User talk:Heatrave

This is Heatrave's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Why copy and rewrite someone’s article Latest comment: 13 hours ago 1 comment 1 person in discussion You created this article (https://w.wiki/9Bav) lifted someone’s hard work of reasearching . Its unfair to copy and rewritesomeone article in the sanbox and quickly publish first. As a newbie we help in reviewing articles by newbies as we encourage them from their sandbox. When community members participate in contest and this kind of things happens they stop newbies from staying in the community. In as much as this is free and open, the right thing needs to be done. If all volunteers do this there is no point contesting and participatning in contest or feeling like they have done something when we are in a community that also give credit to volunteers based on their edits.

This act is unfair and this article must be reversed to rightful person who started the research to publish. As you can see here - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adansi11/sandbox.

This act must not be entertained in this space. Wikimedia stands for fairness and inclusivity.

must be pulled down to allow the rightful person to go ahead to publish. As you can see here - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adansi11/sandbox.

This act must not be entertained in the Wikimedia space. Wikimedia stand for fairness and inclusion.

Ruby D-Brown (talk) 09:37, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heatrave (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 197.251.187.104. My ISP keeps changing the IP Address. Heatrave (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, that's dynamic IP for you. Instead of getting into a really technical argument about whether your IP is an open proxy, I will just tell you that for that very reason it's much easier to advise you to use different devices, perhaps on another IP, to edit, and/or go to WP:IPECPROXY and request IP block exemption per the instructions there, which do not require editing access to follow. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heatrave (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 41.210.5.81.Heatrave (talk) 11:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That IP is a P2P proxy. It will need to be turned off, your browser cache cleared, and a 24 hour wait before editing. Alternatively, you can proceed as described above. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kwame Yogot (May 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Needs independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kwame Yogot and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kwame Yogot, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 11:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heatrave! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 11:30, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kwame Yogot

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kwame Yogot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://beatznation.com/profile/kwame-yogot/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 13:55, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heatrave (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 197.251.181.251. I was previously using a VPN but even after removing it, i'm still unable to edit. Heatrave (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is a confirmed P2P proxy. Yamla (talk) 15:30, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Ghun (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Ghun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans (talk) 10:40, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Technical Barnstar

Hello Heatrave,

This barnstar is awarded to you to appreciate your effort in contributing to the African Wikimedia Technical Hackathon in the month of July. We say a big thank you for contributing to this hackathon.

We look forward to seeing you at future Wikimedia Technical events. JDQ Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk) 13:08, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Big Ghun (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Big Ghun and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 06:55, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Heatrave (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 102.176.94.231. I don't use a VPN and not responsible for the changing IP addressHeatrave (talk) 17:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed P2P proxy and frankly, you appear to be wasting our time here. You've been given a path forward which would allow you to continue using these P2P proxies. If you aren't interested in following it, stop making unblock requests. Yamla (talk) 17:34, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, Draft:Big Ghun

Hello, Heatrave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Big Ghun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz what happens if I create a new one under the same name Heatrave (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Prince Kojo-Hilton

Hello, Heatrave,

Thank you for creating Prince Kojo-Hilton.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for writing this. The subject seems notable: would you mind adding more sources so we can better verify this article's content.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 14:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: AMG Armani (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Princess of Ara was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:AMG Armani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Princess of Ara 12:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cape Town Stock Exchange

The article Cape Town Stock Exchange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable stock exchange, not enough information to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:49, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Seychelles Blue Bond

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Seychelles Blue Bond, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:AfCFTA Mechanisms has been nominated for renaming

Category:AfCFTA Mechanisms has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 21:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slut Boy Billy (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Boomplay is not a recognized chart (see WP:CHARTS) and most of the sources are not reliable (MyjoyOnline, Pulse, Ghana Music, GhanaWeb, etc.) as they are either exist for promotional/advertising purposes or are user-generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Slut Boy Billy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:59, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 thank you for your meticulous feedback.

As per Wikipedia's defining criteria of a Record chart (referenced in the article as a music chart), it includes streaming activity, number of sales and number of downloads as chart criteria. Hence the reference is duly warranted as a noteworthy mention.

Boomplay is the biggest streaming platform in Africa and is critical to the growth of music from the African continent. Recently, through an official announcement, data from Boomplay will count towards Billboard official chart ratings. At any point in time, there are a maximum of 100 songs on Top 100 which would not accomodate artistes on a global scale. Infact, Billboard chart is scaled towards the US Market primarily before everywhere else. This alone makes it difficult for indie artistes even in the United States to earn a place on the chart, talk less of elsewhere. A UCLA article has raised concerns about the bias of the Billboard chart and this in effect raises concerns on the some criteria and sections of WP:Charts.

To the topic of user-generated content, it can Heatrave (talk) 11:39, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 thank you for your meticulous feedback.

As per Wikipedia's defining criteria of a Record chart (referenced in the article as a music chart), it includes streaming activity, number of sales and number of downloads as chart criteria. Hence the reference is duly warranted as a noteworthy mention.

Boomplay is the biggest streaming platform in Africa and is critical to the growth of music from the African continent. Recently, through an official announcement, data from Boomplay will count towards Billboard official chart ratings. At any point in time, there are a maximum of 100 songs on Top 100 which would not accomodate artistes on a global scale. Infact, Billboard chart is scaled towards the US Market primarily before everywhere else. This alone makes it difficult for indie artistes even in the United States to earn a place on the chart, talk less of elsewhere. A UCLA article has raised concerns about the bias of the Billboard chart and this in effect raises concerns on the some criteria and sections of WP:Charts.

To the topic of user-generated content, it can be quite tricky as most online platforms have some form of user-generated content. Here is an example from Forbes, which has a section on its platform that features articles from vetted contributors. Does this suddenly discredit the platfom? Or will a submission be rejected because it was sources from a Forbes contributor article?

Promotion as defined by Wikitionary, indicates the dissemination of information in order to increase its popularity. Without promotion, there are a myriad of information that will go unnoticed. Every source, whether independently written or not can be quoted for promotional purposes especially within the music space. The number one song on billboard chart, will in effect promote the song and lead to more sales, despite being independently drafted into the chart.

Please review your reasons for the rejection and propose improvements. Heatrave (talk) 12:04, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Heatrave, Record chart is a Wikipedia article and not relevant to the notability guidelines for musicians or the related WP:CHARTS guideline, which are based upon consensus by the Wikipedia community. If you believe it a chart meets the inclusion guidelines outlined at WP:CHARTS, you can start a discussion on the talk page to get consensus to include it but note it states Charts which rank material from a single vendor or network are generally unsuitable for inclusion in articles. As for WP:user-generated content, regardless of the publisher, those are generally considered unreliable and cannot be used to establish notability. For Forbes specifically, see WP:FORBESCON which states article's written by contributors are considered user-generated so generally not reliable. You are correct that a source writing about a topic may inherently promote that topic regardless if the coverage is positive or negative. Even so, sources must meet the reliable source criteria and must be independent to count toward notability. S0091 (talk) 14:00, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ink Boy (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ink Boy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant 17:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Niphkeys moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Niphkeys. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ibjaja055 (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on University of Ghana

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page University of Ghana, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:21, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 07:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Greenman that section of Patoranking's profile hasn't been updated in a while. He has received multiple awards and nominations and i am working on improving this after gathering all information. Heatrave (talk) 23:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yusif Meizongo Jnr moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yusif Meizongo Jnr. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message.

I agree that there are sections of the article that sounded promotional but that was not the intention. Fortunately, I received help from an editor to correct that and hence i believe that is fixed. The topic is very notable as he is one of the few perfumers in Africa.

I will like you to review your decision as this article has been adequately cited. That industry is very niche and may not have 1000s of citations but meets all the notability requirements as stated by Wikipedia Heatrave (talk) 23:02, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Heatrave. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Yusif Meizongo Jnr, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:20, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what is your relationship to Yusif Meizongo Jnr? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:21, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing i have no relationship with the subject. Maybe you can say that we are both African but I like to write about African stories and increase the representation of our people on the platform. He happens to operate in a niche category of Fragrance makers, something i find interesting because I didn't know we had people in this space. Heatrave (talk) 06:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The photo used in that article, which you uploaded as your 'own work' – it has clearly been taken at close quarters; can you tell me how you came to take that picture, if you've no personal or professional connection to this person? Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing OK i get the confusion. I didn't take the picture. Possibly a mistake on my part. It is the work of the subject found during my research for the article. How can I rectify this? Thank you for bringing it to my notice. Heatrave (talk) 06:48, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I'll edit it out of the article, and request that it is deleted. Please don't upload images belonging to third parties, as this violates copyright law. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:59, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing thank you for the rectification. I appreciate it. Heatrave (talk) 07:03, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing can i use a third party picture and attribute? Or does that also violate copyright? Heatrave (talk) 07:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The short answer is no. That's because images uploaded into Wikimedia Commons are made freely available in the public domain. So if you upload someone else's content, even with attribution, you are taking away their copyright, and they are unlikely to be very happy with that.

There are some very limited 'fair use' exceptions, eg. company logos and music album covers can be used in the articles on those topics, and of course some things are not in copyright to begin with (mainly if they've been released under a compatible Creative Commons licence, or are so old that the copyright has already expired), but these are relatively rare exceptions.

All that being said, I'm not really an expert on this, so if you have questions about copyright or what can be uploaded and how, you can ask at the Commons help desk. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DoubleGrazing thank you for your assistance. Heatrave (talk) 07:28, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yusif Meizongo Jnr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yusif Meizongo Jnr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusif Meizongo Jnr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:37, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TimtrentTimtrentg why has this been nominated for deletion? Heatrave (talk) 09:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit the deletion discussion, where your opinion is welcome. The rationale is there. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:51, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yusif Meizongo Jnr (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The references consist of interviews with the subject, some with commentary, and gossip column-like material, coupled with apparent churnalism. It requires complete re-referencing in order to move forwards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 11:44, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yusif Meizongo Jnr (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 19:32, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne Thanks for your feedback. Please can you provide assistance on improving references for the article. Thanks in advance. Heatrave (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Heatrave Articles about people must pass the WP:NPEOPLE test. Most of your sources are interviews with Yusif, which can not be used to establish notability. The sources you use must be:

- Reliable: Your article should rely on strong, reliable sources that are published by reputable institutions. Primary sources can be used for basic facts (such as a date of creation), but they should be supplemented with strong secondary sources that offer analysis, review, discussion, or interpretation.

- Independent: Your sources should be independent of the subject, for example not self-published or from the subject's own website, and not interviews with people directly connected to the topic.

- Show significant coverage: Your subject should be discussed in detail in the sources you find. The sources should provide in-depth information or analysis about the subject, going beyond basic facts or promotional material.

- From multiple places: Ideally we would like to see three separate reliable, independent, secondary sources that discuss your subject.

- Not original research: Wikipedia articles should summarise existing knowledge about a subject, not present new research. This means you should avoid drawing your own conclusions or analyses from the sources. Stick to summarising what the sources say in a neutral tone.

If you cannot find sources that are appropriate, then I am afraid there can be no article about Yusif at this time.

Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert Kwame Kyei Baffour (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albert Kwame Kyei Baffour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish)} 15:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MicrobiologyMarcus thank you for your feedback. Unfortunately I disagree with the part on the notability of the subject. The article doesn't focus on the subject but mostly on his work. It is very common in the creative art industry especially in films for the people behind the film to be receive less headlines and coverage than the actor. Most of the sources used have made mention of his contribution to the works. It is against the guidelines of Wikipedia to state something without claim and hence I stuck to mostly his works.

With regards to the tone and NPV, i have tried as much as possible meet the requirements. However if you can highlight where i need to improve, i will be more than happy to do that. Heatrave (talk) 23:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yusif Meizongo Jnr (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Kyei Baffour moved to Draft:Albert Kyei Baffour

I have moved this article back to draft, as it is woefully inadequate for mainspace. Yes, the person has directed/written some things. But, the sources used all mention this person in passing. There's nothing in the sources that rise above passing mention. Please carefully read WP:SIGCOV in particular where it says "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention". --Hammersoft (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've just realized that this draft is a copy of Draft:Albert Kwame Kyei Baffour, which was also denied submission for insufficient sources. Moving forward, please pick one or the other to develop, not both. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with sources

Observing a number of notices on your talk page here, and seeing various attempts at drafts, it would appear you are having significant difficulty in understanding sourcing for articles. Please understand the following is intended to help. You'll need to read a few things. First, it would be a good idea for you to review our General Notability Guideline. You should also read through Wikipedia:Reliable sources and this which will help you understand the difference between primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. In general, we try to focus on using secondary sources here.

I would suggest that you stop moving things to mainspace for the time being, and instead focus on properly developing drafts. I would also encourage you to stop re-submitting drafts that have been previously declined when you've added very little or nothing at all, such as you have done at Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr.

If you have any questions about any of this, please let me know. I'll be happy to help. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Patoranking. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:20, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yusif Meizongo Jnr (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability: The ghanaweb source reads like a pure puff piece, the third source has no depth of content about the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yusif Meizongo Jnr (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yusif Meizongo Jnr and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ga Traditional Council (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ga Traditional Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maison Yusif (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maison Yusif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces is it a problem with all the sources or just a few? Some of them are actually reliable.

But thank you for the feedback. Please be more specific so i know what exactly to work on. Heatrave (talk) 19:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Heatrave There problem here is that the sources cited are majorly promotional pieces. (PS: You don't have to start arguing that, it's something I know). So, you can't show notability in that manner, we need citations to sources that are reliable, independent of the subject and covers the subject significantly or at least close significance. Nothing currently like that in the sources currently cited. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert Kwame Kyei Baffour (November 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Albert Kwame Kyei Baffour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ink Boy (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ink Boy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:31, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maison Yusif (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maison Yusif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 00:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ink Boy (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ink Boy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maison Yusif (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maison Yusif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maison Yusif (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unclear what's supposed to main this company notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maison Yusif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Kwame Boadu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Samuel Kwame Boadu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Samuel Kwame Boadu (1)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Samuel Kwame Boadu (1) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Kwame Boadu. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Heatrave, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Heatrave|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:06, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae I do not have knowledge of a pre-existing article and do not have knowledge of a said financial motivation. Perhaps the previous editor did but i have not received any such financial incentive for this edit. Heatrave (talk) 23:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say anything about any other article. If you have no connection to any of the subjects you've written about, please explain how this, this, this, this, this, this and about 100 others are your own work, yet you have no connection with any subject? GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae the pictures are taken from a public repository for the events that the subject performed. I understand the confusion is from the "own work" label, but i am not a photographer, neither did i take those photos. Heatrave (talk) 23:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yet you uploaded them stating specifically that it was your own work and you had full copyright. Why should we believe anything else you say? GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae I did a previous search before writing this article and did provide all citations to back any statement. The subject was recommended. If there is a previous thread or article that was done for the subject and subsequently deleted, then i have no idea. I adhere strictly to all wikipedia guidelines and have not received any payments for this edit. Please advise on next steps. Heatrave (talk) 23:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ask any of that in my previous question. How are the dozens of photos you uploaded your own work? GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:18, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae the subject was already mentioned in previous articles such as Spoken Word in Ghana, Ajeezay and Spoken Word. I had to research carefully and provide the right sources. The pictures are not mine and can be deleted for copyright if that is the infringement. But nobody has paid me for this edit. Heatrave (talk) 23:28, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be unable to actually answer direct questions. That's concerning. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:29, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae those pictures are not my own work. Heatrave (talk) 23:31, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So again, you repeatedly - to the tune of literally dozens of photos - uploaded items where you literally had to click to certify they were in fact your own work and you had permission, so why should anyone believe after your promotional editing and blatant lies about copyright, that you're suddenly telling the truth about everything else? Seems a stretch. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 23:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Kwame Boadu (1) (December 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Naraht was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Even if he had been part of the 40 under 40, that doesn't represent Notability for the purposes of Wikipedia.

Naraht (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rhymesonny moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rhymesonny, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:40, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elroy Salam (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elroy Salam and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:20, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fadda Dickson (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I went back and forth quite a bit here. On the one hand, the article subject has definitely made a name for himself and appears to be noteworthy. On the other hand, currently the list of awards is the longest section of this submission, and most of the references relate to the various awards the subject has received. I'm skeptical whether subjects would be considered notable solely based on having received a large number of awards (I can't find any specific guideline on it, but it raises some red flags). My recommendation would be to expand the other sections of the submission to describe the subject's career and life in more detail, in contexts other than the awards they have received, and provide sources that describe the subject in more detail (again, beyond just validating his acheivements

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fadda Dickson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 17:30, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Taking Out The Trash thank you for your feedback. I have expanded the career section to the best of the citations i could find. I want to leave it to the rest of the community to expand the article once approved. Heatrave (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fadda Dickson (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ratnahastin were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fadda Dickson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:44, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unorthodox Reviews (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by BuySomeApples were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Unorthodox Reviews and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 22:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rhymesonny has been accepted

Rhymesonny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cerebellum thank you for approving the article and I am excited to continue contributing to extend the scope of Wikipedia. Heatrave (talk) 03:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rhymesonny for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhymesonny is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhymesonny until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:04, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chijindu Kelechi Eke (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chijindu Kelechi Eke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamiebuba thank you for your response. Please help me understand how the references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article so i can fix it. Thanks for your feedback. Heatrave (talk) 10:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ga Traditional Council has been accepted

Ga Traditional Council, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 15:30, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chijindu Kelechi Eke (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely notable for US President Lifetime Achievement award; however Lifetime Achievement Award from the Nigerian-American Multicultural Center cites to a bare url. Better source is needed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chijindu Kelechi Eke and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 16:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @MicrobiologyMarcus thanks for your feedback. If notability has been established, don't you think it's best to accept the article and suggest a fix to the Url? Rather than reject the article solely because of the URL Heatrave (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Heatrave: Likely notable. Personally, I still had my doubts that it met notability, and then given the bare url for a reference, that tended towards a decline instead of approval. The rest of the sources on the article are okay for citing facts, but they are no more than passing mentions and don't contribute to SIGCOV. Happy to re-review if you can find coverage from a independent secondary and reliable source, that would assuage my notability concerns, feel free to ping me. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, § Film Awards will do it for notability. I've gone back and resubmitted for you and accepted. I didn't do any citation fixes for you, I've tagged the problem link. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@MicrobiologyMarcus thank you for your feedback. I will find a suitable url to fix that issue. Heatrave (talk) 18:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chijindu Kelechi Eke has been accepted

Chijindu Kelechi Eke, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:10, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samad Davis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Two Can Play That Game. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fadda Dickson has been accepted

Fadda Dickson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 23:24, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastern Railway Line, Ghana (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Could well be notable, but you need to give more than 1 sentence and more than 1 secondary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eastern Railway Line, Ghana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 14:58, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastern Railway Line, Ghana (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Trainsandotherthings was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

When someone tells you to expand the article, and you add exactly one sentence, do you really expect that to fix the problem?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eastern Railway Line, Ghana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

😄 @Trainsandotherthings i know right. So basically I have a writeup about this line as i know it very well. However, i cannot seem to find reliable third-party sources to back this information. I will do better. 😁 Heatrave (talk) 00:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ecowas Brown Card Insurance Scheme

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Ecowas Brown Card Insurance Scheme has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://browncardghana.com/ecowas-brown-card-scheme/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. DanCherek (talk) 23:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @DanCherek thank you for the clarification. In regards to this, it was quite difficult to explain in my own words. However i do understand the reasons for infringement. Can i recreate the page if i am able to come up with a a suitable write up for the article without infringing on copyright? Heatrave (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was deleted only for copyright reasons, so please feel free to recreate the article in your own words. I understand that it can be difficult sometimes! I sometimes find it helpful to read the source material first, then try to summarize it without directly referring to it (of course you can look at it afterwards, but this might help avoid the temptation of using the same or substantially similar phrasing). DanCherek (talk) 23:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DanCherek I have recreated the article so please kindly review. while at it, kindly review Samad Davis article for me as well. Thank you. Heatrave (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking (January 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Princess of Ara was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I've added the table to Patoranking. No need to resubmit.

Princess of Ara 12:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastern Railway Line, Ghana (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eastern Railway Line, Ghana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 04:32, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Sharon Dede Padi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sharon Dede Padi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jada Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jada Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jada Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Folf (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niphkeys (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't quite meet WP:NMUSICIAN with current sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niphkeys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 13:28, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne he is a record producer and not a musician Heatrave (talk) 13:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't quite meet WP:NPERSON then, either. Qcne (talk) 13:47, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne he is a record producer and has recording credits some of the biggest names in the nigerian music industry. He has received nominations in the producer category at multiple Nigerian music awards. He has not yet won any of his nominations but i think that should not discredit his works, which have won awards for the respective artistes. I am not a Nigerian but I started this and hopefully others can come and contribute. I think you should look at it from those lines, not necessary on the convincing coverage, because most of the creative people behind the camera do not receive as much spotlight as do the main characters. You can see this particularly in movies and music. Heatrave (talk) 13:54, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for ECOWAS

On 3 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article ECOWAS, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:09, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Heatrave. Thank you for your work on Akwaba (song). Bastun, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi Heatrave, nice work on your new article. It would benefit from being added to appropriate Wikiprojects, such as those dealing with African music and the Cup of Nations. Good job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 12:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Bastun}} thank you for your feedback. I was just about to add the Wikiprojects but wanted to work on ensuring that it is not an orphan. Thank you for your assistance. Heatrave (talk) 12:40, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2023 Africa Cup of Nations final

On 12 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Africa Cup of Nations final, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru (talk) 18:20, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Herbert Wigwe

On 13 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Herbert Wigwe, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 21:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why Steal My Article?

Hello Heatrave, i have come across your article titled Borteyman Sports Compkex, this article was first created by me on wednesday, 14th February and you stole it to publish it today. here is a link to my article showing i was the first to write about this User:Adansi11/sandbox . why did you do that? this is not fair enough Adansi11 (talk) 09:29, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Adansi11, initially I didn't want to respond but as this is an open space I have to set the record straight. Before I jump into that I will let me address a few things.

According to Wikipedia Friendly Space Policy, personal attacks must be avoided at all cost. In the event of a misunderstanding, you must first seek to enquire or start a discourse, rather than throw accusations around. You do not know who will be at the other end of the account you are attacking.
Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. The use of words like "steal" is a very strong word which without defence, can land both you and the person you are accusing in a lot of trouble.
No Editor has the right to make claim to an article. In the footer of every Wikipedia page, you see a creative commons shareAlike license, which renders all texts submitted to the platform to be binded by that copyright. So claiming that an article is yours is not correct to begin with because nobody owns an article on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Copyrights

With that said, information in your sandbox is private. Until an article is published into the article space, nothing stops another editor from starting the article. You cannot claim ownership to an article because you started writing about it first. The topic "Borteyman Sports Complex" has been in the news and has received a lot of coverage in the past few days, building up to the All African Games. I can understand your frustration, but I have not had access to your sandbox. Both of our articles are totally different and have no correlation whatsoever. It is just a mere coincidence that we happen to write about the same thing.

There will be a lot of opportunities to create your first article as a newbie but next time you have an issue, address the issue, do not attack the editor.

Happy editing

Heatrave (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davies Chirwa (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davies Chirwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 11:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohene Kwame Frimpong (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

SIGCOV not met.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ohene Kwame Frimpong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:56, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Boy moved to draftspace

The article is too promotional in tone to remain in mainspace, but could be re-published with a substantial rewrite. When you have finished rewriting the article, I would suggest submitting it to AfC, by clicking the "Finished drafting? Submit for review!" button. Mach61 (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten and submitted it. Mach61 (talk) 14:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Mach61 thank you. I haven't had the time to respond but thank you for your efforts 🙏Heatrave (talk) 14:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Kagney Linn Karter

On 24 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kagney Linn Karter, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 23:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eastern Railway Line, Ghana has been accepted

Eastern Railway Line, Ghana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Broc (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Touch It (Kidi song). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay thank you for bringing this to my knowledge. Heatrave (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Niphkeys (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Heatrave, you did good work here, but Niphkeys currently does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NMUSICIAN, it would be a waste of time for now as it might be taken to AfD if accepted and eventually deleted. He may pass NMUSICIAN if he receives SIGCOV in the future.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Niphkeys and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohene Kwame Frimpong (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ohene Kwame Frimpong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eric Edem Agbana for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Edem Agbana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Edem Agbana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Heatrave. Thank you for your work on Priority Insurance Company Limited. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

IMO and edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking as reviewed. To solidify, look for and include 1-2 sources that cover them IN DEPTH. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 21:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: I have included a source that talks about the subject into details which should satisfy conditions of notability. Is that enough to remove the notability tag on the article?Heatrave (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kings of Jo'burg (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tutwakhamoe was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kings of Jo'burg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:32, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kings of Jo'burg has been accepted

Kings of Jo'burg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 19:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohene Kwame Frimpong (March 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This does not pass WP:GNG. Sources like GhanaWeb, GhPage, Citinewsroom, Graphic Online, etc., are unreliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ohene Kwame Frimpong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:09, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces thank you for your feedback. However i do not agree on the conclusion that the listed references are not notable.

Citinewsroom: As far as journalism standards go, this is the most reliable news outlet in Ghana. Their news is researched and written by their journalists via radio, TV and online.
GhanaWeb: This is the biggest online platform in Ghana and to some extent Africa. It has been publishing news since 1999 and it is where majority go to read their news. (Website with the highest traffic)
Graphic Online: This is the online version of one of Ghana's national newspapers, Daily Graphic which has been printing and publishing Ghanaian news six days a week since 1950.
GhPage: You can make a case for GhPage which is a private blog and i will agree. However they have been cited by the big blogs when it comes to news around entertainment, showbiz and lifestyle.

These sources are the most reliable I could find whilst researching about the subject. To say these sources are not reliable infers that most articles about the Ghanaian space are not reliable as these platforms cover 99% of the news in Ghana. If you take these sources out, there are no serious alternatives for news in Ghana.

I will entreat you to reconsider your position on this matter. Thank you. Heatrave (talk) 17:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Heatrave, how are you doing today? You literally got this confused, notability isn't reliability, I wasn't disputing the notability of these publications, I was talking about how reliable they could be. You have, as a matter of fact, overrated Citinewsroom, a publication that you think "as far as journalism standards go", "is the most reliable news outlet in Ghana" would not publish a piece without a byline, that is against journalism standard. Pieces like this from Graphic Online are nothing but paid promotional puff pieces, also, the relationship to the Ghanaian government is a red flag. GhanaWeb and GhPage without stress and argument are unreliable publications, even though there are very many articles that are currently based on them.

Again, this is not about whether they are publications that "cover 99% of the news in Ghana" or how long they have existed (even though it sometimes matters), this is about how Wikipedia can rely on them based on WP:RS. We have plenty of publications that were established 5-10 years ago and they're ideal reliable publications. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces first of all thank you for your reply and feedback. I didn't mean to come off as aggressive so if my statement sounded that way, please forgive. Maybe i didn't understand the context of "GhanaWeb, Citinewsroom and Graphic are unreliable sources" as they are one of the major sources around.

That said, I do understand where you are coming from after following the the links you provided. As an editor, i have no control over the sources we find. In an ideal world, we wish and pray for sources written to meet these criteria, but that is not always possible.

Going forward, what would you suggest as the solution for this, as sources are very hard to come by. Heatrave (talk) 21:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Heatrave, I picked no offence at all. Indeed, it sucks that our most popular publications are not doing the right thing most of the times, and yes, we also do not have any control over them, so they keep doing what they do. ~~There's nothing we can do about it.~~ There's something we can do though, create content based on the few reliable sources we can find. I literally don't like depending on unreliable sources and will encourage other editors to do same. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces thanks for your feedback. Can you provide a general rule of thumb to help me determine if a source is reliable Heatrave (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This query is something that I have had in mind for months now, creating a page on my user subpage that will address questions like this. Journalism is, as a matter of fact, wide, and as such there are several rules of thumb for determining a reliable source. Also, it depends on context. I will try and brief you here based on my opinion, then maybe later, I will create that page.

For books, journals articles, etc. Books are mostly reliable, as long as they are not published by the subject of the article or by someone connected to the subject. Journal articles are also reliable if and only if they are published by a reliable Journal. There are several unreliable journals out there, but you'll mostly find reliable ones.

For Newspapers (Print/Online), Media organisations, Blogs, Aggregators, etc, it becomes more complex and requires vast understanding, especially in regions where sources from there are mostly unreliable. Generally, when you say "source", it actually refers to several bodies. For a newspaper, for example, it refers to the newspaper (which is what it mostly likely refers to by many Wikipedians), it could refer to the journalist who published that particular piece, it could also refer to the publisher of the newspaper, that is, the organisation that publishes/owns the paper.

Let's do some scenarios with this, let's say, a reliable journalist/writer publishes a piece in an unreliable newspaper that is owned by an unreliable publisher. An unreliable journalist publishes a piece in a reliable newspaper that is owned by a reliable publisher. Switch this as many times as you can think of, all these could affect the reliability of a piece/source.

Now, for a source to be reliable, it should follow journalism standard professionally, as well as in line with Wikipedia's policy on reliable source (WP:RS). Basically, whenever you are looking for sources, pay attention to whether the newspaper/website has editorial policies which governs how articles are published on the publication, pay attention to whether the source is a news producer or an aggregator, pay attention to whether the particular piece you're citing has a by-line (name of the authors/journalists/writers). Something common in African sources is that they refuse to label their advertorials as so, they mostly publish under no byline and some even do it under an actual journalist's name, it is important to watch out for promotional pieces, there are a lot of them nowadays, all published under no byline or under a journalist's name. Of course, we have some that do clearly state it, either via categorisation or authorship.

There are many things I would love to add but let me not clutter your talk page, lol.

I hope this helps, have a great day ahead. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces thank you for this thorough response. I have applied your feedback and rectified some of the issues raised. Going forward, I will refer back to this conversation regarding citations when drafting a new article. Thank you for your audience. Heatrave (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohene Kwame Frimpong (March 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ohene Kwame Frimpong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 06:53, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Golden Boy (KiDi album)

Hello, Heatrave,

Thank you for creating Golden Boy (KiDi album).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating. Kindly de-orphan.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:29, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davies Chirwa (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davies Chirwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ghana Railway Development Authority has been accepted

Ghana Railway Development Authority, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ghana Railway Development Authority

Hello, Heatrave,

Thank you for creating Ghana Railway Development Authority.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good start. Please categorise.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Naira Abuse moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Naira Abuse. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Eugene Moyan Beladan

Hello, Heatrave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eugene Moyan Beladan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Samuel Kwame Boadu

Hello, Heatrave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samuel Kwame Boadu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devarishi Dasa Asamoah for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devarishi Dasa Asamoah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devarishi Dasa Asamoah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GSS ^💬 15:11, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samad Davis (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

I hate to decline this draft for now, but I feel like the coverage of this person is too shaky. It mostly comprises of short articles that just mentions he directed/produced x movie. Perhaps you could find articles talking about his life in general or his filming style.

He has been involved in a lot of films and won a decent amount of awards, so I think you can find more in-depth sources about Davis. I don't think Davis passes the bar of WP:NCREATIVE yet, but I am not familiar with Ghanaian film industry.

Also, is the term entrepreneur appropriate? None of the sources say he is one, and he does not run any businesses.

All in all, good luck and feel free to ask questions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Samad Davis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 15:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ca thank you for your feedback. I will agree that most of the sources used may qualify as passing mentions. However, like I have observed when writing for the people behind the scenes, it is difficult to find secondary sources that goes into the depth when it comes to the person unless they win an individual award. There is a lot of coverage however of the work they have done and the achievements those works have gone on to chalk. And this was my approach to the article. I wrote the article to focus on his work and the impact of that work and left room for his personal life when I find it.

I also realised that a huge aspect of his filmography already have Wikipedia articles which i believe is a good thing and should help his case.

Davies' work in Ghana was mostly as a music video director so again in my writing, i focused on his work which was highly impactful.

The only reference i found that went in depth about his personal life was an interview found on YouTube and i don't know if that qualifies as a secondary source. Heatrave (talk) 18:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of Akra (film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Queen of Akra (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 17:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davies Chirwa (May 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davies Chirwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 05:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Afronita moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Afronita. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 01:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking

Hello, Heatrave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Awards and Nominations Received by Patoranking, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:05, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samad Davis has been accepted

Samad Davis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ibjaja055 (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cinema of Burundi (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Youknowwhoistheman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cinema of Burundi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Youknow? (talk) 08:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Nsoatreman FC

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nsoatreman FC. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Nsoatreman F.C.. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Nsoatreman F.C.. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Telfordbuck (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afronita (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Afronita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:04, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Queen of Akra (film) (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Queen of Akra (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 02:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Transmission-Based Train Control has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Transmission-Based Train Control. Thanks! C F A 💬 22:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CFA Yes CBTC is a type of TBTC Heatrave (talk) 22:13, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accepted. Thanks. C F A 💬 22:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Transmission-Based Train Control has been accepted

Transmission-Based Train Control, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

C F A 💬 22:22, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Maison Yusif

Hello, Heatrave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Maison Yusif, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Queen of Akra (film) (August 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:NFILM based on references provided (mostly routine coverage). Reviews by reliable sources would be helpful.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Queen of Akra (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 02:35, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CFA The references contain a review and the film is notable per Wikipedia standards Heatrave (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, where are the receptions? Are they from reliable sources? If they are, please put them in the article and reception. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ohene Kwame Frimpong (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coupled with the poor sources I mentioned earlier, an article for Frimpong is currently WP:TOOSOON. But have it in mind that this is a promising draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ohene Kwame Frimpong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces I agree that the sources are not helpful, but his impact in his local community cannot be underplayed. The sources can do better on several points, but should that take away from his philanthropic impact of building very basic infrastructure like schools and clinics to benefit the people of his community? Heatrave (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the point. There are countless African philanthropist, I’m probably one of them. But we’re looking are sources that do not give these subjects WP:ROUTINE about their philanthropic works but coverages that delve into them as a person, not promotional of course. This is what the point is and the sources currently are not from this perspective. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanderwaalforces What Is the way forward from here? Heatrave (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TOOSOON implies a wait. A wait for better sources to emerge. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davies Chirwa (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ktkvtsh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Davies Chirwa's article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. Most references only mention him briefly, and Source 7 is a dead link, making it difficult to verify key claims. Therefore, the subject does not meet the notability threshold.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Davies Chirwa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dynasty (Miia song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dynasty (Miia song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynasty (Miia song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:58, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Rich Homie Quan

On 8 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Rich Homie Quan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 02:48, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Maison Yusif

Hello, Heatrave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Maison Yusif".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:34, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Naira Abuse

Hello, Heatrave. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Naira Abuse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stop Galamsey Now Protest

The article Stop Galamsey Now Protest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 02:59, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku the protest is ongoing with some arrests and is a very notable event happening in Ghana right now. It is still unfolding so there has to be some fact checking and time to continue the article but it is notable. Unless there's another notability yardstick I am unaware of.

You also haven't given any reason why you think it's not notable Heatrave (talk) 03:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Heatrave, the article says the protest ended on the 23rd, so as far as I can tell, it's a three-day protest where nothing of note seems to have happened. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:12, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku There have been several arrests and cases of police brutality that have been ongoing yesterday and Tuesday. You don't have all the details so it's a bit premature to propose it for deletion because you think it's a 3 day event and so it has ended. That's not how protests work. Heatrave (talk) 03:16, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Heatrave, my prod is based on the content of the article. I don't "think" it's a 3-day event—the page says so. If you have an issue with this, please take it up on the appropriate talk page. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Revirvlkodlaku I don't have any issues. All I'm saying is that the delete proposal is premature. We need events to unfold and be duly verified before we proceed to update. Heatrave (talk) 03:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Queen of Akra (film) (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Heatrave, I think we should wait a little more for things like critics or/and watchers to actually do reviews on this film. Still fails WP:NFILM for now.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Queen of Akra (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:47, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stop Galamsey Now Protest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stop Galamsey Now Protest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stop Galamsey Now Protest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 13:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Apps newsletter – Third quarter of 2024

Hello,

The latest Wikimedia Apps newsletter is ready for early translation: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Apps/Newsletter/Third_quarter_of_2024

Direct translation link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Translate&group=page-Wikimedia+Apps%2FNewsletter%2FThird+quarter+of+2024&action=page&filter=&action_source=translate_page&language=

We plan to send the newsletter on Monday at 9:00 am (UTC).

We appreciate your dedicated effort and the time you took to translate this newsletter! If you have any questions, please let me know.

Respectfully,

Amal Ramadan

--09:03, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Naira Abuse

Hello, Heatrave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Naira Abuse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parliament of Ghana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Democratic Congress.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Afronita (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement after previous decline. Coming third in a competition doesn't justify notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Afronita and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 18:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eugene Moyan Beladan

Hello, Heatrave. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Eugene Moyan Beladan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:03, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]