User talk:Oct13

Ways to improve Predestination in Catholicism

Hello, Oct13,

Thank you for creating Predestination in Catholicism.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Citing the Catechism does not give notability to this teaching. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Assent of faith" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Assent of faith and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 13#Assent of faith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Full assent of faith" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Full assent of faith and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 13#Full assent of faith until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 21:10, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Criticism of the Quran

added a link pointing to Shirk

Jahannam

added a link pointing to Shirk

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Criticism of the Quran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Autobiography of Anthony Mary Claret for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autobiography of Anthony Mary Claret is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autobiography of Anthony Mary Claret until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pbritti (talk) 15:17, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello, I'm Iskandar323. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Criticism of Muhammad, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Suffice to say, religious websites should not be your go-to for reliable information. Primary religious texts can also not be used as standalone sources - they need to be backed by secondary analysis. Iskandar323 (talk) 08:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mortal Sins According To The Catholic Church

Template:Mortal Sins According To The Catholic Church has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Elizium23 (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abomination (Judaism) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abomination (Judaism) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abomination (Judaism) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pbritti (talk) 23:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Queen of Heaven, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Catholic hamartiology, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eighth Commandment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original holiness moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Original holiness, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:40, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fallacies of atheism moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fallacies of atheism, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Completed revelation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Completed revelation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Completed revelation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Veverve (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infallible declarations

Template:Infallible declarations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Veverve (talk) 23:19, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religious responses to the problem of evil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eternal life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Original holiness

Hello, Oct13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Original holiness, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fallacies of atheism

Hello, Oct13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fallacies of atheism, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fallacies of atheism

Hello, Oct13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fallacies of atheism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Persecution of Christians by Christians for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persecution of Christians by Christians is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persecution of Christians by Christians until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tomorrow and tomorrow (talk) 01:10, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eternal life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heaven in Christianity, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Eternal life and Saint Faustina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm Pbritti. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that many of the sources that you have recently utilized are primary sources, which are not preferred. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:45, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beatific vision, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Apparition and Locution.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New Earth (Christianity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eternal life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hell in Christianity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benedictus Deus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Pbritti. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. While you sometimes furnish sources for content, the sources are often primary-source documents which you are interpreting (see WP:PRIMARY and WP:NOR for additional guidance) ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:29, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of Religion -> Catholocism

This edit of yours, changing the woird "tradsition" to "art" caught my eye. That seemed a pretty significant change, so I checked the cited supporting source. In there, I did not find support there for either "tradition" or "art". With respect to that supporting source, this strikes me either way as WP:OR. I found seveeral similar examples in that section -- it looks to me as if the content in this example and in other parts of that section are more interpreting the sources cited than paraphrasing them -- and unsupported interpretation in WP:WIKIVOICE is OR. I just came across this in passing and, though it seems to me that {{fv}} and {{or}} tags are called for, I have not tagged either this assertion or the other ones I saw as problematic -- I simply don't want to get drawn into a discussion about religion. I take it from other comments on this talk page that you may be motivated to look into this and to make edits needed to improve it, so please consider this a heads-up from an editor without much topical expertise. It could be that other supporting sources more directly on point regarding some assertions in this section need to be added instead of or in addition to the currently cited sources. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freedom of religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native Americans.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns

Hello Oct13. An editor has some concerns over the addition of this "mortal sin" template you're adding to articles. Please see Wikipedia:Teahouse#User created "mortal sin in Catholic Church" template and added it to dozens of articles. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 06:17, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mortal sin in the Catholic Church

Template:Mortal sin in the Catholic Church has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Moxy🍁 07:08, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. You've been adding a template to dozens of articles. Most of these edits don't make sense. You're not being helpful. Other editors have to clean up the mess you created. — Chrisahn (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Homosexuality. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Nixovel (talk) 04:57, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Mortal sin in the Catholic Church

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Mortal sin in the Catholic Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 August 6#Template:Mortal Sins According To The Catholic Church. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 10:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is An inappropriate template being added to many pages. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Oct13,

I understand that you do not regularly participate in discussions among editors, but I think it would benefit you to come to this discussion at WP:AN and participate in this one that is focused on your editing. It would be better to hear from you than have editors make a decision without your input. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:24, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:35, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have continued to make disruptive edits, and have been cautioned for this repeatedly. Instead of meaningfully engaging with the other editors who have objected, you have just carried right on. While your article editing privileges may at some point be restored, for now you will need to stick to actually discussing on talk pages. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, not a solo effort, and it is expected that editors will engage with concerns raised. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:41, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]