User Talk:Freedoxm

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Freedoxm, the "500 edits and an account age of 30 days" restriction applies to internal discussions such as Special:Diff/1252133822 (requested moves, "RMs") too. See WP:ECR for details about this type of restriction. It used to be more explicit about this, but now simply everything except edit requests is prohibited, and participating in a discussion isn't making an edit request. This could be made less confusing, I guess, and I don't blame you for having been unaware of this. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:34, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for reminding me. I just saw the rule that says that you must be extended-protected to talk. 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 23:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi Freedoxm, I understand your frustration and I am thankful for your message on my talk page; I'd even like to restore it if you allow me to. Seeing a page being technically editable, spending time on writing something constructive and having it reverted instantly is almost guaranteed to upset the writer, and I didn't mean to. Regarding opinions: Opinions on talk pages are a difficult topic in general, not just for the Arab-Israeli conflict or other formally contentious topics. You did a good job at focusing on the Wikipedia-side of the issue and on the content itself. Others have more difficulty in distinguishing between their personal opinion about a conflict and what an encyclopedia should contain about it. In extreme cases, even normally-allowed comments are removed for using Wikipedia as a discussion forum or even using Wikipedia as a battleground. So I wouldn't worry too much about the revert if possible; it's the least severe reason for which a comment could be removed at all. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

thanks, but there is no need to restore it 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 00:01, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Okay, no problem. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:03, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Youre a [ __ ] [ __ ] Palestinian children they can go die in rubble like the rest of the 40,000 don't ever undo my edit

long live israel 216.54.161.22 (talk) 06:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

i will report u if you wont stop 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 06:36, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Attacks on the United States

Hey Freedoxm! I came across your profile during some of your recent editing in regard to the Syrian conflict. I've been working on a big project over the last few weeks: Attacks on the United States. The aim is to have a list of every time the U.S. (government/military) was attacked, but not when the U.S. was attacking. My hope is to create attacks by the United States once this list is finished.

Well anyway, I wanted to see if you would be interested in helping me put together some of the summaries for the list. I am fairly sure most of the attacks themselves are on the list. But, I'm still working to get the summaries and references put together for each of them. If you are interested or have any questions, feel free to message me back here or on my talk page anytime! If not, I completely understand. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 03:54, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Politics are not usually allowed on this talk page, but i'll make it an exception. Unfortunately, I am not interested, as I will have many other articles to edit, and they are my personal hobby to do. Thanks for messaging me! 🗽Freedoxm🗽 (talk) 04:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

[Redacted] Theofunny (talk) 16:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Clearly, It's not a mishmash. It's a personal opinion. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 18:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

[Redacted] Theofunny (talk) 12:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

No problem, I am redacting the comments. I did not mean to offend you. Theofunny (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

ok 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Undiscussed move

For Ko Yong Hui, the move you made requires evidence and a move discussion. See WP:KOREANNAME; we recommend against spaces in names by default, unless that is the proven WP:COMMONNAME practice. seefooddiet (talk) 22:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Okay, but i'll discuss on the article's talk page to move it back to Ko Yong Hui as her son, Kim Jong Un, is supreme leader, and same, has the space between the last names. Thanks for letting me know! 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 00:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Why change direct use of template to redirected use?

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks!

So, why did you make this edit to Tahrir al-Sham, changing the use of {{redirect category shell}} to the redirected shorthand {{rcat shell}}? Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 07:54, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

I use the edit summary around 70% of the time, and I removed the redirect category shell to the rcat shell because it's simplified and has less bytes. Also, is there a problem with changing that? Thanks for your comment ob this talk page. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 17:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

also i just added the preference. thank you! 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 17:55, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

63.7% as of just now. Those few bytes are not worth the edit, and "redirect category shell" is clearer to understand that "rcat shell". Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 21:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

80% Disagree with the rcat shell issue. I'm not willing to argue or making this a big deal so this will be my last reply on this topic. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)