Jump to content

User talk:Naraht

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Alpha Delta

[edit]

I saw your DAB improvements today, and added a missing item to the list of groups known as Alpha Delta. While adding the DAB page for ΑΔ to the Project Watchlist, I noted a fourth group named Alpha Delta, a SUNY regional sorority, that had devolved from that name into a group of locals called "Alpha Delta ____", where the blank was their chapter designation. This could become an interesting article, if either of us wish to pursue it. Noted at the SUNY Oswego chapter page, and probably elsewhere. The Brockport link they list is dead. Jax MN (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MN Feels similar to what happened with Delta Kappa.Naraht (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN The link from the adh page to the one at brockport is broken, but it exists in archive.org https://web.archive.org/web/20090727184045/http://www.brockport.edu/~library1/arch4c.htmNaraht (talk) 19:08, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
"clean up;, replaced: The Ohio State University → Ohio State Universitythank you. Drmies 15:50, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Naraht (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thank you for approving Indian sword. You are a really good asset for this website! 122.170.71.79 (talk) 09:30, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Welcomeen-zh/doc

[edit]

Template:Welcomeen-zh/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AFC Helper News

[edit]

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

  • AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
  • The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your help on a new draft

[edit]

Hello, I saw that you helped make some improvements to a new draft page I created, Draft:Jo Bamford. Would you have any more suggestions, or do you think it's ready to be reviewed again? Thanks for your time --Eatthecrow (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eatthecrow I think the only thing that I did was remove a nowiki tag. But quickly looking at it again, I have a few comments.
  1. The statement about the "A 2015 Reuters report"... doesn't seem to be relevant to this article, it appears to be about the grandfather, father and uncle.
  2. The "late 2021" entry seems a bit off. I'm not sure how the quote should be included. :(
  3. It may be tough to separate Jo from his family. Notability is not inherited, but I think he may be notable separately. It may also make sense (eventually) to have a hatnote make sure people aren't looking for his grandfather or vice versa.

You may want to ask the person who rejected it, you are pretty close.Naraht (talk) 23:48, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you taking the time to look at the article with those suggestions. I went and made some tweaks and added a hatnote to differentiate this article from his grandfather's. Synoman Barris reviewed and rejected the article - she's on a sabbatical away from Wikipedia for an undetermined amount of time, due to stress. I tried reaching out last month but haven't heard back. What do you think I should do in this case? Eatthecrow (talk) 18:30, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
EatthecrowSorry, missed your response. I'm willing to approve it, but right now the article exists in mainspace as a redirect to his father. I've marked the redirect for possible fast uncontroversial deletion. Whoever deletes it should either move it to mainspace *or* let me know so that I can do so. If it doesn't happen within 3 or 4 days, I'll look into doing a formal delete of the redirect which shouldn't be controversial. At absolute worst, it should be in mainspace by the end of the month. Naraht (talk) 14:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds great, I appreciate you helping me along with this process. Lmk if there's anything I can do. I don't have any experience with redirects..might be better if someone more experienced can do that part. Eatthecrow (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Eatthecrow Sorry, I missed that it had been deleted within 24 hours of the request. I've moved it to mainspace. Still needs categories and Wikiprojects on the talk page. Take a look at the equivalents for his relatives and see what makes sense. Often someone will come through when they see an article with no categories and do it.Naraht (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Contribution

[edit]

I'm conscious that varying an editor's comments, in even the slightest form, can be regarded as inappropriate, so am just indicating I varied the formating of your contribution at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feena Bonoan to make the flow of contributions more readible. Feel free to revert if not appropriate. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 22:52, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goldsztajn thank you for both fixing it and notifying me. In terms of opinion on the AFD, I think we are absolutely on the same page. I found the cow story as well.Naraht (talk) 23:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Britta Sjogren has been accepted

[edit]
Britta Sjogren, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 06:23, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

Hello! Just a heads up, you might want to sign your comment here. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:14, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to sign this post, too! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

[edit]
  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AFD for two Christian sororities

[edit]

Is something in the water? There is a flurry of AfDs this past week, all for religious themed fraternities and sororities. Today brought two more. Same OP -- I'd hate to think someone was gunning to delete these articles because of the groups' religious emphasis. Offered FYI. Jax MN (talk) 21:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:41, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"120-gram" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 120-gram and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#120-gram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 12:00, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For Delta Sigma Delta

[edit]

From Baird's 20th. p.V-76-77

  • Sigma Sigma — University of Washington — 1947
  • Alpha Alpha (second chapter with this name) — South Carolina — 1972
  • Alpha Gamma — University of Florida — 1975
"repeated from the 19th edition" Jax MN (talk) 20:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I missed Sigma Sigma and Alpha Alpha in the 1976 in trying to fill in the empties. the reissue of Alpha Alpha is interesting, as the Georgetown U Dental School didn't close until 1987. I'll take a peek at the 20th next time I go upstairs.Naraht (talk) 19:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I cross-checked the list you had posted so far. Your list has about a dozen additional chapters that never made it to Baird's 20th, and I found only these three missing from the other reference you cited. So in combination, this will likely provide us the complete list. The national website does not list chapters. Jax MN (talk) 20:46, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN The *legacy* version of the national website does. That's where I started from, see the first ref in the section.Naraht (talk) 21:05, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN I've got to step away for a while. I'm taking off the Under Construction, so if you want to keep linking the Dental Schools or transform it into a table, have fun. :)Naraht (talk) 21:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{U}Jax MN}} Pretty much done with gathering chapter data. Presumably this will end up as a page of its own and table-ized, just like Psi Omega and Xi Psi Phi. And then just to complete the four, I should do the same gathering for Alpha Omega. I think "Going Greek" might have a list.Naraht (talk) 21:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Naraht, I've finished the adjustment of the list into a table. I wrote to the group's Grand Scribe but haven't heard back. I have some doubts about the validity of 44 chapters being active, but the aging references we have still support this, as does the text of the organizations website. Also, I'm unclear whether these should be called undergrad chapters since dental school is a graduate program. Jax MN (talk) 18:39, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

[edit]
New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Naraht,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 809 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 845 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 May 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xyl 54/sandbox 12

[edit]

Hello Naraht
I notice you edited one of my sandboxes the other day; I was a bit puzzled by your comment, as the categories you altered were (I thought) already disabled. OTOH the last category (which appears to have been enabled by Primebot in February) wasn’t. Were they showing up somewhere, to draw your attention? My apologies, if so. Regards, Xyl 54 (talk) 23:47, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Xyl 54 Yes, that's basically it. "World War II destroyers of the United Kingdom" was showing up as a mainspace cat which made the sandbox show up in Wikipedia:Database reports/Polluted categories and the tool that I used replaces the [[Category: with [[:Category: for mainspace categories (I'm not quite sure of the exact strings that it looks for and replaces) but I don't think it knows that removing the ending brackets will remove it from other cats. Let me know if you want the name of the tool for more research. Happy editing.Naraht (talk) 12:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

[edit]
New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Naraht,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 14684 articles, as of 06:00, 20 December 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Responding to a failure to discuss

[edit]

USER IS DEMONSTRATING CLEAR AND MALIFICENT PATTERS OF OWNERSHIP TO ALL USERS. ADMINSTRATION INVESTIGATION RECOMMENDED. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PhiAlpha3000 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Response on talk page for article.PhiAlpha3000Naraht (talk) 19:06, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask to which article this discussion refers? Jax MN (talk) 19:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN List of Delta Kappa Epsilon chapters.Naraht (talk) 20:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I actually involved with this group. I really shouldn't be involved editing it. I have CONFLICT OF INTEREST PhiAlpha3000 (talk) 21:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate the remedies. Nothing against Gamma chapter the were a good chapter. The national director is a member. LSU made national news for pouring gasoline and urine on pledges. Their not coming back. PhiAlpha3000 (talk) 22:04, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nationals don't pla⁷ 72.227.115.125 (talk) 08:48, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Even in a situation like Theta Tau and Syracuse, Forever bans simply aren't. If Twenty five years from now, Delta Kappa Epsilon attempts to return, they'll be viewed equally to other groups that might come on campus.Naraht (talk) 12:28, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Naraht, did you finish your round of edits for the List of DKE chapters? I have a few cleanup items to attend to. Jax MN (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN I was looking for a few more chartering dates after move, but nothing large. I got rid of inuse.Naraht (talk) 15:56, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

[edit]
New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beta Sigma Lambda Exclusive Law Fraternity

[edit]

You have deleted our fraternity in the list of law fraternity in the Philippines, may ask why? Ar41985 (talk) 13:46, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ar41985 Absolutely. At one point the list of fraternities and sororities in the Philippines was a massive article including many groups that had either just come into existance and thus had no notability or were groups whose existance couldn't even be validated. So it was changed to say that a group would already have to have a wikipedia page about them (which of course could be challenged under normal procedures if no notability has been shown). A good comparison is with Sigma Rho. The page about Sigma Rho has references to article in the Rappler, Sunstar, Philstar and ABS-CBN.
So the next step is to see if there is enough for an article on Beta Sigma Lambda. Philstar appears to only mention Beta Sigma Lambda in an interview about the 2010 Bar Blast, and the 2003 Bar Examination Scandal. Nothing in Rappler or sunstar. ABS-CBN has two mentions from the 2010 bar blast. I realize that there are other news sources in the Philippines, but this was where I started. Wikipedia is interested in what other say about the group, not what the group says about themselves, so facebook groups created by the fraternity and similar things don't indicate notability. I even looked at Balita, and while I see mentions of Delta Sigma Lambda, they seem to be members writing in (at least by the automatic translation on google.) The resources showing notability don't have to be in English, so if there are better ones in Tagalog or Cebuano or one of the other languages of the Philippines that's fine.
And in terms of how I got interested, I'm a brother of Alpha Phi Omega of the United States, so I'm quite familiar with Alpha Phi Omega of the Philippines. The Oblation Run does sort of help with mentions in the news media. :) On the other hand, so does Ferdinand Tabtab.
Let me know how I can help. I will be happy to put you in touch with a different member of the Wikipedia project for Fraternities and Sororities if you think that my membership in Alpha Phi Omega represents a Conflict of Interest.Naraht (talk) 23:18, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://twitter.com/abscbnnews/status/1021932068190576642
https://abogado.com.ph/in-honor-in-death-beta-sigma-lambda-mourns-the-death-of-justice-ricardo-puno/
is this enough for you? Ar41985 (talk) 23:41, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ar41985 I'm not saying that I'm a gatekeeper here, and a more general appeal would be fine. However the twitter doesn't mention Beta Sigma Lambda, and the abogado mentions his membership. The second would be fine as a reference on a page about Beta Sigma Lambda showing that he was a brother, but doesn't necessarily show notability of Beta Sigma Lambda. As I said, I'd use Rho Sigma as a model. I'd suggest in the short term creating a page at Draft:Beta Sigma Lambda with the appropriate references, others will try to help, I'd suggest seeing what other references from places like newspapers are available. Naraht (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
So you will not stop deleting, I will not stop also publishing Ar41985 (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
we have all the rights to be on that list. Ar41985 (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ar41985, I work on fraternity articles, and have followed this conversation. You are taking this far too personally. WP is simply not a place for Original Research, that is, your own 'essay' type writing, without supporting valid references. Our advice is that you should dig for these. Find several publicly-available books, magazines, newspapers, or scholarly papers that talks about Beta Sigma Lambda. Cite these. If the group has existed for ten or more years with three or more chapters, that is more or less the bar for 'notability', but it must also have such citable references. Without these, it amounts to hearsay as in a court of law, and is inadmissible as evidence: a principle you might recognize. Jax MN (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bogged down

[edit]

Naraht, I got bogged down editing Kappa Sigma Kappa and Alpha Lambda Tau and had to walk away from it to let me eyes clear. Alpha Lambda Tau looks good, but I'd appreciate your review of both articles. As you might recall, I'd spent some time last year on the Trine University page, deciphering the many chapter name changes. Using that information, I attempted to clarify the Trine chapter's evolution within the scope of Kappa Sigma Kappa. I think I have it right, showing that it was the KSK group that found safe harbor in Kappa Sigma in 1966. It eventually took the Theta-Xi chapter of ΚΣ, in what appears to be a coincidence when you realize that its previous national, KSK had many chapters join Theta Xi national. Ugh. A later group formed a Teke chapter, but this came about from an alumnus that reformed KSK on that campus. Would you trace this, and see if it is as clear as can be stated, under the circumstances?

I think I should add a column, noting the names of the chapters after they merged, and the nationals they joined. More than any other national, Kappa Sigma Kappa, as a non NIC group, was simply picked dry of its good chapters by a number of nationals. The Baird's Archive record is rough, and many of the chapters are either duplicates (I've tried to clean these up) and it is missing numerous dates. Baird's normally uses footnotes to show where the chapters went, maybe showing two or four footnotes. But in the case of KSK there are perhaps 16 footnotes showing these outcomes. Like I said, KSK was picked dry. Jax MN (talk) 03:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MN working the Maryland election tomorrow, will try to take a look on Wednesday or Thursday.Naraht (talk) 03:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

[edit]
New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Naraht,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message

[edit]

Hi Naraht,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok to archive section?

[edit]

Can you confirm if I can archive this section? Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:47, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:33, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request: Draft:Merkur Stahlwaren

[edit]

Hello @Naraht, I have submitted an entry about the company Merkur. I saw that you are quite active in wikipedia and that you have already experience with reviewing drafts. So I wanted to ask you if you could maybe have a look at my article I handed in? I put a lot of effort into creating it and I would be really grateful. Here you can come to the draft: Draft:Merkur Stahlwaren.

Thanks again and many greetings,

Chris ChristianBarnes (talk) 10:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zeta Psi test

[edit]

Hello Naraht - I tested a format change on the Zeta Psi chapter list. An adjustment to how we show Inactive, Deceased chapters. Thoughts? Jax MN (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, what a mess we have in the Zeta Psi record. I commend you for working on it. When testing that grey highlight style I noted the situation with Harvard, where the earliest four-year period of activity ceased and Rho chapter there was termed as Deceased. Then, the group came back several times, still named Rho. The grey highlight works from what I recall reading about why the first group ceased. But looking at it again I saw (and recalled previously noting) the Middlebury chapter, also named Rho. Inactive, yes. Then supplanted by yet another run at it, by a Harvard group. I suppose it will all come down to whether or not the national fraternity applies the name Deceased on any of these more recent chapters, or not. Whatever they do, it appears to be a compromise solution to a bad naming problem they inherited. WTF were they thinking, in granting Middlebury that name? Hats off to you for wrestling with it. Jax MN (talk) 03:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN - Right now I'm just rearranging the order to the order in https://zetapsi.org/about/chapters/?fwp_paged=3 and then we'll see what's left that they *don't* include (like the Naval Academy). I'll take a look after the rest is rearranged.Naraht (talk) 14:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

[edit]

Hello Naraht,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

NPP backlog May – October 15, 2022

Suggestions:

  • There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
  • Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
  • Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
  • This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Artsakh political leader navigational boxes

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artsakh political leader navigational boxes indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff Arms Park

[edit]

You have previously edited Cardiff Arms Park. An editor has decided to split the article (yet again). I would like to know your view on the new edit....see Talk:Cardiff_Arms_Park#Article_Split_(again). SethWhales talk 20:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rodiyah Sapiee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malaysian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Naraht!

[edit]
Happy New Year!

Naraht,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 05:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 05:10, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

[edit]

Hello Naraht,

New Page Review queue December 2022
Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders
  • Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
  • There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
  • Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
  • If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
  • To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Can you move Draft:Council for Foreign and Defense Policy from draft to a normal article space?

[edit]

Hello Mr. Randolph Finder I found your name here:

Congratulations on being one of the anointed. 😀

Can you move this draft article out of draft? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Council_for_Foreign_and_Defense_Policy

Thank you in advance. Have a wonderful day. Metro2fsb (talk) 06:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Metro2fsb has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Because a person can never have too many cookies. 05:22, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

The Persian word "nārāhat" means "uncomfortable" in English

[edit]

oh. Metro2fsb (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your name sounds made up. LOL. Randolph Finder what do you find? I am sure that you get this comment a lot.
have a cookie ⬆️. Metro2fsb (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma Mu Delta

[edit]

I am pretty sure it is a lost battle to fight the deletion challenge of Sigma Mu Delta. Although your comment would be welcome, as always. I felt that I had met the initial challenge by finding sources, but the two extensions of the challenge appear to be a hunt for "delete" votes. I know you are much more experienced in these matters. Is it possible to win this type of challenge where the sources are campus and university oriented? In other areas of Wikipedia, I find that the deletion discussions look at the subject itself, as well as the sources--but this is the second time I have come across this type of debate with fraternities. My concern is the shear number of fraternal articles in Wikipedia that either lack independent sources or are similarly sourced. Should our focus shift to fixing those articles, rather than worrying about lists and mergers? Or are we really working on content that does not belong in Wikipedia? Maybe I am having a existential crisis as I pride myself in my ability to find sources. Rublamb (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JAX just found Simga Mu Delta in the almanac. We had both looked in coed, not all male. Don't know if that will make a difference, but at least it validates my gut that this group was notable. Rublamb (talk) 08:22, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1888 disestablishments in Maryland

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1888 disestablishments in Maryland indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:06, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liz After further research and expansion of Maryland Military and Naval Academy, it was determined that the school closed in 1887, not 1888. As such I will not be challenging the deletion. Thank you for marking it.Naraht (talk) 13:25, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 March 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:17, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 April 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:17, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 May 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:25, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

[edit]

I want to thank you for trying to make sure that my article gets through. I am so far unsuccesful in getting it done. If you could help me with the article I would greatly appreciate it. Also, do you have the Wikipedia authority to accept the article? Thanks! Petjayso (talk) 22:16, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 May 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drag Race España (season 3), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Wizard of Oz.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Causing Edit Conflicts

[edit]

Please do not edit drafts in my sandbox. You keep causing edit conflicts. Thanks. Rublamb (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 5 June 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:22, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Du Bouëxic family has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Du Bouëxic family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

[edit]

Hello Naraht,

New Page Review queue April to June 2023

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

The Signpost: 19 June 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:10, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aunt Flo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol needs your help!

[edit]
New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Naraht,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Omega Delta

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Naraht. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Omega Delta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Omega Delta

[edit]

Hello, Naraht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Omega Delta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:50, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent URL cleanup and params

[edit]

Hi Naraht. Some of the recent citations you have cleaned up have removed the parameter:
|website=web.archive.org
and I wonder if that suppresses Wikipedia from occasionally searching for dead links and replacing them with Wayback archives. Certainly, if a source goes bad, a Wayback archive is preferable to a dead link. Do I misunderstand here? Jax MN (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The other edits you have recently triggered using the Citationbot are clear to me, and helpful. Jax MN (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN I'm not honestly sure *when* web.archive.org is the proper website. Can you give me an example that isn't a Wayback link? If so, you can also bring it up on Citation bot's page.Naraht (talk) 00:08, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll look for one to bring as an example. Sadly, there have been so many pages updated today that I will have to sift for awhile. Jax MN (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MN I think Christian fraternities is an example, but it is correct as a wayback archive, the website=web.archive.org is incorrect.Naraht (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
For your magnificent work replacing subcategories of society lists! Rublamb (talk) 00:11, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Rublamb (talk) 00:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sigma Nu Phi

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sigma Nu Phi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Alpha Delta Pi chapters

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Alpha Delta Pi chapters, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Re: ADPi chapter list

[edit]

I'd suggest you use the earlier date for Alpha chapter, as they simply renamed themselves prior to beginning their national expansion and their first daughter chapter. This matches a number of other precedents. Jax MN (talk) 22:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bradford Gilbert‎

[edit]

I was excited to see that I editor I trust has looked at the Bradford Gilbert article. I have been working on this article on and off for a long time--it is one of the first articles I decided to improve. (Working on architects is how I ended up editing fraternity articles). It it pretty much ready for a GA nomination, although I have another huge scandal to add to the persona life section. But I need a second set of eyes on my table of projects. Tables are not used by the WP Archicture although I have introduced this format to many articles without any negative feedback. As a result, I did not have template to follow. These days, I stick to listing surviving buildings but Gilbert had so many important projects that are no longer survivng that I experimented with a status column. Does this make sense? Is it helpful to indicate things like museum, etc. or should I stick to surviving or demolished? Thanks! Rublamb (talk) 20:47, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb Sorry, all I did was look for situations where Kansas had the wrong post office abbreviation. That was just one of the pages... I'll look when I have chance.Naraht (talk) 23:43, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rublamb tweeked the table, found a few places where articles should add a link there. Consider making either Bradford L. Gilbert or Bradford Lee Gilbert redirects to the article.Naraht (talk) 02:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Ig Nobel Prize winners

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Ig Nobel Prize winners, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:53, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter

[edit]

Hello Naraht,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

[edit]

Hello Naraht:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1800 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A happy mortician kitten

[edit]

Thank you for your hard work! :D

Liza-shankar (talk) 00:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for removing all of the pesky mottos! Marquardtika (talk) 15:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marquardtika That's what AWB is for and I've been helping OpalYosutebito.Naraht (talk) 16:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blackguardly, I call it. Why were mottoes created? To inform people of some important intention or aspiration of a body. They are useful things to reference. Urselius (talk) 12:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blackguardly They weren't being displayed by the infobox, as such, the article displays completely the same without them.Naraht (talk) 13:47, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mottoes

[edit]

Wikipedia is incredibly stupid, stupid decisions are made by groups of people who do not consider all aspects of what they are debating. Then useful information is lost. Wikipedia process is despicable and not fit for purpose. Urselius (talk) 12:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas :)

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Naraht, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024.
Happy editing,
Jerium (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Jerium (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ref-breaking

[edit]

Obviously no objection to removing unsupported parameters, and with clear edit-summary about it! But [1] also removed a named-ref that was re-used elsewhere, leaving a visible error. Might want to double-check for "<ref name" in your AWB regexp. DMacks (talk) 04:43, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{U|DMacks}} fixed the article and I'll work on adding that.Naraht (talk) 04:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the quick fix (and the general AWB work!). DMacks (talk) 04:52, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Omega

Information icon Hello, Naraht. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Alpha Phi Omega, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{tl|edit COI}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see {{Section link|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI}});
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see {{Section link|Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming}});
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

APO category

[edit]

Per our discussion on the list talk page I have created Category:Alpha Phi Omega members and will be adding the articles from the list to it. Categories aren't subject to the same notability requirements as stand alone lists so the category will persist no matter what happens to the list, hopefully this offers much of the same utility as a navigational and organizational aid. TBH I was surprised to find out that the cat didn't exist already. COI aside you've worked really hard on that list and I would hate to see the utility removed from the project. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Eye's Back Not a determining Condition. Categories for membership in various GLOs have been created in the past and deleted as not a determining condition. I will be proposing that list for deletion.Naraht (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If thats true you can just prod it, I have no objection. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure though? I see lots of similar cats, Category:Members of the Black Panther Party for example. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a GLO.Naraht (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is the difference between a GLO and a political party in terms of being a determining condition? Both are social groups. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have Category:Freemasons so we seems to allow fraternal orgs. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
List of Alpha Phi Alpha members also lacks anything which indicates notability... And its not a real FA, look at the history... Its a 2007 FA which would not survive a challenge, not going to challenge because people keep saying I'm battle grounding. Goodnight! Rest assured that I will not be nominating List of Alpha Phi Omega members for deletion anytime soon, take all the time you need to find sources. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Francis University

[edit]

My intention is BOTH Saint Francis University (Pennsylvania) and Saint Francis University (Hong Kong) will get disambiguation term, while Saint Francis University would redirect to University of Saint Francis (which itself is a disambiguation page). --Leeyc0 (Talk) 03:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leeyc0 Please point a place where X University and University of X have a joint Disambiguation page. SFU Pennsylvania is primary over SFU Hong Kong (about 400 links to about 100 links and that's the more favorable way to look at it as Google searches on the two are *far* more imbalanced.Naraht (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest to raise this issue to community and let the community decide. I don't think we can make this judgement privately. I am open to both options. --Leeyc0 (Talk) 13:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just raised your concern in Template_talk:College#Template-protected_edit_request_on_10_January_2024. This looks like to be the best place for this issue. --Leeyc0 (Talk) 13:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leeyc0 This being my talk page or Template:College?Naraht (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the talk page of Template:College --Leeyc0 (Talk) 15:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pi Alpha Tau

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pi Alpha Tau, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Northwestern College (Iowa)

[edit]

I noticed that in the right stats sidebar, you changed "Staff" to "Total staff." We typically talk about "faculty" (i.e., those who teach, or professors and instructors) and "staff (i.e., those working in non-teaching roles--from the president to an administrative assistant or maintenance worker). With "Academic staff" and "Total staff," could it seem as if "Total staff" includes "Academic staff"? (It doesn't. We have 84 full-time faculty and 140 full-time non-faculty, or administrators and staff.) Our total full-time employees comes to 224 people. Is there a way to make that clear? Thank you in advance for your help! Skielark (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skielark Please take a look at the documentation on Template:Infobox University, It sounds like what you want is academic_staff=84 and administrative_staff = 140. Does that help?Naraht (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it does! Thank you for your help! Skielark (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LI-importance & Syracuse-importance

[edit]

Would you care to elaborate @ Template talk:WikiProject New York (state)#LI-importance & Syracuse-importance, at least so there's a record?   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tom.Reding Good enough?Naraht (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

[edit]

Hello Naraht,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines)

[edit]

I think List of Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines) chapters and alumni associations should be split into two articles, based on its length. Maybe also move the citations to their own column. Thoughts? Rublamb (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb Sounds good. I need to go diving through facebook to find the dates for the last 5 years or so. Official facebook feed of APO Phil should be OK as a ref.Naraht (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eta Upsilon Gamma has been accepted

[edit]
Eta Upsilon Gamma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MALIK (fraternity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with founded incomplete

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with founded incomplete indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Epsilon Nu Tau

[edit]
Notice

The article Epsilon Nu Tau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking sufficient secondary sources to meet WP:ORGCRIT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Epsilon Nu Tau

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Epsilon Nu Tau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epsilon Nu Tau for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epsilon Nu Tau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon Nu Tau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished, or remove comments from the discussion.

AusLondonder (talk) 12:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox change, recent updates

[edit]

Nice catch, adding Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with missing website. Always a vexing issue.

Might I ask that you confirm whether Sigma Xi now should have a category, like the other Honor Society Caucus fraternities? Since I created the chapter list, I think it is probably appropriate, but defer to you as our resident category expert. Please create it, if fitting. Jax MN (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MNRight now, there are only two pages. I'm hesitant since this is a category that has been deleted before. When we get three, no question.Naraht (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At some point, one of us may add a Notables article. We can revisit it then. No problem. Jax MN (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MNQuite likely!Naraht (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Munich

[edit]

Re: Corps Palatia Munich, and my addition of (Munich) in the infobox.

Hi Naraht. Obviously that is the English translation of the German city name now shown as Corps Palatia München in the infobox. As this is the English Wikipedia, I offered this parenthetical clarification for those unfamiliar with the German language. You don't think it useful? Jax MN (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Theta Phi Alpha

[edit]

Why are you reverting my edits to this page? The revisions are needed to reflect what's happening with the National organization. I'm on the Grand Council. Thank you. Katie Evans 2600:4041:6683:1C00:D519:CEC:2999:E6D7 (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to respond over at the talk page for the article about Theta Phi Alpha, for more audience. No way to directly alert someone who edits without an account but hope to continue there.Naraht (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISBN

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you offered Salpynx to help clear ISBN errors: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salpynx&diff=prev&oldid=1204790683

It's a been a while since I used AWB (I once had a registered account, but abandoned it after some interpersonal issues drove me away) but I think that the easiest task would be to replace every instance of <nowiki>ISBN 9999999999999</nowiki> with {{ISBN|{{Format ISBN|9999999999999|out=13}}}}, where the input string and list of articles are copied from https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia/ISBN_errors. Using {{Format ISBN}} would mean there is no need to preprocess the input string. The 9999999999999 could be left as is.

I've been working through many of these issues manually, concentrating on the errors that appear to be unique and on articles with more than a couple of errors. I don't think I'll ever get to the articles that have just one error. Any help would be greatly appreciated! 76.14.122.5 (talk) 02:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delta Phi Delta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweet Pea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Kumar Mehta AfD round 2

[edit]

Hi there, as a previous participant in an AfD for Arun Kumar Mehta that was closed as "soft delete," I am notifying you that the article has been refunded and is now up for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Kumar Mehta (2nd nomination). Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Interesting discussion, one that gets to the heart of our use of crests, badges and the like. I recently was alerted of a potential copyright or licensing violation which appeared to me to be incorrect, so I brought the issue up for dispute. See Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Member_badge. Once this is resolved we should capture the discussion in our Project archive.
Jax MN (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the proxying issue re JH

[edit]

Courtesy link: this user talk discussion

Hi, Naraht. responding to this comment of yours at JH's TP: Imho, it is not so much a question of whether it involves reverting your own edit or not (although that would likely be viewed as a smaller infraction than reverting someone else's, *if* proxying were involved), but rather at whose behest you are doing the revert. If you decided to revert yourself for reasons entirely your own, then it is not proxying; and if you are influenced to do so by a discussion from a blocked user, then it might be proxying. Even in the latter case, if you take full ownership of it and independently believe it is the right course of action, then you could make the revert, but that is a gray area. That is my interpretation of WP:PROXYING, but others might see it differently. I think a self-revert of the type you dsecribed is probably okay; but if you have any doubts about it, you could simply ask a trusted admin about it on their Talk page, or here on your Talk page either by pinging an individual admin, or using template {{Admin help}}. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot Thank you. I think the edit in question is the one on The Daily Campus and that isn't mine, it is by Liz and I personally think that as an actual street address, it should either be Storrs-Mansfield, or Storrs as I don't think Storrs, Mansfield, Connecticut is one of the choices by the US Postal Service (and specifically as a *street address*, I *think* USPS trumps WP:COMMONNAME, but I'd like to be sure, get other opinions). And in regards to the ANI comment, I not only have half of the pages I changed on my watchlists, I'm running a search on insource:/Storrs-Mansfield/ whenever I get on Wikipedia. Oddly, I may have been the first one to object to the changes because they kept coming up in all of the Fraternity and Sorority chapter lists where UConn has a chapter. (I'm on WP:FRAT) and because I didn't indicate it elsewhere, Thank you to Liz as well.Naraht (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I got pinged to Talk:Storrs, Connecticut § Storrs-Mansfield Discussion by the Rfc bot, and probably won't get into the content dispute regarding the name more than I already have as I don't really care that much, so will probably leave it to others. (I might get involved if proper interpretation of ngrams or other search result data becomes an issue, because casual users of search tools so often get it wrong.) The Talk page is the right place to resolve that, and obviously there have been recent attempts to do so, which have had to deal with the bludgeoning and other issues that left JH temp blocked.
There is certainly no rush as far as resolving this question, and imho it would be a good idea to put off any further attempts to change things at that article for a little while, if only because of the likelihood of a repeat of past strife and wasting our most precious resource (editor time). Once the dust has settled one way or another, a discussion (or possibly an Rfc) down the road might resolve the question among editors dealing with the question collegially and disinterestedly, but I don't think we are there yet on this issue. I think the most efficient path (least use of multiple editors' time) would be to wait a few months, and then try. Just my two cents. Mathglot (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mathglot probably. I don't know if there is any formal way to say "let's put a discussion on ice for a few months", but I can support.Naraht (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is an informal way to do so, which is just to propose and get consensus for a moratorium. Sometimes in perennial Rfc questions which keep coming up over and over, someone puts forward a proposal (either while the Rfc is going on or right after) that there should be no further Rfc's on the same topic for <time interval>, which I've seen be up to 18 months for particuarly egregious cases. With such a consensus, premature attempts to raise it again can be hatted, with |result=Moratorium in effect; see <link>.
But here, a much easier response is just silence. After someone proposes a change that is reverted and discussed, if they are unable to gain consensus on the Talk page after a reasonable amount of discussion, there is no requirement for the majority in opposition to respond to every one of their questions or ripostes. You can simply let them have the last word, and keep on talking and talking as much as they want, with no response at all. Their having the last word does not equal consensus, and after hearing nothing back for a while, they usually give up. If they don't, and barge ahead unilaterally, reinserting the oppositional material again, one of the majority simply reverts, with edit summary: "No consensus; see Talk", or "Contrary to previous consensus; see Talk", and if they do it again, a different majority editor should revert and then take them to the Edit warring noticeboard. That should be the end of it.
I would just choose silence at this point, although I fear, as you do, that it will spring up again. If it does, I would respond with one brief sentence in the discussion just like those suggested edit summaries, and then never respond again (unless some completely new argument is supplied which seems unlikely, and even then, they would need consensus). It's fine if they get the last word and then it just fizzles out; that saves you from having to respond. Mathglot (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2009 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2010 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2011 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Apologies, but since you were somewhat involved with UConnIPUser you should be notified. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshi24517 I was away from Wikipedia for 12(?) hours and it went from my original reversion of the UConnIPUser change to redirect to the ban hammer being dropped. In some ways I'm sorry I missed it. Feel free to invite me to any other Storrs Connecticut related ugliness :).Naraht (talk) 13:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Naraht&oldid=1263683850"