User talk:Dellwood546
Dellwood546, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Dellwood546! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulk Barn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulk Barn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Catorce2016 (talk) 11:13, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Dellwood546! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 2024 Baltimore Bridge Collapse (March 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2024 Baltimore Bridge Collapse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
The picture of the collapse
[edit]Do you know where you got it? It's kinda important for {{Non-free use rationale}}. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, I retrieved the image from [1]this news website. Hope it helps. I will admit my submission was a bit rushed. Dellwood546 (talk) 08:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. To be fair, it's an insane event to see, so it's understandable. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw it pop up on Telegram and decided I should start editing the related wikipedia articles ASAP lmao Dellwood546 (talk) 08:36, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Got it. To be fair, it's an insane event to see, so it's understandable. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 08:35, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Francis-Scott-Key-Bridge-Collapse.jpg listed for discussion
[edit] A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Francis-Scott-Key-Bridge-Collapse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 12:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Francis-Scott-Key-Bridge-Collapse.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Francis-Scott-Key-Bridge-Collapse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semen2 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Francis-Scott-Key-Bridge-Collapse.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Francis-Scott-Key-Bridge-Collapse.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)