User talk:Bri

Home Barnstars, Badges, & User Boxes Talk to me Creations Category:Writers from Pasco, Washington has been nominated for merging Category:Writers from Pasco, Washington has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Lost in Quebec (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC) deleted On your creations page, it says that an article was deleted. It is currently blue-linked. Is that your article? Alexeyperlov 17:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC) If you're referring to Yanet García, it looks like it was re-created by another editor. To confirm, open this link and scroll down to line 559. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC) Nomination of The Editors (novel) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Editors (novel) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Editors (novel) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:38, 28 November 2024 (UTC) Concern regarding Draft:Home grow Hello, Bri. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Home grow, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace. If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Category:Set designers has been nominated for merging Category:Set designers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Axem Titanium (talk) 06:59, 3 December 2024 (UTC) Thanks Manual publishing is always a pain in the ass -- thank you for getting it out. jp×g🗯️ 10:14, 13 December 2024 (UTC) JPxG Yes, it's a dreary copy-paste fest! Here's hoping whatever's wrong with the script is simple to correct. ☆ Bri (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC) Seasons Greetings! File:Statues of Three Wise Men in the Philippines 06.jpg Hello there, 'tis the season again, believe it or not, the years pass so quickly now! A big thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipedia in 2024! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2025! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC) New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here. You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC) Seattle Wikipedia Day, January 11, 2025 Seattle Wikipedia Day Saturday afternoon, January 11, from 1:00–4:30pm PT at the Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Branch Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102) Wikipedia Day celebrates the anniversary of the founding of Wikipedia. This year we will observe Wikipedia Day with an edit-a-thon to improve the Seattle and other articles important to WikiProject Seattle, such as History of Seattle, Puget Sound, Lake Union, Lake Washington, Pioneer Square, Seattle Center, Tacoma, and University of Washington. →Sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle/Wikipedia Day 2025!← You can also read and add to the task list. Please remember to check our Seattle meetup schedule each month for upcoming events. 06:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. Good article reassessment for Honda Super Cub Honda Super Cub has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC) Your thread has been archived Hello Bri! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Seeking wisdom: streamlining navboxes, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:06, 1 February 2025 (UTC) CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 February 5 § Category:Eponymous categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:16, 5 February 2025 (UTC) PRODs Hello, Bri, For some recently tagged articles, you somehow merged BLPPROD tags with PROD tags. These are two very different forms of deletion and the current merger is confusing for a reviewer to assess. It would have been simpler if they had all just been regular PROD taggings. And, for example, the tags don't include the username of the tagger as is typical. So I'm going to leave them for another admin to try to sort out. If, in the future, you could just choose one form of PROD, either an BLPPROD tag or a regular PROD tag, it would be much more straight-forward for the admin who needs to evaluate them. Just use Twinkle to select one form of PROD instead of creating original forms of tagging. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:18, 7 February 2025 (UTC) @Liz: Sorry for the trouble. I don't use Twinkle, I just place the templates by hand and manually log at User:Bri/PROD. Thought that it was a good idea to use BLPPROD where it seems justified. I.e. applying BLPPROD only where no references exist, per the documentation. Some BLPs don't satisfy this requirement, so I use PROD instead. Based on your description above of "merged" I'm not sure what is wrong; if you could provide a diff maybe I would understand better. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:58, 7 February 2025 (UTC) CS1 error on 2025 in Washington (state) Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2025 in Washington (state), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help) Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:08, 25 February 2025 (UTC) MOS:NONSOVEREIGN and MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE Per MOS:NONSOVEREIGN and MOS:FLAG RELEVANCE, requesting relevant use of Puerto Rico’s flag in a sporting or beauty contest where the American territory competes separately & independently (sovereign) from USA since 1948. MOS:NONSOVEREIGN supports the use of sub-national flags as “exception[s] in sporting contexts“, which would naturally extend to beauty pageants. MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE approves use of sub-national flags when it is “directly relevant to the article”, which applies here considering that in the beauty competition the candidate of “Puerto Rico” represents “Puerto Rico”, wears the band of “Puerto Rico”, and performs in front of the projected “flag of Puerto Rico”. This further satisfies MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE, as it has made the flag easily “recognizable by the general public” throughout the history of major international beauty contests in which Puerto Rico has continuously participated since 1952 with great success. The candidate from Puerto Rico does not carry the name nor the flag of the USA during the competition, as that is the responsibility of the candidate in the competition directly representing the “USA” or the “United States of America”. Like in the Olympics, the USA and PR athletes/candidates are considered separate and independent from each other, which is why the USA team wears and performs under the American flag and the Puerto Rico team wears and performs under the Puerto Rican flag. Tektonson (talk) 22:09, 7 March 2025 (UTC) @Tektonson: I think this should be discussed at the MOS talkpage. I initiated a discussion there in 2022, where I felt there was either support for no flags in pageant articles, or adherence to NONSOVEREIGN, my interpretation of which is PR is not sovereign and would be covered by the US flag. Would you like to start it? ☆ Bri (talk) 22:13, 7 March 2025 (UTC) The case is clear to me, but a discussion would help! The case is clear to me, but absolutely, there should be a discussion because it is profoundly misleading and confusing to have a separate and independent candidate in a beauty pageant registered as “Puerto Rico” representing “Puerto Rico” with the “flag of Puerto Rico”, and not reflect that on the wiki page of the pageant. She is not representing the “USA” with the “flag of USA”, as that duty falls on the separate and independent candidate registered as “USA” in the pageant. Tektonson (talk) 22:33, 7 March 2025 (UTC) I am a little confused. you removed the discussion that you started. do you intend to reopen it at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons? ☆ Bri (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Yes! Yes, will be adding shortly. Thanks Tektonson (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Invitation to participate in research Hello, The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)