Jump to content

User talk:robertsky

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Tech News: 2025-04

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 January 2025

[edit]

Hi Robert. You closed this RM with the comment Per consensus, no primary, but there was no consensus of that kind. Two of us, including myself, supported the move, while another two opposed it. Only TiggerJay and I provided arguments for our positions. This means the support and opposition were even. I would appreciate it if you could amend your comment. Thank you, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 21:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Neveselbert will have a look again later tonight. – robertsky (talk) 04:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The image

[edit]

Hello, @Robertsky. About the photo inside the Killing of Wong Chik Yeok, I agree with your reasons that it might not fit the guidelines.[4] Personally I thought of taking down the photo, because it is directly linked to a bad case of personal attack and negative comments directed at me and some other wikieditors over the photos of murder victims and some other issues. The dust is settled for now with the guy being banned (it was inside the latest archives of ANI).[5] But I still have some concerns about the situation in the aftermath, and I thought it should be taken down not just because of your reasons behind nomination but likely I did not wish to be reminded of the terrible incident, which had been hanging over my head throughout the previous week. I understood some of the user's motivations regarding the photos but it is not what I agree with.

PS: I am slowly moving on from the incident. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 06:51, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @NelsonLee20042020 first off, there are times when every other active editors here will face a similar situation. I hope you can compartmentalize the situation and not let it affect you personally as much as possible and continue editing. With regard to the file deletion discussion, while I think there is scope for deletion within the policies here, I am unclear if it is as what the community thinks consensually, hence the discussion. I didn't want the earlier back and forth to detract a cordial discussion on the FfD space hence opening it only now rather than earlier. – robertsky (talk) 14:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Robertsky. I understand. Thanks by the way for the reply. Hard times ahead, but will try better in coping. NelsonLee20042020 (talk) 14:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN: Gloria Romero

[edit]

Hello, Robertsky! I'm asking if I can close my nomination? I'm not withdrawing my nom but I want to closed the nomination of ITN of Gloria Romero, I do respect their votes, however, their explanation on opposing are so confusing and nonsense. Some votes on the oppose are valid, but mostly they're just attacking (or probably attacking) my nomination just because it's not well known and "Not featured on CNN, BBC or AP News". Tho, I don't care their votes per WP:FUCKVOTES and WP:IGNORE, They're uncivil on my nomination feel like so racist on my nomination just because it's not "super" well known. I want to hear your reply, thanks! ROY is WAR Talk! 12:22, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Royiswariii short answer is nope. The discussions on ITN close early when there is no consensus to post. Just disengage and let the discussion takes its course. You have done what you can do, any further and you may be called out for bludgeoning the discussion. You are frustrated, yes, but you might want to strike off the racist slant though (here and at ITNC), as from another point of view, it is casting aspersions at the others who have taken part in the discussion. – robertsky (talk) 12:30, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I understand. I guess I'll turn off the notifications since I will not entrained on their comments. Thank you! :) ROY is WAR Talk! 12:32, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2025-05

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:12, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]