User talk:CNMall41

Help Me - Mistaken Subject matter!

Help me - I have written a short biography draft on Paul Rantao, a prominent Politician in Botswana. I am not sure how to navigate to an article about another person as opposed to an article about self. I was merely creating my account before I wrote and published the article. Now I am told that I cannot write about myself, which is not my intention. Please help me to title the page appropriately. This page will be open to any editor to add or edit information. Bandie Rantao (talk) 03:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bandie Rantao:, thanks for the message. Trust me, I understand how Wikipedia can be confusion, especially when first starting. First, I would steer you to WP:COI, the guideline that talks about conflicts of interest. It is okay if you have one, but it is best to disclose such. Second, review WP:FIRST as this will help guide you in how to start the draft. Currently there are no sources in the draft which is why it was declined by another user. I did a quick search and see the person is mentioned in a lot of sources, namely in Google Books. This would be a good start for sourcing (Google Books that is). Finally, I the notice about it being an autobiography is just a guide for you, not necessarily a warning. It helps inform you of some guidelines and policies to keep in mind if you should be the subject of the page (although it sounds like WP:COI would be the better link based on your above disclosure). If you need help navigating after reading those guidelines and adding sources, please let me know. Good luck!--CNMall41 (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your advise! I hope to get it right, and I hope I can always count on you to guide me along the way! Bandie Rantao (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi again, I hope you can help me. Where do I go to disclose a conflict of interest? I went to the page WP:COI but I cannot navigate my way to the link for that. Bandie Rantao (talk) 03:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

@Bandie Rantao:, I made the disclosure for you at Draft talk:Paul Rantao. You can also do so on your userpage if you wish but what I did on the talk page will suffice. You can also see WP:DISCLOSE if you wish to change it. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:30, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Botband78 (talk) 05:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Sorry for not being able to reply

Hi,I am sorry I couldn't reply you at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanvaas in time. I was away for a while. What I meant was, I could feel that notability issue was not there, going through discussion. But as release date was only a few days away, deleting the article altogether could have been avoided. It was there throughout when no release date was even announced, and no one knew when.Awsib (talk) 16:22, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Not sure what you are saying. The discussion was closed and then the page was bludgeoned back to mainspace a few days later. This is the reason why I will no longer advocate to draftify pages that don't meet guidelines. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

About recent edit request response at Talk:George Gadson

You marked the request as done without closing the request, next time, make sure to change the "answered=no"(or "ans=no") parameter to "answered=yes" (or "ans=yes"). I have done this for you, just remember to make sure you close requests when you answer them. Shadow311 (talk) 18:25, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

@Shadow311:, I use the COI response script and forgot to check the completed box. Thanks for closing. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:03, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Request on 00:16:03, 20 January 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by Callmehelper

• Callmehelper (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tina Dabi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Firstly, thanks for response so quickly. As previously this page of Tina Dabi was rejected, i don't know how much the content that page accomodated at that time. So i can't comment on that. But as far as my creation of this page is concerned, it is well structured, cover all the major policy required for the any page such notability, GNG , Varifibility, etc. It has her all government posts , her govt led program, popularity, controversy etc. Probably there is not a single Reputable newspaper of india left who independently won't cover her at different different events. I mentioned all of them at very NPOV. So I request you to please take a time for review this article. i am sure it will definately qualify to be here as a article.
Thanks. Much Regards. Callmehelper (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Callmehelper:, Can you list the sources that have come out since the last AfD discussion which you feel cover her in-depth? Notability is not about how well a page is structured, it is about the sourcing. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41 , its me @Callmehelper
Its about Tina Dabi
Something got wrong here. i can't reply to you . it seems invisible for me. it's not working. should i reply here the all the sources that I think is left that previous time? Callmehelper (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

You do not need to create a separate heading on this talk page. We can keep it all under one. You can reply with the information at Draft talk:Tina Dabi. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:30, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Help me

Hi i saw your comment, as im doing it for the first time i dont know to much about how to do it, can you help me in doing this article live its a movie page releasing in india im the producer of the movie i have all the data related to it, please help me on how to solve the error i will provide you all the data and link and you do it for me? Rbofficial17 (talk) 03:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@Rbofficial17:, thank you for the disclosure. I am willing to assist in any way I can based on your transparency. Since you do have a conflict of interest, disclosure would be required per WP:COI. I made the disclosure for you on the talk page of the draft. I also left a notice at the task force talk page here as there are experienced editors who will be able to provide a second opinion and assist in the draft.In the meantime I would advise reading WP:FIRST. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:52, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

hi now I have added the Critical response also added there links in it and edited some text which was not grammatically correct and also added the link of the official song released on YouTube Rbofficial17 (talk) 16:54, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Will take a look. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Toxic (film)

The Keep comments annoyed me because they seemed superficially correct, and overlooked the restricted definition of notability and so of significant coverage of unreleased films. I had other things to be doing also, but I thought that one was likely to get through otherwise. At least I didn't have to do machine translation, which I often do on these unreleased Indian films. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:55, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. Congrats on the move as well (stalked your talk page). The film space, especially surrounding India and Pakistan is getting very frustrating, especially with many editors overlooking the UPE and SOCK bludgeoning (not necessarily applicable to this AfD). Note that one of the Keep votes is a SOCK and based on this I can tie to them to another sock farm. Just not pursuing as for some reason I cannot seem to get anyone's attention willing to look at behavioral evidence instead of relying solely on CU evidence. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

kathanar

Hi i will make it shortened,please allow me to change the cast as orderwise which will be easy for users to identify Hashin100 (talk) 08:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

This is a great edit as it reduced the plot. As far as the cast, no issues with adding as long as they are actually part of the cast and can be verified. --CNMall41 (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Pacha Group page update

Hi there, hope you're well. I see you have reverted the Pacha Group page due to concerns about promotional tone, thanks for pointing that out. I ran the updated text by one of the other mods (Mean as custard) yesterday, who was confident it was ok to publish. I'm more than happy to work on it some more. Are there any particular parts that need work, or should be removed altogether? Thankyou. Appreciate your input here. Mgoldenbarnes (talk) 08:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

@Mgoldenbarnes:, They did not approve what you wrote as-is. We can keep the discussion on their talk page since it started there. If you would, please address the question that was posed about COI and PAID. Once you do that, we can move forward with a discussion. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:42, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Question

You moved the page Nath (TV series) to Nath – Zewar Ya Zanjeer and you gave the reason, "You will need to discuss the move," but the discussion has already taken place on the article's talk page. Kiapkihtrak (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Are you referring to the old discussion that was started by a SOCK, voted in by other socks? Let's not play games. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:42, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cambashi logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cambashi logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ankur Nagpal

Hello, CNMall41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ankur Nagpal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:23, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nacelle Company

Hello, CNMall41. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nacelle Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Nuke it. I created the redirect, not the draft. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

This is about an academic, and there are eight criteria here. Also, lots of material has been sourced

originally it was about eight criteria, of which 1 has been met. Now what? 79.250.56.138 (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

This is about Gabriele Scheler. That entry has been significantly altered. Lots of sources including wikipedia internal links. Also references to secondary sources. Originally this was an academic article and one of the criteria was met. But somehow this changed. This is a person from academia, so references to published articles is normal. Not clear what is missing. Some bot automatically rejects. Globalist01 (talk) 23:17, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

@Globalist01:, I think the first thing that needs to happen is you disclose your WP:COI, as well as the names of any alternative account you are using. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:18, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hegde, again

The sock is back at Pooja Hegde's article to white-wash and edit-war once again. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 09:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

Question Regarding Notability Criteria for Faheem Mazhar

Dear CNMall41, Thank you for reviewing my submission for **Faheem Mazhar**, a notable Pakistani classical vocalist. I appreciate your time and feedback. I understand that the article was declined due to concerns about notability and independent coverage. However, I would like to clarify a few points and request guidance: 1. **Comparative Notability** – There are multiple articles on Wikipedia about classical vocalists with **comparatively weaker references**, yet they are still accepted. Given that classical music is a vanishing art form, it is important to document notable figures like Faheem Mazhar who have significantly contributed to the preservation and dissemination of this tradition. 2. **Existing Coverage and Cultural Significance** – While Faheem Mazhar’s media coverage may not be as extensive as some mainstream artists, he has been featured in **Dawn, The News International, and other reputable sources**, and has collaborated with internationally recognized artists like **Nitin Sawhney and Akram Khan**. His work has also been acknowledged in academic studies related to **Hindustani classical music**. 3. **Seeking Guidance** – Could you kindly advise on what **specific types of sources** would be sufficient to establish notability in this case? If additional references are needed, I am happy to continue searching for more substantial coverage. I genuinely appreciate your insights and any direction you can provide. Looking forward to your response. Best regards, [حسنین چوہدری] حسنین چوہدری (talk) 02:57, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

I would suggest starting at WP:RS to understand what a reliable source would be. There is also some content in the draft which is not cited so I suggest either removing that or adding a source to support. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:52, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your edit on Dil Wali Gali Mein

Hi User:CNMall41, I noticed your recent edit on Dil Wali Gali Mein and have undone it because the page is meeting with basic WP:GNG. The page views are growing day by day and also edited by many editor including IPs. If you'd like to discuss this, feel free to reply here. Thanks! PB987 (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Notability is not about page views. We can let AfD decide I guess. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Recent edits of my reverted

I am telling this to you since you told me to tell you on your talk page. I have made constructive edits on pages such as Ghum Hai Kisi Key Pyaar Mein like family relations. And you said that they are not constructive and according to me, you make a mistake. So please recheck it and if possible, add the things that you erased as I typed them giving my time to improve Wikipedia. Sjsjkd (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

No, your edits are not constructive. They violate WP:TVCAST. Your editing in a similar manner as two other accounts as well which gives the impression you are using multiple accounts. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Please tell me how they violate WP:TVCAST and no, I don't use multiple accounts. Can't more than one person has the same editing manner? Sjsjkd (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

You put too much information. You will need to read the guideline. I cannot help you further. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Funny. You requested to be unblocked despite not being blocked. Makes me think it was another account you were confused with. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

I was blocked earlier. But weirdly that block was removed without any information. Sjsjkd (talk) 05:47, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Except you show no history of being blocked in the block log. Try again. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

According to me that information is valid and too much information, according to me, is like putting relatives like aunt-in-law by marriage. Sjsjkd (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia, it is too much information. I cannot help you further so please stay off my talk page. Feel free to use the talk page of the article should you feel the information should be included. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AKM Semiconductor logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AKM Semiconductor logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:BelCompany logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BelCompany logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for educating about WP:COAT

I reverted IP’s edit for other reasons such as biased word they used in summary, at Dev Pragad, but the case was COAT which is fair, thanks. Jsphere25 (talk) 11:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Kiran. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Bro what are you doing? Star Kiran owned by Disney+ Hotstar? [[1]] UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

@United Blasters:, thanks for the template. Very aware of unconstructive editing which is one of the warnings you were given. I would suggest getting familiar with WP:ONUS as its easier and more productive than edit warring. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:41, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Regarding Ramayana: Part 1

Bud, engage in meaningful discussion regarding edits, because you do not one give one good reason why you revert back when someone else edits. Many of the sources mentioned in the article have been thoroughly researched, but even if you find that some source is not verifiable, or is malicious, you either talk to the editor, or you change ONLY that portion. But you do not seem to think that necessary, and you revert all the edits to go back to the one you deem fit. I encourage you to talk more, so we can resolve issues peacefully and in good faith. Sribrahma (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

The page should be speedy deleted. See the discussion for why I didn't do that. You obviously do not care about Wikipedia process as you moved this right back to the mainspace two weeks after the other AfD was completed. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Clarification

Bro, I clear about that, Disney+ Hotstar is only a OTT Platform, how it own a channel named Star Kiran? Star channels are Owned by JioStar or Disney Star. Disney+ Hotstar is a OTT platform from Disney Star. Also, i am now aware of Edit Warring. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 13:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say. I did look closer at Star Kiran though and it may not even be notable. Regardless, these types of discussions are for the talk pages of those articles which I have tried to tell you several times. I am only one opinion so those pages are better in order to gain consensus for what you are trying to include. --CNMall41 (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jayco Logo 2019.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jayco Logo 2019.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nacelle Company

Hello, CNMall41. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Nacelle Company".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 06:23, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Rumble

Thanks for all your efforts, especially for keeping this article from going off the rails. I hoped to make a small & worthwhile improvement, but your reversion edit here makes clear you think my effort missed the mark.
This leaves a bit of a hole in the article where it could be improved by reflecting more of the citation content. One of these (paywalled) mentions "misinformation & conspiracy theories" on Rumble after the YouTube expulsion. The other is more specific, naming "Anti-Vaccine Propaganda" and detailing the notable anti-vaxx trio already mentioned in the article (Bigtree, Tenpenny & Gold).
So, what's the best way to improve the article with this citation content? What do you think?
Cheers! Bluevista99 (talk) 03:33, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

What I am hearing is not how to improve, but how to add the terms to describe a person. Regardless of the reference, it is a WP:NPOV issue and WP:COAT. The NPOV issue is that by using an adjective to describe a person (good or bad) attempts to say that their association with a company makes that company good or bad. The COAT issue is pretty simple. If that person has a Wikipedia page, describe it there as it belongs there, not coat racked in other pages. --CNMall41 (talk) 06:10, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

It also seems that others have address this with you as well.--CNMall41 (talk) 06:12, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Biographies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:B. R. Ambedkar on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Primavera Capital Group Deals

Hello @CNMall41

Hope you are doing well. Wanted to liaise with you on your comment: 'Again, how are these notable? If they are sourced, part of the history, written in prose, and encyclopic, then they are find but we shouldn't be starting a list again'

- Wanted to align on: 'notable' deals to ensure that the content quality is high.

I had added some of the deals in the list with the below criteria to be terms as 'notable':

1. Covered by Reuters, Bloomberg or Nikkei (basically top reputed/reliable publication)
2. The firm in which the investment was done has a Wikipedia page
3. The investment amount was substantial (at least a few hundred Million)

Additionally, if 'notable' is still not an appropriate term, my approach would be to create sub sections for deals (under History section or otherwise); such as: ESG related, F&B & Others (to ensure it's just not a random list); limiting 2-3 deals in each of the sub-section.

Please do let me know, if you want this conversation on the page talk section; can move there to avoid filling your talk page. Thanks

PS: I don't have any conflict of interest for the page, neither am I linked to the firm. WorldPeace888 (talk) 02:36, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@WorldPeace888:, yes, it would be better to put this on the talk page as that is where discussions on content should be held. The term "notable" should be replaced with "noteworthy" in my opinion. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:41, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41 Thanks for the clarification on the terminology. Will initiate the discussion on the page 'talk' page before making edits to the page to ensure other editors can see it too.

Since after your comment it seems one of the editors removed all the deals from the page & I believe that a page of an 'investment firm' should have some noteworthy deals mentioned on the page. Thanks WorldPeace888 (talk) 04:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

I would say it is important to focus on what guidelines allow, not what you believe is deserved because it is an investment firm. --CNMall41 (talk) 08:19, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

@CNMall41 Noted! WorldPeace888 (talk) 07:41, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Officer on Duty

Hi there! Could you please help me understand why you reverted my bot's edit on the Officer on Duty article? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 03:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

@GoingBatty:, Sorry, nothing to understand other than it was my own fuck up. My intention was to revert the IP edit but did the wrong one. They had added that spam link to several pages which you can see I warned them about on their talk page. Hope it didn't throw off the bot. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Ira Leviton kindly fixed the issues manually, so my bot didn't visit the article again. I just don't like my bot to be in an edit war with a human. Thanks, and happy editing! (P.S> Editing this page in dark mode is very challenging, as I'm typing black text in a black box.) GoingBatty (talk) 01:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

INDIAToday - A question on Reliability

Good day sir, I would like to seek clarification regarding the reliability of India Today as a source, particularly in the context of Indian film-related articles. Given its long-standing reputation as a major Indian news publication, it is frequently cited across Wikipedia, especially in articles concerning Indian actors, actresses, and their filmographies.

However, I have noticed discussions questioning its reliability, and I would appreciate an official stance on this matter. Many actor/actress filmography pages rely heavily on India Today as their primary source for casting announcements, box office performance, and critical reception. If India Today is considered unreliable, should these citations be re-evaluated, and are alternative sources required? Conversely, if it is deemed generally reliable, should there be any specific limitations or considerations when using it?

A formal clarification on this matter would greatly help ensure consistency across Wikipedia’s coverage of Indian cinema. I appreciate your time and guidance on this issue.

Happy editing! 45.64.224.115 (talk) 09:21, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

See WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Just because a publication may have a "long-standing reputation as a major Indian news publication" (the statement itself is debatable) does not mean that all content published by the outlet is reliable. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Sheheryar Munawar Siddiqui "Lead" Edit Revert

Hi!

You said that you reverted my edit because I used a "Unreliable source". Isn't the digital network which broadcasts the show a good enough reliable source to present an actor as "Lead" in a TV series or drama.

Thanks!

- @CrypticAi06 CrypticAi06 (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Just stop, please. We do this every time when you create a new account. Stay off my talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

I am so sorry, but I genuinely don't know what you mean by new accounts. This is my only account. I am really new here so can you explain what I did wrong, or I am doing wrong?

I would really appreciate it! CrypticAi06 (talk) 18:40, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

No need to do anything. SPI was filed. Again, stay off my talk page. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Willing to have a second look at most recent LPL Financial COI edit request?

Good afternoon - Sorry to disturb you on your Talk page (I don’t intend on making a habit of it!) but after your review of the first edit request I submitted on LPL Financial’s behalf, I wondered if you’d be willing to have a second look at a request we submitted on January 2nd – specifically the requests under “Acquisitions” and the “Legal” sections.

I understand that the “Operations” add we sought may be too promotional in nature as the last editor stated, so I’m not opposed to forgoing that one. But, for the other sections, we’re merely seeking to re-establish some structure around the page, improve sourcing for existing information and correct/improve some existing content. Addition of couple of additional Acquisitions are requested as well.

We’re not understanding how these particular asks under Acquisitions and Legal are deemed promotional as they align with how I’ve categorized them above, but unfortunately, the editor who deemed all of our asks as purely promotional is not responding. Wondering if you’d be willing to have a second look and let us know if our Acquisition and Legal-related asks are acceptable?

If you deem they are (either as a whole or in part), would you be willing to make those edits or grant us permission to do so? Again, we would NOT seek addition of the Operations request as we can see how that’s likely drifting into promotional territory.

Thanks for your time and consideration. Jon Gray (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

@Jon Gray:, I took a quick look but wouldn't be willing to implement anything. The first section I looked at was a "legal" section which I am against per WP:NOCRIT. Adding sections such as these are the opposite of promotional and are more POV-pushing when calling them out. I would suggest requesting edits in smaller chunks, starting with those you feel absolutely meet guidelines. Use the edit request feature again and someone monitoring COIN will be along to review. Good luck. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:02, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks - Appreciate your input! Jon Gray (talk) 19:28, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

JioStar

@CNMall41: I wanted to draw your attention to a discussion taking place on the Talk:Disney Star regarding the "Owner" information in the infoboxes of JioStar channels. You previously had removed "JioStar" as the stated owner and proposed a discussion on the talk page to work out the best way to describe the ownership structure, after which I initiated this discussion. We've had some other editors providing their input as well. Including @Vestrian24Bio: and @Trailblazer101:. As it currently stands, based on the sources provided [2] [3] , consensus seems to be leaning towards stating the owner as "JioStar, a Joint Venture between Viacom18 & Disney India." As our current wording appears to show an accurate representation of the joint ownership structure. We would appreciate your thoughts on this wording and any other suggestions you may have, especially considering your initial involvement in this whole matter. So we can ultimately reach some form of shared consensus which will allow for accuracy and agreement with policies on Wikipedia's guidelines. Thank You. UNITED BLASTERS (talk) 13:05, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Draft:Gaurav Dwivedi

I reviewed it once but not very convinced and need you to review the draft. Subject has one lead role in "Gora", and some recognition from support roles in "Rang Rasiya" and "Manji: The mountain man". Recognition is more in passing mention in sources with film reviews. RangersRus (talk) 14:17, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

@RangersRus:. Many issues with that draft, including COI and possible UPE (see the image used). Evaluating from a purely notability perspective, it falls short. I think there are a few in the community here who believe that having two verified significant roles makes someone inherently notable under NACTOR. That is not the case. There still needs to be significant coverage so even if these roles were significant, there are no sources that could be used to show notability. Despite the dissent from some, there are four others who currently agree on the notability not being met. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

TMKOC

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Taarak Mehta Ka Ooltah Chashmah. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tenshi Uisu (talk) 12:49, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

If you are upset, please go right to WP:ANI and report my behavior. Regardless, do not come to this talk page again. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:18, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

ANI report just for sake of documenting. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:15, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Review of Canton Network draft

Hi @CNMall41, thank you for reviewing the draft entry for Draft:Canton Network. Based on your feedback I've added multiple published sources to meet the criteria you mentioned. As this is my first time writing a completely new entry, I'd really appreciate it if you have the time to review the resubmitted draft.

Thank you in advance! Bluetabletastyorange (talk) 19:13, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

@Bluetabletastyorange:, I see you resubmitted the draft so another reviewer will come along and review soon. I still think there are issues which I can opine on, but first would ask you read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the appropriate disclosure. I see somewhat of a disclosure on your userpage but you will need to adhere to the required COI statement in PAID and COI if applicable. Note that it is okay for someone to have a COI or a financial relationship, but it is not okay to avoid the full disclosure. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:14, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Modified Sumit Gupta

Dear Sir, as per your guidance, I have re structured the Sumit Gupta article. Hope it is perfect now. Hoping for your kind help and guidance.