User talk:Jannatulbaqi

SCAM WARNING!
If someone contacts you asking for money to get a draft published, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article—do not trust them! These offers are scams. Report them to paid-en-wpwikipedia.org. more information...

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8	Archive 9
Archive 10	Archive 11	Archive 12

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Dorothy Kerin

Thank you for reviewing my page on the life of Kerin. You noted that "This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling." I would be interested to have a few examples from you, please, of where you think the page need attention. Thank you, and Happy New Year Jgdc47B (talk) 14:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

non WP:RS reference

On the Mark Joseph Stern You deleted one of the refs as non WP:RS reference. The full ref is:

^[1]

This refers to a site at UC Irvine School of Law. I do not understand why that site is considered WP:RS

Also deleted was the ref:

^[2]

This is from the University of Richmond Law Review. Why is that site considered WP:RS?

--Toploftical (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC) Toploftical (talk) 19:12, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Supreme Court Term in Review Panelist: Mark Joseph Stern, University of California, Irvine School of Law, Jul 6, 2022
^ Advancing an Adaptive Standard of Strict Scrutiny for Content-Based Commercial Speech Regulation by Nat Stern and Mark Stern, University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 47, 2012, Oct 5, 2012

Women in Red February 2025

Women in Red | February 2025, Vol 11, Issue 2, Nos. 326, 327, 330, 331

Online events:

New: Black women | Alphabet run C & D
Continuing, year-long initiatives: #1day1woman | Music

Announcements from other communities:

Wiki Loves Ramadan begins on 25 February - a great opportunity to focus on women from Islamic history

Tip of the month:

Looking for an image? Sometimes you can find openly licensed ones on Creative Commons search

Suggestion:

Consider helping to promote women under In the news and On this day on Wikipedia's main page

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project.
Follow us on social media:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:54, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wikipedia articles versus Wikipedia pages

Hi @Jannatulbaqi: How goes it. When your refer to the main Wikipedia component, can you refer to them as articles, not pages. Pages are what social media call them but they are not that. They are articles and that is what they are called on Wikipedia. Wikipedia isn't a book. Please refer to them as such. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 08:48, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Scope creep: Yeah, that happened by mistake. I will be more careful in the future. Thank you! Cheers Baqi:) (talk) 10:00, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hemlata Mahishwar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hemlata Mahishwar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemlata Mahishwar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.