User talk:Another Believer
.jpg)
Welcome to the 2025 WikiCup!
[edit]Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2025 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.
For the 2025 WikiCup, we've implemented several changes to the scoring system. The highest-ranking contestants will now receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are now open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants will no longer be eliminated at the end of each round.
The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arden logo.jpeg
[edit]
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC) |
Seattle Wikipedia Day, January 11, 2025
[edit]Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
06:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.
|
2025 Update from Women in Green
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
 .jpg) Hello Another Believer: 2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved! For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you! This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around! You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
TFL notification
[edit]Hi, Another Believer. I'm just posting to let you know that Grammy Award for Best Hard Rock Performance – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 3. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:27, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Giants2008
Like Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:53, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of Wassertorplatz for deletion
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wassertorplatz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
Administrators' newsletter – January 2025
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2024).
|
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2025)
[edit]Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
ITN recognition for The Vivienne
[edit]
On 7 January 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article The Vivienne, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. TJMSmith (talk) 00:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
- Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:34, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Categories:LGBTQ in
[edit] ResolvedA category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Categories:LGBTQ in on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH talk! 23:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 66
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
 The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --17:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: December 2024
[edit]Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2025)
[edit]Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Deletion discussion about Dollya Black
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hello Another Believer, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Dollya Black, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dollya Black. Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) |
Deletion discussion about Evah Destruction
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hello Another Believer, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Evah Destruction, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evah Destruction. Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top. If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) |
- @MiitomoChris: Making you aware of this notification, since you expanded this redirect as well as Dollya Black (see immediately above). Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:38, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 January 2025
[edit]- From the editors: Looking back, looking forward
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2024
- In the media: Will you be targeted?
- Technology report: New Calculator template brings interactivity at last
- Opinion: Reflections one score hence
- Serendipity: What we've left behind, and where we want to go next
- Arbitration report: Analyzing commonalities of some contentious topics
- Humour: How to make friends on Wikipedia
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2025)
[edit]Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Bánh by Lauren logo.png
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 22 January 2025 (UTC) |
Portland meetup
[edit]@Another Believer Fyi, Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland/Social/January 2025 -- Best regards, -- Ooligan (talk) 06:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:34, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Maryana Iskander, the editor (or not)
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
AB, regarding your comment here. The conversation seems to have stopped a couple of years ago. Do you know if the Wikimedia CEO ever has registered as an editor on enwp? Cheers - ☆ Bri (talk) 18:42, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Category:WikiProject Rufus Wainwright participants has been nominated for discussion
[edit] ResolvedCategory:WikiProject Rufus Wainwright participants has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2025
[edit]Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Orphaned non-free image File:Rabbit Junk.jpeg
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2025)
[edit]Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2025 Issue 1
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
 Here is a quick overview of highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation since our last issue in December 2024. Please help translate.
Upcoming and current events and conversations 
Other Movement curated newsletters & news
Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. Let askcac |
Nomination of All Things Equal for deletion
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All Things Equal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
Category:Pit Crew has been nominated for deletion
[edit] ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Dude until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Flock (food hall) logo.png
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
 Thank you for uploading File:Flock (food hall) logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 19:11, 2 February 2025 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2025)
[edit]Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.jpg)
_logo.png){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
Nomination of Travel Portland for deletion
[edit]
UnresolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travel Portland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. |
- There are literally hundreds of sources in The Oregonian archives... ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:04, 3 February 2025 (UTC)
A goat for you!
[edit].jpg)
Thanks for starting the 2025 Day Without Immigrants article! Hope you're doing well. 
Missvain (talk) 02:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Like Thanks, you too! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:27, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2025
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2025). 
|
Links in Track Listing template
[edit]Hi! I saw you removed the links to Laura Nyro and Little Richard in the track list for Who Believes in Angels?. I was just curious if there's a Wikipedia standard/guideline about whether or not we should have links like that in track lists because I haven't really seen any consensus either way.
Hopefully this doesn't sound like sarcasm, I'm just asking this out of curiosity! I don't have any strong preference about whether or not they're included either way, but I did notice that The Diving Board does have the same thing going on there so I just wanted to see what the rule was so I know going forward.
Thanks for helping with the article by the way! Elephantranges (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm not sure if there's a specific guideline, but IMO contextual links like Laura Nyro and Little Richard belong in the article's prose, but not in the track listing template. Links in the track listing template suggest there are Wikipedia articles about those songs, which is misleading to readers. Are you able to incorporate those links in the article body so we are potentially confusing readers in the track listing section? Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:54, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Elephantranges: Sorry, forgot to ping! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
The Signpost: 7 February 2025
[edit]- Recent research: GPT-4 writes better edit summaries than human Wikipedians
- News and notes: Let's talk!
- Opinion: Fathoms Below, but over the moon
- Community view: 24th Wikipedia Day in New York City
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel articles 5 has closed
- Traffic report: A wild drive
Hello, Another Believer,
I de-PROD'd this article that was tagged based on two reasons, a) not all "attractions" were near to Portland and b) the article was unsourced. Since you have written so much on Oregon, do you know of appropriate sources for this article that you could help with? Thanks, in advance, and I hope you are having a good weekend. Liz Read! Talk! 23:19, 8 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Liz Thanks for the heads up. I'll see if I can get around it, but I am already putting in time working on a different tourism article that was AfD'd unnecessarily. Perhaps Tourist attractions near Portland, Oregon should be folded into Tourism in Portland, Oregon (?) Have a great weekend! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)