Jump to content

Talk:List of Modern Family characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality of this Article

[edit]

Words used in this article do not represent a neutral point of view on some characters and any citations do not display these views either.

Improvement to the article

[edit]

I think some of the issues with the article are now resolved. Are all three of the issues listed still present in the article? If so can they maybe be described in more detail so they can be addressed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikopowii (talk • contribs) 21:19, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Last Name Verification

[edit]

I've added [citation needed] to all the family last names. Most of the cited last names have never been mentioned on the show. Lily has never been called 'Lily Pritchett-Tucker', for example, and Jay's family has never been called the 'Pritchett-Delgado' family. Normally this wouldn't matter, but considering that two of these families don't have any traditional naming styles, these assumptions can't be made. Also, they're a little sexist and unequal, when they're compared to each other. Claire, according to the article, took her husband's name, and her family is called the 'Dunphies'. But Cam and Mitchell have kept their names and are called the 'Pritchett and Tucker' family.theBOBbobato (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tags Please don't put tags in headings. Use them inline or {{Section-unsourced}}. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:22, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the last name issue, I'm ok with the last name assumptions as long as there is no evidence in the show or bio's to contradict. That said, in Season 2, episode 17, aired on March 2, 2011, "Two Monkeys and a Panda,"[1] There were at least 2 scenes with Mitchell and Cam regarding Lily's last name. Mitchell did the legal paperwork (he is a lawyer) that gave her the name Lily Tucker Pritchett, no hyphen. After the argument Mitchell did promise to get her name "fixed" and thus hyphenate it. Was it ever done? I don't know...Kosherdill1 (talk) 02:07, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Season 2, episode 17, aired on March 2, 2011, "Two Monkeys and a Panda,"

'Province of' Quebec

[edit]

In Dede Pritchett's article, it is said that she lives in 'The Province' of Quebec. This is not necessary, since the city of Quebec is never simply called 'Quebec', but 'Quebec City'. While, in French, the city is sometimes called only Québec, this custom doesn't apply to English because this is the English Wikipedia, and Quebec isn't even written as it is in French, with an accent. Normally this wouldn't matter at all, but someone obviously cares about this triviality and is reverting edits to the line. Please, use the discussion page.theBOBbobato (talk) 20:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Miura section

[edit]

I believe the episode where Lily says "mommy" expresses that she learned the word from the doll and not that they mistook the dolls words for Lily's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.215.225.162 (talk) 18:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stella

[edit]

Please stop adding Stella to the article. A pet is not a supporting character. If this pet had a developed personality or voiceover like List of Married... with Children characters#Buck, it would be fine to include. Sottolacqua (talk) 16:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

True but Stella is a big part to modern family jay always choose Stella first before his kid before his wife so it may be exceptibel. Kat greeso (talk) 22:19, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Javier is absolutely not wealthy.

[edit]

I have no idea where whoever wrote this article got the impression that Javier is wealthy, but it is never alluded to, and, in fact, there are numerous cases where it is suggested that he is poor (for example, Gloria is talking about Javier as being unafraid of anything in the Season One episode "fear," and Jay says "but go to dinner with him and wait for the check to come. Then you'll see fear in his eyes. Like the waiter's a ghost"). I removed this accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.219.39.47 (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Al Bundy Character Description

[edit]

Someone has replaced huge swathes of character description with copied/pasted descriptions of Al Bundy from Married with Children. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.218.78 (talk) 04:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ronnie and Amber

[edit]

I think we should add more info on the LaFontaines since they appeared in about 4 episodes this season. — Confession0791 talk 07:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of Modern Family characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:33, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Modern Family characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Character infoboxes

[edit]

Are character infoboxes necessary? If so, why do we need a bunch of relatives' names in every infobox? One of previous revisions contained less names than the current revision does. Also, it used free images before IP users replaced them with non-free images, which are currently tagged with {{di-disputed fair use rationale}} (which I will discuss at another venue). Also, the infoboxes affect the space of this page, thus not allowing enough room for free images of the individual cast members. George Ho (talk) 08:36, 22 December 2017 (UTC); updated (see below), 05:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reinserted the free images. Still, the long list of relatives affect the spacing between sections, so {{clear}} is used in every section (though I didn't add them). George Ho (talk) 05:07, 26 December 2017 (UTC); edited, 05:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: I think it's time for the infoboxes to either be severely trimmed or removed altogether. Content keeps being added to their relative sections by various IPs that 81) might not be true or verifiable, and (2) is more trivia/fancruft than encyclopedic content. If infoboxes are needed than perhaps only the most eseential parameters should be kept and everything else dumped. It might be a good idea to post a {{Please see}} about this on WT:TV to get feedback from more editors. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I already did one month ago, Marchjuly. Seems that there's not much input from them (yet). George Ho (talk) 02:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't know you'd already posted there. Maybe then we should just be bold and remove/trim as deemed appropriate, and then leave a link to this discussion in the edit sum. I could see removing the relative information at the very least and leaving the other stuff, but I could also see agree to removing the entire infobox as well. Any preference? -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I was bold on removing infoboxes about fictional pets. Unsure about what to do with infoboxes about youngest characters, like Joe Pritchett and Lily. I thought about removing the names of most relatives as they are not very relevant to those characters, but I'd like second opinions. Alternatively, how do we properly collapse the names of relatives? I tried using {{collapsed infobox section begin}}, but the templates affected the cell margins of the "Relatives" portion. George Ho (talk) 03:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
All of the info about fictional relatives is sort of like a Help:Family trees for a fictional character; personally, it all seems superfluous to me and more likely something you'd find on a fan page than an in encyclopedic article. If these characters had their own stand-alone articles, then it might make sense to include some of that info, but it seems excessive for a list article. I watch the show and understand that part of its appeal is all the intertwinning branches of all of families, but the relative section for the infoboxes is starting to get a bit ridiculous. If the infoboxes are going to be kept, then, in my opinion, (1) the photos should be moved there and (2) all of the "information" parameters should be removed. Look at some of the articles in WP:FL#Cast members; none of them seem to contain even a third of the fancruft that this one does. I realize the FA is a pretty high standard, but such articles can be useful as a guide in cases like this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even when I haven't watched the show, I used my sense and removed names from some infoboxes as irrelevant to individual characters. George Ho (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on List of Modern Family characters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 23:44, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Rexford Tucker-Pritchett

[edit]

The last episodes have the Tucker-Pritchetts adopting a baby boy, whom they name Rexford(Rex), for the street their house is on.

You may have heard that Mitch and cam are making a travelling show though Rexford may not be there real baby he might be in it Kat greeso (talk) 22:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Modern_Family_characters&oldid=1212517887"