Jump to content

User talk:Bakhtar40

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! Bakhtar40, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Smartkas[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bakhtar40. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Smartkas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:50, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Sajjan Jindal, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. As per the Wiki etiquettes', I am letting you know why I removed the "Rape allegation" text from Sajjan Jindal's page. I did so in line with WP:BLPCRIME because Sajjan Jindal is not directly a public figure, falling under the "Eminence, but Low-Profile" subsection. According to this guideline, editors should be cautious about including material that implies someone has committed a crime unless there's a conviction. If you wish to put forward your opinion about your edit, then I invite you to discuss this at article's talk page. Mmccaea (talk) 09:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are removing well cited info. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems you are intentionally avoiding reading and understanding WP:BLPCRIME. I kindly ask you once more to review it, engage in discussion on the article's talk page, and then proceed accordingly. Mmccaea (talk) 11:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Sajjan Jindal, may be confused with vandalism. Please confirm that you have received and comprehended the previous message regarding your recent edits at Sajjan Jindal. We would greatly appreciate your participation and input on the article's talk page. Mmccaea (talk) 11:46, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bakhtar40 WP:3RR could have gotten both of us blocked. Though our friendship began on the wrong foot, let us stay in touch and support each other in our wiki edits. Thank you once again. Mmccaea (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sure Mmccaea, we are friends now. Today, i have leant a great lesson from this edit warring. I will be in touch and looking forward to help each other. Bakhtar40 (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm AgisdeSparte. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shovana Narayan, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AgisdeSparte (talk) 11:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be so impatient to revert edits on Wikipedia. Give time to contributors to complete their task. I just un-do your edits following the addition of reliable references. Bakhtar40 (talk) 11:34, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CK Birla Group Changes[edit]

Hi Bakhtar40, I have noticed the changes in the article CK Birla Group were incorrect. The owner's name was inaccurate and then it was semi-locked. By checking the references and the historical details, I have corrected them. (Old version) -- VKG1985 (Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 17:45, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lanka Tiles[edit]

You edits appear unconstructive. Please read WP:LEAD for a start. Chanaka L (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, this is constructive. The paragraph i removed either promotional or already covered in history. Bakhtar40 (talk) 06:49, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:LEAD, Duplicating info containing body in lead section is the point of lead section. Chanaka L (talk) 06:51, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss, major changes before making them, including removing cited info Chanaka L (talk) 06:52, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is the page created by you and it promotes the subject somewhere. You are adding promotional content. And the introduction para is absolutely not in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Bakhtar40 (talk) 06:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is true that I created the page. I am afraid I disagree with you saying I added promotional content. Lanka Tiles is one of the most valuable brands in Sri Lanka. It is fact, nothing promotional there. Please refer [1]. Chanaka L (talk) 06:59, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not agree with you. You are adding puffery and peacock words backed with not reliable references. Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you say what exactly are the puffery and peacock words, I am willing to discuss and remove them. Chanaka L (talk) 07:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have a List of most valuable brands BTW. Chanaka L (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024[edit]

Information icon Hi Bakhtar40! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Cremastra (talk) 07:39, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cremastra, I appreciate the notification. I apologize for using Tehouse instead of Dispute Resolution Center for the discussion posting. Bakhtar40 (talk) 07:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]