User talk:Sweetabena

This is Sweetabena's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Please click here to add a new message!

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kwame Asare Obeng, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate the notice regarding the disambiguation link pointing to Independent.Sweetabena (talk) 04:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesing new article

hi Sweetabena I hope this message finds you? I'm here to request new article for RG Qluck Wise and please I need you to create this article for me.

Best regards, Wise 154.161.14.87 (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wise,

Thank you for reaching out! I noticed that the article about "RG Qluck Wise" has already been created on the French Wikipedia. I attempted to translate it into English using the beta translation tool, but unfortunately, the page is currently protected, which prevented me from making the necessary edits.

It might be helpful for you to check with the French Wikipedia community to understand why the page is protected. Once the protection is lifted or further clarification is provided, I'll be happy to assist with the translation.

Feel free to keep me updated on any developments, and I'll be glad to help once the issue is resolved!

Best regards,Sweetabena (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kojo Yankson (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Josedimaria were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kojo Yankson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jõsé^hola 08:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my submission, Draft:Kojo Yankson. I understand the concerns regarding the lack of significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. I will work on gathering additional references that meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines and revise the draft accordingly.

If you have any specific suggestions or examples of the type of sources needed, I would appreciate the guidance. Thank you for your time and feedback.

Best regards Sweetabena (talk) 08:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sweetabena! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jõsé^hola 08:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and guidance. I’ll visit the Articles for Creation help desk and the Teahouse for support in improving my draft. I appreciate the resources and assistance offered to editors like me.

Best regards, Sweetabena (talk) 08:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stanley Dissanaike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sri Lankan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will review the link and ensure it points to the correct article.Sweetabena (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Afua Asantewaa

Hi. I've moved this article to draft space because even the early versions are written in a promotional tone. Other editors have made it far worse since then. Please could you work on it in draft to remove the promotional content and then submit for review. Deb (talk) 10:14, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message and for your efforts in reviewing the article. I understand your concerns about the tone, but I respectfully believe that the article Afua Assntewaa should not have been moved to draft space.

I have worked hard to ensure the article reflects notable achievements in a factual and neutral manner, and I believe it meets the basic criteria for a Wikipedia article. While I acknowledge that some early versions may have been edited with more promotional language, I have made revisions and would be happy to work further to address any issues that may remain.

Rather than moving the article to draft space, I would appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with you and other editors to refine the article directly in the main space. I am open to suggestions on how we can remove any remaining promotional content while still ensuring the article remains informative and neutral.

Please let me know if you are open to working together to improve the article. I value constructive feedback and am committed to making sure the content adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines.Sweetabena (talk) 10:40, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]