User talk:1ctinus

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! (nice sandbox) —Qwerfjkltalk 18:11, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

New message from Qwerfjkl

Hello, 1ctinus. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 20:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

―Qwerfjkltalk 20:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

My bad 🥴. I searched it up and it's not as common as I thought it was. Sorry about my bad suggestions recently, I was using a laptop and was suggesting more for the sake of it from successful requests. 1ctinus (talk) 21:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Bill Wurtz userbox

heya! if you'd like to make the link green (or some other color) as well, feel free to use this: [[Bill Wurtz|{{font|color=#0f0|text=bill wurtz}}]] (bill wurtz) Vukky^🌞 (talk • not a bot) 19:06, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Sounds.. plausible. i will make it a lighter green. 1ctinus📝🗨 19:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elin Pelin Point, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bulgarian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi!

Just wanted to say hi, I noticed we were both working on User:Uhai/Pages_without_short_descriptions_by_view_count when I was about to add an SD to an article on the list and saw you already did so before the bot updated the page. Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk / contribs)} 02:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

sounds correct -1ctinus📝🗨 02:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Short descriptions

Hey there, I wanted to ask: what do you feel is the utility of a short description like the one on Foreign relations of China? I realize I might've spent today undoing a lot of your work, and I want to cool it immediately if I'm not helping. Remsense诉 12:30, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

The utility is to differentiate between articles that are missing a short description and don’t need a short description. Some articles don’t need a short description if their titles are self-describing, such as “foreign relations of china”. see this page for more information -1ctinus📝🗨 12:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Right, I agree! I ask because you re-added a short description to that page a few days ago, and I was about to set it to "none" before I noticed. Remsense诉 12:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

My basic criteria is that if i can’t make a short description that isn’t just the title arraigned in a different way with the same words, it should be blank. -1ctinus📝🗨 12:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello 1ctinus!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Template:Infobox referendum

Hello - re your addition of a default description of simply 'referendum', would it not be better to follow WP:SDNONE and have a short description which was the same as the article title (which in all cases, will be more detailed than just 'referendum'). Cheers, Number 57 00:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Not all Referendums have "Referendum" in their title name. WP:SDNONE would not apply for those articles. That being said, with referendums that have "referendum" in their title it would, and that could be coded into the template to have a switch case for "none" for articles with "Referendum" in their title, and a year to go alongside it. I might program both but dealing with the wikitext code is super annoying and time consuming. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:47, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

@Number 57  Done -1ctinus📝🗨 01:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Having mulled it over some more, there are other quite important issues, the first one being quite serious:

1. The infobox is used on quite a lot of non-referendum articles (like 51st state or Inverness Caledonian Thistle F.C.) and you are giving such articles an incorrect short description if there is not one there already
2. Articles that use the infobox include referendums, plebiscites and ballot measures. A short description of "referendum" is not appropriate for plebiscites as in some countries that has a different legal meaning to a referendum (and will look weird in other cases – readers may be thinking 'Why is the article title 'plebiscite' but the description 'referendum'?')
3. I'm also not sure 'referendum' is an appropriate short description for ballot measures?

Based on these issues, I think it might actually be best to abandon using the infobox to add a short description? Number 57 01:50, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Number 1 is addressed in the code by Is infobox in lead. Number 2 and 3 are serious concerns that I don't know how to deal with since I do not know the difference between those terms. A more broad term might be useful. It also might be more useful to put this discussion in the Template talk instead of my user page. -1ctinus📝🗨 02:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

WT:E&R is probably the best place to discuss, but for now I would advise removing it from the template code. Cheers, Number 57 02:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Re: matches against Portugal

Not a problem if there was a mistake, but the row for Portugal in the table now reads: played 2, won 2, lost 1. Please clarify and adjust as appropriate, making sure that the totals at the foot of the columns are also consistent. Thanks. Ehrenkater (talk) 16:43, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Oh dear. Which article? I was running batch edits to add short descriptions and I made a huge mistake by forgetting to filter out articles without short descriptions. I ran a batch reverter to revert the most recent edits on the page, so any edits that may have been made in the last hour have been reverted to fix the fuck up I made. that may be why. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

My mistake is now fixed, I reverted everything that needed to be. I act in good faith and I add short descriptions to a lot of sports articles, and fixing batch edits is pretty simple if I can figure it out and not be the greatest dev. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Short descriptions of books

I have had to replace several new short descriptions of books you have added that say only that the book is by somebody or other. That is useless as a short description. If the book comes up in a mobile search, readers are going to see that short description and be uninformed. Say what the book is about, not who wrote it. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

See WP:SDEXAMPLES. There's only so much you can fit in ~40 characters. Saying the year, what kind of book it is, and who wrote it are all important to any literary work, even if its non-fiction. That's why this format is standard and used -1ctinus📝🗨 16:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Feel free to do the 50 or so articles on mathematics books articles that don't have a short description here. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)

Short Description on Iowa Township

Hi. I modified your short description on Iowa Township, Marshall County, Iowa to read "none" per WP:SDNONE. I wanted to draw your attention to it for your future reference or, if I was mistaken, so you can let me know so I don't make messes by erroneously changing the short description. Thanks for your work! EducatedRedneck (talk) 19:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Fair, I was editing hundreds of township articles to have a short description, and it is a little repetitive of a short description so if you want to change hundreds of mine to none I would be fine with that. -1ctinus📝🗨 20:23, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Vice presidential candidate selection pages

(short description|none) already appears on all of these pages. Why are you duplicating it? --Onorem (talk) 21:23, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

this was a mistake. Shit. -1ctinus📝🗨 21:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

This is fixed. This is embarrassing... when searching for articles to add, I misspelled "short description" as "shrot description". -1ctinus📝🗨 21:36, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion

Hello, 1ctinus,

Please do not blank a page after you tag if for speedy deletion. A patrolling admin needs to see why it was tagged and removing all of the content prevents that from happening. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

sorry -1ctinus📝🗨 00:36, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Your interactions and final edit summary at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burlington mayoral elections were top notch. It might seem simple, but you really reminded me what being a good Wikipedian (mensch!) is about. Thank you and regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! It’s funny how my first barn star is a failed nomination, but life is like that sometimes. There was another user who flamed out on AfDs and got banned for a month for it, and I didn’t want to be like him. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:34, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

I think people who last here (and are the most collaborative) are the ones who admit that they've always got things to learn, no matter how long they've been around. Almost 18 years for me and am still learning things (and making mistakes!). Kind regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 00:40, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Would you be so kind as to remove the AfD tags from the remaining articles which had been nominated? Admins and others frequently use a script to close discussions, but it does a poor job of untagging “also nominated” articles. Thanks! --Finngall ^talk 14:56, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Consolidating

Hi, When consolidating political articles please ensure all appropriate information is transfered to the consolidation page. For the consolidated article on Alexandria's mayoral election's, only the information regarding the Democratic primary was transfered to the consolidated version. I have already re-added information for the general election and the corresponding map, but from now on please all information is moved during consolidation so no more time is wasted re-adding information. Thanks! Incognito melon (talk) 04:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

What is DescDash and why is it inserting invisible nbsp characters?

It appears that you are doing a lot of great work with short descriptions, possibly using a tool called DescDash. In this edit, the short description ended up with an invisible nbsp character that needed to be fixed. If you have control over this tool, can you please persuade it to use regular space characters? – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

It’s a tool I used to quickly add short descriptions to novels. I didn’t notice that. I will fix it. Sorry about that -1ctinus📝🗨 16:36, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Is this widespread or just this one article? -1ctinus📝🗨 16:37, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

It has occurred in at least a few dozen of your edits. You can see some of the articles in this report from yesterday. The current version of the report shows that the errors have been cleaned up. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello, 1ctinus. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

New page reviewer granted

Hi 1ctinus, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

• Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
• If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
• If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Removing Promotional Language

Yesterday, I created an article on Wikipedia titled 'Soft Power of India in Africa'—link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Soft_power_of_India_in_Africa

As a skilled programmer, you may have noticed that the article was written in a promotional tone. I have since made improvements. Could you please suggest any sentences or External links that still need to be more neutral and non-promotional? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Shahidullah-Bin-Anwar (talk • contribs) 06:02, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

Edit summary Civility

Hello,

Just noticed your edit on Dead Internet Theory. The page is still under construction, and a lot of the "see also" section is stuff that is hoped to be worked into the main article in the future but lacks adequate citations at the moment. We may need an internet culture infobox to make the list a bit shorter. I trimmed it to 10 links from 16 though.

This comment is regarding your edit summary however. The comment when you added the template, "jesus," had me a bit confused for a bit as we do have mention of "Shrimp Jesus" on the page. When I realized that it was your comment on the content of the section however, I decided to drop by and leave a message. Wikipedia:Civility states that edit summaries should "Be clear about what you did, so that other editors can assess your changes accurately," "Use neutral language," and "Don't make snide comments," among other things. I don't think your edit summary met this criteria, but may be wrong and misunderstanding how you intended the comment to be read. Just thought I'd let you know how it came off to me, so you could be aware for future edit summaries and avoid any misunderstandings in the future. GeogSage ^{(⚔Chat?⚔)} 16:45, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

sorry about the edit summary. -1ctinus📝🗨 16:51, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Grant Nel

On 16 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grant Nel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grant Nel, at the age of nine, switched from gymnastics to diving after breaking both of his hands? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grant Nel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grant Nel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

Upcoming expiry of your patroller right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your permission "patroller" (New page reviewers) will expire on 0:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC). For most rights, you will need to renew at WP:PERM, unless you have been told otherwise when your right was approved. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 04:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Redirect CSDs

Hello, if you are nominating a redirect for deletion, please try to use one of the redirect-specific CSD criteria, such as WP:R3. G6 is okay but the R-cats are specifically for redirects. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 21:46, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to 1ctinus for accumulating at least 100 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC)