User talk:Lord Cornwallis

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 15 sections are present.

Merger discussion for George Clark (producer)

An article that you have been involved in editing—George Clark (producer)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 4meter4 (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adrienne Marie Louise Grandpierre-Deverzy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wandsbek Studios for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wandsbek Studios is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wandsbek Studios until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Doprendek (talk) 21:18, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:The Loves of Casanova.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:The Loves of Casanova.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 22:48, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Studio Hamburg" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Studio Hamburg has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 30 § Studio Hamburg until a consensus is reached. Doprendek (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Naughty Nanette.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Naughty Nanette.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wiiformii (talk) 20:02, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Tricks (1925 film).jpg

The file File:Tricks (1925 film).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant, better quality exists at File:Tricks (1925) - 1.jpg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wiiformii (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Key of Life.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Key of Life.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Jazz Age (film).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Jazz Age (film).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas F. O'Neill for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas F. O'Neill is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas F. O'Neill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 03:04, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Totò Mignone

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Totò Mignone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Romance of Seville.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A Romance of Seville.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:A Chronicle of the Reign of Charles IX.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:A Chronicle of the Reign of Charles IX.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 12:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:A Chronicle of the Reign of Charles IX.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Chronicle of the Reign of Charles IX.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:An Act at Oxford.png

The file File:An Act at Oxford.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copy of File:An Act at Oxford.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ирука¹³ 21:17, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]