Jump to content

User:Pratyya Ghosh/Dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 1
Requests for unblock 109
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 64
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 76
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 14
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 188
Requested RD1 redactions 10
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 16
Open sockpuppet investigations 269
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

[edit]


Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 1
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 1
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Possibly contested candidates 4
Other candidates 14
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 10 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

[edit]
  • Damudcock (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Jdcomix (talk) 00:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
    @Jdcomix: Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously. jlwoodwa (talk) 03:58, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
    Being discussed with the user. 50/50 on the name, and their only edit to date is in good faith. Let's await response to the userpage message. Euryalus (talk) 07:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Lizliz20242024 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Aydoh8[contribs] 05:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
    Aydoh8, which edits show promotional editing for something with this name? Cullen328 (talk) 06:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
    Page has been deleted, so I can't get the diffs. Aydoh8[contribs] 06:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Deleted edits are a cut and paste from an academic study and don't relate to this username. -- Euryalus (talk) 06:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
    Aydoh8 A "promotional username" usually means a username that is that of a cause or business, like "OfficialWalmartAccount" or just "Walmart" or "KamalaforPresident2024". The account also(unless blatantly obvious) should have made edits related to whatever it is they are promoting. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Mydeardesign (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spamming mydeardesign.com. Belbury (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
    Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:02, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Aryan2121 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive username. Jdcomix (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: Persistent edits misrepresenting facts about the results of a lawsuit filed against Weber which were each either dismissed or settled with no admission or finding of guilt.

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – IPs updating the article earlier than they're supposed to; a few days/a week would be preferable. 4TheWynne (talk contribs) 02:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

"Earlier than they're supposed to"? Do we have a rule that says this? Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Constant IP vandalism/changes to team players - anonymous IPs maliciously changing information every other day. The changes are malicious, as it is clearly written that the 'nationality' should be which country they are, can or have represented. Players are also being removed even when they are listed as being part of the first team on the official team website. Yupyuphello (talk) 04:38, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Qaqaamba (talk) 08:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary protection: Persistant vandalism, from history I believe there is a contoversy. Pending changes protection might be enough Lordseriouspig 09:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Endless IPs adding a non-existant film - has had to be protected 7 times in the past - Arjayay (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – There's an ongoing dispute mostly between IPs regarding content related to Dolgopyat's reaction to the October 2023 attack which I think falls under WP:ARBECR. S0091 (talk) 14:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continuous disruption caused by IP editors and new accounts over the last week or two. — kashmīrī TALK 14:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Please enfoce WP:CT/IPA. IanDBeacon (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Admin action needed for that. — kashmīrī TALK 15:47, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Will log at CTOPS. Daniel Case (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent addition of unsourced information to BLP following press speculation. Egghead06 (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Jdcomix (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite extended protection: Persistent Vandalism. Vandalism keeps happening to this article 1keyhole (talk) 15:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Note: There's no need for indefinite, or ECP, but I would like to see a further period of semi-protection here. I protected the page last time, and I'm looking at getting involved, so I'm passing this to someone else. Some IP edits are OK, but there's various BLP issues, and the right-wing POV-pushers are increasingly turning up. Thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive anon editing [1]. Also sockfarm target [2]. Article is under WP:GS/PAGEANTS. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 17:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from 3 different IPs asserting his parents are siblings signed, Willondon (talk) 17:24, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – IPs continue adding unsourced shows and NOTTVGUIDE information despite the reverts and warnings. CNMall41 (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent edit warring/nearing vandalism. Multiple editors are attempting to force a POV phrase into the article and it has had to be corrected over and over. I don't know if it matters, but the disruptive editors are either anonymous or under a hundred total edits. They have been told not to do so in many edit summaries and refuse to listen. The page had to be protected two months ago due to constant vandalism and I think it needs it again. TanRabbitry (talk) 18:23, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: IP vandalism. Block-evading IPs adding disruptive content. ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:44, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Cyberbot has archived the original request, so re-requesting. @Daniel Case: thanks for the blocks, but it looks like a wider rangeblock will be be needed, or simply semiprotection of the article: please see SPI. Wikishovel (talk) 19:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Other admins made those blocks. I will look into the ranges we might want to block. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2409:40F3:0:0:0:0:0:0/42 (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. from the article for two weeks. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 19:11, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: A vandal sockpuppet user User: NairaMahiHDPaakhiAadhya was recently banned for adding fanfics by removing sourced information from the listed articles (few other also). Following this, same kind of disruptive edits were made by different IPs, presumably by the same sockpuppet master User: Kairakairav. .245CMR.👥📜 19:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced claims that the duo disbanded following a recent controversy mostly by ip addresses or recently created accounts. I would recommend at least a few months of semi-protection. Thank you. Example of disruptive diffs: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. Yvan Part (talk) 19:50, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – ip vandalism, he has switched from Argentina to Germany apparently. Knitsey (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: A genuine page was deleted.

Manoj Kumar Goswami is a unique personality, an author, journalist, who was awarded Sahitya Academy Award in 2022. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_Sahitya_Akademi_Award_winners_for_Assamese#Recipients

Please help restore the page or remove blockade to create a new one. Thanks. Babulgogoi (talk) 05:48, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

@Babulgogoi: I heavily doubt, given your request above, that you should be the one to write that page. Also, you will need to contest the deletion at WP:DRV as it was deleted via Articles for Deletion debate. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Declined. Wrong venue. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:21, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Also see Manoj Kumar (moved 2021) Zinnober9 (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

5 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Protected page text (request) 2024-07-24 18:26 Fully protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-01-01: "used in MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext and MediaWiki:Cascadeprotected"
Template:Wikipedia languages/core (request) 2024-07-27 11:23 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Template:Wikipedia languages (request) 2024-07-30 19:50 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
User:XLinkBot/RevertList header (request) 2024-08-01 18:09 Fully protected (log) Protected by Beetstra on 2008-02-08: "high-risk page"
Bursuuk (request) 2024-08-04 19:32 Fully protected, expires 2024-08-05 at 18:03:14 UTC (log) Protected by CambridgeBayWeather on 2024-07-29: "Edit warring / content dispute; requested at WP:RfPP"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 19:35, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
15 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox Chinese (request) 2024-06-07 08:07 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-06-20 06:11 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-06-20 07:17 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Infobox Christian leader (request) 2024-06-28 12:36 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-06-30 06:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Infobox islands/length (request) 2024-07-10 14:57 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. An increase of edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:Sports color/baseball (request) 2024-07-10 18:29 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikBot II on 2021-08-17: "High-risk template or module 30997 transclusions (more info)"
Template:Contentious topics/talk notice (request) 2024-07-15 08:15 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-16: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox person (request) 2024-07-19 00:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Module:Navbox (request) 2024-07-19 19:53 Template-protected (log) Modified by Ged UK on 2014-05-07: "lowering to template protection"
Template:Infobox road (request) 2024-07-26 06:18 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-18: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:User sandbox (request) 2024-07-28 15:51 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mike V on 2014-02-17: "enabling template protection"
Template:Infobox islands (request) 2024-07-30 17:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Yaris678 on 2017-03-13: "For consistency with Template:Infobox islands. No change to edit protection and decrease of move protection."
Module:Icon/data (request) 2024-08-01 03:01 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2015-01-23: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:College color/data (request) 2024-08-04 15:30 Template-protected (log) Modified by Galobtter on 2019-01-24: "High-risk Lua module"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for accountcreator

Account creator

[edit]

I'm requesting Account creator to help people gain access to Wikipedia accounts. Cisaa11 (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done – not a member of the ACC team — JJMC89(T·C) 05:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

[edit]

Has created roughly 30 articles by my count; only one stub, my spotchecks found nothing concerning. Diverging Diamond (is Queen of Hearts's alt; talk) 19:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Is there any indication that the user wants autopatrolled? I don't want to throw rights at someone who would prefer that their creations be reviewed by NPP/AfC. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 10:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@Red-tailed hawk: Unlike other PERMs, third party nominations for autopatrolled are welcome (preferred even), because it's primarily a tool used by NPP to manage its workload rather than a tool used by the holder to edit. If someone really doesn't want it for some reason, they can of course ask for it to be removed. – Joe (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
@Red-tailed hawk I would be open to having it. Hypothetically I like the idea of someone else checking my articles or critiquing them, but no one who has patrolled my articles has ever really made a significant change or tagged anything, so it hasn't really helped there lol, so if it reduces the NPP workload and gets the page indexed faster I don't see why not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 13:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
In that case, I have no objection to granting the right. — Red-tailed sock (Red-tailed hawk's nest) 13:08, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 00:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

For a third time, I'm applying for autopatrolled rights; my first request was denied in April 2023, and my second request was denied in June 2024. The reason for the first decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability." After that decline, I worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I added a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). The reason for the second decline was that I moved one of my BLP articles back into the mainspace without changing the sourcing, and it was eventually deleted (that was a mistake on my part). Now, roughly two months later, I have had little to no problems with the other articles I have brought over. I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around, as I believe it will help lighten the NPP workload to some extent. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 20:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([3]). MusikBot talk 20:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


Requesting so I can help streamline small edits like typos, general maintenance, and so on. NyanThousand (talk) 12:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

I will use AWB to tag galaxy-related (and other astronomical objects) with the appropriate talk page banners (WP:ASTRONOMICAL OBJECTS), and will use it to tag "Weather of _____" with the corresponding task force talk page banner tags. I can also use it for typos on long tornado articles, which tend to have misspellings in them. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 05:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

Hoping it will make nitpicky edit somewhat less tedious. Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 18:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

[edit]
Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

[edit]

I probably will not be extended confirmed because I have made few edits. etaoin shrdlu(cmfwyp|vbgkqj) 14:28, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. This will be granted automatically when you meet the requirements listed above. stwalkerster (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
But it has been more than 30 days! etaoin shrdlu(cmfwyp|vbgkqj) 21:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
You need to meet both the 30 day requirement and the 500 edits requirement. At the moment, you've only made 73 edits. stwalkerster (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I thought it was 30 edits within 500 days! etaoin shrdlu(cmfwyp|vbgkqj) 13:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

I ask permission to translate from English to Italian and viceversa without waiting for the 30 days and 500 edits limits... I would like to add more information about my family and my ancestors (Barattucci, in Wikipedia I found only Antonio: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Barattucci) but I don't think I will reach 500 edits during this process.. and I'd like to translate the pages into English too. Also, I'd like to translate into Italian the page of the Adragna family (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Adragna_family), one of its member is my friend Marta Adragna and she asked me to create the Italian version. Thanks in advance, Fabio Barattucci. DucaTux (talk) 22:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)

@DucaTux: I'm somewhat sympathetic to this request, but could you try to write some pages here first? If you write some articles on English Wikipedia (or even better, manually translate some articles to the site) that meet our content standards, and you promise to not edit in any contentious topics areas before you have had an account for 30 days with 500 edits, I'd grant this permission.
I'll note that for example, it:Antonio Barattucci is somewhat below our standards as there aren't any inline references (we would also usually want more than one reliable source to demonstrate notability. Also it's discouraged to write articles about people you're closely related to, as you might have a conflict of interest... but obviously it's fine for historical figures from hundreds of years ago.
Finally, we can't grant you any permissions here at Italian Wikipedia, which you'd need to translate to Italian. You'll have to request those there.
Please let me know if you have any questions. Gonna mark this as  Not done for now in the meantime. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

My previous account was User:Toobigtokale, I had it closed per WP:RTV but decided to make a new account per WP:CLEANSTART as per the instructions on RTV. On my previous account I was extended confirmed and also had access to WP:AutoWikiBrowser. My account was consistently in good standing, had around 77,000 edits on it. Samples of my past work: 1883 Korean special mission to the United States, Utoro, Uji

I'd like to get access to EC status early so I can edit some locked Korea-related pages, namely Seoul and the Korean War. seefooddiet (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

[edit]

I want to reduce the massive backlog. I have been looking at the new pages patrol feed sporadically for the past two months and the backlog keeps increasing. I want to play a part in reviewing the articles. HRShami (talk) 11:19, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello there, I am interested tn helping out in new page reviewing as there are very large articles backlog and love to do so. Xegma(talk) 07:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Question, though I am not an administrator, I see that you have published accepted AFC submissions, even if they lack citations or are in need of some fixing. And some have orange banners on them. Why is this? — 48JCL 01:01, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
@48JCL: As they should. The standard at acceptance at AfC is that the article would probably survive an AfD. Nothing more. Declining a draft for surmountable problems like a lack of citations or pretty much anything covered by a cleanup banner is inappropriate. – Joe (talk) 08:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I spot checked the 4 most recent accepts and they had lots of citations at time of acceptance. Feel free to link to the specific draft accepts you are concerned with. A complete lack of citations is a valid draftification reason and valid AFC decline reason, but I am not seeing that here. A major lack of citations such as entire paragraphs missing a citation (and also not supported by any WP:GENREFs) could be a valid decline reason (WP:V is policy after all). But it may also be reasonable to accept a draft that is mostly cited and just missing a couple citations, such as Draft:Norah Fulcher. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:33, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request new page reviewer rights to help review newly-created articles and lower the backlog. I have accepted lots of drafts at AFC and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to exhibit my knowledge of notability, as I was advised previously. Thanks! Waqar💬 19:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 20:00, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I see you found the IP at AfC who submits soundtrack articles (41 accepts of soundtracks it looks like). I'm glad to see you've started to accept drafts at AfC, instead of just declining (a ratio of 1 accepted to 348 declined at the time of the last application). I do still have concerns about your experience at AFD, given that, of your last 40 votes, all but 2 of them were pile on votes where the result had basically already been decided based on the number of votes for the conclusion you chose. You accepted one piece of criticism from me, your lack of accepts at AfC, but you do still appear to be pile on voting. Honestly, I'm not sold, but I'll leave it up to someone else whether they want to grant you a trial or not. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your feedback. I understand your points, I've made lots of contributions recently, and I hope I will be granted a trial to demonstrate my willingness to contribute positively. Best, Waqar💬 07:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to say that I've been working so hard for the past couple of months. I've made so many contributions to AFCs, I've reviewed over 1,160 articles (accepts: 138, declines: 670, and the rest either rejected or speedily deleted) so far. I'm also actively patrolling the new page feed, adding maintenance tags, and tagging articles for speedy deletion like A3, A7, and G11. I've drafted more than 200 articles that either lacked reliable sources or needed additional sources. In the AFD discussions, I voted on more than 150 pages. Without considering the no consensus results, 98.6% of my AfD's were matches, and even though the votes were assumed to be piles on voting, most of my recent votes were very detailed and specific and weren't pointing towards anyone, but I will accept their valuable advice and try my best to make improvements at AFDs as well. Having said that, I believe that all those contributions exhibit my hard work and dedication. I hope I get a chance to at least prove myself by patrolling new pages, and I would be more than happy to help with the backlog. Thanks for your time and consideration. Waqar💬 18:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

I was given a trial for a few months and would like to renew my permissions. I have made good use of my permissions by fixing new pages and applying CSD whenever necessary. Florificapis (talk) 22:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Joe Roe (expires 00:00, 6 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 22:50, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

I'd like to help out with the backlog at NPP. My previous experience includes many nominations of drafts under G1, G2, and G3, and a couple instances of article ratings and XfD participation. Rusty 🐈 03:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm interested in becoming a new page reviewer to help spread knowledge on wikipedia. Cisaa11 (talk) 05:06, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 48 days and has 0 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 05:10, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
 Not done per above — JJMC89(T·C) 05:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page mover

Page mover

[edit]


I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Reason for requesting page mover rights: I want to have my page mover rights extended, as I contribute to RM/TR. Was given 3mo trial and it will end on August 20. ToadetteEdit! 08:30, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary page mover rights by Robertsky (expires 00:00, 20 August 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 08:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

I was granted pagemover rights nearly a month back, but due to mistakes on my part, the rights have been now revoked. So, I am requesting the rights again on Primefac's advice, explaining why I made the mistakes and how I shall avoid those mistakes going forward.

  • On 30 July, I moved British Indian Army to Indian Army (1895–1947) after which Celia Homeford informed me that the move had been unilateral, following which I immediately proceeded to check the talk page of the article for previous RMs, which I did find and had resulted in the move of Indian Army (1895–1947) to British Indian Army. I hadn't checked the talk page before swapping the page and thus had not been aware of this RM when I had swapped — a mistake on my part. I had checked the WP:COMMONNAME of the article and sought to make the article title WP:Consistent with other historical army related articles like German Army (1935–1945) for instance. I should've checked the talk page and it's archives for any previous RMs and discussions before making the swap. That is what I usually do before making a move or a swap, but this step had slipped my mind in this case. In future, I shall make sure to always check the talk page and the archives for RMs and discussions regarding the article title without fail before making a move or a swap.

I've learnt from my mistakes and hope not to repeat them. I also aim to minimise any chance of any other mistakes on my part. PadFoot (talk) 17:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). MusikBot talk 18:00, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I've been doing patrolling for a little while now, and recently started seriously devoting time. I believe I will submit myself in patrolling recent changes in contributing to anti-vandalism work. Thanks Fsrvb (talk) 19:43, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had an account for 6 days and has 28 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 00:00, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
I have been monitoring recent changes on pages for a while now AlexBobCharles (talk) 08:36, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

[edit]

I've been patrolling recent changes for a while now, using Twinkle to warn members. I have over 200 mainspace edits, and I'm extended confirmed with over 700 edits total. I've also been doing NPP for a little too. I'd like to use rollback for more advanced tools such as Huggle and AntiVandal. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 06:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 10:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t believe I'm not, @Fastily:, I warn people using twinkle, here is my warn logs: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Lordseriouspig&namespace=3&tagfilter=twinkle&start=&end=&limit=50. Lordseriouspig 20:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
I reviewed your contributions from last month and found these within seconds: 1, 2, 3. I'll repeat what I said above: it's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
I’m unsure why I forgot to add a warning for those, @Fastily, considering Twinkle automatically opens the talk page, but I usually warn members, and tools like Anti-vandal or Huggle would probable negate me forgetting warns. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 10:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
No worries, thanks for your honesty. Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 23:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
No problem, @Fastily I’ll definitely try to leave warnings for every revert I make. Thanks, Lordseriouspig 02:57, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for confirming  Done -Fastily 11:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

I've been viewing recent changes for a while with Twinkle, and would like to keep using the Android app to prevent vandalism, which requires rollback permissions.

I am aware, after reading others' requests, that warning users after edits must be done every single time. While there are moments in which I have forgot to do this in the past, I will ensure to make it a consistency going forward. LR.127 (talk) 00:54, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks for confirming. Could you please now go some RC patrol in which you demonstrate how you will be notifying all users? -Fastily 11:10, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

[edit]
    New page patrol

    4 August 2024