User:Nobletripe/Dashboard
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nobletripe/Dashboard. |
Status: Online 
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- Deandhamas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:10, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2603:6011:ff0:1c20:21d2:21ef:af48:3cfa (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Maruf Hasan 6528 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 61 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user removing references, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- 125.195.47.57 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Kalindu2001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Tar: actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. This is a slow edit warring account. Account was set up in October 2024, has only edited Tarshish. Repeatedly replaces article text, does not engage on talk pages despite attempts to bring them into conversation[1]. Many template warnings were given, recently a 4i warning[2] was given. Oblivy (talk) 12:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Arrmoofficial (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) 3 changes to Music therapy adding in their telegram link in the article and revising infobox description with their name. Sophia(∠θ pr′me) 13:16, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently.
- KUDAMALOOR FLUTE ACADEMY (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Kudamaloor Janardanan (diff): actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Removing content from page without explanation ;User account not seems to meet from WP:UPOL. --- Bhairava7 • (@píng mє-tαlk mє) 13:35, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Arrmoofficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Livesinaworldofimagination (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Managementfirestone (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Https://www.firestonemanagementgroup.com. Theroadislong (talk) 09:03, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Inventel.tvwiki (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:CORPNAME, promotional userpage. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – For months, incorrect edits have been made on page, to which I have reverted and updated properly. I have warned user each time, however the IP address changes slightly each time. This is highly disruptive as it means currently reverting approximately edits each week and then having to re-edit. These details can be found on history page. I am also requesting this protection for each Coventry City player for the near future. Telfordbuck (talk) 18:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- for a week. Daniel Case (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also, pages aren't protected preemptively. Are you referring to the right page, there haven't been any edits to this article since October? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi Protection: Persistent vandalism and hate speech from IP users regarding recent real life issues in talk section. CricketXP (talk) 03:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 03:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Lectonar (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite Semi Protection: Persistent vandalism from IP users regarding box office collection, daily ip users disrputive editing on article .
- Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. Lectonar (talk) 08:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Block evasion by User:Bigboss19923, same overemphasis on a murder case as led to the previous protection. Belbury (talk) 10:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP user won't stop vandalizing the article. Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 11:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. Lectonar (talk) 11:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – I would like to request long-term protection (~1 year or more) because of UPE/sock activity from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BobVillars. Pinging Izno. Janhrach (talk) 11:53, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Please also protect Institut Sup'Biotech de Paris, for the same reason. Janhrach (talk) 11:58, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Pending-changes protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 12:04, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP vandalism after his recent death. Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 12:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined I think this is moot now with his death being reliably sourced. Lectonar (talk) 13:20, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Some editors have been prematurely editing in that Trudeau is about to resign. To date, the prime minister hasn't made such an annoucement. GoodDay (talk) 12:51, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Request for "extended confirmed protection" for atleast a year. Continuous vandalism everyday by a sockpuppet from months. Hbanm (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: someone try to change the name of Ddnar 49.237.23.126 (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Somone try comiing and chage the name
49.237.23.126 (talk) 14:00, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Ip vandalism changing boxoffice figure, been happening for last 2 days. Please protect page. RangersRus (talk) 14:09, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Genocide Watch states that: „A genocide of the Palestinian people by Israel is underway in Gaza. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister General Yoav Gallant have demonstrated their intent to destroy a substantial portion of the civilian population of Gaza. Israel is committing war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide in Gaza. It is also committing crimes against humanity against Palestinians in the West Bank.” See https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/genocide-emergency-gaza-and-the-west-bank-2024 This information should be added to first paragraph of Gaza_genocide#NGOs_and_intergovernmental_organisations Jakub Onderka (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 07:18, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 11 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:56, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Hi, I would like to request this right because I have met the criteria for 25 articles that are free of problems. I would like to use it for my interest in WikiProject Korea. You can see all of articles i've created here! :) Aidillia(talk) 07:08, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Primarily grammar and typo editing Evolt (talk) 18:30, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
I plan to replace the publisher (in Chinese) in some of the book sources with the corresponding English articles. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 12:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reduce amount of manual work in updating links (including, in this case, Superia to Superia (comics)) Ubcule (talk) 19:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
I'm requesting that RickRolled7676 be made confirmed. They are attempting to make productive edits, but they are running into an abuse filter, and being added to this group would help. See also Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Reports#RickRolled7676. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, dear adminstrators! I did not contribute Wikipedia that much yet. But I can promise something. I'm turkmen and turkmen Wikipedia is not that much rich yet. And I want to add more articles and improve the ones that has been already created already as much as I can. Thanks for reading this. Hudaýberenow (talk) 17:41, 5 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 600 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Foucault pendulum, Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter. My recent edits also contributed significantly to upgrading the article History of the Jews in Tunisia from "Start-Class" to "B-Class." Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
@OhNoItsJamie removed my access to EC because i made a quite a few test edits and said if i made 100 constructive edits, i would gain it back, and so im asking for it, if not its fine i guess
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Hello! A few weeks ago my extended-confirmed protection was removed for breaking WP:PGAME, I sincerely apologize for this, I was impatient and I had no knowledge of the rules existence at the time. I’ve done ~50-80 dummy edits on my sandbox, and have done over 500 cheat-free edits since. Zabezt (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for file mover |
|---|
File mover[edit]
Hello, I primarily work with files on Wikimedia Commons, where I have file mover and autopatrol rights. The process of file moving on English Wikipedia is almost the same as the practices on Commons. I also have experience working on files on English Wikipedia, including submitting several rename requests. Moreover, I have file mover rights on Bengali Wikipedia, further demonstrating my familiarity with file management across Wikimedia projects. I am familiar with Wikipedia:File names and request this right to enhance my work. Thanks.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 05:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC) |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I would like to help out with the January NPP drive, as I've participated in the other recent drives. I believe I meet the criteria for the NPR right after reviewing them. Thanks! — voidxor 21:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
I have been an AFC reviewer since March 2024 and am currently on probation. I want this flag to clear the backlog drive for next month (January 2025). Kindly read User_talk:Sohom_Datta#NPR_request for my previous decline cause conversation. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 15:29, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
So I can participate in the News Page Patrol January backlog drive. I have participated in a New Page Patrol drive before, and wish to help again. :) Mason7512 (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to help out with the NPP backlog drive. I believe I fit all the minimum guidelines; I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia's guidelines and policies and sufficient experience with quality control processes, as I engage with the deletion process, especially PROD and CSD, whenever possible and I help out WikiProjects by writing new articles. I try my best to communicate in a civil manner with editors in communication. In the scenario I get approved for this, I strive to review pages and reduce the backlog strictly on a volunteer basis, to contribute greatly to Wikipedia by reviewing pages with this duty. MimirIsSmart (talk) 09:36, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is a massive backlog which I would love to help out in! Yeshivish613 (talk) 18:53, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I was previously a reviewer, hopeful to return now after illness. I'd like to get back into it, and already into the working again in AFC/vandalism. thanks! Snowycats (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I would very much like to remain a New Page Patroller, please, and to have the three-month period extended indefinitely. I greatly enjoy this aspect of being a Wikipedia editor, and believe that I have made a very positive contribution. In the three months since my NPP rights were last discussed, I have marked as reviewed several hundred pages, some of which I had to edit quite a bit to get them into appropriate shape and others which were created so well that they were really good without me having to do much or anything. I have of course reflected a lot on how best to go about this important task, and to minimize my errors and weak judgements. I am far more cautious than before, and consequently I have actually marked as reviewed far fewer pages per week than I did before. Indeed, when patrolling new pages, I often edit pages for hours each day without marking any at all as reviewed. I am demanding a higher standard in my own mind than hitherto. This does not mean that I have not made mistakes over the last few months. I am human and have made errors. I do not believe there have been many, however, and I consider my efforts to be reliable and trustworthy, but I am disappointed in myself for making any mistakes at all. The key here is that I try hard always to learn from them and not to repeat them. I am neither proud nor disputatious, and I try to treat all fellow editors with respect and pleasantness if they highlight any issue, and I do try to absorb and begin using any and all guidance that I receive. I respectfully ask my fellow editors to see that any errors over the last three months have been very few, and that by percentage of the pages I have edited or marked as reviewed, the errors are a tiny percent, thus establishing me as dependable and trustworthy. I have gratefully received several barnstars for my patrolling throughout this period. I repeat that I regret getting anything wrong at all and aim for zero errors. I am committed to this standard. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 10:44, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
Managing the NPP backlog is something I've been doing for some time in terms of monitoring video game pages as part of WP:VG. I've been pretty extensively involved in managing drafts, particularly flagging and identifying drafts that do not meet WP:GNG or other reasons, and taking WP:DRAFTIFY, WP:PROD or WP:AFD actions for recently created articles that do not meet WP:GNG. I think the track record with WP:AFD is pretty solid even if it leans to deletionism a little. I've just realised I could be doing something more constructive and marking reviewed pages as well. Believe there was a one-month trial run I did in 2024. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I’d like to request temporary NPP rights to participate in the January NPP drive. I have two years of editing experience and meet the criteria. Thank you! Gauravs 51 (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I fit the basic criteria and I think I could make a contribution here. I have a fairly good idea of my limitations and will deal with them by passing on the more difficult new page decisions. I may trouble more experienced editors for guidance from time to time while I get up to speed but I'll be as self contained as possible. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I want to help with the backlog, as well as an overall desire to help contribute to Wikipedia in any way I can. I meet the edit number and account age requirements, and I have created about 20-25 articles (only two of which were deleted). RedactedHumanoid (talk) 02:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights: I would like to help with the NPP work. Aqurs1 (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I request Pending Changes Reviewer rights to assist in reviewing edits. I have experience with editing and want to help maintain the quality of articles. Gwanki (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Recently, i've been reverting vandalism and disruptive edits on Wikipedia with Twinkle and Ultraviolet, and as an extended-confirmed user, I have over 850 edits. I also revert good faith edits, and if I get this request accepted I will be able to reject vandalism put on pending changes (on pending changes). 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 22:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Requesting Pending Changes reviewer permission - I am active editor for quite some time now and recently saw an alert for January New Page patrol backlog drive. I want to contribute to that, but thought I can start with Pending change reviewer first. I have a good understanding of wiki policies, and am continuing to familiarize myself with them. I have also read Wikipedia:Reviewing_pending_changes#Criteria_to_receive_this_permission and understand expectations for both gaining the rights and performing the pending changes. Asteramellus (talk) 12:24, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi. I've been editing wikipedia semi-actively when real life allows for almost 3 years and recently surpassed 1000 edits. I have fully read and understood everything linked at WP:PCCRITERIA. The main reason I think I am suited to having pending changes reviewer rights is because of my current project to clean up the backlog at CAT:ESP, CAT:EEP and in the future CAT:COIREQ. The work between those and proposed changed reviewing is very similar and would allow me to help there as well. Ultraodan (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
I was granted right for 60 days now I would like to renew it. Mithilanchalputra(Talk) 08:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Have been a part of Wikipedia for a while now, usually contributing with proofreading, rewriting for clarity, updating data, removing inaccurate data, etc. With most of my contributions being of an editing nature (rather than creating something new), I think that being able to approve pending edits from others would allow me to contribute more. ArtistPrime (talk) 15:59, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
I am aware the Reviewing process for Pending Changes. I might help to reduce load. Good Faith. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:48, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
As someone who frequently edits and creates U.S. state legislature pages and living biographies, I strongly believe that receiving this permission will allow me to help combat vandalism, especially as the wikis of living people are often vandalized. I am 100% aware of being able to revert vandalized edits -- however, some edits are genuine, and I would love to help out in that domain of expertise. WormEater13 (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
I had "pending change" privileges, but for some reason they are gone. I think I had to request to renew them but I did not realize. I apologize. I have been focused on doing other things on Wikipedia, such as cleaning up article categorization, but I would like to start using the "pending review" privilege if possible. I make daily edits to all types of Wikipedia pages and am familiar with the style guide. My ideas for things aren't always popular but I respect when conversations happen that challenge my edits because that's how Wikipedia becomes a better place. I always assume good faith, but I also understand that not everyone possesses that. Thank you. BittersweetParadox (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
I edit mostly in academic philosophy and closely adjacent areas. Twinkle is adequate for the vandalism that I encounter in articles on my watchlist. I read Wikipedia more broadly, however, and might be more active in assisting with general anti-vandalism efforts with the help of tools such as Huggle that make this easier to do, but which require rollback privileges to use (this would be the case especially if any of them make it easier to do in a responsible way on a tablet, rather than at the desktop I use for regular editing). I've been bitten as a newbie, and am alert lest I do this to anyone else. Wikipedia's coverage of the humanities is, to put it generously, uneven. On the few occasions I've encountered someone new with obvious subject-matter expertise who is making problematic, but good-faith edits, I have made a deliberate effort to welcome them, offer information, and protect them from more aggressive defenders of guidelines and policies (who might turn them off Wikipedia before they even have a chance to learn the basics, which are in some ways quite at odds with academic norms). This is just to say that I will, of course, use manual reverts with edit descriptions and talk pages, rather than rollback or anything requiring it, except in cases of blatant vandalism or persistent abuse by editors who disregard clear and polite notices of issues with their edits. Thank you for your consideration, Patrick (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier. Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |