User talk:LeoFrank

Leave me a message

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12
Archive 13	Archive 14	Archive 15
Archive 16	Archive 17	Archive 18
Archive 19	Archive 20	Archive 21
Archive 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Common name

Have a look at this change to WP:COMMONNAME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the WP:COMMONNAME, but didn't remove the other name, which seem to show up in RS. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I somehow feel IATA's code search should be used for naming convention. — LeoFrank ^Talk 16:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it the official name? Have a look please. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:38, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another article [1]. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to cover up Controversies of Christ University

Please stop trying to cover up controversies of Christ University. The entire "Controversies" section has been removed with the reasoning of WP:NOTNEWS, which is not applicable in this context. This action appears as an attempt to obscure the historical and ongoing issues within the institution. It is crucial for the sake of transparency and accountability that all significant events, especially those that have impacted the university's reputation and stakeholder trust, are documented comprehensively and impartially. Therefore, I urge reconsideration of the removal and advocate for a balanced and well-cited section that accurately reflects the university's history, including its controversies. PotatoCyborg (talk) 14:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are so interested in including reactions of students, accused and write news-like content, please do so in your own news agency since you don't seem to understand how to write encyclopedic content. — LeoFrank ^Talk 15:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LeoFrank, let's clarify a crucial point: my interest is not in chronicling mere reactions but in reflecting significant developments that have been extensively covered by major news publications. These are not fleeting opinions but substantiated events that have shaped the narrative around Christ University. Every piece of information I've added aligns with Wikipedia's guidelines, emphasizing notability, verifiability, and neutrality.

Assuming that my contributions are akin to news-like content overlooks the fact that these are well-documented incidents with lasting implications for the university's history and reputation. Wikipedia thrives on presenting a comprehensive view, which includes detailing notable controversies when they are substantiated by reliable sources. My edits are not an exercise in sensationalism but a commitment to the encyclopedic documentation of the university's significant historical moments.

Therefore, I reiterate the necessity of including these well-covered and impactful controversies in the article, not as a news report, but as an encyclopedic record in line with Wikipedia’s standards. Dismissing these events underestimates their encyclopedic value and detracts from a complete and balanced portrayal of the institution. PotatoCyborg (talk) 15:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Central discussion invitation to Talk:Christ University

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Christ University § Concerns about Removal of Controversial Content from Christ University's Wikipedia Page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]