User talk:ToadetteEdit

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is ToadetteEdit's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8: 7 days

Mondex Corp

(moving stale discussion from user talk:ToadetteEdit/guestbook) Another reviewer should review your draft. Putting here for archival purposes. 18:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Toadette – Good morning (or afternoon). Last we communicated, I believe we agreed that notability was the sticking point that was stopping the article from proceeding to further editing. I then indicated to you at least three sources, listed in the draft, that attested to notability. Can you please take a look at them and let me know if they are sufficient. I have put a good deal of work into this project ad would like to see it through. EditorRechts (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Question from Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor on User talk:Valereee (19:03, 11 January 2025)

Good weekend, I wanted to ask if you have seen my last inquiry sent nine days or so ago? Thank you. --Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 19:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor, I've read the inquiry that you posted on Valereee's talk page. Of course, sources are welcome regardless of language. But I advise you against writing an autobiography as per this comment. As for the unanswered comment, which says [C]an I ask [Valereee] more questions so that I can get a full picture of what kinds of three sources I can submit to meet your criteria; for example, if someone's name can be found on the net, not just once, can that web page link count? Also, if someone's profile is being recognized and published on their industry sites of credibility and history, can it be seen as a reliable resource independent of that said individual?

1) The three sources should be reliable, secondary ones that are independent and should discuss the subject in depth. Do not rely on the results of the searches because some websites are not reliable, like profiles and blog entries. 2)Yes, if these sources meet the criteria described in point one. ToadetteEdit (2025 is here) 19:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to receive your guidance again. Kindly inform me if the submission is a one-time thing, or is there a rule on how many times one submission can be submitted (after editing, having new material from new resources, or anything like those) for a subject.

I've gone through the "Reliable sources" page. I have published books by reliable publishers and self-published books also by reliable publishers, so are they qualified to be reviewed together by Wikipedia editors?

As for the web contents, is it deemed reliable if it is an established industry website which purpose is like a dictionary for that industry? For example, Baidu? or an interview published on a film festival's website? or an award won at international film festivals?

Thank you. Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 22:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor, there is no definite number of submission attempts you are allowed, but if you submit the article too many times and gets rejected, you may not be able to submit it again. If you are the author of the sources as described in this comment, you may use these, unless you are writing about yourself or about a person whom you have a close relationship with. If you are writing about an industry, if the sources are from their official website, then it is a primary source and should be avoided. Baidu is not a reliable source, so do interviews, but okay for film awards. Hope that helps! ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:14, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your comments are very helpful for a newcomer like me. However, I need to follow up with one or two of your notes. For interviews, what if it's one conducted and published by an established newspaper? For film awards, do we submit our award list organized by a reliable resource? Ok, another one, when I submit, are you the reviewer or Valereee whom I submit to, and can I submit one item at a time so I can have a chance to know if it's rejected so that I can submit a replacement until I have submitted three items successfully? Thank you! Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 19:59, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1) An interview that has dialogue between the subject and another person is often regarded as primary and should be avoided. Summarized interviews are okay to be used as a source. 2) For film awards, yes. 3) Anyone can review your draft submission to determine whether the topic meets Wikipedia standards. ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. So, a screenshots or digital picture of film or other awards are acceptable as a source. I gather I am correct by saying that, am I not?

Also, just want to be sure of one thing regarding interviews, is an interview that is in Q & A format more acceptable? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 21:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Screenshots and Q&A interviews are generally avoided as they are often unreliable. ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Just to make sure, did you mean screenshots for all other items aside of those for interviews too? Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes... ToadetteEdit (talk) 18:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then I must not send any screenshots. Thanks again. Allpeoplearepeopleofcolor (talk) 21:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Skylett06 (10:01, 21 January 2025)

I have a question, I have made 2 edits a few days ago, but here it says 0 edits made. Not sure why it says that since when I've made the changes it said they were published and saved --Skylett06 (talk) 10:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Skylett06, in what language have you edited so far. I can see some uploads on Commons, but you haven't edited here (wiki.riteme.site) up until now. ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I figured it out, thank you so much! 5.2.215.188 (talk) 13:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of administrators without tools

	Greetings, ToadetteEdit. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: Dclemens1971
Thank you for supporting this effort. Your contributions are an integral part of overall success, and an example for others to follow. To stop receiving these notifications, remove your name from the list.

Tol Bot (talk) 21:00, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#Template:Manitoba rail network

As the deleting administrator for the template currently sought to be restored at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion, your opinion would be useful in this discussion. Cheers! BD2412 T 03:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Malhar1234 (07:26, 25 January 2025)

How I send WP:WAR warning to someone who try to vandalise wikipedia article continuously? --Malhar1234 (talk) 07:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Use this template: {{subst:uw-ew}} ToadetteEdit (talk) 09:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Improper use of pseudo-headers

Hey, @ToadetteEdit. I saw on one of your CVUA subpages that you use a semi-colon (;) instead of three apostrophes like what a normal bold is for. Make sure to use normal bolding instead of semicolon markup to be sure to follow MOS:PSEUDOHEAD. Thanks, Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 17:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cowboygilbert, I have changed the markup on two of the subpages. Let me know if there's more. Thanks! ToadetteEdit (talk) 17:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Congressn3rd316 (20:31, 26 January 2025)

Hey Toadette,

I was editing the Avondale,AZ page more specifically the mayors page cause the city has a new mayor Mike Pineda and I was trying to add a reference but I couldn’t figure it out. If you could check it out and either tell me how to correct it or correct it yourself that would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks,

Congressn3rd316 --Congressn3rd316 (talk) 20:31, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it. Jessicapierce (talk) 23:28, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Congressn3rd316 (01:00, 27 January 2025)

I don’t need you to look over the Avondale az page anymore another person fixed the mistake --Congressn3rd316 (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]