User talk:Ivanvector

SCAM WARNING! If you have been contacted or solicited by anyone asking for payment to get a draft into article space, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article, such offers are not legitimate and you should contact paid-en-wpwikipedia.org immediately. Please see this page for more information.

Welcome to my talk page!

If you are adding a new comment section, please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
If your comment is about an article, please consider adding the comment to the article's talk page, instead of adding it here. Wikipedia is a community effort, and other editors might have valuable opinions. You could add a comment here to let me know about your comment on the article's talk page. If I think your comment is about an article I may move it there and leave a note here saying I did so.
I absolutely hate conversations that thread across multiple pages. If you add a comment here, I will reply here. If I left a comment on your talk page and you reply here, I will move your reply back to your talk page. Please add this page to your watchlist to be informed when I reply.
Thanks for stopping by!

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Click here to email me. Emails sent through this form are private, however I may share their content privately with other users for administrative purposes. Please do not use {{ygm}} on this page: if you email me I will have already received an on-wiki notification.

Archives: Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20

This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Your draft article, Draft:Fanning Grammar School

Hello, Ivanvector. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Fanning Grammar School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bird's nest (hairstyle)

Hello, Ivanvector. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bird's nest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:24, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Ed student account blocked

Hello. I'm the instructor of Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Texas A M University/Technical and Professional Editing (Spring 2025) and one of my students, Mala1027, was apparently blocked today by you. When she showed me what was happening on her dashboard, we saw that she can't even edit in her own sandbox. I'm not sure if this is a shared IP issue, but I have 22 other students in this course, and we have been working on Wikipedia simultaneously so far without any issues. I wanted to check with you to see why she was blocked and how we can proceed from here to get her unblocked as soon as possible so she can complete her assignment. Thanks. Dr.ozkul (talk) 20:24, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dr.ozkul, thanks for your message. Mala1027's account is not blocked, but there is an underlying IP block on one of the networks that they have used, which was not set today but actually close to a year ago. That block is set to "anonymous only" which means it should not affect any user while they are logged into their account, but they might have logged out accidentally, or something else may have gone wrong. I have added the IP block exempt flag to Mala1027's account so that they should now not be affected by IP blocks at all as long as they are logged in. I'll also leave a message on their talk page.

I checked as much as I can to see if there might be another type of block affecting them, but I did not find anything. If you keep having problems please let me know, I will see what else I can do. Thanks again. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 01:25, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response. I just contacted Mala1027 and she is still having this issue. We are trying to sort this out and would appreciate your help. I have also contacted our assigned Wiki Education expert to get some help.

Since Mala1027 has no editing privileges right now, I will copy the block notification she's seeing for your reference: "The IP address or range 2600:387:0:0:0:0:0:0/40 has been blocked by Ivanvector for the following reason(s): Disruptive editing, squelch rapid sock creation, talk access revoked for misuse while blocked. Please see WP:ACC to request an account."

We double-checked and made sure Mala1027 is logged in. This error still pops up. I noticed the IP address in the notification is quite unusual, and I can't exactly pinpoint why it looks like that. Dr.ozkul (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr.ozkul and Mala1027: The IP address in the notification is a version 6 IP address, which is a newer standard from the IPv4 numeric notation that dates to the early days of the internet. The newer standard has been around for nearly 30 years but has only really been deployed widely on consumer equipment in the last 5-10 years maybe. That's not what the problem is here - something seems to have malfunctioned with the settings for this block, or possibly with Wikipedia's ability to accept edits from the IP range entirely. I have now removed the block, so if that was the problem then you should now be able to edit. But I am also getting an error when I try to load contributions for the IP range, which is very unusual and suggests a problem that's beyond my ability to fix. I'm going to open a bug report with our developers. Once again I'm very sorry this is happening; I'll update you as soon as I have more information. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:59, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector I think we're good for now. Mala1027 can edit right now. We'll keep you posted if we run into any issues again. Thank you very much for your time. Dr.ozkul (talk) 16:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Admin's Barnstar
		For putting an end to the garbage going on here. I have been specifically harassed by this user from multiple different IPs, so to see administrators standing up for me means a lot, especially given their direct attacks on my queer identity. I can not thank you enough for your help with this. JeffSpaceman (talk) 11:55, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weigela florida

Could you delete the redirect you created, Weigela florida? The general consensus at WP:PLANTS is that species should not be redirected to genera. I'm making stubs for that genus. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 16:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Abductive: strange that I would have created that redirect at all, this isn't a subject I'm all that competent in, and I almost always add redirect categories when I create redirects. But here we are. All I can say is that there is some content at Weigela that suggests that this is a type species, so that would make some sense as a redirect. I'm not quite sure what you're asking - if you're trying to create an article on the species you can just overwrite the redirect. If you have a draft you're trying to move there then I'll be happy to delete the redirect for you, but you should have a look at {{db-move}} for future use. Let me know. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:04, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I'll make a draft and see how it goes. Thanks, Abductive (reasoning) 19:50, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

BQ

I concede the 'electoral performance' table. But the survey-in-question, isn't about the top infobox. That being said, the result of having 'Quebec only seats' in the electoral performance table, will only encourage one or two editors to continue agitating for changing the top infobox. A mess that's being introduced, which will only create more problems, IMHO. GoodDay (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I agree, I was working on changing the infobox back but you beat me to it. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:44, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've opened a survey about the BQ's top infobox, at WP:CANADA. Best to settle once & for all, while the 2025 fed campaign is ongoing. GoodDay (talk) 20:22, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for review of protection version – Homeland Party article

Hello [[User:Ivanvector]],

I’m writing to respectfully request a review of the version protected in the recent full protection of the article [[Homeland Party (United Kingdom)]]. I believe the article was locked on a version that contains content and sourcing which may not comply with Wikipedia’s core content policies—including WP:NPOV, WP:V, WP:BLP, and WP:PREFER.

Specifically, the current version:

Locks in multiple recent edits that introduce contentious and defamatory labeling without sufficient attribution or balance.
Relies heavily on partisan activist sources such as Hope Not Hate, Searchlight, and Red Flare without balancing from academic or neutral outlets.
Appears to give undue weight to interpretations and accusations without verifying whether they are supported by the party’s own statements or official documents.

Per [[WP:PREFER]] and [[WP:Protection policy]], I respectfully ask that the page be temporarily reverted to the last stable version prior to the current dispute, or that editors be given a chance to reach consensus before locking in a potentially biased version.

I would welcome the input of an uninvolved admin or the opening of a formal discussion if needed.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

– ~~~~ Fileas Fogg (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to discuss these matters on the article's talk page, which will go much further towards establishing stable content for the article than any revert to a prior version will. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:44, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ivanvector, thank you for your response. I’ve started a section on the article’s talk page to raise policy-based concerns about the version currently under full protection: Talk:Homeland Party (United Kingdom)#Request to Reassess Protected Version Due to Policy Concerns. You're welcome to weigh in. Best regards, ~~~ Fileas Fogg (talk) 17:10, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

170.62.100.0/24

Don't partial block a VPN! That range is a Mullvad VPN and should be hard blocked. wizzito | say hello! 20:46, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wizzito, thanks for your message. My action here is a targeted block, I'm not allowed to say more here because of the checkuser policy. Our policy on proxies is that we routinely block open proxies, and Mullvad's VPNs are not open as far as I know. We do sometimes block closed proxies when they're being used abusively, but we always have to consider that blocking an IP range like this could also impact many other users who haven't done anything wrong, and sometimes the full block goes too far. I hope that helps. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 21:05, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]