User talk:عبدالرحمن4132

Welcome!

Hi عبدالرحمن4132! I noticed your contributions to Siege of Jeddah and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ActualJoe ❯❯❯ Talk 16:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Battle of Aden (1586), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:43, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Hi عبدالرحمن4132! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Gunpowder empires‎‎ several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Gunpowder empires, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. NebY (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Article request

•Request of article capture of Fez (1549) against portugese empire. •Conquest of republic of sale •Conquest of zawiya of dila Thanks 109.161.164.97 (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Article request

Conquest of Mehdya (1681) Against spanish empire Thanks 109.161.164.97 (talk) 22:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Battle of al-Asnam

I left some notes on the talk page for you, I wanted to try and ping your name there however I really had trouble trying to copy, write it to even do that! Regards Govvy (talk) 12:54, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Mersivan

You should not have moved this draft article into main space; it was in no way ready as it was incomplete, violated multiple Wikipedia policies and was badly written. I've entirely replaced the text with the account of the battle from the article on the Crusade of 1101 and will be watching it carefully from now on. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:55, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

June 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Byzantine–Seljuk wars. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NebY (talk) 14:22, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Sidebar

Having self-reverted after reverting some of the sidebars that you added some article, I noticed that you are now reverting your own additions (without leaving an edit summary). Is there a reason for that? M.Bitton (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

You were right about the redundant templates; I felt they were not needed since we already have a long template. There is no need to add another one. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 15:13, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough. Best, M.Bitton (talk) 15:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Clarify sources on Battle of Al Qunfudhah (1814)

Hello, in this article I see you have abbreviated footnotes to at least two sources, but nowhere on the page do you give a full citation for those works. Please add a "Sources" section with a full WP:Citation for those works. Thanks! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for your reply, I'll be doing that soon. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 23:18, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Burshek

Selamün aleyküm bro, can you put a guard on our newly opened Battle of Burshek page? Some people change results for no reason and without resources. Keremmaarda (talk) 21:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Wa aleikim salam, I've put this page over my watchlist and I'll be checking on it for some time. I don't know if there's any volunteers for that.

One more note: you've added a casualtie number for the Ottomans which is unsourced, kindly provide a source for it. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 23:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Siege of Krujë (1466–1467)

Siege of Krujë (1466–1467) Selamün aleyküm, can you review this page for a while? I am trying to explain that Mehmed was in Macedonia during the siege and I say that he was not in the siege. But someone keeps adding Mehmed again. Keremmaarda (talk) 23:27, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Your recent editing history at Battle of Sangamner shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — SamX [talk · contribs] 01:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — SamX [talk · contribs] 07:10, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Melechha. Thank you. — SamX [talk · contribs] 07:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Siege of Shivneri Fort

The article Siege of Shivneri Fort has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources cited

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SKAG123 (talk) 15:45, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

i've already cited my sources however one person removed him. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 16:12, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

please cite them again and make sure they are appropriate (read WP:RS)

But in this case it might be better to start over SKAG123 (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Castilian War

Hi عبدالرحمن4132 i notice your edit on the Castilian War of 1578. I would like you to revert back where i last edited it. because there are mentions of Spanish attacking Sulu Archipelago and Mindanao in the war section. Thank you. Syazwi Irfan (talk) 07:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello.

I noticed that the article mentions action in the Sulu Archipelago and Mindanao, but I don't think it would count as the campaign was specifically launched against Borneo; they may have attacked them on their way but were not involved in war with Borneo.

I wouldn't mind if you reverted it. Regards. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 09:30, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

discord

can we speak bro? can u come discord pls? im moroccan too — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zayani55 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

what seems to be the issue? We can talk here. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 02:41, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

like we can try to create pages about the moroccan victories in the reconquista i have so mutch sources about it do u agree? Zayani55 (talk) 00:45, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello!

You are free to create articles about Moroccan victories; make sure you provide reliable sources and cover up a lot of information to achieve notability.

I have some articles regarding Reconquista pages to create on the list; however, I don't have much time for them. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 06:15, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

salam ok bro Zayani55 (talk) 09:34, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Battle of Savinsk Forest moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Savinsk Forest. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Crimean campaign (1646)

Hello عبدالرحمن4132! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Crimean campaign (1646), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.reenactor.ru/ARH/PDF/Davies.pdf, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Crimean campaign (1646) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-enwikimedia.org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Crimean campaign (1646), in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Crimean campaign (1646). See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA), version 4.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Crimean campaign (1646) with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Crimean campaign (1646) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 21:11, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on Attack on Jailolo. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:06, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello SunDawn, thank you for your amazing comment i appreciate it, I'm looking forward to expand and create more articles in the future. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 14:20, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Anapa campaign (1790)

The books you added, what year are they? Please add that, and if possible ISBNs. Regards. Govvy (talk) 16:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, check the article again. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on Capture of Julfar. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Savinsk Forest (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Savinsk Forest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Results on some iraq conflicts

hello user عبدالرحمن4132, ive noticed that you have been doing a good job on preserving pages on some iraq conflicts from vandalism made by accounts that dont have sources. I was wondering if you could keep an eye on some battles in the iraq war that have kept being vandalized Because some of them keep being changed from insurgent or iraqi victory to coalition victory, Some of these pages include battle of Basra 2008, 2008 Iraq Spring fighting, and operation together forward, and there are so many more if you want me to name them, thank you 2600:1015:B205:B882:8D80:8C57:781F:99E3 (talk) 20:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

and its not just the iraq war, ir could be things like the iran iraq war or the gulf war 174.219.208.126 (talk) 21:16, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on Siege of Basavapatan. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on Battle of Aranas. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:09, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 06:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at First Barbary War, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on Siege of Córdoba (711). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your reply i appreciate it. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 20:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on Siege of Toron. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Savinsk Forest

Hello, عبدالرحمن4132. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Savinsk Forest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Hello, I'm Abo Yemen. I noticed that you recently removed content from Battle of al-Shihr (1548) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Abo Yemen✉ 10:54, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

The article doesn't mention anything regarding the Ottomans in the siege. The info box should be per article عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 10:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

read the background section Abo Yemen✉ 10:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

The background section states the following: Dom Álvaro, therefore, decided to take his flotilla to Ash-Shihr and expunge the fort near al-Shihr, which was captured by the Kathiri Sultan Badr

In the background mention the recapture of Aden by the Ottomans, not Al-Shihr. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 11:01, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

I dont know much about the battle. You do you Abo Yemen✉ 11:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Actually, I've re-edited the article in the past, which originally stated the Ottomans in the siege, but by checking the sources, they mention nothing regarding the Ottomans.

You can check the history of the page. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 11:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

you can add the removed text back if it had sources supporting it Abo Yemen✉ 11:10, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

There's none, unfortunately.

If you have sources that prove otherwise, proceed to add them. Until now, the Ottomans will be removed. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

i dont have any Abo Yemen✉ 11:29, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Moldavia campaign articles

Hello, I see you recently created four articles on Jan III's campaign for Moldavia in the Polish–Ottoman War (1683–1699). They all seem to be about the same thing, just different aspects of the campaign for Moldavia, so I think it would be best if those four article were either merged into the Polish-Ottoman war article, as that article is already pretty short and is well below splitting length, or merge the four articles into a new article about the campaign, maybe "Moldavian campaign (1684–1691)". I assume that, as the same sources are used throughout the four articles, that those sources generally focus on the campaign as a whole, whereas there are no sources presented that talk solely about the campaign for a specific year, for example 1684. Therefore, it would be better to present the articles how the phases of the campaign are shown in the sources. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 19:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi!

personally, i would go with the second option. The Polish Ottoman war were not limited to Moldavian campaigns and surely there were other theaters of the war. I was planning to expand the article of 1683-1699, however, due to lack of time recently, i won't get to do it soon. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 02:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

I merged the four articles into Moldavian campaign (1684–1691). Let me know if there's anything else you think should be done with the articles. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 13:33, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Can you also please provide page numbers for the references to the books by Marcin Markowicz and Podhorodetsky Leszek? You provided page numbers to the other two sources but not to those and as you have the sources and read them (I assume) and I do not, you likely know from which pages you got this information. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 17:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)

Battle articles

Hi! Many thanks for creating articles on neglected battles and operations of the Ottoman-Venetian wars. However, two requests: first, please spend a little more time to provide adequate context for the reader who is not familiar with the conflicts, instead of jumping in in media res. Second, please show a little more care in sourcing and referencing, e.g. do not use sources that are entirely outdated, if not unreliable, like Rycaut in Siege of Lemnos (1657), or provide the page numbers used e.g. for Beihammer in Battle of Caesarea (1073). These are things that require little additional effort but make a difference in the long run. Cheers, Constantine ✍ 21:36, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi thanks for these notes I'll consider it. I'll try my best to provide reliable sources as possible. Regarding page numbers, I'm aware of this problem, the book in Google reads sometimes don't provide page numbers at all. I try to find another accessible edition of the book but seems impossible sometimes. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 21:59, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

The books with no page numbers are usually e-book/epub versions, there is usually a 'regular' version to be found for the same work if you go to 'Other editions'. I also have a quite extensive library on these periods and topics, feel free to ask for any works that you need. Constantine ✍ 10:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

hi

can you help me to create wiki pages , i want to create about muslim victories in the reconquista Tahanido (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello, if you wish to write articles you can read more here to learn. Help:Your first article.

But to summarize:

1) Reliable sources make sure you use well known Academic secondary sources, avoid Primary sources. Read more about here Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You can use google books to search about a specific topic.

2) Achieve notability make sure your article achieve notability i.e having significant coverage and details. Avoid writing trivial (mere mention of a topic) with small or no details at all like this.[1]. You can read about it here.Wikipedia:Notability

3) Sandbox sandboxes are a workspace where you can practice writing article without having anyone to intervene. You can read more about it here.Wikipedia:About the sandbox

What are topics did you come across? and make sure that there are already existing article regarding this topic to avoid double article issues, this happens sometimes. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 16:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

can i contact you? Tahanido (talk) 16:54, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Where? You can ask your doubts here. عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 16:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

do u have discord ? Tahanido (talk) 17:15, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes Abdulrahman_4132#3066 عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 17:43, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

i send you a friend request Tahanido (talk) 21:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Just to let you know, this editor was a sockpuppet. If they reach out to you with another account, you can report then at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/بوكوس. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:48, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi عبدالرحمن4132. Thank you for your work on 1924 retreat from Chefchaoun. Another editor, Netherzone, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 00:55, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks عبدالرحمن4132 (talk) 05:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)