User talk:Seasider53

This is Seasider53's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

River Arts District

Thanks. I was afraid of running into the paywall and I had difficulty telling which article was which on the web site. I think ProQuest may have different wording becaise the web site articles are always getting updated.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 23:06, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of External Links

Hello, I would like to understand why you considered the reference to two of the most important websites related to John Muir was considered "spam." As I explained in the rationale for adding these sites as External Links for the entry on John Muir, the omission of a link to John Muir Exhibit website seems to be a major oversight, as that site is considered by numerous scholars the largest repository of writings about John Muir, cited by dozens of published books, and even seen by the University of the Pacific John Muir Papers (which is included) as an important resources. Similarly, the link to the John Muir Global Network, a portal to websites featuring Muir around the world, seems too important to omit, given that Wikipedia is intended to incorporate more than just "original" sources but to cite to "what others are saying about the topic" at hand, in this case John Muir. These are not just some random sites, but rather sites that have been devoted the the topic for many decades, and frequently referenced in scholarly articles. Thanks. Muirpower (talk) 23:43, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hadlock Field. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. User:Namiba 19:08, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review your Edit

you should review your last edit in the Kabaddi page. proper citation included. Tamil Selvan34 (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I share the same concerns regarding the quality (and apparent activism) behind this user’s edits. I am similarly concerned with this user’s consistent disregard for citing source materials. This user appear to be a non-native speaker of English, with more enthusiasm than their intelligence can extend to. 75.161.56.205 (talk) 20:41, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reported them, but there was a backlog that day, so the request was deleted by a bot. Will report again if needed. Seasider53 (talk) 20:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Northern Premier Cricket League logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Northern Premier Cricket League logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Preston and Wyre Joint Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]