User:Mojoworker
|
.svg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
At some point I may actually add some narrative to my userpage.
Awards
[edit]| wise cleanup Thank you for quality articles on military history such as Battle of Pocotaligo, gnomish work on articles and fighting subtle vandalism, for illustrating "wise old thing" (with a ring to it), for working on cleanup in the tavern, - you are an awesome Wikipedian! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:50, 25 April 2014 (UTC) |
|
|
The Guidance Barnstar | |
| Dear Mojoworker, thanks for your kind words on my talk page, including your good faith and advice to make me a better Wikipedia editor. I wish the best to you and yours, AnupamTalk 16:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
The Civility Barnstar |
| yes Bondboy9756 (talk) 23:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Original Barnstar |
| thank you for turning the citations into same numbers, but how did you do that? Bondboy9756 (talk) 02:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Citation Barnstar |
| Thanks for actually showing me how to cite my sources! NumbnessOfDestruction (talk) 10:51, 18 June 2018 (UTC) |
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| Absolutely inspired :D ——SerialNumber54129 11:57, 18 April 2019 (UTC) |
Subpages
[edit]
No RfXs since 17:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online |
|
4.90 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 00:10, 30 January 2025 (UTC) change |
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Wafflerrs (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 36.13.89.230 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 00:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 184.98.220.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On 1408 (film) (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. InklingF (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 67SuperGirl67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Regular additions of unsourced material to BLPs, despite talk-page warnings. Seasider53 (talk) 23:58, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- 24.46.105.246 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Cassiopeia talk 00:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- 184.98.220.163 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) ip editor continuing to add unsourced content with final warnings, and after blocked has been lifted. Cassiopeia talk 00:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- PropagandaProtection (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "fake[- ]*news|disinformation|propaganda" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 23:10, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- Mohamedsalahbengalurufcsuperfan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Digitttttttttt (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Rahul SINGH Graphic Designers & Video Editor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- My553cornell.edu (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Top level domain" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Note on file Please check whether this name is promoting a Web site. Names may coincidentally resemble URLs or point to parked domains so take care. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Stinky75 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 21:50, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
- BruinsPleaseWin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "ruin" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 04:40, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Anderson1983Records (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Anchornoor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "Used rn instead of m attempting to skip filter: homo. Violating string: anchomoor" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Homo is Latin for "man" and Greek for "same". Please keep this in mind when evaluating a name. -- DQB (owner / report) 07:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Garydeangraytdcjnumber2071249 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- GlitchyNoob (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stinkychicken (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "stink(|s|ing|er|y)" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file the word "stinky" is not of itself sufficiently offensive to be blockable -- DQB (owner / report) 18:50, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ikewasbot11 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Frogspecial4694userspottercoat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- AutisticWoodcrawler (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "autism" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file Do be aware that some users who use this string may genuinely be autistic - please be careful and make sure you are dealing with a vandal/LTA first -- DQB (owner / report) 00:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Salaariseave (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. Appears to be using userpage as a webhost for links to promotional posts on other channels; Username is that of a well-lnown person. Geoff | Who, me? 16:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Fathoms Below (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Rethopsis (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See user:Rethopsis/sandbox. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:36, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Redfilmpro (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:CORPNAME, promotional userpage. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Semi-Protection: Persistent targeting by IP account listing Euromaidan revolution as a coup. Bird244 (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:09, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Multiple disruptive edits and ridiculous mass reverts from sockpuppets of a banned and locked user, who is ignorantly and angrily lashing out on people of quote-unquote "having bias towards VY Canis Majoris as the largest star" even despite my criticism and as well as List of largest stars still having stars with larger radii. Furthermore, this user has been cherry-picking unreliable and biased info like for NML Cygni and UY Scuti in particular such as old radii and status as the largest which likely just came from older Wikipedia revisions (and WP isn't a reliable reference). Just because a ref states a star as the largest star known doesn't mean it should be blindly considered as 100% as the largest depending on other sources and especially the reliable value estimate of the said star (see also an archived discussion). It can be said this sockpuppet creator may be just attempting to rudely force his takes on others rather than discuss in talk page in a civil way. Same goes for other pages this user recently edited like NML Cygni, Red supergiant, Talk:List of largest stars, Stephenson 2 DFK 1, Orders of magnitude (length), and List of star extremes. I apologize if my English was bad. Thanks. Regards—ZaperaWiki44(✉/Contribs) 19:59, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:13, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Anonymous accounts keep replacing the article with terms like "illegal alien" which is inaccurate and dehumanizing. Who the law affects is also under dispute in the talk page and I think it should be edit protected for the time being so we can reach a consensus on what terms to use. LaggyMcStab (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please enforce WP:CT/AP and invoke WP:CRP. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:24, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Requesting temporary semi-protection for two weeks, i.e. a few days after Chinese New Year ends. Annual uptick in unsourced and vandal edits due to the festival starting, including racist vandalism. Don't need another year of admins having to revert and hide a dozen revisions. Yue🌙 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated addition of uncited birthdate (BLP issue). May need full protection since it's both IPs and logged-in editors. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seems Semi was circumvented. IanDBeacon (talk) 22:27, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High profile page with many IP edits making changes without edit summaries and disregarding Wikipedia policy. Gjb0zWxOb (talk) 22:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. The last IP edit was over a week ago. Dr vulpes (Talk) 23:01, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 23:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: The main article is currently semi-protected due to vast numbers of IP editors editing it to comment on the BLP subject's sexuality, or their perception of his sexuality. They've now transitioned to just editing the Talk page with that, with six such incidences of vandalism in the last three weeks (the Talk page is otherwise dead). Chetsford (talk) 23:49, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Seems semi was circumvented here as well. IanDBeacon (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: People don't need to be editing this page. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 00:27, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent, on-going addition of unsourced information. livelikemusic (TALK!) 00:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Recurring vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 2 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:00, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 2 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 22:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
The editor has written 176 articles, with only two being deleted. Their work is well-researched, notable, and meets the encyclopedic standards. Given their track record, I believe they can be trusted to patrol their own articles. Garuda Talk! 13:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
I am requesting AWB rights to assist with repetitive and time-consuming tasks like correcting formatting issues, standardising citation styles, updating outdated links, and organising categories. My goal: improve the quality and consistency of Wikipedia articles with an interest in contributing to medicine/biology. waddie96 ★ (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed[edit] |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Dear Wikipedia Administrators, I am writing to request the necessary permissions to enable two-factor authentication (2FA) on my Wikipedia account. I value the security of my account and believe that adding 2FA will provide an additional layer of protection, ensuring the safety of my contributions and the integrity of my account. My Contributions: Username: Jjackson10003 Account Details: Autoconfirmed user since August 10, 2020, with 10 edits to date. I have actively contributed to Wikipedia by [briefly describe your contributions, such as editing specific articles, creating pages, or participating in discussions]. Reason for Request: As technology evolves, the risk of account hijacking increases, particularly with the rise of AI and changes in regimes that may encourage bad actors to exploit vulnerabilities. Enabling 2FA will significantly reduce the likelihood of unauthorized access to my account and prevent potential misuse. Ensuring account security is critical, both for individual users and for the protection of Wikipedia’s broader community and platform integrity. While I am currently an autoconfirmed user, I understand that 2FA is typically reserved for users with advanced permissions. I kindly request that I be considered for either extended confirmed user status or temporary access to enable 2FA. Commitment to Wikipedia Standards: I am committed to following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, ensuring that my contributions adhere to community standards. I believe that my request aligns with the shared goal of maintaining a secure and trustworthy environment for editors and the broader Wikipedia community. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if there is any additional information or clarification needed. I am happy to provide further details about my contributions or intentions. Sincerely, Jjackson10003 Jjackson10003 (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, long time user of Wikipedia here, with a relatively new account which has less than 500 edits, while I was working on translating an article about an Israeli nurse and women's rights activist שרה לשנסקי (Sara Lishansky) from Hebrew to English. I noticed that I was only able to publish my translation as draft, What are my options in this case? AsmarTiba (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly. I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles. Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello I am interested in contributing more to wikipedia. I've been editing pages for about 8 years. I can edit in Croatian and Ukrainian as well. Barrettsprivateers (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)
Due to the inactivity the rights were revoked, would like to reinstate these rights. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 06:00, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting to extend my NPP flag. I enjoyed reviewing redirects and articles. Thanks GrabUp - Talk 07:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been Wiki-editing since 2018 and have become a familiar face on the snooker project. I'm accustomed to creating articles and redirects, and I'm fully conversant with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I've co-nominated three articles for FAC (all promoted) and contributed to many other FACs. I've been a pending changes reviewer since May 2020, and I like to think I am fair and neutral in any discussions that I get involved in. With over 24,000 main space edits to my name, I've been quite an active editor over the years, and I think I could make a useful contribution as a New page reviewer. Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I think I meet all the criteria, I have been an editor for more than 6 months, I have over 3000 edits, I have participated in more than 50 move requests, and I've never been blocked. History6042😊 (Contact me) 21:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Recently active back at RM for the past three months after being extremely active many years ago. I was brought to MR twice in 2013 & 2015 and in both cases my closure was endorsed. I have !voted recently in most of the recent months of MR and always aligned with consensus. Spent the last three months getting reacquainted with the changes in policy and approaches to RM's and have started to perform some closures. Would appreciate the bit to help reduce the need for CSD#G6 and/or RM/TR to complete some of these moves. Thanks! TiggerJay (talk) 08:47, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I am re-requesting rollback after being denied around the end of December for not being consistent enough in RC patrol to meet the criteria. I understand that now and have come back with hopefully having reverted obvious and blatant vandalism more consistently over the past month. As always, I assume good faith, and when it comes to recent changes, if I see something that I'm not quite sure is vandalism or not, I won't undo it. I am well-versed in the different warning templates and when to use each one, and I know when it is appropriate to report to WP:AIV. Rollback will help me quickly undo the very obvious and problematic vandalism that I might catch on RC. Fishy-Finns (talk) 19:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights I mainly spend my time on Wikipedia correcting non-constructive edits and vandalism, as well as notifying users. The majority of my edits are minor changes or changes to users' talk pages. I'm requesting rollback rights so that I can better use some of the anti-vandalism tools available to me. Thanks for your time. CivilianArthur (talk) 20:44, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Hi. I would like to request the rights to edit certain templates, such as the {{piechart}} template and its associated module, important when its usage increases. I want to have these rights in advance so I can apply fixes when needed. I am already a sysop on pl-wiki and an interface admin on several wikis, including meta-wiki. See more on my page: User:Nux. In real life, I am a library systems programmer with professional experience in WCAG and hold a certificate in web accessibility, which is useful for certain aspects of template development (colors, structure). I also work on gadgets and CI/CD scripts, such as Wikipedia:Wikiploy, which, while less relevant to templates, demonstrates my programming experience — an important skill for working with Lua modules. Oh, I did read the guidelines. I even translated them into Polish; it didn't gain traction on plwiki, but at least now I know them :) Nux (talk) 20:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
|