Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive/2020/03
- 2020
This page is an archive of past discussions from Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to request page protection, please do so at WP:RFPP.
01 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism and BLP violation for the last few days. Tayi Arajakate Talk 05:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent BLP violations, vandalism and disruptive editing. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 06:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism resumed immediately after protection expired. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 09:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing (South Korea vs Korea, China vs Mainland China etc.) by IP edits (possible same user), popular theme.Jklamo (talk) 02:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:28, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protection: IPs continually add the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak as a current pandemic. The World Health Organization has yet to officially declare it as such. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 18:31, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit rate is a bit high for PC -- ferret (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Low column but persistent vandalism since 24 Feb, 2020. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 21:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seeking extended confirmed protection for this page. Extensive amount of vandalism from multiple IP editors, likely due to its basic subject matter and attention. Vandalism is persistent over a long period of time and the factors for it are unlikely to change, so seeking indefinite protection. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Edit rate is low enough for PC. Definitely not worth ECP, and there's not enough protection history to warrant indef Semi. -- ferret (talk) 22:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Speculative additions on parent album keep getting inserted without confirmation. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping users back again attempting to add that a contestant who withdrew due to injury was disqualified. (Somehow five years later #Bingate lives on…). YorkshireLad (talk) 00:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Edit rate is low but consistent enough that PC should work. -- ferret (talk) 22:30, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Single Vandal but seems determined to make a point in this particular article. Slywriter (talk) 04:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please. It's an IP hopper and I'm involved. Doug Weller talk 18:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 19:53, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism has returned, changing occupation to "hero" and using edit summaries such as "fixed typo". . Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 22:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly created by blocked ,banned users. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Nosebagbear. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps insisting on deleting text that has stood for some time and hasn't become involved in ongoing discussion on what to do, where leaving text in place should make it easier for editors to review it. Dhtwiki (talk) 22:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: 121.88.165.241 (talk · contribs) blocked by Primefac. Partial block since they've initiated the talk page discussion and it would be beneficial for them to continue on it. Primefac (talk) 13:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Gnslps (talk) 13:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Wrong project – please request this wherever it actually happened, but not on the English Wikipedia ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Gnslps, I have moved your report to el:Βικιπαίδεια:Σημειωματάριο_διαχειριστών#Α.Ο._Ξάνθη_/_79.130.62.244_reported_by_Gnslps. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- ToBeFree Thank you for the correction,I'm relatively new userGnslps (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- No worries, Gnslps. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP/new editor vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Kosack (talk) 17:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Created and deleted three times since October 2019. Hog Farm (talk) 00:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Nosebagbear (talk) 02:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism edits right now by multiple IPs. HaeB (talk) 06:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 14:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-Protection: Problematic IP vandalism - Need temporary protection to discourage the behaviour, with a reasonable length of time to achieve this. GUtt01 (talk) 10:17, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two IPs in the last month, and one has been blocked. Primefac (talk) 13:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:14, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I don't know if I would call this persistent vandalism, as the changes aren't blatantly problematic. It should have been discussed on the talk page, which I see the IP has started . Primefac (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP and newish user blanking sourced content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Arbitration enforcement. 舞月書生👉☎️👈∮Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian. 08:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh i was wrong, i want to semi-protection it. The entry has undergone an editorial battle and a suspected rampant account.--舞月書生👉☎️👈∮Active at zh.wikipedia, strive to be a good Wikipedian. 09:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I came here to request semi-protection for this page. I have no idea what's going on, but there are a bunch of IPs and new accounts edit warring with each other. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Also came to request semi-protection; looks like it was triggered by China banning access to AO3 yesterday. Edit war still going on. YorkshireLad (talk) 12:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I came here to request semi-protection for this page. I have no idea what's going on, but there are a bunch of IPs and new accounts edit warring with each other. SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Changed to Temporary semi-protection: Vandalism --KumaTea 来喝茶! 12:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Primefac (talk) 12:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous vandalism/WP:DE. Magitroopa (talk) 18:11, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Declined looks like a single recent vandalising IP, who has now been blocked Nosebagbear (talk) 02:14, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP introducing links to non-reliable sources, obvious axe to grind. Mr. Vernon (talk) 00:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:12, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Cullen328. - the bot will tag it as protected shortly enough Nosebagbear (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I have been getting death threats on my talk and emails lately, fueled by Social media campaign. So a semi of my User talk and User page is merited to discourage sockpuppetry. My Userpage was vandalized yesterday. (see AN thread for context) I believe he is one of the many socks of Biman1989 (blocked by User:Bbb23) as the language of the comment is same as its socks and harassment emails I have been getting lately. Also I will be glad if an admin removes User:Takijeg398 's death threats from my talk page. (fyi User:El C. ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 06:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
02 March 2020
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. ~ Matthewrbowker Comments · Changes 19:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 19:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Roaming IP editor keeps adding unsourced content to the "Cast" section. They are also removing red links in violation of WP:REDLINK despite the figures having the absolute potential for their own articles, likely removing it because they think red links look bad. Emphasis on "roaming", since a previous request only resulted in the specific IP address being blocked. There are now four distinct IP addresses for the editor engaging in this behavior, making talk-page warnings useless (and dubious that they are the kind to engage in discussion). Pinging NJA who blocked one of the IPs previously as seen here. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 19:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Doesn't look like any good faith IP editors likely to be impacted and this is across at least 5 very different IPv6 ranges so far. -- ferret (talk) 19:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Steven (Editor) (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 20:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page needs longer protection. It's a real target for IP vandals. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Long history of multiple protections. -- ferret (talk) 16:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article vandalized by Maldivian IP-hopper since November. Khruner (talk) 17:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 5 reverts in as many months. Before that, 5+ years with no reverts. This is too infrequent for semiprot but PC should do. -- ferret (talk) 17:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Repeatedly recreated and deleted, has been WP:SALTed in the past and was created again after lapse of protection. Hog Farm (talk) 17:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Confirmed cases in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi-protection is used on Coronavirus disease 2019 and this template is used on that page to report confirmed cases and deaths that have already been vandalised. Please assist. TIA! comrade waddie96 (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 13:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 13:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)- @NJA: Please see Template:Deaths in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak which was protected (both were reported at the same time). I assume the same vandalism will occur with this template. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. As of now it is a bit pre-emptive, which is not what we normally do unless it’s a high risk template. I can accept an argument that it is, so to save trouble I will semi protect for 3 months, N.J.A. | talk 13:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @NJA: Please see Template:Deaths in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak which was protected (both were reported at the same time). I assume the same vandalism will occur with this template. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection Some IPs are edit warring each other and also the regulars are confusing their edits for vandalism. NavjotSR (talk) 12:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. seems contained mostly for now, keep engaging in dispute resolution or report any edit warring at WP:ANEW N.J.A. | talk 13:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Declined I don't think protection is warranted here right now. Where's the talk page discussions? Slow moving and protection would only impact good faith IP editor. -- ferret (talk) 13:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Roaming IP editor keeps adding unsourced content to the "Cast" section. They are also removing red links in violation of WP:REDLINK despite the figures having the absolute potential for their own articles, likely removing it because they think red links look bad. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 12:48, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. if that doesn’t help re-report here or to me for re-consideration, N.J.A. | talk 13:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – The page seems to be a target for edit warring, and many edits are contested from the revision history. Thepenguin9 (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. One IPv6 /64 range involved that I could see. Blocked for 1 week. -- ferret (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP has been continuously adding unsourced content and pushing his POV without any reliable sources. I have warned him several times on multiple IPs but still the situation remains the same. Mr.Sarcastic (talk) 15:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Latest target of the tech support scam bots, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Heads up: addition of potentially malicious material to computer security article. If past targets are any indication (for example Ransomware), this will go on for quite a while from different IPs. MrOllie (talk) 15:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Too much VANDALISM . ~Nick~{talk} 15:31, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lot of poorly cited crypto content added repeatedly. . Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note WP:GS/Crypto in place. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 16:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note WP:GS/Crypto in place. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Lots of POV-pushing going on here. InvalidOStalk 16:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 16:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Dispute over whether Grenell still formally holds the position of U.S. ambassador to Germany. 1990'sguy (talk) 13:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 15:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – The third account this user has created with what I believe is the express purpose of vandalising this page with Neo-Nazi-related content. This is following months of the same vandalism under IPs. Such persistence shows that this is not gonna stop unless we commit to tougher protection. Alivardi (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Three IP:s from the same general area have been removing/moving images without ES:s or responding at the talkpages. Please try a few days protection. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 14:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps find-and-replacing Kiev with Kyiv against consensus (and it also breaks all the image and category names). Le Deluge (talk) 11:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, please warn the IP, and if they continue please ping me, I will block them--Ymblanter (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – from IP and new users. And this is a hot topic. I am requesting for indefinite page protection. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: So that I can still edit it, now that I am no longer an admin. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:26, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: QEDK (seems to be offline) has said that any admin can revert the protection, Please unprotect the article talk page. People should be able to post suggestion. some amount of talk page Vandalism and BLP Vios can be removed easily. Blocking the talk simply floods the OTRS and shifts to other user pages. We should keep the page related comments at one place. Talk page. . ⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 12:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:22, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Protection removed by El C--⋙–DBigXrayᗙ 12:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Unprotected (for the bot). For details, see the protecting admin's talk page. El_C 14:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Things going a little crazy here since this British comedian legally changed his name to Hugo Boss. Also recomend protection against page moves in the short term too. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 12:02, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., was already moved protected indefinitely, N.J.A. | talk 13:32, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IP vandals over the last few days. Johand199 (Talk • Contribs) 12:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., also users blocked by another admin, N.J.A. | talk 13:41, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes. ~Nick~{talk} 02:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @El C: applied the indefinite Semi-Protection, so we need their input here. However, given that this outbreak is ongoing, it seems like a good idea to make it PC1 to prevent collateral damage by denying IPs who could add important information. — Maile (talk) 02:36, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm not at all convinced that protection needs to be downgraded from semi to pc1. El_C 02:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Maile66: I did not apply an indefinite duration — the protection is set to expire on 19 April 2020. El_C 02:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, pardon me. It's the page move that is indef protected. — Maile (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- No worries, Maile66 — I do that all the time, too. El_C 03:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, pardon me. It's the page move that is indef protected. — Maile (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Maile66: I did not apply an indefinite duration — the protection is set to expire on 19 April 2020. El_C 02:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done as this will increase work all round for everyone and prevent rapid updates. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 01:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. El_C 10:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent unsourced/unreliably sourced edits + PoV statements being used to attack the University - Arjayay (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ferret (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 10:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Bobherry Talk Edits 02:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Please also invoke WP:ARBDS. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:24, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The page seems to undergo many edits to change the infobox from English to Japanese. Indefinite semi-protection would probably be the best considering these edits come from IP's. Thepenguin9 (talk) 10:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary semi-protection is used on Coronavirus disease 2019 and this template is used on that page to report confirmed cases and deaths that have already been vandalised. Please assist. TIA! comrade waddie96 (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Template protection: High-risk template – Match protection level with Template:Intro to. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template protected indefinitely. El_C 10:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Match protection level with Template:UAAPteam. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:57, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Amaury • 20:43, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP adding false information. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IPs continuously vandalize very heavily by removing Martina Stoessel's birth name. 2001:569:74D2:A800:3419:62E0:9FDD:1EA3 (talk) 01:04, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DB Dilan Brechero. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 10:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Rapidly changing IPs or tag-teaming unsourced additions causing ridiculous number of pending changes rejections. Toddst1 (talk) 01:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Spencer. El_C 10:11, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent uptick in problematic edits (introducing factual inaccuracies, deleting sourced content, breaking sentence format, etc.) by SPA IPs in the last several days (3 in the last 24 hours). The page is currently the subject of an ongoing RfC (with multiple spin-off threads), and some stability in the article content would be helpful until the end of the RfC. -- Black Falcon (talk) 02:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Based on this edit, there appears to be an off-wiki push to force one of the options being discussed at the RfC. -- Black Falcon (talk) 04:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 03:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:08, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP users continue to edit the article disruptively (e.g. replacing "failures" with "successful(l)", adding copyrighted content, etc.). Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 06:27, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – This page has been protected in the past. ~Nick~{talk} 06:05, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Why not Template Editor Protected even as extend confirmed disruptive editing still happened. 07:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I believe template protection is only for technical templates. This template does not require special knowledge or coding skills so it doesn’t apply. Disruptive editing was still happening under extend confirmed protection but it was greatly minimized. The situation right now is getting out of hand. Hayman30 (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Disagree in my opinion, this template needs a special knowledge or coding skills. So the Template editor protected needs apply to this template whether it is distruptive editing, minimal pr not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.68.194.161 (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is simply not true. Updating numbers doesn't require special skills or knowledge. Most of the disruptive editing is just people not providing a reliable source when updating, this issue can be greatly mitigated with extended confirmed protection. Hayman30 (talk) 09:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Disagree in my opinion, this template needs a special knowledge or coding skills. So the Template editor protected needs apply to this template whether it is distruptive editing, minimal pr not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.68.194.161 (talk) 09:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- I believe template protection is only for technical templates. This template does not require special knowledge or coding skills so it doesn’t apply. Disruptive editing was still happening under extend confirmed protection but it was greatly minimized. The situation right now is getting out of hand. Hayman30 (talk) 08:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: This page was previously extended confirmed protected util it expired at 04:57 on 1 March 2020 (log). Hayman30 (talk) 09:56, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I had to follow 3-4 page moves to get back to the original protection log at Template:2019-20 Wuhan coronavirus data/World. -- ferret (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Trying another month. -- ferret (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SCP-2000 06:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus outbreak data/South Korea medical cases (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. IP user persistently undoes edits without attempting to talk. Rethliopuks (talk) 06:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Llywrch. El_C 10:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by two IP's, one of whom is currently vandalising other pages. Thepenguin9 (talk) 10:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 10:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The series finale of the current series of Doctor Who which will premiere tonight is going to be where everything could change according to the promos about the episode. I'm thinking that this yet to be created article about the episode which could be controversial among the fanbase should be protected for a few weeks from possible vandalism and edit warring in the aftermath of what could happen in the episode. Pahiy (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:59, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Addition of unsourced/false/poorly sourced information.
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:38, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – General non-autoconfirmed disruption/vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:02, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – 8 reversions and counting (false information and vandalism) in the last couple of hours. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:03, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:37, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 04:05, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. The page has required virtually continuous protection for the past two years. MelanieN (talk) 01:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP addition of poorly sourced and controversial material (over 8 reverts). Requests for talk page discussion go ignored. GreenC 14:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Bobherry Talk Edits 14:38, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recent uptick in unref changes/BLPvio various IPs. Dl2000 (talk) 16:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:44, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Elizium23 (talk) 05:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. By Materialscientist. Single IP appears to be involved. -- ferret (talk) 22:34, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther : Talk 08:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I only see 1 recent revert, and the editor you're reverting would not be stopped by semi-protection. -- ferret (talk) 22:44, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued addition of Inspector Gadget which didn’t air on the channel.
- Already protected by administrator Wugapodes. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
03 March 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pizza butt, pizza smut, pizza slut. So many bad jokes for so many aspiring vandals to change it to, I'm suprised it's only happened as much as it has.
. Tornado547 (talk) 19:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Many people have consistently been adding commercial links in the external links section, and there really is no need for further sites anyway. puggo (talk) 19:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs keep deleting material they don't like from this article. Jayjg (talk) 22:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 22:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Sudden vandalism by multiple new users.VVikingTalkEdits 14:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 14:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra talk 14:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Some VOA attacks. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra talk 14:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 15:00, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected Deep fried okra talk 15:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra talk 15:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected Deep fried okra talk 15:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra talk 15:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected Deep fried okra talk 15:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra talk 15:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Rash of edits (over 50 today) from multiple IPs adding fancruft + nicknames which break wikilinks - Arjayay (talk) 13:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 14:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP addresses are messing up the article by placing random dates for when the episode(s) premiered. ThisWasOssain (talk) 00:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:16, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps deleting without explanation. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:35, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. It's just two edits by one IP address, and we can't semi-protect on that basis. If it happens again, report it at WP:AIV. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP editors have been vandalising the page, especially after a comment on Instagram by Keating over ships in Singapore that was subsequently proven false. Require page protection. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean (talk) 11:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 11:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism in recent days. MPFitz1968 (talk) 00:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite move protection: recent move without talk page discussion (this is a GA article and it has been published)...BTW when I moved it back I missed that Ebola should be uppercase letter, thank you Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:50, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Move protected (For the title with the lowercase ebola.) ~Anachronist (talk) 05:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated unsourced additions to BLP. . TJMSmith (talk) 01:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Fuzheado | Talk 03:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This was previously protected for sockpuppetry as a user (or users) were POV-pushing their own narrative into the page. The page protection was lifted today and an IP immediately edited it again to their POV, despite the reference they used not supporting the content. Would request that this be fully protected. . CNMall41 (talk) 21:35, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Pending changes isn't helping when unsupported additions keep being inserted. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:40, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. I have removed the indefinite PC protection and replaced it with indefinite semi-protection. The protection log reveals that the article has needed almost continuous semi-protection, imposed on top of the PC protection, for the last several years. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism/BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Return of IPV4 and very probably same IPV6 user with apparent COI edits, removing negative information (this is also apparent sockpuppetry). The recent edits also included random textual vandalism. David Brooks (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2020 (UTC) ETA: previous 1-week protection expired 21 Feb. David Brooks (talk) 19:00, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. @DavidBrooks: I've blocked the single static IPv4 (for a month) that has been doing this for the past month+. Let's see if that's enough for now. Feel free to ping me or leave a message on my talk page if things continue. -- ferret (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced changes, IP synth issues. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 23:06, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 23:09, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
04 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The movie is hot right now, and the page is being repeatedly being edited with unsourced material and persistently vandalized. Ranadhira Naika (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated additions of unsourced content by IP and newly registered editors. Ss112 07:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism on my talk page, please restrict the edits to autoconfirmed users. — The Ultimate Let's Talk 07:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Too much disruption over the last couple of days for PC-protection to be useful. . Vanamonde (Talk) 19:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 06:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, looks like it is not needed at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 11:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 08:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: the article was also semi-protected for 5 days last month. There have been more than a dozen IPs and SPAs vandalizing this article over the last 24 hours. — MarkH21talk 12:10, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Indef semi-prot may be more beneficial here Thepenguin9 (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of Week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., Let me know if the vandalism continues after it is over. Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 14:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Indef semi-prot may be more beneficial here Thepenguin9 (talk) 14:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Seems to be undergoing a lot of edits from users who disagree with the subject . Thepenguin9 (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Swarm of ip vandals, highly visible page due to current outbreak. Every time the page has been un-protected the vandilsm returns in force. Hemiauchenia (talk) 06:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Also vandalism by newly-registered users. Esowteric+Talk 11:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra talk 11:31, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Indefinite protection often leads to problems later on, as well as criticism of the protector. Eventually, the novelty and emotional impact of the subject will fade and the vandals will be on to the next big story. Deep fried okra talk 11:31, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Too much unsourced edits by IPs, possible sockpuppets. The Banner talk 16:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection As the band have just announced they are reforming, lots of people are rushing to update it, but doing it in a way that does not respect the good article criteria. More haste, less speed please. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: I recently had to have my userpage fully protected temporarily, but when that ran out, I also lost the indefinite semi-protection that it's had since 2010, and I'd really like that back, please. JuneGloom07 Talk 01:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @JuneGloom07: My reading of WP:UPROT is that a need has to be demonstrated. The user who was editing your user page has been indefinitely blocked and that would have occurred earlier if you had been able to attract the attention of an admin. Contact me if problems persist. Johnuniq (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I currently do not see any reason for indefinite protection--Ymblanter (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an unregistered user keeps on vandalizing this page. SciPunk (talk) 10:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of erroneous/fictitious information. Hiwilms (talk) 12:39, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Hiwilms: Sorry but this is a high-turnover noticeboard and admins can't take the time to work out what is fictious in a topic they may not be familiar with. Please put a brief explanation on article talk with an example of a bad recent edit and a reason an ignorant admin could follow to see that it is junk. Then request again, mentioning the talk. Johnuniq (talk) 05:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Persistent vandalism – IP persistently adding odd sentences . Auric talk 16:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined IP blocked. Please post again if problem persists. Johnuniq (talk) 06:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by 4 different IPs in the past 25 hours. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 07:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 09:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being targeted by IP addresses adding incorrect information regarding the Flyweight title which was officially vacated February 29, however, IPs are changing it to December because that’s when it was announced the event on the 29th would be for the flyweight belt. Rockchalk717 03:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Rockchalk717: It appears you and the IP have reached an accord at User talk:102.41.88.183? If needed, post again. Johnuniq (talk) 05:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Persistent move warring mostly initiated by WhiteCas despite concensus in the talk page 190.175.57.68 (talk) 03:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I left a warning at User talk:WhiteCas#Eternal Love of Dream. Please notify me if further action is required (that is, if the article is moved again without a new consensus). Johnuniq (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 05:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent edits from unregistered IPs. Shanze1 (talk) 05:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Given the nature of vandalism, it is feasible that meatpuppetry could be employed to vandalise the page. Thepenguin9 (talk) 18:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page was protected previously because an variable IP address user kept adding comments that should have gone on the talk page. Protection has expired, and editor returned to make more comments in the article. (diff 1) (diff 2). This was raised at CLCStudent's talk page by User:Jochen Burghardt. Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 00:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Jochen Burghardt: If you have any comments I suppose you should add them here. Tridwoxi (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – There is ongoing discussion on the talk page. Mojoworker (talk) 00:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A blocked IP editor [1] has been attempting to dodge their ban by creating additional accounts (User talk:Ritto77777) and editing from other IP addresses [2]. This individual continues to disruptively insist on the same edit despite the ongoing talk page discussion. BUjjsp (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:31, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism with clear COI. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. Definitely in need. There has been a long term struggle with IPs with a COI. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Spike in petty vandalism in last 48 hours. Requesting for 7 days b/c there's not a history of vandalism on the page before this spike. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:05, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Being hit actively by a few IPs at the moment. Red Phoenix talk 16:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs are still angry that this TV presenter came out as gay recently. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: somebody in the 88 ip range wants to turn Michael into a pugilist. Although not a daily occurrence it has been going on for a couple weeks. MarnetteD|Talk 18:28, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 04:23, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As this article relates to a fictional person in a popular video game, people have edited the page to include meme/joke phrases as well as a constant stream of removals/edit of this character's relationship, either changing it to another fictional person in the game or just straight up removing it. This could be because it is a gay relationship, or just an attempt to be funny. Micro (Talk) 05:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As previously requested for {{Deaths in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak}} and {{Confirmed cases in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak}}, one template experienced vandalism while the other did not however both were at high risk and thus were both protected. This new template combines both templates' functions and since it deprecates the previous two, I now RPP for this new one as it's at high risk for future vandalism. comrade waddie96 (talk) 13:29, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Also ECP move protected for three months, per Template:Confirmed cases in 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak. Johnuniq (talk) 06:00, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 15:01, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Significant number of IP/new user edits over the past several months are made-up proverbs. Page doesn't see a ton of edits, so pending seems appropriate. creffett (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:30, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – As with several other letters of the Latin alphabet - low-frequency vandalism by unregistered and new users. Most other letters are PC- or semi-protected. creffett (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. I chose indefinite semi to match A. Johnuniq (talk) 05:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – As with several other letters of the Latin alphabet - low-frequency vandalism by unregistered and new users. Most other letters are PC- or semi-protected. creffett (talk) 02:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. I chose indefinite semi to match A. Johnuniq (talk) 05:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Tends to attract vandals who want to make it redirect to their favorite athlete, politician, sibling, etcc. Tornado547 (talk) 04:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Tornado547: There is no record of disruption in the history of that talk page. Are you referring to the associated disambiguation page? ~Anachronist (talk) 06:10, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - the page did have a lot of disruption so I have protected that. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- yeah, my bad Tornado547 (talk) 07:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - the page did have a lot of disruption so I have protected that. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Anachronist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well, duh, you stupid bot. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This sort of problem has come up before, and it has always been due to human error. -- HAL, 2001 Deep fried okra talk 12:31, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Johnuniq (talk) 05:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plandu (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 23:45, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. John from Idegon (talk) 23:56, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 00:02, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
05 March 2020
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – IP keeps edit warring over a travel agent whom is on the brink of collapse, . –Davey2010Talk 00:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I believe this is now moot. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Some morons keep coming in and inserting childish edits, like "peepee poopoo". -ShorinBJ (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - there's only been one incident of disruptive editing in 10 days, and the editor in question reverted that, so protection is currently unneeded. Please resubmit if vandalism reoccurs Nosebagbear (talk) 14:33, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: In order for newbies not to go there & tamper with very delicate & imperative scripts. . Celestina007 (talk) 16:04, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Also, Javascript and css pages in userspace are implicitly interface-protected, so only you and interface administrators can edit js pages in your userspace. InvalidOStalk 16:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by several IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 14:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm not sure if it was all vandalism, but at best it was disruptive, unsourced, editing and reverts Nosebagbear (talk) 14:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (and some of the weirder vandalism I've seen) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is an old AfD. There is no reason for anybody to change it. Despite this it has been attacked several times. Might as well protect it indefinitely?. DanielRigal (talk) 13:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brihaspati (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: @Deepfriedokra: I see that you removed some text on 12 January 2020 and I semi-protected the article shortly thereafter. Judging by my comment on article talk (which I can't remember!), I thought there was a BLP issue. There is now a lavisly referenced "Controversy" section in the article with text looking very similar to what you removed. Do you know anything about the topic? Perhaps protection should be declined and the issue raised at WP:BLPN although finding people willing to wade into this kind of topic might be tricky. Johnuniq (talk) 06:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
@Johnuniq: I really don't know/remember the page. I tend to remove negative BLP that is not adequately sourced when I see it. I learned through bitter experience to never protect the negative BLP version of a page, even unintentionally, and even with what looks like good sources. Without looking at the current version, on principle, if the material is being challenged, I will not protect it. Referring to WP:BLPN sounds a much better idea.Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 08:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC) PS. I remember being mortified at the time.Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 08:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement. Interstellarity (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done I'm seeing exactly one harmless test edit, and no disruption in months. Could you elaborate if I'm missing something? ~ mazca talk 23:14, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP article subject to vandalism by numerous IPs after subject appeared in media following crowd related incident. Egghead06 (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of the weekend, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:13, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Two registered editors working together to add spammy test edits to the page. King of Scorpions 17:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Both were blocked by Materialscientist at the time; no further disruption so far. Re-report if more accounts appear, otherwise protection looks unnecessary at this time. ~ mazca talk 20:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism due to recent Twitter gaffe. A week should let everyone move on. Slywriter (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ mazca talk 23:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Requesting just short-term semi-protection as the airline is not yet in administration, but mostly IP editors are editing back and forth about whether it is or isn't. I'm seeing that it isn't yet; see this very recent BBC article or even more recent Sky piece, which states it is expected to go into administration. –Erakura(talk) 23:15, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for 24 hours which is hopefully long enough for the situation to clarify itself. Agreed that there's an unhealthy amount of unsourced editing going on, but this situation should indeed become more unambiguous soon. ~ mazca talk 23:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Reduce protection duration or unprotect: Potentially massive collateral damage. @Bbb23: pinging protecting admin. InvalidOStalk 14:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to have already been unprotected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done. Protection had already expired when the request was made. Favonian (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
06 March 2020
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism and IP user suspect as sock puppet try to delete all of information. Ministerboy (talk) 00:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 22:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of what is either IP vandalism or disruptive editing. The official information that the Icelandic Directorate of Health has defined Ischgl in Austria as a high-risk area is being repeatedly deleted by unregistered user(s). The information has been deleted multiple times by different IP addresses, and a talk page thread for good-faith discussion of this issue has had no effect. Sylgja (talk) 08:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Update: Information is no longer being deleted after an IP user added a reference that local officials in Ischgl disputed whether Ischgl was the actual source of infection. This is fine - the question is not whether the Icelandic Directorate of Health is right or wrong but which areas are as of 29 February officially defined by Icelandic authorities as high-risk areas for residents of Iceland. It looks like the problem is solved, thanks! --Sylgja (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent material deletion, seems like meatpuppetry that is becoming common in malayalam language films that begins with changing box office figures to gain locks on further editing especially plots. Often the reasoning will be "story shouldn’t have been disclosed to public as the movie just got released and it will affect their box office collections". 2001:569:FCF7:6C00:7D:E654:E8F6:6B86 (talk) 21:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A lot of useful edits come from IPs. While there isn't a large amount of disruption, it's better that the article remain stable for readers. — Wug·a·po·des 22:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nihlus 22:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 22:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism after original IP's talk page access revoked. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only the one edit after talk page access for the IP was removed. Will keep an eye on it. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dee03 18:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Famous YouTuber. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 20:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello there, the page keeps getting vandalized by random users, adding non-sense information's that he is Albanian, and that his father is Hashim Thaçi. Prase is a Serbian YouTube star, which primarily gets viewed by younger-audience, which is why probably more people will start vandalizing the page.User:PolePoz ‐Talk‐ 09:18 [PM], 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- I Am a Singer (Chinese season 3) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- I Am a Singer (Chinese season 4) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Singer 2017 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: There has been an ongoing war about anonymous editors. One editor claimed to have fix the article but another editor undid his edit because he was right and it was vandalism he did (both even reported vandalism to each other, as seen here. Please help me investigate. I need these articles to do Page protection for at least three months; i believe this is not the first time that happened before. (203.78.15.150 (talk) 05:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC))
- And finally, if I found u guys are doing wrong editing, and this clarify I didn’t vandalise the page anytime, from the beginning :) Plz feel from to discuss in the talk page. I feel confident in handling thisnshow. :) 118.141.162.67 (talk) 11:23, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Hardly seems an intractable problem, the articles are lightly edited, and I don't see anything looking like edit warring recently. --Jayron32 16:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Ext-con might be more appropriate, but I think some help pages should be protected by default, especially since an IP blanked the page. Thepenguin9 (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.. One single vandalism is not going to get you full protection. --Jayron32 16:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and BLP violations from current events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Volume of vandalism isn't super high, but it's a BLP. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:20, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 19:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Possible vandalism. I had undid the vandalism revision but the same user (User:118.141.162.67) kept undoing it. He also undid I Am a Singer (Chinese season 4) and Singer 2017). Please investigate. 183.90.36.19 (talk) 03:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @183.90.36.19: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:37, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I fixed the parsing issue for the bot however an admin or someone more experienced may want to merge this request with the one below. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done, declined below--Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism @Materialscientist:. Flix11 (talk) 22:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — LeoFrank Talk 18:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Massive campaign to add the incident around a tweet in the article, but that incident is already mentioned. The overblown campaign is in breach of WP:BLP. The Banner talk 18:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., in y opinion the disruption level is too low even for semi-protection--Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits by IPs and new users hell bent on changing the term 'Allahabad' to 'Prayagraj' despite it contravenes WP:COMMONNAME. The article Allahabad is still not renamed to Prayagraj. See disruptive changes [3], [4]. . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:05, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- IPs from Lucknow at it again today [5] and [6]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator El C. Jayron32 16:56, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP adding content specifically against consensus on talk page. Not responding to notification on talk page. Garuda28 (talk) 20:11, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There were accounts and IPs edit warring. Trying full protection to slow it down. --Jayron32 17:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism from an editor using multiple IP addresses. Page was previously protected briefly but vandalism has restarted so a longer period may be advisable. ElKevbo (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC) Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA sockpuppets attacking page. -- LuK3 (Talk) 16:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Article is a target of vandalism for the last few months which is possibly by students of the school. Mr Xaero ☎️ 17:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There has been a lot of disruptive IP edits and vandalism on the page, consistently in the past few days. Page protection is needed to ensure such edits do not happen. XRedParrot (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Shorter-term semi-protection has been tried in the recent past to no avail. Jayron32 16:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated and recurring target of an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of A week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.; The related ips have been blocked, but given that it's an lta, they'll be back. Hopefully pc will prevent shenanigans.Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 16:16, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of WP:INDISCRIMINATE/WP:NOTCV material by IP, as well as extremely poorly formatted material. Very likely a COI. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, recent (post-2014) disruption ios due to just one IP editor who has a red talk page. Please wanr them, and if they continue after warning we can block them from editing this article.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:31, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 23:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, seems to have stopped, apologies for not reacting on time--Ymblanter (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There has been a lot of disruptive IP edits and unnecessary content edits on the page. The edits are not factually right and need to be reversed frequently. Page protection is needed to ensure such edits do not happen. Buzztrack (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined. Your promotional edits to the article are the only ones that have recently been reverted. — Newslinger talk 13:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 01:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. obviously normally it would be blocked, but it's one of the highest margins to meet, with huge numbers of GF editors reverting rapidly. If it recontinues please resubmit and I'll add a short term PC coverage. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 12:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Repeated instances of vandalism by anonymous users with unsourced information. It has happened several times over the past few months. Please look into this. Kalariwarrior (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of unsourced content by various IPs. — LeoFrank Talk 05:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator JzG. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Unsalt: Hopefully you'll excuse the long justification I have to give for this one. In August 2018, RHaworth create-protected Au5 due to repeated re-creations of a version of the article that didn't meet the general notability criteria or music biography criteria. The relevant discussion, however, failed to distinguish between the article and the person. The article may have been poorly referenced, but the person meets criteria 1, 7 and 9 of WP:MUSICBIO (the quick Google search to check is encouraged).
He is the main subject of dozens of articles by notable-enough media organisations like BroadwayWorld,[1] Dancing Astronaut,[2] UKF,[3] Bassrush,[4] Your EDM,[5] Scene Noco,[6] RaverRafting[7] and EDM.com[8] and has been covered by the Daily Sitka Sentinel,[9] EDM Sauce[10] and Mix 247 EDM.[11] He was featured on the 2014 Walt Disney Records album Dconstructed (as covered by Billboard),[12] was the winner of a 2012 remix contest by artist Seven Lions,[13] contributed music to the 2019 Harmonix virtual reality game Audica,[14] has performed at festivals such as South by Southwest (as covered by Mercury News)[15] and Motion Notion,[16] was featured on Ranker's list of the best dubstep songs of 2018[17] and has released 2 EPs and many more singles on label Monstercat (as covered by Billboard),[18] almost making him meet criterion 5 as well.
I attempted to contact the "salting" administrator, but they are unfortunately inactive, so this is my second course of action, as per the guidance on create-protection. I request that the article be unsalted such that I can attempt to create the page and give it another shot at passing the notability criteria. I've created 160 articles and had none deleted. I believe the above information rather than a full draft article is enough to determine whether an article is permitted at this title. The article still exists on the Spanish and Chinese wikis.
Thank you. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 05:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- ^ Desk, TV News. "Nytrix and Au5 Reunite for Melodic, Bass Single 'Always in a Nightmare'". BroadwayWorld.com. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
{{cite web}}
:|last=
has generic name (help) - ^ "Au5 is back with gorgeous four-track EP, 'Dusk'". Dancing Astronaut. 2019-11-26. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "The Story Behind The Song: Au5 - Snowblind". UKF. 2014-09-03. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "5 Tunes That Changed My Life: Au5". Bassrush. 2016-07-18. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ Meadow, Matthew (2014-11-03). "From The Artist's Perspective: Varien & Au5 Talk Monstercat 019 Endeavor". Your EDM. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ SCENE, the New (2017-02-06). "INTERVIEW: Working a Crowd with Au5". Scene Magazine. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "AU5 Dishes Out 'Any Longer/Hit Rewind' EP & Discusses Genre Allegiance & Collaborating With Q'AILA [Exclusive Interview] | RaverRafting". RaverRafting | We Are The Scene. 2016-08-24. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ Staff, EDM com. "Celldweller's "Eon" Gets Massive Remix from Au5 [EDM.com Premiere]". EDM.com - The Latest Electronic Dance Music News, Reviews & Artists. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "BT TALKS TO SENTINEL IN LAS VEGAS: Famed DJ Finds Right Mix at DEF CON". sitkasentinel.com. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ GLU (2019-06-07). "Crystal Skies Open Up With an In-depth Interview". EDM Sauce. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ Murin, Santina (2019-09-21). "Behind The Beat: Crystal Skies At EZoo 2019". Mix 247 EDM. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "Avicii, Kaskade, More to Appear on Disney EDM Remix Album". Billboard. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "TRACK: Au5 & I.Y.F.F.E win Seven Lions' Day to Come Remix Contest". edmtor.com. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "Harmonix confirms VR rhythm shooter Audica is coming to PSVR – TheSixthAxis". Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "SXSW music 2015: Here's the complete lineup". The Mercury News. 2015-03-12. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "BC's Motion Notion Festival Rolls Out Its Initial 2016 Lineup". exclaim.ca. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "The Best Dubstep Songs of 2018". Ranker. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- ^ "The Monstercat Label Model: From YouTube Channel to One Million Record Sales". Billboard. Retrieved 2020-02-22.
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unprotected Nosebagbear (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes protection has done nothing to curtail vandalism. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 03:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - might need to be made indefinite if rate issue recommences afterwards
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Praxidicae (talk) 18:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The high edit volume makes pending-changes protection a burden for reviewers, so I selected semi-protection instead. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 13:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated self-reversion of tests by IPs. Jalen Folf (talk) 23:17, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by numerous IPs. David Biddulph (talk) 23:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plandu (talk) 00:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. both for the vandalism and unsourced edits Nosebagbear (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The history of this title and Draft:Kunal Lalani indicates that new socks may pop up again. Suggest ECP protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Creation protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nervous about blocking drafts off for too long, especially when a single problematic user. If reoccurs, will consider indef at that point Nosebagbear (talk) 13:34, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 05:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- KH-1, high profile BLP so I applied PC for a year. Guy (help!) 08:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator JzG. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes with Semi-Protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 12:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Persistent disruptive editing. Donnowin1 (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry - several IPs trying to change the subject's ethnicity over time, probably Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Ravinariya. creffett (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Newslinger talk 13:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 13:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content is increasing by every day. Brihaspati (talk) 11:56, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal keeps insisting Scorsese is dead with no proof. Crboyer (talk) 21:18, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. before reverting to:
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Extensive pattern of long-term abuse. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:26, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP and non-autoconfirmed vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:36, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- LuK3, seems to be a permanent problem so I applied indefinite semiprotection. Guy (help!) 08:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator JzG. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 01:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Nosebagbear (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Some IP vandalism however there has been some constructive edits from a few IP addresses. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:46, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- LuK3, I applied PC, will that do? Guy (help!) 08:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Sustained high level of IP vandalism. Nixinova T C 01:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Dq209 (talk) 14:50, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by JzG. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Whoever is coming up with this childish vandalism they should seek some help. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 12:49, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Big movie released today. Very hot. Repeated edits with unsourced material, and text edits which are outright mischievous and ridiculous. Vandals are attacking the page again and again. Ranadhira Naika (talk) 11:37, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Continued edit warring to restore rejected changes. Otinflewer (talk) 12:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. 1989 (talk) 12:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{RFPP|nea}}
— Wug·a·po·des 06:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)- I’d like a second opinion, or at least pending changes. 1989 (talk) 09:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Possible UPEs and sockpuppetry. The subject is not independently notable and they are not interested to vet through AfC and keep removing the redirect. GSS 💬 17:43, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Stale. — Wug·a·po·des 07:10, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – continued removal of afd templates. Praxidicae (talk) 00:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:38, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Page has been deleted as per outcome of AfD. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done--Ymblanter (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection:High level of what is IP vandalism or disruptive editing. Repeated editions with material without source or poor generalist media without contrast. The official information of the Autonomous Communities, issued in local media, is being erased or altered repeatedly. The information has been deleted or modified several times by different IP addresses.FLAVIVSAETIVS (talk)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing (adding not properly verified content) by various IP users, probably the Turkish hyped audience. BlackFlanker (talk) 10:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note The requester is attempting to game the system to POV edit the article. User has been warned 3 times of his talk page regarding WP:OR, WP:NPOV and WP:RS additions to the article, diffs: [7], [8], [9]. User furthermore re-added the word "claim" to sections which did not favor his POV despite being warned several times about WP:CLAIM at his talk page. Diff of users POV and OR additions: [10], [11], [12], [13]. 176.88.143.228 (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- User was previously warned about POV editing about other Russian weapons. [14]. 176.88.143.228 (talk) 11:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Content dispute which should be resolved on the article talk page. — Wug·a·po·des 06:54, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Article is currently in the news and is receiving a lot of attention. Page has already been vandalised multiple times. Thepenguin9 (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Good at the time but seems stale. — Wug·a·po·des 06:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Also talk page of WMF-banned user, but there's been a lot of vandalism here. InvalidOStalk 21:54, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator JzG. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 08:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: The WP:ECP protection was experired today, need to increase for the protection for atleast 2 months. Already copyvio, misinfo, edit war, disruptive edits started as soon as the protection expired. Dey subrata (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Notice comment This article has vandalized at this time by IPs, they added irrelevant information about CAA protests, such as coronavirus and Hosni Mubarak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.77.95.122 (talk) 23:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Page has be semiprotected by Bradv. There is some reversion activity, but I decided to leave this for a little while longer to see if ECP was warranted. Nosebagbear (talk) 14:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done by Bradv, been a day since Nosebagbear's comment and disruption seems to have subsided. — Wug·a·po·des
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Repeated vandalism from an LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:25, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Dekimasu. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 07:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The page suffers from a lot of vandalism by anonymous users thinking it’s funny to link the beer to COVID-19. --Nicolapps (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:33, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Dekimasu. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 07:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Ixocactus (talk) 04:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- In my opinion, the level of disruption is insufficient for extended confirmed, and it is too late for semi-protection as the level has subsided.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Disruption still occuring. — Wug·a·po·des
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism – While one recent edit by one IP was good, many other edits by IP editors have been reverted recently and within the past year. George Ho (talk) 08:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – highly visible page due to the current outbreak. There is lots of vandalism edit, violating wp:weight, which has being done by IPs (1 and 2) in the article. Saff V. (talk) 08:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Continued/renewed renewed edit warring while RfC is running. Yilloslime (talk) 15:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please read the talk page RFC; you’re re-adding archive links on sources that have self-corrected. They got Peppermint’s alleged legal name(s) from...Wikipedia. Gleeanon409 (talk) 17:11, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — Wug·a·po·des
Reduction or Unprotection: No longer necessary. The article does not need indefinite protection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8b60:ca00:e0c6:8535:5b48:c469 (talk) 02:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Why do you believe that? The protection is currently indef semi, which is fine, because pending-change-protection was too much of a burden on editors. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected. No convincing arguments presented in the 2½ days since the request was made. Favonian (talk) 18:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. OceanHok (talk) 18:55, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ferret . (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism and serious BLP violations after recent end of previous protection. Johand199 (Talk • Contribs) 22:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator HickoryOughtShirt?4. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Kilumley (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Bongwarrior. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Abuse is continuing after last protection lapsed. KylieTastic (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ponyo. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:05, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
07 March 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor keeps adding not notable person to alumni section. This has been going on for over a year and at least a dozen times removed by me and other editors. Only indefinite protection is going to stop this. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'd endorse either long term semi or PC. It's the same individual adding promo for a podcast. John from Idegon (talk) 17:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined One edit a month (roughly) is not enough to justify protection, and the IPs appear static so try explaining the problem to them, then warn and report to AIV if they persist. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: This has been going on since here[15] at least. We're talking 2015! Since then we have had it entered 19 more times. Try explaining again isn't going to do anything but waste more time. How many more times do we play whack a mole before someone calls an end to this shit? If 19 times isn't persistent vandalism what is? And its 5 times in the last 44 days. That is once every 9 days not once every month or one edit a month....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 18:58, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined a surge of disruptive edits today but before those few edits there was nothing for months. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:52, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. 2001:bb6:5008:7a58::/64 rangeblocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Page received a lot of edits from IPs within a similar range. Potentially meatpuppetry. Thepenguin9 (talk) 17:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- FYI...This is a perfect example of why an organization might not want a Wikipedia article. This isn't a notable subject and I redirected it to the settlement article. John from Idegon (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined we'll see how things go with the redirect. If that doesn't prevent the disruption, just come back. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:14, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Sockpuppetry and edit warring related to off-wiki canvassing. — Newslinger talk 17:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined hasn't been edited at all for two days. Not enough disruption for protection to be warranted. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost every edit is either vandalism or reverting vandalism. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 17:56, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two incidents this month, and only two edits total last month. Yes, there was a lot of disruption in January, and if that returns protection might is worth considering. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:20, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – LTA. Blake Gripling (talk) 15:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lots of edits, but only from a handful of IPs, who have been blocked. No prejudice to another request if it gets out of control. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined edit rate is not high and a certain amount of unhelpful editing is inevitable on popular articles. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: User:Springpfühler and some IPs are actively edit warring on this article. Since Springpfühler is autoconfirmed and IPs are... well IPs, I think a temporary extended confirmed protection should do it for the moment. I've warned Springpfühler for their participation in this edit war, but I would still recommend the reviewing admin take a closer look at all the involved parties. Colonestarrice (talk) 16:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined edit rate is not high and I'm reluctant to lock everyone out of a popular article just because a few people can't play nice. If it comes to it, the editors involved can be blocked but that's a last resort. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Content dispute/edit warring – Three autoconfirmed users involved in edit warring, should return to their talk page discussion instead. IamNotU (talk) 14:29, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. See my message on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent ongoing vandalism, including fake death details. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., the next one will likely be indefinite--Ymblanter (talk) 20:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 17:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Intermittent vandalism/BLP issues, requesting on behalf of User:2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (and endorsing the request). creffett (talk) 19:51, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:59, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – see the article's history. Benyamin (talk) 15:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Alivardi (talk) 19:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 19:42, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruption after recent page protection expired. S0091 (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: repeated section blanking by anon editors [16][17][18][19][20]. Enhanced protection may be required if an admin determines the anons are sock/meat of blocked editor making this edit and similar ☆ Bri (talk) 13:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:54, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:02, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:58, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: High level of IP vandalism and disruptive editing. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 18:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. and Pending-changes protected for a period of a month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Come back in a month if it needs renewing. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – As above. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 05:39, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ad Orientem. MelanieN (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. jsx 10:03, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – pending changes is not enough, try semi for a while. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 10:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. MelanieN (talk) 17:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:37, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 17:38, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Long-term caste-related edit warring, mostly by Shivambo007 over the past couple of days, but also by a handful of other new editors and IPs over the past several months. creffett (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- A combo of Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. & Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:10, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- DeltaQuad, there is edit warring within the past week by both registered and IP editors (so recent disruptive activity), and I'm entirely uninvolved in the content of this article (so I'm not disputing the content either way and dispute resolution isn't really applicable to me). Since the edit warring is directly related to the page subject's caste, I believe WP:GS/Caste applies here, and since discretionary sanctions are authorized by GS/Caste, page protection would be a reasonable enforcement measure. The page has been protected in the past year for this exact issue. I ask that you reconsider this decline. creffett (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm happy to get a second opinion, particularly from @Utcursch:, but Shivambo007 will pass autoconfirmed pretty soon, even without editing and it won't change anything to use semi/PC, but admin protection would be the next step. Given that, I don't know enough about the content - either way, GS & individual user blocks are beyond the scope of RFPP. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- DeltaQuad, there is edit warring within the past week by both registered and IP editors (so recent disruptive activity), and I'm entirely uninvolved in the content of this article (so I'm not disputing the content either way and dispute resolution isn't really applicable to me). Since the edit warring is directly related to the page subject's caste, I believe WP:GS/Caste applies here, and since discretionary sanctions are authorized by GS/Caste, page protection would be a reasonable enforcement measure. The page has been protected in the past year for this exact issue. I ask that you reconsider this decline. creffett (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection only: Persistent disruptive editing as usual before a event start. Regice2020 (talk) 03:21, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:11, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User:Bambifan101. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – The page has had several temporary semi locks. The page is still constantly vandalized by mostly IPs and unregistered users. An indefinite PC would allow those edits to be filtered out and would solve the constant vandalism. A higher level could be added if vandalism continues. AmericanAir88(talk) 08:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent sockpuppetry - multiple IPs and at least one single-purpose account have popped up to repeatedly remove sourced content and genre-war. creffett (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:07, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 03:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 03:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 04:17, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sadly article is a victim of vandalism since it is a featured article on the front page. . Mr Xaero ☎️ 17:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 48 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:48, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – As soon as the previous protection expired, IP editors resumed deleting material from the article. Jayjg (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:38, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Wug·a·po·des 22:12, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – An editor has twice now tried to forgo the AfC process by recreating a mainspace draft. See Draft:Tell Me Everything You Don’t Remember and Draft:Tell Me Everything You Don’t Remember (duplicate). Sulfurboy (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined AfC is not a requirement for autoconfirmed users; this is a dispute for WP:AFD not page protection. I'll leave a more detailed explanation on your talk page. — Wug·a·po·des
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Recent sock puppetry, as well as disruptive and BLP-violating edits. Grayfell (talk) 20:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Grayfell, pinging Doug Weller for a second opinion on what level of protection is appropriate - my instinct is to apply PC for a year rather than ECP for a shorter time. Guy (help!) 08:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- JzG I would have quickly agreed except that I just looked at the article and the latest vandalism was from an editor with 12 edits, ironically reverted by two IPs (the first one having missed something). But if you still think a year's PC is best, we can try that and see how it goes. Something's needed in any case. Doug Weller talk 08:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Doug Weller, tricky. I have gone with PC, but also added an HTML comment in the infobox template to remind people not to put in unsourced death dates. Guy (help!) 09:29, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- JzG I would have quickly agreed except that I just looked at the article and the latest vandalism was from an editor with 12 edits, ironically reverted by two IPs (the first one having missed something). But if you still think a year's PC is best, we can try that and see how it goes. Something's needed in any case. Doug Weller talk 08:50, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Already dealt with. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – The history of this title and Draft:Crayons Network indicates that it is likely that new sockpuppets will pop up. Suggest ECP protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:07, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - usually I don't make time-bound create protection, but since this was a single individual in quick succession, I didn't want to permanently hinder future work by others Nosebagbear (talk) 13:03, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Already dealt with. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 00:46, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The IP hopper continuously edits infobox against consensus ignoring the talk page discussion. Ymblanter (talk) 22:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 00:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Plandu (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 20:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked – vandalism. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:55, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done, I revoked talk page access.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
08 March 2020
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. IPs added defamatory info about the island. 110.137.162.190 (talk) 05:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. First off, a landmass can't be defamed. But, in any case, while there has been some vandalism to the article over the last month, it's been so light relative to the amount of eyes on this high traffic article that none of it has stuck for more than a minute or two before being reverted. In the month of February, there were only 11 instances of vandalism and the majority of those were undone within 60 seconds or less. If this increases significantly a new request could be made. Chetsford (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Israel Adesanya, Zhang Weili,Joanna Jędrzejczyk, Alex Oliveira, Mark Madsen and Sean O'Malley
- Israel Adesanya (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Zhang Weili (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Joanna Jędrzejczyk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Alex Oliveira (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Sean O'Malley (fighter) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Mark Madsen (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Temporary Semi-protection only Persistent disruption Regice2020 (talk) 08:28, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done, protected some, other do not need protection--Ymblanter (talk) 19:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing begins immediately after the expiration of PP [21]. One of the older name change vandalism [22] before PP. . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Socio-economic impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus outbreak (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: IPs had persistently linked the article to 2020 Malaysian political crisis. It had been going on for days now. Lulusword (talk) 05:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 06:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:18, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism after recent protection expired. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:46, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Content warring by IPs from Sacramento, California. Binksternet (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. KidAd (talk) 21:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 13:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Due to a controversial contestant that was disqualified from winning the program after production wrapped on the pre-recorded phase autoconfirmed editors with low edit counts keep changing the contestant's final placement in the article despite this information not being available to the general public since the broadcaster has announced they plan on airing the pre-recorded phase as intended. Changing information about a living person without reliable sources is a violation of WP:BLP. Requesting extended confirmed protection for 2 months while the program is on-air and highly visiable. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 02:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done There’s a lot of action on the page, but it seems to be handled fairly well. I don’t see any obvious disruption that needs prevented at this time, N.J.A. | talk 13:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – it seems that no lessons have been learned about adding soapbox-like material after the previous protection period. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is being targeted with spam and vandalism. Mr Xaero ☎️ 14:20, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 16:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent IP socking. Velella Velella Talk 10:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – As it is international women's day today, the page is getting a lot of vandalism. Agent00x (talk) 10:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- (troublesome, those women.) -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 11:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 12:06, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended-protected talk pages
- Talk:Brianna Wu (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Canada Park (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Nair (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
- Talk:Two-state solution (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Reduce to semi-protection: I can understand the use of ECP for controversial topics and pages frequently vandalized by autoconfirmed accounts, but ECP talk pages prevent the vast majority of Wikipedia users from even submitting edit requests. Our protection policy states that "talk pages are not usually protected, and are semi-protected only for a limited duration in the most severe cases of vandalism". This means that ECP talk pages are a violation of Wikipedia policy. Even the ARBPIA policy (visible on Talk:Two-state solution) says that "Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests". In the case of Talk:Canada Park, the talk page is ECP while the corresponding article isn't even semi-protected. For this reason, I request that all the above pages be reduced to semi-protection, and possibly in the case of Talk:Canada Park, remove the protection entirely or increase protection on the corresponding article. Sanjay7373 (talk) 07:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected First of all, just on principle I won't consider a bulk request like this just because of policy wonkery (Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy). Second, you should discuss the individual cases with the administrators concerned first, (@Courcelles, KrakatoaKatie, and MusikAnimal:, all of whom are still active). Third, those protections are all marked as arbitration enforcement actions and cannot be undone on the whim of one admin. If you want to make a case that protection is no longer necessary on individual talk pages and the protecting admin won't listen to you, please come back or come directly to my talk page. If you want to make a case against the use of ECP on talk pages in general, you need to start an RfC. These protections have been in place since 2016, so a quick chat with admins involved might be all that's necessary. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:48, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: I'm not an admin or Sanjay7373, but I did want to point out that the instructions at the top of this page include instructions for mutiple requests and that this request appears to follow that format (all meet the same criteria of being requests for unprotection of extended confirmed talk pages). Clovermoss (talk) 19:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Clovermoss: I'm very well aware of the instructions; I was there when they were written. :) My issue here is that these pages were protected at different time by different admins for different reasons, and the proper approach in the first instance is to approach the admins responsible and ask them to consider whether the protection is still necessary. Alternatively, if Sanjay is objecting to all uses of ECP on talk pages on a technicality, he needs to start an RfC. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: I trust your judgement as an admin (where knowledge of policy is part of the job description). :) The only reason I made the comment was because of the firstly section of your response, and my comment appears to have been unnessecary. I hope you have a nice day and wish all the best, Clovermoss (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not against all extended-protected talk pages. Some of them, such as Talk:Michael White (author) were left out. If a talk page is being vandalized frequently by autoconfirmed accounts, then sure, I might support adding ECP to the page. But the pages I listed above seem to have been protected simply because they have to with the Arab-Israeli conflict or other controversial topics. And I also notice that only a few of these talk pages are ECP — some pages which are extended-protected under ARBPIA, such as Jerusalem and Arab-Israeli conflict, do not have extended-protected talk pages, and Talk:Gamergate controversy is only semi-protected. Sanjay7373 (talk) 00:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: I trust your judgement as an admin (where knowledge of policy is part of the job description). :) The only reason I made the comment was because of the firstly section of your response, and my comment appears to have been unnessecary. I hope you have a nice day and wish all the best, Clovermoss (talk) 19:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Clovermoss: I'm very well aware of the instructions; I was there when they were written. :) My issue here is that these pages were protected at different time by different admins for different reasons, and the proper approach in the first instance is to approach the admins responsible and ask them to consider whether the protection is still necessary. Alternatively, if Sanjay is objecting to all uses of ECP on talk pages on a technicality, he needs to start an RfC. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:47, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @HJ Mitchell: I'm not an admin or Sanjay7373, but I did want to point out that the instructions at the top of this page include instructions for mutiple requests and that this request appears to follow that format (all meet the same criteria of being requests for unprotection of extended confirmed talk pages). Clovermoss (talk) 19:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 02:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:27, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 08:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Core policy page with history of severe blanking and vandalism. JavaHurricane 06:53, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:44, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pakistan Armed Forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Indefinite ECP Disruption by IP. Should be already protected per WP:INDIAPAKISTAN30500. Aman Kumar Goel(Talk) 15:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:34, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 20:54, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated vandalism by multiple IPs. 2.O.Boxing 00:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:15, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ministerboy (talk) 23:24, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DeltaQuad. MelanieN (talk) 01:02, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: short-term of 24 to 48 hours. Been some IP vandalism given rumors of his death circulating on twitter Slywriter (talk) 00:13, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DeltaQuad. MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requesting semi-protection for two weeks per discussion here.
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: High level of IP and account vandalism, occurring in frequent periods over the past six months. Ylevental (talk) 18:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DeltaQuad. MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator DeltaQuad. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:36, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Egregious defamatory edits are being made by multiple accounts without sources. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 21:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:12, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Alexf. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 23:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Alucard 16: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf did install protection, but it was lost when the page was deleted and restored. MelanieN (talk) 00:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
09 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: This is a precaution as the game has just been announced, most titles in the series have semi-protection. J.Turner99 (talk) 18:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. I've added the page to my watchlist and will keep an eye on it. Feel free to re-request if the page begins to experience disruption. — Wug·a·po·des
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism in infobox by IP user despite multiple warnings. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 21:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Template used at WP:Contact us, which is full protected. Sdkb (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template protected WP:Contact us should probably be cascade protected, but Cyberpower678 tried that already and I'm not sure what I would break if I tried it again. — Wug·a·po·des 20:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: The vast majority of edits are by IP's and unconstructive, often being reverted. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., I see quite a few IP edits which have not been reverted--Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Repeated IP vandalism closely related to Boohbah, which itself PC protected. Koldcuts (talk) 11:42, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of incorrect content (per WP: Musical Theatre's rules) by unregistered users. I have already tried a discussion on the talk page and an invisible comment in the editing space. Apathyash (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 20:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 17:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the disruption returns once the protection expires, let me or another administrator know. — Wug·a·po·des 20:15, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of content by hopping IPs over several months, which was finally agreed not to be included on the talk page. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Poydoo (talk) 11:19, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 12:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Must be something in the news recently, hit by IP and newly created accounts all day. Protected previously, another break may be in order. Ifnord (talk) 14:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. ~ mazca talk 14:40, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Please look at recent edits - removal of sourced critical material using misleading edit summaries, adding unsourced, pov edits removing African-American. There have been coi issues as well, and I think some sort of off-wiki attempt to manage the article. Doug Weller talk 19:33, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and poorly written information, possibly from this blocked IP. −αΣn=1NDi[n][Σj∈C{i}Fji[n − 1]+Fexti[(n^−1)] 11:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 11:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:20, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting on behalf of Maine Ferrick for repeated disruptive editing. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. No idea what that IP editor is trying to achieve but they aren't stopping, and it isn't helping. ~ mazca talk 14:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: draft Draft:Gabriel Kunda Jr. passes WP:NFOOTY and is ready for mainspace. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- Protected (back in 2013) by CactusWriter, who is still around. -- Hoary (talk) 23:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
- @CactusWriter, Sulfurboy, KylieTastic, and Bkissin: - since the CW's last edit was on the fourth, I'm happy to process this. However, there seems to be something with multiple drafts, or declined drafts on the basis of pre-existing accepted drafts? I've pinged everyone who has had something to do with the processing side - could you guys clarify, so that if I unprotect, I can be confident the right version will make its way in? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nosebagbear, Can you clarify what you're asking? I'm unclear what the confusion is. The draft we have ready for mainspace unquestionably passes WP:NFOOTY, if it needs to be disambiguated in someway to keep the protection in place, that's fine. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sulfurboy: - the draft you link was declined today by Kylie, as another draft had been accepted by Bkissin Draft:Gabriel Kunda, Jr. which was thus moved to mainspace. They were both made by Vivalionel1, with functionally identical content (interestingly he's half an inch taller in one). Nosebagbear (talk) 13:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nosebagbear, Ah, I didn't notice there was duplicates. I suppose as long as one was moved into draftspace then we should be fine. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've redirected the above title. If they want to be swapped, any page mover or admin can handle it. Nosebagbear (talk)
- Nosebagbear, Ah, I didn't notice there was duplicates. I suppose as long as one was moved into draftspace then we should be fine. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sulfurboy: - the draft you link was declined today by Kylie, as another draft had been accepted by Bkissin Draft:Gabriel Kunda, Jr. which was thus moved to mainspace. They were both made by Vivalionel1, with functionally identical content (interestingly he's half an inch taller in one). Nosebagbear (talk) 13:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nosebagbear, Can you clarify what you're asking? I'm unclear what the confusion is. The draft we have ready for mainspace unquestionably passes WP:NFOOTY, if it needs to be disambiguated in someway to keep the protection in place, that's fine. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- @CactusWriter, Sulfurboy, KylieTastic, and Bkissin: - since the CW's last edit was on the fourth, I'm happy to process this. However, there seems to be something with multiple drafts, or declined drafts on the basis of pre-existing accepted drafts? I've pinged everyone who has had something to do with the processing side - could you guys clarify, so that if I unprotect, I can be confident the right version will make its way in? Nosebagbear (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done Nosebagbear (talk) 14:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of additional protections when I accepted. I looked at Kylie's note that subject passed NFOOTY and worked from there, seeing no duplicate in mainspace. Self-reminder to be better at doing my due-diligence. Bkissin (talk) 14:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nosebagbear Thanks for handling this. The pages were protected due to multiple recreations following the 2013 AFD deletion. There were no other issues. — CactusWriter (talk) 14:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: just make it for today, vandalism very likely since its featured. Neverbuffed (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Neverbuffed: Pages are not protected pre-emptively (I can't find the policy on that atm but it's standard procedure). Also see Wikipedia:Main Page featured article protection. Johnuniq (talk) 08:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of OR material sourced from YouTube videos. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 00:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Coffeeandcrumbs: The last IP edit was 28 February 2020 and none for months earlier, and there is no explanation on article talk so I can't see if there is a consensus being broken or if the IP's edits warrant protection after this time. Johnuniq (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:Efn Chinese name (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:Efn Spanish name (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Update of {{Spanish name}}
- Template:Korean name 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) Update of {{Korean name}}
Indefinite semi-protection: Update of {{Chinese name}}, which is template-protected. Likely to become increasingly high-visibility as it is adopted more and more. Sdkb (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Sdkb: I see the logic but we're not supposed to protect pages in anticipation of what might happen. The transclusion counts of these are small. Please post again (or just post on my talk) when the counts are over a 1000, or when damage has occurred. Johnuniq (talk) 08:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – repeated vandalism by multiple IPv6 addresses. TJRC (talk) 04:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. At least in March it's always the same IPV6 address. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Migsmigss (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 07:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Migsmigss (talk) 17:05, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Migsmigss (talk) 17:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, particularly ethno-nationalistic disruption. Article would be better off protected. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:01, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. One disruptive IP yesterday; before that, not enough disruption to warrant protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: People have kept adding unsubstantiated relationship history and or gossip to this article. ⌚️ (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and synthesis of sources by several IPs. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 02:47, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 03:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IP's have been adding an address; not sure if it's actually the person's. Has been removed and reinstated a couple of times last week. Requested Galobtter a revdel. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 08:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constantly shifting IP editor refuses to use the talk page discussion (initially, they responded to one of my requests to discuss their poorly referenced edits with a talk post on "Fabricated antihistorical fantasy in en.wikipedia") but has failed to continue after multiple requests; continues to add unreferenced content as well. — MarkH21talk 20:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. No matter what we do, an IP keeps restoring unsourced and poorly sourced material to the article. I even tried to adjust my edits by removing the parts that he claimed to be incorrect, yet he insists on reverting everything back to the version that contains unsourced information which is also hardy understandable by English readers. Keivan.fTalk 20:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Keivan.f: The IP speaks well in edit summaries and a couple of their other edits looked good. Please post on article talk to explain the problem and post on the IP's talk when they resume with a polite request to join the discussion at [link to talk section]. Johnuniq (talk) 08:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by multiple IP accounts. First one has been temporarily blocked twice, appears to be the same person using a new IP address making the same edits repeatedly (changing subject's name to The Village Fool, etc). Lilipo25 (talk) 23:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Brazilian players
- Hernanes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Alexandre Pato (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: IP address of blocked user sockpuppeting to revert articles back to his preferred version, despite consensus to the contrary. BucketLists (talk) 14:23, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:16, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:07, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP repeatedly adding outdated vote figures as they don't understand Hebrew and have misinterpreted something on the Election Commission website. Number 57 22:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Oppose: Number 57 keeps reverting to incorrect vote counts. The user completely does not understand what is said on the CEC website in Hebrew, where they are mistaking voter turnout with counted votes. I provided a source to the user, which they had refused to read but, I’ll attach it here, please take a look. [23] 98.115.9.16 (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds like a content dispute. Suggest the IP engage in discussion at the article's talk page to reach consensus about the figures. —C.Fred (talk) 22:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- It's not a dispute as there is a clear right and wrong here. The figures published by the Times of Israel are clearly not the final results, as the totals are lower than the latest figures on the CEC website (which are given as of 22:51 Israeli time on 8 March). The CEC website also states the final results will not be published until 10 March. Number 57 22:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- The IP has now reinstated the outdated results. I'm up to my limit of three reverts. If someone could restore some sanity here, it would be appreciated. Number 57 22:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I will happily engage in talks with anyone and I have but User keeps reverting to misleading results, but before making any decision, please take a look at this. [24] 98.115.9.16 (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've already pointed out to you that the CEC results are timestamped at 22:51 today and that the CEC website states the final results will not be released until 10 March. If you're not willing to listen, how you anyone engage with you? Number 57 22:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? I don’t listen? I’m literally giving you a source that shows final results from Times of Israel, I looked at the CEC and it says rate of votes counted are at 71.52%, you said that is the turnout. It’s not the turnout, but the most interesting thing is you wouldn’t even want to look at what Times of Israel says. If you provide a source that final results are going to be published on 10 March, then I won’t revert. 98.115.9.16 (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well it's on the CEC webpage you've been looking at, but as you only seem to believe the Times of Israel, their site also says "The official results will only be published on March 10." Number 57 22:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I looked at the whole issue and am somewhat amazed. The argument to prefer TOI totals over CEC totals does not sustain itself. TOI totals are lower for all parties than those given by the CEC, so if you are really taking it to heart that 71.52% means "rate of votes counted", then that would mean that TOI results represent (under your own account) a count at some point between 60 and 70%. Ergo, CEC results would still be the most updated ones. Even when Hebrew may not be one's speciallity, logic is blatantly obvious here.
- I think the issue is settled but I would favour protection if the warring goes on. Impru20talk 22:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally providing a source to back your claim about March 10th being the publication date, I don’t know why it took you so long for you to provide it, can’t just make claims without sources. Also, the link you provided is not from the CEC, it’s actually Times of Israel, a source that I supported, I guess CEC doesn’t have the information you talked about like when final results are published, perhaps read the source more carefully next time and your allegation about me only believing what Times of Israel is 100% absurd. 98.115.9.16 (talk) 23:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Finally providing?? I told you an hour ago that the final figures "won't be published until Tuesday (as stated on the CEC page)". The CEC website does have the information at the top of the page if you actually bother looking. Are you just trolling here? Number 57 23:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for finally providing a source to back your claim about March 10th being the publication date, I don’t know why it took you so long for you to provide it, can’t just make claims without sources. Also, the link you provided is not from the CEC, it’s actually Times of Israel, a source that I supported, I guess CEC doesn’t have the information you talked about like when final results are published, perhaps read the source more carefully next time and your allegation about me only believing what Times of Israel is 100% absurd. 98.115.9.16 (talk) 23:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Well it's on the CEC webpage you've been looking at, but as you only seem to believe the Times of Israel, their site also says "The official results will only be published on March 10." Number 57 22:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? I don’t listen? I’m literally giving you a source that shows final results from Times of Israel, I looked at the CEC and it says rate of votes counted are at 71.52%, you said that is the turnout. It’s not the turnout, but the most interesting thing is you wouldn’t even want to look at what Times of Israel says. If you provide a source that final results are going to be published on 10 March, then I won’t revert. 98.115.9.16 (talk) 22:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've already pointed out to you that the CEC results are timestamped at 22:51 today and that the CEC website states the final results will not be released until 10 March. If you're not willing to listen, how you anyone engage with you? Number 57 22:41, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- I will happily engage in talks with anyone and I have but User keeps reverting to misleading results, but before making any decision, please take a look at this. [24] 98.115.9.16 (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- The IP has now reinstated the outdated results. I'm up to my limit of three reverts. If someone could restore some sanity here, it would be appreciated. Number 57 22:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- It's not a dispute as there is a clear right and wrong here. The figures published by the Times of Israel are clearly not the final results, as the totals are lower than the latest figures on the CEC website (which are given as of 22:51 Israeli time on 8 March). The CEC website also states the final results will not be published until 10 March. Number 57 22:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, Finally providing!! I saw perfectly what you said, but you didn’t provide any source to back your claim about Final results on 10 March and I think you are the one just trolling around here. You however don’t read, because CEC does not back your claim about when the final results will be published and it’s quite disappointing how it took you so long to back that kind of claim. 98.115.9.16 (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- It's best both of you refrain from accusing one another of "trolling," per our no personal attacks policy. El_C 23:35, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. El_C 23:17, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring by IPs from Mexico. Binksternet (talk) 03:57, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Numerous "new" editors, all attempting to add the same unreliable source for sales figures. Very likely that all of them are the long-term serial sockpuppeter of Bros articles, TomWatkins1970, and the fan site they are attempting to link to is very likely his/her own website. Needs protecting against editors and IPs without a certain number of edits beforehand. Richard3120 (talk) 21:45, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected maximum length. Again.... 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Page is not monitored. Multiple accounts performing Vandalism(adding their phone numbers). Just reverted over 15+ edits that were months old. Johand199 (Talk • Contribs) 23:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year. This is a redirect, and article creation is not for brand-new editors, and this has been going on a long time, and..., after which the page will be automatically unprotected. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. IPs attacking page. Prime Dole (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 01:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Edit warring and potential sockpuppetry. PC with ext-con automatic?. Thepenguin9 (talk) 12:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists who disagree with the scientific consensus on global warming (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism on a closed discussion, also on the talk page. Probably being targeted from an outside discussion. -- GreenC 23:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 00:36, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Help page expected to become highly visible, but that newcomers would be unlikely to want to edit. Sdkb (talk) 00:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done. Ordinarily, we don't preemptively protect pages, but in this case an exception could be made. El_C 00:34, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
10 March 2020
Pending Changes Protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. – Most of us are waiting for a Direct and these unsourced "Directs" are not helping. Seco86484 (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Problematic IP disruption and vandalism on page since last protection - Needs a longer period of protection to dissuade the behaviour. GUtt01 (talk) 17:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The article has been vandalized 7 times in under 24 hours by various anonymous and one new, registered editor. The school has received media attention as a student whose family member has COVID-19 allegedly broke known quarantine and attended a school function. People are using the article to harass the student and her family. This abuse perhaps falls under WP:BATTLEGROUND. A week's protection may be in order. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. General Ization Talk 12:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 15:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Remove creation protection on Applause Entertainment please; article has been recreated at Applause Entertainment Private Limited, and should be moved to the creation-blocked title so that the article conforms to the WP:AT policy. Protecting admin. @Athaenara: declined request, here, given the protected page's apparent spam history and noting:
→ in re: Applause Entertainment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and Applause Entertainment Private Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
→ see also: users ApplauseEntertainment (talk · contribs), Arpit.toshi (talk · contribs), Theboyhasnonameanymore (talk · contribs), Sumitpatelster (talk · contribs), Saichaitanya4496 (talk · contribs), and others;
my own view is conforming the article to WP:AT and whether the current page should be deleted are separate issues. Thanks, UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:35, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Manual comment: Was the author of AEPL given a copy of AE, because it's remarkable how similar the leads of the deleted and current articles? Looking through AEPL's history, it seems to have been a (successful) attempt to get around the creation protection, so I don't think we should reward it for both gaming the system. I'm weakly against protecting, and agree with Athaenara that AEPL should probably be G11'd like the original. — Wug·a·po·des 00:47, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- I of course can't see the deleted versions of the article, but the current version does not to me seem to qualify for G11 as it is not exclusively promotional as the G11 criterion requires. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- This should probably be resolved via an AfD, as I don't see a clear-cut G11 case for the newly created article. Until then, there is no need to remove the creation-protection. If the need to move is dire, there is always this possibility. Lectonar (talk) 06:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) As a side note looks like this skipped WP:NPR according to the logs so I kicked it back into the NPR queue for further review. The first edit looks like copy and paste to me and the edit by ApplauseEntertainment concerns me. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 08:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unprotected to allow conformity with WP:AT. Concerns over the article and its contents are matters for AfD, not RfPP. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Remove protection from the talk page. Of the two recent admins on the article one is on holiday and the other is de-sysop'd. However being able to create the article page and then finding the talk page protected is a bit of a surprise and should never have happened. The main issue on the article page was probably claims by paid editors and advertising. If your unhappy about the article then by all means send to AfD (If its sent to draft I'd probably end up raising a DRV). Shouldn't ever have a talk page protected and the article page unprotected in all events. This is a possible merge target for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khadija Mushtaq (3rd nomination) ... but its a long story. Roots School System is the parent of all the semi-related articles and it is little sense not to have it. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unprotected HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the last day, two IP users have reverted changes to reflect their preferred style rather than MOS:SURNAME. They've not engaged with the explanation I've given in the edit comments or on the first IP's talk page. I don't want to break the 3RR so have not reverted their revert. . Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined no edits since yesterday SoWhy 10:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The last few days has been ridiculous, can am admin please review the page history. I don't know why Chloe Bennet article is constantly being trolled here, but I feel we need to semi-protect the talk page as well. Govvy (talk) 11:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism.
SSSB (talk) 13:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:29, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Reaper Eternal. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Laredo, Texas TV station articles
- KETF-CD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- KXOF-CD (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes protection: Persistent unconstructive edits by redlinked users. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 04:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 10:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Repeated blanking by a blocked IP 114.5.217.92 (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined per WP:BLANKING, there is no rule that you cannot blank your own talk page. SoWhy 10:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: A disruptive IP hopper has returned and is again disrupting the page. Sabbatino (talk) 08:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 10:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Page is basically an advertisement. J.Turner99 (talk) 09:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 09:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Problems with tone should be fixed by editing, not protecting. SoWhy 10:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A rash of mostly-IP vandalism this past day or so. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Should die down now after it is no more the featured article of the day....Lectonar (talk) 06:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Addition of unsourced content due to political rumours. Kpgjhpjm 06:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done. see below. SoWhy 10:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP and account constantly adding unsourced and promotional material. The IP was warned multiple times, but there is no result of the warnings. GSS 💬 07:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 10:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection:Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IP editors, have had to been reverted by multiple logged-in editors.HRC491 (talk) 07:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @HRC491: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed for bot (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 08:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. SoWhy 10:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple IPs involved in vandalism and disruptive edits. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 10:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: An anon vandal keeps on adding Filipino lyrics of a song supposed to be the "national anthem" of the fans of Kyline Alcantara. If translated to English, the lyrics contain hate messages. Please see this edit as evidence. -WayKurat (talk) 05:45, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 08:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This appears to be a recurring problem, so I've added a longer period of protection. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 08:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent removal of materials without proper discussion from the page. Initially it was full protected for 3 days expired on 9 March, but need more this time I think. Dey subrata (talk) 05:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Dey subrata: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:53, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed parsing for bot (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 08:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator Doug Weller. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 08:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection Edit warring has resumed and so has IP/new account vandalism. Otinflewer (talk) 05:48, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Doug Weller. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 08:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by multiple IP editors, have had to been reverted by multiple logged-in editors. -- /Alex/21 23:37, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — Wug·a·po·des 02:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IP editors adding incorrect character names. Vistadan 00:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 06:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent multiple IPs changing of a disambiguation page into a page duplicating a recent deleted article of a non-notable person with the same name, over the last 3 days. Heiro 01:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Fox. — Wug·a·po·des 01:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection Only Persistent random disruptive editing right after the first protection expired. Regice2020 (talk) 23:44, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one reverted edit since protection expired. — Wug·a·po·des 01:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: There's an ongoing argument on 4chan's /b/ board (nsfw, hence I don't link), IPv6 user persists in vandalizing page to support his argument.
- Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks anon. — Wug·a·po·des 01:09, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — LeoFrank Talk 12:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Let me know if the problems return after the 31 hours. — Wug·a·po·des 23:58, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Ongoing IP additions of unsourced content. creffett (talk) 22:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. It seems to be off-and-on vandalism (probably correlated with fight appearances) that hasn't been well resolved by long periods of protection in the past. Given that it's a BLP, I'd rather not play whack-a-mole. IPs can request edits on the talk page, and any admin should feel free to lower protection when they want to give unrestricted editing another shot. — Wug·a·po·des 01:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Severe vandalism from new and IP users. JavaHurricane 13:04, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Two disruptive editors have been blocked, and the page has been quiet since. I don't think page protection is needed right now, but if things change feel free to request again. — Wug·a·po·des 20:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unreferenced content. Migsmigss (talk) 14:43, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but please check recent edits. There is persistent vandalism and inclusion of unreferenced or wrongly referenced erroneous/false information, leaning on non-POV, seemingly aimed at "elevating" or "bolstering" the prestige of the subject more than necessary, or beyond facts. Please check edit history for more details. Thanks. Migsmigss (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I don't think the situation has changed much since the last request. I've added the page to my watchlist. — Wug·a·po·des 20:39, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unreferenced or non-RS (reliable source)-referenced erroneous details, for example, Instagram posts. Migsmigss (talk) 18:17, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked: Khi lun2000 (talk · contribs) blocked by Ferret. — Wug·a·po·des 20:20, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
11 March 2020
- Electronic Entertainment Expo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- E3 2020 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Speculation. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:25, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor Official statement was made. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just weird IP vandals. Multiple. Jorm (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Looks like just one misguided editor and one vandal testing things out. History isn't great, but it's not particularly overwhelming? ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Meatpuppetry from bored students. Thepenguin9 (talk) 15:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked., protected 12 hours, etc. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Large volumes of vandalism after testing positive for Covid-19.
SSSB (talk) 23:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 31 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hopefully it's just a brief spike, but if the protection expires and problems return, let me know. — Wug·a·po·des 17:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced disruptive edits by IPs. Possible block evasion. Za-ari-masen (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Already protected by me independent of this report. This protection is not due to vandalism, as is claimed above, but a mild form of disruptive editing. Its aim is to gently nudges the IP toward the talk page. El_C 16:17, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism since previous protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ mazca talk 18:31, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism from a few different IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:52, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GoodnightmushTalk 16:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. IPs are/have been blocked a bit; seems like someone playing around. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Poydoo (talk) 14:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Possible sock puppet editing with bias toward subject of article. BlewsClews (talk) 23:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed parsing for bot. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 06:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user is persistently making unsupported edits, possibly for adding the names of a few non-notable persons in the article. jojo@nthony (talk) 03:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 09:15, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: There's an ongoing harassment issue by someone spread across multiple pages, including WP:AN (review the revedelled edits between 05:39 and 06:54 10 March 2020). I think semi-protect should suffice. Adding a diff from User talk:Bidgee for context.1 Mr rnddude (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. I popped on semi-protection for 2 days for good measure. Lectonar (talk) 11:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Have been beaten to it..talk-page is semi-protected for 2 weeks now. Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the prompt responses Lectonar and Zzuuzz. Mr rnddude (talk) 11:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Have been beaten to it..talk-page is semi-protected for 2 weeks now. Lectonar (talk) 11:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Target of lots of spam. Scaledish (Chances are I am wrong, sorry :blush:) (talk) 19:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 06:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP editor changing commander's name without explanation or source, as well as other recent (since 12/2019) vandalism. Dhtwiki (talk) 21:23, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 06:43, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A Tiktok user posted a video linking to this article, which went viral and has been viewed 450k+ times and counting, resulting in a wave of vandalism. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 06:00, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandals back soon after previous protection ended. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done--Ymblanter (talk) 08:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by San Jose and Sacramento IPs, including the blocked range Special:Contributions/172.58.32.0/21. Binksternet (talk) 20:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
An IP, signing up under various names, all WP:SPAs, is inserting inaccurate content. It amounts to the same edit each time. As a world record progression, the record is chronological. The record for this category was set in 2001, the content they keep trying to add is an inferior mark set in 2003. Trackinfo (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Trackinfo: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from a million different IPs that I believe are operated by the same person. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 06:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent sprees of vandalism. Seems to be long term. –eggofreason(talk · contribs) 23:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator HickoryOughtShirt?4. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 04:10, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 03:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:12, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Not much has changed since the last request. — Wug·a·po·des 03:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
List of Henry Danger episodes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The current protecting admin of this Nick-related list Samsara has not been contributing since November 7 making them inactive. It has been like this from 2017 nearly three years ago. Unfortunately the article doesn't get un-protected until November 5 which is nine months from now. Instead the duration of protection should be truncated into one week. As for one of Schneider's previous shows the episode guide and main page doesn't show a chance of being un-protected soon.
End of story,
47.16.146.238 (talk) 19:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) After looking at the block log, history and the talk page for edit requests I would recommend letting the block run its course. IP hasn't demonstrated a clear reason as to why the page needs to be unprotected other than the protecting admin currently is inactive since November 7. If an admin feels different I would strongly recommend suggesting replacing semi-protect with pending protection instead of a complete un-protect for this page. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The disruption in 2017 didn't strike me as likely to recur, and with the series almost over, I don't think it will be as trafficked as at the show's peak, so I think it is an unlikely vandalism target. Still, I've added pending changes for a month to see if things go okay. Being protected for two years is reason enough to try unprotecting. I would guess that 3 years wasn't chosen for a reason other than being a long time in the future. — Wug·a·po·des 06:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: - Persistent and continuous vandalism and disruptive editing by IP. Unexplained removal of content, sources and placing own deceptive material. Reoccurring issue. Oliszydlowski (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. SoWhy 10:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: There is an edit war going on that includes a racist edit summary. This is a second choice to a block of Velvet-twenties, per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Personal attacks in edit summaries by Velvet-twenties, which hasn't been dealt with in a timely fashion. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:16, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Withdraw. The abusive editor has been blocked, although I dont understand why the block was so short, but that means that this has been dealt with for now. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:21, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from an IP. King of Scorpions 21:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:26, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator EvergreenFir. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:51, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
12 March 2020
Semi-protection: A full day of crass IP vandalism from Special:Contributions/115.64.101.95 others have had to revert including BLP violations and posting with sources like "Celebrity Heights". Recommend striking the IPs edit summaries as well for BLP violations and blocking the IP. Isingness (talk) 03:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined since all of the recent vandalism is coming from a single source. How come none of you ever warned them or said anything on their talk page? I have given them an only warning. If they do it again, let me (or somebody) know so they can be blocked. Meanwhile I will see what needs to be revdel'ed. MelanieN (talk) 19:39, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP keeps on this for some reason. It's probable they can be blocked but otherwise this will work. Jorm (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Hut 8.5 22:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Disrutive IPs
- Hernanes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Alexandre Pato (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple IPs of blocked user repeatedly making unconstructive disruptive edits against consenus. ClocksFace (talk) 10:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The requester is a sock and properly blocked, but they were undoing the repeated longterm vandalism by IPs (presumably somebody else's socks). MelanieN (talk) 19:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:07, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, Cyberbot. My fault. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A WMF-banned user (Projects) keeps on reverting edits that removed their edits. Nigos (talk • Contribs) 12:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Continues abuse on the page with derogatory terms. The9Man | (talk) 12:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of promotional/unsourced material by newly-created WP:SPA accounts with obvious WP:COI. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator The Blade of the Northern Lights. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of persistent spam. Scaledish (Chances are I am wrong, sorry :blush:) (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page is being edited at an alarming rate due to current events. Lots of misinformation has been reverted but it is difficult for verified editors to keep up. This is related to the request to protect the main coronavirus article. Please follow related links (such as the outbreak article) and consider protecting those pages as well, where appropriate (cannot check right now, on mobile). 67.175.4.57 (talk) 05:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: (Non-administrator comment) adjusted formatting Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 16:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Iridescent. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly visible redirect, estimated 25k-400k pages link here, (the program I was using maxed out at 25k, probably MUCH more). Could be potentially damaging if this was vandalised. dibbydib 💬/✏ 07:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 19:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Content dispute. Please protect for a few days to force the editors to discuss on the article talk page. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- The most recent problem was due to a now-indeffed user. There is not quite enough trouble for indefinite semi although the article certainly has needed a lot or protection. Other admin opinions? Johnuniq (talk) 02:04, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Johnuniq: I know I'm not an admin but it seems this article does ok with pending changes protection enabled. I think indef pending changes protection would be suitable for this article and if vandalism ever becomes a burden on reviewers I'm sure one of them would come here to increase the protection to semi-protection. Just an idea. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 03:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Pending-changes protection working as intended. Lectonar (talk) 06:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Currently the page is unprotected, the last round of pending changes protection expired on March 7, 2020. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 16:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. I agree that indefinite PC is called for - considering the length of the protection log and the need to constantly re-impose protection when it expires. MelanieN (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Protection expired a few hours ago, completely predictable flood of vandalism. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 05:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Iridescent. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 18:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Previously protected, the subject of multiple vandalisms by an army of IPs. Perhaps a longer period is in order. Ifnord (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 16:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. JTP (talk • contribs) 02:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked., I blocked one account, for the rest it seems back to normal, no vandalism in the last several hours and several constructive IP edits.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:50, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing by socks/brand new accounts. ---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 11:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent vandalism over time by IPs or single-purpose accounts. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations from non-autoconfirmed users. 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D (talk) 05:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 08:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Conor McGregor (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Jon Jones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Remove protection Yea, so i look at the history. It seems fine to me before it protected. The non disruptive people are undoing changes to keep it under control without needing a lock.Regice2020 (talk) 05:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Goodnightmush: and @Graham87:, the respective protecting admins. Lectonar (talk) 06:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: I'm not really the original protecting admin for Jon Jones. As the log said, I was restoring semi-protection made to Jon Jones (fighter) by Horologium, before the semi-protection was effectively undone by a cut-and-paste move (see the log). For what it's worth I don't think high-profile articles about living people should be unsemi-protected without a very good reason, so I would be inclined to decline this request, but if another admin has a different view, they can feel free to unprotect the page anyway. Graham87 07:39, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: The two years of protection I set on Conor McGregor will end next week anyway. (I'm not optimistic it will be able to stay unprotected, though. That protection was needed within days after a previous one year protection.) GoodnightmushTalk 16:08, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Graham87: Sorry, didn't look down far enough, and obviousl didn't read properly to boot :). Fwiw, I agree insofar that I wouldn't unprotect completely, but a pending-changes trial is thinkable. Lectonar (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined We'll see what happens next week with the article where protection ends, and might extrapolate results for the other. I have watchlisted both. Lectonar (talk) 06:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 01:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @CLCStudent: I can't see problems warranting protection. The article has been protected a lot in the past so perhaps I'm missing it. Please post again with brief examples and explanation if there is a continuing problem. Johnuniq (talk) 02:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – nba suspends all games. https://www.cbssports.com/general/news/coronavirus-live-updates-nba-suspends-season-after-utah-jazz-player-tests-positive-for-covid-19/live/. Wylie39 (talk) 02:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Wylie39: Sorry but protection is not applied in anticipation of a problem. There are only three recent edits and they were by established editors and look ok. Johnuniq (talk) 02:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Crossroads -talk- 04:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Liz. Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 06:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – To prevent a potential edit war. Quahog (talk • contribs) 13:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Quahog: Sorry but protection comes after a discussion. You gave a good edit summary but please expand on that in a new section on the article talk (there is something there but it's old and incomplete). Post a friendly message on the IP's talk asking them to comment at [link to article talk]. Then notify me if they persist without discussion. Johnuniq (talk) 01:59, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. Paleontologist99 (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: Am I missing something? This has ten transclusions, and is hardly ever used. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Amorymeltzer: I checked as well and I saw only 10 transclusions which in my experience is never enough to be considered a high risk template. I personally don't think it warrants protection in accordance with the blocking policy and the fact there hasn't been any disruption to the template. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Johnuniq (talk) 02:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The IP address 117.242.135.242 is making changes to the template without discussing the rationale on the talk page. Requesting semi-protection for a month or two. AnjanBorah (talk) 16:14, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @AnjanBorah: Sorry but more than two unexplained edits are needed for protection. Please post on the template talk page explaining why the edits were not satisfactory, then post a friendly message on the IP's talk asking them to comment at Template talk:Assam History. Then notify me if they persist without discussion. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant spam by bots. Scaledish (Chances are I am wrong, sorry :blush:) (talk) 21:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There was a problem user yesterday, but they have been blocked. MelanieN (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Significant change undone. . Wilkn (talk) 12:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Discuss your disagreement on the talk page and do not edit war, MelanieN (talk) 00:45, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 01:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 02:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 18:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:12, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:47, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:13, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An Indonesian IP editor targets certain actors and changes their DOBs. This article has been their favorite target for the past couple of months, and they keep changing the DOB to be 30 years older. kyykaarme (talk) 23:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – One word: Vandalism. I'm not perfect but I'm almost (talk) 23:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 02:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pbrks (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – There is an edit war currently ongoing and it shows no signs of stopping. Could we have a few days of ext-con please?. Thepenguin9 (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Goodnightmush: Support. Flix11 (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. (Non-administrator comment) Fully protected for a period of 3 days please see here Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- User:Shirshkov999 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:Shirshkov999/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User:IgorS2019/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Remove protection Protected abandoned AfC drafts that cannot be nominated for G13 deletion as long as the protection is in place. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: the protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 06:41, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Lectonar, Done. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unprotected (Non-administrator comment) so bot will archive. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:21, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Someone please pay attention. This page is highly visible. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 16:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending Changes Protection: Resumption of disruptive IP editing, following previous protection. Recommending this level of protection to dissuade the problem. GUtt01 (talk) 10:26, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent WP:LIVESCORES violation by various IPs of VNPT from Binh Phuoc, Vietnam. Flix11 (talk) 12:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:52, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors, including one IP who mass-vandals touring articles. livelikemusic talk! 12:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Has been deleted as spam twice within the last month and a half. Hog Farm (talk) 13:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. If the person becomes notable, I think it's better the next account that tries to create it has to apply to an admin first. Bishonen | tålk 13:18, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Bishonen: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:29, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- There's only one page, and I did protect it. I'm writing to your owner, young bot. Bishonen | tålk 13:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC).
- Already done by administrator Bishonen. (Non-administrator comment) Just doing this as a technicality since the block log does reflect the page is create protected. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 01:00, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 18:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment:Doesn't he trust people any more? Aren't there an army of Wikipedians standing by to revert any potential vandalism to his page? 2600:1003:B853:A6B8:6429:52B8:E4A4:AFF2 (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already done by administrator HJ Mitchell. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: - IPs and new accounts are adding fake information and rumours. M4DU7 (talk) 07:42, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment This article now under Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions when writing a page about India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan (see WP:ARBIPA) so it is necessary for this article to be semi-protected. 36.77.94.26 (talk) 10:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 14:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 14:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)- Note: Either protection is open to review for appropriateness by any user and or admin, N.J.A. | talk 14:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @NJA: From my understanding of WP:ARBIPA and WP:ACDS extended confirmed protection is appropriate for this situation (if I am wrong please correct me). If an admin wants to use EC + PC I would recommend extending PC to two months that way IP and new accounts would need their edits reviewed after the EC ends. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 00:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP and newly created account making silly vandalisms. A short protection may encourage them to go play football or something for a while. Ifnord (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP/sock vandalism. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:18, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ministerboy (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ministerboy (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Ministerboy (talk) 00:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. S0091 (talk) 22:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
13 March 2020
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – Subject was already a controversial figure in English football and news has come out that he has contracted the novel coronavirus so he has apparently become a greater target. ECP might help to allow controlled addition of content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A very controversial figure in Australian politics, his article has been repeatedly vandalised, mostly by logged-out users. Some of the edits have been BLP policy violations. In breaking news, he's been diagnosed with the coronavirus - we've already got one IP editor vandalising his article just because of that. – numbermaniac 07:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Numerous problematic edits made by IPs, including but not limited to the nature of these ones within the past couple of months (since PC was instituted) [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32]. The ones I've highlighted, similar in nature, have been rejected by a number of editors, including me, yet the content gets restored somehow, almost unaltered, by IPs. I'm not exactly sure of the threshold of where PC doesn't work, and semiprotection would be needed, but I think this article is approaching it. . MPFitz1968 (talk) 21:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary or permanent pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This is a perennial target for commercial spam and fringe theories. It's hit infrequently, but endlessly, so pending changes would probably be best. It's been going on for years, actually, so long-term or even indef would be fine, though it hasn't been protected before. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 22:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
3 Months semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - Due a statement by one of the judges. Soubamcha
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:06, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term vandalism, most likely due to 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Short-term BLP violations/vandalism from a few different IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 19:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 09:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Eagles247. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 17:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Deletion of sourced material by dynamic IPs has been going on for a few weeks. McSly (talk) 19:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Extended confirmed protection for 6-9 months The COVID-19 pandemic article persistent sneaky driveby vandalism and disruptive editing simply being sneak in. Making it harder for us find possible disruption as this page drew more than 500K views. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:2019%E2%80%9320_coronavirus_pandemic#Vandalism Regice2020 (talk) 00:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment There seems to have content dispute of this page. Why that not fully-protected in a week and implement indefinite semi-protected instead. This article is not under discretionary sanctions unlike India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh specific article about the pandemic, as well as US and Eastern Europe-specific articles which under discretionary sanctions of their respective topics. 36.77.94.26 (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined. I'm not seeing the need for ECP (or full protection) at this time. The page is currently semi-protected until 19 April 2020. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: A youtube video was recently created about this subject. This has lead to a wave of adds of unsourced additions and claims and statements on the page that don't belong there. Sulfurboy (talk) 03:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Looks like there's also the possibility that a single user is abusing multiple accounts to bypass 3RR Sulfurboy (talk) 04:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. None of the problem accounts are extended confirmed, therefore, full protection seems excessive. Chetsford (talk) 05:48, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic by country and territory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. El_C 16:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: The main page needs full protection. - Littlecat, is your mailbox really in the wall? 10:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Isn't it already cascade protected, which prevents non admins from editing as well as other things? NonsensicalSystem(err0r?)(.log) 10:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Littlecat456: The main page is already fully protected. This request is in the unprotection section. The main page won't be unprotected either. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Zzuuzz: Oh. Okay. Well, I’ve ended my twinkle rollback spree, so I’m gonna be making Userboxes. My page if you wanna request one. (It’s the big blue button!) - Littlecat, is your mailbox really in the wall? 10:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 17:55, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – It looks like there might be need for extended confirmed due to recent edits from editors that are barely autoconfirmed. Dolotta (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Converted indef semi to indef ECP. It may need to be converted back after the latest batch of edits die down. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent vandalism/sock puppetry over the past few days (removing "operator" from the template), multiple IPs and new accounts. creffett (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Semi won't stop the autoconfirmed accounts, and it's easy enough to reduce the protection level later. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and serious BLP violations. Previous protection ended four days ago. Bwanter (talk) 10:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 10:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Editing wars on use of certain terminology. Refalm (talk) 18:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Refalm: I do not see a recent edit war. One IP edit was reverted while the few others in the last couple of weeks seem ok. Johnuniq (talk) 06:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 05:55, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @HueMan1: It's a new template which appears to have around 50 transclusions and that does not warrant protection. Please post again if the template becomes much more widely used. Johnuniq (talk) 06:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq: Sure, thanks! I'll keep an eye on it while it's unprotected. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Binksternet: I only see one IP edit this year. All other edits in 2020 appear to have been accepted. Johnuniq (talk) 06:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Syrian Civil War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring between users, some of which are also using IPs to edit. Greyjoy talk 15:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Greyjoy: I think this might not be needed now? The article was semi protected by another admin for a month, and at least one user has been indefinitely blocked. Johnuniq (talk) 06:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Meant to come and remove my request once it was sorted, that's what I get for editing instead of sleeping. Greyjoy talk 06:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonga (singer and producer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing of AFD by an IP (possibly author of article, logged out). Request semi-protection for remainder of AFD period. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Chetsford (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – TFA; the ten revisions while at TFA have resulted in no articles changes (all vandalism and reverting vandalism). I helped w/ the FA so not sure if it is okay for me to protect. Suggest 24 hours. Kees08 (Talk) 06:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:41, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:29, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Lots of unsourced edits regarding the recent cancellation of a Grand Prix (race) following a team's withdrawal. Numerous reverts visible in the page history. Admanny (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Edit: the cancellation just confirmed. Lots of unregistered edits are bound to come and mess things up. Please help. Admanny (talk) 23:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- It looks like good edits from IPs are coming in for the most part in recent edits. Does this still need protected? Kees08 (Talk) 06:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This duplicates an entry above. Johnuniq (talk) 06:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism; mass attack. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:36, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I guess a week semi-protection will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 16:09, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP's are continously removing {{sic}} and addition of unsourced, uncnfirmed matirial and removal of content support by sources.
SSSB (talk) 16:17, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 16:56, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:44, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:21, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The edit from IP 142.116.178.22 restoring content by banned sock puppets looks like ban evasion. This IP range was, in January, blocked for being used by sock puppet Sprayitchyo. His style was always to edit war, and the David Reich material he just tried to add is typical of him. Temp page semi protection will keep IP edit warring at bay. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 23:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. If more show up, let me know, and I'll semi-protect it. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:20, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: persistent vandalism and distruptive editing from IP. I also hope indefinite PC protection would ensure that situation 36.77.94.26 (talk) 00:25, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 05:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs adding possible defamatory content about the school, calling it a scam, etc. S0091 (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:19, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:39, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:16, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:18, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — LeoFrank Talk 15:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Please semi for at least a few weeks to keep sophomoric IPs from adding "online" to the lede and as many other places as they can think of. There have been about eight incidences in the past 12 hours. Thanks. Julietdeltalima (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – persistent anon vandalism. OhKayeSierra (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:22, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:29, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – University "online" vandalism. Julietdeltalima (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:10, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 00:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
14 March 2020
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism . Joeykai (talk) 14:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I know it' only just come off a protection, but there have been a whole two edits in that time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. S0091 (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--regentspark (comment) 19:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Editor2020 (talk) 02:52, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Pending changes is keeping it out of the live version and the rate of vandalism is not so high that we can't cope with it through normal methods. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection Additon of unsourced info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.57.43 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection Additon of unsourced info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.57.43 (talk • contribs) 03:19, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The Flight of Dragons and related
- The Flight of Dragons (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Dragon Knight (novel series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- The Dragon and the George (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism: A persistent dynamic IP editor comes back to these articles every so often and makes the same unconstructive edits to plot summaries and release dates. This has been going on for about 3 years. Some diffs: [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [[43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [[56] [57] [58]. Because of the long-term pattern, dynamic IPs, and the fact that weeks or months may pass between vandalisms (though it is clearly the same person), a long-term or possibly permanent semi may be warranted. I doubt a short semi will be effective in curbing the issue. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Although these edits are persistent, they're not frequent. The last 100 edits to those articles go a long way back (over three years in one case) so the disruption is not bad enough to justify shutting out all IPs and new accounts, especially not permanently. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP (and new accounts created solely to make one or two edits on this one article) vandalism. Davefelmer (talk) 17:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Malaysian political crisis and COVID-19 outbreak
- 2020 Malaysian political crisis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Socio-economic impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Pending changes protection: High level of IP vandalism. Dynamic IPs had persistently trying to link the two events together despite there is no source saying so and it is blatantly false. It has been going on for days and it only stop for a bit when I request page protection for the socio-economic impact article a few days ago but it started again after protection ended. I understand that page involving covid-19 incident has large amount of editors therefore requesting pending changes protection instead of semi-protection. Lulusword (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I delete the unrelated political events from the Socio-economic impact of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic article so I revert the unconstructive edits named by IP (182.1.58.201) which has owned by Telkomsel and return to that original version before edit by an IP 182. 36.77.92.39 (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days each, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'm loathe to protect articles on a fast-moving event like this for any longer but come back if the trouble resumes in three days and we can try another few days. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:57, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism due to a YouTube meme. OceanHok (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Inappropriate and inaccurate vandalism. Hoppeboy13 (talk) 21:49, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) @Hoppeboy13: I can tell you from experience and in accordance with the blocking policy that this request will be declined since administrators will not fully protect articles indefinitely. Are you wanting something like semi-protection which prevents unregistered (IP) and newly registered users from editing an article? Most of the recent edit history to this page is IP based. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 02:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, I only see disruptive edits by one IP.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Let's get these two editors to the talk page over discussions thur edits. Moxy 🍁 02:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I have warned both parties. Consider filing at WP:AN3 if it turns out that they won't follow the steps of dispute resolution. EdJohnston (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated removal of maintenance tags without explanation. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked., sorry.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – While the rate of contributions here is slow, most edits here are disruptive, usually being unsourced content changes. InvalidOStalk 12:34, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – consistent vandalism from IP address and adding unsourced information . Coderzombie (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent Vandalism from IP edits. Has continued every once a while. Anbans 585 (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Anbans 585: Sorry but admins here might not have a clue about the topic and it is not clear to me what the problem is. Please put an explanation at the article talk page as to why the IP's edits are being reverted and put a link to that section on their talk with a friendly request to discuss the issue. Post again if further problems. Johnuniq (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
The section knockout stage has a tournament bracket. The IP seems to randomly edit the bracket and add teams which didn't even participate in the tournament, let alone play in the knockout stages. Every edit by the IP seems to add a random set of teams and removes the original teams which actually played the knockout stages.--Anbans 585 (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Content dispute/edit warring – An inexperienced user has been adding unconstructive and disruptive information to the Lead. Please check edit history and make a decision. I would say I am quite involved with maintaining articles relating to McGill and created the page for the McGill School of Architecture, so it is important to me that this article maintains its GA status. Thank you. Jonahrapp (talk) 04:14, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Jonahrapp: Please see #McGill University a little higher on this page. You must discuss the issue on the article talk page which was last edited a month ago. Edit warring, even if correct, is not permitted and can result in blocks. Politely explain what the problem with the proposed changes is and engage the other editor. Johnuniq (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I did not realize there was a section on McGill above. I have since begun a discussion on the talk page for the article, however most of the discussion has already taken place between mine and User:Kupal123's own talk pages. I have reverted his edit twice and he has added three times. In order to avoid an official edit war, I am requesting this protection for the article and asking that someone else revert his edit so that I do not have to do it a third time and suffer the consequences. Please let me know. Jonahrapp (talk) 04:41, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. LakesideMinersCome Talk To Me! 16:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @LakesideMiners: There was too much lurid detail in that article and I think El_C was correct to remove it. Look at the percentage of the article devoted to the subject's accomplishments compared with the percentage devoted to intrusive details of her early life. The matter should be discussed at WP:BLPN. Johnuniq (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Random IP's constantly vandalizing the page, wiping content, etc. — LissanX (talk) 17:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @LissanX: Sorry but there has not been much recent activity and the edits are not clearly vandalism. Johnuniq (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: I feel like all well-known profiles should be protected against all types of deception such as vandalism, etc. I'm not saying that this has happened to this profile before, but I feel like we should protect theses profiles just in case. HelloItsKane (talk) 22:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @HelloItsKane: Sorry but there are no recent IP edits and the edits do not warrant protection. If there is something I'm missing, please let me know. Johnuniq (talk) 00:27, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruption by various IPs. FDW777 (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @FDW777: Sorry but protection is for obvious cases and I'm not going to protect an article proudly declaring that "Casey did not deny he had made the remarks nor did he apologise for the remarks". Please raise the issue at WP:BLPN or just refactor the text to something less gotcha. Johnuniq (talk) 23:42, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 00:51, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 3 months. Pretty bad stuff. EdJohnston (talk) 03:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Tamer Gunner, using IPs from Egypt. Binksternet (talk) 01:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 2 months. Socking is evident, but I only see IPs so far. Let me know if the problem becomes worse. EdJohnston (talk) 03:07, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruption by editor with dynamic IP, see Talk:National flag#Disruption by Vietnamese IP editor for details. FDW777 (talk) 07:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs every day since previous protection ended on March 1st. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:09, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:24, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 23:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP trolling going on. Probably best to semi this talk page for a week. Steel1943 (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:08, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:47, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Gotitbro (talk) 16:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Since the article was protected, the same activity has moved to the talk page over the last 48 hours, with various IPs and unconfirmed accounts. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 14:12, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Same user keeps claiming subject is not notable when subject is clearly notable for activism, according to the sources. The user is Special:Contributions/2001:8003:5022:5E01:CDC7:CB96:4FC9:0/64, most likely the same person as Special:Contributions/2001:8003:58A3:6C01:7CDF:8174::/64 who also repeatedly reverts edits. Ylevental (talk) 14:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Edits using shady sources are attributing Large Vitamin C doses as treatment for COV19 Rlazo (talk) 14:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I normally would not protect but precedent is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Please semi-protect Coronavirus disease 2019 (#Please semi-protect Coronavirus disease 2019permalink). Johnuniq (talk) 23:38, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Madbrad200 (talk) 11:27, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection. This article gets sporadically hit by IP socks of one disruptive user overwriting its content by that user's autobiography. This doesn't happen that frequently but then the article isn't very well watched either: the last disruption was from five days ago and that didn't get noticed until today. – Uanfala (talk) 12:01, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is difficult as there are lots of pages where disruption could occur, but in an effort to do something I protected. An edit filter might be needed if sufficiently widespread. Johnuniq (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and BLP violations from a few IPs. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:56, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:08, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent reversion of redirect despite content failing WP:NUMBER. Polyamorph (talk) 14:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Johnuniq (talk) 23:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. Trailblazer101 (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 22:15, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, whereas 6there is indeed (not unexpectedly) quite some vandalism at this talk page, it has high traffic and many editors watch it, so they can remove vamdalism. On the other hand, it is important that non-autoconfirmed users can comment and, in particular, place edit requests at the talk page.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonsense related to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Cross-article university vandalism. Should be over in a few weeks. —[AlanM1 (talk)]— 07:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:31, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Look likes a tag-team actively vandalising the article. A week semi-protection will be enough to spoil the fun. The Banner talk 09:35, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - People are actively vandalising the page due to some controversial statement from his spouse. A week semi-protection would be enough. - The9Man | (talk) 11:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:14, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 23:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Increase in protection level: Persistent attempts to add nonsense about dog milk to template by IP editor. oknazevad (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
15 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Part of a trio of pages that have been consistently disruptively edited by successive sockpuppets. One of them, Y-DNA haplogroups by ethnic group, was already protected. David Brooks (talk) 02:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Part of a trio of pages that have been consistently disruptively edited by successive sockpuppets. One of them, Y-DNA haplogroups by ethnic group, was already protected. David Brooks (talk) 02:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:22, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – Many IPs changing year of birth, which is referenced in the article as 1975, and confirmed by online birth records check. Binksternet (talk) 02:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: @Binksternet: The birth date of January 7, 1975 is supported by ref 1 but I cannot see any mention of DoB in that. Primary sources should not be used so if there is no satisfactory reliable source, the date should be removed. Johnuniq (talk) 03:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- The reference says he was 39 in 2014, which is all I am concerned with for this Wikipedia article. I only checked online birth records to see for myself. Binksternet (talk) 03:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- I missed that. The template (in the infobox) should be {{Birth year and age}}. Nevertheless, the reference is rather weak (they could easily have messed up the age which is just a by-the-way in the article) and if nothing better is available, I would be inclined to remove it as experience shows that persistent "corrections" to a birth date can be an indication of a problem with the data, regardless of what might be found in a primary source. Of course IPs might also be trolling but in both cases, removing a weakly sourced date might be best. At any rate, I'll leave this for others to consider. Johnuniq (talk) 04:18, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- The reference says he was 39 in 2014, which is all I am concerned with for this Wikipedia article. I only checked online birth records to see for myself. Binksternet (talk) 03:05, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't see any attempt to discuss this on the talk page, but that's where it belongs. MelanieN (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: The lead of this article has been subject to multiple edit wars in the last few days, mostly involving inexperienced users. Discussions have been brought up in the article's talk page, however certain users are misinterpreting certain aspects of the discussion/consensus. What prompted the first discussion was whether to include the year the first degree was awarded, which led to a consensus that "firsts" of the university's development post-establishment should not be included, i.e. first degree awarded, first chancellor, first academic unit, first building etc. however one user believes that this encompasses every "first," including the university being the "oldest in Montreal and one of the first to be established in Canada." As such, they are undoing my own edits which include this information, which I feel is important and does belong in the lead (see FA status article, Dartmouth College for one reference I am basing my edits on). Please let me know. Thank you. Jonahrapp (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 18:18, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The book draws some parallels to the recent and ongoing COVID-19 virus outbreak, I believe that there is a possibility of it being vandalized or edited to include false and or defamatory information ie conspiracy theories. The page has been protected but the protection has timed out, I believe that it should be extended.
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Resumption of disruptive editing by IPs. Temp protection needed to dissuade it. GUtt01 (talk) 12:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:45, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BMX . IanDBeacon (talk) 18:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected. Reinstating indef semi after expiration of temporary ECP. Favonian (talk) 18:56, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Upcoming TV show with high level of IP vandalism/false changes to cast list every few days. Protection just expired and the same vandalism has already happened. TheFallenPower (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:29, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. IanDBeacon (talk) 02:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. The need for indefinite protection was predicted by the last admin to protect, and I agree. MelanieN (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Beginning three days ago with this edit, a series of six IPs and two registered accounts have been vandalizing the article by trying to claim Temple University is an online university. Many colleges and universities have gone to online teaching temporarily due to the Covid-19 situation. None of this makes any of them an online only college/university, as is the implication with this vandalism. --Hammersoft (talk) 03:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:54, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – increased visibility as a result of outbreak. Will120 (talk) 03:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP sock keeps changing sourced content. -. LouisAragon (talk) 03:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Same IP sock changing sourced content as on the Commagene page. -. LouisAragon (talk) 03:50, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator MelanieN. Favonian (talk) 18:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Effect | Pages | % |
---|---|---|
No TOC | 641,948 | 88.33% |
Standard {{Category TOC}} | 73,934 | 10.17% |
{{Large category TOC}} | 10,841 | 1.49% |
Total | 726,723 | |
Template-protection: High use template. I have just created it as a sub-page of the template-protected Template:CatAutoTOC, which is used on over 190,000 pages. When the templates have purged, this sub-template will have the same usage level. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:42, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done [59] by User:MusikBot II. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent IP to include unsourced or unreliable sales figures. robertsky (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. Favonian (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BF101. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: The same BLP vios that resulted in two previous partial protections are continuing, by ips and established editors. I've requested help at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Ja'Net_DuBois with no response yet. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 19:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- We need at least partial protection for the ips. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 22:35, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:13, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BF101. IanDBeacon (talk) 19:44, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Kingdom of Commagene and Antiochus I Theos of Commagene
- Kingdom of Commagene (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Antiochus I Theos of Commagene (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Constant ethno-nationalistic disruption. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Applies to both. MelanieN (talk) 18:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BF101. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:46, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. This used to have indefinite protection, but it was removed a few months ago. I think it still needs it. MelanieN (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – WP:LTA/BF101. IanDBeacon (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. AustralianRupert (talk) 07:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: subject of increased traffic, misinformation added fueled by false stories. Please semi-protect for a month. --bender235 (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Due to the high popularity of Italy’s Prime Minister in the wake of the national Coronavirus crisis, vandalism has greatly increased. Please increase protection level accordingly.Isananni (talk) 22:38, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 01:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: vandalism has resumed when last protection expired. MarnetteD|Talk 01:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Dreamy Jazz --Info-Screen::Talk 01:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
16 March 2020
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip users keep adding unconstructive contents to the article without any further discussion. I think this article needs to be semi-protected to keep these ip users out. . Jeff6045 (talk) 13:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Already protected by me independent of this report. El_C 22:31, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and edit warring; non-users changing section titles with no justification provided. Ongoing semi-protection needed given it is unknown how much longer market turbulence will last. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 20:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator RegentsPark. El_C 22:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The same nonsense began within 20 hours of the lifting of the previous protection: IP users, clearly socks of User:Drewpalazzolo, are mucking about with the article, going on somewhat incoherently and aimlessly about bullies and about how antagonists are neutral characters and so forth. Largoplazo (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Not this again. El_C 22:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP keeps editing that I have a WP:COI with this individual, I had never personally spoken with him Ylevental (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Please continue to discuss in your report at WP:AN3 which is about the same issue. It is unnecessary to file the same issue at two different boards. The AN3 admins can issue protection if it is needed. EdJohnston (talk) 15:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High-profile trade rumors today. Can’t even tell where the last good version is. . Larry Hockett (Talk) 17:43, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:15, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Eagles 24/7 (C) 18:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Going as far back as June 2019, an IPv6 user has been editing the navbox to place all the games in the Forza series under one "Games" group instead of the two separate groups, one for the Motorsport for the sub-series and one for the Horizon sub-series. The reason why the series' games are organized into separate groups in the navbox rather than one "Games" group is because it's easier to organize and navigate, both when viewing the navbox and when editing it, and it reduces the size of the template by (based on most of the IP user's edits) 66 bytes. This is primarily from removing the extraneous instances of the words "Motorsport" and "Horizon" in display, which becomes harder to read under the single-group version that the IP user prefers when as group goes back and fourth between the entries in the two sub-series. Yet despite the quick edit summary explanations from myself and TheDeviantPro (who first undid the IP user's edits) as to why the separation of sub-series is superior, the IP user doesn't care and continues to edit the navbox to their preferred "everything under one group" version. –WPA (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 3 months. This protection might be lifted if the IP will join discussions and agree to accept consensus. EdJohnston (talk) 15:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. MRRaja001 (talk) 12:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 12:37, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protection: 41,000 transclusions, and growing. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protection: 12,000 transclusions, and growing. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Generally a salted article, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kyle Kulinski. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 08:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined The draft has been kept, so no need to salt the article for now, as there was no attempt to create it under this title in mainspace yet. Kyle Kulinski is already salted. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit war involving repeated addition of extraenous plot details. Blake Gripling (talk) 11:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:14, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
1 Year anniversary of his egging incident and declared bankruptcy on 2020-03-16. Page has already been vandalized twice
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 01:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: IP hopper repeatedly edit warring with editors over applying a qualifier to "pain." Matter was addressed on the talk page. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 01:40, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. SangrurUser (talk) 05:54, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 10:07, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Two users involving in edit warring and content dispute since 14 March. Full protection would be helpful for them taking their concerns to the talk page. Also, please restore the revision before their edits. Article history has become a mess. Wario-Man (talk) 07:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:41, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator EdJohnston. MelanieN (talk) 02:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 01:38, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:56, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Long-term semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Dynamic IP edit warring an unduly prominent Jewish Museum section. Edit history shows this has been going on since 2014 (after trying and failing to describe Cohen as Jewish in the lead). Lord Belbury (talk) 09:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by unregistered users. User:SubZeroSilver (talk) 14:02, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:30, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced content by IPs. Luigitehplumber (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: protect my page. Natadmim (talk) 20:43, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined No need. As a userpage it is in effect semi-protected automatically. MelanieN (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Xenophobia and racism related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Because of many other coronavirus related pages being vandalized it may not be a bad idea to protect this one. There is a high risk of vandalism on this page. Dellwood546 (talk) 04:03, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I see a few problem edits, but the majority of edits by anonymous users are constructive. If that situation changes, ask again. MelanieN (talk) 20:33, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Short-term temporary Semi-protection: Recent uptick in disruptive edits by unregistered users. Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 04:54, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:35, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – To protect from vandalism because someone deleted the last page I created from official source. Kreshnik Prizreni (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced and copied content. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 21:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is partly a content dispute, but I do not see any attempt by editors to discuss their differences on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 23:17, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Maybe semi-protect for two days. An IP keeps removing material and adding unsourced material about family and so on. The IP was warned, but the IP was not blocked. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Disruptive editing. Crboyer (talk) 22:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blatant vandalism by IP hopper. . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:34, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:52, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 16:39, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, adding defamatory and disruptive content. Please make sure to undo any more vandal edits before protecting. 2409:4073:413:967D:BD6E:2AF9:1E6D:BA67 (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous disruptive editing and vandalism among IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, IP hopping from same range. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 20:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. The page used to be indefinitely semi-protected. That protection was removed last year as a test. Looks to me like the test has failed and the article still needs indefinite protection. MelanieN (talk) 23:07, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page has been vandalized by IP users several times and is about a sensitive topic. . Dellwood546 (talk) 22:19, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:11, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
17 March 2020
Move-protection: Current back-and-forth moves happening. Probably best to protect from that at the moment. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 15:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Could do with semi-protect also. Govvy (talk) 16:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: (Non-administrator comment) Since a consensus in favour of the original title emerged on the talk page, the page has been moved just twice (ie. once to a new title and then back again). While there have been a number of editors changing the dates in the article, there has been no vandalism or edit warring on the page. I wonder if an edit notice might be a more effective way to help new users who want to update the article for now. WJ94 (talk) 16:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Also editors are changing the content so protection for new and unconfirmed for a week would be appreciated. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ivanvector. Refers to move protection. MelanieN (talk) 20:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent IP vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brojam (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Long term disruption by multiple disposable accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sockpuppetry. One master is range-blocked. The other is IP hopping after each block. Edit warring at the moment. Some 90% of edits this year have been from socks. Some other Big Boss pages have already been protected due to socking/disruptive editing. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:49, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Dee03 15:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs and newly registered accounts vandalising the page. well-meaning registered editors have mistakenly revert to vandalised versions made by newly registered accounts. robertsky (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ohnoitsjamie.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Unconfirmed Twitter gossip that subject has died. 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:CD3C:B645:5764:D8C1 (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Mattythewhite.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Brihaspati (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent single IP vandalism . King of Scorpions 17:55, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism in light of his role in the UK's response to the coronavirus. ns_2 (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Someone involved with the club copying material (they claim they wrote) from the club website into the article (which includes gems like "Ironically, our current ground..."). Number 57 19:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – New user not getting it and reading their talk page. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 01:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection New editor keeps adding the same erroneous, uncited, material to the lead paragraph, in spite of attempts to explain on Talk page why the information is incorrect. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 13:02, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 14:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Socks of User:Karmaisking have been targeting this more aggressively of late, asking for semi-protection to block their disruption. Ravensfire (talk) 17:23, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Appears recently that only one account was causing disruption, and it is now blocked. Re-report if required, N.J.A. | talk 13:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated disruptive editing, addition of unsourced info, and vandalism. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 15:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and addition of erroneous info. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protection: 49,000 transclusions, and growing. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:10, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Misinformation related to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite move protection: Highly visible page – The page has been moved several times without discussion. Please ping me if further justification or explanation is needed. - MrX 🖋 10:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: (Non-administrator comment) Page is currently semi-protected, only autoconfirmed editors can edit or move the page. Page is not move protected. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 13:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Move protected indefinitely.. El_C 16:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Pat Day page: somebody has done a character assassination piece on Pat Day and has deleted all of my edits to stop his hateful and disgusting attempts to make the page a one-sided attack on a Hall of Fame jockey. Every time I post the positive accomplishments of Pat Day it is removed and is replaced with his mean-spirited, one-sided and misleading comments. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.212.25 (talk • contribs) 23:04, March 13, 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @71.215.212.25: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Fixed formatting for bot I thought I had it fixed the first time Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 09:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done (Non-administrator comment) Content dispute anyway, page not protected this is not the correct venue for this. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 09:08, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistant change of settlement type from Town to City, despite what has been said in the Census source. Also IP hopper keeps on adding unsourced name. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, also some range blocks tried , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 13:41, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection Persistent vandalism almost immediately after expiration of previous protection, from multiple IPs. Since it's a category page and really shouldn't be edited much anyway, could probably be indefinitely semi'd. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:45, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. N.J.A. | talk 13:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – You probably know why this page is getting wrecked (1/2 goodfaith, but still unsourced or incorrect), some of them might have slipped in too. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 06:33, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. (Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 13:53, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A one year block for vandalism on this article expired Jan 31. Vandalism resumed immediately. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator El C. Now on indefinite semi-pp, which seems appropriate given the previous long-term protection. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an editor appears to have been creating new accounts to modify the article without discussion or explanation (other than an f-u to me). I would not object to ECP. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:07, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ECP would probably be disproportionate since none of the problematic edits come from editors who reached the stage of being autoconfirmed. If vandalism continues while under semi-pp, then ECP or PC might be appropriate. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent unconstructive IP edits. KyleJoantalk 06:43, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. LG-Gunther : Talk 23:21, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 03:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sid95Q (talk) 14:46, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Daily addition of the same unsourced info by different IP address in the same range so likely the same person. Robvanvee 07:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Abiy Ahmed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: the person in the article is very controversial and famous within nationwide in Ethiopia and other regions. There is numerous vandalism including changing valid date of birth, ethnic bias that the person haven't. The editor disrespects the WP:POV. The Supermind (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Rupaul's Drag Race
'Contestant progress' tables section for:
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 3) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 4) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 5) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 8) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 9) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 10) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- RuPaul's Drag Race (season 11) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent, superfluous and disruptive edits by non-autoconfirmed users; causing damage to pages that have been fine for years for no good reason. Season 7 is extended protected for this reason. Ellis.o22 (talk) 05:27, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. At first, I protected the first two, but as I looked through the rest it seems that this is a multi-page content dispute. Consensus can change and protection shouldn't be used to get the upper hand in editorial disputes. — Wug·a·po·des 00:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 19:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Report was good, but looks stale now. — Wug·a·po·des 00:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism...currently on MAINPAGE MONGO (talk) 04:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 05:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Highly visible page; IPs adding unsourced content and self-reverting their edits. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Can I include its templates? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing from IPs. 2409:4073:2003:1BA4:ACA9:76A3:42E1:A390 (talk) 14:30, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Repeated edits by IP users which remove factual, cited information re: the subject of the article citing only "false information" or "fake news." RexSueciae (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days , after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Edit warring over whether to include a particular item or not. I don't see any discussion of the subject on the talk page. That's where it belongs. MelanieN (talk) 03:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated removal of sourced content without discussion. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 19:58, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. El_C 22:42, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Not much vandalism . Natadmim (talk) 13:59, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected. Not in itself an argument. Lack of vandalism merely demonstrates the effectiveness of protection. Favonian (talk) 14:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Not much vandalism . Natadmim (talk) 14:01, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected. Same as for "Kitten" above. Favonian (talk) 14:52, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Not much vandalism . Natadmim (talk) 14:04, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected. Same as for "Kitten" above. Favonian (talk) 14:53, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 00:52, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – This should be decreased to permanent template-protection. Full protection is overkill. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is also a weird page, and should likely be moved to Template:Featured list tools. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:25, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done Page was protected before TPE existed, so no concerns lowering to template protection since this is the main use case. — Wug·a·po·des 00:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears disgruntled students are vandalizing the oage over the unsw policy on covid19. I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 21:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator NinjaRobotPirate. — Wug·a·po·des 00:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
18 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ESPN made a simulation of the tournament which Wisconsin won.. now it's a sort of meme that Wisconsin actually won the national championship. There are screenshots of the vandalism on Twitter, which brought me here. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 14:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Recently mentioned in the news (invoked by Trump regarding Coronavirus). Starting to experience vandalism. fintler (talk) 16:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Endorse TS-P. I Twinkled the same request which noted the duplicate. I note that some of the vandalism doesn't jump out at you, for instance the most revcent event was an alteration of the effective date of the law. I just happened to note "1920" did not make sense for a Truman-era statute. TJRC (talk) 22:44, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Having just come off of semi on March 4, the same issue of an anon continuously adding then removing the same trivial material has resumed. While the net effect is no change to the article, the behavior is annoying and clogging up the edit history with pointless edits of material that has been rejected as trivial by consensus. oknazevad (talk) 20:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:56, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done--Ymblanter (talk) 21:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent logo-erasing vandalism by IPs from Croatia. Flix11 (talk) 15:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - 2 months. A dispute about the team's logo was previously reported at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. IceWelder [✉] 16:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- This needs to be handled urgently, the page is drowning in vandalism. Two-weeks minimum until the cancellation of the 2020 contest has settled. IceWelder [✉] 19:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Agreed, this needs to be handled soon. Paintspot Infez (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Ferret. (Non-administrator comment) Semi-protected for a period of 14 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 20:18, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Dirkbb (talk) 16:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Drmies. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 20:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: This page was indef protected more than one ago but it is not a type of page that is likely to be frequently vandalized. I also asked the protecting admin but they say to be very busy IRL and get a lot of messages so it could take quite a long time. Thank you 176.147.224.55 (talk) 08:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined This should be in the "requests for reduction" just below but I'm not worried about that. I am declining because the very few IP edits on the talk page in the last few years look like vandalism. If there were one or two reasonable edit requests, unprotection might be worthwhile. Johnuniq (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- I wanted to ad that the mole-rat's longevity is about ten times longer than that of an ordinary rat or mouse (see section "Longevity"). 176.147.224.55 (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- You can make an edit-request on the talk-page of the article. Lectonar (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- It seems OK, but what if nobody sees the request? 176.147.224.55 (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- @176.147.224.55: I can assure you someone will see it. As long as you follow the instructions over at WP:ER and include a reliable source your edit request will be answered. For example I patrol edit requests for extended-confirmed and semi-protected pages daily so I can assure you it will be seen. But please be patient with us due to the COVID-19 pandemic there is an influx of requests and we currently have a backlog but are working on them as quick as possible. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 10:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- It seems OK, but what if nobody sees the request? 176.147.224.55 (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- You can make an edit-request on the talk-page of the article. Lectonar (talk) 09:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- I wanted to ad that the mole-rat's longevity is about ten times longer than that of an ordinary rat or mouse (see section "Longevity"). 176.147.224.55 (talk) 09:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: plenty of IP vandalism over the last week.BabbaQ (talk) 10:49, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. One disruptive IP today, one yesterday. No edits for a week before that. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 11:03, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Currently a spam magnet - almost all non-AC edits in the past month have been to replace refs with spam or blogs. creffett (talk) 13:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending-changes protection. Persistent additions of non-notable subjects. Page is getting filled with article requests with no provided sources. Mgasparin (talk) 20:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Mgasparin: I see no discussion at WT:Requested articles/Arts and entertainment indicating any support for protection, and I cannot see any recent examples of edits being reverted. At any rate, pending changes would impose a double burden where every addition needs to be approved or rejected—just reverting would be easier if necessary. Johnuniq (talk) 08:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I realize talk pages don't get protected too often, but there's an ongoing RM discussion that's going off the rails. It's bad enough that old accounts are coming out of the woodwork, but there's suddenly a ton of IPs as well, probably canvassed/socks. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:42, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined The edits since the request was made appear to be from autoconfirmed editors. Johnuniq (talk) 08:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Edit link now visible from Wikipedia:Community portal so lets match protection levels. No need for IP access. . Moxy 🍁 07:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 13:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Elizium23 (talk) 19:39, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Elizium23 (talk) 19:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/styles.css (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended confirmed: Match protection level with Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors, by way of adding repeated unsourced and/or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 21:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There's has been an editor who is using multiple accounts for disruptive editing by keep moving around album credits without explaining why. The edits have been reverted several times now but the editor keep coming back with another account to restore the edits. This have been happening throughout the month of March of this year. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip addresses have been continuously vandalizing the article non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 05:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent vandalism. Paleontologist99 (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive editing; an increase in protection would be most appropriate. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We have to proceed slowly and try one week first (as well as the existing pending changes). Johnuniq (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors, by way of adding repeated unsourced and/or poorly sourced content. livelikemusic talk! 21:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – There's has been an editor who is using multiple accounts for disruptive editing by keep moving around album credits without explaining why. The edits have been reverted several times now but the editor keep coming back with another account to restore the edits. This have been happening throughout the month of March of this year. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various ip addresses have been continuously vandalizing the article non-stop. — YoungForever(talk) 05:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:43, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – frequent vandalism. Paleontologist99 (talk) 05:12, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term disruptive editing; an increase in protection would be most appropriate. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 08:46, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We have to proceed slowly and try one week first (as well as the existing pending changes). Johnuniq (talk) 08:53, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:48, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page-move vandalism. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:17, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator SQL.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
*Automated comment: @Ymblanter: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, I see, it is ec protected but not move protected. Possibly the protection is not needed since the vandal only moved the page once and is currently blocked anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 20:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some disruptive editing/BLP violations from new editors and IP. -- LuK3 (Talk) 01:36, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:09, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 06:24, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing. A seasonal stream of Ukrainian editors who again discovered that subject is described in Britannica ss Ukrainian-born and will show up in large numbers until the article has been protected. A week should help. Thanks.Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And see my comment on the talk page. MelanieN (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editor again putting in material there is a consensus not to have. This page should be indefinitely protected. It has been page protected three times in the last three years and for up to a year at least twice. Shortly after the protection ends, the IP returns. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:28, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Acroterion. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 05:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs/newly registered editors. A few months would be preferable. . Tutelary (talk) 06:40, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: The event has been postponed but not renamed, yet some editors are applying WP:OR to change the name. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Several IPs keep adding false death toll numbers despite the references cited and despite the fact that the family of the supposedly deceased person said he was still alive. Davidmejoradas (talk) 21:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: level of IP vandalism. I STRONGLY URGE TO PROTECT HER. It is already really fucked up!Jimi Henderson (talk) 23:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:37, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
19 March 2020
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Page has been subject to extensive sock puppetry from a Urdu/Pakistan POVPUSHER through multiple IPs and socks (see SPI, extensive discussion on the user). This requires EP at this point. Gotitbro (talk) 12:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. Disruption began almost immediately after the last 6 months of protection expired, so hopefully an indef will discourage the puppeteer from simply waiting around for protection to expire. I'm not sure if ECP is needed just yet, but if problems occur despite the semi-protection let me or another admin know and it can be raised. — Wug·a·po·des 20:36, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Multiple violations of WP:NOTNEWS. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined edits are not bad faith; I'm not sure protection is the best way to handle this. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/United States medical cases (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – It's hard to revert edits and there is a lot of data rapidly changing and it's hard to keep sources straight when IP users can just enter random shit into the table. MosquitoBird11 (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as a general sanction. The template needs to be stable and accurate. — Wug·a·po·des 20:47, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/United States medical cases chart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Editors persistently ignore the comments and source indicated and their edits must be reverted to maintain the stability of the template. MosquitoBird11 (talk) 20:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as a general sanction. The template needs to be stable and accurate. — Wug·a·po·des 20:47, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Articles related to 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic
- 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Coronavirus disease 2019 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Morocco (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed: Content dispute – Subjected to that sources might be unreliable, see WP:RSPSOURCES. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined a certain amount of disruption is inevitable on high-profile articles about current events. If it's unmanageable, I'd suggest starting a discussion at AN or ANI before any admin applies ECP to a broad group of popula articles. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:03, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandal came back with a new IP directly after beeing blocked. Info-Screen::Talk 14:47, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Watchlisted though. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP hopper constantly editing against MOS:TV despite being reverted by multiple editors. TheDoctorWho (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. By Geni. This affects multiple articles so blocking is probably preferable. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:09, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. Moxy 🍁 11:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined for the same reason as last time. It's only one editor. Try discussion, or failing that warning and ultimately reporting to a relevant noticeboard. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – Requesting protection of prevent a widening move-war. Given that two editors have decided to move this article to draft, it should be protected as a draft and probably vetted by AfC. SamHolt6 (talk) 11:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Subject to IP vandalism i.e. fans angry at the ending of the 12th series of Doctor Who and complaining that the show was ruined. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 13:32, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: IP vandalism (per DS remedies explanation on article's talk page) from multiple IPs over last few days. Pinchme123 (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/United Kingdom medical cases chart (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Please consider for semi-protection, this is a fast changing and highly viewed template with multiple IPs making updates with every new twitter post. Thanks |→ Spaully ~talk~ 15:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing. IanDBeacon (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. N.J.A. | talk 11:36, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full create protection: Please protect so that this page can only be created by administrators. --Killarnee (T•1•2) 12:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Sokolokondo (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeted by an LTA. DannyS712 (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 07:01, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Imho a bit too early for full protection: let's see if the discussion on the talk-page gets traction. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 07:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 07:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:53, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Very repeated protections, including one instance for three years and another for two years, have failed to curb vandalism. Jasper Deng (talk) 08:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IPs and new users. Flix11 (talk) 06:57, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Sportsman involved in recent off field controversy. Article receiving persistent IP edits attempting to blank content, including making legal threats. . Jevansen (talk) 07:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This is rather slow, pending-changes should do the trick for now. Lectonar (talk) 07:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: The help me template is semi-protected, so this template being template protected does not make sense. KylieInTheSkylie (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @KylieInTheSkylie: The current protection makes sense because {{help me}} exists in very few pages. That is because it is replaced with {{help me-helped}} when answered. There are over 12,000 transclusions of the latter and that number will continue to grow. Johnuniq (talk) 03:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: I'd consider protecting it to SysOp or at least full due to the page being a bot shutoff page. KylieInTheSkylie (talk) 20:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @KylieInTheSkylie: I have no idea whether a shutdown page is normally protected, but this one has been semi-protected for a long time. Please start a discussion somewhere about the advisability of protecting this page and post again if consensus supports it. Johnuniq (talk) 02:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi protection: Paristiant addition of unsourced content. My previous attempt to protect this got rejected, but the IP user doing it won't stop adding in fake English dub dates into the page, as nothing has been confirmed yet. Luigitehplumber (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @LTPHarry: I can see that protection is probably required but we have to go through the standard procedures–there is nothing about the issue on article talk and there is nothing on the IP's talk. Please put a friendly explanation on article talk and a friendly link to that on the IP's talk, inviting them to join the discussion. If there is still a problem in a few days, post again. Johnuniq (talk) 02:50, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Block evasion by someone with a fascination for Rocky Marciano's statue and Joe Stalin. Really. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 00:02, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined It looks like the offending IP has been blocked and an admin has removed the material with a convincing edit summary. Please notify me or post again if the problem continues. Johnuniq (talk) 02:55, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Requesting a temporary protection on this page as I just reverted 1 bout of vandalism. I normally don't request this for 1 bout but the content was beyond the pale especially for a page about a children's program. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 20:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Alucard 16: I indefinitely blocked the editor and I think that might solve the problem. Please post again if problems continue. Johnuniq (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption, continuing after a COI account received a two year block. Polishing the bio for positive spin. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Something has happened for multiple IP editors to target his article. Thepenguin9 (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- That's not vandalism, it just needs a source. – bradv🍁 05:30, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh wait, some of it is. Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – bradv🍁 05:32, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. — TAnthonyTalk 22:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. Sokolokondo (talk) 00:48, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:56, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs using the page to promote business activities of Helbiz. Mr. Vernon (talk) 01:05, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:21, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by one or more unregistered editors using different IP addresses. Article has been previously protected twice in the past month, each time for one week, but the vandalism continues once the protection expires so please protect for longer i.e., 3 months. ElKevbo (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Caste warrior blanking chunks of article: bizarre obsession with people eating (or not eating, as the case maybe) fish. ——SN54129 17:34, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Blocked by User:ToBeFree about ten minutes later :) ——SN54129 20:07, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, there was a protection request as well. Hmm. I can't rule out the sockpuppetry scenario but would wait to see who makes which edits next. Do feel free to protect the page to prevent further disruption. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There were a lot more problem editors than just that one, and over a considerable period of time. MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated vandalism and disruptive editing by anonymous users despite previous protections. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 19:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:31, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A page called Shiv Ram Singh Inter College has been extremely vandalized. Please request you to secure this page soon. Vivek ji123 (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – 3 days, though it may eventually need to be 3 weeks. We have multiple IPs and one (likely clone) editor Misa.tomasev changing season rankings on a season the ATP has frozen in place for 6 weeks. Summaries aren't working. The registered editor has been warned. Fyunck(click) (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:02, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs and users, likely to go on due to connection with the ongoing Coronavirus outbreak in the media. Gotitbro (talk) 17:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Multiple IPs starting December 22, 2019 have been adding Raini Rodriguez as a main cast member. Support is a reused reference that is currently a dead link. She has never been in this show, nothing in IMDb for show or actress support that, and was in the main cast of Austin & Ally at the time so cannot have been in this series. There is a strange campaign of vandalism, usually mocking her weight, by some IPs, this looks to be a continuation. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
20 March 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly targeted by vandalism, disruptive editing and BLP violations. Erik (トークページ) 10:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been a lot of disagreeable edits in the lead section in recent days. Nerd271 (talk) 14:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 19:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated addition of multiple unsourced genre's. Robvanvee 18:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Was nominated for speedy deletion & vandalized by Prezbbmtheone and new IP vandalism just today. Article has also been subject to IP vandalism for the past few months. — Emperork (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 18:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term non-autoconfirmed vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 18:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 12:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 18:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Edits by IPs are split between constructive and disruptive due to recent events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Likely collateral damage as one or several users who are making improvements would be affected by the requested protection. Exactly. And the frequency of edits is not that high yet. Lectonar (talk) 07:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This and Summer Helene have been deleted three times total since 2017 for advertising and copyright violations, and twice more in 2008. The author who uploaded the page said they are only allowed to post the copyvio advertising bio by the client: "The Bio used was created by her previous publicist and she has asked that we use only that bio." (The fact that they've alternated publishing to these two pages several times makes me wonder if this isn't an attempt to make the repeated deletions harder to spot rather than a mistake.). Blythwood (talk) 12:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Create protection: Repeatedly recreated – As above. Blythwood (talk) 12:48, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Creation protected Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence. It's just upper and lower case, and not everyone is aware of our policies etc. Lectonar (talk) 12:58, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. The4lines (talk) 21:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This article experiences an extraordinary level of IP vandalism. As it is the first surah of the Quran and one of the most important ones, it experiences frequent disruptive editing by IP's who inject their formatting errors, POV, inaccurate content, false translations, etc. into the article. Just the last couple of edits are insertions of honorifics. — LissanX (talk) 03:01, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined First, those edits are few and far between, and sometimes the article goes weeks without edits at all. Second, adding honorifics is not vandalism; we can't expect every person editing Wikipedia to know about formatting or our sometimes labyrinthine rules. Lectonar (talk) 07:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IceWelder [✉] 05:42, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 05:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Unprotection: Draft:Cambium Networks may soon be ready for mainspace. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:08, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined And it may not. Let AfC play out. It'll be unprotected if it's accepted. – Muboshgu (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, Afaik, there is no way to approve it unless the page protection is removed. I'm also an AfC reviewer and would approve it if I currently could, I phrased it as "may soon" in case another editor came to it first before I noted the protection removed. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: if it is okay could I recommend an alternate proposal? How about lowering the protection level down 1 step from full to extended confirmed? After looking at the draft so far the two AfC reviewers GSS and Sulfurboy are extended-confirmed. I can watchlist the draft so if it is moved to mainspace by an ECP editor without completing the AfC process I'll move it back and request the full protection be reinstated. As an NPR I wouldn't recommend a complete unprotection given the recreation history. Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 06:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- In the meantime, GSS has not accepted the draft, so I am with Muboshgu here to wait until it is approved. If what Sulfurboy has said is true, meaning it needs to have protection removed to be approved, just leave a note on the drafts talk-page (or ping me) that it is ready to be moved to mainspace, and I will lower the protection. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, Afaik, there is no way to approve it unless the page protection is removed. I'm also an AfC reviewer and would approve it if I currently could, I phrased it as "may soon" in case another editor came to it first before I noted the protection removed. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – New editors keep adding unsourced content in the article, especially in the track listing section. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Object404 (talk) 08:07, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Bunch of IPs calling her irresponsible and others adding unsourced information. --. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 09:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection for three months: the same IP address was vandalizing multiple articles, which got three pages protected for three months: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RRArchive405#User:2001:8003:5022:5e01:b9ad:d85b:7a81:6819_reported_by_User:Ylevental_(Result:_Articles_semiprotected)
However, the individual was also vandalizing Alison Singer, but it got protected for only one week. It should also be three months for consistency. Ylevental (talk) 02:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Ylevental: I repeat what I said earlier: if you see a problem, please notify me (a ping or message on my talk). Articles are not protected on the basis of what might happen and it is just one IP that will be blocked if further disruption occurs. If necessary I will protect the article but it is not needed now. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This is generating quite a few low-quality edits. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:13, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Please an admin needs to look at this. It's not just a few "low-quality edits." They're an onslaught of defamatory WP:BLP violations. NedFausa (talk) 05:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I'll look through the history and revdelete any egregious BLP violations. — Wug·a·po·des 06:09, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Target of vandalism as a result of insider trading allegations. GeekInParadise (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Creation protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:15, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – He got released from the Rams and people vandalized the article with arthritis knee jokes a bit. Swagging (talk) 21:18, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: referenced BLP content repeatedly removed since March 1 by various IPs.Dialectric (talk) 22:28, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:19, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Possible signing of Tom Brady has not been officially announced by the team yet. Tampabay721 (talk) 23:27, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., regards. --Titodutta (talk) 02:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Random IP's are trying to interfere with AfD templates by altering timestamps and closing dates. It should be noted that IP activity trying to interfere with the deletion process also require protection at another article created by User:Alexpavel2, Mehran Tirdad, so this is likely a case of IP socking to prevent deletion of what appear to PR articles. GPL93 (talk) 18:25, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:00, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Mehran Tirdad was already protected by NinjaRobotPirate. — Wug·a·po·des 21:51, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The execution of four convicts today has brought a new wave of vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 00:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--regentspark (comment) 00:56, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty sure this is only going to get worse in the short term, given the amount of recent coverage of their controversial behavior. Waggie (talk) 00:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
21 March 2020
Indefinite full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Addition of poorly sourced content; potential edit warring. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Wikibenboy94 (talk) 16:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Looks more like a dispute among all types of editors, both anon and registered, new and old. If this continues, you could ask for full protection. Nobody seems to be using the talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected – 3 days. Thanks to User:Wallyfromdilbert for opening a thread on the talk page. There seems to be a dispute about the lead. Protection can be lifted if agreement is reached. EdJohnston (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: Removal of factual, well referenced content by head of eMarketing Eoin Kenneally [1] a representative of the firm, trying to edit a factual article to represent firm in better light. 81.187.190.111 (talk) 16:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, protection is not needed at this point, but if you continue adding material sourced primarily to Twitter protection against you will be needed.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term non-autoconfirmed vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 20:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism M4DU7 (talk) 12:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous long-term ip vandalism. Beshogur (talk) 13:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
this page needs a cleen and proctect there is loads of shows on here for example Dexter's Laboratory and Tate witch dose not belong here can someone check every show and proctect Indefinite create protection: Fanoflionking 15:08, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – If you want the article to be cleaned up, make a proposal on the talk page. You did not show examples of the type of bad edits that any admin could recognize. This is all a question of judgment as to which shows are worthy of inclusion. Need consensus to go any further. EdJohnston (talk) 15:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Lula is a very controversial political figure and his article is sufering with persistent vandalism. SirEdimon (talk) 18:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: This template has no reason to be edited. Also protect template:/testcases. PorkchopGMX 11:40, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm leaning decline, but I would prefer a second opinion on this. I don't see how this fits with the protection policy: it's not transcluded anywhere, there's been no edits since 2018, and it averages one page view every 3 days. For low-risk pages like this, if there's no reason to edit them, we just trust that people won't edit them. — Wug·a·po·des 20:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- This and Template:/testcases are not supposed to be transcluded anywhere or edited, but there is a reason to protect. Both pages are a copy of Template:/doc which is fully protected because of the same reason as what i say here: If we protect these pages, it will prevent most editors from making mistakes and creating template sandbox and testcases in the wrong place. Everything is possible but nothing is real... (PorkchopGMX) (t - c) 22:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- A discussion to fully protect Template:/doc occurred in this 2007 TfD. I think Wugapodes is correct that protection is outside WP:PROT but I would be inclined to protect if at a least small discussion somewhere appropriate (say WT:WikiProject Templates) concluded that protection was desirable. So I would recommend posting again if such a discussion provides consensus. Johnuniq (talk) 02:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- This to me is an obvious decline. These are just placeholder pages so that users don't actually try to create "Template:/sandbox", "Template:/testcases", etc without entering the subpage or template's name in first. It's not subject to high transclusion, and I don't see any recent disruption that would warrant protection per policy. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I agree with my three colleagues abvoe. There's no reason to protect these unless there's some evidence of high risk or disruption. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous long-term vandalism and unexplained removal of content by IPs. Oliszydlowski (talk) 13:07, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 3 months. Some kind of nationalist warring has been going on for months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- 2020 Conservative Party of Canada leadership election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Seeing some disruptive IP edits but a few constructive ones as well. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 1 month. IP editors are making a large fraction of all the changes but they almost never use the talk page. I agree that some of the contributions are beneficial. Anonymous editors can still use the talk page to make requests. EdJohnston (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and BLP violations from IP-hopper. Schauffle (talk) 10:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. I've applied a range block to
2607:FB90:CE22::/47now 2607:FB90:CE00::/42 in order to stop the user from using it to hop IP addresses and continue their disruption. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)- Vandal has found another IP address/range. Can we reconsider? Schauffle (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Schauffle - See above - range block widened. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Vandal has found another IP address/range. Can we reconsider? Schauffle (talk) 10:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalized from Australia. Flix11 (talk) 10:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent spam by IPs and new users, possibly sockpuppetry by Babythuy. creffett (talk) 13:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 15:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by a Hungarian IP. Flix11 (talk) 08:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Louisville IP vandal. Flix11 (talk) 08:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 09:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- I've also blocked 2607:FB90:CE00::/42. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – A user (UConnHusky7) keeps adding disorganised and sometimes irrelevant material to the page. I have reverted it back but that is not deterring him. His edits fail to keep with the page's thematic structure. Cartney23 (talk) 09:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Don't know what set this off, but multiple accounts have started attacking this BLP. Meters (talk) 10:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 12 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by Lyfstxle. Flix11 (talk) 03:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined The user has been blocked indefinitely by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 06:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism by Lyfstxle (talk · contribs). Flix11 (talk) 03:14, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined The user has been blocked indefinitely by another administrator. Johnuniq (talk) 06:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page have been created after splitting from 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India which requires extended confirmed rights for a user to edit. Provide the same protection for splitted page. Mayankj429 (talk) 09:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done. I've migrated the same protection level and duration from the parent article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 10:11, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent disruptive edits and reverts by unconfirmed IP addresses, without these IP addresses consulting confirmed editors on talk page. Amorals (talk) 17:12, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I'm going to restore the article to the way it was before the edit warring began a few days ago. And I will put a note on your talk page. MelanieN (talk) 01:39, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Recent death. IP BLP vio's. - FlightTime (open channel) 06:58, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Every human edit (excluding reversions) since the beginning of the year has been link spam. Thtatithticth (talk) 07:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Huff Daland Dusters Inc.
- Please unprotect the following so they can be made to redirect to Huff-Daland. All are terms used in other articles:
- Huff Daland Dusters Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Huff Daland Duster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Huff Daland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 06:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sangdeboeuf: Those pages are not protected. Editing is blocked by a title blacklist entry. They can be edited by administrators, template editors, and page movers so I guess I could create them if you spell out the exact wikitext wanted, preferably in a sandbox that I can copy/paste. I'm not claiming these as mine and would be happy for anyone to beat me to it. Johnuniq (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'd suggest copying and pasting the following into each page:
—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 07:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)#REDIRECT [[Huff-Daland]]
{{Rcat shell|
{{R to related topic}}
}}
- I'd suggest copying and pasting the following into each page:
- Done Johnuniq (talk) 08:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – The large majority of edits in the past year have been unsourced and unexplained major changes to population figures, for the most part adding clearly fabricated, inflated, and false numbers. The edits are from various IPs/locations and sometimes throwaway accounts, not all from the same person. There have been almost no positive contributions from non-autoconfirmed users. IamNotU (talk) 15:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I think part of the problem may be that the page has only 15 watchers, so problem edits don't get caught promptly. However, there are not enough or recent enough problem edits to warrant protection. MelanieN (talk) 01:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism. PohranicniStraze (talk) 00:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vandalism continues to occur despite several past temporary protections. Gilbert.JW (talk) 02:05, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Johnuniq (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Johnuniq: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Oops, I meant to use the semi-protected template as we need to escalate before considering indefinite. Johnuniq (talk) 02:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP-users add unsourced content and remove/change sourced content. Non-stop disruptive edits in the recent days (since 17 March). Wario-Man (talk) 15:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
: Already protected by administrator Oshwah. MelanieN (talk) 01:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:49, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. My mistake, that protection was this same week a year ago. This must happen every year around March 20. MelanieN (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some unsourced edits regarding future release date. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:22, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 18:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:24, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 18:23, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Persistent disruptive editing. - I have produced a reliable source that states that Goofy's second voice actor is a man named Danny Webb and have given an exact quotation from the source and yet IPs still keep changing it to George Johnson. This needs to stop. LittleJerry (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @LittleJerry: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- I fixed it. LittleJerry (talk) 19:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continuous disruptive/unsourced editing among IPs. Magitroopa (talk) 20:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:28, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term IP vandalism/BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated block evasions by IP by adding red links and false information. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 23:29, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 23:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Mediafanatic17: We are supposed to proceed slowly before trying WP:ECP so I semi-protected. Post again if problem continues after it expires. Johnuniq (talk) 02:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – A bit of edit warring. The4lines (talk) 14:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I don't see much vandalism, and the dispute seems to have been resolved by normal editorial processes. I think the page is fine as is, but if the situation changes, come back and post again. — Wug·a·po·des 21:00, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Seeing widespread use, should be protected similar to other high-visibility templates. Carl Fredrik talk 14:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. ~300 transclusions right now, so I think template protection is too much. — Wug·a·po·des 20:55, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Maz246810, using IPs in the range Special:Contributions/2A02:C7D:D675:7F00:0:0:0:0/64. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:33, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Oshwah. — Wug·a·po·des 21:32, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
22 March 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – That nonsense about Lisa Riley returning is STILL being constantly readded. I'd REALLY love to know what the motivation behind it is... Thegreatluigi (talk) 14:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:27, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – See above. Thegreatluigi (talk) 14:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:29, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Seems to be some personal feud between IP editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistently vandalized from Canada. Flix11 (talk) 10:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:16, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 12:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Perisistent coronavirus-related vandalism for US infectious diseases member of White House Coronavirus Task Force, most of last 20 edits are vandalism. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:13, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 1 month. Also blocked a registered user, User:Oedipus72. EdJohnston (talk) 14:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, EdJohnston-- my first use of Twinkle, which is wondrous indeed! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- The Pirates Who Don't Do Anything: A VeggieTales Movie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – an anon continues to add unsourced content and make other unexplained changes. When this one tires of it, another will come along. I don't think there's much more sourced information to add to this film considering it was released a decade ago. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 05:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:01, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Train of Knowledge (Talk) 07:40, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: Ongoing story, a lot of media has been generated about this story today. The company's Comms team keep trying to manage reputation by removing content from Wikipedia. The section on "Coronavirus Controversy" has now been well referenced to multiple external news sources now that information is in the public domain, not Twitter, which a previous editor was unhappy about. AdamBlogs who has made a number of alterations to the page, very much looks like an agent of the company and Eoin Kennelly is listed on the Internet as a Director of eCommunications so neither are a neutral source. I do however accept ymBlanters point that Twitter is an insufficient source for referencing, which is why I have replaced those sources with news articles which have come out in the past day. 81.187.190.111 (talk) 23:50, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:35, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: Intense IP vandalism. Refuses to stop removing sourced material. Rusted AutoParts 00:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Rusted AutoParts, please be more careful when editing biographies of living people.
Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution.~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)- Need a second opinion now that I've been dragged into the discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn in Special:Diff/946749303 – do feel free to re-request at any time. Sorry for how this went; this was a bit chaotic due to my handling of the situation. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Need a second opinion now that I've been dragged into the discussion. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Withdrawn by requestor ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Yesterday my talk page was highly vandalized [[60]] , please I request you to secure this page soon ,Otherwise it can be vandalism, if you can secure it forever, I will always be thankful to you. Vivek ji123 (talk) 05:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Unless they return, I think you're alright. El_C 05:36, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent high level of IP and new-user vandalism since last protection expired. Have had to revert adding unrelated company names, dates, nonexistent shows, etc. Hammill Ten (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs and users in the Etymology section. Doesn’t seem to be subsiding anytime soon. Gotitbro (talk) 16:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:34, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite(?) semi-protection: Persistent vandalism By unknown IP addresses which is then used for malicious propaganda, this is straight after previous protection had expired Taimoorahmed11 (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 22:35, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:26, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Edit warring about the mention of anti-semeticism. ZimZalaBim talk 22:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent abusive vandalism from ip hoppers. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:21, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
23 March 2020
Semi-protection: This featured article is being targeted by one person, using different IPs, to enforce the same unexplained, disruptive edit ([61], [62], [63], [64]). isento (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:31, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adding unsourced contents about the potential postponement as the games is still ahead on schedule. ApprenticeFan work 21:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:34, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pretty much the only editing to this article for the last four years has been vandalism. It has been protected at various points in the past. Nigej (talk) 07:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Trivialist (talk) 09:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:24, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent, continuous vandalism and disruptive edits mostly by IPs and new accounts. A long -term PP is required here seeing the page history. Gotitbro (talk) 10:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. DoebLoggs (talk) 09:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:30, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Mass changes of weight by IP. MrJaroslavik (talk) 14:26, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:33, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPv6/64 address associated with the disruptive edits continues to restore content that has been rejected, and has not bothered to discuss their changes after reverted. As this is a dynamic address, warning will likely not bring attention to their problematic edits ... range block or semiprotection of article recommended. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Additional comment: Same IPv6/64 responsible for plenty of disruptive editing at My Girl (film), where their edits were reverted by a number of editors, myself included ... and which led to a semiprotection period of one week. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. – Blocked the /64 range for one month. EdJohnston (talk) 16:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing once again. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 18:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The previous semi-protection ended in January, since then we have a constant stream of IP/new account vandalism, often disguised ("fixed grammar" and similar). --mfb (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I really do not see the constant stream here...there was a spike during the last days, but pending-changes protection works just fine. I have watchlisted. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Elizium23 (talk) 07:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. — LeoFrank Talk 16:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – 2 months. EdJohnston (talk) 16:57, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite protection: Consistent IP Vandalism that takes out Terrence Malick Lebanese ancestry which is stated in 3 of his written biographies without adding a new source. Chris O' Hare (talk) 11:46, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. A rather light amount of disruption all things considered, but you're right--it's consistent, and it's regarding a rather sensitive BLP matter. Let's try PC. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 16:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism immediately after the last protection was lifted.VVikingTalkEdits 16:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 16:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Nonsense edits. Serols (talk) 16:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 16:16, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Anonymous tendentious IP editor attempting to remove valid information from a recently-passed featured article. Toa Nidhiki05 00:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, the discussion finally was started at the talk page with the IP participating--Ymblanter (talk) 08:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism is going-on on this page. MRRaja001 (talk) 09:36, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Purely promotional page that is being recreated. IPs then remove CSD notices to prevent deletion (see here). MrClog (talk) 13:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Creation protected There is still a draft, though. Lectonar (talk) 13:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Pending changes isn't sufficient. Schauffle (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Schauffle (talk) 00:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:14, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – This page has been receiving a lot of vandalism recently, and I think it definitely needs semi-protection. . Golem08 (talk) 04:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 1 instance of disruptive editing in the last 10 days or so. Lectonar (talk) 07:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Appears to be coordinated attack form multiple Philippine IPs. Meters (talk) 07:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:02, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 16:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious sock Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JamesOredan continuing years-long disruption. Please protect briefly until they are blocked, thanks. IamNotU (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected – 3 months. EdJohnston (talk) 17:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Obvious sock Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JamesOredan continuing years-long disruption. Please protect briefly until they are blocked, thanks. IamNotU (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected – 3 months. The user is unlikely to give up any time soon. He is now willing to come back with new accounts to get around the semiprotection. EdJohnston (talk) 17:06, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP address range 112.134.X.X repeatedly removed the logo. ᴛʜᴇMᴀɴLK (Talk) 15:50, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. User(s) not even warned. -- Alexf(talk) 20:15, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection Lots of vandalism from IPs and brand-new accounts with no other edits. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:25, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alexf(talk) 20:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: IP vandalism over countless months, making purposefully disruptive edits. Page has been protected before, but vandalism continues afterwards each time. DarkGlow (talk) 18:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
24 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-term vandalism/BLP violations from multiple editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:50, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 22:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term new editor/IP vandalism and BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 22:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Remove Protection: The page has no vandalism and it is getting outdated as there are no editors. 85.48.185.149 (talk) 21:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unprotected It seems to me that indefinite protection may have been unnecessary at the time. I'll allow it to be unprotected and will watch the page to see if protection remains necessary. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. as a general sanction. The IP edits are low volume and good faith; pending changes prevents inaccurate information getting out but still allows good faith contribution from IPs. If the volume of unsourced edits or other disruption picks, up come back for an increase in protection level. — Wug·a·po·des 21:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: an IP hopper persistently adds unsourced and politically sensitive info. Ymblanter (talk) 12:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Airplaneman: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)- Fixed. Used the wrong template. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 21:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Article has been the target of an IP-hopping POV-pusher over the past week. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 18:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:15, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism/BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations – ip hopper adding unsourced, and likely untrue, gossip about the subject's private life. Valenciano (talk) 16:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. by Ad Orientem (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 20:58, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 21:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recent death. Lots of infobox vandalism. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 19:06, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: The common page is Semi-protected. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Extended confirmed protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. If something is wanted, please post again with an explanation. This section is for a reduction in protection but that does not appear to be what was requested. Johnuniq (talk) 08:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing continues . Semsurî (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism from multiple IPs, see edit filter for article as well. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism due to the name and nature of this article. . Bᴇʀʀᴇʟʏ • Talk∕Contribs 13:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:26, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 04:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:18, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unsourced addition. Flix11 (talk) 05:04, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: template associated with Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 that is highly visible. Moxy 🍁 05:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. One year seems right from Wikipedia:General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019#Log of page-level restrictions. Johnuniq (talk) 08:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced content addition. Flix11 (talk) 05:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The vandal is back again[65] from a new account User:Damonbaste because the page's protection has expired. Previously vandalism reported at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fortnite life 420. Rubelantri (talk) 07:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:54, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined No vandalism in ~6 hours, and only those edits the last few months so I think the problem has passed. If they come back soon make another request and it would probably be worth protecting for a few days. — Wug·a·po·des 03:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant edits from IP users disregarding sources without explanation and willingness to discuss. NYKTNE (talk) 02:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @NYKTNE: I'm trying to understand what's going on. For example, the template now says Geoffrey Cox is Attorney General for England and Wales yet the latter says it is Suella Braverman, and that is also stated on Braverman's article. I think you are saying Cox is correct but one of the IPs says Braverman. Why are the IPs wrong, and could that be explained at talk, which redirects to Talk:Second Johnson ministry? Johnuniq (talk) 02:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq: That's not the repeated edits that do not follow source. It's just an edit that is made in the wrong template - cabinet 2 is not the latest cabinet but cabinet 3 is. The ones that I am referring to are the ministerial ranking. Most if not all sources show that Javid is ranked before Raab but some IP users keep putting Raab before Javid. NYKTNE (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @NYKTNE: OK but please explain the issue in advance next time. It would be good if the IPs could be alerted about the issue at least with an edit summary. I see one such summary but it only made sense after noticing the heading "December 2019 – February 2020" at Second Johnson ministry#Cabinet. Johnuniq (talk) 06:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq: So sorry that I was not aware of the fact that there was such confusion. Will make it clear next time. Thanks! NYKTNE (talk) 07:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite full protection: Persistent vandalism – Constantly Vandalised. Of the top 50 edits, 15 were revisions or undos. TheMightyWalrus (talk) 03:11, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Most of the disruption was from a sock ~2 weeks ago; the disruption today was from a single IP that I've blocked. There seems to be one IP trying to make good faith edits, so protection would cause unnecessary collateral damage. Do come back if the situation changes though. — Wug·a·po·des 03:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP repeatedly removing well-cited factual material about conviction. Toddst1 (talk) 00:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Toddst1: Before the recent activity, the article had nearly 200 words on the person's conviction with another 320 words on other aspects of their life. Given that the subject is not a serial killer, that is undue. Would you really want to prevent IPs from removing '
While serving his sentence at Lompoc FCI, Goldfarb was given the yard nickname of “Larry the Lion”
'? I recommend trimming it to something reasonable and posting again if IPs edit war to remove a WP:DUE mention. Johnuniq (talk) 02:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism - Coronavirus pandemic response sub-section is supported by a credible citation; the user currently removing the sub-section has no other edits. Brad (talk) 01:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. I warned the editor about edit warring and reverted to the stable version. This isn't something that page protection should resolve. — Wug·a·po·des 01:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @DividedFrame: (Brad) Please do not add righting-great-wrongs material to articles. General sanctions apply to corona virus editing and please just drop it. Johnuniq (talk) 02:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
The deaths should be divided into coronavirus related and non-coronavirus related. 95.49.82.47 (talk) 17:17, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @95.49.82.47: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined. Not a protection request, and not a proposal that is likely to be accepted. MelanieN (talk) 21:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Making manipulative edits
- Hulusi Akar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Şırnak clashes (2015–16) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary full protection: Konli17 (talk · contribs) making manipulative edits, withouth checking what the source actually states. For example this edit. Even the source states it is against ISIL and it is a fact (Operation Euphrates Shield), this user changes the wording to "In 2016 Akar led Operation Euphrates Shield, the Turkish military intervention in Syria to prevent the Syrian Democratic Forces taking advantage of the retreat of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant." as if Turkey was protecting ISIL against SDF. Second edit, here. "the PKK executed two police officers in their sleep on 22 July." to "two police officers were killed while sleeping on 22 July" and added "Although the PKK denied responsibility" without any source. and this is what the source states: "Two Turkish police officers have been found dead, shot in the head, in an attack close to the Syrian border claimed by the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK).". The article says PKK claimed the attack, and this user changed it to "denied". Please full protection. This user has similar edits on different pages. Beshogur (talk) 21:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- I reckon the wording in the OES article matches my edit more closely, and I don't know where The Telegraph gets its information, but the PKK has consistently denied involvement in that attack. This user has a history of reverting without providing edit summaries, and has refused to engage me on talk pages. Konli17 (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- So your "secret sources" are more reliable then Telegraph? Beshogur (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. MelanieN (talk) 23:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Auto-confirmed protection requested: per this discussion on talk page, far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones has recently uploaded a video onto YouTube, where he accuses this article of "spreading unsubstantiated, politicized opinions from quacks". The "quacks" he's referring to are academics, and the article recently passed FA. Would appreciate it if someone would protect the article and talk page from IP edits—at least until the Alex Jones furore has dissipated. (should be no more than 2 weeks) Thanks. Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 01:33, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to {{ping}} me after replying off my talk page 04:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: BLP policy violations. Binksternet (talk) 04:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. It's just one IP and it's only been a few hours. If they had properly warned I might have blocked them. Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic/Current consensus (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Arbitration enforcement – "Arbitration enforcement" is probably the wrong reason, but it was the closest option Twinkle had. Basically, this page is for listing established consensuses achieved at Talk:2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic. It should only be edited by experienced editors capable of assessing consensus, and should be extended-confirmed protected (mirroring the protection at Talk:Donald Trump/Current consensus) to prevent disruption by others. For further context, please see Talk:2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic#Discussion. Sdkb (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Hmm...but there was no disruption yet, afaics. Lectonar (talk) 07:12, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. If there starts to be a problem, then we can consider protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- List of awards and nominations received by Red Velvet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism by changing the numbers of awards won and received multiple times. Aimndae (talk) 15:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 21:28, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Some edit warring between a few editors regarding synonyms for the name. -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:10, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dispute participants notified about general sanctions. LuK3, please re-request if this continues, but I'll probably not use page protection then. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @ToBeFree: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined for now. See talk page of the article. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
25 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking by IP. Flix11 (talk) 18:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. for 72 hours by Kinu. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 19:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Some anon editors adding unsourced content. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent unhelpful reverting by IP. ZimZalaBim talk 21:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator 5 albert square. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and block evasion by a sock puppet. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 18:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. by another admin. SarahSV (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sensitive, high-visibility page. Most IP edits disruptive and some are possibly dangerous. See also WP:GS/COVID. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brihaspati (talk) 10:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of cited content by IPs and new users. Nizil (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking from the same puppeteer through IPs and socks. Requesting temporary PP atleast for the time being. Gotitbro (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until 5 Apr after the tournament concludes. The last nine edits are each IP reverts of one another, and the chaos must abate: [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74]. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose. This user has reverted the sourced info five times and semi-protection will be the big advantage for him in the dispute where he is absolutely wrong. 94.178.235.125 (talk) 15:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Have the involved parties considered taking the issue to WP:ARBREQ? –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- That is an appalling false equivalence, and would only lend this disruptive IP troll credibility and modicum of respect that they do not deserve. It's one IPv6, Joserobjr, Adpete, and I who have contributed on the talk page. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Excuse me for following WP:GOODFAITH. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- As you are well aware, WP:AGF is not meant to be used on those who are intentionally disruptive, which this IP is. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) You're not doing yourself any favors by directing abuse at other editors ("Bandera apologist neo-fascist") –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- You're not doing yourself any favors by sidestepping the fact that the only person who has refused to post on the talk page is this IP. Also, conveniently ignoring their astonishing [75] [76] [77] [78] in 42 minutes. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) You're not doing yourself any favors by directing abuse at other editors ("Bandera apologist neo-fascist") –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- As you are well aware, WP:AGF is not meant to be used on those who are intentionally disruptive, which this IP is. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Excuse me for following WP:GOODFAITH. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- That is an appalling false equivalence, and would only lend this disruptive IP troll credibility and modicum of respect that they do not deserve. It's one IPv6, Joserobjr, Adpete, and I who have contributed on the talk page. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Have the involved parties considered taking the issue to WP:ARBREQ? –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Its a fake claim about "only person". Another persons: [79] [80] 94.178.235.125 (talk) 17:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is a pathetic non-attempt at deflection. Your first diff is showing a registered user (not yourself) contributing to the discussion, your second only bolsters the case that IPs are the sole source of disruption. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- And that user said: I the person who wanted to include tiebreakers. So you removed the sourced info (and my posts many times), plus huge personal attacks. See: [81] [82] 94.178.235.125 (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- This is a pathetic non-attempt at deflection. Your first diff is showing a registered user (not yourself) contributing to the discussion, your second only bolsters the case that IPs are the sole source of disruption. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Its a fake claim about "only person". Another persons: [79] [80] 94.178.235.125 (talk) 17:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:06, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator El C. Plus OP blocked. Favonian (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly re-inserting disputed content at a BLP without explanation. WanderingWanda (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 19:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: In the news, vandalism ensued. Please semi-protect for a week. --bender235 (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 19:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking by multiple socks from the same puppeteer as above, requesting semi for now. Gotitbro (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one user, and semi-protection works against the IPs. The user has been at it for days, and there is just one warning so far. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Not sure what exactly you meant here, this is a case of blatant socking. All the IPs and blocked accounts you see in the page history are the same puppeteer (a very chronic one). This page is not even under semi and I am requesting that here. Same for the above two cases, its not simply a new single IP/user, there are multiple auto-confirmed accounts and IPs of the same puppeteer and the pages clearly need a higher level of protection. This one doesn't even have any PP. Please revisit these. Gotitbro (talk) 11:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As with other articles pertaining to Muhammad, this one seems to be heading for indef semi protection eventually. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent WP:BLP violations and disruptive editing. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking by multiple socks from the same puppeteer as above, requesting semi for now. Gotitbro (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one user, and semi-protection works against the IPs. The user has been at it for days, and there is just one warning so far. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Not sure what exactly you meant here, this is a case of blatant socking. All the IPs and blocked accounts you see in the page history are the same puppeteer (a very chronic one). This page is not even under semi and I am requesting that here. Same for the above two cases, its not simply a new single IP/user, there are multiple auto-confirmed accounts and IPs of the same puppeteer and the pages clearly need a higher level of protection. This one doesn't even have any PP. Please revisit these. Gotitbro (talk) 11:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. As with other articles pertaining to Muhammad, this one seems to be heading for indef semi protection eventually. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Consistent WP:BLP violations and disruptive editing. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Chronic sockpuppetry, semi does not seem to be working at all (see page history). Requesting ECP at least for a few months. Gotitbro (talk) 05:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one user, and semi-protection works against the IPs. Lectonar (talk) 07:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Same reason as above, current PP doesn't seem to be working at all against the puppeteer. Gotitbro (talk) 05:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Just one user, and semi-protection works against the IPs. Lectonar (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs are doing POV push and vandalising article. . Brihaspati (talk) 05:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:37, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs changing language order in the infobox arbitrarily. They don't seem to discuss this matter either. The current format of the article is after extensive discussion at the talk page. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This draft is being repeatedly submitted to AFC by IP addresses, disregarding instructions from reviewers to discuss at the series talk page. Semi-protecting this draft, to prevent IP addresses from editing it, seems less restrictive than Rejecting it or nominating it for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:37, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined The draft has now been moved to The Biggest Loser (season 18) so please post a new request if needed. Johnuniq (talk) 05:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by the same user form different IPv6 addresses (which change frequently) in the 2600:1012.* range. Since the disruptive editing does not seem to be abating anytime soon (see page history), requesting a long-term PP. Gotitbro (talk) 20:47, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Gotitbro: The most recent IP edit was diff and while slightly broken, it was an improvement on the current
Their origins are variously claimed to be Arab, indigenous Sindhi people or from Rajputs.
which is missing a word or two ("Rajputs" possibly was originally intended to describe people from Rajput, and the "from" is wrong and perhaps should be "people from Rajput"). Shouldn't "based from" in the first sentence be "based in"? Is there some background of nationalist edit warring that I'm missing? I don't want to discuss the content here—my point is that the article should not be protected without evidence that the IPs are damaging it. Johnuniq (talk) 06:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)- @Johnuniq: If you look at the history of the page, it was stable before different IPs started edit warring there, specifically from the above range (which has other Pakistan specific POVPUSHing in different articles as well). The IPs from the range have been reverted by multiple experienced users in the article but the user continues to edit war [with no attempt at discussion] aided by the constantly changing dynamic IPv6 addresses. Gotitbro (talk) 07:04, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. See this. And the disruption is not big enough to warrant protection, anyway, as it is few and far between. Lectonar (talk) 07:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 06:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Thanks for reporting this. — Newslinger talk 09:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive sock-puppetry, started as soon as the previous semi expired. Clearly needs a more binding longer PP. Gotitbro (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP editors edit warring each other on this page. robertsky (talk) 06:13, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. One vandal using multiple IPs from the same range. I've requested a rangeblock at AIV. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 06:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 07:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Sudden uptick in IP and new user edits over the past couple of days, and these came with significant unsourced BLP issues (both positive and negative). creffett (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced/inaccurate additions. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 00:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 07:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – probably unsourced BLP. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 01:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:58, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – multiple violations of WP:NOTNEWS. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 23:12, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @FilmandTVFan28: Sorry but I would need to spend too long to find out what socking was going on and the article has never previously been protected. Please post again if it persists after protection expires. Johnuniq (talk) 06:48, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 03:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing, probably one user with WP:MULTIPLE accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We rarely protect talk pages, but this is the same disruptive nonsense, probably from a sock farm, that was being added at Looney Tunes until it was protected. MelanieN (talk) 02:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary create protection: Non-notable article that was moved to draftspace, then repeatedly re-created by same user while ignoring advice. Pending 3rd speedy deletion. Cryptic Canadian 02:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Creation protected indefinitely. MelanieN (talk) 02:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Requesting article reversion to revision 947235019 and semi-protection due to unsourced edits/vandalism resulting from article popularity on external websites due to reports on Waffle House closures due to COVID19. ShadowMoltres (talk) 03:33, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 04:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – Removal of sourced contents by IP addresses and registered accounts. I feel the article should be protected from disruptive edits. GSS 💬 13:25, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined — Wug·a·po·des 21:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Just saw the note Gotitbro left on your talk page. I need to look into this more, but still decline as a block is probably more appropriate than protection at this point given the low level of disruption. — Wug·a·po·des 21:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated bizarre additions to plot by various IP and new accounts. Geoff | Who, me? 17:27, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brihaspati (talk) 15:46, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-Protected: Sock puppetry using IPs by persistent but recently blocked user Fona2000. Jonie148 (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – lots of IP vandalism. Huldra (talk) 22:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 22:52, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
26 March 2020
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism in the form of trying to revert to the original release date of March 20th. Weird edit summaries like this. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 21:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 21:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IPs and new user keep inserting promotional language. Yosemiter (talk) 21:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Looks like an active edit war. You both should stop and use the talk page. — Wug·a·po·des 21:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic/Current consensus (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)
Extended-confirmed protection: There seems to be consensus to reduce the protection level at Talk:2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic#Current_consensus_discussion. Sdkb (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done There's rough consensus to lower protection. I kept full move protection per WP:MOVP since it's highly visible and has no reason to move. Ping protecting admin TomStar81 as a courtesy. — Wug·a·po·des 21:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Lowered to Semi-protection. Despite the local consensus, the community requires admins show semi-protection is ineffective before applying extended-confirmed protection to pages. I still think some form of protection is warranted given the high visibility of the template though. — Wug·a·po·des 22:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 17:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 18:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Carl Fredrik talk 21:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. as a general sanction — Wug·a·po·des 21:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
''The Frankfurt School page, the Discussion and the Talk are semi-protected so I could not submit this to the editors.
The section on Cultural Marxism is extremely slanted, even in the title of that section (which is not linked in the table of contents) it is referred to only as Cultural Marxism Conspiracy Theory. At the very least, that should be edited to Cultural Marxism, in line with the other headings on the page. There is no mention or discussion whatsoever that Cultural Marxism is a political analysis that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with a 'far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory', although any history of that certainly can/should be mentioned in this section as well.
'You should not discount, refuse to note, dismiss or remove a political theory/analysis, just because it has been mentioned or utilized at some time in history or in some form by a far-right or far-left group or because you disagree with it. Cultural Marxism actually needs its own Wiki page', but I think that's a different story. I likely will be applying to edit this page in a few days or write a separate Cultural Marxism one -- I can't seem to find my old Wiki account, so had to create a new one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnwaller (talk • contribs) 18:21, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – You indicated that you lost your old account. Once you made ten edits with your new account and waited four days, you will be able to edit at Talk:Frankfurt School and make your proposal there. In the mean time, somebody else has copied your suggestion to Talk:Frankfurt School#See WP:RPP#Frankfurt School. If anyone agrees with your proposal they may be able to follow up. EdJohnston (talk) 16:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:38, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Brojam (talk) 17:21, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Racist and sexist vandalism, persistent attempts by IP users to remove sourced material. RKT7789 (talk) 17:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Tedder. MelanieN (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Apparently coordinated attack restarted as soon as protection ended. Meters (talk) 18:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:03, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism. --Another Believer (Talk) 18:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: In 2018, we saw someone vandalize this template on 1 April. I wouldn't want to see any repeats of that. O.N.R. (talk) 14:52, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done We don't pre-emptively protect things because there was a single piece of vandalism two years ago. Since this will never be used on anything public-facing (if anyone does try to pull an April Fools stunt in mainspace or filespace they'll be treated as we would any other vandal), there's no particular concern here. ‑ Iridescent 15:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: This page currently has Extended confirmed protection. Make it as Semi-protected. Reason: The common page is Semi-protected. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @NJA:, the protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Why not apply indefinite semi-protection for this article like other some country specific articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.77.93.25 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Because every article has to be judged on its own merits (or non-merits, in this case). Let's wait what the protecting admin has to say. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Lectonar: Givingbacktosociety may be unaware as they're a newer account, but it is ECP due to Arbitration committee sanctions on the topic. See the notes here, N.J.A. | talk 11:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Because every article has to be judged on its own merits (or non-merits, in this case). Let's wait what the protecting admin has to say. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This is definitely the wrong time to remove ECP because of the lockdown. Doug Weller talk 17:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: the bot won't recognize the template if it's not indented at least one level, is this formatting intentional? — Wug·a·po·des 05:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- The notes from here says that Semi-protection was requested but Extended confirmation protection was added. Still I don't see a reason for Extendeded confirmation protection. Also [[83]] has nothing to do with this. Was there any particular set of edits for which Extended confirmation protection was added to stop them?. Make it as Semi-protected and if there are still issues then Extended confirmation protection can be considered. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 20:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Givingback, I realize you find it frustrating that the article is under ECP, because it means that YOU cannot edit it. But ECP is the appropriate protection at this time. You can make suggestions at the talk page. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nowhere I mentioned that it is frustrating that I cannot edit it. What is the reasoning behind saying Extended confirmation is needed. I have asked this several times and have not got an answer so far. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Before the page was protected, anonymous and autoconfirmed editors were editing disruptively. Extended confirmed protection was applied to stop this because no lesser protection level would stop the disruption from autoconfirmed accounts. General sanctions for covid-19 related articles makes me believe lowering protection is not worth the risk at this time, and it should be left to expire on its own. — Wug·a·po·des 05:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Nowhere I mentioned that it is frustrating that I cannot edit it. What is the reasoning behind saying Extended confirmation is needed. I have asked this several times and have not got an answer so far. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Givingback, I realize you find it frustrating that the article is under ECP, because it means that YOU cannot edit it. But ECP is the appropriate protection at this time. You can make suggestions at the talk page. -- MelanieN (talk) 23:20, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected for the bot. I would suggest further discussion of the merits of ECP should be with the protecting admin on their talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Requesting immediate archiving... Favonian (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The order of the cabinet in the UK does matter because it shows the seniority, but IP user starting with "2a00:23c5:2c08:6a01" kept on changing the ministerial ranking to an order that was not recorded in any of the sources (Raab above Sunak). Gov uk explicitly ranked the Chancellor over First Secretary of State in this cabinet. NYKTNE (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of a week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:34, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template – Millions of views each day, some recent issues that have caused edits to break the page. Ongoing talk-discussion. Carl Fredrik talk 12:56, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 13:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by persistent Croatian IP hopper. Flix11 (talk) 02:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Flix11: Those edits are not what is regarded as vandalism at Wikipedia, see WP:VAND. There are no discussions on talk and as someone totally uninformed on the topic I cannot see why the IP is wrong. Please either link to a central discussion somewhere showing the problem, or put an explanation on article talk and link to it in edit summaries reverting the changes. Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined per John. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by persistent Croatian IP hopper. Flix11 (talk) 02:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Flix11: Again (as with Jermaine Pennant above) I cannot see that the IP's edits are vandalism and it would help if you give a very brief explanation. I looked at their contributions this time and see they got a short block and they ranted on your talk where an editor offers an opinion on the IP's background. Please do not say anything like "shut up Croatian" (diff) even if addressing a long-term abuser. Apart from the need to be nice (and WP:CIVIL), it is counterproductive because the sure-fire way to make an abuser dedicate years of their life to causing trouble is to address them in that fashion. Maybe another admin here will understand the topic and investigate. Johnuniq (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined as above HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Continued disruptive editing by IP-hopping blocked user. Alivardi (talk) 10:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:10, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: Persistent vandalism - Continued disruptive editing by IP's. AshMusique (talk) 10:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits by IPs and brand new accounts. Puduḫepa 11:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – User who had been edit warring to include links to black market sales sites has returned with new sock account. Not much warring -yet- but we really don't want Wikipedia to be a directory for illegal drug sellers. MrOllie (talk) 12:02, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 14:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: Page is being invaded with spamming from an IP range over years, adding things without any reliable sources and also changing the original content within a historic book. Kindly make any future edit be under the encyclopedia's administration supervision to help maintain reliability. Thank you. Jeruswikip (talk) 02:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Jeruswikip: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 02:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined pendng changes wouldn't do any good because the problem appears to be a lack of people paying attention, and semi-protection isn't justified becasue the edits are infrequent. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:54, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing over the last week. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Kind Tennis Fan: I don't have time to evaluate this at the moment but WP:BLP articles should not have undue focus on a bad phase in someone's life. For one thing, a subheading of "Substance abuse and legal issues" is just absurd—a heading like that might be justified in a 30,000 word article about someone who had issues for ten years with serious consequences such as causing a death in a car accident. There is an old comment at Talk:Yancy Butler#Substance abuse and legal issues that I hope to investigate later. Johnuniq (talk) 03:08, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: Hello Johnuniq. I accept that the title of the subheading "Substance abuse and legal issues" was not ideal. I have now removed that subheading and kept the three sentences in the "Personal life" section. But the content regarding her substance abuse and legal issues has already been substantially trimmed down since concerns were first raised on the talk page in 2018. Following the trimming, the editor Cullen328 stated: "I agree that the level of detail about legal problems and substance abuse was excessive, but complete removal of this content is not justified. Thanks to the editors who trimmed it way back."
- Regards, Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for removing the heading. It's still a bit gossipy for my taste but the three sources (mostly celeb gossip pages) show the problem extended over a significant period. Ideally there would be a secondary source commenting on the effect on the person's life but that might not be achievable. I'll leave this for another admin to consider. Johnuniq (talk) 04:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I agree with John and the IP. Wholesale removal is not necessarily the best approach but the IP is attempting to address a legitimate problem in accordance with our BLP policy. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:01, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – User 125.201.27.167 is consistently vandalising this page. JohnnyBflat (talk) 05:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- IP now blocked Meters (talk) 05:35, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined IPs blocked. Please post again if it resumes. Johnuniq (talk) 06:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Unsuppress file history: to enable exportation to commons/restoring image quality. The image is a public domain text logo originally wrongly tagged as fair use, therefore file history is errantly suppressed. 17jiangz1 (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Vanadalism from multiple IPs recently. Shah Fahad️✉️ 04:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Attracting a lot attention due to apparent prediction of viral infection resembling COVID19. Jschnur (talk) 05:30, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:27, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of vandalism.XRedParrot (talk) 09:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 09:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes protection: The page is currently Extended confirmed protection. it may be valuable if it has pending changes protection Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 06:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr.Mani Raj Paul: could you elaborate a bit please? Do you want the protection lowered, or pending changes protection put on top of the existing protection? Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @Mr.Mani Raj Paul: I don't see any recent problems at the page and ECP protection is probably desirable, while pending changes quickly becomes a burden as many edits need to be approved or reverted. Please post again with the clarification requested by Lectonar if a change is needed. Johnuniq (talk) 02:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Attempts by various IPs to add a "virtual pub" called Frank Ryan. FDW777 (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 02:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 03:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:16, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 03:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: While the recent IP editor is likely a vandal, his assertions about the naming actually reflect Wikipedia convention. Cryptic Canadian 03:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The country is no longer exist. Flix11 (talk) 03:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: IP-hopping vandalism. Meters (talk) 03:47, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- guns, bullets, bombs, etc Meters (talk) 03:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:20, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism, i.e. sock of blocked User:Parabellus vandalizing multiple articles.Jingiby (talk) 04:06, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IPs or WP:SPAs have a problem with the word "myth", and change the article in violation of WP:RNPOV. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Tgeorgescu: I protected it this time but in the future please put a more reasonable explanation on the article talk and link to it in edit summaries that revert the change. People who not used to encyclopedic language genuinely have a problem with myth due to general usage and comments should not rub their noses in a policy without a bit of inclusive explanation. By "inclusive" I mean something you would say to a friend over coffee (it that were possible atm), assuming you hoped to keep on friendly terms. Johnuniq (talk) 02:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Targeted vandalism from three separate IPs within the past hour. LEPRICAVARK (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:26, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Different IPs vandalizing the article. TM 01:44, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:31, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 01:57, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive and contentious editing by IP, complete unwillingness to discuss. Gotitbro (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 02:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Clearly a sock[84] trying to delete the article in bad-faith. Hissamelriys (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined. I can't see how semi-protection would help or be justified at this point. SarahSV (talk) 21:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term constant vandalism and BLP violations after each protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:44, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – possible surname difference. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined. There has been move warring but it is not clear which version of the name is correct. Please see my note on the article talk page. MelanieN (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible page; Disruptive editing from IPs . —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined I see only one IP making a few disruptive edits, and I have given them a warning. MelanieN (talk) 20:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data/United States medical cases by state (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Raise in protection level: to template editor protection. IP constantly changing the chart which will confuse readers. They are switching up the deaths and recoveries but the numbers remain unchanged which will confuse readers. StayingClean (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 23:05, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
27 March 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism by IP editors. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Gadfium. — Wug·a·po·des 21:03, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism due to meme. Poydoo (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- {{RFPP}} No edits in two days. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: I edit conflicted with you on this. I protected because it's a disambiguation page that rarely gets constructive edits, and the history is almost entirely unconstructive IP edits. Seemed like a low chance of collateral damage, and prevents vandalism from sticking around if RC patrollers miss it. If you'd still rather decline I'll defer to you since you acted first. — Wug·a·po·des 21:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Wugapodes, nah that's fine. I didn't oppose protecting it too strongly. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Muboshgu: I edit conflicted with you on this. I protected because it's a disambiguation page that rarely gets constructive edits, and the history is almost entirely unconstructive IP edits. Seemed like a low chance of collateral damage, and prevents vandalism from sticking around if RC patrollers miss it. If you'd still rather decline I'll defer to you since you acted first. — Wug·a·po·des 21:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. — Wug·a·po·des 21:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent block evasion. 176.226.241.255 (talk) 19:37, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 04:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Extended confirmed Protection Persistent and vicious disruptive editing by Numerous IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts in the last month. Including some Sock users. Over 13 edits and reverts in the last 9 days. Mr.User200 (talk) 15:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Kansas Bear (talk) 19:10, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:58, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator El C. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Template-protection: Used in editnotice. 2604:3D08:6282:E800:543C:D010:32BE:95B9 (talk) 04:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu — Shouldn't this be Template-editor protected? I was just about to make a request, but the tool doesn't allow me as long as this request is here. All editnotices on main-space are already Template-editor protected by default. Carl Fredrik talk 18:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism from IP edits. The IP edits consistently changes and adds several teams in the tournament bracket which didn't even participate in the competition which gives misinformation about the actual flow (who won or lost) of the competition. Anbans 585 (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This page should be protected for preventive reasons as the same protection is ongoing on pages like the situation in Italy or Germany. Tiagomagalhaes (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent problematic edits by IP, most likely block evasion of User:WorldCreaterFighter per WP:DUCK. Also applies to Brahui language, Dravidian languages, Dravidian peoples, Proto-Dravidian language. Austronesier (talk) 12:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Numerous IPs and non-autoconfirmed accounts engaging in disputed/controversial edits related to WP:ARBAA2. IamNotU (talk) 13:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:35, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection - Persistent vandalism by a proxy IP. Does not seem to be able to stop.BabbaQ (talk) 15:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP and new account vandalism. Tknifton (talk) 17:07, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP gender-related vandalism swapping pronouns around. cave (talk) 03:49, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism and disruptive editing have not ceased since the last page protection which was just three weeks ago. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Recent surge in edit warring and disruptive edits by unregistered editors. Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 04:33, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:21, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Multiple IP editors adding defamatory unsourced statements. Schazjmd (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Note: Page was pending changes protected by administrator Materialscientist shortly after this request was submitted. (Non-administrator comment) Alucard 16❯❯❯ chat? 16:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Too much vandalism for just PC. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism by various IPs and once-and-done accounts. . SummerPhDv2.0 16:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brihaspati (talk) 03:38, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 07:26, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Move protection: Move-semi protect: stop users from moving the page to 1993 Aurora, Colorado shooting as per MOS:GEOCOMMA. TLOM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 09:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- I put a more appropriate tag on the redirect. Doubt it will help, but it sure doesn't hurt. John from Idegon (talk) 10:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 14:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Remainder of unprotected Help:Introduction tutorial pages
Indefinite semi-protection: I request that the remainder of unprotected pages in the Help:Introduction system be indefinitely semi-protected. This is the logical progression from the decision here, as these are all introduction pages very highly referenced by new accounts, and should be semi-protected to prevent them from accidentally seeking help/experimenting there. Sdkb (talk) 17:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:55, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Question: Sdkb, can you specify what pages you think should be protected, so that we can evaluate them? -- MelanieN (talk) 18:07, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @MelanieN: It's all the pages in the Help:Introduction system as linked from that menu, about 60 total. They're transcluded at Help:Introduction to/All if you want to see a list in source code. I can list them out here if you really need me to. Sdkb (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- All 60 pages? Sheesh! Well, I'll take a look at some of them and see if protection seems indicated. If there have not been problems up to now I am going to leave them unprotected. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. After checking several of the areas - policies and guidelines, editing, referencing - I found that they are already protected. I'm done. You do the research, and if you find specific pages that are not protected (hint: look under the "logs" link at the top of the history), come back and request those specific pages. MelanieN (talk) 19:33, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- All 60 pages? Sheesh! Well, I'll take a look at some of them and see if protection seems indicated. If there have not been problems up to now I am going to leave them unprotected. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:28, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- @MelanieN: It's all the pages in the Help:Introduction system as linked from that menu, about 60 total. They're transcluded at Help:Introduction to/All if you want to see a list in source code. I can list them out here if you really need me to. Sdkb (talk) 18:18, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruption by block evading accounts, WP:LTA. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:39, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined It looks like you are correct but their edits are infrequent and use a variety of IPs so normal procedures are ineffective. Please let me know when disruption next occurs (e.g. by putting
[[User:Johnuniq]]
in an edit summary reverting the edit). Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive edits – visibile page due to passenger being confirmed for Covid-19 and the recently death. Most edits are disruptive. See also WP:GS/COVID. 103.103.98.170 (talk) 03:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done I dropped a couple of blocks and will semi-protect for a week; this stuff is stupid. Drmies (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent vandalism and disruptive editing to characters significant other. Though there are some good edits that give good reasons, most edits to these specific regions are either joke edits or don't back anything up. If protected, this will be the second time for the same reasons. Micro (Talk) 23:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @MicroPowerpoint: Next time, please put an explanation on article talk showing why a couple of the edits are inappropriate. I believe you but something more than that would be needed for a third protection. Johnuniq (talk) 02:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Elizium23 (talk) 00:32, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:41, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Requested a few days ago but declined. There has been a steady rate of vandalism by multiple IPs the past few weeks related to recent events. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent WP:BLP violations by User:Kimjiwoo1234. NedFausa (talk) 20:49, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. for edit warring. In the future, WP:ANI or WP:EWN are better venues for single editor disruption. — Wug·a·po·des 21:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi-protection: Ignore the fact that the bot is down. It's transcluded within a semi-protected page. {{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}
PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 21:53, 26 March 2020 (UTC) Request withdrawn
- @Enterprisey: Do you have opinions on protecting your userspace? — Wug·a·po·des 22:11, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn. Page is already indefinitely semi-protected. Double check before you request.
{{SUBST:replyto|Can I Log In}}
PLEASE copy and paste the code to reply(Talk) 23:51, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn. Page is already indefinitely semi-protected. Double check before you request.
- Requesting immediate archiving... — Newslinger talk 23:59, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Continued addition of false/unsourced/poorly sourced material
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. — Wug·a·po·des 01:06, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
28 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today it was launched and many new editors have vandalised article. . Brihaspati (talk) 15:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. MelanieN (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism - especially among Cristiano Ronaldo/Lionel Messi fans trying to change the tables to reflect who they prefer Sudiani (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection., seems to have stopped.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 19:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. —Dimsar01 Talk ⌚→ 17:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Beat you to it! 0;-D MelanieN (talk) 19:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism M4DU7 (talk) 07:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- I do not see why this page currently needs protection but I will appreciate a second opinion.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined for now but a close call (maybe 1 problem edit a day). Let's keep an eye on the page and re-add semiprotection if the current occasional bad edit becomes more frequent. MelanieN (talk) 15:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Some IPs and a new usser, possibly the same adding comments like the subject has "huge biceps and all". . Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Chetsford (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Thanks. PenulisHantu (talk) 18:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. This has been protected more than a dozen times already so there's clearly not going to be a relief in the vandalism at any point soon. While this is fairly slow-moving vandalism, as a BLP Pending Changes would not, I feel, be appropriate for the specific issues this article is encountering. Chetsford (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BTS fans "renaming" of this galaxy continues after previous protection expired. Almost always form new or unconfirmed accounts so semi-protect should be effective. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:32, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 12:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – This article of a person was deleted four times earlier. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Various IPs for last 2 months. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 15:39, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 14:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lots of unauthorized changing the name, related to the current RM discussion. MelanieN (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Sensitive, high-visibility page due to recent claims. Most IP edits disruptive and some are possibly dangerous. See also WP:GS/COVID. 46.163.154.175 (talk) 07:40, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:24, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Once Beyhiveboys got of his 31h edit warring block, the EW has now continued. Please protect the wrong version. MrClog (talk) 09:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 12:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Alex Neman socks
- Kuozui Motors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Daihatsu Ayla (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: IP sockpuppet edits of a banned user: Alex Neman. 182.30.131.127 (talk) 11:19, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Favonian (talk) 11:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing; addition of unsourced and promotional content by multiple COI accounts. 2601:188:180:B8E0:DC8C:D31D:1DDB:9A1A (talk) 02:28, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Please don't bite the newbies—try a gentle explanation before getting officious. Post again if it continues. Johnuniq (talk) 03:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Elizium23 (talk) 05:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:47, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Recurring WP:BLP violations. Sjö (talk) 06:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 08:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This recently came out of a year long semi-protection, at which point the IP vandalism, similar in nature to one year ago, began again. Here are the example from today Special:Contributions/98.155.88.213 Nograpes (talk) 03:13, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Nograpes: That IP has not edited anything else. They should be given a brief explanation of the problem with their edits, with an invitation to discuss proposals at the article talk page. If that were done, the IP could be blocked if they did not discuss but instead made edits that could be shown to be wrong. Johnuniq (talk) 04:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disable PC while you're at it. IanDBeacon (talk) 03:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We have to escalate, so six months should do for now. Johnuniq (talk) 04:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Today it was re-telecasted and many IPs are vandalising page. Brihaspati (talk) 04:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. More COVID-19 excitement. Johnuniq (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: One vandal is removing some vital information. Call me when you get the chance 00:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Call me when you get the chance: Please do not use colorful edit summaries, particularly not when reverting what you believe to be vandalism. That sort of response only encourages a vandal because they can see their efforts are causing an emotional reaction. Per WP:DENY, it is best to be very bland with "rvv" or a rollback being all that is needed for edits that meet Wikipedia's vandalism definition, or messages like "see talk" (where there is an explanation on the talk page about why the edits are undesirable). Johnuniq (talk) 02:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry for the "colorful" edit summaries. I didn't mean to be angry. Call me when you get the chance 03:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Unsourced edits and vandals to the page. Probably needs a short semi protect until the popularity of the netflix special simmers a little bit. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:53, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Increasing level of IP vandalism, unsourced additions, reverting, racist overtones in some previous edits, spread of disinformation. Given that the page now gets more than 15,000 views per day I would kindly ask for an extended period of protection if possible, so we don't have to worry about random IPs during the foreseeable duration of the pandemic. Here are two examples just from today - 95.111.127.93 and 77.236.175.131. Skycycle (talk) 02:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi protection: Semi protection until april 1st, as people really can't help themselves and want to start having fun early. (I don't blame them, staying inside is boring, but it's not april fools yet). —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 23:46, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Moonythedwarf: Do you know of an admin who would be familiar with standard procedures for this? If so, please ask them. A very quick look at the history suggested that semi-protection would suffice. Am I missing something? Johnuniq (talk) 02:00, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Johnuniq, This is fair, but I know of no established procedure for this. I'll reduce the requested protection to semi. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 02:03, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected @Moonythedwarf: OK, I hope the protection will expire at 00:00 1 April 2020—we'll see. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Chokoladesu (talk) 00:07, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Full-protection: Continual edit warring. Kansas Bear (talk) 01:39, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Kansas Bear: It looks like semi-protection is enough? Please post again if problems persist. I do not see anything relevant on talk. Johnuniq (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – In the last week, Lilly Singh has been vandalized and had blatant commentary inserted by single-purpose accounts and anons a couple times each day. Is that enough to attract page protection these days? There were also a new account (now at 10 edits) and a couple of anons that made good-faith but not very good edits, and a one anon that made minor productive edits to punctuation. Closeapple (talk) 01:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Several vandalism from IP and new accounts. Emperork (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We try semi-protection first. Post again if more problems. Johnuniq (talk) 01:45, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Transcluded onto Help:Introduction, so potential for high-impact vandalism. No possible conceivable reason non-autoconfirmed editors would want to edit. Sdkb (talk) 21:25, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. I did the same also at Template:Intro to single/styles.css. Johnuniq (talk) 01:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing of WP:BLP. NedFausa (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 23:59, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 01:51, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Binksternet (talk) 23:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Binksternet: Please put an explanation on the article talk page and link to in edit summaries of a revert. After that, post again if problem resumes. Johnuniq (talk) 01:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 01:55, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
29 March 2020
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism since 24 March, but also receives constructive edits from unconfirmed users. Thtatithticth (talk) 14:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @MelanieN: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 21:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Now it has. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated politics-driven BLP violations from various IP editors . Ravensfire (talk) 16:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 17:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 22:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Permanent semi-protection: Persistent vandalism which resumed yesterday now the protection has been lifted. Asked about it, she commented: "Indeed, that would perhaps be a good way to end all this harassment I've been withstanding for several months, if not years". Therefore I am asking for permanent semi-protection. Thank you for your kind understanding, Comte0 (talk) 14:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I can't quite bring myself to make it permanent, because the instances of harassment come at widely separated intervals, the last one six months ago. But when it occurs the harassment is severe, with obvious sockpuppetry as user after user gets blocked/locked and immediately replaced by another one. Probable spillover from the French wiki? MelanieN (talk) 21:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't want to have to do this but there have been persistent IP edits to this page that constitute vandalism. The season has been suspended anyway. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Flix11 (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: This user who requested protection has been blocked.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Bad faith edits by a user who can't even explain their edits. Admins are inactive. Semsurî (talk) 09:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pointless request, since you're both autoconfirmed. Admin inactivity is actually to your advantage, as you both could have been blocked from that page by now. The two of you been edit-warring for the last few days. Not even counting your attempt to weaponise WP:ANI the other day. ——SN54129 10:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129:, Well, then I propose banning the two of us from the page so we are nudged to use the talk-page constructively. --Semsurî (talk) 11:02, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- You have both been warned about edit-warring on 25/26 March and yet the reverts continue! What gives! ——SN54129 11:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Serial Number 54129: I've been waiting for constructive arguments from the other user for days now. This is not the first time these types of edits have taken place in Kurdish-related topics and I've lost my patience. I revert when a bulk of information is removed with no constructive reasoning. [85][86] Nonetheless, this needs to be resolved. --Semsurî (talk) 11:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – This page has a long history of controversial edits by sockpuppets or meatpuppets of the subject of the article. It has been subject of two AfD, the first one closed as "delete". During the second AfD discussion it has been subject of major edits that have transformed the page from a hagiography to an article that respects WP policies. See also Juan Branco#Self-promotion on Wikipedia and [87] (in French).
The page has recently be edited by an IP, and, after a revert, by a WP:SPA, with a clear objective to restore the hagiographic aspect of the page. They are probable sockpuppets or meat puppets of Juan Branco.
In view of this history, an indefinite semi-protection seems the best solution. D.Lazard (talk) 13:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- I do agree for a protection and a ban on both D.Lazard and XInolanIX. The war they have waged through systematic a reverting method is not acceptable, especially since the modifications they aimed at where restoring a neutral and consensual status that had been reached previously, took into account their own and where systematically sourced. The page, equilibrated in its French version and consensual in both until the intervention of XlnolanIX, has been systematically defamed since a few weeks, in a very subtle but efficient way. Basic biographical elements like studies or employement are being deleted with no reasons, as weel as information coming from primary legitimate sources (Reuters, AP, The Guardian), with no reason.
- I wonder about the sockpuppetry indeed, but not in the direction presented by D.Lazard. I suggest that neither him nor XInolanIX intervene on this page anymore and that an administrator implicates itself by looking at the content of the page and the modifications that they have, savagely, tried to prevent. Both contributors assuming to be French, and clearly having an opinion on the matter, the encyclopedia would benefit from them stopping to participate on the matter. Elahadji (talk) 17:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Considering the history of the subject of the article and his well documented cases of creating/editing his own page I guess it was only a matter of time until something like this would happen. The aggressiveness of this attempt is still somewhat surprising... I strongly support the request for an increase in protection. XInolanIX (talk) 19:13, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Berean Hunter. Favonian (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Short-term IP vandalism/BLP violations. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Materialscientist. MelanieN (talk) 21:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruption by IPs. PATH SLOPU 06:29, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. PATH SLOPU 07:06, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 20:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism and BLP violations starting right up after previous protection ended. -- LuK3 (Talk) 17:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Amorymeltzer. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Grand Mufti issue
- Grand Mufti (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Muneeb-ur-Rehman (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Edit fully protected: The pages have been prone to attack and are being vandalized regularly. Requesting these be fully protected. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined, content dispute--Ymblanter (talk) 12:48, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. There seems to be a rash of attacks on cruise ships atm re COVID-19. JohnnyBflat (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism. There's a combined attack on cruise liners atm. I've reverted vandalism on several pages over the last few days. JohnnyBflat (talk) 11:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:49, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Request extended confirmed vandalism. This page very frequently ges vandalised by a large variety of IP editors, probably due to its simple and high visibility subject matter. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:30, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The article is under indefinite Pending Changes protection which is working well. MelanieN (talk) 23:11, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Pending changes: Continuously reverting edits. PATH SLOPU 06:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected., it looks to me more like edit-warring between autoconfirmed users, pending chahges would not help at this point--Ymblanter (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – I don't know why, but all the edits to this article are vandalism. The article was completed a long time ago and is largely done, but for some reason is a constant target for vandalism. It used to have longer protection, and I think we should restore it. Britishfinance (talk) 11:28, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely., let us try pending changes first--Ymblanter (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined @AntiCompositeNumber: I think it's ended for now. See my message at Talk:AutoCAD#Edit war and please notify me if problems resume. Johnuniq (talk) 02:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing disruption by IP-hopping vandal. Dorsetonian (talk) 08:22, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: This article is invoked/subjected to WP:GS/COVID19. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:41, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Adelaide IP addition. Flix11 (talk) 14:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Recent problems from one IP who has been temporarily blocked. Aside from that, the current PC protection seems to be working. MelanieN (talk) 15:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced birthday edits from various accounts, both registered and unregistered. I don't want to stuff the edit history with reverts. This issue has been discussed further in the talk page by other editors. Thanks. BriefEdits (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @BriefEdits: The last protection was in 2016 so am starting with one month. I saw the explanations on talk, but if there is significant doubt about the birth date a simple solution is to remove it. Johnuniq (talk) 02:45, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Johnuniq, makes sense. Thanks — BriefEdits (talk) 03:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism . TheWarOfArt (talk) 02:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @TheWarOfArt: It's a year since it was protected and there is not enough activity to justify long protection. Some of the recent IP edits are not WP:VAND. The problem is that the recent addition is by a student editor who would not be familiar with Wikipedia's procedures. That editor needs just one more edit to become autoconfirmed so semi-protection won't stop them for long. Discussion will be needed with a polite and patient explanation on article talk and possibly an invitation on their talk to engage. Johnuniq (talk) 02:54, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Template has seen increased vandalism and disruptive editing. S.A. Julio (talk) 06:59, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- @S.A. Julio: An IP gave a good edit summary with a rationale in diff. You reverted saying the IP's change was against consensus but there is nothing on talk. Please link to that consensus in your edit summary and preferably post on talk with an explanation. Did the previous discussion say anything about putting
<br>
after "Qualification for the"? Is there something I'm missing? Johnuniq (talk) 08:18, 28 March 2020 (UTC)- I've added further info at Template talk:2019–20 Premier League table, but we can't expect all readers to understand the meaning of a context-less link, and relying on colour is a MOS:ACCESS issue. S.A. Julio (talk) 10:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @S.A. Julio: Thanks for the clear statement. Johnuniq (talk) 02:24, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – I think this topic is subject to DS per ArbCom, and this and similar pages gets vandalism in light of COVID-19. Aasim 23:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. We have to escalate the protection so started with semi. Post again if more justified. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Bruce Aylward (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) B. Aylward avoided questions on Taiwan's legal status during an interview and now all kinds of disruptive edits are pouring in.
Koalava (talk) 23:36, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 02:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temp Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism, along with Richie Tozier. 2pou (talk) 20:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temp Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing vandalism along with Eddie Kaspbrak. 2pou (talk) 20:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:06, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated genre warring. Mediafanatic17 (talk) 22:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Constant short-term vandalism from multiple editors. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:52, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:14, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Several users had changed the content on a Singapore radio station here and there. Please help out. Thanks. TheGreatSG'rean (talk) 17:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. I don't see any discussion on the talk page; please start a discussion and ping the other person. MelanieN (talk) 19:27, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP editor keeps removing sourced content. Their edits have been reverted by multiple editors since December 2019. . Isaidnoway (talk) 18:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Just a single editor causing problems. I gave them a final warning. MelanieN (talk) 19:33, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term disruptive editing and possible sockpuppetry by multiple editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
30 March 2020
Indefinite semi-protection: Near-constant unconstructive editing by IPs and new users which PCP has failed to curb. Philroc (c) 23:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Philroc: I don't think indefinite semi can be justified at this point since the last edit that would have been affected was on 3 March 2020. I can see a fair bit of spam and would semi-protect for a month as a trial, however, what should happen with the current pending changes? I'll keep it if wanted although it can be a small nuisance by requiring acceptance of good edits. Johnuniq (talk) 04:27, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. I think pending-changes protection works well and as intended, and the disruption is not that great overall; I have watchlisted. @Johnuniq: if you think semi-protection is warranted, go right ahead. Lectonar (talk) 08:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – please raise level of protection. – S. Rich (talk) 19:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator TomStar81. Favonian (talk) 19:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to the nature of this page, IP vandalism is unlikely to ever stop for this highly sensitive page. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 21:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected Honestly, I'm seeing less and less reason to not block anyone promoting it on the spot. Supporting QAnon is like arguing that InfoWars is reliable. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – BLP violations and vandalism from multiple IPs after previous protection expired. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: @Deepfriedokra: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Brojam (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent addition of defamatory content by IPs, based upon recent events. It is not an overwhelming amount, but I think it's enough to address. . ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 16:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:52, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: High-profile player in UK COVID-19 stats controversies. Attracting excessive number of edits from new users here to use it like a blog. Please give it a break. Thanks. 82.39.96.55 (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @82.39.96.55: This request cannot be parsed. Please ensure it follows formatting consistent with the current or previous methods of submission.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- How so, dear bot? It looks as close I could make it. Do you do followup calls? 82.39.96.55 (talk) 23:00, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Vandalism by driveby IPs. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:47, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:06, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent removal of redirect. Polyamorph (talk) 14:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 16:08, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Consistent BLP violations from a number of anonymous sources. Lava Lamps (talk) 09:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- As far as I am concerned, pending changes protection is working as expected.--Ymblanter (talk) 09:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. (for the bot) MelanieN (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Aasim 05:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @Awesome Aasim: There should be an explanation on the article talk page, and a link to that discussion in edit summaries that revert the change. The reference does not look very reliable although I have no idea how much credibility that source has. If there is no good source, removing the birth date might be best. Johnuniq (talk) 06:58, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 10:04, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. Lectonar (talk) 10:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. 1990'sguy (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one day, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protected by another admin. Johnuniq (talk) 05:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:38, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Protection needs to be escalated, if need is demonstrated. Johnuniq (talk) 05:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Binksternet (talk) 04:56, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Problems with anonymous editors changing sourced data without reading the notes they are deleting or looking at the talk page continue to be an issue. There have been no valid changes to the article since at least February.[88] with nothing in the article being changed, except for the worst, semi-protection would seem to be more effective that pending changes. AussieLegend (✉) 05:03, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Bosnia related articles
- List of Ottoman Grand Viziers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Bosniaks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Demographic history of Bosnia and Herzegovina (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- Hersekzade Ahmed Pasha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: High level of set of IP-s vandalism. Jingiby (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:50, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Applies to Bosniaks and Demographic history articles. MelanieN (talk) 23:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. This appears to be a disagreement between two autoconfirmed users; no attempt has been made to discuss at the talk page. Applies to List and Hersekzade articles. MelanieN (talk) 23:53, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editors, by way of adding unsourced/poorly sourced content to the page. livelikemusic talk! 01:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Non consensus membership changes. Jimi Henderson (talk) 02:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of six months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 05:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes is inadequate to control recent vandalism. Jasper Deng (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 04:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Short-term IP and non-autoconfirmed vandalism and addition of unsourced content. . -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: People (IPs or unconfirmed account holders) still constantly add unsourced gossip about his love life nearly everyday. ⌚️ (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 23:58, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Death hoax IP vandalism (Prine is currently hospitalized with COVID-19 symptoms). Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 23:03, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 02:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
31 March 2020
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. JavaHurricane 13:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed: Persistent disruptive editing – An IP and a newly created account has been trying to whitewash this BLP for a few days now. The edit warring is disruptive. Ifnord (talk) 14:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed: Persistent vandalism – The page is regularly being edited with disruptive things. Requesting for ECP for indefinite period. Sony R (talk) 15:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. MelanieN (talk) 21:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: IP hopping vandal changing dates very persistently. Toasted Meter (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —Tom Morris (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Sir Sputnik: You protected this article in early February mentioning block evasion in the edit summary. I notice a new user active since 27 March 2020. There are several IPs active as well. Do you have a recommendation? Johnuniq (talk) 06:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- The block that was being evaded has since expired, so block evasion is no longer a concern. However, the disruptive editing that made the block necessary in the first place continues. Since this has been going on since at least December, I've gone ahead and protected the page for 3 months. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Sir Sputnik. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Disruptive editing from IPs as well as fresh accounts, and unsourced changes. 2409:4073:108:6B07:B835:2458:DBE4:EC2B (talk) 09:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. M4DU7 (talk) 12:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 12:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. XXX8906 (talk) 12:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:28, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Block evasion by User:Maz246810. Binksternet (talk) 14:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Spencer. Favonian (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by unregister editors who keep adding an producer who is not the actual record producer of the album. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing by a number of IP editors. Edits by them are proving problematic; level of protection requested aimed at dissuading the trouble being caused. GUtt01 (talk) 17:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Wikipedia policy page has been a target for vandalism from IP editors. Indefinite protection needed. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 16:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected – Indef. Over the last year this page has been vandalized by IPs as many as 15 times. For a page in active development this might be tolerated, but there isn't much logic in allowing continued vandalism on this kind of page given the rare chance of a good-faith edit. EdJohnston (talk) 16:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/Administrator instructions (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: Full-protection is unnecessary for this page, only semi (EC if you're feeling rather skittish) protection should be used on this page. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 03:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not unprotected Admin noticeboard banners are frequent targets for vandalism by sockpuppets and sleeper accounts (See WP:HIGHRISK). Since admins are the only ones following those instructions, it only needs to be maintained by administrators. There's no benefit to increased editing and a lot of potential downsides. — Wug·a·po·des 04:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Removal of move protection: Move-protected by the now largely inactive John Reaves, apparently to tackle an instance of move vandalism. I'm not sure why this should still be needed 13 years later, especially given that not long after the protection was applied, the article concerned was re-created at a different title. – Uanfala (talk) 15:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Unprotected. Favonian (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing and removal of sourced claims by the user User:BlewsClews. Saxones288 (talk) 16:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. Saxones288 you should both discuss on the talk page. Editors may be blocked for edit warring even if they don't violate the three-revert rule. — Wug·a·po·des 00:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fix ping @BlewsClews and Saxones288: — Wug·a·po·des 00:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite template protection: High-risk template. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 19:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. The page is already indefinitely semi-protected, and that seems to be working fine. There's 800 transclusions which is a lot but I don't think enough to warrant template protection which would prevent a lot of current editors from participating. — Wug·a·po·des 03:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Aasim 19:42, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. Already pending changes protected, and semi-protection risks collateral damage. — Wug·a·po·des 03:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IP insists on making innapropriate changes. As I said, he's most likely a right wing troll. I request temporary protection of the page. --Bageense(disc.) 09:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 09:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 09:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Targeted vandalism. Repeated attempts at manipulating sourced content. Please make sure to undo further vandalism if any before protecting. 2409:4073:20D:7AA7:A9FA:9AE1:2623:F36B (talk) 09:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced hyperbolic content. 2409:4073:20D:7AA7:A9FA:9AE1:2623:F36B (talk) 09:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: I don't see a need for 30/500 protection on this page, considering that all vandalism was conducted by IP users. feminist (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm a pragmatist and see no benefit for such a tempting redirect (Pooh is a redirect to Winnie-the-Pooh) to have only semi protection. Talk:Pooh has never been used for an edit request. Johnuniq (talk) 06:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined Indeed, just too tempting. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and disruptive editing by IPs. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 06:26, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. 1 disruptive edit in the last 10 days. Lectonar (talk) 06:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. BlameRuiner (talk) 08:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. @BlameRuiner: You will need to explain on article talk that rumors are not sufficient and a reliable source will be needed before the article is changed. Then you will need to invite the new editor (who is autoconfirmed and will not be affected by the semi-protection) to discuss the issue. Johnuniq (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Page is currently protected since 2017 due to repeated recreation. The person has increased dramatically in notability in past years, and I believe he now meets the WP:GNG. There is currently a discussion on the talk page. The admin who last protected the page is deceased, and the admin who protected the page before that did not respond to my outreach. I am willing to draft an article for approval first, but the draft page is also protected. This is my first time requesting a reduction in protection level, so apologies if I have made a mistake. Mukedits (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Mukilteoedits: I have unprotected Draft:Scott Disick so you can edit it. I interpret the admin-only protection as requesting an admin review any proposed article before recreating the article, so I don't feel comfortable unprotecting the main article until there's some content to put there. — Wug·a·po·des 04:49, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Er, no. No. Jesus Christ. Just no. WP:SALT is absolutely not a mandate that only admins have the authority to judge whether an article is acceptable. We are not article gatekeepers, and I encourage you to dash any notion that "admin proposed article reviews" are a thing. They're not. SALTing is merely a temporary page protection meant to prevent disruption. The community is who has the authority to decide whether articles are notable. The most recent community consensus was to allow new draft. So you're right in unprotecting the draft article. But your interpretation of why you're doing so is completely wrong. ~Swarm~ {sting} 07:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done Procedural. Lectonar (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: In spite of recently closed Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Medicine-related articles/RFC on pharmaceutical drug prices, several WPMED editors repeatedly reinserting text removed, per RFC without adequate discussion. (Starting with 06:16, March 29, 2020, text removed by five editors, reinstated multiple times by two editors.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @SandyGeorgia: Do you mean full protection due to edit war? Johnuniq (talk) 06:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, I see this was not a logical request (the first time I have tried submitting via Twinkle, and I did not get it right). Yes, that would imply full protection rather than semi, wouldn't it :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 06:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Articles related to COVID-19 pandemic
- 2020 Summer Olympics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- COVID-19 drug development (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- 2020 Hubei lockdowns (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- NHS Nightingale Hospital (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Spain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- World Health Organization (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite semi-protection: Highly sanctioned by the Wikipedia community, per WP:GS/COVID19. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Also, 2020 Summer Olympics was already protected by MelanieN. — Wug·a·po·des 03:39, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Disruptive editing by a few new editors. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Johnuniq (talk) 06:15, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Just hours after the protection tag was removed, POV pushing returned from an IP. TM 19:43, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. the IP is adding sourced information, and an uninvolved editor on the talk page agrees that the IP's addition is sane. — Wug·a·po·des 03:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. — Wug·a·po·des 01:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 04:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Frequent target for vandalism. Paleontologist99 (talk) 03:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected indefinitely. — Wug·a·po·des 04:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Jetstreamer Talk 16:13, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done Good when reported but stale now. I warned the user, but post at WP:EWN if they keep reverting. Otherwise I don't think page protection is needed as the edit war seems to have stopped. — Wug·a·po·des 00:30, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Return of IP-hopping vandalism after recent end of previous protection. Page has been consistently vandalized despite multiple protections. Why keep doing this? Putwood (talk) 00:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- (above request created after semi-protection for one year) – A year seemed reasonable, given the indefinite pending changes protection beneath. Feel free to make it an indefinite one. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. The vandalism seems to return right after protection is removed nearly every time. I think the vandal(s) are looking at the protection log and just waiting for it to expire; Indef discourages them from waiting it out because they don't know when unprotection will happen. With respect to ToBeFree I think indef protection with manual unprotection in about a year is more likely to help the problem long term. — Wug·a·po·des 03:54, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP-hopping, block-evading sock whitewashing article. Toddst1 (talk) 01:34, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Kinu. — Wug·a·po·des 03:58, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary Semi-protection: Repeated BLP-vandalism by IPs in the past day or two. Chubbles (talk) 02:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. If the disruption returns after the protection, it may be worth looking into a range block. — Wug·a·po·des 04:11, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- SpongeBob SquarePants (season 1) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- SpongeBob SquarePants (season 2) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Also SpongeBob SquarePants (season 2)- continued disruptive editing and unsourced date changes, including using WP:NOTRS sources. Magitroopa (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The recent problems are an edit war that's died down, but there are problems with unsourced information going back a while that justify PC protection to bring more eyes to the article. — Wug·a·po·des 03:16, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. There's still some good faith anonymous editing that I don't want to get in the way of, but if it gets worse in the coming days request an increase in protection. — Wug·a·po·des 03:20, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 03:22, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 18:50, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Nthep. — Wug·a·po·des 02:55, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Permanent protection: This is being repeatedly recreated, needs salting W42 19:10, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Cabayi. — Wug·a·po·des 02:56, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Repeated adding of unsourced birthdate by IP editors. Nat Gertler (talk) 19:18, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 02:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full page protection: Persistent disruptive restoration of unsourced tunnel length contrary to WP:BURDEN. Claim of tunnel length of 15.003 metres, an impossible accuracy in 2020 (the mountain would expand and contract more than that). Best reliable source found claims "approximately 15 km". No serious attempt by user:ZH8000 to discuss on talk other than to post abuse and bludgeon irrelevant policy (mostly directed at the attempt to discuss rather than the article). -RFenergy (talk) 15:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Consider the edit warring noticeboard – This is a case of possible edit-warring by one or two users. — Wug·a·po·des
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Addition of personal mobile number by multiple IP addresses. Please see history. GSS 💬 17:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected indefinitely. along with revision deletion and an email to the Oversight team. GSS in the future, you should report problems like this to the oversight team rather than wait for admins to get around to page protection. Thanks for your help! — Wug·a·po·des 01:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Multiple editors keep adding details about an alleged sexual assault. Because of poor sourcing, the matter is currently being discussed in an RfC. Requesting temporary page protection with the contentious material excluded until the RfC is concluded. Scjessey (talk) 17:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Fully protected indefinitely. Will explain on the talk page in the RfC. — Wug·a·po·des 01:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – anon users changing country names. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 00:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. 2.O.Boxing 16:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 00:38, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – anon user changing historic country names; already over 10 times this month. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:57, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — Wug·a·po·des 00:41, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Aasim 17:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done Semi protected for 3 days, after which it will be pending changes protected for an additional week (10 days total protection) I've got conerns about ongoing disruption, but there are good IP edits in the recent history so I don't want it locked down too long. — Wug·a·po·des 00:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)