
@BrazilianDude70: In case you didn't see my message above. Sdrqaz (talk) 03:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

बार बार बदला गया : High level of IP vandalism. Rahul Jadaun (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Wrong venue; based on the request below, this appears to be a request to protect a title at the Hindi Wikipedia. Kinu t/c 06:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

हटाए गए पृष्ठ को बार-बार बनाना: High level of IP vandalism. Rahul Jadaun (talk) 06:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Wrong venue; this appears to be a request to protect a title at the Hindi Wikipedia. Kinu t/c 06:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Same content fixating on Chinese involvement with company being added repeatedly by multiple IP's, with accusations made towards editors reverting them of working for the Swedish government. TylerBurden (talk) 00:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Same situation on this article as on Volvo, edit warring to claim that Volvo Cars is Chinese using multiple IP's. TylerBurden (talk) 00:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As above. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:02, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High frequency of attempts to change the festival name. Chronikhiles (talk) 03:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The article has been constantly vandalized for many years. Janhrach (talk) 05:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long term semi protection every few days a different IP vandalises this article by adding false information. LibStar (talk) 09:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 09:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of WP:SNYTHesis and unsourced information to the lead section by various, non-responsive IPs. Throast {{ping}} me! (talk | contribs) 18:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I don't think we're quite at the level of requiring protection yet. Maybe drop a note on the talk page of why your version of the lead is an improvement, then if IPs change it, we can block or protect then. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent block evasion and disruption: perpetual problem, same protection almost as secretariat. ImChessFan21 (talk) 13:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: There is no real reason for this to be protected Starship 24 (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Starship 24, for some reason you neglected to ask Wizardman, the protecting and still active admin, but, in light of his rationale for protecting, let me ask you: Is there a pragmatic (as opposed to ideological) reason why IPs/newbies should edit a page that's reserved for robotic maintenance? Favonian (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
No. However, the default is allow all editors. This is only changed when persistent vandlism warrants it. It is not the other way around. @Favonian Starship 24 (talk) 20:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
True, but if it is a page that only needs to be maintained by a bot, there is no reason for IP addresses to edit the page, so we are just opening up a page that doesn't need IP edits to potential vandals. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 21:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Then why not full extended confirmed protection Starship 24 (talk) 21:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
If you feel the protection should be higher, then WP:RFPP is right around the corner. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
If it makes more sense to semi-protect to keep IPs and newly-registered users off a page that shouldn't need to be, and is never, edited by people, then why not do so?Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 22:06, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – The risk of IPs/newbies messing up the page, accidentally or deliberately, outweighs the ideological benefits of unprotection. Favonian (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Adding unsourced content by IPs. LancedSoul (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 116.240.45.244 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Previous protection expired a couple of weeks ago and the disruptive editing resumed yesterday.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:21, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (comment) 15:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm a big red sox fan and i know a lot i would like to edit some of the players. Soccerbesibolfan2678999 (talk) 12:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: Red sox is just a redirect to Boston Red Sox. Presumably your request is about the latter, so I've changed the header accordingly. Favonian (talk) 13:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to include reliable sources for your claims. Lack thereof has been a major problem with your other contributions. Favonian (talk) 13:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism beginning today, either with removal of content from "Personal life" section or "changes" to career history of Zech without providing sources. Historyday01 (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 monht, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! I may have to re-apply for protection in a month. Hopefully semi-protection helps. Historyday01 (talk) 17:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: Persistent editing of closed discussion. —DIYeditor (talk) 17:05, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection (or block of IP) - Edit warring IP adding unsourced, WP:OR, and controversial content after being reverted multiple times. --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Hmmm... One year may be overkill. I could see two weeks or a month being reasonable though... --IJBall (contribstalk) 17:17, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandaliam going back months. -- Mebigrouxboy (talk) 02:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A quick perusal of the page's history shows that almost all edits to this page since the start of 2023 have been vandalism or reversions. Not especially frequent (generally a few times a week), but IMO the problem is widespread to justify protection. It'd probably be best to protect for quite a while, since the meme doesn't show any signs of slowing down. — SamX [talk · contribs · he/him] 05:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA perrenial problem. ImChessFan21 (talk) 12:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – persistent LTA perrenial problem. ImChessFan21 (talk) 12:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Block evasion and spam: same target twice for a some reasons. Why did not good for a everyone to you?. ImChessFan21 (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Long-term block evasion and vandalism: LTA target but almost a IP hopping users. ImChessFan21 (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP sock puppetry and edit warring: persistent LTA target. ImChessFan21 (talk) 13:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined @ImChessFan21: You are flooding this noticeboard with frivolous reports. No one has edited this article since March 28. Do not file any more reports here until you learn the proper standards for requesting protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism, with removals of article section entitled "Accusations of abuse". Historyday01 (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that! Historyday01 (talk) 18:38, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – BLP getting PROMO and uncited personal information from IP/mobile address. CT55555(talk) 17:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Multiple non-extended-confirmed users editing an article that is subject to restrictions. Nythar (💬-🍀) 03:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:10, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This is a new article on a rather obscure topic, but it has been subjected to persistent IP vandalism almost since it was first created. Kevmin § 18:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several IPs are edit-warring in the lead over the language to use to summarize the published reviews by critics. A topic was opened on the talk page to facilitate a discussion leading (hopefully) to consensus, but none of the edit-warring IPs are participating.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 13:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: A significant portion of the edits to this page are in the form of unconstructive vandalism, or reverting vandalism. The useful edits are mainly by registered users. Hence I believe it would benefit from semi-protection. Praemonitus (talk) 18:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 18:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: someone is adding irrelevant information into it. Sardar abdul-rehman-khan (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

I am in agreement - because you just attempted to hijack the page, and the history shows pretty much just IP edits and reverts of same for the past month; a short-term semi-protection only slowed it down. —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 19:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Problems may end up being resolved by someone getting blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
If it helps, the IPs all seem to be IPv6s with the first four octets being 2400:ADC5:174:7A00; I wonder if a /64 would be enough to nip that in the bud. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
That already happened yesterday. Favonian (talk) 19:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Which would explain the registered account. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Given the persistence and subsequent block evasion, this seems like a good idea, even though it's not the version that the disruptive editor who made the request wanted. --Kinu t/c 20:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP user keep adding information that is not fully confirmed yet. No matter how many warnings i put in the edit summary. Dates, times and cities for the match are confirmed as the tournament goes. Guilherme (talk) 13:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:14, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs continue to insert unsourced "future" projects in the filmography table contrary to WP:FILMOGRAPHY, which calls for only adding them when filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 13:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs whom kept changing "South Korean" to "North Korean". Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:42, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from multiple IPs whom kept changing "South Korean" to "North Korean". Paper9oll (🔔📝) 14:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs edit-warring to add unsourced "future" film projects contrary to WP:FILMOGRAPHY, which says not to add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 15:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 19:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

07 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 16:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Semi-protection wouldn't help, as at least one of editors wanting to add Tamils is auto-confirmed. Furthermore, some editors refer to a "consensus", but I can't find any recent discussion on the (horribly long and in need of archiving) talk page. Favonian (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption including BLP violations as well as vandalism, chronic issue with the article. TylerBurden (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 22:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Article Presents Wrong information 2601:40:C780:2CC0:A806:8A95:4E4:FFE4 (talk) 21:03, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – The talk page is not protected, but you were caught trying to refactor other editors' comments. Do that again, and you'll be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 21:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: This has every appearance of being Owmarh logged out. I've blocked them for 72 hours for disruptive editing. Ponyobons mots 22:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 22:32, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP address users. Marokwitz (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 20:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given recent events, this article has become a target for vandalism and probably will remain so for a short time. Bneu2013 (talk) 23:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

International institution talk pages

Reason: Topics of legitimate interest, no ongoing reason to protect. All three were protected in September 2018 by AmandaNP acting as an oversighter. She hasn't responded to my inquiry, nor did she respond to one from another user in October 2021. Of the three, only the World Bank is protected on the article side. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 00:05, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I will note that the only one that has (apparent) suppressed edits seems to be IMF, and given the sorts of things that warrant suppression I think the major question with that article is whether or not the situation has evolved over the past four and a half years that unprotection can be tried. Key word there is "apparent" - the logs on the other two pages indicates there are also revdel'd edits there, but there's flat out no indication those edits were ever made, more consistent with the older form of suppression I'm familiar with. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 00:14, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined. I'm not comfortable overriding an Action taken as an oversighter, intended to be indef—that sort of wording implies that this should only be lifted by someone who can see what exactly is going on here. Feel free to email oversight-en-wp@wikipedia.org if you'd like other oversighters to take a look at this. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:34, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously semi-protected due to consistent removal of sourced content. As soon as the article was unprotected, the same removal commenced again along with a legal threat. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 22:00, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 09:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism Wkpdsrnm2023 (talk) 01:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 03:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Restoring and extending previous protection. --Kinu t/c 04:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring over whether or not to include content despite editors being asked to use the talk page and gain consensus for their changes. Requesting full protection for a month. —Locke Coletc 07:21, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I agree that this page needs to be fully locked, regardless of the length. Since the editors discussing their concerns have now started directly contradicting every single claim made like the similar ends of two magnets, the discussion likely won't be resulting in any consensus. — Nythar (💬-🍀) 07:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. @Locke Cole: noted the suggestion re a month's protection but am hoping the policy discussion won't take quite that long. Can always be extended if necessary. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

08 April 2023

Reason: Persistent block evasion. 149.3.119.122 (talk) 03:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Thanks for reporting this, and the history of past vandalism is noted. However there's only one disruptive edit this month, which probably doesn't justify protection at this stage. Let's see how it goes. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:33, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Considering recent high-profile events in this state, this article has become a target for vandalism and probably will remain so for a short time. Bneu2013 (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 montns, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't see the current events issue calming down anytime soon. — Maile (talk) 00:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Already a few vandalism edits, with the latest ruling would expect more vandalism and trolling here. nableezy - 23:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC) 23:56, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Anon on talk page makes a good point that the article has been protected for 13 years. Obviously a mistake that it is still in place, plus subject is now deceased. NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs), the admin who put the protection in place, doesn't seem to be all that active. Seasider53 (talk) 21:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

UnprotectedFavonian (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism محرر البوق (talk) 18:19, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 00:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A US Democratic politician has switched to the Republican party and IP editors are taking out their frustrations on the BLP. (Some IP edits were constructive but others are vicious, and I'm logging off soon.). Schazjmd (talk) 23:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with parent page. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of poorly sourced content by IPs and new editors. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:08, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Editors seem to have been handling things OK. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page gets lots of WP:NOTAFORUM violations from IPs. The {{Not a forum}} tag and a question I added to the page's FAQ don't seem to help. Zoe Trent Fan🎤💍 19:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Blatant vandalism involving multiple IP and sock puppet accounts. Some accounts have already been permanently blocked, but now they seem to be ban-evading. This attack involves multiple participants, it started recently and there is no indication of when it will stop. It is certainly being coordenated by a group outside WP, possibly by members of Predator Poachers themselves, as seen by the fact that they all started attacking at the same time with texts that are promotional to the group. I'm requesting a semi-protection of 1 month.

This is a recent article, I was still cleaning up some good-faith mistakes in it, but doing that now is impossible due to some troll always reverting what I have done in a matter of a few hours. 🔥 22spears 🔥 19:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article hasn't been around a month, and as noted the disruption seems pretty recent. Let's see how a week works. Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Over the last couple days multiple IPs have been editing this page and changing/removing many things, such as: changing the infobox image, removing the other images, changing years active, removing his post-nominals from the infobox, and changed his birth place from Cheshire to Merseyside (despite it specifically saying NOT to do that). Ollieisanerd (talk) 20:47, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not a lot of reverting of these edits going on, then, it seems. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — Czello 21:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: In recent years, there has been a large amount of sockpuppet by undisclosed paid editors adding content in favor of Qatar and against Qatar opponents (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain). The sockfarms are primarily Radovicdarko538 and Bennet43 (AKA Orangemoody) and are active in English, French, and Arabic Wikipedia. We used to keep up with blocks, but since late 2020, they have increasingly moved to rotating residential proxies. That means that they use a different IP, usually from different ranges, for every single edit. I keep a more detailed account of this activity here and here. I think we should semi-protect the top pages targeted by this group. There are almost no recent significant contributions by unregistered editors in these, so I think collateral should be relatively low. Here's a subset I propose for semi-protections:

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by MelanieN Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not really seeing much, if anything, over the last couple weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 01:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

-- MarioGom (talk) 16:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to Humar rights in Saudi Arabia and Human rights in Egypt. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to Qatar corruption and Foreign relations of Qatar. MelanieN (talk) 22:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism on an article about two living persons. White 720 (talk) 21:43, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 09:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi protection - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:06, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Courcelles. Favonian (talk) 09:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed after last protection expired. Jalen Folf (talk) 06:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 09:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Persistent vandalism from several users Detetrident (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Considered pending changes but let's see if semi-protection does the job. -- Euryalus (talk) 09:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Please block User:Onewikibarnes from editing article Maximum subarray problem for persistent bad edits, (incorrect) original research, and WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT behavior which have required repeated reverts by multiple editors (myself and Jochen Burghardt). At this point I don't think more than protecting that one page from that one editor is necessary. I am too WP:INVOLVED to do more than merely requesting this myself. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:08, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

I have engaged User:David Eppstein in conversation on this page as much as possible. He discusses points about bad edits, but that are not bad edits and he keeps reverting changes that are succinct and accurate. The problem is a math problem that they've used source code to discuss. They have deliberately left the solution false in cases where the input is all negative numbers. I corrected the source code and he's consistently reverted the correction. This moved further when they simply tried to explain the incorrect behavior in the source code instead of simply fixing the source code.
A previous editor a few months ago tried to make this change as well, and User:David Eppstein responded with condescension. I've received the same condescension in these updates and minimal constructive dialogue. I tried to engage him further on my talk page with source code examples, but this context has not been addressed. In that regard User:David Eppstein has been farm more engaged in WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT behavior than me. Onewikibarnes (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
In fact, the solution presented in the article is not false in cases where the input is all negative numbers. That claim is symptomatic of Onewikibarnes's poor understanding. The actual situation is that, for all-negative arrays, there is more than one definition of what to do in different sources, and that the article (except in the versions badly edited by Onewikibarnes) presents and clearly distinguishes both of the standard definitions. According to one definition, the result should be an empty subarray, with sum zero. According to the other definition, empty subarrays are not allowed, and the sum should be the least negative of the remaining elements. This is the exact locus of Onewikibarnes's IDIDNTHEARTHAT behavior. Despite the clear statement of all of this on the article page, Onewikibarnes refuses to accept the empty-subarray-with-sum-zero solution, found in many sources, as "correct" and continues to edit-war to remove that solution from the article, instead reverting to an inconsistent and false version of the article that says it admits empty subarrays but actually presents code that uses the no-empty-subarrays version. This has been reverted multiple times, and Jochen Burghardt has worked hard to present this matter in an even more clear way on the article so that even Onewikibarnes might understand it, but to no avail; Onewikibarnes merely keeps reverting to their bad version. It is this repeated reversion, as well as the total lack of evidence that Onewikibarnes has improved their understanding at all, that convinces me that an article-specific block is required. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
I will first respond to this context and then get to User:Maile66's response.
User:David Eppstein is claiming that the all negative numbers scenario is my "poor understand" (I guess he insists on being condescending). He gives an explanation that's contrived and off-point. The explanation is off point and shows that there's no comprehension of a programmatic solution. I've provided code that proves this, but I'll state it here. If you're provided with an all negative array, there is, in fact a subset that is smallest in that array. It's essentially the negative number that's closest to zero. For example, in the array [-5, -7, -1, -2] the answer would be -1. You can't add any further negative numbers as this would be even less. In a non-positive array (containing a zero), the answer would be zero. In the case of the empty array (which programmatically is a very real and common input for programs) the code returned zero as well. There is no presence of numbers, hence a number shouldn't be returned. This is a common case of no input provided a no output response is given. In programmatic turns this is referred to as null (None in Python which is the code used in the example). Empty input in a program does not return a valid output. Any software developer would tell you this is a horrible thing to do. You respond with no-output can be given. You put nothing in, you get nothing out. In both these cases User:David Eppstein keeps insisting that a solution that returns 0 is correct, and then is attempting to explain it away with specious reasoning instead of actually fixing the code. I'm not failing to understand anything. His reasoning just isn't sound, and insists that he's correct. Why? Who knows...
Furthermore, I'd like to point out that User: Yongli Dai made the exact same correction in April 6 of 2022 and received the same pejorative response.
I came to this article as I was doing this exact problem in LeetCode and trying to check my work. I noticed it failed for some of the exact inputs that they made. I made the fix and immediately received a response of "what part of <x> don't you understand". Not engaged in constructive dialogue. Not an attempt to explain the position (it's said that this escalation is the most explanation I've received from User:David Eppstein on the issue). Simply put, snide and nasty response dripping with hubris. This is not how we want Wikipedia content editing to occur. This will turn off contributors. User:David Eppstein keeps saying that I'm in engaging in IDIDNTHEART behavior, however if you look at the dialogue and points I've addressed every single one of the points he's brought, he has not done the same, just stuck to his position that the wrong answer is right. WP:NOTGETTINGIT
I'm a software engineer with over twenty years experience at enterprise software corporations. This code would be rejected immediately in any submission. Onewikibarnes (talk) 01:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Answer demonstrates clearly that Owb continues to fail to get the point. In an all-negative array like Owb's example [-5, -7, -1, -2] the subarrays and their values are [] with sum 0 (see empty sum), [-5] with sum -5, [-7] with sum -7, [-1] with sum -1, [-2] with sum -2, [-5,-7] with sum -12, etc. Note that the sum 0 of the empty subarray [] is a bigger number than the sum -1 of the answer Owb states. Some of the sources on the problem (including, importantly, the original sources for the algorithm our article describes) define it in a way that allows [] to be the optimum. When they do so, the result should be 0, because its sum is bigger than the other numbers one can get in this way Some other sources disallow [] as being considered to be a subarray, and instead return -1, the sum that is least negative. Owb continues to insist that there can be only one answer (despite the fact that our sources have two different definitions), and to leave the article in a broken state where the text says that [] is allowed as a subarray but the code returns -1. It is not a content dispute, at least not in the sense that Owb has any claim of validity to their preferred content. It is much closer to WP:CHEESE. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
I guess again, I have to point out that User:David Eppstein is using reason to support his own point, but isn't salient. The first point that the [-3, -7, -5] array contains the empty sub-array is specious at best. The input is provided as an array of 3 elements. The empty array is not present. If within the same code you performed the len() function on the array it would return the value 3. If we want to look at this from a perspective of linear algebra; when identifying sub-matrices, the empty matrix ([]) is not included. I have no idea where User:David Eppstein is coming up with this reason. User:David Eppstein, are you willing to cite a source?
The second point I've already spoken to, but I'll address again. The empty array does not have a value of zero. Zero is a discreet number which means a specific value was determined. There was no input provided, hence no determined or discrete value can be provided. Onewikibarnes (talk) 04:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
The second error in your second paragraph is to use the word "discreet" when you almost certainly intended the different word "discrete". However, to address the more serious error: the sum of [] is certainly 0. For instance, typing sum([]) in Python returns 0. There are good reasons for this behavior: when you concatenate two arrays, you should add their sums, and concatenating the empty array makes no change to the other array so its sum must be the additive identity. As for the request for a source in the first paragraph: the "programming pearls" column in CACM, by Jon Bentley, already cited in the article, states: "To complete the definition of the problem, we'll say that when all inputs are negative the maximum sum subvector is the empty vector, which has sum zero." The other of the two earliest sources already in the article, Gries 1982, states (for a version of the problem that asks for the minimum sum rather than the maximum sum) "empty sections should also be considered. Thus, if the array contains only positive values, the minimum-sum section is the empty section and its sum is 0". —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
@David Eppstein and Onewikibarnes: Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — Maile (talk) 00:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for your response; User:Maile66. I definitely did not want this to become as contentious as it has. Would it be possible to find a 3rd party (detached from both myself and User:David Eppstein to review? I'm confident my edits will stand true provided this individual has both a math and software background. I think that's the only way (unfortunately) to resolve this conflict as of now. Onewikibarnes (talk) 01:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
@Onewikibarnes: Not sure. Other than the edit warring noticeboard, you could post the question over at WP:ANI. — Maile (talk) 01:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
WT:WPM is more likely to get a better response from people competent to read the article and not interested in stirring up unnecessary drama the way someone who steers new users to ANI might be interpreted as doing. However, the likely response from those people is just to continue to revert OwB and allow OwB to continue slowly edit-warring unsourced incorrect edits into the encyclopedia. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This noticeboard is the wrong venue for settling a content dispute with aspects of edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 09:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. On second thoughts, I've removed the temptation to resume edit-warring. Favonian (talk) 09:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. –Vipz (talk) 23:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Vanjagenije. Euryalus (talk) 01:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. IPs adding WP:NOT text and edit warring over it — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:58, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent deleting of information. Sforacle (talk) 10:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: I have deleted the contested label as well. The reference does not mention "fascism" (neo or otherwise) and it's about Ümit Özdağ and his Victory Party. Favonian (talk) 11:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined Article seems to have stabilized. Favonian (talk) 09:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Disruptive editing and deletion of information once again. The semi protection has proven ineffective. Suspected case of WP:SOCK because 2 new users and IP address are making the exact same edits. محرر البوق (talk) 06:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 86.146.153.121 (talk) 07:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – No rationale provided. Favonian (talk) 07:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 16:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC) 16:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:12, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Highly contentious topic would be best if we just semi this page.... long history of disruptive editing at this featured article. Moxy- 02:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Dr.scholar777 (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Editing from unknown sources is being made; we are from the institute and need the page locked as soon as possible. IIM Rohtak (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More likely to be IP users vandalising the article. 1394ochi (talk) 11:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: For reasons frankly beyond my comprehension this article about a random Toyota seems to have become a persistent long-term target for block evaders and sockpuppeters such as Alex Neman, MrDavr, and the "New Changes" IP (in some cases confirmed, in other cases what seem like fairly obvious WP:DUCKs) as well as general disruptive editing from IPs and new accounts. Examples can be seen here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here. Note that in many cases this is editors who frequently edit about the subject matter reverting WP:DUCKs engaging in stealth vandalism or other forms of disruptive editing that can be difficult to spot without prior context. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 12:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 12:18, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Should be indefinitely protected per Wikipedia:General sanctions/Beauty pageants. { [ ( jjj 1238 ) ] } 12:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Jjj1238, it's not that easy. As 180.195.117.246 is currently blocked for block evasion, that does justify applying the indefinite semi-protection. Please have a look at the sanctions description again. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Anonymous user keeps adding the same unreferenced content and getting it reverted [11][12][13][14] by various editors. Some of their IPs have been blocked but they are (intentionally or not) changing addresses. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:20, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Bri, none of these appear to have been blocked, and they're all part of the same /64 network. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Subject of article may have recently died; new users and IP editors have added date of death without citation. (I've looked for an RS for death and can't find one.) Requesting temporary protection until death confirmed and sourced. Tacyarg (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

This appears to have happened by now, so WP:BLP's applicability is debatable.
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent sock puppetry/vandalism. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 23:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Shadow of the Starlit Sky, this seems to be a case for a checkuser rangeblock behind the scenes, not the protection of all pages in this area. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping editor reverting to personal attack. Ravensfire (talk) 16:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protectedFavonian (talk) 16:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent drive-by SPA IP's altering text in a NPOV way, with no edit summaries or sources. Slatersteven (talk) 12:28, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated IP vandalism. CLalgo (talk) 14:15, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 17:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. (Roundish t) 16:17, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: repeated addition of external links, removal of sourced content, addition of unsourced promotional content by Minneapolis IPs who are likely UPE sockpuppets. Valereee (talk) 11:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: There is a dispute between the person of the page and h3h3productions, a popular YouTube channel with a large following who revealed the dispute on twitter.

The only sources for this on the page are first-hand sources from Ethan Klein. Also, there is obvious WP:VD to show Shahrzad Rafati in a negative light (see “thief” in occupations or the first paragraph of the summary in previous history) as well as possible WP:COI. In order to avoid undo/editing wars and remove biased editing, the page should be protected. Fuser55 (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by mobile IPs also at related article Shahrzad Rafati. Zefr (talk) 17:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ArmyOnceBlinkMidzyalt (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:17, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Resumed after last protection expired; was indef semi'd before ECP was applied for other vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: Now when this this template is used only on soft redirects – for hard redirects {{R with Wikidata item}} is used – this is not WP:HIGHRISK template anymore. Nagsb (talk) 23:25, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: applied the protection. — Maile (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment: Even if it isn't high-risk, I don't see why anyone would need to edit this. As with Wikipedia:Good article nominations yesterday, unprotecting it just seems to be asking for trouble. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 02:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

@Sumanuil I want to edit it: Template talk:Wikidata redirect#Edit request 7 April 2023. Nagsb (talk) 07:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
It appears to have been done. So there's still no reason to unprotect it, especially when an edit request has been made. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 07:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected – Using edit requests is the preferred approach. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Responding because I was pinged: I didn't actually protect this, I just reduced it to TE at someone's request. It was originally protected by Mifter, but they don't seem to be around too often. I agree it should stay protected: the requested edit has been implemented, and there are about 850 transclusions which I think is well beyond the high risk threshold. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 19:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism – It has been at least partially reverted, but the current data isn't fully trustworthy. This kind of data should just be updated once a year. Requesting same protection as for List of countries by GDP (nominal). The RedBurn (ϕ) 07:45, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:09, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 10:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A valid concern when this request was made, but there have been no edits to the page in over 24 hours at this point. Daniel Case (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:20, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi protection: - IP vandalism.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:36, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 17:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi protection: New/IP user disruptive editing Frietjes (talk) 15:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Less Unless (talk) 17:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Constant adding of unsourced sections by editor. - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 17:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No new edits after last good version restored 24 hours ago. Daniel Case (talk) 17:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

09 April 2023

Reason: Persistent vandalism as of late. –Vipz (talk) 20:32, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:1680:69cf::/64 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 20:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced content (map) by IP. Austronesier (talk) 21:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:53, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since at least 5 Mar, IPs have been changing the release date, contrary to the date shown in the reference. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Addition of spam links by anonymous IPs again and again. Yuugone (talk) 21:45, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 207.32.0.173 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repetitive vandalism and removal of sourced information. Simione001 (talk) 00:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Late 'Shah Maulana Abdul Majeed Chantgami (RA)' is a well-known person of our country. I request to open a Wikipedia page about this person. Robayethc (talk) 20:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Not doneUser has been directed to Bengali Wikipedia. Favonian (talk) 21:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. IP 67... has a valid point regarding this talk page. The disruptive talk page edits don't seem to be stopping anytime soon and happen about once a day and sometimes even require oversight ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

To add background, most of the disruption comes from single-edit IPs who are deluded that Wikipedia is Facebook and are using the talk page form to log in, or run a search, or get their accounts "unlocked." Often they post their phone numbers and possibly other sensitive info. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 05:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent BLP violation[15] similar to another BLP violation[16] by some IP user. Mann Mann (talk) 04:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No ongoing reason to protect. The page was protected in March 2013 after deleting the prior history due to persistent oversight issues at the time. The article was unprotected the following May and the last act of IP vandalism there was in July 2018. Fred Bauder is no longer an admin. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 02:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected. Nearly 10 years is long enough. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 05:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ArmyOnceBlinkMidzyalt (talk) 03:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 07:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see WP:LTA/AC. Untamed1910 (talk) 03:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 05:30, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Hello! In the past years there are many vandalism by IPs. Please add a protection to the page. OrionNimrod (talk) 10:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Another case of "Oh no! 2 bad edits were made to a page recently. I know there hasnt been other problems for years, but I don't care. THERE WAS 2 BAD EDITS!!!!!!!! We must cascade protect it." We don't protect pages for 2 bad edits in a day when there havent been bad edits in years/ Starship 24 (talk) 10:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Being repeatedly recreated by socks of WMF banned user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ByteOr. wizzito | say hello! 10:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 17:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Acroterion. Favonian (talk) 18:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Permanent extended confirmed protection (Israeli-Palestinian conflict). Ecrusized (talk) 07:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. — Maile (talk) 20:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – There have been multiple anti-trans edits over this last week after Anheuser-Busch announced that Dylan Mulvaney would be put on a Bud Light can. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 16:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

This could reasonably done as an arbitration enforcement action, as that content is covered by WP:CT/GG. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 17:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors displeased with a ref's performance today. Schazjmd (talk) 17:26, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 20:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – For at least several months (since November, at least), IPs have been trying to add birth date without citing reliable source(s) to verify.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 17:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper repeatedly vandalizing article. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – After protection of the page ceased 3 days ago, vandalism has returned to its pre-protection normal. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Starship 24 (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Regular attempts to insert uncited information about the ethnicity of the (child) suspect, trying to make this into a race-based event, despite reliable sources not doing so. CT55555(talk) 20:42, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 21:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

10 April 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 22:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 22:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs keep changing ignoring the hidden note to discuss before changing the nationality in the lead. JDDJS (talk to mesee what I've done) 14:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 22:10, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition (every couple of days) of unsourced information by the same ipv6 / 64 range. Maybe a couple of weeks semi-protection will see the editor get bored. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi protection; high level of ip disruption. Beshogur (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 22:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs removing sections of the page, but not fast enough for regular semi-protection (happens every now and then), hence asking for pending changes. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:17, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Semi-protected until 16 April. Last removal prior to 9 April was over three weeks before that, and three weeks before that. I don't think that this is a frequent enough level for pending-changes. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent financial vandalism. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:59, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 22:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I've removed a conflicting "not done" comment introduced here. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user, Editor MVM, is constantly adding POV content as well as glorifying honorifics, despite warnings. jojo@nthony (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Editor MVM (talk · contribs) blocked by Black Kite. Indefinitely blocked. — Maile (talk) 20:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 23:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism by insulting IP Aréat (talk) 06:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

The vandalims is by a single IP. That is not a reason to protect. That is a reason to report the IP to WP:ANI/Vandalism. Also, there have only been 2 bad edits, not even enough to warrant a block. Additionally, the edits were 5 years apart. I strongly oppose this page being protected. Dont shut out everyone for one bad actor who vandalizes once every 5 years.@Aréat Starship 24 (talk) 10:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done The offense was in the IP edit summary. I have removed it. — Maile (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One user, Editor MVM, is constantly adding POV content as well as glorifying honorifics, despite warnings. jojo@nthony (talk) 15:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 22:00, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mobile IP disruption. Zefr (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Just one IP at the moment, and seems to have stopped. But please re-report if there's IP hopping, etc. GoodnightmushTalk 21:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 19:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. GoodnightmushTalk 21:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Starship 24 (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 21:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Linked to on main page and had a bunch of vandalism Starship 24 (talk) 00:07, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. There is at least one disruptive edit a day. Being that this is on the main page, if it could be protected for a bit that would be good. Starship 24 (talk) 01:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Too much edit volume for PC, doesn't seem like enough of the edits are disruptive enough for semiprotection. GoodnightmushTalk 22:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I said pending changes, not semi @Goodnightmush Starship 24 (talk) 22:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement (WP:ARBIPA). Supporters keep changing the article to say he's president of Afghanistan, and now someone changed the infobox to say he's the "supreme leader" and "King of Panjshir". Enough. 25stargeneral (talk) 22:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 22:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Starship 24 (talk) 23:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Starship 24 (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This Person stays in controversies due to his controversial public statements continuously and people keep coming on this page to add/edit/delete things constantly. Kindly mark it protected for atleast 6 months or a year. --BeLucky (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs in recent edits to this article introducing changes that are not overall improvements, leading to run-on sentences in the prose (changing semicolons to commas) and some other MOS guideline violations. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:46, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple disruptive edits over the recent tabloid news; this is a biography and needs protection until the the intense tabloid frenzy clears up and reliable perennial sources emerge. ℛonherry 06:57, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

2 disruptive edits today, sure. Last disruptive edits after that is... January 2021. That was before the semi protection. You say persistent, but 2 bad edits in 1 day is not persistent, espically if the article was never really vandalized before that with the current protection. Starship 24 (talk) 10:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined. The information has been added by several extended-confirmed editors (Special:Diff/1148893675, Special:Diff/1148914502, Special:Diff/1149008315), so extended-confirmed protection would not have its desired effect. Edits by non-extended-confirmed editors have had around the same quality as those by extended-confirmed editors, with no vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: No reason that anyone should really be editing this. There has been some vandalism however Starship 24 (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 22:49, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
But there is real reason for there to ever be any good activity @Materialscientist Starship 24 (talk) 22:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
What does that mean, Starship 24? If you mean there is no real reason for there to be any good activity, then Wikipedia is built on the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes protection: Recent additions of events of questionable importance, such as hazing and oil spill in the Philippines (these may have significance in a Philippines-related timeline page, but not there). Requesting PC protection so additions of questionable value to the article could be filtered out. TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 22:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Euryalus (talk) 01:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP addresses are making wrong edits. Monhiroe (talk) 23:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

You mean Draft:Ponniyin Selvan: II, right? The mainspace article got kicked to draft after someone decided ignoring an AfD debate was a good idea. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 22:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done as mainspace page has been deleted and we're not yet at the "repeatedly recreated" stage sufficient to create-protect. However please re-report if this draft gets moved to mainspace again without significant improvement over previous versions. -- Euryalus (talk) 01:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Became a political topic, subject to low quality edits, vandalism, redacting true information. Hi! (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

I semi-protected it earlier today. Is there something that semi-protection is not handling? Acroterion (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Oh thanks. I was thinking a higher level, but it looks like the biggest changes were made by unregistered users so maybe no need. Hi! (talk) 02:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Most recent IP and new account edits have been about how NPR is being labeled on Twitter, mostly trying to force that labeling here as well. WCQuidditch 03:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent spamming over the last week. Could also try to hit 106.205.0.0/16 and 106.194.0.0/16 with partial blocks instead, but there's a good chance those will ultimately prove insufficient. Probably best to watchlist this one either way. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing and sock history Magherbin (talk) 02:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Aurelius5150 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours in response to an ANEW complaint over another article. Daniel Case (talk) 04:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Removal of content by user goes back to may 30th of last year Magherbin (talk) 08:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Aurelius5150 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 24 hours in response to ANEW complaint. Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: ECP'ed for 6 months last August due to disruption. Now IPs are back claiming that he is a historian (per "online consensus") and removing conspiracy theorist, both of which have been discussed many times on the talk page. ~StyyxTalk? 23:18, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Has been protected for 10+ years. I think it might be time to try unprotection/pending changes. I have already notified @Mr. Stradivarius: (the protecting admin) about this, but he has not edited in over a week, so bringing this up should be faster than awaiting his respose. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 21:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Important to note the amount of vandalism recieved with semi protection in Sept 2022 Starship 24 (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
This page was not protected in 2022. It was protected last in 2012, more than a decade ago. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
The protection was still in effect in 2022, however, per the logs and your own request. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 01:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, what I meant was, the protection was not put in effect in 2022, the protection was established in 2012. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment Seems like a reasonable WP:TRYUNPROT case. The individual proximally responsible for the protection has probably moved-on, though we call them long for a reason. Some isolated autoconfirmed disruption from last September is not so concerning as to preclude a try on its own. (Non-administrator comment) 74.73.224.126 (talk) 03:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected I've unprotected the page. It seems like a good candidate for pending changes, which wasn't available in November 2012 when I protected the page initially. I will monitor the page to see whether pending changes will be necessary. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ArmyOnceBlinkMidzyalt (talk) 03:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined @ArmyOnceBlinkMidzyalt: Sorry but it's hard to see why the edits are vandalism and there is nothing on article talk. Please post again with a couple of diffs and a brief explanation if the issue continues. Johnuniq (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Ok @Johnuniq ArmyOnceBlinkMidzyalt (talk) 09:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 05:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Every change so far has been vandalism by an IP or new editor. There's rarely a need for discussion on a talk page, especially by unregistered editors. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:31, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Then use semi-protection @Laterthanyouthink Starship 24 (talk) 11:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Okay, well whatever you think appropriate is fine by me, thanks. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article needs to get the same protection treatment as the likes of Nader Shah and Safavid Iran. Constant ethno-nationalistic disruption. It's never-ending. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Brand new users attempting to portray this language as "Punjabic" with zero sources, something done in the past by socks. I have already filed an SPI for one of them. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:14, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Starship 24 (talk) 00:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruption, often to do with the result of the battle. HistoryofIran (talk) 01:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. Despite of an IP edit warring. CastJared (talk) 06:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of continuous IP reverting and edit warring, plush sources removal and violation of BLP. TemPot Pee (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection (one week?) Ongoing IP vandalism SchroCat (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 14:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Anon users keep adding unsourced "TBA" release dates (this has been a long term problem). Mike Allen 15:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Continuous addition of several vandal IPs of a sidebar in the article violating MOS:SANDWICH. Super Ψ Dro 09:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Dislike of the Manual of Style is not vandalism. Sdrqaz (talk) 00:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
If they don't like how we do things at Wikipedia they shouldn't edit here. We shouldn't modify our articles because they don't like them. Super Ψ Dro 13:21, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. There are ways to avoid sandwiching here, for example. Also, be careful of violating WP:3RR. GoodnightmushTalk 14:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Also could be considered part of contentious topic (Ukraine War) Starship 24 (talk) 13:51, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 14:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just see it's edit history. Most of us are reverting it again and again to save it from disruption. Admantine123 (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of a year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism centered on their decisions as a referee. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – BLP violations have started again, only 2 days after the previous protection expired. Woodroar (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: SALT the earth - See WP:Requests for page protection/Decrease#Luan Muça; the user in question has also attempted to do end-runs around the page protection by moving the draft to the talk page. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Aoidh (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

RHaworth - two archive pages

Reason: So that I can edit them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Both Unprotected. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Mcdynamite (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. Partial block for 2 weeks. Favonian (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Dollismd (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 14:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Starship 24 (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ZLEA T\C 15:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Starship 24 (talk) 11:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:4040:4754:3100::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Starship 24 (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
14 reverts in the month isn't enough!? Then what is? @Bbb23 Starship 24 (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
There've been no edits to the article since April 5. The key word is recent.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: For some reason, this page has been a redirect to Wikipedia:Pending changes/Testing/8 for over 5 years. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 15:00, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
This is one of 10 testing pages to test pending changes protection, see for example Wikipedia:Pending changes/Testing/1. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting protection for this page, as edits are consistently being made based on unofficial sources. In the past few months, the page has been consistently edited and has broken Wikipedia:ESOPINION, as the edits made have primarily been based off of rumors, fan blogs, etc. Ferntheplant (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP hopper vandalizing / violating BLP. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Hello Team,

Please me to resolve problem with my page. I am trying to make a biography text for someone that is alive but after some request that I make I get Page protections,

Can you help me to fix this please.

Regards Bajramishpetim (talk) 13:39, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

@Bajramishpetim, I'm afraid the reason for the protection of that page is to prevent you (specifidcally, you) from moving the draft there. You should be working on the draft, not trying to work in article space. : Not unprotected Valereee (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected Valereee (talk) 14:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
@Bajramishpetim: Furthermore, your draft has been rejected, not just declined. That means you are done with it. You are not improving it, and it will never be accepted as it is, so you need to move on. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

11 April 2023

Reason: Lots of IP vandalism. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 18:55, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Maile (talk) 21:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 19:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Starship 24 (talk) 20:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I see no recent disruption to this article that would justify pending changes. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 23:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Filer also blocked for block evasion. Aoidh (talk) 02:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by socks of Heyoboyo SPI. MrOllie (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

100% agree. This has gotten out control. Starship 24 (talk) 21:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Continued IP vandalism, seemingly focused on the Mario Bros. movie. Sarina Kakusareta (talk | cont.) 22:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 05:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent disruptive editing. CJ-Moki (talk) 22:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I have also added two contentious topic notices to the talk page and logged this at AE. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: AfD article continually disruptive edited by COI and possible SP Maineartists (talk) 22:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. This is essentially Diw we are talking about, and while there might be a COI, this is not disruptive enough to lock down the whole article. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 10:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: editwarring long history of socking as well Magherbin (talk) 12:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: Warned disputants -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:07, 11 April 2023 (UTC):

Unprotection: Locked 13 years ago, with notation that it was locked until released. Appears to have been released. Please downgrade to semiprotection or ECP. ECP will permit review by reviewer. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Downgraded to ECP; courtesy @King of Hearts: Lectonar (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 08:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I don't see any reason why anyone besides Sakura emad should edit this page. Considering the persistent sockpuppetry in there, might as well protect. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Spam. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 09:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IP editors keep on making unsourced changes and adding jokes to the page. —  AP 499D25  (talk) 04:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Muboshgu. Favonian (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued vandalism after protection expired last week. – robertsky (talk) 08:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Endless string of IPs adding fantasy cast lists and other claims about Race 4 - a non-existant film - Arjayay (talk) 15:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and removal of sourced content by IPs. - Kevo327 (talk) 22:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Adding unsourced information. LancedSoul (talk) 23:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – repeated addition of non-NPOV content by IP users or very new users without gaining consensus on Talk page. Joeyconnick (talk) 00:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing Isi96 (talk) 06:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Endless WP:SEALIONing from his fans, trying to claim he is not a peddler of misinformation and pseudoscience. Dronebogus (talk) 11:40, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. This is a content dispute. Courcelles (talk) 15:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: multiple edits by vandal this AM BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 13:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

At least temporary semi-protection (maybe more?): Several accounts and IPs keep adding "and a nazi housewife" to the initial description of her; the last edit was left unreverted for almost an hour. There's a defamation case in Sweden where a person was recently found guilty of defamation for having called Hahne (a far-right tradwife) a nazi housewife and screenshots of the Wikipedia article with the nazi housewife addition are making small rounds on Swedish Twitter, so this might keep happening. /Julle (talk) 16:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Ongoing uncited edits to this BLP. CT55555(talk) 17:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced changes by IP users. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – I think this is a contentious topic (Ukraine war, BLP). Noting uncited allegations or arrest (since reverted) I think only EC users should edit this page anyway, so can we make that a minimum?. CT55555(talk) 17:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Since February, IPs have been trying to update the date of birth without citing any source(s). Activity has ramped up in April with at least 4 attempts. Suggest at least 3 months of semi.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The article has been protected for 12 years, experimental unprotection/pending changes should be tried. Protecting admin no longer active. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 01:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. This doesn’t have the escalating history I’d expect for an indef semi, nor the BLP grounds for a shortcut there, so let’s try PC.Courcelles (talk) 17:49, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

I'd like access to the following 19 pages to address the Tidy Font bug errors found within. I would additionally address the various other WP:Lint errors while there, as I have with similar (but more focused) past requests here and here in recent past weeks. Each of the following pages were either selfprotected by former admin (who are no longer due to inactivity, or were desyop'd), or these pages were protected by admin who are no longer admin, so asking the protecting admin prior to this request is not needed. I have Extended Confirmed access, so that or lower is fine, whatever is appropriate. If I have overlooked anything that would be an issue, happy to discuss or have a page struck from this request. Thank you. Zinnober9 (talk) 03:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Pages protected by other user:

Pages selfprotected by (now absent) exadmin users:

Pages selfprotected by exadmin users (not absent):

Semi-protected indefinitely. Give me a moment, and I’ll drop all these to semi. Courcelles (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. On Main page, there is 1 or 2 bad edits day. Needs to ge tunder control Starship 24 (talk) 23:17, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy- 03:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, eh?, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: while vandalism is only occasional, almost all edits from non-autoconfirmed editors are bad. lettherebedarklight晚安 09:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one edit this year, last 50 edits both constructive and not go back to 2017. Courcelles (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Incessant POV whitewashing by new editors. Hasn't had a neutral non-revert edit since March 23rd, and has been subject to drive-by "corrections" almost since it was created. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. CTOPS notice added to talk page and protection duly logged. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism and personal opinion editing. MatthewS. (talk) 06:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Recent vandalism from IP users - this time, they're replacing the year of the film's release with "2023". I have no idea why. At least a week to two months protection is warranted, because I'm certain these vandals will just continue unless the page is protected. TheVHSArtist (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There have previously been longer protections, but this seems sufficient for now. --Kinu t/c 20:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – He did well in the match yesterday, which is why multiple IP users are constantly reminding him about his caste, as seen by all the edits to this page today. DreamRimmer (talk) 18:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The article was already semiprotected for that duration, but it looks like that wasn't sufficient to quell the most recent vandalism. Kinu t/c 20:24, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Might it be a wise idea to invoke WP:GS/CASTE if this happens again? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 20:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC) 20:15, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Brand new (0 or few other edits) or IP editors keep making changes to the article (usually saying that one side in the battle or the other won) that ignore the what the sources used in the article actually say. When reverted they simply do it again. Ermenrich (talk) 20:48, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 21:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Edit war with unregistered user. They don't fully understand cats, I possibly don't understand their point. Fuddle (talk) 03:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits for over a day at this point. Daniel Case (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 20:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC) 20:17, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Courcelles (talk) 21:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The page has controversial things. It appears that the person who generated the page many years ago made it an autobiography. To protect the integrity of wikipedia, I believe the controversial content should be protected and then only removed if the sources are found to be false or inaccurate. 198.102.151.243 (talk) 20:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Policy requires we remove anything that is controversial and weakly-sourced. We cannot take a "sourced until proven otherwise" approach to biographical content about a living person. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 20:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
I would also strongly discourage you from blindly restoring content removed per WP:Biographies of living persons. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 21:20, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I've also blocked the OP for edit warring to replace this material. --Kinu t/c 21:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

12 April 2023

Reason: Random edits of photo that I uploaded under my name, being edited without my approval. MatthewS. (talk) 06:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined This file is on Commons. Protection can only b3 done by Commons admins, see Here to request their attention. Courcelles (talk) 15:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
I would also add that since this graph was uploaded under Creative Commons, you cannot restrict others from editing it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: writer used to update wrong information about person well we also have document about his current and previous political parties Darshilopes (talk) 19:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Having your edits reverted is not justification for protection. Kinu t/c 20:29, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dawnseeker2000 22:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:10, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Zsovar3 (talk) 23:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 00:12, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting semi-protection due to semi-often IP user vandalism. HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 15:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IP. Yuugone (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 00:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent block evasion and long-term sockpuppetry. 102.53.6.10 (talk) 18:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry for at least an year – See WP:LTA/AC. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:27, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism GuardianH (talk) 21:59, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:07, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated vandalism by some users to add maps when the edits were disputed in the talk page. No attempts by the vandals to engage in the talk page. Dingers5Days (talk) 00:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 00:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Semi didn't stop the disruption. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 01:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary move protection as since yesterday's news, editors are going back and forth between this article and X Corp. as to which should be the redirect. Funcrunch (talk) 23:56, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Move protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unsourced redirect overwriting. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent vandalism by unregistered users Ninevolt (talk) 04:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined @CastJared, Vestigium Leonis, and Saimcheeda: I'm hoping there will be no further edit warring and people will engage on article talk. Let me know if problems continue. Johnuniq (talk) 03:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Frequent MOS:ID violations. — SamX [talk · contribs · he/him] 04:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Action logged at Wikipedia:Arbitration enforcement log/2023#Gender and sexuality. --Kinu t/c 04:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism. –Vipz (talk) 04:57, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2 IP's (possible the same person since the edit summaries are similar) are edit warring over content that they feel should not be in the article.   ArcAngel   (talk) 02:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

@ArcAngel: The IP made a comment but Panian513 reverted it without explanation. The IP should not have used all-caps in the heading but the content of their comment needs to be addressed. Once that has happened, protection can occur. Johnuniq (talk) 03:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator Acroterion. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Hirolovesswords (talk) 03:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Euryalus (talk) 03:23, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Related to the Russia-Ukraine war, thus you have the ECP restriction that should be in place. interstatefive  03:35, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected--Ymblanter (talk) 06:43, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing resumed after recent protection log exipired. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 00:49, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Shifting IPs are removing sourced info on this fringe movement. Grayfell (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removals of copyvio revdel template and readditions of copyright-violating text, both obviously against policy. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since this driver was recently arrested on assault and strangulation charges, there have been numerous instances of vandalism on this article by multiple IP users. Areaseven (talk) 02:56, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IP. Karsan Chanda (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: One ip (180.150.37.213) vandalizing the page and doing the un-constructive edits on the page and it is not in good faith. XMANClass (talk) 04:58, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced death. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 00:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: Mooted. Sourced. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:39, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated politically-motivated vandalism from IP editors and new account editors. The IPs are from at least two parts of India, which suggests that several people are doing this.

There was batch of degrading edits on 12-13 March 2023 that were revdelled.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and new user vandalism. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:45, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous IP. Karsan Chanda (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined After reading said discussion: this is not a case for page-protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Unreferenced content. Numbers-Mathworld (talk) 10:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Not a reason for protection, see our protection policy. Also might be a case of so fix it Lectonar (talk) 10:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Could be referenced with A001146 (till 2^8,192). If you trim the table at the section 'Powers of two whose exponents are powers of two' to just 14 entries (2^1 to 2^8,192), request unprotection of the page 'Powers of two'. Numbers-Mathworld (talk) 10:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Ah...I misread then; please use an edit request on the talk-page of the article. Lectonar (talk) 10:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Pregnant Mizkonzodep (talk) 07:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined No page with that title. Lectonar (talk) 08:04, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to this page has continued and is likely to do so for the foreseeable future. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 13:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. An can someone with a clue about Aussie politics (I.e. not this American) ensure I scrubbed ALL the nonsense?Courcelles (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism Naraht (talk) 13:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism against the article. Raladic (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Same as Bradford/Bolton. Protected over a decade ago, experimental unprotection may need to be tried, recommend pending changes since this article is more notable than Bradford or Bolton. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 00:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

  • This is a core article, so I would decline it. I will leave open, but semi isn't stopping anyone from suggesting edits, and since accounts are free, it isn't stopping anyone serious from editing it. Core articles are routinely kept semi, for good reason, as the risk outweighs the reward on an article that is stable and still reasonably accessible. Dennis Brown - 02:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
  • I downgraded Bolton to pending-changes protection after a request here (and the article hasn't got any edits since, except for a thanks :) by the OP, so we're fine there), but Liverpool gets much more views than Bolton, and so would probably see much more disruption (more school pupils who have too much free time on their hands during breaks, e.g.). I also would leave the semi-protection in place. Lectonar (talk) 10:09, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Well, we do also have Birmingham, which is likely more well known than Liverpool but isn't protected, despite being the 2nd largest city in the UK. But if the consensus is to not unprotect, I accept that. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 11:06, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
I am not from the UK, but to me at least Liverpool is much better known than Birmingham. I would also guess that, globally, Liverpool is much more known than Birmingham, probably due to Football. Lectonar (talk) 11:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Fair enough. I am not a huge fan of football, and from what I can remember, I learned them both at around the same time, but I get that. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 11:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined See above. Lectonar (talk) 11:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring. SSSB (talk) 13:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Serious IP vandalism persists. While this vandalism isn't especially frequent, it is often grossly inappropriate (most recently: [17]). Vandalism / blatant POV edits by IPs make up a very high percentage of all edits to this page since January. Last semi was 6 months. Generalrelative (talk) 14:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Nearly all IP edits over the past year are crude vandalism, and the linked edit is not the worst of it. Indefinite protection would be in line with other similar topics that I will not name. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is occasionally vandalized or disrupted by IP or newly registered editors. Sanglahi86 (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page has false and misleading information which can damage reputation of 50 year old institution and distort the facts. When we tried to edit , it blocked the school IP. 103.158.120.113 (talk) 07:32, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – This page isn't currently protected.. I think this is a misunderstanding, you probably mean the article at Ramjas School, Pusa Road. Try searching for the page solely by its name, without the website markup -- Euryalus (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
I cleaned up it a bit, but the page is a mess...EL,COI,sourcing...you name it. Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 15:59, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Disruptive IP editing/ BLP violations ongoing. ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 16:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. George Ho (talk) 16:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:08, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing done by IPs. Apparently one of their talk pages say they were "cast" in the film and were blocked for that, and I'm a bit sure that they'll do it again once unblocked. Edwordo13 (talk) 16:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 17:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Frequent unsourced edits made by a very determined sock master using brand new accounts to reinstate edits when they are reverted.-- Ermenrich (talk) 17:54, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:15, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary or indefinite semi-protection: IPs continue to add the commissioning of the TCG Anadolu despite repeated explanations on precedence that ship commissionings are not newsworthy events. The Kip (talk) 02:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: meh...as long as we are not sure if the event is worthy of inclusion or not (and there's disagreement over that by established editors too). Better use a talk-page and hash it out. I wouldn't protect, but will break no sweat if someone does. Lectonar (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Edit war seems to be have died down anyway. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP-s revert-warring over stub and problem notices on the article. –Vipz (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 18:47, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism to BLP by numerous IPs following recent match. Egghead06 (talk) 19:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. By which point all this will be forgotten. Courcelles (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

I am the owner of the W.R. Bunckley house. I do not Generally use Wiki, but have noticed that the listing of my old home has the incorrect picture of the house. The photo listed is NOT the Bunckley house! The house shown is two houses down from its location. Please correct - If you will go to the National Register of Historic listings, type in W.R. Bunckley house, you will see that the incorrect house is shown on wiki. I would send you the correct photo, but don’t know how to on here. Just hate to see incorrect info. out there. Yaya1870 (talk) 19:10, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

In order to make the change we would need a photo of the proper house, ideally uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. We can't just cull the image directly from the National Register of Historic Places (and it doesn't help their photos of the house aren't digitised). —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:52, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
I have hidden the inaccurate image and tagged it at Wikimedia Commons. That image should be replaced with an accurate one if possible. The page isn't protected. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 14:18, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done@Yaya1870: The way forward is described above. Nothing more we can at this notice board. Favonian (talk) 16:13, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

13 April 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several reverted edits in the past day or so and a high risk of additional vandalism. Cat page is receiving higher than normal use after being linked in news articles & on twitter, as it is believed to be what twitter is using to determine what broadcasters are publicly funded. Tantomile (talk) 16:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:21, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant changing of view numbers. Dronebogus (talk) 18:44, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2003:e8:ef00::/40 (talk · contribs). Partial block for a month. Favonian (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Various and probably dynamic IPs keep adding Huxley is "far-left". This has been going on for some time. I propose a six months semi. Fama Clamosa (talk) 19:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long history of WP:NOTAFORUM violations by IPs/newly registered accounts. The trend started back up lately. Zoe Trent Fan🎤💍 17:24, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done. We almost never protect article talk pages, since they are important for communication between editors—see WP:ATPROT. At the current rate, I'm afraid "watchlist and revert" might have to be the solution, although it is weird that this is the one being targeted, out of all talk pages. Mz7 (talk) 01:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Don't get me wrong, what Mike Moon said is revolting, but it's not reliably sourced yet. Asking for ECP because there seems to be editing related to that from autoconfirned accounts. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 23:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Mz7 (talk) 01:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP user(s?) keep editing in "this really happened babies were kidnapped" citation: Trust me bro. Happy to expand the historicity debate section but citation needed etc. jengod (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. With only one instance this month, I don't think we need to protect the article at this time. Please feel free to re-report if the vandalism becomes more frequent. Mz7 (talk) 02:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Will do. TY. jengod (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: There is an edit war on the page for NPR over a designation of NPR as "state-run media" While I personally strongly disagree with the statement on a factual basis and think it violates both WP:NPOV and WP:RECENTISM, if there is further disagreement I think it will require moderation or admin attention. For now I believe the issue is preventing the current edit war from proceeding. I've reverted the page to the state before the edit war but the page needs added protection. The edit war has been going on since the 5th for anyone interested in the history. Bayou Tapestry (talk) 23:01, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done. The article is already semi-protected. I took a look, and I don't believe increasing the protection level is necessary at this time. I recommend participating in any relevant discussions on the article's talk page. If there are any specific editors that are violating the edit warring policy, they may be reported to WP:ANEW as appropriate (for now, I didn't immediately see anything requiring admin attention when I looked at the history). Mz7 (talk) 01:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
I appreciate the response Mz7. I don't see the semi-protected lock on the article though. Agreed it probably doesn't need anything more than semi-protection. Bayou Tapestry (talk) 03:54, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
@Bayou Tapestry: Ah, actually it expired just a couple hours ago. Please feel free to report again if the disruption continues. Mz7 (talk) 09:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page has been protected for how many times now. But after the protection expires, IP users tend to come back and vandal the article again and again. I'm requesting for a higher protection for this page since it appears to be a target of IP users to vandal everytime it's protection expires. Good day. Mr. Kenshin (talk) 05:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: as before, now again. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The article was protected until April 6, on April 7 edit warring resumed. The argument is about whether to include allegations of sexual harassment in this BLP or not. Random person no 362478479 (talk) 12:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 12:22, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptions. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 05:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 14:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs and registered accounts adding unsourced information and is increasing rapidly. – Meena10:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Will120 (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. All this is getting is nonsense and people looking for other pages. Courcelles (talk) 14:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs continually adding WP:SPECULATION about who will host the event. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Can be lifted early if sourced information becomes available. Courcelles (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi- pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Sheep (talkhe/him) 13:39, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 13:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jetstreamer Talk 10:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and constant removal of sourced content as the subject of the article got arrested. Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello respected sir, can you increase the protection for nearly 3-4 weeks as the subject who got arrested is a very high profile case and the page would be constantly vandalised even if the protection is removed after 3 days. Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The page is consistently vandalized by IP users, usually at least weekly. Would it be possible to get an extended semi-protection? Hey man im josh (talk) 15:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let’s take the next two seasons off this nonsense. Courcelles (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No recent vandalism activity and not such popular page to require indefinite semi-protection. 2A02:85F:F039:CD81:784A:B32A:F0A4:747D (talk) 21:27, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected. Looks like a paperwork snafu a decade ago in the PC trial. Courcelles (talk) 14:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopping to add blatant false information into the whole article. Mike Allen 17:47, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: WP:BLPPRIVACY - see talk page. I reverted IP user: WP:NOR; real name not public per reliable sources. Talk:Rezo is full of threads regarding discussion of birthname mentioning since 2019. -- JD {æ} 17:59, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Aoidh (talk) 18:20, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Information in personal section is not accurate. MountainMan33 (talk) 13:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Courcelles (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of discrimination. Ernestodlopez (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 16:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent page history on article of this politician is positively full of white-washing sock puppets. MrOllie (talk) 19:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. Favonian (talk) 19:29, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: See points I made when I asked the protecting admin (who, after almost a day, did not respond.) TLDR: full protection seems unnecessary as no extended-confirmed editors edited disruptively, so I think ECP would be better. interstatefive  00:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined The administrator has responded. Bbb23 (talk) 16:08, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs trying to add birth date without citing source(s).  — Archer1234 (t·c) 20:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:17, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued IP disruption. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 21:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: it's been years since this was last vandalised. And also the dabpage needs to be moved to the base title. And the protecting admin hasn't been an admin for years either. Thank you. Dr. Vogel (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

UnprotectedFavonian (talk) 19:42, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

14 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lots of IP shenanigans - should be done soon when Ramadan is over (until next year). Iskandar323 (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. DatGuyTalkContribs 20:00, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Same user repeatedly enters the following information on history: "Oak Hall was founded in 1970, the same year that Gainesville finished desegregation of their high schools." This is incorrect and defamatory. Is there any way to block this user, who keeps posting this? 70.169.187.70 (talk) 19:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Favonian (talk) 19:37, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Due to recent vandalisim, I'm requesting that this page should be protected to unregistered users and users that have <10 edits and is less than <4 days old. RandomWikiPerson_277talk page or something 20:18, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 64.125.144.30 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Good idea to place this page on semi-protection as vandals could edit this vandal counter itself which is transcluded onto my userpage and talk page. I would rather have it semi-protected as most of the users who would revert any vandalism on my talk page use something like Twinkle, which requires autoconfirmed+ to use. Wesoree (Talk) 01:41, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 02:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: There was a protracted sequence of page vandalism in 2010, which lead to page protection. The vandalism was not due to a dispute, or to anything subtle; it was childish name-calling about some unknown 3rd person. It's now 13 years later. The article is on an obscure physics topic. It's a stub that has not grown in the intervening years. I think it can be safely unprotected; the chances of renewed vandalism is ... infinitessimal. No greater than that for any other physics or math stub article. 107.204.27.161 (talk) 23:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected -- Euryalus (talk) 23:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Linty Old Socks

(Individual pages):

(Group1, same person, two accounts):

(Group2, identical admin's signature issue, no connections otherwise):

These pages are long ago blocked sock account pages (2006 and before). I'd like protection reduced so I can address the Tidy Font bugs and other lint errors on each page. Group 1 is the same person. Group 2 has the same blocking admin's signature, but no connections to each other otherwise. If any in Group 2 are problematic for a decrease, those can be moved to a change X to Y request instead since it's a simple correction.

  • (note) I plan on blanking Sugarpine's Sandbox page, since it's just tests of their signature and has no other significance. It could also be blanked on my behalf without changing protections if you prefer. But, if you object to it being blanked, I will honor that objection and correct the syntax instead. Just specify.


Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected. Dropped all to EC. Courcelles (talk) 01:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent tampering of the box office number in the infobox by various IPs. —  AP 499D25  (talk) 04:30, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected as target of sockfarm. Sockfarm is now back and vandalising page. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 04:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected as target of sockfarm. Sockfarm is now back and vandalising page. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 04:48, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of a sockfarm. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 04:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very frequent target of a sockfarm. Previously protected but now being vandalised again. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 04:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected as target of sockfarm. Sockfarm is now back and vandalising page. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 04:50, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been subjected to repeated vandalism from IP addresses and new users since at least May 2022. Please see https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Barfi&action=history

Thank you. Ram1751 (talk) 21:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 02:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. From the looks of it, it's probably necessary to protect this until the playoffs end. --Kinu t/c 04:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, addition of unsourced content. —  AP 499D25  (talk) 03:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 04:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Almost none of IP edits have been constructive. I see spam after spam from time to time. George Ho (talk) 00:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Mz7 (talk) 07:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Re-addition of unsourced content have begun soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Severe BLP violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 07:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There have been a significant number of reversions in the past 72hours involving the lead and the reception section with many editors just edit-warring rather than gaining consensus on the talk page. Recommending EP as most editors are not SPAs. Kcmastrpc (talk) 23:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

New user of Twinkle, sorry for mangling this request. Kcmastrpc (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined. @Kcmastrpc: To be clear, I'm understanding you to be requesting protection on the actual article The Super Mario Bros. Movie and not its talk page. That article is already semi-protected, and I'm not sure I see enough disruptive activity on the article to warrant extended-confirmed protection. Mz7 (talk) 07:51, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Removal of sourced content and attempt to push pov by autoconfirmed users. Need ECP. Admantine123 (talk) 06:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This was essentially one occurence in the last weeks; better to deal with single users on a one-by-one base than to completely block off a whole page. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent distruptive editing – IPs repeatedly attempting to change the budget/gross for a film without citing sources.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 10:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:52, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced / irrelevant content by IP editors. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ever since User:Dollismd was blocked for edit warring (including in this article, and largely over the POV use of the term "supermodel"), an ever-growing list of IPs and one-and-done accounts has carried on the POV campaign. Each time an experienced editor reverts one of these users, another pops up. Mbinebri (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. — Manticore 12:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:08, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected. Courcelles (talk) 12:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Since at least Nov. 2022, IPs have been attempting to add birth date without sourcing.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 12:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:53, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined It’s already series until September. Nothing needs doing now. Courcelles (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 12:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Courcelles (talk) 12:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:38, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Courcelles (talk) 12:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Courcelles (talk) 13:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Courcelles (talk) 13:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Courcelles (talk) 13:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement, post-1992 U.S. politics. Kyle Idleman (talk) 12:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Courcelles (talk) 12:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite protection: Persistent and egregious vandalism and long-term abuse despite multiple protections. Kyle Idleman (talk) 13:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: this page is prone to vandalism due to recent attack mailbox ads citing wikipedia as an official source for "pro life voting records", causing reverting and editing. Hansenxyz (talk) 14:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:54, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Recently unprotected, vandalism restarted, BLP. CT55555(talk) 15:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every edit to this talk page since December has been reverted. Nearly all of it has come from unregistered editors. Could we reduce the workload for RecentChanges patrollers by semi-protecting the page for a couple of months?. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:20, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:25, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Someone has an ip address trying to veneration and claim of his theory, based on a point of view, exaggeration and attributing facts. It would be best to protect the article because I think he will never stop Sarah Schneuwly -Schneider (talk) 22:04, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

WP:GS/RUSUKR enforcement: Indefinite ECP requested due to anon participation. RAN1 (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Opposed! Why should an AfD be protected to stop "anon" (presumed meaning "non-logging" participation)? By what argument, based on WP policy and history, does one create second class citizens of non-logging editors, in particular when the site has all the tools it needs to prevent sockpuppeting that might lead to repeat voting by unregistered editors? If one wishes to bias votes, one can as easily create multiple accounts, as hop from IP to IP to repeat vote. Note, I voted there once, and commented repeatedly—but in no case in violation of any WP: policy or guideline. Why should this voice, this scholarly voice, not be heard in that deletion debate? Jimbo certainly would have allowed it back in the day. One's bias, based in personal annoyance with those who choose participatory paths other than the usual, should not rule the day in this regard. 2601:246:C700:F5:FD87:5034:59D4:3581 (talk) 20:15, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure ECP protection is warranted here, given the explicit Talk namespace exemption? This GS has only been used on an AfD once before.
Could some solution involving edit requests on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jack Teixeira work? The six days remaining of discussion probably aren't going to be AS eventful as the first, but blanket excluding IP users is less than ideal. casualdejekyll 20:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely., WP:GS/RUSUKR is quite clear that non-ECP editors are not welcome in AfD discussions concerning the topic. My understanding is also that the provision for "internal project discussions" in GS/RUSUKR Remedy A1 includes meta-discussions of whether or not to enforce GS/RUSUKR provisions. signed, Rosguill talk 21:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Students from local high school are vandalizing the Wikipedia page. Please undo these edits and block the IPs, and protect the page. LunaIsNotABoy (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

I'd like to note that I am a student assisting the teacher in question in cleaning this up. The IP who made the edit yesterday is an IP to our school and should be blocked. LunaIsNotABoy (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent pov pushing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of disruption from various IPs over the past week.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 20:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:44, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

15 April 2023

Reason: Recent level of vandalism from both IP's and accounts (most likely sockpuppetry) Extended confirmed protection? Pyramids09 (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Request to upgrade protection to Extended confirmed protection, to registered users with at least 30 days tenure and at least 500 edits, disruption continues to be done so by random IP's and new users who add false information and/or images. Already a contentious topic as stated on the banners of the talk page in relation to the Syrian Civil War, ISIL, post-1978 Iranian politics. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Both reporter and Plumbobar for 72 hours for violating 1RR on a contentious topic, as noted. Will log. Daniel Case (talk) 22:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: In the XG page description column, XGALX is not a subsidiary of AVEX, but a company in collaboration with AVEX, and in this regard, annotated an interview with Jakops, the CEO of XGALX. However, the other party is constantly undermining the document by using the expression AVEX's subsidiary without any source. Request document protection for this. 秋元1223 (talk) 16:32, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. You started a discussion on the talk page; let's see how that works out. Daniel Case (talk) 22:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Page is still experiencing vandalism, and I have doubts it will stop soon, as the semi-protection was evaded. - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 22:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: I watch the page incase more pop up -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! - L'Mainerque - (Disturb my slumber) - 22:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: In the XG page description section, XGALX is a company that collaborates with AVEX, not a subsidiary of AVEX, and despite annotating an interview with XGALX CEO Jakops, the other party continues to use the term AVEX's subsidiary without any source to undermine the document. Request document protection for this. 秋元1223 (talk) 05:36, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. –Vipz (talk) 06:31, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 06:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 07:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of disruptive editing by a Chile-based dynamic IP who keeps changing citation titles/headlines without explanation, hidden behind partially-accurate edit summaries, and denies that they have done this. They have been warned repeatedly over several months. Too many different IPs for range blocks, and by the time ST47ProxyBot catches them, they've moved on.

Also: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks, Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 08:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 190.21.160.0/19 (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 09:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 09:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
DoneFantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald received less disruption, and the range block should hopefully suffice. Will monitor. Favonian (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

I wanted to add more details for Droupathi Murmu, such as, editing the page text to also include that she belongs to the Santhal Tribe. I also wish to add her previous job occupations as a school teacher, a junior assistant for Secretariat of Odisha, and as a ward councillor. RandomPenguin24 (talk) 13:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You can request this edit on Talk:Droupadi Murmu. Please bear in mind part of your edit falls under WP:GS/CASTE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 09:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

In the XG page description section, XGALX is a company that collaborates with AVEX, not a subsidiary of AVEX, and despite annotating an interview with XGALX CEO Jakops, the other party continues to use the term AVEX's subsidiary without any source to undermine the document. Request document protection for this. 秋元1223 (talk) 16:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Try making a formal edit request on Talk:XG (group), rather than tacking your request onto the end of an unrelated discussion from August of last year. (The part seeking increased protection level is out of scope here, but this has also been filed at WP:RFPP/I.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you ^^ 秋元1223 (talk) 05:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 09:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IP editors are eager to assign this NFL draft prospect to a team before the draft happens. Could it be protected until April 27, when the draft begins? (He's expected to be the first picked.). Schazjmd (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of April 27, 2023, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection. Subject is a famous footballer going through a divorce as well as having a sexual misconduct allegation against him. IPs are using the opportunity of the unprotected page to post alleged porn and other gross BLP violations and vandalism. Trillfendi (talk) 14:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Nothing but block evasion/drive-by vandalism in the past week. Also to note a user is bypassing the blue lock so it appears to not be working. 174.83.6.129 (talk) 11:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: I'll watch for more of that -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi protection: Roxy (talk · contribs) edit warring by placing a cn tag to the article name in bold, which is obvious a commonname, and appears on bibliography of th article several times, which falls under WP:SKYISBLUE. Beshogur (talk) 11:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

The sentence to which I placed a cn tag specifically states that Yūsuf Balasaguni is the most common name, but any citation to prove that has yet to be seen in the article. You have stated that it appears on bibliography several times but appearing several times may not be enough to say it is the most common one as it can easily be seen that he goes by the name Yusuf Khass Hajib in many other wikis, which makes it not Wikipedia:SKYISBLUE. Roxy (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Maybe you should open a requested move if you don't think it's the most common name. I myself didn't move to (or create) Yūsuf Balasaguni. You should provide evidence that's it's not most common. If it is, then there shouldn't be cn tag. Beshogur (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IPv6 bouncing around, and a newly registered account, both adding BLP violations. Interleaved edits. — Trey Maturin 14:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

 Done Protected by Zzuuzz for two weeks, with thanks. — Trey Maturin 14:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. For the bot. Favonian (talk) 16:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 17:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Reinstate semi-protection - IP editors are adding unsourced caste-related claims/content. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 18:19, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator DatGuy. General sanctions enforcement-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent and long running Edit warring from unregistered users (Mostly about DC Comics for some reason) Silverleaf81 (talk) 18:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mifter (talk) 18:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Dear Administrator, I have created a page about the Georgian Architect Simon Kintsurashvili. I also created a Georgian version of it ka.wikipedia.org/wiki/სიმონ_კინწურაშვილი in Georgian Wikipedia, where a user called გიო_ოქრო, wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:გიო_ოქრო

was re-editing the page with a political connotation and was reporting me as a vandal when I was trying to edit further my page. He also entered this English version and tried to edit it. I want him to be blocked from editing this page as well as if you can help me to remove the Georgian version of the article: ka.wikipedia.org/wiki/სიმონ_კინწურაშვილი

O,r at least to block him from editing the page. As administrators in Georgia Wikipedia were not helpful.

Thank you very much for your attention! Transmodernism (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Sorry, but administrators on the English-language Wikipedia have no authority on the other Wikipediae, and the editor to whom you are referring does not appear to have edited disruptively here. Favonian (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your answer Favonian. Can the page be protected, to prevent further misappropriation? Transmodernism (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, again, but we don't protect articles preemptively. Favonian (talk) 16:30, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. FMSky (talk) 18:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism Zingo156 (talk) 19:14, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: low grade, but persistent -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism just before our convention (we reverted the changes) 174.117.162.53 (talk) 15:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: User adding incorrect information Magherbin (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism resumed after previous protections ended. Sahaib (talk) 19:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Consistent re-creation by COI editor, over the course of years. Onel5969 TT me 11:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Semi-protection will have no effect, as the editor in question is auto-confirmed. Take the article to WP:AFD to get a decision on the notability of the subject. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I would request to increase the protection of the page as the subject of the article was recently shot and died Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Current semi-protection appears to hold the fort. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Slow editwarring by IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedAlready reported to WP:ANEW. Favonian (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Newbie is not getting it, keeps adding images to the top of the page, see talk. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:23, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined - Page protection is not used for single user disruption DatGuyTalkContribs 18:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Single-purpose account(Special:Contributions/Ratpie) repeatedly page-move wars without consensus. Rastinition (talk) 20:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: actually, I move protected the other spelling -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:38, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Done – Article move-protected at Dimash Kudaibergen. Move discussion in progress at Talk:Dimash Kudaibergen#Requested move 15 April 2023. Favonian (talk) 21:24, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: This seems excessive and needlessly escalatory. I helped to diffuse the impending edit war days back, and the issue has been being discussed, calmly, at the relevant talk page ever since. There has been no dispute raised on the substance of the move, only based on a misunderstanding of what process is needed for the move. Ratpie has perhaps moved a bit quickly, but nothing outside of the bounds of Being Bold, and Ratpie has referred to which instructions they were operating under while the other editor kept referring to instructions that were explicitly not applicable. It's now marked as protected "for vandalism", while no-one has claimed vandalism, which can give a detrimental impression of what has transpired. While I believe the one editor is mistaken and the other overeager, I have not seen any indication that either side has acted inappropriately here. Gecko G (talk) 22:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Be that as it may. There's nothing more can be done at this notice board. In a week, the discussion will presumably have yielded a result. Favonian (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

@Gecko G: Oh, I see thanks. I misclicked. Should be for move warring. Fixed.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks again. The move war was old. So unprotecting. Why someone request protection today is beyond me. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
That is to say, unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... As Samuel L. Jackson would say. Favonian (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page has been subjected to repeated vandalism by IP addresses and new users since at least August 2022. Please see: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Lassi&action=history Thank you. Ram1751 (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:02, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Khirurg (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:58, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs are consistently removing LaTocha Scott as an active member of the group without sources. I have yet to find a single source saying she is not a current member of the group, with some supporting her still being in the group, and the most I've seen is her being distanced. I have gone over this in edit summaries, and asked a question about it on the talk page, with no answers. I am not opposed to removing her as a member if there are sources, but there aren't any that I have seen, and IPs keep trying to remove her without providing any. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:54, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Consistent adding of unsourced information after previous protection expired. IP's keep changing damage and death toll with no source and in direct disagreement of NHC TCR. Infinity (talk - contributions) 21:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

16 April 2023

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too many people adding information and maps that are either fake or not confirmed. Wikieditor019 (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm not seeing much in the history supporting this. Daniel Case (talk) 22:48, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: People everytime changes Wikipedia page , so protect it from vandalism 2405:201:5C09:E129:F453:5A76:DAD2:D173 (talk) 19:53, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined That's how it's supposed to work. Daniel Case (talk) 22:49, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The disruption has been ramping up in this article, which already had such issues to begin with. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism and addition of non-relevant content, even with pending changes protection Jennytacular (talk) 00:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 00:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP user is back with the same wrong edits it was reported last week. Guilherme (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Euryalus (talk) 02:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Wrongful, Harmful and Misleading information 217.72.122.83 (talk) 23:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 23:12, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The incident regarding this ship happened around 3 years ago. With COVID no longer as bad as it was in 2020, as well as the fact that this ship is no longer under quarantine, this article does not need protection. 173.167.177.193 (talk) 00:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

This isn't an option - this was protected via GS/COVID, which would be taken over by the Arbitration Committee and made a contentious topic. As such, this cannot be unilaterally overturned and must be appealed at either ARCA or at AE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 00:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Yeah... I'll pass on filing an ArbCom report. Aside from the fact I would get turned down instantly, i'm not going to bring myself to that cesspool. Thanks anyway, 173.167.177.193 (talk) 00:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure Jéské is correct here: under the new contentious topics procedures, page protections become reversible by any admin after a year (and this applies retroactively). But either way, Not unprotected for now: since the protecting admin is still active, the first step (per the message at the top of the page) is to discuss it with him at User talk:El C. Feel free to come back here if you don't get a response. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
The main reason I didn't post on his talk page was because I noticed he hasn't edited in over a week, but I posted at his talk page now anyways. 173.167.177.193 (talk) 00:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 02:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.. Remaining single recent IP edit is not enough activity to warrant page protection -- Euryalus (talk) 02:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 02:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Euryalus (talk) 02:28, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Also left a note for the IP editor re edit-warring. -- Euryalus (talk) 02:32, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Protected for 15 years, experimental unprotection may need to be tried. Protecting admin no longer active. 173.167.177.193 (talk) 21:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected No, anyone can see how that will go… it’ll end up bothering the Oversighters with work. Courcelles (talk) 00:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Return of persistent and egregious vandalism and BLP violations immediately after previous protection expired. Doeren (talk) 03:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Return of persistent and egregious vandalism and BLP violations immediately after previous protection expired. Doeren (talk) 03:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 06:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Can we get a three day protection here? I see a two-way dispute many times over here. I took a glance and since I would probably split the difference on the disputed wording, it might be best just to let the article rest three days while I start a topic on the talk page for these two editors. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:56, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Protection ended today, I suspect disruptive edits will continue unless this page is semi-protected again. MosheeYoshee (talk) 20:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: Write now I see a content dispute. Warned disputants -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
To whom should we write? Daniel Case (talk) 22:50, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
write on, man! -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Total write-off! Favonian (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:03, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Burger Chef articles

Reason: Both articles were protected indefinitely three years ago after having been attacked by an LTA. What is unusual is that both articles were protected indefinitely (rather than temporarily) after having been attacked by only one or two accounts, both with previously clean protection logs. As a result, I think experimental unprotection should be tried to see if the troll is gone. 173.167.177.193 (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Pinging @El C: as the protecting admin, something I forgot to do beforehand. 173.167.177.193 (talk) 21:37, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Already unprotected by administrator El C. Favonian (talk) 12:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Excessive edit warring by an IP and two novice editors (also see ANI discussion). SHB2000 (talk) 05:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – The article's edit history has been calm for two days, while ANI and SPI have been abuzz with spoilers. This AGFing admin wants to believe. Do you know what happened in last week's episode of Succession? Favonian (talk) 11:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP and new user vandalism (most commonly by adding various K-pop groups to the lede of the article without consensus, but also just instances of unexplained content removal) :3 F4U (they/it) 08:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 11:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of always the same IP-vandalism - removal of the same sourced material.
Der HON (talk) 10:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Der HON, please avoid edit summaries such as Special:Diff/1146879434. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Understood. I am sorry, but I totally lost my nerves that day. It's just not understandable how people can not read edit summaries (or simply ignore them?) and then keep on vandalizing airport destination content. At some point they must be figuring out that almost any of their edits is being reverted, but they just keep going. There is (or was) an API investigation about this airport dest. case already.
Der HON (talk) 11:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
No worries. A better way to reach the editor may be starting a short article talk page discussion and sending {{Please see}} to their user talk page as quickly after such edits as possible, to trigger a notification they'd otherwise not receive. This assumes that they're not actively ignoring you, though, and I have to admit that this assumption is quite a stretch. Still, as this is technically a content dispute, you may need to try this to stay compliant with the policy against edit warring as far as possible. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Chaudhry Bostan Khan Zaildar

Chaudhry Bostan Khan Zaildar was appointed as a Zaildar of Punjab, Pakistan based on 84 villages of Rawalpindi & Islamabad Zail. He was the only landlord of that District. His best quality was that he used to listen to the problems of the public in a Diwan on regular basis in his village Kotha Kalan. Later his son Chaudhary Lal Khan contested in local body elections & became Chairman four times non-stop & Got the title of “Baba-e-Baldiyat” By the Government of Pakistan. He was also elected as a member of the district council of Rawalpindi, Pakistan. Mindthegap7 (talk) 04:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Remember to include reliable sources for your claim. Favonian (talk) 10:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent annoyance by probable sock. Onel5969 TT me 14:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Though the most recent IP has been blocked. Courcelles (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent disruption by IP editors removing the subjects title of nobility. At least one of these editors at one point claimed to be the subject of the article, hence the violation of BLP. Apart from one ip editor making the same change, all of the others only made that change to this article and hence I fear they could be sockpuppets, extending the BLP violation. Estar8806 (talk) 16:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tommi1986 let's talk! 16:48, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator ToBeFree. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring over summary of critics' reception of this film. Edit warriors include an account with ~100 edits, so am requesting ECP.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 14:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not really seeing anything that's overwhelming the page. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Protection of Important information Eggman1112 (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. No, you won't get to add your non-notable micronation. Acroterion (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued infobox image vandalism. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A few edits today does not equal "persistent". Daniel Case (talk) 18:02, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: No longer necessary Eggman1112 (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

So you vcn add your non-notable micronation? No. Please stop asking.. Acroterion (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected Favonian (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Fandom see [18]. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 22:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: To avoid vandalism issues, despite there being none. (I recently fixed my page, to make it look neat, so the better something is, the more vulnerable it can be to be a vandalism target) 🄼🄾🄳 🄲🅁🄴🄰🅃🄾🅁 (talk) 21:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 22:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Looks like MusikBot II [presumably] malfunctioned and semi-protected this sandbox a while ago, claiming it had 2206 transclusions. Even if it did actually have that many transclusions once, it currently has only 23. {{Lemondoge|Talk|Contributions}} 21:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected I imagine protecting the template sandbox was a mistake. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

17 April 2023

Reason: Persistent sockpuppetry; continued after previous protection period recently expired. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 19:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent edit history merits considering page protection considering IP involvement in promo editing.  // Timothy :: talk  21:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Page was protected in 2012 due to repeated recreation. I am a good-faith editor in good standing and have translated the zh.wiki page as Draft:Benzinga. Admin who protected the page was administratively de-sysopped on 1 September 2021. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected I’m unsure the draft would survive AFD, but that’s not the standard here. Courcelles (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism of the page. Raladic (talk) 01:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 03:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC) 03:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. signed, Rosguill talk 05:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: Indeff protected for sockpuppetry in 2018. The sockpuppets appear to have stopped so this can be unprotected. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 23:41, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: This page is not protected? Courcelles (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
This page has never been indef-protected (and its last protection has long since expired), and BBC News is under a long-term (not indefinite - it expires 2027) semi-protection that was issued last August. BBC News (international TV channel) is indef CRASHlocked, BBC News Online hasn't been protected since 2017, and of the three time-slot articles, only BBC News at Six is under any sort of protection at all (CRASHlock). The disambiguation page has never been protected. There's no article here, other than ...at Six, BBC News, and the international TV channel article, that could even be unprotected here, and the CRASHlocked articles, due to how that works, don't prevent anonymous editing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 00:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done because there is nothing to do, the page isn't protected, or the request referred to the wrong article. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
The page is currently indefinitely pending changes protected. I am not sure what you cannot see. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Ah, that I missed. I think part of the reason we overlooked it is because of how soft CRASHlock actually is (it doesn't prevent IP editing) and the fact that there're a few other entries after it in the protection log. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 02:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: edit warring. mediafanatic17 talk 20:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – See history and hidden note a birthdate parameter. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 22:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

@Ohnoitsjamie: Cool, Thank you, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Recurring vandalism 77.97.192.37 (talk) 07:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:28, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism to prevent any discussion of possible dangers of this breed, which is a kind of pit bull. Need to provide a balanced view, both that animals can be kind and loving and also, sometimes, potentially quite dangerous. Veritas Aeterna (talk) 01:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. last IP edit days ago; I see some disagreements over content...the talk-page is your friend. Lectonar (talk) 07:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent unsourced edits by IP editor, the edit was disproved and reverted by multiple editors. Ckfasdf (talk) 08:18, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – There are a lot of unsourced and unverified edits made by various IP users. DDMS123 (talk) 09:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The film is released and has sources. So, this page can now be pblished. Assameseboy (talk) 07:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft's sources are not particularly good. Bookmyshow is never an acceptable source (too sparse) and we can't use the Times of India article (too sparse). The article in The Hindu cannot in and of itself support the article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 07:20, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined Once the draft is ready to be accepted, we can unprotect. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by dynamic IP. LDM2003 (talk) 08:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: User Anonymous change to largest city from Bekasi to Bandung had attemped many times Baqotun0023 (talk) 10:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP keeps removing sourced information about a former team from infobox RedPatch (talk) 10:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Persistent disruption including BLP violations as well as vandalism, chronic issue with the article. TylerBurden (talk) 11:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:36, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP disruptive editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 21:35, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours. , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 12:33, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. -- Leonidlednev ( T | C ) 01:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 03:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:58, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page is needed high level protection bcoz Dhirendra Singh bundela adding Kshatriya and Suryavanshi to Ahirwar and Chamar related pages. It is also needed to block this person bcoz he doing with other Wikipedia pages related to Chamar caste. Twomonths (talk) 08:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 09:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP editors keep adding random words like "Tushan World records" or "german Shepherd" See diffs here- [19],[20],[21], [22]. Bingobro (Chat) 07:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Increasing amounts of IP vandalism MrEarlGray (talk) 14:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This just came off a 3 day protection for a series of copyright violations from sock puppets. As soon as protection ended copyright violations immediately resumed. MrOllie (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated vandalism to change the script image file. New editing by User:हम भोजपुरी could be related to abuse by User:लोहार and other blocked accounts which are prolific on Commons in overwriting image files all over the place. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No issues for over 2 weeks. But please re-report if it continues. GoodnightmushTalk 12:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper adding POV controversy section after being reverted and explained why multiple times. No discussion on their part. Mike Allen 22:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. GoodnightmushTalk 12:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple unregistered users are changing population information based on one BBC article. These articles use a different population definition. To change the standard definition consensus is required on Talk page. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 07:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined PC seems to be working here to keep these changes unpublished Courcelles (talk) 12:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. The Night Watch (talk) 18:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: We have update content on page. Bajramishpetim (talk) 15:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

X Karanmisrakhan (talk) 11:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done – Vacuous (in every sense of the word) request. Favonian (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 05:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Euryalus. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:59, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Leonidlednev ( T | C ) 18:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:02, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -- Leonidlednev ( T | C ) 19:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Sixteen Various Linty pages

(following are self protected pages, inactive ex-admin)

(Following three pages can be simple "change X to Y" requests if preferred)

I'd like access to these 16 pages to address the lint errors as I've done for other pages recently. This is the final set of pages in User namespace with full protection that have Tidy Font errors (I'm ignoring the 24 current admin pages). If any of these 16 pages should be temporary decreases, I can focus on those first and contact you when I'm done with those. Contacting the protecting admin not needed for these (protectors no longer admin for the various reasons stated). Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

@Courcelles: Thank you for the first two. Are you still considering the others, or are they unavailable? Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 16:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I got distracted in real life and forgot... I'll do the rest. Courcelles (talk) 18:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 18:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 20:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – There appears to be an ongoing content dispute regarding BLP around a WP:BLPCRIME of a WP:PUBLICFIGURE. Raladic (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Less Unless (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 00:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Less Unless (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of Vandalism throughout April Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:46, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs and from User:MicroWaveMonkey. TheXuitts (talk) 19:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. invoking WP:ARBGC. Courcelles (talk) 20:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Immediate resumption of sockpuppetry within two days of the prior (months-long) ECP expiring. Aoi (青い) (talk) 20:39, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Not seeing enough accounts to go to ECP. Courcelles (talk) 20:45, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent infobox image vandalism (Second report). - FlightTime (open channel) 16:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting EC protection for AfD discussion regarding recent article on History of Israel (1948–present) according to active arbitration remedies for topics related to Arab–Israeli conflict Ppt91talk 16:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Mooted. AfD closed as speedy keep/ -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 22:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by IP hopping editor. Squeakachu (talk) 18:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 21:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Several IP's of User:MakaveliReed has been changing the release date of Who's Real and it is currently ongoing. Untamed1910 (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

18 April 2023

Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection with parent template. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Do we really need to go higher? Courcelles (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Ymblanter thought in 2016 that we did. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:49, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Vandalism started right back up after unprotection. (Roundish t) 22:23, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Indef, invoking GENSEX. Courcelles (talk) 22:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP Vandalism 2604:3D09:6A84:7700:255F:8FC6:7AF3:B80C (talk) 23:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Kinu t/c 23:07, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Match protection level with parent template. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of promotional content, non-neutral POV content, and removal of reliably-sourced sexual assault allegation section Rift (talk) 02:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Nath1991 (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Spam and misinformation about the person's nationality without any credible sources. Afshinafs (talk) 14:13, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Apparent ongoing edit war. Agentdoge (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FMSky (talk) 21:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Pending changes seems fine. Bbb23 (talk) 21:35, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Increased protection 209.27.55.193 (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 22:14, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 22:10, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Courcelles (talk) 22:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Pbrks (t • c) 00:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary full-protection - Content dispute. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:50, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 00:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated attempts by hopping IPs to change away from established consensus. Gugrak (talk) 14:56, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive editing and unsourced or poorly sourced sites. Edwordo13 (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One or two vandal edits seem to be being made daily, so I don't think PC is sufficient. An admin protected the page for a week a year ago, and the vandals have just come right back. Either indefinite or for an extended period (1-12 months maybe) should do the trick. interstatefive  23:53, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The frequency of vandalism is inconsistent: there are small spurts, followed by days of silence (in March and April, there have been such periods of over a week). Pending-changes is well-equipped enough to deal with this, in my opinion. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – I request the the article for China is moved to extended indefinitely due to the recent turmoil of US/Chinese relationships, as well as the war in Ukraine. BillClinternet (talk) 01:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GPL93 (talk) 01:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:1702:1110:A450:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs). Sdrqaz (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Subject of the BLP seems to deny owning a mine. Reliable sources say he does. IP accounts keep removing content despite content being well sourced. CT55555(talk) 03:01, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Severe BLP (well, BDP) violations. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Yes, please!! Pretty egregious vandalism, probably the most disgusting edit summaries I've ever seen (if we could also get those scrubbed, that would be fantastic) That Coptic Guy (let's talk?) (contribs) 04:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
PLEASE. Marleeashton (talk) 04:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Already done by administrator Oshwah. and Tamzin Euryalus (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Ongoing IP vandalism WWGB (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Oshwah.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some IPs are making the same disruptive edit though they have been reverted by several editors. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:55, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A02:A451:8BC3:1:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Also BosniakDefender001 blocked indef as an SPA. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated efforts by random IPs and user Strawberrymochix59 to change and remove already sourced information in the past few days. Nyeeye (talk) 23:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Strawberrymochix59 (talk · contribs). for 24 hours for 3RR violation. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Temporary semi due to being one of the most viewed articles currently, and may be subject to vandalism. BillClinternet (talk) 02:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Move protection: I request move permission to admins only. As the official name is changed and now IP's will come to change its name. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 03:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. Thanks for the request but this is a single image change and revert which is insufficient for page protection. The content dispute over which image to use in infobox can be resolved in talkpage discussion. -- Euryalus (talk) 05:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Addition of unsourced and unverifiable content by new users. DDMS123 (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent high levels of vandalism, with the majority of edits going back over a year being vandalism or removal of vandalism. The page has received temporary protection in the past, but high levels of vandalism returned within weeks of page protection being removed. Ornithopsis (talk) 00:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Theoneandonlyleb (talk · contribs) blocked by Bishonen. Before 17 April, the last disruption was weeks before that. Sdrqaz (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
What is the threshold for considering vandalism levels high enough to justify some kind of protection? Nearly half (~40%) of all edits to the page over the last two months have been nonconstructive, with most of the other half being reverting those nonconstructive edits. On average, the page is vandalized several times a month, and this pattern has not changed since the first time I requested page protection nearly a year ago. It might not be vandalized daily, but it's vandalized often enough to overwhelm the page history with junk. Ornithopsis (talk) 03:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Good question. That might have been had it been more than one editor, Blocking the one should fix the problem w/o potentially inconveniencing literally millions of Wikipedia users, -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I took the liberty of setting pending-changes protection. The disruption isn't heavy enough to warrant semi-protection, but pending-changes seems just right to handle this situation. If any admin disagrees, feel free to lift the protection without asking :). Lectonar (talk) 09:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In the news this week, the Bercon Beacons park authority is henceforth only using its Welsh Name. As we saw with Snowdonia, there are a spate of IP editors wanting to change the page to the Welsh name, despite the fact that this is not the WP:COMMONNAME and despite ongoing talk discussion. Requesting 1 week semi protection until the initial spate generated by the publicity wears off. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 09:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple editors are trying to add information based on whatever little they got online or on basis of somebody feeding that information. Some of the matters mentioned in newspapers are subjudice and it is against law to influence public opinion and make it a media trial. The Wikipedia link with this material is getting circulated on WhatsApp. 117.236.106.195 (talk) 06:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined The repeated edit warring to remove what appears to be properly-sourced content confirms that protection is necessary. Kinu t/c 06:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Rampant sockpuppetry. Capitals00 (talk) 01:48, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Second last IP that edit warred here is already blocked for socking.[23] Report has been filed for the last IP sock which belongs to an LTA per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nangparbat. Capitals00 (talk) 02:00, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined Disruption not that heavy; let's deal with this via blocking the socks. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Same IP editor keeps editing subject's DOB with no source after it gets removed. Kcj5062 (talk) 03:35, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent vandalism to Nkrumah's titles. Despite the fact that Kwame Nkrumah was the President of Ghana, vandals keep making edits to change his honorifics to colonial-era titles, like "the Right Honorable" and "Privy Council". Nkrumah was the Head of State of Ghana, and was appropriately referred to as "Your Excellency". The vandalism is persistent and the page needs protection. 198.167.196.157 (talk) 08:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. CastJared (talk) 08:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. before I got there. Maybe that will stop it.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The article is indefinitely semi-protected, which means that having the article pending protected makes implicitly no sense. Reset pending changes?197.26.153.57 (talk) 09:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected PC removed. Courcelles (talk) 12:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... (Since the bot isn't going to like any templates we use here.) Courcelles (talk) 12:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: An offensive edit-war is taking place that is entirely inappropriate. For example, the term "enslaved people" was reverted by a user, RL0919, to "slaves". Conventionally, the former term is the preferred way to refer to enslaved people. An article of such historical importance like that of Harriet Tubman's deserves a sophisticated approach, not an ignorant one. The article should be protected at a higher level, so users like RL0919 cannot simply revert improvements without accountability. Private Person (talk) 05:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: All edit warring is offensive -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Aside from other issues with your request, your opponent has higher seniority than you, so any level of protection short of "full" would favor them. Favonian (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Personal attacks by IP. Semsûrî (talk) 07:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IPs getting reverted constantly (mainly for removing the AfD template). As the article is at AfD, please use the lowest level of protection, to enable accounts to improve the article. Fram (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A bit of a hack use of PC, but worth a shot. Courcelles (talk) 12:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: This page has a vast number of monthly views and may benefit from semi-protection to combat vandalism. Jaben1777 (talk) 14:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected Courcelles (talk) 14:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP and new user removal of sourced content occurring since late February in spurts has resumed today. --Local hero talk 14:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: "All men are brothers, like the seas throughout the world; So why do winds and waves clash so fiercely everywhere?" --Hirohito-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Page does not get too many edits (~25 in the previous year), but all of them except one by Citation bot have needed reverting; this is the kind of situation in which PC would work well. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 15:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rise in vandalism, only going to increase as club likely to be relegated. Red Jay (talk) 14:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:02, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Over 5,000 transclusions, highly visible. Recent unintentional breakage by edit-confirmed editor. Requesting Template Editor protection. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:38, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Template protected —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
I don't think we usually protect this template despite its high transclusion count. This locks a lot of experienced editors out of editing it. There is a discussion about unprotecting it at Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion#TE Protection. –Novem Linguae (talk) 18:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Users who used to commit vandalism on WP, including this page, are no longer active for about 5 years. Furthermore, most edits which were tagged as "Reverted" on windows 11 version history, which is not protected BTW, were not necessarily vandalism, especially by anonymous users.

Finally, ever since the page was split into individual pages (windows 10 (original release)windows 10, version 21H1) there were little to no vandalism being committed on those pages. Thus, the need to have this page indefinitely protected is no longer convincing and justifiable nowadays per my typed comments. 197.26.153.57 (talk) 06:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

@Fvasconcellos: any thougths on that? Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Unprotected; seems reasonable enough. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 18:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
What about the redirect Windows 10 version history (2015–2016)? Should it be deleted or have its protection settings removed as well?197.26.153.57 (talk)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal is back to falsifying the 2019 results. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 16:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. This park's name is allegedly going to go by its Welsh name, which would require a future article move. Not a huge deal, but there has been some edit warring for a few days over this name change, along with a still-active talk page discussion over it. Requesting protection for maybe a few weeks? That Coptic Guy (let's talk?) (contribs) 16:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Consider starting a formal move discussion, otherwise these kind of discussions tend to drag on forever and never actually resolve. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. CT55555(talk) 16:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Scottywong. The page is pending changes protected for 1 year. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection. The cause is pesistent disruptive editing of the lead over the course of past 24 hours; information not present in the article and not supported by the sources cited is added. The matter has been addressed on the talk page already. All of the edits have been made by a single IP, so the problem is unlikely to be long term. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 15:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Fandom IP removing gay claims. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Hadal (talk) 18:41, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users changing "public broadcaster" to "state media" repeatedly (e.g. [24]), as well as other flagrantly POV vandalism. The recent incident with Twitter has dogwhistled the trolls, but this sort of vandalism has been going on for a while now. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Hadal (talk) 18:37, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 20:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism from many different IP while the article is featured in Depths of Wikipedia today. colt_browning (talk) 18:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 20:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Semi-frequent anti-LGBT edits, but not frequent enough to justify semi-protection. InvalidOStalk 19:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Ongoing edit War over largest city involving "multiple" editors. Let's lock this up for a day or 2 get all to talk page. Moxy- 20:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:31, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on the page. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 15:56, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Coordinated vandalism and repeated introduction of unsourced nonsense from multiple IPs in Greece. Novemberjazz 18:30, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I know that thas site is protected because it is a very much used module. Can you see if you can unprotect it. I know only administrators can edit it. 88.89.228.126 (talk) 13:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

19 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Addition of unsourced and unverified information by IP users and new users. Also some IP and new users make unexplained changes and deletions to the article. I would recommend having the protection last until after the coronation. DDMS123 (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:19, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Childish vandalism. $chnauzer 22:54, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and being article of high importance. Anand 02:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:29, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mass amount of vandals. Please finally bring an end to these IP users vandalizing this page. Thanks, BillClinternet (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Already blocked IP seems to pretty much be the only disruptive account this month, certainly for the last few weeks. El_C 03:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article being vandalised frequently. 1keyhole (talk) 05:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. No temporary for WP:GENSEX subjects. El_C 06:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism which is expected to continue. There should be a temporary 3 to 6 months of protection. Satdeep Gill (talkcontribs 05:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 07:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The second the protection was removed, IPs started doing their schtick again and vandalizing the page. I think we might need much MUCH longer protection. Zingo156 (talk) 06:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: BLP violations/edit war, could also fall under WP:GS/RUSUKR. Discussion open here, no uninvolved editors in discussion so extra eyes would also be appreciated. Tollens (talk) 06:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. Logged GS action. El_C 07:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Needs Protection against vandalism and edit warring. 1keyhole (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

XCP would do nothing to kerb the edit-warring as some of the parties are extended-confirmed. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Already protected. Not quite at the point where full protection becomes necessary. Favonian (talk) 08:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The community imosed general sanctions for the topics related to Russian-Ukrainian war, and we already have disruptive editing by IPs. Ymblanter (talk) 10:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 10:24, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: There is no vandalism as reported, simply unflattering legitimate information about a company revealed to be data farming for the NSA, illegally spying on American Citizens, and now has attempted to move free mail accounts behind a paywall, charging decades old free email users to access their emails without consent. 2600:6C46:4000:FCA1:DCB:BA6C:784C:A56C (talk) 22:51, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

(1) That protection was ten years ago. (2) Your argument isn't a good one and is likely to be counterproductive. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 06:26, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotectedFavonian (talk) 08:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. (Roundish t) 12:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP's bent on blanket removing sourced content. The usual stuff. -. LouisAragon (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Same IP being disruptive. Lectonar (talk) 13:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Shortly after last semi-prot expired, IP hopping has started back up. Please see page history and protection log. Silikonz💬 15:27, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Several incidents of vandalism over the last 24 hours resulting from a incident which has been mentioned in the article and referenced.

Request Semi-PP for 7-days until the incident moves out of the news cycle. Nath1991 (talk) 12:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Per request. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Multiple times has been deleted/blanked/redirected by unregistered users with little or no valid reason given SurferSquall (talk) 14:56, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: not seeing that. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:02, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. CastJared (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – He just passed away with confirmation from the police and supported by Yonhap News sourcing that's already included in the article. However, multiple IPs (read fans) unable to accept reality and kept disruptive editing. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 17:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism and edit wars Sargon Gallu (talk) 19:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive IP on war path, labeling a countries woman as a “archaic slave dancer”, and insisting on adding a 40 year old flag as representative of a countries culture (see Flag of Iran). -. LouisAragon (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Only disruptive editing comes from LouisAragon's side, who claims a national flag represents the "authoritarian regime" which is an extreme POV. All other country templates have national flags so I simply restored old stable version. And yes, virtually all dancers from Qajar court were slaves, often foreign, as well as sexual workers. To illustrate a national culture with a prostitute is truly an insult to our country. 5.115.147.120 (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
  • "Only disruptive editing comes from LouisAragon's side"
That's the good thing about Wikipedia, you can't delete any diff ;-) It was you who (re)added that flag as image,[25] reverting an edit that had been in place for six months.[26]
  • "who claims a national flag represents the "authoritarian regime" which is an extreme POV"
Read Human rights in the Islamic Republic of Iran, Media freedom in Iran, the ongoing Mahsa Amini protests, Flag of Iran, and the dozen of protests that have took place since 1979, all of which have their own article: [27]
  • "So I simply restored old stable version"
Nope. What you did was initiating an edit war and ignoring WP:WAR and WP:BRD.
  • "And yes, virtually all dancers from Qajar court were slaves, often foreign, as well as sexual workers. To illustrate a national culture with a prostitute is truly an insult to our country"
The title and description at Commons reads "Qajar princess paiting".[28] Not a single word on the page about "slave" or "prostitute". Nice misogynic comment tho, claiming a woman to be a slave and prostitute without any sort evidence. Even if its about a historical figure (or imaginary figure, doesn't matter), such evidence only adds to the obvious fact that you are WP:NOTHERE to build this encyclopedia. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:35, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IP accounts, including several instances in the last few weeks, on a page that has been put under temporary semi protection three times. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 20:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Over past week, vandalized 9 times by 3 IPs and now a newly registered account. signed, Willondon (talk) 20:12, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:14, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jetstreamer Talk 11:53, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined I don't see full protection justified at this point. Bbb23 (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been vandalized and need to be protected from new and unregistered users. Rachel165 (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High Level of unconfirmed gossip being posted. Itisi5 (talk) 16:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Anonymous user is waging edit warring against established Billboard charts guidelines (replacing established charts with lesser component charts). Multiple users have stepped in to salvage the page from reverts, but the user immediately ignores explanations and makes the changes again anyways. At least one other editor has already suggested adding protections to the page in response to this individual waging their daily editing war. Since they are editing anonymously I would suggest protecting the page for established editors for a period of time please. Happyomen (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. InfiniteNexus (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Harassment from an IP user. StigmaOfTruth (talk) 18:05, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This article seems to be a frequent target of petty vandalism. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 18:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long term disruptive redirect overwriting with duplicate content from target. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:09, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Increasing Vandalisms and disruptions on ITN (In the news) nominee. [29][30][31][32][33][34] Ecrusized (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Ongoing Conflict, adding a lot that hasn't been confirmed etc. Uwdwadafsainainawinfi (talk) 18:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 22:00, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: It’s says Persian speaker but in fact he was a Persian Sijistani (talk) 17:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Edit-warring over this specific point is the reason why this page is extended-confirmed protected. Take it to Talk:Abu Dawud al-Sijistani. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected per above. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

20 April 2023

Reason: Disruptive IP's and a new account doing whitewashing of pro-confederacy edits violating NPOV. Such users are subject of an SPI investigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Abecedare.RegentsPark (comment) 23:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Home Lander (talk) 22:44, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:47, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The Happy Tree Friends fanatic is at it again. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is unjustified as the articles contains accusations on one of the rightest companions of holy prophet , and it is done to just creat hatred among muslims ummah and to justify their hatred towards the noble personality, it is man made story and hurt the sentiment of a common man....... . Imuser20055 (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:02, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – We are averaging 5 to 10 reverts a day for the past week. Multiple new editors edit waring over multiple points. Let's lock this up for a few days..... let's make the point that this is not acceptable and edit warning during discussion is not productive. Moxy- 01:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page is giving the public misinformation about a medicine that's been effective for thousands of years. The page calls it "quackery" which is completely false and extremely misleading. It is a disgrace that you would allow a page like this on a site claiming to give unbiased information. 2600:1702:3860:15C0:8115:6608:1D15:DADA (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Feel free to take your concerns to the article's talk page, and review the "Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience" section of that page. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:30, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 22:36, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Mass additions of entire galleries of non-existent files with copypasted nonsensical edit summary by IP-hopping editor(s) who either can't or won't listen to warnings. Previously has done the same thing at TV5 (Philippine TV network) and Net 25, as well as their own talk pages. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 01:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – All the recent edits by IPv6 editors (2600:) are vandalism. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 02:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Requesting long-term semi-protection: there seems to be an issue with a certain IP editor making disruptive edits bit-by-bit, which has been going on for at least three months now. Disruptive edits came from various IPv4 and IPv6 addresses over those last few months. — AP 499D25 (talk) 02:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 03:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GoodnightmushTalk 01:19, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wrong and unsourced info being added to article by various IPs. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:59, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 05:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by an autoconfirmed user to introduce controversial material for which there is no consensus. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 05:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. Logged AE action. El_C 06:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. WCMemail 06:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Mostly disruptive edits by IPs ever since the article was automatically unlocked back in late February. Nythar (💬-🍀) 06:01, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edit was April 8, so a bit Stale at this point. El_C 06:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: please allow me to clean the article its worth doing rather deleting. i can see the impact how many people are visiting this page after it was published. it will be a great addition to this related domain scope of topic. Please remove the protection as well otherwise how will i edit :) Tuqwy19 (talk) 06:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined The page isn't protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I wrote the biography on this topic in draft but could not submit it due to protection. please allow me to submit Tuqwy19 (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined The draft isn't protected; once it has been accepted, protection in article space can be lifted. Lectonar (talk) 06:26, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. El_C 07:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Highly persistent block evasion/LTAing. Magitroopa (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: it isn't an important, sensitive, and/or susceptible to vandalism Starkling5 (talk) 15:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Probably not susceptible to vandalism cause it's protected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Having said that, it's been protected since 2010, so I'd be willing to try. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
I for one would expect disruption to slowly pick up after lifting the protection, so would probably go for trying pending-changes protection at first, and add the article to my watchlist to evaluate. Lectonar (talk) 06:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected Let's give it a try. Courcelles (talk) 12:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: hello, I don 't have an updated Wikipedia article about Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Writes that this article is expanded and protected . What should I do? How to remove the protection ? Kiriuxa2002 (talk) 06:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Protected in accordance with Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: hello , please meet me halfway and remove the protection from changes in the article about the invasion of Ukraine . Kiriuxa2002 (talk) 10:50, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Protected in accordance with Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War. Favonian (talk) 11:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Since a lot of fake penalty and goal contribution stats, memes and related conspiracy theories are circulating on the internet regarding e.g. how many of Messi’s goals or goal contributions were penalty goals during the 2021 Copa America and the 2022 FIFA World Cup, I suggest adding e.g. something like this (to make it easy for anyone who visits Messi’s wikipedia page to quickly see at least some basic facts about Messi’s performances during the two tournaments in question):

With his country, he won the 2021 Copa América, where he scored four goals (one penalty) and five assists, finishing as the tournament’s top scorer while also receiving the Best Player Award for his performances, and the 2022 FIFA World Cup, where he scored seven goals (four penalties) and made three assists and received the FIFA World Cup Golden Ball for best player of the tournament (becoming the only player in history to win the FIFA World Cup Golden Ball twice). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.234.97.237 (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

The specific goal counts are too much detail to put in prose. Other than that, the rest of this seems fairly reasonable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 16:15, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
If the context given by the IP above is correct (which I have no reason to assume it's not, but I don't follow association football), why does this violate point #3 there? It's not particularly excessive (this is one paragraph), and it's not impossible to give context behind why it's included if needed. Again, I'm not actually aware if this is a major enough issue where adding this would significantly aid readers, but I don't think it's necessarily too much to put in prose. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done – No one has been willing to make the requested change. More importantly, as of 19:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC), Talk:Lionel Messi is no longer protected and further discussion may take place there. Favonian (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive IP socking here on a page under WP:CASTE sanctions; see the SPI Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala of the master promoting Koli POVPUSH. Gotitbro (talk) 13:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Wouldn't you guess it, the sock IP is now threatening to murder me: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP sock threatening to rape and murder. Gotitbro (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from disruptive IP edit warrior. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 14:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:53, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Loafiewa (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 15:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – High traffic of disruptive editing from multiple IPs and newly registered due to the recent passing of Moonbin. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 15:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP disruption in April. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:43, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: Draft article at AC ready for acceptance, but needs creation protection removed first. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 07:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected. Didn't look too hard, but the draft appears to be ok. Dennis Brown - 18:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: There isn't currently a page for the Philadelphia Surge, as one of the founding members of the team, I would like to create our Wiki page. Etsoiles8 (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined@Etsoiles8: The page is not protected, but I strongly recommend that you create a draft through the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process. Before doing you so, you should acquaint yourself with Wikipedia's policy regarding conflict of interest. Favonian (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Needs change of city name Djsourabh.bwd (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Your request at the article talk page (the correct venue) was recently rejected. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Despite its success in imitating human language, ChatGPT has faced significant criticism for its dangers and ethical concerns.[1][2][3] On March 31, Italian data regulator temporarily banned ChatGPT for leaking user data that contained credit card information and launched an investigation to the security breach.[4]
Please add this text to the lead section of the article. 95.12.127.137 (talk) 18:21, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

"On March 31" should be "On March 31, 2023," and you want to name the specific regulatory agency rather than a generic "Italian data regulator." —Jéské Couriano (No further replies will be forthcoming.) 20:41, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
The second sentence should just start as "On March 31, 2023, an Italian data regulator temporarily banned ChatGPT", or replace "an Italian data regulator" with the specific one. (The source is paywalled, but I think it's "Italian Garante"? So it would be "On March 31, 2023, Italian Garante temporarily banned ChatGPT", but I have no idea if anyone would know what that means and there's no article on it to link to.) Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:51, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
This is already mentioned on ChatGPT#Reception. And since the talk page isn't protected, this request should go there instead. Edit: talk page is protected, the template was just missing. The RedBurn (ϕ) 08:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
It is not mentioned in the lead. Per WP:LEAD All but the shortest articles should start with introductory text (the "lead"), which establishes significance, includes mention of significant criticism or controversies, and make readers want to learn more. 95.12.127.137 (talk) 08:48, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done – After a couple of weeks, no one has been willing to expand the current coverage of the Italian situation. Favonian (talk) 17:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Remove the claim that "[Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA] is the first video game series to utilize audio created in the Vocaloid software." on the top section of the article.

The top section contains a factual error: regarding Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA, there's a claim that "It is the first video game series to utilize audio created in the Vocaloid software." The first series is actually Katamari Damacy:
The ending song of Korogashi Puzzle Katamari Damacy features the voice of Hatsune Miku, it's even explicitly explained in the article of that Katamari Damacy game.
Korogashi Puzzle Katamari Damacy was released on March 25, 2009; while Hatsune Miku: Project DIVA was released on July 2, 2009.

I do realize it's an extreme nitpick, but still it's something factually wrong on an encyclopedia. I wanted to change the article myself, but it's semi-protected. Santi531 (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Are there references for these dates? -- Euryalus (talk) 04:18, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done – No one has been willing to make the requested change, and the OP (who has only made this single edit) has not provided references. Favonian (talk) 17:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

21 April 2023

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. —⁠ScottyWong⁠— 19:09, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. CastJared (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2a02:85f:f000::/40 (talk · contribs). For 6 months. Favonian (talk) 20:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated introduction of nonsensical material in infobox. nableezy - 22:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 22:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal from different users and IPs of WP:SPOILER content. Wikipedialuva (talk) 23:07, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semiprotection: Article seems to be a magnet for trolling, vandalism and other low quality edits by IPs. Request permanent semi-protection (auto confirmed users only), like the AC/DC article. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 23:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 23:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC) 23:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. and logged at AELOG/2023 Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Article has been moved from April 19 to April 19-20 and back several times. United States Man (talk) 02:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Move protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Pecos Hank says (probably): too many moves! El_C 04:49, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: We are updating Roberts page to reflect a new direction in our business. Protection prohibits our making these changes. Please remove to allow Robert to edit his info. Wiki Mod Level 99 (talk) 01:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done Wikipedia isn't a PR platform. Users can make edit requests on the article talk page. Please also read WP:COI and WP:BLOCKEVASION. OhNoitsJamie Talk 01:58, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Edit and revision war between parties involved in a dispute. 2601:801:200:824:64CD:AB3F:A543:CA1E (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined Article has been nominated for deletion; let's let that process work out. Daniel Case (talk) 03:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Sock-Puppetry; User:Lithuaniaball2 keeps on vandalizing it. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 22:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Bahooka (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Unprotect Suhaib Mahdi (talk) 01:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Drive-by IP editors will not leave this page alone since the previous PPs were terminated. Please review the edit history. Please consider blocking until May 31, at which time the attraction will close and IPs can have it. JlACEer (talk) 03:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Thinking IPs will stop vandalising the page the moment the attraction is mothballed is, sadly, wishful thinking. The vandalism risk will likely remain elevated for a while after. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 03:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 14 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Agreed with above, closure day would be a bad time to unprotect the article. Courcelles (talk) 12:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Harushiga (talk) 06:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This article was protected a while back when Bachmann was running for president. Not only was that a long time ago, but she has also long since retired from politics, making it far less likely that this article will receive as much vandalism as it did pre-protection, unless there is something else I am not aware of. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Put it on my watchlist too, and after 3 months protection will be gone if there's no great disruption. Lectonar (talk) 06:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks! Have a good day, 47.227.95.73 (talk) 10:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jfect22 (talk) 00:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 10:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Peresistent Vandalism and NPOV problems with this article 1keyhole (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1.8 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalized by 4 different IP addresses in the last few days. –Novem Linguae (talk) 05:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected Courcelles (talk) 13:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent posting of unverified libelous claims (in fact, I see no evidence even referring to anything near these claims) by IP editor hopping around different addresses. Wes sideman (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Vandals disruptively editing my talk page. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 13:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

additionally sock disruption -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 13:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA Sheep (talkhe/him) 13:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected. Courcelles (talk) 13:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA Sheep (talkhe/him) 13:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected. Courcelles (talk) 13:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Excessive socking from LTA. SHB2000 (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Mostly from Special:Contributions/2603:9001:7500:3242::/64. BilCat (talk) 05:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Courcelles (talk) 13:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Most recent edits are vandalism, labeling the subject with the non-neutral term dictator, or reverts of other edits. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP/new user disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lithuaniaball2- Lithuania2 socks are still disrupting the article. Also, I filed a RFPP earlier but Daniel Case erroneously blocked Bahooka for edit warring when Bahooka was fighting vandalism from Lithuaniaball2 socks. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 10:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism by ip accounts, removal of well sourced content. Page protection of indefinite time is required to combat it. RamaKrishnaHare (talk) 11:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I am not sure yet that indef protection is necessary, but six months is longer than any previous such protection. We'll see how it goes. I have also added a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 18:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism over the course of several years. The same edit made. Simione001 (talk) 14:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Autoconfirmed user edit warring with misleading summaries to introduce material contrary to our BLP policies. Same user also edit warred at Insurgency in Jammu and Kashmir due to which the page had to be ECP protected. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. And logged as such. Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This article is receiving high amounts of traffic and prone to hit and run IP edits. Solblaze (talk) 06:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, this article comes under CTOPS, but it really isn't getting more disruption than the editors seem to be able to handle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism from Special:Contributions/185.115.5.40 and Special:Contributions/85.117.56.69

UserXpetVarpet (talk) 07:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent block evasion by IP socks of User:Chicca70. MrOllie (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

22 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Again, anons doing partial live updates. Unsourced edits. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
5 edits in less than 12 hours. Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:00, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Hi. I'd like to ask you for help with Iron Maiden band WIKI page to be protected from frequent acts of vandalism. Some unregistered persons (so called IPers) use to delete data or write the nonsenses just for fun. There's a necessity to apply some semi - protection proper tool (Semi - Protected Silverlock) to avoid the highly uncomfortable situations like that. Thx a lot! ~~ RALFFPL (talk) 18:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC) RALFFPL (talk) 19:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Insufficient vandalism either on the page you asked for, or the page it redirects to. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP and new user vandalism. Kleopatra I Syra (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv 23:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: In the news regarding possibly being suspended by the NFL. There have been several unsourced changes since the news broke. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long term semi protection was recently semi protected due to edit warring by anon IPs, this can continued since the protection was lifted. LibStar (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP address 92.9.7.129 is still trying to vandalize the page, which I'm assuming is the same blocked person who had duplicate accounts and was blocked a few days ago (TheCurrencyGuy and I can't remember the other user name they used), though I might be wrong, but I'm assuming it is the same person. Please protect this page from any more vandalism, preferably long term. Thanks. MatthewS. (talk) 18:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. LTA. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 18:24, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Spicy. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Squeakachu (talk) 18:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spate of cross-IP vandalism. czar 20:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DatGuyTalkContribs 01:28, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 01:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DMacks (talk) 03:50, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent activity adding death information. A "verified" twitter account has said he has died, but so far no reliable sources support this. Grayfell (talk) 01:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 02:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Originally move protected back in 2010 because it was a featured article. It's no longer a featured article (and hasn't been since 2015) and otherwise no history of move warring. There's currently an uncontested (at the time this request was submitted) move request over at WP:RM/TR that cannot be acted upon due to this obsolete move protection, fwiw. SkyWarrior 14:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected ~Anachronist (talk) 03:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. BattleshipMan (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Sudden spike in schoolkids goofing off, and also promotional/advocacy for the school itself that has recently announced it is closing. Probably needs "something" through the end of June, and "semi for now"; not sure if a few days' SEMI and few months' PC, or just few months' SEMI (given the news, I don't expect the situation to change until then). DMacks (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long-term abuse/Mangoeater1000. 87.240.244.139 (talk) 03:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:00, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and sockpuppetry by various new users and IPs. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing coming from various IPs, over last day or so. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:57, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of unsourced content regarding a supposed role in a film called "Fat Guy's Paradise" - which appears to be a hoax. Dorsetonian (talk) 05:49, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – addition of unverified content repeatedly. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism ,His Majesty's page was on semi-protection until yesterday and there is already users trying to erase some informations from his Wikipediapage. 196.75.82.215 (talk) 07:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Partofthemachine (talk) 03:26, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. El_C 09:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Semi Protection: High level of IP vandalism The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 13:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs keep changing the word "and" to "plus" in the first sentence in an attempt to insert an inside joke/reference related to the subject's work and don't seem to be persuaded to stop by the existing hidden note. This has been an issue for a long time, as these edits constitute almost every change made to this page in recent years. Given the persistence of the issue, I would opt for a rather long protection time, but that's obviously not my decision to make. Felida97 (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: One contributor's dissatisfaction with Wikipedia:Vector 2022 led to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Powelliphantapatrickensis2.jpg, and when that failed, constant intermittent vandalism of Powelliphanta patrickensis has been their recourse (since the file's Commons page was previously protected). — Fourthords | =Λ= | 10:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator DanCherek. for six months. Daniel Case (talk) 20:03, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Unsourced death. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 10:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done, as the death appears to have been confirmed now. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated addition of deliberate factual errors (same edit) by three different IP editors in less than a week. Hopefully a few days of semi-protection will see them get bored and go back to their Top Trumps cards. 10mmsocket (talk) 11:36, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption from a certain group of socks. Nythar (💬-🍀) 19:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 20:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Full protection: Match protection level with Template:Class mask. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP users keep messing around. ReaganHoang10 (talk) 19:22, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As soon as the semi-protection automatically expired on April 12, a wave of vandalism and disruptive editing from IPs and new users began. I therefore believe this article should be semi-protected indefinitely, or at least for a long time. Guycn2 (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 22:08, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

23 April 2023

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism conducted by one specific user FlameCelestial since last week making virturally identical edits, which were against NPOV policy and the existing consensus, and no relevant reason for the change were given. Request for extending page protection or increasing the level of protection. List of IP revision history:
1.https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sun_Moon_Lake&diff=prev&oldid=1151184447
2.https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sun_Moon_Lake&diff=prev&oldid=1150650596
3.https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Sun_Moon_Lake&diff=prev&oldid=1149669970
LVTW2 (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done. User already reported at WP:ANEW. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 15:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
I have also declined the report at ANEW since the reported user's reverts are spread out over several days and thus do not violate 3RR. Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. People are understandable upset that teenager a horrorific death over course of days. there has been other incidents of controversy such facial paralysis 1keyhole (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just two edits today. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Fearing vandalism, I suggest to make it 30/500 & WP:ARBEE under the WP:GS/RUSUKR. Z (military symbol) was protected under similar circumstances —174.89.100.123 (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Daniel Case (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Spicy. Favonian (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IPs started again immediately after the last protection expired. Subject recently died hence was previously protected due to the same reason. Paper9oll (🔔📝) 04:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Indefinite semi-protection. Persistent vandalism, BLP vios and long-term block evasion. 185.68.209.26 (talk) 06:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Asking for page protection due to disruptive editing. Sricsi (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an issue regarding harassment of a voice actor who appeared in the video game Resident Evil 4. Two IP users (one of which at least used two different addresses) and a brand new registered account have failed to understand what they are trying to do is incorrect and inappropriate. See talk page for a lengthy discussion. Despite the long talks, they do not understand (WP:DIDNTHEARTHAT pretty much). A temporary edit protection might make it clear their attitude here is not right. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 13:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ferret. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 14:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive editing from multiple accounts, including registered accounts and IP addresses, which could very likely all be the same person. JeffSpaceman (talk) 14:03, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PhilKnight (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 2024 Indonesian presidential elections, he's the primary candidate. Gtgamer79 (talk) 07:21, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. CastJared (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done. Edit war stopped and users warned. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. CastJared (talk) 09:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done. Discussion has moved on to WP:ANEW and edit war seemingly stopped. Will keep an eye on. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Keeps being re-created by COI user, then deleted... could do with salting. - RichT|C|E-Mail 12:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 12:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent additions of blockchain/citespam from revolving IP editors. MrOllie (talk) 15:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 22:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.RegentsPark (comment) 16:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: excessive vandalism by cross-wiki long-term abuse Sidowpknbkhihj (ja:LTA:HEATHROW). Please semi-protect my user talk page. 郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 01:55, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.RegentsPark (comment) 16:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jay Coop · Talk · Contributions 16:45, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Asking for page protection due to disruptive editing by IP users. The page was already protected in the past, but the situation is the same. Sricsi (talk) 13:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Bbb23 (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated speculation and unsourced additions regarding an unconfirmed reopening. Has been going on for months. J991 14:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry by IP hopper. Editorkamran (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. Favonian (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: An ultra-nationalist political party in Israel is covered under WP:ARBPIA ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 16:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. WP:ARBECR. El_C 17:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Good-faith but persistent & disruptive editing from IP editor - ReneeWrites (talk) 16:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:09, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism conducted by one specific user (FlameCelestial) started from last week making virturally identical edits, which were against NPOV policy and the existing consensus, and no relevant reason for the changes were given with frequent attempts to implant personal political ideology into a pure geographical topic. Request for extending page protection or increasing the level of protection. List of IP revision history:

LVTW2 (talk) 16:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring – User LVTW2 has consistently reverted edits on this page without providing any explanations. Terminologies employed in LVTW2's revision suspected to push a political agenda as it differs from the official name Taiwan (as a political entity) is referred under, that is "Republic of China".

Request for extending page protection or increasing the level of protection. FlameCelestial (talk) 16:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

The lonstanding version did imput "Taiwan" within locator per WP:COMMON NAME, User:FlameCelestial has been attempting to alter the content in favour of his political ideology when the topic is pure geographical-related, unconstructive edits initiated from him despite the user falsely accusation towards me as the one producing the controversy. LVTW2 (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Link provided (WP:COMMON NAME) does not state justifications to add the suffix "(Taiwan)" behind "Republic of China". User:LVTW2 has conflated a political entity with a geographical location, which one cannot fully discount that there's an external vendetta to it. FlameCelestial (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism – Repetitive vandalism and unconstructive edits conducted by one specific user (FlameCelestial) within a week making virturally identical edits, which were against NPOV policy and the existing consensus, and no relevant reason for the changes were given, with frequent attempts to implant personal political ideology into a pure geographical topic. Request for extending page protection or increasing the level of protection. List of IP revision history:

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. @LVTW2 and FlameCelestial: stop using this page to argue over each other. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:08, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks Isabelle Belato and completely agree that this page is not the correct place to settle any disagreements. FlameCelestial (talk) 17:13, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced content by IP editor(s). Austronesier (talk) 17:06, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 17:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from someone using multiple ranges including 2600:1005:B080:0:0:0:0:0/44 (currently blocked), 2600:1005:B010:0:0:0:0:0/44, and 2600:1005:B210:0:0:0:0:0/44. With all the ranges they are using, seems unlikely to stop anytime soon. Magitroopa (talk) 22:19, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Has also been vandalizing at SpongeBob SquarePants (season 11) recently using another range: 2600:1005:B060:0:0:0:0:0/44. Based on the blocks they currently have here and here, it appears to be an LTA/block evasion/sockpuppetry. Magitroopa (talk) 22:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Vandalism and unsourced edits continue briefly after protection expiry, chronic issue. TylerBurden (talk) 15:07, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The article is a constant target of editors who wish to change "mytholgy" to "history'" with a large fraction of the article history being taken up by this change and its reversion. A semi-protection or, at least, a pending change protection would help keep the disruption somewhat in check and and help the article editors and readers. I would recommend against a time-limited protection, since the cause of this disruption is not going to go away in a few months or years. Pinging @Joshua Jonathan, Chronikhiles, and DaxServer: (all of whom have reverted the change recently), in case they wish to add anything to this request. Abecedare (talk) 19:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Abecedare, as long-term semi-protection has not been tried on that article before, I have set it to a year for now. I see that the disruption has a longer history than that, but before I indefinitely semi-protect, I'd like to have tried this before. Please let me know (or re-request) if this resumes afterwards. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks ToBeFree! Even the 1-year semi helps a lot. Can always post another request if/when the disruption resumes sometime next year. Cheers. Abecedare (talk) 20:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
🙂 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

24 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent additions violating BLP and MOS:ROLEBIO are making it into the article despite pending changes having been applied. Editors continue to refuse to engage on the talk page and the one who has agrees that MOS:ROLEBIO should be followed. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  06:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – For some reason, new accounts and IPs are repeatedly vandalising this page, introducing ridiculously large population figures. RolandR (talk) 19:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 22:56, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ) 19:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 22:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 23:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite full protection: It was discovered on the following section,Wikipedia_talk:Deceased_Wikipedians#BlazerKnight, plus earlier edits years ago on the talk page plus one on the actual user page that this user is deceased and therefore I think the standard procedure is to fully protect the user page to preserve in their memory. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected indefinitely. BusterD (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:25, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BusterD (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs persistently reordering cast members and changing role descriptions. It has turned into a slow edit war.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 03:36, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Note that this page was previously protected beginning on April 1 for ten days due to this same pattern disruptive editing on the cast listing. This film is not due to be released until January 2024 at the earliest, so I expect continued disruption between now and even beyond its eventual release date.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 20:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Really slow, apparently. Daniel Case (talk) 20:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Here are the recent diffs since the previous protection ended on April 11
 — Archer1234 (t·c) 00:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. DanCherek (talk) 01:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editors making unsourced and poorly sourced edits. Ravensfire (talk) 01:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:48, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – More of the same from socks of Algebraical (SPI); a /64 range was blocked a few days ago, but another IP has popped up to revert again. DanCherek (talk) 01:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Requesting semi-protection for a month+, slow edit warring by SPA IP/new account ignoring long-standing consensus and in-line request not to make this type of edit without discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed after protection expired. New users and IPs are not following MOS:EUPHEMISM. Lightoil (talk) 01:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Jakarta Goat vandal. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. El_C 06:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant vandalism. wizzito | say hello! 02:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Various editors keep treating this page like it's a recruitment tool. Skywatcher68 (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Template protection: Newly created TemplateStyles subpage has a lower level of protection than the main template page itself (Template:Marriage is currently set to require template editor access)Pedantical (talk) 03:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Template protected indefinitely. El_C 07:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Company under investigation for fraud. Adani team has been manipulating Wikipedia entries using sock puppet accounts to insert promotional material and remove or edit criticism (Signpost article)[1][2][3] DenverCoder9 (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. High amounts of IP vandalism since the article was unprotected Username6892 03:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:21, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed protection used by extended-confirmed-protected Module:Lua class * Pppery * it has begun... 03:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. El_C 07:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptions back soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 06:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 07:23, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism Darrelljon (talk) 06:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Pending-changes protected indefinitely. El_C 07:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: After removing the protection template on March 22, the page was edited by unknown IP users three times, repeatedly removing vital information about the group and its members and writing unverified facts. Heymikky (talk) 07:18, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Again? El_C 07:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection: Disruptive edits by both IP and new account. Fragrant Peony (talk) 23:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 07:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: high levels of back and forth edit wars on the infobox despite debate on the topic still being discussed on the talk page Matthew McMullin (talk) 00:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. OP p-blocked. El_C 06:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: high levels of back and forth edit wars on the infobox despite debate on the topic still being discussed on the talk page of the 2024 republican primary which is where a larger discussion is happening Matthew McMullin (talk) 00:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. OP p-blocked. El_C 06:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High increase in IP vandalism and the lack of false info without giving any citation proof Ninjamaster1099 (talk) 01:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

I couldn't quite follow that, but in any case: Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 06:53, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Recent and recurring vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Targivod (talkcontribs) 02:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 06:59, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Pederasty in ancient Greece (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Reason: Recent vandalismTargivod (talk) 02:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 07:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Editor making changes unsupported by citations and refusing to discuss rationale on talk page Sandcherry (talk) 02:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Indef p-block. El_C 07:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Yinavery (talk) 03:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yinavery, an IP has never edited that redirect. A redirect which has 3 edits in total (last one in March), anyway, so I'm at a loss at what you think the problem is. Feel free to add WP:DIFFs if it's something else. El_C 07:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because is not vandalism....... . 2402:800:63E9:150D:ACB2:60A5:D566:1575 (talk) 13:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected Courcelles (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Courcelles (talk) 13:40, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP jumping trolling and abuse. Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:20, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resuming after previous protection expired. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 13:06, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hijacking by Beacon Cash. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 15:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Bbb23 (talk) 16:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Excessive IP vandalism over the past few days. Ryanisgreat4444 (talk) 13:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Courcelles (talk) 13:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations run amok; please protect against IP edits for 60 days (30 does not seem like it will be long enough). Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Continued edit warring after previous page protection. Loafiewa (talk) 17:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Some user wants to change page name to Bhagyanagar. Needs move permission to extended confirmed users only. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 07:19, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Tousif.15, what move/s? Are you saying they moved the titled to Bhagyanagar? 'Cause I don't see it. El_C 07:31, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
As the actual name which was proposed by opposition party during election was Bhagyanagar but they can't move it there as there is already a draft so they moved it to Bhagyanagaram see this , there are many possibilities to be renamed as Bhagnagar, Bhagnagaram, etc. Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 07:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely.; logged under CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Note that it's already move-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Need Protection from permanent vandalism RALFFPL (talk) 07:42, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Request for semi-protection from permanent vandalism. RALFFPL (talk) 07:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Information is outdated and we are trying to update it with current information, specifically pertaining to the recruiting section of the page. Liljony420 (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and sockpuppetry. Uncle Spock (talk) 09:24, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for this action. I agree. After updating this page with reliable sources, including local newspapers and UK Companies House links, a user (or users) with the sole intention of reverting those edits without explanation, has stated that they wish to take legal action against me and to retrieve my IP address from Wiki. My edits contain no opinions, only facts gathered from reliable sources, which are cited. Evidence of sockpuppetry on the page can likely be detected from the edit history. RichiSups (talk) 11:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. sock puppet. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of vandalism. Anand 13:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Need Protection from permanent vandalism.

Declined I don't see what the problem is. Bbb23 (talk) 16:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 16:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

IP users keeps vandalizing the page. See history revision. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 15:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite Semi Protection: There's a lot of hostility between Ethiopians sometimes, quite frankly because of idiots - and a root of some hostility is religion. There's been a bunch of edits made by Ethiopian IP users and new users changing the religion statistic on infoboxes and sections, usually changing the statistic to an overwhelming muslim majority and christian minority. It isn't true, and is just propaganda - but this is not an outlier case, I believe it will keep happening with other IP users and hence why this page needs to be (in my opinion) protected to help fight this kind of vandalism which can easily get unnoticed at some point as there isn't a great amount of editor activity on this page. balladsone 09:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:11, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: An IP hopper has been trying to keep Vallyon's legal troubles off the page over the past couple of weeks. Blocking IP's range would stop them from editing but they haven't been the only disruption over the past year.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:14, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Amigao (talk) 20:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant misplaced help requests. The protection notice could be the same as that of Help talk:Introduction to images with VisualEditor. fgnievinski (talk) 23:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC). fgnievinski (talk) 23:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: fgnievinski, last edit was Nov 2022, so this is very Stale. What am I missing? El_C 07:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Folks are ignoring the Template:Wikipedia talk navigation notice, which states: "The purpose of this page is to discuss Wikipedia:Uploading images. If your post is about a specific problem you have with uploading an image, please ask for help at the Wikipedia:Help desk". Protecting the talk page will prevent the existing stale questions that never get an answer. fgnievinski (talk) 13:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. A page that hasn't been edited in six months needs a better reason for any protection, much less indef ECP, than this. Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended semi-protection: Please administrators semi-protect this article to "Indefinite extended semi-protection" level as few IPs are doing fan edits and writing the page in fan language which was written after several talk page consensus like plot being tabulised and cast being maintained according to original flow. Kindly look in the language used in titles which is totally fan language and semi-protect this page. Pri2000 (talk) 08:22, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Current IP [46] is picking up where the blocked IP left off [47] There was also an ANI discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#NOTHERE at Talk:Armenian genocide regarding this issue. Thank you.  // Timothy :: talk  17:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 73.173.64.115 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for 1 year consistent with previous IP's global lock. Daniel Case (talk) 18:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Post-archive note: that was the wrong IP, sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite move protection: Stop move war. Moxy- 19:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie. Favonian (talk) 21:17, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Adds unsourced content about Sony's acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery. LDM2003 (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Looks like this is a 4chan meme. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Current, repetitive disruption by IP, now new account. but who's to say they reset their IP addy and get back at it. - FlightTime (open channel) 19:09, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:26, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A user (User:Orinavor) has recently been blocked for nationalist editing of this article. They appear to be resuming while logged out[48]. — Czello (music) 19:15, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:32, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive eding by re-adding unsourced content to the article. Sricsi (talk) 19:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Page was full protected back in 2010 when Andonic changed usernames and became an admin. They are not currently an admin (since 2019) due to less activity.

I asked the protecting admin Xeno back on April 16th if they had any objections to a lowering/removal, but have not gotten a reply.

I don't see protection being necessary at this point, and I'd like to address the Tidy Font errors and other Lint on the page. Thank you, Zinnober9 (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotected. Just for the record, Xeno wasn't the protecting admin—Andonic protected it (under his old username), and Xeno just moved it to the new title while carrying out the rename. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Ah, so he did. My mistake. It had looked like Xeno had protected the page upon initial glance. Thank you for the assistance and the clarification. Zinnober9 (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

25 April 2023

Reason: Moderate level of vandalism Relativebalance (talk) 18:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism coming from various IP addresses. — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 05:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. Disruptive editing from socks of User:Grandmangojoy -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 04:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Socks blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.

Reason: Edit war due to new title introduced by WWE. LIJ4EVA (talk) 04:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

 Requesting immediate archiving...  Already done. El_C 06:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Bunch on people disagree on what the status of the Starship test was. McSly (talk) 01:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Engr. Smitty Werben 02:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 05:58, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 05:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 06:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive eding by re-adding unsourced content to the article. Sricsi (talk) 19:44, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:1013:B020:D3F7:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ohnoitsjamie. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 22:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
One IP got blocked, but the disruptive editing has not stopped. I’m asking for page protection to prevent this. Sricsi (talk) 05:31, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism after warning. CT55555(talk) 04:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Note: but CT55555, this is a concerning diff, since "far-right," at least (haven't looked into the QAnon bit) does seem to be supported by the citation. Are you aware of WP:COVIDCT? El_C 06:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets the "Note" template as "Jury's still out". Favonian (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I know, that's why I held it up. So they could respond. El_C 11:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: vandalism DodgeCharger1 (talk) 06:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Logged AE action. El_C 10:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant IP disruptive editing, perhaps use as a social media. Beyond My Ken (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users are constantly ignoring consensus. Request PP for the third time in three months. Unnamelessness (talk) 11:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:51, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – An IP user got blocked but the situation has not changed. Asking for page protection. Sricsi (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected I see the block, and I see the new IP. Courcelles (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: vandalism BlameRuiner (talk) 12:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. GENSEX stuff. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 12:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. invoking GENSEX. Courcelles (talk) 12:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP repeatedly trying to change infobox images, refusing to discuss on talk or follow WP:BRD Number 57 08:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Number 57, how does it make sense for you to say that the IP is refusing to discuss on talk when you haven't done so, either? The last comment added to that talk page was in 2016! El_C 11:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
My understanding of BRD has always been that the onus is on the party attempting to make a change to start a discussion and justify their proposal. However, I've started one. Number 57 11:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
No, that is not how it works, and at any event, BRD is optional. You are the experienced editor and admin, so you are expected to say something, anything, on the relevant talk page rather than steadfast limiting yourself to edit summaries like the IP has been doing. You seem to be using WP:BRD (and WP:ONUS?) as a blunt instrument, which as a result may serve as a barrier for entry (i.e. WP:BITE). I've cautioned you against this before.
All you had do is give a brief explanation of your position on the talk page, then link to it in the next edit summary, like so: IP, I've explained my position about the image on the talk page (link), please reply there. That IP may not know that the article talk page even exists as such to begin with, as some mobile versions do not display talk pages, which is why I link to these often in edit summaries, protection summaries, block summaries, and so on. El_C 12:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I mostly do start talk page discussions when there are disputes (e.g. here recently), but my long experience with IPs is that they don't engage and just continue to edit war until they are blocked, pages are protected or the other party gives up. Number 57 12:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
So long as IPs are allowed to edit, then you need to WP:AGF (within reason). If they don't respond, at least you tried, and then you can safely report that absence of WP:COMMUNICATION. But it first has to exist. And you'll likely save time and energy and cluttered revision histories, to boot. El_C 12:19, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 15:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Hello, we are seeing various IPs that geolocate to Korea that are edit warring to reintroduce their preferred version of some data in the infobox. The IPs are very likely the editor 망고소녀 editing while logged out. Blocking the user would likely not stop the disruption/edit warring, so page protection might be the best alternative. I don't know. I am heavily involved in maintenance of this article and can't take admin action myself, hence posting here for assistance. — Diannaa (talk) 13:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

I would like to request that... on

" Dylan Mulvaney 

Page please add a new section or just under career section:

Dylan has cultivated endorsements and sponsorships as her stardom rises, set to make $1m with the following brands :

Ulta Beauty MAC CeraVe Kate Spade Instalation Bud Light (editor to decide if included, 😬) Nike Love Beauty and planet Milk makeup Urban Decay Urlazh Haus Labs Neutrogena Native Svedka Vodka Crest OK Cupid SodaStream Tampax Aritzia K18 Hair KIND Snacks KitchenAid Ole Henriksen Rent the Runway Maybelline Plaza Hotel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fifoh (talkcontribs)

No. We do not put laundry lists of endorsements on articles because it looks flatly promotional. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 03:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Not doneFavonian (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IP editors making unsourced edits, probably related to some blocked socks. Ravensfire (talk) 13:35, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:39, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued disruptive IP editing - the most recent edit to this page is one the user has continued to insert despite being blocked for once already. Loafiewa (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 14:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: More IP vandalism. Temporarily protect this page for 6 months. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 15:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. IP vandalism, like from April 21. CastJared (talk) 15:48, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:50, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Launchballer 17:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Deepfriedokra: Any chance this could be upgraded to extended confirmed protection? It's users vandalising it now. Launchballer 19:43, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: free-for-all -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:15, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Per this edit summary, there's a concerted effort to add promotional content and links. bonadea contributions talk 18:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: 50 0f them, eh -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:30, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 19:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP users. DDMS123 (talk) 19:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jetstreamer Talk 14:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Jetstreamer, first you say "unsourced," then "no inline citation," then "unsourced" again. So which is it? El_C 15:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 21:11, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP user edits highly controversial topic, already discussed on the talk page. Also spams my talk page. Beshogur (talk) 17:27, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

[49], [50], [51]
User believes peace agreements signed and an unforced, willingful withdrawal = defeat. I only made the edit after seeing the sources someone else posted, not just from my own opinion. He should explain why the sources are wrong and not the revert me. 2A02:C7E:3011:FC00:6576:2DAC:C57A:471D (talk) 17:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. for a year. Please let me know (and/or re-request) if there is block evasion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. Beshogur (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Liancourt Rocks stuff. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 17:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Umm... why? Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks says nothing about indefinite semi-protection. Is there anything specific you're concerned about? ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
I guess I can remove the two RFPP's I made then. Maybe I was mistaken. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 17:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. Liancourt Rocks stuff. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 17:46, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

See above. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:05, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. from many IPs and probably an IP hopper -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 18:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Now they can go to the school library with their magic marker.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: New user vandalism PaulWicks (talk) 21:22, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: The article is still seeing cases of disruptive editing and vandalism almost every other day. Requesting further extended confirmed protection. HackerKnownAs (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Remove Indefinite Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing — The protection is not longer necessary because it didn't disruptive editing anymore by IP address is been a while for Semi protection since November 15, 2017 it has no expired set decreased protection needs to be done. 63.143.202.112 (talk) 19:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

This request verges on the incomprehensible. The argument seems to be that the protection is unnecessary because IP editors are no longer disrupting the page? Those IP editors wouldn't be able to edit the page; that's how semi-protection works. Not to say I'm against lowering the protection - I'm neutral - but this request isn't doing itself any favours. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 19:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done I think the middle of the playoffs is possibly the worst time to test unprotection for this article. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

26 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent re-addition of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 18:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent re-addition of uncited material. Onel5969 TT me 18:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: BLP policy violations – Several accounts have taken to removing sourced information and replacing it with promotional material; these are probably all the same account, but ECP should resolve the issue. Lindsey40186 (talk) 20:12, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Recent IP vandalism HarryKernow (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Tons of IPs posting things not related to discussion of the article. See: WP:NOTFORUM Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 22:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Cash net USA 204.102.74.20 (talk) 20:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This page has continued to be subjected to disruptive/unsourced edits since the last protection upgrade on 15 April 2023. Thank you. Ram1751 (talk) 01:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Similar to MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/log/2023, is receiving the same silliness. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs attacking quicker than I can revert. Moons of Io (talk) 03:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Seconding! We're getting about 8 IP edits per minute. —⁠Collint c 03:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Think this requires urgent attention 1keyhole (talk) 03:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:21, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 12:18, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Euryalus (talk) 12:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Heavy IP vandalism. Uncle Spock (talk) 12:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 12:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Full protection:Long-term abuse. 203.157.140.13 (talk) 12:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Creation protected – same as article. Favonian (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism – Users have been re-adding sections that were removed months ago, due to usage of unreliable sources. Despite my best efforts to revert the vandalism, it keeps getting undone. I think it's for the best if this gets page protected until further notice. BrickMaster02 (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Anachronist. Only for two weeks, though. Favonian (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced material. Ohnoitsjamie has reverted, I've reverted, potential sock edits at this point, as there is an open SPI. Onel5969 TT me 00:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Article has been moved to draft space. Favonian (talk) 10:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: This protection is unnecessary. A number of details on the page are incorrect and there has been no evidence of recent vandalism on any I'm A Celebrity-related Wikipedia page, which can be freely edited. Danny Balderdash (talk) 09:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

One week extended confirmed protection Major in the news article rapidly being changed in terms of POV. Heavy edit warring between confirmed accounts. Heavy influx of fresh accounts making copy edits. Possibly sock puppetery ongoing. Ecrusized (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

+1 Reason: rapid edit wars based on reliance of some users on unreliable sources and misinterpretation of content Borgenland (talk) 09:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

+1 mainly for edit warring FuzzyMagma (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

+1 The article is in a state of chaos. Protection is sorely needed. Festucalextalk 11:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

+1 Too much edit warring as of right now. Chaotic Enby (talk) 13:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't think WP:ECP is needed yet, though. El_C 16:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users keep on reinstating undiscussed changes. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 10:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary extended protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. More BLPVIO and disruptive editing- this time from autoconfirmed accounts. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 11:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by dynamic IP. Loafiewa (talk) 15:38, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator ScottishFinnishRadish. Favonian (talk) 15:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

X Karanmisrakhanzihan (talk) 12:31, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done – Request by sock. Favonian (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced material. Ohnoitsjamie has reverted, I've reverted, potential sock edits at this point, as there is an open SPI. Onel5969 TT me 00:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:12, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long term semi protection I previously asked the protection to be removed in February. Unfortunately the anon IPs have come back again to vandalise the page. LibStar (talk) 03:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Maybe try again in a few months...? El_C 16:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple users; re-ordering the episode list, despite it being correct before. Despite my best efforts to revert, it keeps getting undone. BrickMaster02 (talk) 03:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nswix (talk) 03:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent vandalism. Stopped for a while but just started up again. Needs protection. Editors cannot keep reverting these disruptive edits. Maineartists (talk) 15:51, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Continued disruptive editing after protection expired. Chlod (say hi!) 15:58, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Can an admin please semi-protect this page so the frequent edit-warring by IPs doesn't get added whilst the article may be at ITN. Ollieisanerd (talk) 15:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive edits by IPs ongoing for months (more than 30 times since January 2023). Since the page is just a list of capitals, no regular edits are foreseen here. Requesting long term semi protection against such IP edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Markus Buchheit is a german polititian, his main wikipedia article (wikipedia.de) has been constantly vandalised please protect https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Markus_Buchheit https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Buchheit https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Buchheit

Thanks in advance, Rony. Kd-Ron (talk) 14:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Furthermore, administrators on the English language Wikipedia cannot protect pages on other Wikipediæ. Favonian (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Less Unless (talk) 16:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Currently under attack from ip hopping vandal -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 16:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Discospinster. Favonian (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated addition of copyright violating material by a slew of new editors. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:34, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same person using different IPs and now an account to evade their block. Amaury17:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Markus Buchheit is a german polititian, his main wikipedia article (de.wikipedia) has been constantly vandalised Sorry that i ´m refereing to an article that is in german, i ´m using the google translate extension

the article has been constantly vandalised The proof of the politically uninteresting personal relationship with Ms. Nagle contains numerous insults and defamation The proof is available in [2]

please revert it to the oldid=228894043 https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Markus_Buchheit&oldid=228894043

i will ask you to increase protection for https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Markus_Buchheit also

Thanks in advance, Rony. Kd-Ron (talk) 14:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done@Kd-Ron: Please see this reply to your earlier request. Favonian (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Not yet at the point of persistent, but they are currently the targets of an online TERF brigade (search them in the news, they're front page in Ireland and on the BBC) after JKR tweeted about them and I expect disruption will only increase at this point. Could we get semi protection for at least a week please?. Blue Edits (talk) 12:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Blue Edits, relist if problems reach that point. El_C 15:55, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. GENSEX -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 13:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Last edit April 3, so quite Stale now. El_C 15:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Arbitration Enforcement. GENSEX -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 13:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Last edit March 10, so quite Stale now. El_C 15:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism. Somebody is angry about governance reform and using the page to editorialise. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 14:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. El_C 15:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Article is attracting a lot of non-neutral edits today; the most recent contributor has an obvious conflict of interest. I've left messages at the other editors' user talk pages encouraging them to tone down the prose, to no avail.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism, thank you. Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:42, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. El_C 16:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent mobile IP vandalism. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
/64 range blocked for vandalizing Naked (1993 film) had also been targeting this article. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Just a temporary semi-protect? IP jumper vandalizing the page by purposely re-introducing bad grammar and punctuation after multiple reverts... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. LTA sockpuppets -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Both of them. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. LTA/Sock vandalizing -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 17:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: SuperMobile motherboard settings (talk · contribs) blocked by HJ Mitchell. indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Per RedWard tools, it shows that the article has moderate to high level of vandalism. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 17:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Nothing the editors aren't on top of. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent mobile IP vandalism. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 18:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2A00:23C5:4748:1701:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 19:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Born name vandalism. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. None today, and two instances in the four days before. Daniel Case (talk) 19:09, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 19:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: AaaaaaAQAAQAAQSaaaaa (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. indefinitely for username and as VOA. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

27 April 2023

Reason: The Wikipedia.de page of Markus Buchheit has been constantly vandalised, i already put a request there but i will like to ask you if you can protect this one because it has risk of vandalism. Kd-Ron (talk) 19:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined@Kd-Ron: You have been told twice that we have no jurisdiction over the German Wikipedia, and that the article on this Wiki won't be protected preemptively! Favonian (talk) 19:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry for that, i thought that this article was from the english wikipedia. Kd-Ron (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: New user and IP keeps adding incorrect birth name of "Bradford Bradford" citing an interview with his mother as the source, despite that interview specifically stating that he did not have the surname Bradford until he was 7 (adopting it upon his mother's separation from his father) RedPatch (talk) 21:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent vandalism & BLP vios. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 00:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Editing past 3RR, COI. Sario528 (talk) 20:28, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 00:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Second request, hopping IP disruption. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

@NinjaRobotPirate: After your recent edit, maybe you might consider actioning this request. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's probably going to need to be protected again from multiple sock farms. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, Eagles articles seem to be a main attraction. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Whew... Five PPs in the space of two years, and every—single—time it gets IP vandalised the very same day the PP expires. Clearly the IP(s) have a damn alarm clock set to go off. I've been editing 16 years and have never seen anything like it. How about a year this time? Two years? Indefinite...? Pretty please? Mac Dreamstate (talk) 19:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 08:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Template protection: High-risk template – 74K and counting transclusions. * Pppery * it has begun... 22:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. El_C 08:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: The article is currently not protected at all following a dispute lock; please restore the earlier level of protection. Nythar (💬-🍀) 04:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Attention needed before people notice the page isn't locked. — Nythar (💬-🍀) 05:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
DoneFavonian (talk) 06:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 06:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 08:35, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP, then new-user, axe-grinding that disagrees with a forced amalgamation at the start of this year. Four levels of warning have been issues, with the fourth on the new user's Talk page. This is the type that argues that we're not Russia so something can't legally happen.

User talk:129.222.189.53 for early warnings

User talk:BadWolf0081 for final warning G. Timothy Walton (talk) 23:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SuperBowlfan123 (talk) 00:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Given current events, and the edits that have been made on this article, best to protect for the time being until this blows over. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 01:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 5 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Vandalism. Someone has vandalized my page. I fixed it but worry they will try again. JjamieMarsh (talk) 04:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. But also, JjamieMarsh, generally you should not be editing an article about yourself since that is a conflict of interest. Which is to say, it is not your page, you do not WP:OWN it. Adding comments, concerns, citations (like for an unsourced Ancestry DNA thingy), and so on to the article talk page (Talk:Jamie Marsh) is fine and is in fact encouraged. I'll add the pertinent documentation about that to your user talk page. El_C 09:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism, and disruptive edits in the past few weeks. There's going on a dispute between India and Pakistan, Pakistan will host 2023 Asia Cup but India doesn't want to go there. Following this, unregistered Indian and Pakistani editors are continuously changing the host name, and making persistent vandalism. See the page history for evidence. RoboCric Let's chat 06:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hey, this request concerning a Cup article wasn't that hard to parse — what gives!? El_C 09:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 08:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: requesting semi-protection due to repeated addition of unsourced content by unregistered users. McPhail (talk) 08:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article subject is edit warring her own article. - FlightTime (open channel) 02:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. El_C 09:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Periodic IP vandalism. It's on front page at the moment, which is likely why it's attracting more vandals than usual. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High levels of IP vandalism on BLP. Wikipedialuva (talk) 10:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator DatGuy. Favonian (talk) 14:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Misspelled category name; should be Category:YouTubers. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 13:05, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Sdrqaz. Favonian (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 10:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Mixture of vandalism, edit warring, and just general page instability. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP users (other than myself) are putting a PR spin on recent controversy to tone down the facts and implications of Pinkerton/WotC actions reported by news media, it seems likely that one or more corporate PR firms are "handling" the public reaction to events. There are sufficient citable credible sources to justify including the reported facts in the page. 2A00:1110:117:A5B7:1858:3B79:AFBE:1557 (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion, three different IPs restoring old edits from User:Iptesh Kumar Meher within an hour of the previous page protection expiring. Belbury (talk) 10:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Similar case to Hololive Production and Gawr Gura which were also semi'ed recently. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 10:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruption by IP socks of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syntaktis123. HistoryofIran (talk) 11:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 16:43, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring over cast listing by at least nine different IPs in the last 12 hours (it actually goes back through weeks of disruption). A talk page discussion has been started to seek consensus for the cast listing. Need protection to drive new/anonymous editors to discuss on the talk page.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 13:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:34, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Continuous edit warring and vandalism by IP. Dinoz1 (chat?) 14:14, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. Already included in edit notices, but repeatedly ignored by many users. Actualcpscm (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. As WP:ARBPIA. El_C 16:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Early stages of IP vandalism. Subject is a political candidate whose election will be held on June 6, 2023. Requesting semi-protection (or whichever level is deemed appropriate) until that date. Woko Sapien (talk) 15:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. Courcelles (talk) 16:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Block evasion -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 18:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Widr.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued removal of sourced content by multiple IPs. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 18:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

1 week extended confirmed protection. In The News (ITN) article being heavily edited. Edit warring between newly created autoconfirmed accounts. Possible sock puppetery ongoing. Ecrusized (talk) 13:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Editor requesting this has an agenda to make them able to edit the page by themselves only and they're reverting against 3 editors. RCB88 (talk) 13:09, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Wait for the SPI, but otherwise: Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 16:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs continue to add an unsourced "population". PamD 13:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Note that IP activity began on 21-22 March with an attempt to hijack the Netherfield dab page for an unsourced article on this village. I created a sourced stub at the appropriate title, but I'm getting weary of reverting IP editor(s) who seem determined to add a spurious population figure, claiming the 1870s figure as being a 2011 one. PamD 14:21, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. /64 blocked 2 weeks. El_C 16:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring between unregistered and recently registered editors. MarioGom (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Last edits from those accounts was April 23, so nothing too recent. Feel free to relist if that changes. El_C 16:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

28 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Anon's ongoing flag (edit)war started in January. [52] No discussion since. Pelmeen10 (talk) 23:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Pelmeen10, articles about Leagues and Cups tend to be the most challenging requests to parse on this board. The problem is due to poor edit summaries combined with the insularity of the subject matter. So, for example, your latest edit (April 26) that has an edit summary that reads top3 — what is happening there? Were edits by IPs immediately prior reverted? Were those edits disruptive? It isn't easy to tell what's what is the point. El_C 09:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm not involved in the edit war, my edit was not reverting any other user. It was unconnected, as listing top4 makes no sense. Edit war between anons is mostly this [53] [54] / [55] [56] Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Pelmeen10, the definitions might overlap and be somewhat fluid, but generally, reverting disruption is not considered edit warring. Even if it might not necessarily fall under the edit warring exemption in a strict sense (i.e. for our purposes, it being limiting it to "obvious vandalism," mostly so that it cannot be WP:GAMEd).
What I'm getting at, however, is two things: 1. I can't tell when disruption has been reverted, because for whatever reason veteran editors of League and Cup articles generally tend to provide poor or unclear edit summaries, especially when reverting unsourced or disruptive edits, thus making it rather opaque for uninvolved reviewers to parse absent direct pointers/diffs. And 2. I can't tell when disruption has been reverted recently, because generally (though not exclusively), what is actionable on this board is for disruption to have happened in hours and days rather than in weeks and months. Otherwise, it starts to become Stale.
Anyway,  Requesting immediate archiving... but feel free to relist if new problems arise — though, again, if edit summaries are unclear, maybe add some pertinent diffs. HTH. El_C 01:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Several IP edits have attempted to censor this page in recent days. See:

User(s) blocked. /64 p-blocked. El_C 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption resumed after protection expired. Lightoil (talk) 00:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBGENSEX + Disruptive editing from SPA's and other autoconfirmed accounts. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 19:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. El_C 01:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 22:38, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Done and logged. El_C 01:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Event takes place tonight, 8 pm ET (12 am UTC). There already has been vandalism over the past couple of days, and things will get worse later this evening. Please semi-protect for 12 hours. bender235 (talk) 19:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. While the page is being edited very actively, I'm just not seeing enough disruption right now. Relist in the (likely) case that that changes. El_C 01:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent vandalism from multiple IPs. gobonobo + c 23:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Done. El_C 02:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Regular, persistent IP vandalism against the same targeted passage. Request permanent semi-protection. Pertains to arbitration on Indian articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Done due to WP:CASTE aspects. El_C 02:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because ....... . 95.214.53.28 (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because the risk of new attacks on the page seem low. 95.214.53.28 (talk) 20:12, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

1 person got reverted n the last month, surely that's not enough to justify it. I think you should reconsider.95.214.54.66 (talk) 00:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
That one revision occured while the page was semi-protected. Looking at the reason as to why the page was protected, I see no good reason to unprotect. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 01:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Oh, I see what's going on here... 47.227.95.73 (talk) 01:07, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Note IP trolls from the past 24-hours. Please up protection for a brief period. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 21:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done for now. Holding off, because your warning might have worked, seeing as they have not vandalized or otherwise edited the page since. El_C 01:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – A lot of BLP-violative stuff is being added and reverted recently due to personal matters in his life. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 02:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Talk Page has been hit by an exhaustively repetitive string of WP:SPAs, making the same tired "ITS BIASED!" tirades. Zaathras (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 03:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – An anonymous editor who seems to be a sockpuppet of User:Syun respect for music has been adding poorly translated content. PetéWarrior (talk) 03:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Petewarrior: I take your point but this is the first protection for that article and things have to be escalated on a demonstrated-need basis. Johnuniq (talk) 04:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Very persistent IP vandalism (by 136.158.35.113 at 15:23, 28 December 2022, by 136.158.17.104 at 01:51, 18 January 2023, and by 136.158.34.170 (talk) at 17:15, 24 March 2023). 49.147.250.222 (talk) 04:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Requesting indefinite protection of a highly visible template. Sanglahi86 (talk) 04:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

We generally leave protecting templates for a bot which applies a uniform procedure. The template has 196 transclusions which is, as I recall, not enough for "high risk". OTOH, perhaps leaving the door open for easy vandalism amplification is not desirable. Thoughts from others? If anyone wants to protect at any level, please do so without a need for consultation. This comment is just me being unsure. Johnuniq (talk) 04:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Semi-protected indefinitely. Less than 200 transclusions, so barely qualifies for semi, not to mention higher protection levels like WP:ECP and WP:TPROT. Transclusions might increase in the future, which is why I erred on the side of semi in the end. El_C 04:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Whew... Five PPs in the space of two years, and every—single—time it gets IP vandalised the very same day the PP expires. Clearly the IP(s) have a damn alarm clock set to go off. I've been editing 16 years and have never seen anything like it. How about a year this time? One thousand years? Indefinite...? Pretty please? 2A00:23C7:E493:E701:4560:7FA1:6475:E467 (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:20, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent unsourced additions to a biography of a living person. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 13:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Various IPs keep adding non-neutral info about Sripathi Sathish Kuma, one of the subject's sons.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 13:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

SCHWETTMANN TECHNOLOGIES IS A GLOBAL SOLUTIONS PROVIDER, AND WE ARE DEVOTED IN PUTTING GREAT IDEAS INTO ACTION, WHETHER YOU ARE INTERESTED IN MICROSOFT CLOUD SOLUTIONS OR WISH TO TRANSFORM INTO A DIGITAL LEADER. Umarakhtar2224 (talk) 09:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Not done – Wikipedia is not a marketing platform. Favonian (talk) 10:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Raladic (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. (1 month semi). Airplaneman (talk) 16:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nagol0929 (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Comment: this needs to be semi'ed ASAP. It's getting targeted by so many different IPs (possibly open proxies) at once! — AP 499D25 (talk) 14:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Already protected by administrator RickinBaltimore. (indef semi). Airplaneman (talk) 16:21, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Edits to Theatre and Disability page:

I have significant concerns about the vast amount of material you have deleted from the Theatre and Disability article. Much of the deleted material was of great value to the community of performers with disabilities, and many of the contributions were made by members of the disability community, including those with intellectual disabilities. They absolutely deserve the opportunity to advocate for themselves, and holding this page to the standards you imposed through deletions rather than edits takes away their voice. Yes, this article is need of significant improvement, but better to tag it as such or make edits that improve the existing material rather than mass deletion of content. I invite you to revert your edits. Thanks very much! 2606:8180:5001:A2:F80C:6601:3E5E:DA53 (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Pinging Drmies – Muboshgu (talk) 17:40, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Please discuss the article at Talk:Theatre and disability. People at WP:Teahouse could explain that Wikipedia articles need to focus on encyclopedic information—they are not a substitute for Facebook. Johnuniq (talk) 07:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Not doneFavonian (talk) 10:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you all. Johnuniq, you said it well. Drmies (talk) 13:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Only for 1 year. Adnan (ᵀᵃˡᵏ) 08:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ItsMdAdnan, what do you mean only for 1 year? One year is not an only, it's a lot. El_C 19:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing. Raladic (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Alexf. Favonian (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing content dispute. Dronebogus (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined: talk pages are for discussing content disputes. I see no reason this needs further protection at this time. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Sockpuppetry. LTA -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 18:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ks0stm. Favonian (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Consistent vandalism and sockpuppetry. Likely related to the current conflicts in Ethiopia like the OLA insurgency BaklavaEnjoyer (talk) 09:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. OP blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Logged AE action. El_C 20:03, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Some IP users (one of them is blocked for 60 hours) are just removing contents/references for no reasons. PJ Santos (talk) 09:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The film has just released, and users are hijacking this article to show info exclusive to Part II. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by ipsocks of blocked vandal User:Nazif haruna. MrOllie (talk) 14:41, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Subtle vandalism over months, many a times protected but the issue continues. Requestion permanent semi protection. zoglophie 17:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Continued vandalism after recent protection period expired. 73.67.145.30 (talk) 17:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Many IPs publishing the purported address of another Wikipedia editor. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Zzuuzz. El_C 20:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism/unsourced edits are resumed after each one year of temporary protection is removed. 2A00:23C7:E493:E701:D0B4:36F9:FAB9:4ABA (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Done. El_C 20:24, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent multiple IP editors changing the name of Snowdonia to Eryri. Per the discussion on the talk page, this is not being done per WP:COMMONNAME. None of the IPs will engage on the talk page. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 19:59, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 20:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Amaury21:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Amaury21:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Unconstructive edits from IPs. LancedSoul (talk) 21:26, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: I had reviewed the article's draft and I accept the draft in AFC review but the page is protected so requesting unprotection. NP83 (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: Please hold on responding to this request. There are some technical anomalies with the article creation I'm investigating. Ponyobons mots 18:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
@Ponyo Can you brief a little about what's technical anomalies of the page you're talking about? NP83 (talk) 19:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Not at this time. There's no urgency in unprotecting the page and I need to review something first.-- Ponyobons mots 19:19, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
@Ponyo As you guide, for now holding the AFC submission. You review what you are reviewing, please let me know once you complete. NP83 (talk) 19:25, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected Requesting party blocked.  Requesting immediate archiving... Ponyobons mots 21:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

29 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Nagol0929 (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. El_C 20:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:199.119.233.146/WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Entuziazm. Loafiewa (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Loafiewa, could you please explain the connection, using diffs containing the same or similar edits in this article? I'm not immediately seeing it. Thanks. El_C 20:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Unprotection: this page was set to pending changes indefinite long ago for some reason, not clear why that remains necessary (editor who placed it left Wikipedia in 2020). soibangla (talk) 19:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected I just suppressed the last IP edit there, and the two anon edits before that were made by an IP blocked as a sock. I don't see any reason to remove the pending changes from this BLP. Ponyobons mots 20:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Seasider53 (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 23:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Influx of joke edits, page got shown on a twitch stream. Davepeta (talk) 22:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ponyo. El_C 23:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: There's a vandalism problem with this page, in particular anonymous ips and hate speech additions.

I think it's needs either pending changes or semi-protection. As less seasoned editors watch this page, once evidence around the case stops. There are going to be less people to reverse such highly disruptive edits or to check them. LoomCreek (talk) 22:57, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if the issue persists after the protection is over. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 23:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
okay thank you so much LoomCreek (talk) 00:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism resuming immediately after previous protection expired. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion. Amaury21:10, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP edit warring. Ermenrich (talk) 21:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. El_C 23:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued use of unreliable source by anonymous editors. -- Alex_21 TALK 00:20, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 00:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP will not discuss, continues to edit war. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Question: Peacemaker67, you already protected the page a week ago, so why do you need to post a request for it now? Also, we don't usually protect just on account of one (or even two) user(s), so that protection and this request are a bit confusing to me. El_C 23:50, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
I just felt that me as an admin and also the primary editor on the article, I might be seen as having a conflict of interest if I just kept protecting it when the matter could appear to a layperson to be a matter of opinion rather than straight out vandalism (or probably right-wing POV editing). However, it was also obvious IP edit-warring without any intention of discussing. I deal with a lot of vandalism of articles in the WWII Yugoslavia space and generally try to avoid sending them all here. What do you think? Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Well, as mentioned, the general practice when it's just one (or even 2) user/s is to block rather than protect. As for that IP, specifically, on closer look, I amended the 36 hours EW block to a month DE one with TPA disabled due to racist provocations. Anyway, hope that helps for next time and sorry you had to deal with that nonsense. El_C 00:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... El_C 04:40, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A group of editors keep changing the album name "Wake Up & It's Over" to "Up Wake & Over It's". — AP 499D25 (talk) 01:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Deadman137 (talk) 01:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Current event. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism has worsened maybe semi. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 01:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Bagumba (talk) 03:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP and new account vandalism. UCO2009bluejay (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

No worries, UCO2009bluejay. Already protected by administrator Bagumba. El_C 04:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. from ip hopper. -- Wesoree (talk·contribs) 02:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Mifter. El_C 04:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. 1keyhole (talk) 02:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.
Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 1keyhole, that is not a content dispute, it's vandalism. El_C 04:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of templates since days ago. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 03:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This talk page is being targeted by LTA vandals. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:43, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:56, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Continued harassment from various IPs (open proxies?) shortly after expiration of previous protection. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:57, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 04:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. – bradv 04:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Latest protection was for three years. It did not appear to have had a meaningful impact. El_C 05:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: IP vandalism has started again after protection expired. What do these people have against Sri Lankan broadcasters, anyway? This isn't the only article on the topic that keeps having chunks taken out of it. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv 05:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Also, tgeorgescu, I'm not gonna try to guess who the socks is, but maybe take it to WP:SPI. El_C 04:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. GimliDotNet (talk) 05:56, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ks0stm (TCGE) 05:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Resumed vandalism by IP sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Syntaktis123. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Whew... Five PPs in the space of ten years, and every—single—time it gets IP vandalised the very same day the PP expires. Clearly the IP(s) have a damn alarm clock set to go off. I've been editing 16 years and have never seen anything like it. How about a year this time? Ten years? Indefinite...? Pretty please? 2A00:23C7:E493:E701:60A1:4184:F631:4F15 (talk) 06:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-disruption. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Current edit war. Equine-man (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism mainly by newly registered users over the past 6 hours or so. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disrupting editing by IP and sockpuppets of it, refer to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Incivility in talk and edit summaries from MrOllie, ultimate result is disruptive editing. for more details. Raladic (talk) 15:13, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 16:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm glad you decided to collaborate. SMH. Will you at least engage on the discussion page? 207.236.147.164 (talk) 17:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion. Mori Calliope fan talk 18:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator PhilKnight. Favonian (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: A protection is needed only if a vandalism is repeated. 95.134.111.98 (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Talk page of a sockpuppet. The user is guilty of serial vandalism and harassment, therefore subject to WP:DENY. Favonian (talk) 17:11, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm asking to unprotect that page, not to protect. See my first comment — I wrote there a reason for removing protection. 95.134.111.98 (talk) 17:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Favonian's responce is actually a very good reason to not unprotect.
 Requesting immediate archiving...Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 17:33, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Users who used to commit vandalism on WP, including the Windows 10 page, are no longer active for a couple months. 95.134.111.98 (talk) 17:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Your assumption is wrong. IP socks of the vandal in question still pop up. 92.53.16.94 appears to one. Favonian (talk) 17:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
I can't find that 92.53.16.94 edited the Windows 10 article, since the Windows 10 article was protected previous year. The IP Address, 92.53.16.94 made its
s first edit this year. 95.134.111.98 (talk) 17:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Ip address vandalism. Monhiroe (talk) 09:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article is constantly targeted by brand new users / IPs who wants to change the result to "Hotaki victory" without bothering to cite even one a source, nor read the article or the actual discussions about it. HistoryofIran (talk) 10:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SuperBowlfan123 (talk) 16:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP/sock spam vandalizing. WikiVirusC(talk) 20:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:23, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Carpimaps (talk) 12:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing. Waxworker (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing by unregistered users where they constantly revert a well-established consensus and the belonging comment without any explanation. FrB.TG (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 22:19, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Gattor1 (talk) 21:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected. Since 2019, in fact. No IPs in sight. Favonian (talk) 22:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

30 April 2023

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by multiple IP users, vandalism performed includes manipulating of facts. ⭐️ Starkex ⭐️ 📧 ✍️ 13:33, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Question: Starkex, can you explain what's happening wrt the sources and numbers, it's unclear and edit summaries provide limited info. Thanks. El_C 20:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Apparently there are two IP users modifying population sources to their claims citing that the population of Urdu speakers in Pakistan is 30 million whereas according to 2017 census of Pakistan the population is 15 million. Starkex (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, I get that. What confuses me is that the MQM-P does not come across as that fringe, at least not to the extent that it would claim there being double the population of the census. Something seems off there, so I was wondering if you knew what the basis for their 30m claim was.
Almost certainly, though, the census data ought to reflect the population figures. I was just curious. But I forgot to ask the main question I intended to: did the IP only add that information those two times? Thanks. El_C 10:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
No there were two separate IPs and both changed the population figure from 15 million to 30 million. Starkex (talk) 12:31, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
A non-answer? Okay... Anyway, as for the IP/s, they're not exactly separate as they're both from the same range. But since the last edit was about two days ago, I'm gonna hold off and close the request as Declined for now. Feel free to relist if there are further issues. And also free to yes-answer when you do so (or at least acknowledge a non-answer if you opt for that). Either way, good luck. Hope it works out. El_C 21:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent pov pushing this past week or two. Brand new users/IPs try to change the (sourced) result in the infobox, either removing it or adding "Afghan victory". HistoryofIran (talk) 22:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Zsinj. Favonian (talk) 23:32, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: After 13 years, semi-protection is probably no longer necessary. An anonymous editor requested at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry#Talk:Fire that the page be unprotected. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined as it is a level-2 vital article, and is an ongoing target for vandalism. As the article isn't a topic that requires constant updating, the talk page of the article should be sufficient for any IP to request changes. Dennis Brown - 21:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Edit-warring as noted on the talk page [57][58]. DrKay (talk) 07:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Fears of edit warring do not necessarily mean it is actually happening. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: BLP that seems to have been attracting a high level of vandalism or otherwise disruptive editing from IP users and new accounts, particularly over the past day but also relatively frequently for at least a couple of weeks now. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Lots of IPs trying to remove references to her various conspiracy theories. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 00:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 01:09, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Unregistered vandalist claims Finns own a pet reindeer. Fwejg-94j9-5 (talk) 22:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just some joker from Campbell University. Favonian (talk) 22:50, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The admin who protected this template page has retired and I'm yet to see any vandalism or disruption on it since then. If it still needs the protection lock because of "preying socks and vandals", well.... Intrisit (talk) 10:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Note: {{Non-free reduced}} is a redirect. I assume you meant the target, {{Orphaned non-free revisions}}, and have changed the request accordingly. The protecting admin for the target, Xymmax, is still active and hereby notified. Personally, I oppose unprotecting the template as it's transcluded in 740 pages. Favonian (talk) 10:38, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
The reason you don't see vandalism or disruption is because it IS protected. That means it's working. I would also oppose for the reason Favonian gives. Dennis Brown - 21:05, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for the ping. I do think that the template warrants continued protection for the reasons Favonian and Dennis Brown mention. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 23:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected per cabal consensus. Favonian (talk) 23:30, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Protected for 10 years, less likely that this article will receive vandalism since Romney is no longer involved in politics and was not a significant political individual. 162.219.198.189 (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

  • I will leave open, but I would decline as her husband is considering a run for President, and that will draw more attention to her article. If he doesn't run (planned to announce early summer), then there would be a stronger reason to remove semi, although there is also a good case for leaving it even then. Dennis Brown - 20:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Not unprotected per Dennis. In American politics, it ain't over till it's over. Favonian (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A look at this page's edit history suggests that it has gone through persistent vandalism by IPs. Mixmon (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:00, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: Unsourced edits are resumed after each one year of temporary protection is removed. 2A00:23C7:E493:E701:2C7D:2ABE:7164:B018 (talk) 17:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite Semi-protection:: High level of vendalism, as one of the most popular TV reality shows (Malayalam language adaptation of Big Brother, people frequently enter incorrect/favored edits and comments in the page. A look at this page's edit history. Mims Mentor (talk) 17:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can see that more will be needed after a week but this is the first protection and we have to escalate. Johnuniq (talk) 05:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Page was upgraded from a long-term pending changes protection to a shorter term semi-protect earlier. The semi-protect has expired, so I request reinstatement of the original long-term pending changes protection, or an extension of the semi-protection that recently expired given the propensity for certain LTAs to go after the page about me and add RD2/RD3/doxxing content (see also: Brianna Wu, Turning Red, etc) Lizthegrey (talk) 18:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

There needs to be disruption to justify protection. See WP:PREEMPTIVE. Unless there is disruption, it will be unprotected per policy. I would report it again if someone tries to do something as you described. From the edit history, I don't see how pending changes would help if the person responsible for the vandalism has autoconfirmed sockpuppets, but the Kiwi Farms hate raid died down a while ago, so it should be fine. 93.109.111.66 (talk) 20:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Not done for now. I have the article on my watchlist in case disruption starts again. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 00:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Vandalism and match predictions by unknown IPs MNWiki845 (talk) 20:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Have almost 4500+ transclusion (Direct or Indirect), request for Extended confirmed protection. Prarambh20 (talk) 23:17, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 05:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 04:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:32, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Temporary semi-protection – Persistent harassment from block evading IP editor. This is the second request on this, but this time I am making the request myself. Also, blocking this latest IP would be advisable. --IJBall (contribstalk) 04:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent WP:BLP violations, defamatory content. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. Article just seems like a trouble magnet, ngl. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 04:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 05:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:A/I/PIA. nableezy - 05:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC) 05:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism by IP users. Clyde H. Mapping (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 07:04, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continual addition of unsourced material and disruptive editing. Sciencefish (talk) 08:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism – Ongoing page move vandalism. (Page title should be: Janism). — kashmīrī TALK 09:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Move protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-prot for just under one decade. Maybe time to give unprotecting a trial? Peanut may be worth considering too, though that's been semied for "merely" 3 years. Up to admin discretion I guess. 47.155.41.201 (talk) 21:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Another that I will leave open for more opinions, but being a vital article, I would decline unprotection. Same for Peanut. There aren't any rapidfire changes needed for these articles, the talk page works just fine for minor changes by IPs. Dennis Brown - 21:06, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Comment: The question one should ask in these cases is not "why is this protected" but "what reason would a random new editor have to edit it that couldn't be handled via edit request?"
Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: While this is not being vandalized repeatedly, it IS the featured article on the front page, and therefore should have some form of page protection. HeartCat1💬📝 02:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Johnuniq (talk) 07:03, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive & sock editing by a dynamic Bulgarian IP. LDM2003 (talk) 10:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive & sock editing by a dynamic Bulgarian IP. LDM2003 (talk) 10:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Previous BLP-infringing editor is back adding the same content. Full protection (or pending changes perhaps) while any discussions take place would be very useful. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Partial block from this particular article for 3 months. Favonian (talk) 10:47, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and not providing reliable sources. LDM2003 (talk) 10:46, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 10:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because I want to spread more information with historical sourcesSabhajeet Chandel (talk) 07:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

+1 Reason: Because I want to spread more history and information from contemporary sources and historical sources Sabhajeet Chandel (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Not unprotected – Please use an edit request to request specific changes to be made to the protected page. Favonian (talk) 10:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism coming from various IPs and new account. — AP 499D25 (talk) 11:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism coming from various new accounts. — AP 499D25 (talk) 12:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and got rid of a couple VOAs. Courcelles (talk) 14:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: IP edits have been POV pushing. GENSEX topic Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Note: This was done as a logged AE action. Courcelles (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 Requesting immediate archiving... Bot interprets a "Note" template as "Jury's still out". Favonian (talk) 15:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism/removal of content since previous protection expired. —MelbourneStartalk 13:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by Bulgarian IPs. LDM2003 (talk) 11:31, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Long-term semi-protection - Since the previous semi-ended, the history has been random garbage/forumesque edits from IPs and reverts of same - i.e. more or less the same situation as before. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v Source assessment notes 14:34, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 18 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles (talk) 14:43, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Surge of vandalism from what seems to be a sock farm/IP. Nate (chatter) 15:24, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, Bot, a request for unprotection was denied, but the protecting admin overruled it. The result was – unsurprising. Favonian (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 15:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
  • Didn't see it was previously protected long-term, but we likely won't be making that mistake again. Thanks for the quick action and oversighting. Nate (chatter) 15:44, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing محرر البوق (talk) 12:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:49, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a wide variety of IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit dispute seems to be occurring where an IP user seems to be unwilling to engage in chat occurring in WP:HIGHEREDREP and keeps adding disputed information. Wozal (talk) 17:48, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Editors are having a dispute over the name of the railway station, as the station signage and network maps depict "Wattle Glen" while the government gazetted "Wattleglen" as one word. Purin128AL (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: One new section has a noteworthy piece on this public figure, but various anon IP addresses either revert it or have added what is, essentially, dross. I suggest it be semi-protected, if possible. Thanks :) NoPolymath (talk) 14:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ZLEA T\C 15:33, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. CastJared (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Bbb23 (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Vandalism from newly created accounts that are probably the same person. Dawnseeker2000 15:53, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. If any more socks show up, the article will be protected. Favonian (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Mtattrain (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 18:10, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued addition of unsourced claims of the place of the bands formation by hopping IP. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 2600:1700:5aed:1000::/64 (talk · contribs). For a week. Favonian (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 17:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Long-term redirect overwriting, now against the consensus of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wait for You (Maelyn Jarmon song). Jalen Folf (talk) 19:08, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Aintabli (talk) 20:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP Policy Violations. CastJared (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Favonian (talk) 17:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism and disruption. Novemberjazz 19:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

DeclinedWarn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Their edits do not really constitute WP:VANDALISM, but they are admittedly rather disruptive. Only if the IP range continues after being warned does it become sanctionable. Favonian (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent name change, and down grading of the fully fledged city of Pimpri-Chinchwad to a mere suburb or neighborhood of the City of Pune by IP accounts. Jonathansammy (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: 202.136.69.223 (talk · contribs). For two weeks. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Reason: Months long disruption by Chile-based dynamic IP (deceptive edit summaries; changing films' billing block credits; changing reference titles/headlines). Warned many times; some page protections; some blocks by proxy bot; etc. Recent edit warring, too.

Latest IP: 190.21.177.84 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Esowteric + Talk + Breadcrumbs 20:56, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:05, 30 April 2023 (UTC)