Jump to content

User:Doug Weller

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User talk:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
User:Doug Weller/Workshop
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
Special:Prefixindex/User:Doug Weller
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
User:Doug Weller/Userboxes
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Contributions/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
Special:Emailuser/Doug Weller
home
Talk Page
Workshop
Site Map
Userboxes
Edits
Email


IP Rangeblock Calculator IP Range Edit Check Checkusers Oversighters

User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI

User:Spicy/SPI admin guide

Noticeboards
Administrators' noticeboard (37 threads)
Administrators' noticeboard: Incidents (38 threads)
Administrative action review (4 threads)
Edit warring noticeboard (7 threads)
Bureaucrats' noticeboard (1 thread)
Bots noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Committee noticeboard (4 threads)
Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (10 threads)
BLP noticeboard (19 threads)
Fringe theories noticeboard (16 threads)
Original research noticeboard (8 threads)
Reliable sources noticeboard (33 threads)
Neutral point of view noticeboard (16 threads)
External links noticeboard (8 threads)
Conflict of interest noticeboard (15 threads)
Dispute resolution noticeboard (6 threads)
Help desk (19 threads)
Media copyright questions (13 threads)
Teahouse (36 threads)
Village Pump (policy) (17 threads)
Village Pump (technical) (29 threads)
Village Pump (proposals) (9 threads)
Village Pump (idea lab) (21 threads)
Village Pump (WMF) (7 threads)
Village Pump (miscellaneous) (12 threads)

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 18
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 59
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 54
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 1
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 2
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 96
Requested RD1 redactions 6
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 18
Open sockpuppet investigations 79
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review
Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism/TB2
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Pending changes reviewer
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations
Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention/Bot
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject Open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

CSD / PRODs

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 7
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 1
Other candidates 10
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

This box:
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 30 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 103 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 6 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

Usernames for administrator attention


Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


List of coups and coup attempts since 2010

Semi-Protection: Persistent targeting by IP account listing Euromaidan revolution as a coup. Bird244 (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
    Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Talk:Hypergiant

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple disruptive edits and ridiculous mass reverts from sockpuppets of a banned and locked user, who is ignorantly and angrily lashing out on people of quote-unquote "having bias towards VY Canis Majoris as the largest star" even despite my criticism and as well as List of largest stars still having stars with larger radii. Furthermore, this user has been cherry-picking unreliable and biased info like for NML Cygni and UY Scuti in particular such as old radii and status as the largest which likely just came from older Wikipedia revisions (and WP isn't a reliable reference). Just because a ref states a star as the largest star known doesn't mean it should be blindly considered as 100% as the largest depending on other sources and especially the reliable value estimate of the said star (see also an archived discussion). It can be said this sockpuppet creator may be just attempting to rudely force his takes on others rather than discuss in talk page in a civil way. Same goes for other pages this user recently edited like NML Cygni, Red supergiant, Talk:List of largest stars, Stephenson 2 DFK 1, Orders of magnitude (length), and List of star extremes. I apologize if my English was bad. Thanks. Regards—ZaperaWiki44(✉/Contribs) 19:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. There have been no edits at all on this page since September. Did you pick the right page? Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Israeli Navy

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No edits in a couple of months. Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Laken Riley Act

Reason: Anonymous accounts keep replacing the article with terms like "illegal alien" which is inaccurate and dehumanizing. Who the law affects is also under dispute in the talk page and I think it should be edit protected for the time being so we can reach a consensus on what terms to use. LaggyMcStab (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/AP and invoke WP:CRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Chinese New Year

Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for two weeks, i.e. a few days after Chinese New Year ends. Annual uptick in unsourced and vandal edits due to the festival starting, including racist vandalism. Don't need another year of admins having to revert and hide a dozen revisions. Yue🌙 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator JBW. for at least one more day. Let's see how things go when this protection ends. Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Miles in Transit

Reason: Repeated addition of uncited birthdate (BLP issue). May need full protection since it's both IPs and logged-in editors. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Will leave CTOPS notice on talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Keeper of the Lost Cities

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Vandalism on Wikipedia

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seems semi was circumvented here as well. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. All recent socks, indef, by various admins. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Template:Authority control/doc

Indefinite semi-protection: People don't need to be editing this page. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Hōshōryū Tomokatsu

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zinderboff (talk) 02:38, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

2025 Potomac River mid-air collision

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. IP users constantly vandalize the article. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 03:53, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
    Already protected by administrator Cullen328. for a day. Daniel Case (talk) 06:07, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Saint James the Great Parish Church (Bolinao)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Unsourced / disruptive edits from Mutia ti la Union updates sock group, removing sourced information and adding unsourced nonsense. Ravensfire (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of one month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

PSA Airlines

Temporary semi-protection: PSA Airlines is the airline involved in the January 29th mid-air collision near National Airport in DC. Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC) 04:28, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. And the report didn't suggest why protection might be necessary. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Ross Ulbricht

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent IP vandalism over first sentence characterization. guninvalid (talk) 04:40, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Added CTOPS notice (WP:CT/AP) to an already busy talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Pradip Kumar Varma

Reason: This page is frequently subject to vandalism and spam edits by unauthorized users. Due to the high-profile nature of the individual, these disruptive changes are undermining the integrity and accuracy of the content. Requesting semi-protection to restrict editing to only registered users or full protection to ensure that the content remains accurate and reliable. Pkvranchi (talk) 06:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. In fact, you've made the majority of the edits, and I suspect you're the article subject, seeking the sort of pre-emptive protection we almost never grant. Daniel Case (talk) 06:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Opinion polling for the 2025 Canadian federal election

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Zinderboff (talk) 06:17, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/RNE. IanDBeacon (talk) 06:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 10 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. The "R" in RNE stands for "recent", suggesting that the elections needs to have actually been held before we can invoke it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

2 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:Disambiguation (request) 2025-01-18 20:46 Fully protected (log) Modified by Pppery on 2023-09-01: "Upping to full protection as now used by Module:Pagetype"
Template:Short description (request) 2025-01-29 16:37 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/content (log) From Wikipedia/Protected templates: Protected by Rich Farmbrough on 2009-10-14: "Purpose of page - belt and braces."
Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
1 template-protected edit request
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox sports league (request) 2025-01-25 22:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 2000+ transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:34, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Ojsyork

I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

I'm concerned that many of the articles on lifeboat stations don't meet GNG. After looking at a random sampling of them, most of them cite the Lifeboat Enthusiasts Society (of which Martin states they are a member of on their talk page), which appears to be an WP:SPS, and The Lifeboat, a publication of the RNLI, which is not an independent source. voorts (talk/contributions) 03:15, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Voorts I would have thought the same thing when I first encountered these articles, but there are several independent published sources on these lifesaving stations. Whenever I've done a BEFORE search on one, I always find GNG-qualifying sourcing. This came up in an AfD for one of Ojsyork's creations last year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bamburgh Castle Lifeboat Station), which resulted in a "keep". Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Needforname

I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed.

Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required.

Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done. Hello Needforname and thanks for your contributions. All your articles seem to be in need of a decent copyedit, and therefore can use another pair of eyes. The criteria for giving autopatrolled are that the articles need to be 'nearly perfect'. One way to improve the English in your article is to nominate one of your articles at WP:GOCE, and learn from the mistakes that are corrected. Or you can use an LLM and ask it to find grammatical errors. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:12, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ahola .O

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)

(Non-administrator comment) You are currently not adding to the "workload of new page patrollers", in fact, your creations need to be watched closely. Not when I specifically told you here that the pieces you presented to inquire about Bobo Ajudua are thrash and nonsensical and told you to focus elsewhere instead of on an article that has been deleted several times. Yet, you went ahead to create it, and now, it has been deleted again? via AfD. And this? Your creations need to be watched and that is what the NPP is for. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done * Pppery * it has begun... 03:57, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User:SDGB1217

Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

User:C1K98V

Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Could you please point to where the date of birth of Gautam Vig is referenced, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:14, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi @Schwede66, I hope you enjoyed your vacation. I have sourced the DOB in the early life section as per WP:INFOBOXREF. I followed the editing style of Geniac, the way he improved Sheezan Khan and tried adapting the same. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 08:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I had a fab wee holiday. I don't understand your answer. I see that there is one ref in the infobox, and that reference does confirm the date of birth, but it is attached to the spouse only. Could you please explain what you mean, and how the referencing confirms the date of birth, C1K98V? Schwede66 08:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66 In the above mentioned article I have sourced the date of birth in the Early life section, see here. And the spouse's source is just about their marriage. I'm following the editing style of Geniac, the improvement he did in one of my previously created article see here. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, which reference states the date of Vig's date of birth? I cannot see it. Schwede66 18:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Schwede66, I have used two sources for DOB, Colors TV and India Today. You can find both the sources in the Early life section. Hope it helps, if you still can't verify the birth date, you're most welcome to remove it. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 18:50, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
@C1K98V Is it just me or the webpage you're linking to from colorstv.com is redirecting to a /mena/ directory making it impossible to see what you're talking about or citing. As for the indiatoday.in, you did not initially position the citation as of when Schwede66 started reviewing your request, you only repositioned the citation today. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm not sure if the Colorstv website works outside of India. Let's wait for Schwede66 to confirm if they're able to verify it. I'm sharing a screenshot of the website for reference [1]. While searching for sources related to their academics, I found IndiaToday and added it later in the Early life section. I repositioned the named citation as I wanted to highlight it for Schwede66, so I left an edit summary too. Thanks for your consideration. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 03:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I can access the colorstv source and confirm that it mentions Gautam Vig's date of birth. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Walco1

Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards.

I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)

User:बडा काजी

The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Иованъ

It is my 8th year of editing (4th with this account). I have written a number of articles of various types and none have been permanently deleted. I have made mistakes, but understand what they were and how to avoid them. Ivan (talk) 17:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Waddie96

I am requesting AWB rights to assist with repetitive and time-consuming tasks like correcting formatting issues, standardising citation styles, updating outdated links, and organising categories. My goal: improve the quality and consistency of Wikipedia articles with an interest in contributing to medicine/biology. waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

 Already done (automated response): This user already has AutoWikiBrowser access. — MusikBot talk 11:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Jjackson10003

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,

I am writing to request the necessary permissions to enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on my Wikipedia account. I value the security of my account and believe that adding 2FA will provide an additional layer of protection, ensuring the safety of my contributions and the integrity of my account.

My Contributions: Username: Jjackson10003 Account Details: Autoconfirmed user since August 10, 2020, with 10 edits to date. I have actively contributed to Wikipedia by [briefly describe your contributions, such as editing specific articles, creating pages, or participating in discussions]. Reason for Request: As technology evolves, the risk of account hijacking increases, particularly with the rise of AI and changes in regimes that may encourage bad actors to exploit vulnerabilities. Enabling 2FA will significantly reduce the likelihood of unauthorized access to my account and prevent potential misuse. Ensuring account security is critical, both for individual users and for the protection of Wikipedia’s broader community and platform integrity.

While I am currently an autoconfirmed user, I understand that 2FA is typically reserved for users with advanced permissions. I kindly request that I be considered for either extended confirmed user status or temporary access to enable 2FA.

Commitment to Wikipedia Standards: I am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, ensuring that my contributions adhere to community standards. I believe that my request aligns with the shared goal of maintaining a secure and trustworthy environment for editors and the broader Wikipedia community.

Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if there is any additional information or clarification needed. I am happy to provide further details about my contributions or intentions.

Sincerely, Jjackson10003 Jjackson10003 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done We do not consider requests that were rather obviously generated by AI. --Kinu t/c 16:02, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
In addition to what Kinu said, extended confirmed doesn't confer the ability to enable 2FA. You'll need to follow the instructions at H:ACCESS2FA. stwalkerster (talk) 17:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User:AsmarTiba

Hello, long time user of Wikipedia here, with a relatively new account which has less than 500 edits, while I was working on translating an article about an Israeli nurse and women's rights activist שרה לשנסקי (Sara Lishansky) from Hebrew to English. I noticed that I was only able to publish my translation as draft, What are my options in this case? AsmarTiba (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

P.S. I have previously done translation from English to Hebrew, I figured this limitation only applies when translating to English. AsmarTiba (talk) 11:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheSlumPanda

I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Your recent contributions to Talk:Sinsinwar and User_talk:Ratnahastin/Archive_3#h-Please_do_some_research_before_removing_anything.-20250118173800 don't inspire confidence in me about your understanding of our sourcing policies (and/or ability to maintain a neutral POV when editing WP:IPA topics). On that basis itself, I'm inclined to mark this as {{not done}}, however, I'll let other folks weigh in. Sohom (talk) 04:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done at this time, but if you enroll in WP:NPRSCHOOL I would be more than willing to give you this permission. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Just as a follow up NPPSCHOOL is not required for this permission. It's something I personally did and got a lot of benefit from. Dr vulpes (Talk) 10:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

User:S-Aura

Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly.

I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 07:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done at this time, but if you enroll in WP:NPRSCHOOL I would be more than willing to give you this permission. Dr vulpes (Talk) 07:54, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Sure! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 07:55, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
I have created over 50 articles across different categories, and I am an active user with 2000+ edit’s. Therefore, I would like to request the Trail New Page Reviewer rights. Thank you! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 08:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Barrettsprivateers

Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 18:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 20:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Owais Khursheed

Due to the inactivity the rights were revoked, would like to reinstate these rights. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 06:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done signed, Rosguill talk 20:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

User:GrabUp

Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 5 February 2025 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 07:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Rodney Baggins

I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

User:ViridianPenguin

I've been editing for over five years with 2.2K mainspace edits, which includes over 30 new articles. In May 2024, Clovermoss gave me a three-month trial of the NPP permission, and I got the reviewer barnstar in that month's backlog drive. I sparingly used AFD and CSD during my reviewing, but that is mostly because when I found deficient articles, I spent the time to make them passable, rather than sending them for draftification/deletion. When I did propose content for deletion, I generally received community consensus to do so. I am seeking the permission for permanent use, but another trial works too! ViridianPenguin 🐧 ( 💬 ) 18:29, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:History6042

I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you find yourself actually needing this, or are you just ticking the box because you meet the minimum requirements? Primefac (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use it so I could perform more moves as right now I can't do most of them without this permission. @Primefac History6042😊 (Contact me) 17:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done for now due to lack of need (zero edits to WP:RMTR and only one attempted and failed move). Please feel free to request moves there and if they get done by others consider rerequesting. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Tiggerjay

Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you find yourself actually needing this, or are you just ticking the box because you meet the minimum requirements? I note that you have an RM/TR request and a couple of G6's, but otherwise not much in the way of necessity so far. Primefac (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Currently I'm avoiding some NAC because I am not really a fan of using TR because what I've found is that the admin who does perform the TR ends up doing all of the busy work (post move cleanup). IMHO the closer should perform the dirty work of cleaning up the move, and I'm happy to do so. I would see myself closing more discussions if the bit was available. That is the reason for the low number of current TR/G6, but you can see the frequency I previously require those tools prior to a wikibreak over at my CSD log. For me the bit is not about hat collecting, but rather simply because I'm getting back involved in Wiki (due to life-schedule changes) and as a formerly trusted and well-reputed RM-NAC, these tools would make more closures with follow-on work accessible. TiggerJay (talk) 01:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:BryceM2001

I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 92 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 20:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not at this time due to limited editing experience but please do apply again later. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Ali Beary

I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)

@Ali Beary Given your recent WP:CUTPASTE move, I'd like to see a little more time for you to demonstrate your knowledge of Wikipedia policies and procedures before granting additional permissions. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:44, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
@Ahecht, ah, apologies. I didn't realize a "request moves" page existed, and I do not have move or merge permissions. I was simply undoing something that wasn't correct... hence why I requested move perms earlier so I could fix it. Ali Beary (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

User:TrueMoriarty

My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)

 Done If you run into any problems or have any questions please feel free to leave a message for me on my talk page. Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:41, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks.
TrueMoriarty (talk) 12:04, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Footballnerd2007

I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements.

Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting.

Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Not a good idea imo, editor has not yet demonstrated ability to distinguish vandalism from good faith constructive contributions. Sorry FN, but I did say I would oppose this as your mentor, and nothing has changed imo, so here I am. CNC (talk) 02:24, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Fishy-Finns

I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 19:50, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
 Done Yeah, that looks better. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:04, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User:CivilianArthur

Reason for requesting rollback rights I mainly spend my time on Wikipedia correcting non-constructive edits and vandalism, as well as notifying users. The majority of my edits are minor changes or changes to users' talk pages. I'm requesting rollback rights so that I can better use some of the anti-vandalism tools available to me. Thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

 Not done Not enough recent activity - your last 50 edits date back almost 2 years. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

User:Protobowladdict

I am requesting rollback rights because I spend most of my time on Wikipedia reverting vandalism, and I would like to help fight vandals more effectively. I have made some mistakes, but I mostly have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies, and I try to always WP:AGF. Rollback will also allow me to use tools like AntiVandal. Thank you. Protobowladdict (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Requests for template editor

Template editor

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Nux

Hi. I would like to request the rights to edit certain templates, such as the {{piechart}} template and its associated module, important when its usage increases. I want to have these rights in advance so I can apply fixes when needed.

I am already a sysop on pl-wiki and an interface admin on several wikis, including meta-wiki. See more on my page: User:Nux.

In real life, I am a library systems programmer with professional experience in WCAG and hold a certificate in web accessibility, which is useful for certain aspects of template development (colors, structure). I also work on gadgets and CI/CD scripts, such as Wikipedia:Wikiploy, which, while less relevant to templates, demonstrates my programming experience — an important skill for working with Lua modules.

Oh, I did read the guidelines. I even translated them into Polish; it didn't gain traction on plwiki, but at least now I know them :) Nux (talk) 20:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 951 total edits and has 56 edits in the template and module namespaces. — MusikBot talk 20:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
{{piechart}} is not protected so anyone can edit it. * Pppery * it has begun... 20:45, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
@Pppery When that template is used in an update to {{Pie chart}} (6927 transclusions) will it not automatically become template-protected? Rjjiii (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
It will. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:56, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

    .

    Template:Centralized discussion – Current discussions
    Expired PRODs (1)
    Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
    User requested 1
    Empty articles 0
    Nonsense pages 0
    Spam pages 7
    Importance or significance not asserted 0
    Other candidates 10
    RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
    RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

    No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

    Barnstars

    The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
    For adhereing to Wikipedia policies, professionalism, providing answers when needed, and for your help even though we do not agree on every detail. Thank you!
    Dr. Persi (talk) 05:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


    The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
    for consistently prompt action against miscreants. The Gnome (talk) 11:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
    The Barnstar of Diligence
    I award you this barnstar in recognition of a combination of extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service for Wikipedia's Caucasus related topics.--Yacatisma (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
    Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User:Doug_Weller&oldid=1260016081"