Gaza genocide

This article is about accusations against Israel during the Israel–Hamas war. For earlier accusations, see Palestinian genocide accusation. For allegations against Hamas, see Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel.

Gaza genocide
Part of the Israel–Hamas war and Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territories
Palestinians with body bags, Gaza Strip, October 2023
Location	Gaza Strip
Date	7 October 2023 (2023-10-07) – present
Target	Palestinians
Attack type	Genocide, collective punishment, mass murder, ethnic cleansing, forced displacement, bombardment, targeted killings, starvation as method of war, torture, rape
Deaths	At least 42,718 killed Estimated 62,000 dead from starvation At least 5,000 dead from lack of access to care for chronic diseases More than 10,000 estimated under rubble Indirect deaths likely to be several times higher than those killed by violence
Injured	At least 100,282
Victims	Damaging or destruction of approximately 80% of homes and 50% of buildings in Gaza 20% of population facing "catastrophic levels of acute food insecurity" involving "an extreme lack of food, starvation, and exhaustion" 1,900,000+ internally displaced persons
Motive	Retaliation and revenge for the 7 October attacks Zionism Anti-Palestinianism, anti-Arab racism Settler colonialism
Accused	Israel Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli war cabinet and government Israel Defense Forces, under the leadership of Israel Katz and Yoav Gallant Israel Ministry of National Security, under the leadership of Itamar Ben-Gvir Complicity United States, under the Biden administration United Kingdom, under the Sunak and Starmer ministries Germany, under the Scholz cabinet Australia, under the Albanese government
Litigation	South Africa's genocide case against Israel

Experts, governments, United Nations agencies, and non-governmental organisations have accused Israel of carrying out a genocide against the Palestinian people during its invasion and bombing of the Gaza Strip in the ongoing Israel–Hamas war. Various observers, including the UN Special Committee to investigate Israeli practices and Francesca Albanese (the United Nations Special Rapporteur), have cited statements by senior Israeli officials that may indicate an "intent to destroy" (in whole or in part) Gaza's population, a necessary condition for the legal threshold of genocide to be met. A majority of mostly US-based Middle East scholars believe Israel's actions in Gaza were intended to make it uninhabitable for Palestinians, and 75% of them say Israel's actions in Gaza constitute either genocide or "major war crimes akin to genocide".

In June 2024, the UN Human Rights Office condemned the reported killing of 500 health workers. As of August 2024, only 17 of Gaza's 36 hospitals were partially functional; 84% of health centers in the region have been destroyed or suffered damage. An enforced Israeli blockade heavily contributed to starvation and the threat of famine in the Gaza Strip, while Israeli forces prevented humanitarian supplies from reaching the Palestinian population, blocking or attacking humanitarian convoys. Early in the conflict, Israel cut off water and electricity supply from the Gaza Strip. Israel has also destroyed numerous culturally significant buildings, including 13 libraries, all of Gaza's 12 universities and 80% of its schools, dozens of mosques, three churches, and two museums. By mid-August 2024, after nine months of attacks, Israeli military action had resulted in over 40,000 confirmed Palestinian deaths—1 out of every 59 people in Gaza—averaging 148 deaths per day. Most of the victims are civilians, of whom at least 50% are women and children, and more than 100 journalists. Thousands more dead bodies are thought to be under the rubble of destroyed buildings.

The government of South Africa has instituted proceedings, South Africa v. Israel, against Israel at the International Court of Justice (ICJ), alleging a violation of the Genocide Convention. In an initial ruling, the ICJ held that South Africa was entitled to bring its case against Israel, while Palestinians were recognised to have "a plausible right to be protected from genocide" that faced a real risk of irreparable damage. The court ordered Israel to observe its obligations under the Genocide Convention by taking all measures within its power to prevent the commission of acts of genocide, to prevent and punish incitement to genocide, and to allow basic humanitarian services into Gaza. The court also later ordered Israel to increase humanitarian aid into Gaza and to prevent genocidal acts during the Rafah offensive. The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Israel's supporters say that accusing Israel of genocide is antisemitic, but others argue that this is a weaponization of antisemitism, intended to shield Israel from such allegations.

Background

See also: Israeli apartheid and Blockade of the Gaza Strip

The 1948 Palestine war saw the establishment of Israel in most of what had been Mandatory Palestine, with the exception of two separated territories that became known as the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, held by Jordan and Egypt respectively. Following the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel occupied the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The subsequent period witnessed two popular uprisings by Palestinians against the Israeli occupation; the First and Second Intifadas, in 1987 and 2000. The latter ended with Israel's unilateral withdrawal from Gaza in 2005.

Since 2007, the Gaza Strip has been governed by Hamas, an Islamist militant group, while the West Bank remained under the control of the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority. After Hamas took over, Israel imposed a blockade of the Gaza Strip that significantly damaged its economy. Israel justified the blockade by citing security concerns, but international rights groups have called the blockade a form of collective punishment. UNRWA reported that, due to the blockade, 81% of Gazans were living below the poverty level in 2023, with 63% food insecure and dependent on international assistance.

Since 2007, Israel and Hamas, along with other Palestinian militant groups based in Gaza, have engaged in conflict, including four wars in 2008–2009, 2012, 2014, and 2021. These conflicts killed approximately 6,400 Palestinians and 300 Israelis. In 2018–2019, there were large weekly organized protests near the Gaza-Israel border, which were violently suppressed by Israel, whose snipers killed hundreds and injured thousands of Palestinians. Soon after the 2021 Israel–Palestine crisis began, Hamas's military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades, started planning the 7 October 2023 operation against Israel. According to diplomats, Hamas had repeatedly said in the months preceding October 2023 that it did not want another military escalation in Gaza as it would worsen the humanitarian crisis that occurred after the 2021 conflict.

On 7 October 2023, Hamas led an attack into Israel from Gaza, resulting in at least 1,139 deaths, most of them civilians. Israel responded with a highly destructive bombing campaign followed by an invasion of the Gaza Strip on 27 October. Some scholars argued that there was genocide against Palestinians before the 7 October attacks, but the Israeli military campaign in Gaza has been characterized as genocidal by South Africa and other supporters of the genocide argument.

Hamas officials said that the attack was a response to the Israeli occupation, the blockade of the Gaza Strip, Israeli settler violence against Palestinians, restrictions on the movement of Palestinians, and the imprisonment of thousands of Palestinians, whom Hamas sought to release by taking Israeli hostages. Numerous commentators have identified the broader context of Israeli occupation as a cause of the war. The Associated Press wrote that Palestinians are "in despair over a never-ending occupation in the West Bank and suffocating blockade of Gaza". Several human rights organizations, including Amnesty International, B'Tselem, and Human Rights Watch have likened the Israeli occupation to apartheid; Israel's supporters dispute this characterization. An advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice published in July 2024 affirmed the occupation as illegal and said it violated Article 3 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which prohibits racial segregation and apartheid.

Aftermath of bombing in Gaza City in December 2023

Legal definition of genocide

The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group". The acts in question include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Genocide is a crime of special intent (dolus specialis); it is carried out deliberately, with victims targeted based on real or perceived membership in a protected group. The genocides recognised under the 1948 legal definition that led to trials in international criminal tribunals are the Cambodian genocide, the Rwandan genocide, and the Srebrenica massacre.

Other definitions of genocide

Main article: Genocide definitions

Raphael Lemkin's original definition of genocide was broader than that later adopted by the United Nations; he focused on genocide as the "destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups", including actions that led to the "disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups". Scholarly definitions vary, but there are three common themes: "the violence or other action taken should be deliberate, organized, sustained, and large-scale", atrocities are selective for a distinguishable group, and "the perpetrator takes steps to prevent the group from surviving or reproducing in a given territory". The colloquial understanding of genocide is heavily influenced by the Holocaust as its archetype and is conceived as innocent victims targeted for their ethnic identity rather than for any political reason. Genocide is often considered the apex of criminality, worse than other atrocities that lead to an equal amount of civilian death and destruction.

Alleged genocidal actions

See also: War crimes in the Israel–Hamas war § By Israel, Gaza humanitarian crisis (2023–present), and Gaza Strip famine

Ambulance operated by the Palestine Red Crescent Society in Khan Younis, Gaza Strip, after it was heavily damaged by an Israeli military airstrike

Direct killings

During the first two months of bombing, Israel dropped 25,000 tonnes of explosives on the Gaza Strip. Many of these were unguided "dumb bombs" dropped in densely populated areas, and obliterated entire neighborhoods.

Since 7 October 2023, the IDF has been accused of extrajudicial killing of unarmed Palestinian detainees, doctors, and healthcare workers. Israeli soldiers have summarily executed Palestinian civilians, often in front of their families. They have killed Palestinians waving white flags. In April 2024, mass graves were found containing corpses with their hands tied. The corpses included women and the elderly.

Citing multiple Israeli field and intelligence officers from the war in Gaza, +972 Magazine and Local Call reported that, according to two sources, the IDF decided in the first weeks of the war to authorize killing up to 15 to 20 civilians per low-ranking militant, while for a senior militant such as a brigade or battalion commander, killing more than 100 civilians was authorized. An intelligence officer also said that Israel was not interested in killing Palestinian operatives when they were engaged in a military activity or in a military building only, but preferred to bomb them in their family homes "without hesitation" as a first option, explaining that "It’s much easier to bomb a family's home" where they are easier to locate and target. Another intelligence officer said that in targeting junior militants, Israel used only dumb bombs, which can destroy entire buildings, in order to not "waste expensive bombs on unimportant people".

In March 2024, Ha'aretz reported that some Israeli commanders had set up "kill zones" ("extermination zones" in Hebrew) in which soldiers were commanded to shoot and kill anyone on sight, even if they were unarmed.

In June 2024, the Associated Press found that Israel's campaign in Gaza was killing entire bloodlines of Palestinian families to a "degree never seen before".

According to testimony given to the Israeli Knesset, Israeli soldiers driving 62-ton D9 armoured bulldozers have been ordered to "run over terrorists, dead and alive, in the hundreds".

Starvation

Main article: Gaza Strip famine

On 26 February 2024, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International both released statements declaring Israel had failed to comply with the International Court of Justice's 26 January ruling to prevent genocide by blocking aid from entry into Gaza. Both statements reference the 16-year long blockade of Gaza, which has intensified since 9 October 2023. A report by Refugees International found that Israel had "consistently and groundlessly impeded aid operations within Gaza". Historian Melanie Tanielian argues that starvation, famine, and blockade should be foregrounded as methods of genocide alongside mass bombing. She references A. Dirk Moses's appeal not to ignore less spectacular forms of violence in the destruction of populations, and highlights multiple other genocides where famine and starvation were used as methods of destruction. In an April report, B'Tselem called the unfolding famine "the product of a deliberate and conscious Israeli policy".

In October 2023, the World Food Program warned of Gaza's dwindling food supply, and in December, alongside the United Nations, reported that more than half of Gaza's population was "starving", more than nine in ten were not eating every day, and 48% were suffering "extreme hunger". Palestinian Foreign Minister Riyad al-Maliki, who is part of the Palestinian Authority, said Israel was using starvation as a weapon: "they are starving because of Israel's deliberate use of starvation as a weapon of war against the people it occupied". An Israeli official called the charge "blood-libellous" and "delusional". In December 2023, Human Rights Watch similarly found that Israel was using starvation as a weapon of war by deliberately denying access to food and water. On 16 January 2024, U.N. experts accused Israel of "destroying Gaza's food system and using food as a weapon against the Palestinian people".

A car of the World Central Kitchen (WCK) aid organization after an Israeli attack on 1 April 2024, which killed seven of their workers. The WCK did not again operate in Gaza until 28 April.

The law professor and United Nations special rapporteur on the right to food, Michael Fakhri, said that Israel is "culpable" of genocide because "Israel has announced its intention to destroy the Palestinian people, in whole or in part, simply for being Palestinian" and because Israel was denying food to Palestinians by halting humanitarian aid and "intentionally" destroying "small-scale fishing vessels, greenhouses and orchards in Gaza ... We have never seen a civilian population made to go so hungry so quickly and so completely, that is the consensus among starvation experts. Israel is not just targeting civilians, it is trying to damn the future of the Palestinian people by harming their children." Since the ICJ ruling, the number of aid trucks Israel allows into Gaza has dropped by 40%. In the ICJ's March reaffirmation of provisional measures, the court highlighted the "unprecedented levels of food insecurity experienced by Palestinians in the Gaza Strip over recent weeks, as well as the increasing risks of epidemics", acknowledging that since the Court's January order there had been a "lack of Israeli compliance" resulting in "the catastrophic living conditions" deteriorating further.

On 11 March 2024, 12 Israeli human rights organisations signed an open letter accusing Israel of failing to abide by the ICJ ruling to prevent genocide by facilitating the delivery of humanitarian aid. In April, U.N. special rapporteur on the right to health Tlaleng Mofokeng said it was obvious that Israel was "killing and causing irreparable harm against Palestinian civilians with its bombardments", adding, "They are also knowingly and intentionally imposing famine, prolonged malnutrition and dehydration" and accusing Israel of "genocide".

In October 2024, Israel had reportedly adopted a modified version of the Generals' Plan. The proposed plan included orders for all residents of northern Gaza to leave within a week; the implementation of a full siege on water, food, and fuel; and then the arrest or killing of all who remained. By mid-October 2024, Israel had ordered the evacuation of northern Gaza and prevented the entry of humanitarian aid for almost two weeks. According to Stephen Devereux, avoidable deaths due to starvation as a result of Israeli policies "almost certainly constitutes a war crime and a crime against humanity".

On 21 November 2024, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu and the former defence minister Yoav Gallant, asserting that the pair "bear criminal responsibility for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare".

Deliberate destruction of civilian infrastructure

Mark Levene and Elyse Semerdjian locate the mass destruction of infrastructure within Israel's Dahiya doctrine that has been implemented against Gaza since 2006, with Levene calling it urbicide and a tool of genocide.

In October 2024, after monitoring and analyzing Israel's war conduct in Gaza for more than a year, Forensic Architecture published a map detailing Israel's campaign in Gaza titled "A Cartography of Genocide", accompanied by an 827-page text report that concludes that "Israel's military campaign in Gaza is organised, systematic, and intended to destroy conditions of life and life-sustaining infrastructure".

Attacks on healthcare

Photos of healthcare workers in Gaza killed in Israeli attacks, 25 November 2023

Main article: Attacks on health facilities during the Israel–Hamas war

In articles published in November 2023 in The Lancet and in February 2024 in the journal BMJ Global Health, multiple doctors detailed how, in their professional opinions, the targeting of Gazan health infrastructure and medical personnel coupled with various Israeli politicians' openly genocidal rhetoric amounts to genocide. Legal scholars have also supported this assessment. Gaza's healthcare system faced several humanitarian crises as a result of Israel's assault: hospitals faced a lack of fuel and began shutting down by 23 October as they ran out of fuel. When hospitals lost power completely, multiple premature babies in NICUs died. Israeli airstrikes have killed numerous medical staffers, and ambulances, health institutions, medical headquarters, and hospitals have been destroyed. Médecins Sans Frontières reported that scores of ambulances and medical facilities were damaged or destroyed, including the deaths of Médecins Sans Frontières staff. In late October, the Gaza Health Ministry said the healthcare system had "totally collapsed".

In April, U.N. special rapporteur on the right to health Tlaleng Mofokeng said, "The destruction of healthcare facilities continues to catapult to proportions yet to be fully quantified."

As of 25 August 2024, the United Nations estimated that most of Gaza's 2.2 million people were confined to a humanitarian area of roughly 15 square miles (39 km²), which causes crowded conditions and a critical lack of basic services, like clean water, and diseases spreading widely across the population, such as Hepatitis C.

Other

Since 7 October 2023, the IDF has been accused of indiscriminate mass arrest and detainment; making threats of mutilation, death, arson, and rape; and torturing Palestinians detained without legal charges. It has also been accused of using excessive force against dozens of schools and hospitals; theft; cruel and unnecessary desecration and mutilation of deceased Palestinians; and making no, or an inadequate, distinction between Hamas forces and civilians. The targeting and destruction of a variety of cultural and educational sites have also been cited as genocidal acts, as has the use of unconventional weapons such as white phosphorus.

Al Jazeera video of the 9 July 2024 Al-Awda School massacre
External video
Video of the air strike and its aftermath taken by a spectator filming a schoolyard football game. Contains graphic images of severe injury.
NBC News video on YouTube incorporating parts of the Al Jazeera footage and featuring comments from survivors

On 6 October 2024, Israel designated all of northern Gaza as a combat zone and ordered the entire civilian population to evacuate. Both Israeli military analysts and the Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights alleged that this was the first stage of the "General's Plan", a policy proposed by former Israeli general Giora Eiland to force Palestinians out of Gaza on pain of death. The UN Human Rights Office stated that Israel may be causing the "destruction of the Palestinian population in Gaza's northernmost governate through death and displacement."

Victims

Direct

Bags of charred, dismembered bodies of victims of Al-Tabaeen school attack

A Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor report released on 18 November 2023, which calls Israel's actions in Gaza a genocide, reported that 15,271 Palestinians in Gaza had been killed, 32,310 injured, and an estimated 41,500 were unaccounted for. The UN and many news outlets have estimated that about 70% of Palestinians killed in Gaza are women and children, with at least 20,000 Palestinians having been killed in Gaza by December 2023. By 14 January 2024, 100 days after Israel began its assault on Gaza, over 23,900 people had been confirmed killed. By 10 May, deaths had topped 35,000, a third of them unidentified bodies, with over 10,000 additional bodies estimated to be buried under the rubble. Within the first three weeks, the Israeli assault killed more children in Gaza than were killed worldwide across all conflict zones in any year since 2019. Over 52,000 people had been wounded by December 2023, and by May 2024 this had risen to over 77,700.

As of 31 August 2024, per the Gaza Ministry of Health, the number of fatalities had risen to 40,691 and the number of fatalities identified by name to 34,344. Among the fatalities identified by name, 17,652 (51%) were women and children, 2,955 (9%) were elderly of all genders, and 13,737 (40%) were men.

The proportion of women and children among the dead has been controversial. As of 7 May 2024, total deaths quoted by the UN were 34,735, of which 24,686 were fully identified. Among the fully identified, 52% were women and children, 8% were elderly of all genders, and 40% were men. In November 2024, the UN published an analysis covering only victims verified by at least three independent sources over six months between November 2023 and April 2024. It found that 70% of Palestinians killed in Gaza were women and children.

A graph of approximate deaths from the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza from 7 October 2023 to 5 November 2024

As the conflict has gone on, data collection has become increasingly difficult for the Gaza Ministry of Health (MoH) due to the destruction of infrastructure. The ministry has had to supplement its usual reporting based on hospital dead with other sources of information, including reports by the media and first responders as well as bereaved families and widows, who must formally register their husbands' deaths to qualify for government assistance. Professor of economics Mike Spagat analysed the ministry's reports and found an urgent need for a transparent methodology to reconcile its top-line death numbers – 34,535 as of 30 April – with its detailed breakdowns summing to 24,653 on the same date. The ministry's figures for the total number killed have also been contested by Israeli authorities, but have been accepted as accurate by Israeli intelligence services, the UN, and the WHO.

Indirect

Rasha Khatib, Martin McKee, and Salim Yusuf published in the correspondence section of The Lancet an estimate of the number of deaths that may be indirectly caused in the coming months and years by the conflict. Indirect Palestinian deaths from disease are expected to be much higher due to the intensity of the conflict, destruction of health care infrastructure, lack of food, water, shelter, and safe places for civilians to flee, and reduction in UNRWA funding. Using other conflicts as a reference point, they estimated that the total number of conflict-related deaths in Gaza would likely be three to 15 times higher than the reported death toll. By multiplying the reported deaths by five, they argued that according to a conservative estimate "186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza". Spagat wrote that their estimate "lacks a solid foundation and is implausible". Even so, Spagat allowed it was "fair to call attention to the fact that not all of the deaths are going to be direct violent ones" and has called the death toll in Gaza "staggeringly high".

Since the beginning of the Israel–Hamas war, nearly two million people have been displaced within the Gaza Strip. South Africa and others have criticized the Gaza Strip evacuations as a key component of the genocide.

According to a 2 October 2024 letter to President Joe Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, and others by 99 American healthcare workers who had served in Gaza since 7 October 2023, the most conservative estimate based on the available data was that at least 62,413 people in Gaza had died from starvation (based on starvation standards by the United States-funded Integrated Food Security Phase Classification), most of them young children, and at least 5,000 people had died from lack of access to care for chronic diseases.

Minimum number of victims

Applicable law does not require a minimum number of victims. Neither the Genocide Convention nor ICJ jurisprudence requires a minimum number of victims to establish genocide. Rather, genocide is established when qualified acts are committed against either a "reasonably significant number" or "a significant section of the group, such as its leadership". In the Gambia v Myanmar Rohingya genocide case, France and the United Kingdom (among others) affirmed that the "number of victims killed" is not a "focus" of the assessment, given that "circumstances may be such that the perpetrator cannot, or decides not to, avail itself of the fastest or most direct means" of destruction.

Genocidal intent and genocidal rhetoric

See also: Genocidal intent

Human rights lawyer Susan Akram, commenting on a May 2024 report by the University Network for Human Rights and on the resistance to labelling Israel's actions as genocide, said, "The opposition is political, as there is consensus amongst the international human rights legal community, many other legal and political experts, including many Holocaust scholars, that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza".

As part of the case Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al, Holocaust historian Barry Trachtenberg testified that there is a consensus among genocide historians that the situation in Gaza is a genocide, mainly because Israeli officials' statements make this clear. He said: "We are watching the genocide unfold as we speak. We are in this incredibly unique position where we can intervene to stop it, using the mechanisms of international law that are available to us."

In an open letter published on 15 October on Opinio Juris and the website of the Third World Approaches to International Law Review, scholars wrote that Israeli officials' statements since 7 October indicate intent to commit genocide. The NGO Law for Palestine compiled more than 500 statements by Israeli political and military officials that reportedly call for genocide. On 11 June 2024, the official Israeli X (formerly Twitter) account tweeted that "Gazan civilians participated in the horrific events of October 7", later citing a statement in a clip that "there are no innocent civilians there".

On 7 October, Netanyahu said that Israel would "exact a huge price from the enemy" and turn Hamas hideouts "into rubble". Omer Bartov, a Holocaust and genocide professor, interprets these statements as genocidal intent. In discussing genocidal actions and intent since 7 October, genocide scholar Mark Levene noted the increasing rhetoric of genocide and ethnic cleansing under the preceding Netanyahu governments. This was supported by Tia Goldenberg in AP News, who highlighted statements by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich as increasingly genocidal rhetoric under Netanyahu's government. Israeli historian Raz Segal and legal scholar Luigi Daniele also pointed to increasing genocidal rhetoric before October 2023, highlighting a May 2023 Times of Israel article that said that the only way to achieve peace is to "obliterate" Palestine and that Palestine's existence is "an affront to society, morality, humanity". The article further calls for reeducation of Palestinians and declares that they can enjoy rights only if they no longer exist as a nation. Segal and Daniele draw parallels between that article's rhetoric and scholarship that points to Russian media outlets' equivalent rhetoric in the Russian invasion of Ukraine as genocidal. Segal and Daniele also point to previous comments by National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, former Knesset member Ayelet Shaked, and Smotrich, who in February 2023 called for the destruction of Palestinian villages in the West Bank. Genocide scholar Shmuel Lederman detailed how these comments by Smotrich, alongside others denying Palestinian nationhood and calling for their destruction or removal from territory claimed by Israel, was in the forefront of political discussions by Hamas leadership in Gaza before the events of October 2023. News outlets at the time of Smotrich's comments also highlighted their genocidal nature.

Anatomy of a Genocide, a report presented to the UNHRC on 26 March 2024 by Francesca Albanese, Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, concluded that Israel was committing acts of genocide. Israel rejected the report. In a second report, Genocide as colonial erasure, released on 28 October for the UNGA, the rapporteur accused Israel of "carrying out a systematic campaign of forced displacement, destruction, and genocidal acts against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank".

In the ICJ's Rohingya genocide case, several states (including the UK and Germany) supported a looser standard of evidence for supporting genocidal intent than the ICJ has used in the past—which is often the most difficult part of proving genocide in a court of law. The states contended that the ICJ should "adopt a balanced approach that recognizes the special gravity of the crime of genocide, without rendering the threshold for inferring genocidal intent so difficult to meet so as to make findings of genocide near-impossible".

Israeli cabinet ministers

According to scholars Mark Levene and Abdelwahab El-Affendi, since 7 October 2023, a variety of official and semi-official sources and outlets have engaged in rhetoric suggestive of genocidal intent. Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard told The New Arab that the 7 October attacks, the Israel–Hamas war hostage crisis, and Hamas's war crimes "generated rage that transformed what has been the rhetoric of marginalised groups into a flood of statements now made by politicians, journalists and celebrities, ... provid[ing] a tailwind" for others to find such speech acceptable. He added, "We have become accustomed to genocidal rhetoric that comes from Hamas. The Hamas covenant has obvious severe antisemitic articles, and also some that could be interpreted as expressing desire to eliminate the Jews in Israel. ... In the past, it was seen inside Israel as something that was beyond the borders of legitimacy to talk that way about Palestinians. ... But October 7th broke that red line."

On 9 October 2023, Israeli Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant said,

We are imposing a complete siege on Gaza. There will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, everything will be closed. We are fighting against human animals and will act accordingly.

The statement was characterized as an example of dehumanisation. According to Kenneth Roth, while some excuse this remark as referring only to Hamas, the context makes clear that "human animals" refers to everyone in Gaza. The remarks have also been connected to the Gaza famine. On 10 October, Gallant said: "Gaza won't return to what it was before. There will be no Hamas. We will eliminate everything."

Israeli Minister of Agriculture Avi Dichter called for the war to be "Gaza's Nakba" on Channel 12. Ariel Kallner, another member of the Knesset from the Likud party, wrote on social media that there is "one goal: Nakba! A Nakba that will overshadow the Nakba of [1948]. Nakba in Gaza and Nakba to anyone who dares to join". Israeli Minister of Heritage Amihai Eliyahu called for dropping an atomic bomb on Gaza. Dov Waxman, director of UCLA's Y&S Nazarian Center for Israel Studies, said that some of the rhetoric right-wing ministers used can be perceived as "potentially genocidal" in its dehumanisation of Palestinian civilians. He added that these statements can only have limited impact on Israeli policy as they were made by ministers "not in the war cabinet", but the suggestions were nevertheless concerning.

Israeli energy minister Israel Katz said: "All the civilian population in Gaza is ordered to leave immediately. We will win. They will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world."

On 29 April 2024, Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said, "There are no half measures ... Rafah, Deir al-Balah, Nuseirat – total annihiliation. 'Thou shalt blot out the remembrance of Amalek from under heaven.' There is no place for them under heaven." The Israeli newspaper Haaretz described his comments as a call to genocide. In August, Smotrich said that "it might be justified and moral" to "starve 2 million people", lamenting that the world won't allow it.

Israeli president and members of Israeli parliament

President of Israel Isaac Herzog blamed the "entire nation" of Palestine for the 7 October attack. He added: "It is not true, this rhetoric about civilians being not aware, not involved. It is absolutely not true."

Yitzhak Kroizer, who represents the extreme-right Otzma Yehudit party in the Knesset, said in a radio interview that the "Gaza Strip should be flattened, and for all of them there is but one sentence, and that is death." Tally Gotliv of the Likud party called for the use of nuclear weapons against Gaza.

Invocations of Amalek

"Davidster" (Star of David) by Dick Stins, a.k.a. "the Amalek monument", is a Holocaust memorial in The Hague. The text at the side (in Dutch and Hebrew) is from Deuteronomy 25:17, 19 – "Remember what Amalek has done to you ... do not forget."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's repeated invocation of Amalek during the war has been considered evidence of genocidal intent by many critics, including South Africa. In a speech on 28 October 2023, Netanyahu said (in Hebrew) "You must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible", quoting from Deuteronomy 25:17 in the Hebrew Bible. The phrase "Remember what Amalek did to you" is used in Holocaust memorials, including Yad Vashem and the Hague Jewish Monument. Netanyahu made another allusion to the verse in a letter to IDF soldiers and officers.

Critics have connected Netanyahu's allusion to Amalek with 1 Samuel 15:3: "Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." Noah Lanard of Mother Jones called verses discussing Amalek among the Bible's most violent and wrote that they have a long history of being used by Jews on the far-right, such as Baruch Goldstein, to justify killing Palestinians. Amalek was "the foe that God ordered the ancient Israelites to genocide", and scholars have called the verse an instance of 'divinely mandated genocide'.

Other Israeli officials

Major General Ghassan Alian, Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories, said: "There will be no electricity and no water [in Gaza], there will only be destruction. You wanted hell, you will get hell."

IDF Major General Giora Eiland wrote, "Gaza will become a place where no human being can exist" and "Creating a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza is a necessary means to achieving the goal." Israeli historian and holocaust scholar Omer Bartov noted that no Israeli politician nor anyone in the IDF denounced this statement.

Of Israel's bombing of Gaza, the Israeli army spokesperson said, "while balancing accuracy with the scope of damage, right now we're focused on what causes maximum damage". Legal scholars interpreted this as intention to destroy Gaza.

Far-right politician and former Knesset member Moshe Feiglin said: "There is one and only solution, which is to completely destroy Gaza before invading it. I mean destruction like what happened in Dresden and Hiroshima, without nuclear weapons." Minister of Economy Nir Barkat later said, "I don't remember Britain or the United States, at the tail end of the Second World War bombing Dresden, thinking about the residents." Academics, non-Israeli politicians, and news organisations have also invoked the bombing of Dresden in justifying Israel's bombing of Gaza.

Legal scholar Nimer Sultany highlights statements by various Israeli army commanders leading ground operations in northern Gaza that call for depopulation and a "scorched earth" approach. Soldiers have echoed such sentiments on social media. Historian Yoav Di-Capua also points to the increasing number of officers and soldiers who are part of Hardal, which Di-Capua identifies as following a genocidal ideology.

Other evidence of genocidal intent

Maryam Jamshidi, a professor at University of Colorado Law School, cites Israel's stated goal to "destroy Hamas including both the extermination of its political and administrative leadership and the annihilation of its civilian police force and military wing", and its actual targeting of the "intellectual, cultural, and religious leadership of Gaza". Citing previous arguments made relating to the Bosnian genocide, she writes that genocidal intent can be proven "through evidence that the protected group’s civilian leadership, as well as its military and law enforcement, have been targeted for elimination" when this renders the rest of the group more vulnerable to various illegal abuses such as forced migration. Targeting civilian organizations controlled by Hamas is illegal under international law.

Elsewhere, Jamshidi argues that "the long-standing pattern of Israeli conduct towards Palestinians generally and in Gaza"—such as the blockade of Gaza, and destruction of civilian infrastructure during previous wars—high number of civilian deaths during the war, "mass forced displacement and ethnic cleansing" under the guise of humanitarian safe zones, "IDF practices that undercut Israel's claim that its 'war' is only against Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups rather than against Palestinian civilians", the abundance of atrocities recorded by smartphones and published by media, and UN expert reports supporting a finding of genocide increase the likelihood that the ICJ will rule in South Africa's favor.

In an article for the blog of the European Journal of International Law, John B. Quigley, a professor of law, argued that the conditions of life the war has inflicted on Gaza could be used as proof of genocidal intent in the absence of direct evidence, as they are so destructive that Israel should have known they would result in the extermination of Palestinians in Gaza.

Academic and legal discourse

See also: Palestinian genocide accusation § Academic discourse, and § Legal discourse

Holocaust and genocide studies

The opinions many scholars of Holocaust and genocide studies (HGS) expressed in late 2023 were discordant with others in the field as well as experts in other academic fields: they did not condemn Israeli violence despite the far larger loss of Palestinian life in the war.

On 13 October, Raz Segal called the intensified blockade of Gaza, which included the denial of water and food to the civilian population, a "textbook case of genocide" and connected it to the Nakba, the expulsion of Palestinians during the establishment of Israel in 1948. Other academics also called Israel's attacks on infrastructure, food, and water genocidal. On 19 October 2023, 100 civil society organisations and six genocide scholars sent Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court Karim Khan a letter calling on him to issue arrest warrants to Israeli officials for cases already before the prosecutor; to investigate new crimes committed in the Palestinian territories, including incitement to genocide, since 7 October; to issue a preventative statement against war crimes; and to remind all states of their obligations under international law. The letter said that Israeli officials' statements had shown "clear intent to commit war crimes, crimes against humanity and incitement to commit genocide, using dehumanizing language to describe Palestinians". The genocide scholars who signed the document were Raz Segal, Barry Trachtenberg, Robert McNeil, Damien Short, Taner Akçam, and Victoria Sanford. Segal called the war a "textbook case of genocide". In October 2024, Segal, Adam Jones, Ernesto Verdeja, and Michael Becker said there was evidence of genocide in Gaza, while Dov Waxman said there was not enough evidence of an "intent to destroy", though the Vox Media journalist who interviewed him noted that he was the only scholar who still held this opinion.

In a 3 November 2023 interview on MSNBC, Holocaust and genocide scholar Omer Bartov said, "the possibility of genocide is staring us in the face", and on 10 November 2023 he wrote: "My greatest concern watching the Israel-Gaza war unfold is that there is genocidal intent, which can easily tip into genocidal action." In a response to Bartov's article, a group of five Holocaust scholars, while acknowledging Israeli officials' "despicable statements that cannot be ignored", said that only a few officials made such statements and justified them by pointing to Hamas's crimes. The five scholars argued that the dehumanising language was "not evidence of genocidal intent". Bartov later said that since May 2024 it was "no longer possible to deny that Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions", while noting that very few people in Israel (apart from Palestinians) were willing to entertain this view. In November 2024, Bartov called recent operations in Jabalia "blatantly genocidal".

Sociologist and genocide scholar Martin Shaw argues that the term "genocide" was underused as states wish "to avoid the responsibilities to 'prevent and punish'" the convention imposes; moreover, he argues, there is "a special aversion to investigating its implications for Israel's conduct. Western states continue to protect it out of a misplaced belief that Jews, having been prime historical victims of genocide, cannot also be its perpetrators." In January 2024, Shaw's article "Inescapably Genocidal", published in the Journal of Genocide Research, noted that while the application of the framework of genocide to Palestine had, in the words of one commentator, "habitually evoked fanatical pushback", the nature of Israel's assault on Gaza "represented a strategic choice" rather than an inadvertent consequence, and thus calling it genocide was both warranted and inescapable.

Victoria Sanford, a professor at City University of New York, compared the events in Gaza to the 1960–1996 killing and disappearance of 200,000 Mayans in Guatemala, known as the Guatemalan genocide. Sanford and the Holocaust and genocide scholars Barry Trachtenberg and John Cox detailed the similarities between statements Israeli government officials and ministers made and those made during the genocides in Guatemala, Rwanda, Bosnia, Darfur, northern Iraq, and Myanmar.

Shmuel Lederman has called Israel's actions genocidal violence, but does not use the term "genocide", critiquing the simplification of intent in the term. He locates the situation in Gaza within a long and ongoing history of oppression, including mass surveillance, collective punishment, restrictions on travel and work, and settler-colonialism. He cites sociologist Eva Illouz's discussions of Gaza and human rights attorney Rabea Eghbariah's determination that Israel is conducting a genocide to highlight that even specialists using the same frame of analysis (the U.N. genocide convention) can disagree. Lederman has been criticised for not citing specialist genocide scholars' analysis of whether there is disagreement about whether Israel is conducting a genocide.

The accusation that Israel is committing genocide has been accused of being antisemitic. The anthropologist and sociologist Didier Fassin highlights three rhetorical formations that he identifies as repeatedly occurring: presenting 7 October 2023 as the beginning of events, ignoring any history before that; hyperbolic claims, such as calling the events of 7 October "a new Holocaust"; and distortion, where actions taken in Gaza are disputed and the statement that Israel has "the most moral army in the world" is frequently repeated.

Genocide scholar Mark Levene applied A. Dirk Moses's analysis that "absolute securitization lends itself to collective targeting of human groups, more precisely civilians, regardless of issues of ethnos or genos". In January 2024, Levene detailed how Israel's actions are ethnic cleansing at the very least, in line with the Israeli intelligence ministry's policy paper for a forcible and permanent transfer of all Gazans, supported by Netanyahu's government. Levene also argues that Israel's actions and its politicians' and officials' statements show that it is engaging in genocide.

Middle Eastern studies

In March 2024, the Middle East Studies Association released a statement condemning the "accelerating scale of genocidal violence being inflicted on the Palestinian population of Gaza" while also saying that Israel's conduct constitutes cultural genocide.

The sociologist and genocide scholar Uğur Ümit Üngör views the 2023 Israeli assault on Gaza as continuation of a history of "asymmetrical power relations, and annihilatory attitudes towards civilians". He calls Israeli actions "unmistakably counter-genocidal in terms of the quantity, quality, and dynamic of mass violence". Norman Finkelstein has argued that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's description of the Palestinians as "Amalek" was a call for genocide; he accused Israel of engaging in "genocidal war".

British-Israeli historian Ilan Pappé said, "What we see now are massacres which are part of the genocidal impulse, namely to kill people in order to downsize the number of people living in Gaza." Jewish Holocaust historian Amos Goldberg said that Israel's actions in Gaza exhibit all the elements of genocide, citing explicit intent from high-ranking officials, widespread incitement, and a pervasive dehumanisation of Palestinians in Israeli society. He also said, "Yes, it is genocide" of Israel's actions in Gaza. In an interview, Goldberg said, "What is happening in Gaza is a genocide because Gaza does not exist anymore." Historian Yoav Di-Capua charts a history of increasing genocidal ideology among Hardal, identifying Smotrich and Ben-Gvir as politicians who seek the adoption of this ideology as national policy and are using the Israel–Hamas war to implement their plan.

A Brookings 23 May to 6 June 2024 survey asked 758 Middle East scholars and experts who study the issue, most in the United States: "How would you define Israel's current military actions in Gaza?" The responses were: "major war crimes akin to genocide", 41%; "genocide", 34%; "major war crimes but not akin to genocide", 16%; "unjustified actions but not major war crimes", 4%; "justified actions under the right to self-defense", 4%; and "I don't know", 2%.

International law scholars

Jurist William Schabas, one of the world's preeminent experts on international criminal law, wrote in January 2024: "To me it is increasingly clear that Israel is not aiming to defeat Hamas, but rather to uproot or erase the population of Gaza." In June 2024, Schabas said that of all recent genocide cases at the International Court of Justice, the case brought by South Africa was the strongest, citing the destruction of Gazan infrastructure and statements made by politicians in Israel that Gazans are inhuman or "human animals" and that Israel would deny them electricity, water, and medical care.

In a May 2024 interview, former ACLU director and Human Rights Watch co-founder Aryeh Neier detailed how Israel's blocking of aid and the subsequent starvation of the Gazan population is indicative of genocide. Barry Trachtenberg, a professor at Wake Forest University, said, "What Israel has been doing since October 7 is clearly in strong violation of international law – of the Conventions on Genocide, and Geneva Conventions on the pursuit of war." A joint report by the University Network for Human Rights and Boston University School of Law found that "Israel has committed genocidal acts, namely killing, seriously harming, and inflicting conditions of life calculated, and intended to, bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza." In May, the legal scholar Nimer Sultany detailed and supported Forensic Architecture's assessment that Israel had weaponised international humanitarian law into "humanitarian violence".

In December 2023, Luis Moreno Ocampo, former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, told Al Jazeera that the siege of Gaza was a form of genocide due to Israel's imposing conditions of life on Gaza that would lead to the deaths of Palestinians. In January 2024, a number of prominent Israelis, represented by human rights lawyer Michael Sfard, sent Israel's attorney general and state prosecutor an open letter detailing examples of "the discourse of annihilation, expulsion and revenge". The signatories said that the Israeli judiciary was ignoring incitement to genocide in Gaza.

Anisha Patel, a legal analyst at the human rights group Law for Palestine, claims to have identified more than 400 expressions of genocidal intent by members of the Israeli government, including Netanyahu. Patel said that Israel's claims of self-defence were illegitimate due to the disproportionate scale of their attacks on Gaza.

In April 2024, the German legal scholar and jurist Stefan Talmon told Süddeutsche Zeitung that Israel was not committing genocide in Gaza, although he conceded that Israel had committed war crimes. International law professor Sabine Swoboda also argued that although Israel may have broken international law, it had not committed genocide because its intent was not genocidal.

Israeli lawyer and international law specialist Eugene Kontorovich called the genocide allegations "absolutely absurd" and a "farce", and called for Israel to immediately end its acceptance of the ICJ's jurisdiction in response to South Africa's case.

In an op-ed in the New York Daily News, former Director of the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Special Investigations Eli Rosenbaum wrote that Israel's actions in Gaza are not genocidal but in fact seeking to "prevent genocide" by Hamas.

Others

On 13 November 2023, the German philosopher and social theorist Jürgen Habermas and three of his colleagues at Goethe University Frankfurt published a statement in which they said that attributing genocidal intent to Israel's actions in Gaza was a misjudgment. This statement triggered public debate in Germany.

In December 2023, in correspondence published in The Lancet, multiple specialists in international medicine and humanitarian aid reiterated warnings of the risk of genocide, while detailing how Israel's blocking of humanitarian support and aid were leading to unnecessary deaths, and how the death rate would only continue to worsen. They called signatories to the Genocide Convention to enforce a ceasefire on Israel.

Palestinian-Israeli writer Nimer Sultany argued that, by mid-2024, a growing consensus among legal scholars suggests that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza.

Multiple public declarations from various journals and academic organisations have been released warning of a potential genocide and declaring opposition to an ongoing genocide.

Others, such as the historians Michael Berenbaum and Polly Zavadivker, claim that discussing the Israeli assault on Gaza as a potential genocide is a threat to the future successful prosecution of the crime of genocide and a threat to Holocaust and genocide studies as a field, and that describing the assault as "engaged in ethnic cleansing, war crimes, crimes against humanity or has genocidal intentions" actively inhibits the ability to resolve the conflict.

In an interview with the editor-in-chief of Jewish Currents on her decision to publish Raz Segal's work, the New Left Review opined that disagreement over use of the term "genocide" stemmed partly from tensions between the goals of being "emotionally powerful" and "analytically precise". According to historian Enzo Traverso, the Genocide Convention's definition of genocide "describes exactly what is happening in Gaza today".

Statements by political organisations and governments

World leaders and governments

Positions of national governments on whether Israel is committing genocide in the Israel–Hamas war

  Agree

  Disagree

  Unclear

  Defer to the ruling in the ICJ case South Africa v. Israel

  No data

Country positions on recognition of genocide

Country	Recognition of genocide	Statement	References
Afghanistan	Yes	The Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned Israel's actions as genocide.
Algeria	Yes	In a speech before the UN General Assembly, President Abdelmadjid Tebboune asked "[W]here is the global conscience that has become absent regarding the genocide being committed?"
Bangladesh	Yes	The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Israel was committing genocide against Palestinians.
Belgium	Forthcoming	Belgium has vowed to support the verdict of the ICJ in South Africa v. Israel.
Bolivia	Yes	President Luis Arce posted on X that he agreed with President Lula of Brazil concerning "the truth about the genocide that is being committed against the brave Palestinian people".
Brazil	Yes	President Lula da Silva condemned Israel's actions as genocide, saying: "What's happening in the Gaza Strip with the Palestinian people hasn't happened at any other moment in history. Actually, it has happened: when Hitler decided to kill the Jews."
Canada	Forthcoming	Prime minister Justin Trudeau and Foreign Minister Melanie Joly neither endorsed nor rejected South Africa's case against Israel. Joly said she would watch the case "very closely" and Global Affairs Canada promised to abide by any decision the court reaches.
Chile	Yes	President Gabriel Boric has condemned both Hamas and Israel's actions in Gaza, saying he refuses to choose between "the terrorism of Hamas and the genocide that Israel is carrying out in Palestine". Chile has also joined a genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.
Colombia	Yes	President Gustavo Petro posted on X in Spanish: "It's called genocide, they do it to remove the Palestinian people from Gaza and take it over. The head of the state who carries out this genocide is a criminal against humanity. Their allies cannot talk about democracy." On 29 February 2024, Petro announced the country would cease importing Israeli arms in the wake of the Flour massacre.
Cuba	Yes	On 31 March 2024, president Miguel Diaz-Canel stated that "Cuba demands that the genocide stop now."
Djibouti	Yes	President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh said that Palestinians were being subjected to genocide during the war.
France	Unclear	Former Foreign Minister Stéphane Séjourné rejected the accusation of genocide on 17 January 2024, saying, "Accusing the Jewish state of genocide crosses a moral threshold." But France's UN Ambassador Nicolas de Rivière also said that "France [will] see what [the ICJ] decide on this matter and we'll make sure that we'll support the outcome of the decision."
Germany	No	Government spokesman Steffen Hebestreit rejected the genocide accusation.
Guyana	Yes	President Mohamed Irfaan Ali has called Israel's actions "nothing short of genocide".
Honduras	Yes	In a speech before the UN General Assembly on 25 September 2024, President Xiomara Castro called for "an end to the genocide in Gaza".
Hungary	No	Foreign Minister Péter Szijjártó described the genocide accusation as "nonsense".
Indonesia	Yes	Speaking before the UN General Assembly on 23 September 2024, then Foreign Minister Retno Marsudi said that "the ongoing genocide by Israel must be stopped immediately".
Iran	Yes	Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian condemned Israel's actions as genocide.
Iraq	Yes	On 8 May 2024, Prime Minister Mohammed Shia' Al Sudani said that Israel's war in Gaza is tantamount to genocide.
Ireland	Forthcoming	Foreign Minister Micheál Martin has stated "It is for the [ICJ] to determine whether genocide is being committed." On 7 November 2024, the Dáil Éireann passed a non-binding motion stating that "genocide is being perpetrated before our eyes by Israel in Gaza".
Italy	No	In an interview on 11 January 2024, Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said that, while Israel has targeted civilians during the war in Gaza, "genocide is something else".
Jordan	Yes	Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said that Israel's actions met the legal definition of genocide.
Kyrgyzstan	Yes	On 18 March 2024, Kyrgyzstan's government called on Israel and the U.S. to stop the "madness and the genocide" in Gaza.
Lebanon	Yes	Prime minister Najib Mikati expressed concern "with the ongoing genocide against the Palestinians".
Libya	Yes	In May 2024, Libya filed a declaration of intervention in South Africa's genocide case against Israel as it believes that Israel is committing genocide.
Malaysia	Yes	Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim condemned Israel's actions as genocide and associated the United States as being complicit.
Maldives	Yes	On 24 September 2024, President Mohamed Muizzu said before the UN General Assembly that "the genocide by Israel in Gaza is a travesty of justice and the international system".
Mauritania	Yes	The government of Mauritania condemned Israel's actions and called on the international community to "impose an immediate cessation of the genocide to which the Palestinian people are subjected".
Namibia	Yes	In January 2024, President Hage Geingob of Namibia called Israel's actions in Gaza "genocidal and gruesome" and sharply criticised Germany's decision to back Israel in South Africa v. Israel, saying that Germany had an "inability to draw lessons from its horrific history", including the Herero and Nama Genocide in German Southwest Africa.
Nicaragua	Yes	Nicaragua has condemned Israel's accusations as genocide and accused Germany of complicity by exchanging weapons to Israel. In October 2024, Nicaragua severed diplomatic ties with Israel after its invasion of Lebanon, calling the Israeli government "fascist" and "genocidal", and Netanyahu "the son of the Devil".
North Korea	Yes	A foreign ministry spokesman said a bombing of a hospital during the war "show[ed] that the U.S. is an accomplice who connived at and fostered Israel's genocide".
Norway	Forthcoming	On 2 September 2024, Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said, "We welcome the use of the ICJ, but leave to the court to assess whether the accusation of genocide is correct."
Oman	Yes	The Foreign Ministry condemned Israel's actions as genocide.
Pakistan	Yes	Foreign minister Jalil Abbas Jilani condemned Israel's actions as genocide.
Palestine	Yes	President Mahmoud Abbas condemned Israel's actions as genocide. Palestinian Ambassador to the United Nations Riyad Mansour said Israel's bombardment and siege of Gaza were "nothing less than genocidal".
Paraguay	No	In a statement on 10 January 2024, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs rejected the accusations of genocide presented against Israel at the ICJ.
Qatar	Yes	The Ministry of Foreign Affairs called on the UN Security Council "to take urgent action to prevent the Israeli occupation forces from storming Rafah and committing genocide in" Rafah. Qatari emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani said Israel had committed "a crime of genocide".
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines	Yes	On 11 January 2024, the Prime Minister's office released a statement of support for South Africa's case against Israel at the ICJ, calling on the court to adopt provisional measures in order to "prevent any further acts of genocide against the Palestinian people". The statement also called on other countries to stop providing material support to Israel, accusing those who continue to do so of being "complicit in genocide before our very eyes".
Saudi Arabia	Yes	The Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned the "continued genocidal massacres against the Palestinian people at the hands of the Israeli war machine".
Senegal	Yes	Prime minister Ousmane Sonko condemned Israel's actions as genocide and accused other countries of complicity.
Somalia	Yes	The Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged "swift action to halt Gaza genocide by Israel".
South Africa	Yes	South African president Cyril Ramaphosa said, "The fact that Palestinian deaths are not solely caused by bombardment and ground attacks, but also by disease and starvation, indicates a need to protect the group's right to exist".
Spain	Forthcoming	Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares stated "Whether this is genocide or not, that is for the [World] court to decide, and Spain of course will support its decision." Several individual government ministers have publicly called Israel's warfare in Gaza genocide, including Second Deputy Prime Minister Yolanda Díaz, Defence Minister Margarita Robles, Youth Minister Sira Rego, and former Social Affairs Minister Ione Belarra.
Syria	Yes	President Bashar al-Assad condemned Israel's actions as genocide.
Tunisia	Yes	According to WAFA, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded an end to Israel's "war of genocide" in May 2024.
Turkey	Yes	President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan condemned Israel's actions as "amounting to genocide". On 9 February 2024, Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan said that the international community's silence on Israel's actions in Gaza were "complicity in genocide".
United Kingdom	No	The Foreign Office dismissed the accusation of genocide against Israel. Prime Minister Keir Starmer refused to call Israel's actions in Gaza "genocide".
United States	No	Secretary of State Antony Blinken dismissed the genocide accusation as "meritless". President Joe Biden dismissed the accusation of genocide against Israel.
Vatican City	Unclear	In November 2023, several witnesses to a speech by Pope Francis said that he called Israel's actions a genocide, but a Vatican spokesman denied this. Francis later called for an investigation "to determine whether it fits into the technical definition [of genocide] formulated by jurists and international bodies".
Venezuela	Yes	President Nicolás Maduro condemned Israel's actions as genocide.
Yemen	Yes	The Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned Israel's actions as "war crimes and genocide".

On 17 February, African Union president Moussa Faki said: "Gaza is being completely annihilated and its people are deprived of all their rights. We denounce the Israeli operation, which has no parallel in the history of humanity."

In March 2024, the EU's top diplomat, Josep Borrell, told the U.S. Secretary of State, "The very survival of the population in Gaza is at stake today."

On 26 March, Pakistan's OIC representative said that Israel's desire for a "final solution to the Palestinian question is plain for all to see, as its forces encircle Rafah like vultures and its ravenous land grab continues unabated". In May 2024, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation called on member states to end "the export of weapons and ammunition used by its army to perpetrate the crime of genocide in Gaza".

On 17 November 2024, Pope Francis called for an investigation into whether Israel's actions in Gaza constitute genocide.

Civil servants and elected representatives

See also: List of US officials resigned over Biden's support for Israel in Gaza war

On 2 February 2024, it was reported that more than 800 civil servants from the U.S., U.K., and the European Union, including many senior officials, had signed an open letter criticising their governments' "public, diplomatic and military support" of Israel as "given without real conditions or accountability", and warning that their governments' policies on Gaza "are contributing to grave violations of international law, war crimes and even ethnic cleansing or genocide".

On 5 April 2024, Elizabeth Warren became the first senator from the United States, Israel's closest military ally, to publicly say that the assault on Gaza would be legally ruled a genocide. According to her office, Warren was expressing a legal analysis rather than her personal view. U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar said that she feared the U.S. government and its citizens were "going to be complicit in genocide". In May 2024, Senator Fatima Payman became the first member of the Australian Labor Party to call Israel's actions a genocide, saying, "This is a genocide and we need to stop pretending otherwise."

NGOs and intergovernmental organisations

After Israel started its military operation against Hamas, both Genocide Watch and the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention issued statements warning of the imminent risk of genocide. In December, the Lemkin Institute said that it viewed Israel's continuing actions as genocide.

In November 2023, Defence for Children International (DCI) accused the U.S. of complicity in Israel's "crime of genocide". In March 2024, DCI addressed the famine affecting Gaza: "The starvation of children is a hallmark of genocide and a deliberate political choice by Israel, backed by the Biden administration." Three Palestinian rights groups, Al-Haq, Al Mezan, and the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, filed a lawsuit with the International Criminal Court (ICC) urging it to investigate Israel for apartheid and genocide and issue arrest warrants for Israeli leaders. In a statement commemorating Land Day, the Arab Parliament wrote that Israel "aims to destroy the identity of an entire people".

In December 2023, the International Federation for Human Rights said Israel's actions in Gaza constituted an unfolding genocide. In February 2024, ahead of Israel's announced military assault on Rafah, Amnesty International head Agnes Callamard wrote: "Amnesty is reiterating that Palestinians in Gaza are at grave risk of genocide. The international community has an obligation to act to prevent genocide." In March 2024, Callamard said the international community "must uphold their obligations under the Genocide Convention and take concrete measures to protect Palestinians in Gaza today". In October 2024, Medical Aid for Palestinians released a statement calling for the protection of Palestinians against potential genocide that said, "Gaza is being erased in front of our eyes." Later that month, Oxfam and 37 other humanitarian organizations warned that Israel was failing to comply with Article II of the Genocide Convention as it wiped Northern Gaza "off the map". Oxfam further stated that it was "impossible not to believe" that Israel's aim was the forced displacement of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip.

Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor documented evidence of executions committed by the IDF. It submitted the evidence and documentation to the International Criminal Court and the U.N. special rapporteur. Jewish Voice for Peace said: "The Israeli government has declared a genocidal war on the people of Gaza. As an organization that works for a future where Palestinians and Israelis and all people live in equality and freedom, we call on all people of conscience to stop imminent genocide of Palestinians."

United Nations

In November 2023, a group of UN special rapporteurs wrote, "We remain convinced that the Palestinian people are at grave risk of genocide." UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights to Safe Drinking Water and Sanitation Pedro Arrojo said that based on article 7 of the Rome Statute, which counts "deprivation of access to food or medicine, among others" as a form of extermination, "even if there is no clear intention, the data show that the war is heading towards genocide".

A group of U.N. experts said there was "evidence of increasing genocidal incitement" against Palestinians.

In response to a January 2024 Times of Israel report that the Israeli government was in talks with the Congolese government to take Palestinian refugees from Gaza, U.N. special rapporteur Balakrishnan Rajagopal said, "Forcible transfer of Gazan population is an act of genocide."

In May 2024, UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women Reem Alsalem said that Palestinian women "are experiencing a full-blown genocide. They are being exterminated. There are few places in the world where we've seen something like this." The UNHCR Special Rapporteur on adequate housing, Balakrishnan Rajagopal, said that Israel's destruction of Gaza "constitutes an act of genocide as well because the purpose of that destruction, exceeding 70 to 80 percent across Gaza, is to make the place uninhabitable for the people of Gaza".

In October 2024, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights released a report that accused the Israeli military of "the crime against humanity of extermination" for killing health workers and targeting health facilities.

On 8 November 2024, the United Nations human rights office condemned many violations of international law that "could amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity and possibly even 'genocide'", calling on third states to prevent "atrocity crimes".

On 14 November 2024, the UN Special Committee to investigate Israeli practices published a report for presentation to the UN General Assembly, concluding that Israeli practices in Gaza are consistent with the characteristics of genocide.

Legal proceedings

International Criminal Court

In 2021, the Pretrial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court confirmed that the court had jurisdiction in its investigation in Palestine. On 12 October 2023, the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim Ahmad Khan, confirmed that war crimes committed by Israeli nationals in Gaza are within the investigation's purview.

On 20 May 2024, Khan applied for arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Defence Yoav Gallant, saying he had reasonable grounds to believe they bore criminal responsibility for the following war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the Gaza strip from at least 8 October 2023:

• Starvation of civilians as a method of warfare as a war crime;
• Wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health, or cruel treatment as a war crime;
• Wilful killing, or murder as a war crime;
• Intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population as a war crime;
• Extermination and/or murder, including in the context of deaths caused by starvation, as a crime against humanity;
• Persecution as a crime against humanity;
• Other inhumane acts as crimes against humanity.

The list of crimes did not include genocide, which is legally distinct from extermination.

Reporters Without Borders filed several complaints with the International Criminal Court over the more than 100 Palestinian journalists and media workers killed in the first eight months of the war. On 27 May 2024, it filed its third such complaint, noting that another eight Palestinian journalists had been killed in Gaza between 20 December 2023 and 20 May 2024 and that one journalist had been injured. The organisation said it had "reasonable grounds for thinking that some of these journalists were deliberately killed and that the others were the victims of deliberate IDF attacks against civilians".

U.S. Center for Constitutional Rights lawsuit

Main article: Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al

On 13 November 2023, the Center for Constitutional Rights sued U.S. President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. The suit alleges that Israel's "mass killings", targeting of civilian infrastructure, and forced expulsions amount to genocide, writing: "As Israel's closest ally and strongest supporter, being its biggest provider of military assistance by a large margin and with Israel being the largest cumulative recipient of US foreign assistance since World War II, the United States has the means available to have a deterrent effect on Israeli officials now pursuing genocidal acts against the Palestinian people in Gaza." Genocide expert William Schabas supported the lawsuit, saying he believed there was a "serious risk of genocide" and the U.S. was "in breach of its obligation, under both the 1948 Genocide Convention to which it is a party as well as customary international law, to use its position of influence with the government of Israel and to take the best measures within its power to prevent the crime taking place". On 16 November, the scholars Victoria Sanford, Barry Trachtenberg, and John Cox filed a declaration in support of the CCR's lawsuit. During the court case, Trachtenberg testified that the U.S. must act and not repeat its failure to take a stand against the violence against Jews in Nazi Germany leading up to the Holocaust.

A federal judge dismissed the case Defense for Children International-Palestine et al v. Biden et al on 31 January 2024, saying the Constitution prevents his court from determining foreign policy, which is reserved to the political branches of the U.S. government, though he wrote that "as the ICJ has found, it is plausible that Israel's conduct amounts to genocide".; the judge also commented that he would have preferred to have issued the injunction and urged Biden to rethink U.S. policy, writing that the court "implores defendants to examine the results of their unflagging support of the military siege against the Palestinians in Gaza".

International Court of Justice application

Main article: South Africa v. Israel (Genocide Convention)

Stances of states:

  South Africa

  Countries that have supported South Africa's case

  Countries that have opposed South Africa's case

  Israel

South Africa has instituted proceedings at the International Court of Justice pursuant to the Genocide Convention, to which both Israel and South Africa are signatories, accusing Israel of committing genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity against Palestinians in Gaza. South African president Cyril Ramaphosa compared Israel's actions to apartheid. South Africa's application was brought pursuant to Article IX of the convention. Several human rights organisations, international organisations, and other nations supported South Africa's suit.

In an application filed on 29 December 2023, South Africa argued that Israel's actions "are genocidal in character because they are intended to bring about the destruction of a substantial part of the Palestinian national, racial and ethnical group". South Africa requested that the ICJ issue a legal order on an interim basis (i.e., before hearing the merits of the application) requiring Israel to "immediately suspend its military operations in and against Gaza". Adjudication of the merits of the case may take years, but such an order could be issued within weeks. In a statement to the ICJ during the proceedings, the South African ambassador to the Netherlands argued that the current assault on Gaza is not an individual event but the escalation of "Israel's 25-year apartheid, 56-year occupation, and 16-year siege imposed on the Gaza Strip".

Balkees Jarrah, associate international justice director at Human Rights Watch, notes that the ICJ case is not a prosecution of individuals, and does not involve the International Criminal Court, which is a separate body. Jarrah said that the case presents an opportunity to "provide clear, definitive answers on the question of whether Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people".

On 6 March 2024, South Africa asked the ICJ to order additional measures against Israel because Gazans are facing mass starvation.

Israeli response

Israeli government spokesman Eylon Levy rejected the allegations "with disgust" and accused South Africa of cooperating with Hamas, calling South Africa's claims "blood libel" that abets "the modern heirs of the Nazis". On 2 January 2024, Israel decided to appear before the ICJ in response to South Africa's case, despite a history of ignoring international tribunals. On 13 January, Netanyahu said, "No one will stop us. Not The Hague, not the Axis of Evil, no one." Israeli officials called the court antisemitic. Israel's position is that "while unfortunate, the mass killing of thousands of Palestinian civilians is necessary, unavoidable, and justifiable self-defense."

South Africa's actions found support from some Israeli politicians, including Ofer Cassif.

ICJ ruling

On 26 January 2024, the ICJ issued a preliminary ruling finding that the rights asserted in South Africa's filing were "plausible", and issued an order to Israel requiring it to take all measures in its power to prevent acts of genocide, to prevent and punish incitement to genocide, and to allow basic humanitarian services into Gaza.

Occupation proceedings

In the legal consequences arising from the policies and practices of Israel in the occupied Palestinian territory including East Jerusalem, Qatar said, "Israel's genocidal war on the people of Gaza has shown that the situation in Palestine is the most pressing threat to international peace and security".

German lawsuit

In February 2024, lawyers representing Palestinians in Germany filed a criminal complaint against various senior politicians, including Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, Economic Minister Robert Habeck, and Finance Minister Christian Lindner, for "aiding and abetting" genocide in Gaza.

Nicaragua v. Germany

Main article: Nicaragua v. Germany

On 1 March 2024, Nicaragua initiated proceedings against Germany at the ICJ under the Genocide Convention concerning Germany's support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war. It sought the indication of provisional measures of protection, including resumption of suspended German funding of the UNRWA and cessation of military supplies to Israel.

Australian legal proceedings

In March 2024, Sydney-based firm Birchgrove Legal referred Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, and others to the ICC as accessories to genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity, citing the defunding of UNRWA, the provision of military aid, and "unequivocal political support" for Israel's actions during the Israel–Hamas War.

International complicity

See also: War crimes in the Israel–Hamas war § CCR lawsuit against Joe Biden

Some commentators have accused Western media and governments of supporting genocide against Palestinians, especially those of the United States. Among other journalists and scholars, the Canada-based sociologist M. Muhannad Ayyash has accused the U.S. of complicity in genocide, in this case amid the Israel–Hamas war, in which the U.S. has given Israel significant aid.

In January 2024, former UNRWA spokesperson Chris Gunness said that the U.S. and U.K. are complicit in genocide against Gaza. In March, OXFAM released a statement detailing its intention, alongside several other NGOs, to sue Denmark to prevent arms sales to Israel, warning that by selling arms Denmark is "complicit in violations of international humanitarian law ... and a plausible genocide". In August, legal academic Shahd Hammouri said there was a "very strong" case for Western countries, particularly the U.S., being complicit in genocide against Palestinians.

Legal scholar Matiangai Sirleaf has written that Gaza "is the first 'live-streamed' genocide in history" but that clear information about what is happening has not translated into effective action by the international community. The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Palestine said, "States may be complicit in failing to prevent genocide if they do not act in compliance" with the International Court of Justice's orders, or if they directly aided or assisted in "the commission of genocide".

American complicity

See also: United States support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war and United States complicity in Israeli war crimes in the Israel–Hamas war

"Joenicide" redirects here. For President Joseph Biden's nickname, see list of nicknames of presidents of the United States § Joe Biden.

Pro-Palestine rally in Austin, Texas, United States, 12 November 2023

On 13 October 2023, journalist Eric Levitz of The Intelligencer argued that U.S. administrations, including the Biden administration, have given approval to Israeli war crimes against Palestinians in the Israel–Hamas war. On 4 January 2024, the U.S. government acknowledged that it was not formally assessing whether Israel was violating international humanitarian law.

In November 2023, critics of President Joe Biden nicknamed him "Genocide Joe" for his support for Israel. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby, described by Israeli media outlet Ynet as "an exceptionally accomplished Israeli advocate", said: "Israel's trying to defend itself against a genocidal terrorist threat. So if we're going to start using that word, fine, let's use it appropriately." On 13 November 2023, the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) sued Biden for allegedly failing in his duty, defined under national and international laws, to prevent Israel from committing genocide in Gaza in the Israel–Hamas war.

In February 2024, the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention said the Biden administration was complicit in genocide in Gaza: "None of the Biden Administration's tactics to deny genocide and avoid accountability will withstand the test of time. President Biden and key administration officials are on a path to be remembered as the principal enablers of one of the worst genocides in the 21st century." Ali Harb wrote, "US weapons have continued to flow to Israel to arm a military carrying out a suspected genocide in Gaza. At the same time, Biden is pushing to secure $14bn in additional aid for the US ally." In February 2024, after the U.S. vetoed a U.N. ceasefire resolution, Cuban president Miguel Diaz-Canel Bermudez said, "They are accomplices of this genocide of Israel against Palestine." Karen Wells et al. also point to the $14.3 billion in their article in the journal Children's Geographies as evidence of U.S. complicity in Israel's "genocidal war". Research conducted in 2024 showed that Israel's military relies heavily on fuel imports from the U.S. for its operations in Gaza. Francesca Albanese said that America's provision of fuel to Israel after the ICJ's provisional ruling was "a breach of the Genocide Convention".

Rhetoric from U.S. politicians

In the Florida legislature, Democratic U.S. Representative Angie Nixon sponsored a resolution calling for "de-escalation" and a ceasefire to end the killing of Palestinians. She said: "We are at 10,000 dead Palestinians. How many will be enough?" Republican Representative Michelle Salzman replied, "All of them." Nixon then interrupted her speech, saying, "One of my colleagues just said 'All of them'. Wow." Some commentators have called Salzman's remark a call for genocide. Nixon and the Florida chapter of the Council on American–Islamic Relations called for her to be censured or resign. CAIR-Florida Executive Director Imam Abdullah Jaber said in a statement: "This chilling call for genocide by an American lawmaker is the direct result of decades of dehumanization of the Palestinian people by advocates of Israeli apartheid and their eager enablers in government and the media." Executive director of the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USPCR) Ahmad Abuznaid said, "There is a bipartisan effort to dehumanize the Palestinian people", referring especially to Biden voicing doubt about the accuracy of the Palestinian death count and attacks on Palestinian-American Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib for her criticism of Israel's military offensive.

Republican U.S. Representative and former Donald Trump aide Max Miller, said that Palestine is "about to get eviscerated... to turn that into a parking lot". He previously called on the Biden administration "to get out of Israel's way and to let Israel do what it needs to do best" and said there should be "no rules of engagement" during Israel's bombardment of Gaza. Miller also questioned the accuracy of the Gaza Health Ministry's claim that 10,000 people have been killed in Gaza, saying that he believes many of those killed have been "Hamas terrorists", not innocent civilians, and that the U.S. does not "trust an entity that puts munitions in mosques, and churches and in hospitals".

In December, former Republican U.S. Representative Michele Bachmann said on The Charlie Kirk Show: "So it's time that Gaza ends. The two million people who live there, they are clever assassins. They need to be removed from that land. That land needs to be turned into a national park. And since they're the voluntary mercenaries for Iran, they need to be dropped on the doorstep of Iran. Let Iran deal with those people." She received a round of applause from the audience. Kirk replied: "I look at Israel and Israel says we never want another person into our country that doesn't share our values. They said they don't want refugees. They don't want any of these people. I want American immigration policy to be like that."

A 26 February 2024 vigil outside the Israeli embassy in Washington, D.C. with a sign accusing the United States of supporting genocide.

Republican U.S. Representative Brian Mast compared all Palestinians to Nazis in November on the House floor. On 31 January 2024, Mast said that Palestinian babies are not innocent civilians but "terrorists" who should be killed, that more infrastructure in Gaza needs to be destroyed, and "It would be better if you kill all the terrorists and kill everyone who are supporters."

Republican Representative Andy Ogles, when asked by an activist about the deaths of Palestinian children, said: "I think we should kill 'em all...Hamas and the Palestinians have been attacking Israel for 20 years. It's time to pay the piper." His comments were widely denounced by supporters of Palestine, including the American Muslim Advisory Council, as a call for genocide. Ogles said in response that his remarks were directed at Hamas rather than Palestinians in general.

In an interview with Fox News on 5 March 2024, former president and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump said that Biden "dumped Israel" due to being overly influenced by pro-Palestinian protests, that "the Democrats are very bad for Israel", that he supports Israel's ongoing offensive in Gaza, that Israel has to "finish the problem", and that the Biden administration "got soft", which some commentators viewed as a call to continue and "double down" on genocidal acts. Trump's campaign also said that, if elected, he would bar Gaza residents from entering the U.S. as part of an expanded travel ban.

In a town hall meeting on 25 March 2024, Republican U.S. Representative Tim Walberg said that Palestinian civilians should have nuclear weapons used against them, "like Nagasaki and Hiroshima", to "get it over quick".

Democratic U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib accused Biden of supporting "the genocide of the Palestinian people". Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene sponsored a resolution to censure Tlaib. Craig Mokhiber of the UN High Commission for Human Rights resigned, criticising the organisation for its response to the Israel–Hamas war. He later said that Israel's actions against Gaza are a "classic case of textbook genocide".

A group of eight Democratic U.S. senators, led by Bernie Sanders, Jeff Merkley, and Chris Van Hollen, wrote Biden an official letter calling on him to "enforce federal law" by requiring Prime Minister Netanyahu "to stop restricting humanitarian aid access to Gaza or forfeit U.S. military aid to Israel", as "the severe humanitarian catastrophe unfolding in Gaza is nearly unprecedented in modern history" and "The United States should not provide military assistance to any country that interferes with U.S. humanitarian assistance." They cited the 1961 Foreign Assistance Act, which states that "no assistance" shall be provided under that law or the Arms Export Control Act to any country that restricts, directly or indirectly, the transport or delivery of U.S. humanitarian assistance. "Stopping American humanitarian aid is in violation of the law. That should be clear. No more money to Netanyahu's war machine to kill Palestinian children," Sanders said.

British complicity

See also: British support for Israel in the Israel–Hamas war

Protestor holding a sign claiming the UK Labour Party leader Keir Starmer supports genocide

On 12 December 2023, Human Rights Watch said that selling weapons to Israel could make the UK complicit in war crimes. UK law says that licences cannot be granted where there is a clear risk that the items might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law, for example a complete siege of Gaza or indiscriminate shelling of civilians. The human rights groups Al-Haq and Global Legal Action Network have applied for judicial review of the government's export licences for the sale of British weapons capable of being used in Israel's action in Gaza. Additionally, James Denselow, Head of Conflict and Humanitarian at Save the Children UK, said, "By failing to push for a permanent end to the fighting or speak out against the weaponization of aid, Rishi Sunak and his government are complicit in the horror that is unfolding." In December, Scottish First Minister Humza Yousaf condemned the UK's abstention from a draft UN resolution calling for a ceasefire in Gaza, saying this would lead to the deaths of more children.

In March 2024, Foreign Affairs Select Committee chair Alicia Kearns said that the government had ignored and refused to publish advice from Foreign Office lawyers that Israel was breaking humanitarian law.

In April 2024, Guy Goodwin-Gill said: "There is a serious risk of genocide, as the International Court of Justice has found. If the UK, with that knowledge in mind, carries on exporting arms to Israel, there is a risk that those arms will be used in the conduct of aggressive activities and in the conduct of genocide." The same month, more than 600 lawyers and legal academics, including Jonathan Sumption and Brenda Hale, published a legal opinion warning that the government risked complicity in genocide by continuing to arm Israel. The opinion was eventually signed by 1,101 lawyers.

On 2 September 2024, British foreign secretary David Lammy announced that the UK was suspending approximately 30 arms export licenses, including aircraft and drone components, to Israel after a government review concluded that there was a high risk that these exports were being used for severe violations of international humanitarian law. At the time of the suspension, Israel had around 350 arms export licenses in the UK.

German complicity

Demonstration in Frankfurt, where demonstrators are holding a banner that reads: "Stop the criminalisation of Palestinian resistance and solidarity"

In October 2023, political analyst Lena Obermaier argued that Germany is complicit in Israel's war crimes against Gaza. She detailed how most of Germany's most prominent news outlets have "been silent on Israeli genocidal policies in the past" and still are. She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany as evidence of state complicity. In February 2024, a criminal complaint was filed in German courts accusing various senior politicians of complicity in genocide. In March, Nicaragua sued Germany for complicity at the ICJ.

Cultural discourse

Various public figures have said Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, including Kid Cudi, Macklemore, and Summer Walker. Melissa Barrera was fired from the Scream franchise for reposting on social media an article accusing Israel of genocide. Time mentioned Barrera's firing in the context of a "growing divide" within Hollywood over the war. Raz Segal's "textbook genocide" verdict has been quoted approvingly by climate activist Greta Thunberg and BBC football presenter Gary Lineker.

In December 2023, Olly Alexander, who represented the United Kingdom at the Eurovision Song Contest 2024, signed a letter by the LGBT association Voices4London that accuses Israel of genocide against the Palestinians. The Israeli government and the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) condemned his views and asked the BBC not to allow him to perform at the contest. The BBC rejected Israel's request to cut ties with Alexander over his views.

When asked whether what is happening in Gaza is a genocide, Russian-American author Masha Gessen said, "I think there are some fine distinctions between genocide and ethnic cleansing and I think that there are valid arguments for using both terms." When pressed further, they said, "it is at the very least ethnic cleansing". Controversy surrounded Gessen's reception of the Hannah Arendt Prize over remarks in a New Yorker article critical of Israeli actions in Gaza in which Gessen compared them to Nazis liquidating an Eastern European ghetto.

At the 96th Academy Awards, after accepting the award for Best International Feature Film for The Zone of Interest, Jonathan Glazer drew parallels between the depiction of the Holocaust in his film and Israel's ongoing bombardment and siege of Gaza. Journalist Naomi Klein expanded on the parallels between Gaza and the film's depiction of the Holocaust, highlighting the normalisation of genocidal action.

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala Yousafzai said: "When we see alarming signs of genocide, we cannot wait to take decisive action. We must work together to urge our leaders to stop these war crimes and hold perpetrators to account." Nobel Peace Prize winner Tawakkol Karman stated, "The world is silent in front of the genocide and the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people in Gaza."

Media discourse

The case against Israel in the ICJ has drawn some criticism from publications and individuals who argue that claims that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza cheapen the term and undermine its serious nature as defined by the UN Genocide Convention.

In January 2024, The Economist argued that South Africa's charge of genocide against Israel at the ICJ weakens the legal definition of genocide and diverts focus from the actual humanitarian crisis in Gaza, calling it "a mockery of the ICJ". It emphasized that Israel's actions, while destructive, are aimed at Hamas militants rather than targeting Palestinians for their ethnicity. The article criticized South Africa's legal case as politically motivated, warning that such claims undermine genuine efforts to prevent genocide. It added that the court's potential rulings could overshadow legitimate concerns about breaches of international war laws. "Genocide requires that Israel is killing people in Gaza simply for being Palestinian", The Economist wrote, adding that Israel is instead targeting Hamas fighters.

In a 12 January 2024 National Public Radio interview, former US ambassador for war-crimes issues David Scheffer acknowledged Israeli war crimes in Gaza and claimed that Israel was not committing genocide but "responding to a genocidal act in order to prevent further genocide against Israel". Writing for The Times of Israel, Jeremy Sharon claimed that Israel's actions are defensive responses to Hamas, characterizing calls for Gaza's destruction and other statements by Israeli officials (later found by the ICJ to be "incitement to genocide") as "intemperate comments of some of its political leaders". Meanwhile, writer Susan Abulhawa wrote about going to Gaza, stating, "Israel is committing the holocaust of our time."

Israeli media outlets like Channel 12 and Channel 14 have been accused of incitement to genocide. In September 2024, Zulat for Equality and Human Rights and two other Israeli organizations compiled a list of statements made on Channel 14, which included over 50 advocating for genocide against Palestinians and more than 150 calling for or supporting war crimes and crimes against humanity, including ethnic cleansing, mass expulsion and the use of starvation as a weapon of war, and submitted it to Israel's Attorney General. The channel frequently referred to Gazan civilians as terrorists and legitimate targets in its broadcasts and on social media, with its website displaying a statistic labeled "the number of terrorists we've eliminated", reflecting the total number of Palestinians reported killed by Gaza's Health Ministry. Shimon Riklin, a Channel 14 journalist and anchor, publicly advocated for Israel to commit more war crimes. This rhetoric has been referenced in South Africa's genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.

Various, mainly western, media and news outlets have been accused of complicity in genocide against Gaza through media imperialism. Others have situated the biases of western media outlets within a long history of downplaying and excusing the oppression of Palestinians. According to a report published by the Centre for Media Monitoring analysing the language used in coverage of the Israeli assault on Gaza, "occupied territories" appeared more often in Al Jazeera English's coverage than in all U.S. or U.K. news outlets combined, and that emotive language was 11 times more likely to be used in descriptions of Israeli victims than of Palestinian victims. On 14 March 2024, protesters blocked access to the offices of The New York Times, accusing the paper of complicity in genocide. Sultany highlights that, despite a preponderance of Israeli statements that amount to incitement to genocide, mainstream commentary has portrayed the destruction of Gaza as "an incidental outcome of urban warfare rather than the predictable outcome of a policy".

Israeli public opinion

A Tel Aviv University poll of 502 Israeli Jews conducted during the second week of January 2024 found that 51% believed the IDF was using an appropriate amount of force in Gaza and 43% believed it was not using enough force. In an Israel Democracy Institute survey of 510 Israeli citizens in early February, 68% of respondents supported preventing all international aid from entering Gaza.

In an interview with The New Statesman, the Israeli journalist and author Gideon Levy, a former aide and spokesman for Shimon Peres and longstanding writer for Ha'aretz who has reported on Israel's settlement policy for 35 years, said: "Israel is deteriorating horribly. The most important thing, and you mentioned it, is how unanimous it is. It's not only the right-wingers. You cannot even show some empathy to Gaza, to the suffering of Gaza, which Israel doesn't see at all. The average Israeli saw nothing [of what has unfolded in] Gaza, only the soldiers there see it. The bravery, the sacrifice, the hostages and families, this is shown nonstop, but not a single image of the suffering of two million people in Gaza. I think it's the darkest time of Israel, maybe ever."

See also

• Israeli war crimes in the Israel–Hamas war
• Allegations of genocide in the 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon
• Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel
• Animal stereotypes of Palestinians in Israeli discourse
• Gaza Strip mass graves
• Human rights violations against Palestinians by Israel
• Israeli Generals' Plan
• Racism in Israel
• Sexual and gender-based violence against Palestinians during the Israel–Hamas war

References

Works cited

• Abraham, Yuval (3 April 2024). "'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza". +972 Magazine. Archived from the original on 10 October 2024. Retrieved 29 October 2024.
• Albanese, Francesca (25 March 2024). "Anatomy of a Genocide" (PDF). United Nations Special Rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories.
• Antonio, Raymund (23 October 2023). "Civilians not a target: Envoy decries 'genocide' tag of Israel–Hamas war". Manila Bulletin. Archived from the original on 1 November 2023. Retrieved 1 November 2023. Israeli Ambassador to the Philippines Ilan Fluss rejected the notion that his country is committing genocide in Gaza City, where a two-week war has erupted ... their measures were targeting Hamas members, and they were 'taking all measures to avoid having civilians affected" by attacks. 'We are informing civilians even before attacks: keep away from Hamas' infrastructure and Hamas' facilities,' ... Hamas attacked Israel on Oct. 7, and killed at least 1,400 people, mostly civilians.
• "Israeli offensive shifts to crowded southern Gaza, driving up death toll despite evacuation orders". Associated Press. 2 December 2023. Archived from the original on 16 December 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2023.
• Assi, Seraj (20 February 2024). "Lula Is Right About Israel's Genocide in Gaza". Jacobin. Archived from the original on 25 February 2024.
• Bartov, Omer (10 November 2023). "Opinion | What I Believe as a Historian of Genocide". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 16 December 2023.
• Beaklini, Bruno Lima Rocha (25 October 2023). "'War propaganda' - Brazil's media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza". Al Jazeera Media Institute. Archived from the original on 4 November 2023. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
• Bishara, Marwan (12 October 2023). "Israel is manufacturing a case for genocide". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 20 November 2023. Retrieved 12 October 2023.
• Burga, Solcyré (13 November 2023). "Is What's Happening in Gaza a Genocide? Experts Weigh In". Time. Archived from the original on 25 November 2023. Retrieved 24 November 2023.
• "Hundreds dead as war erupts after surprise Hamas attack catches Israel off guard". CBC. Associated Press. 7 October 2023. Archived from the original on 10 January 2024.
• Chacar, Henriette (10 November 2023). "Israel revises Hamas attack death toll to 'around 1,200'". Reuters. Archived from the original on 11 November 2023.
• Conley, Julia (3 January 2024b). "100+ Global Rights Groups Urge Support for South Africa's Genocide Case Against Israel at ICJ". Common Dreams. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2024.
• Corder, Mike (2 January 2024). "South Africa's genocide case against Israel sets up a high-stakes legal battle at the UN's top court". ABC News. Archived from the original on 7 January 2024. Retrieved 3 January 2024.
• Di-Capua, Yoav (5 June 2024). "Genocidal Mirroring in Israel/Palestine". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–15. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2361978.
• Donoghue, Joan (25 April 2024). "Joan Donoghue – Former President of the International Court of Justice". HARDtalk (Interview). Interviewed by Stephen Sackur. BBC. Retrieved 5 July 2024.
• Doucet, Lyse (9 March 2024). "Israel abused Gaza war detainees, UN report alleges". BBC News. Archived from the original on 13 March 2024.
• El-Affendi, Abdelwahab (18 January 2024). "The Futility of Genocide Studies After Gaza". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–7. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2305525.
• "Nearly 25,000 Palestinians killed during 70-day Israeli genocide in Gaza". Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor. 15 December 2023. Archived from the original on 20 December 2023. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
• Fassin, Didier (5 February 2024). "The Rhetoric of Denial: Contribution to an Archive of the Debate about Mass Violence in Gaza". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–7. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2308941.
• Graham-Harrison, Emma; Kierszenbaum, Quique (3 January 2024). "Israeli public figures accuse judiciary of ignoring incitement to genocide in Gaza". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 28 January 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2024.
• "World Court to hear Genocide Case Against Israel". Human Rights Watch. 10 January 2024. Archived from the original on 10 January 2024. Retrieved 10 January 2024.
• Jamshidi, Maryam (6 May 2024). "Genocide and Resistance in Palestine under Law's Shadow". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–35. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2348377.
• Jimoh, Abdullahi (4 January 2024). "Over 100 Global Organisations Rally for South Africa's Genocide Case Against Israel at ICJ". News Central TV. Archived from the original on 6 January 2024. Retrieved 6 January 2024.
• Johnson, Jake (18 October 2023). "800+ Legal Scholars Say Israel May Be Perpetrating 'Crime of Genocide' in Gaza". Common Dreams. Archived from the original on 22 November 2023. Retrieved 24 November 2023.
• Jones, Owen (13 January 2024). "The brutality and inhumanity of Israel's assault on Gaza is no surprise. It's just what was promised". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 January 2024.
• Khan, Mishal S.; Tinua, Alu Tacon (16 February 2024). "Israel–Palestine: dehumanisation and silencing". The Lancet. 403 (10429): 805–806. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00043-6. PMID 38373433.
• Khatib, Rasha; McKee, Martin; Yusuf, Salim (5 July 2024). "Counting the dead in Gaza: difficult but essential". The Lancet. 404 (10449). Elsevier BV: 237–238. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)01169-3. ISSN 0140-6736. PMID 38976995.
• Kottasová, Ivana; Salman, Abeer; Alkhaldi, Celine; Bashir, Nada; Khadder, Kareem (6 November 2023). "Gaza workers expelled from Israel accuse Israeli authorities of abuse, including beatings". WRAL-TV. Archived from the original on 2 February 2024. Retrieved 2 February 2024.
• Lederman, Shmuel (29 January 2024). "Gaza as a Laboratory 2.0". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–6. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2309706.
• Levene, Mark (21 January 2024). "Gaza 2023: Words Matter, Lives Matter More" (PDF). Journal of Genocide Research (Forum: Israel–Palestine: Atrocity Crimes and the Crisis of Holocaust and Genocide Studies): 1–7. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2301866. eISSN 1469-9494. Archived from the original on 4 July 2024.
• Litvin, Yoav (21 December 2023). "The anatomy of Zionist genocide". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 24 February 2024.
• Mackenzie, James; Lubell, Maayan (29 October 2023). "Israel launches Gaza war's second phase with ground operation, Netanyahu says". Reuters. Archived from the original on 29 October 2023. Retrieved 1 November 2023. Israel has tightened its blockade on and bombarded Gaza for three weeks after the Islamist group Hamas' Oct. 7 assault killed 1,400 Israelis ... Abbas ... said, 'Our people in the Gaza Strip are facing a war of genocide and massacres committed by the Israeli occupation forces in full view of the entire world.'
• Masarwa, Lubna; Osman, Nadda (3 November 2023). "Palestinian workers from Gaza describe torture and abuse in Israeli detention". Middle East Eye. Archived from the original on 2 February 2024. Retrieved 2 February 2024.
• McDoom, Omar Shahabudin (25 April 2024). "Expert Commentary, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, and the Question of Genocide: Prosemitic Bias within a Scholarly Community?". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–9. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2346403.
• "Cuba apoya la demanda de Sudáfrica ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia contra el genocidio de Israel en Palestina" [Cuba supports South Africa's lawsuit before the International Court of Justice against Israel's genocide in Palestine] (in Spanish). Cuba Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 11 January 2024. Archived from the original on 11 January 2024.
• Narea, Nicole; Samuel, Sigal (13 November 2023). "How to think through allegations of genocide in Gaza". Vox. Archived from the original on 24 November 2023. Retrieved 24 November 2023.
• Nichols, Michelle (11 October 2023). "Palestinian UN envoy accuses Israel of 'genocidal' campaign against Gaza". Reuters News. Archived from the original on 14 November 2023. Retrieved 13 October 2023.
• Obermaier, Lena (23 October 2023). "Germany Is Complicit in Israel's War Crimes in Gaza". Jacobin. Archived from the original on 1 March 2024.
• Order of 26 January 2024 (PDF), Application of Convention on Prevention and Punishment of Crime of Genocide (S. Afr. v. Isr.), No. 192 (ICJ 26 January 2024), archived from the original on 13 February 2024.
• "South Africa's ICJ Case Against Israel Backed by Over 1,000 Organizations". The Palestine Chronicle. 10 January 2024. Archived from the original on 12 January 2024. Retrieved 13 January 2024.
• Porras, Simón Rodríguez (25 October 2023). "Aimé Césaire reminds us why Western powers accept the genocide committed in Gaza". The New Arab. Archived from the original on 17 January 2024.
• "Public Statement: Scholars Warn of Potential Genocide in Gaza" (Press release). Third World Approaches to International Law Review. 20 October 2023 [Statement released 15 October 2023]. Archived from the original on 23 November 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
• Quigley, John (3 July 2024). "The Lancet and Genocide By "Slow Death" in Gaza". Arab Center Washington DC. Archived from the original on 13 July 2024. Retrieved 13 July 2024.
• Qutami, Loubna (2023). "A Feminist Practice of Bearing Witness to Genocide". Feminist Studies. 49 (2): 531–533. doi:10.1353/fem.2023.a915923. S2CID 266441159.
• Samudzi, Zoé (18 January 2024). ""We are Fighting Nazis": Genocidal Fashionings of Gaza(ns) After 7 October". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–9. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2305524.
• Saric, Ivana (8 November 2024). "Nearly 70% of verified deaths in Gaza are women and children, UN report finds". Axios.
• Sathar, M. A. (December 2023). "The war on Gaza. A test of our humanity". South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 16 (3): 82–83. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.2023.v16i3.1734.
• Sawafta, Ali; Fick, Maggie (7 December 2023). "How many Palestinians have died in Gaza? Death toll explained". Reuters. Archived from the original on 12 December 2023. Retrieved 8 December 2023.
• Scahill, Jeremy; Grim, Ryan (15 April 2024). "Leaked NYT Gaza memo tells journalists to avoid words "genocide," "ethnic cleansing," and "occupied territory"". The Intercept. Archived from the original on 16 April 2024. Retrieved 16 April 2024.
• Segal, Raz (13 October 2023). "A Textbook Case of Genocide". Jewish Currents. Archived from the original on 25 November 2023. Retrieved 19 October 2023.
• Segal, Raz; Daniele, Luigi (5 March 2024). "Gaza as Twilight of Israel Exceptionalism: Holocaust and Genocide Studies from Unprecedented Crisis to Unprecedented Change". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–10. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2325804.
• Semerdjian, Elyse (24 January 2024). "A World Without Civilians". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–6. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2306714.
• Semerdjian, Elyse (17 July 2024). "Gazafication and Genocide by Attrition in Artsakh/Nagorno Karabakh and the Occupied Palestinian Territories". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–22. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2377871.
• Shamim, Sarah (11 January 2024). "Which countries back South Africa's genocide case against Israel at ICJ?". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 26 January 2024. Retrieved 12 January 2024.
• Shaw, Martin (3 January 2024). "Inescapably Genocidal". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–5. doi:10.1080/14623528.2023.2300555. S2CID 266778978.
• Smith, Mitch; McCarthy, Lauren; Londoño, Ernesto; Jordan, Miriam (12 October 2023). "Palestinian Americans, Dismayed by Violence, Say Historical Context Is Being Overlooked". The New York Times. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 12 November 2023. Retrieved 12 October 2023.
• Soni, S. (December 2023). "Gaza and international law: The global obligation to protect life and health". South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 16 (3): 80–81. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.2023.v16i3.1764.
• Speakman Cordall, Simon; Pedrosa, Veronica (13 March 2024). "Not just the UNRWA report: Countless accounts of Israeli torture in Gaza". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 14 March 2024.
• Stacey, Diego (4 November 2023). "Pedro Arrojo, UN Special Rapporteur: 'The Gaza war is heading towards genocide'". El País. Archived from the original on 8 November 2023.
• Sultany, Nimer (9 May 2024). "A Threshold Crossed: On Genocidal Intent and the Duty to Prevent Genocide in Palestine". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–26. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2351261.
• Tanielian, Melanie S. (5 February 2024). "The Silent Slow Killer of Famine: Humanitarian Management and Permanent Security". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–9. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2310866.
• Thomas, Merlyn (21 December 2023). "Israel Gaza: What Gaza's death toll says about the war". BBC News. BBC Verify. Archived from the original on 24 December 2023. Retrieved 25 December 2023.
• Traverso, Enzo (2024). Gaza Faces History. Other Press. ISBN 978-1-63542-555-0.
• Üngör, Uğur Ümit (26 January 2024). "Screaming, Silence, and Mass Violence in Israel/Palestine". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–9. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2309709.
• International human rights clinic, Boston University School of Law; International human rights clinic, Cornell Law School; Centre for human rights, University of Pretoria; Lowenstein human rights project, Yale Law School (15 May 2024). Genocide in Gaza: Analysis of international law and its application to Israel's military actions since October 7, 2023 (PDF) (Report). University Network for Human Rights. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 May 2024.
• Wells, Karen; Cortés-Morales, Susana; Esson, James; Horgan, Deirdre; Nxumalo, Fikile; Phoenix, Ann; Rautio, Paulina; Rosen, Rachel (20 February 2024). "Israel's war on Gaza and the violation of children's rights". Children's Geographies. 22 (2): 197–200. doi:10.1080/14733285.2024.2316752.

Further reading

• Abdo, Nahla (2024). "Israel's settler colonialism and the genocide in Gaza: Alternatives". Studies in Political Economy. 105 (1): 94–106. doi:10.1080/07078552.2024.2325298.
• Agha, Zena; Esson, James; Griffiths, Mark; Joronen, Mikko (5 February 2024). "Gaza: A decolonial geography". Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 49 (2): e12675. Bibcode:2024TrIBG..49E2675A. doi:10.1111/tran.12675.
• Alexander, Atul (22 February 2024). "Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel) at the International Court of Justice". Chinese Journal of International Law. 23 (1): 185–190. doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmae004.
• Audeh, Ida (March–April 2024). "Solidarity During a Time of Genocide: Why Gaza Matters". Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. pp. 8–10.
• Ferguson, Rob (19 December 2023). "Israel's roadmap to genocide". International Socialism (181).
• "Genocide in Gaza: The Ongoing Nakba". Al-Muntaqa: New Perspectives on Arab Studies. 7 (1). Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies. January–February 2024. JSTOR e48516260.
• Gostin, Lawrence O.; Goodwin, Michael B. (13 March 2024). "International Humanitarian Law in the Israeli-Gaza Conflict—Reply". JAMA. 331 (15): 1330. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.4426. PMID 38477944.
• Kels, Charles G. (13 March 2024). "International Humanitarian Law in the Israeli-Gaza Conflict". JAMA. 331 (15): 1329. doi:10.1001/jama.2024.4432. PMID 38477929.
• Lloyd, Genevieve (20 February 2024). "Seeing Gaza: Objectivity and Emotion". Bioethical Inquiry. doi:10.1007/s11673-024-10362-y. PMID 38777968.
• Manduca, Paolo; Rothchild, Alice; Meyers, Alan (18 January 2024). "On the duty to protect the people of Gaza: how the collapse of the hospital health care system has reinforced genocidal intent". Journal of Public Health and Emergency. 8: 20. doi:10.21037/jphe-24-11.
• Moses, Jeremy (16 February 2024). "Gaza and the Political and Moral Failure of the Responsibility to Protect". Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding. 18 (2): 211–215. doi:10.1080/17502977.2024.2304987.
• Nagarajan, Nithya (10 April 2024). "Intervention – On Solidarity: Responses of European Labor to the Gaza Genocide". Antipode.
• Safi, Shahd (January–February 2024). "Life During a Genocide in Gaza". Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. pp. 20–21.
• Soni, S. (May 2024). "The anatomy of a genocide – a watershed moment as international law and our common humanity hangs by a thread". South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 17 (2): e2218. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.2024.v17i2.2218.
• Sprusansky, Dale (January–February 2024). "Holocaust Scholars Say Israel is Committing Genocide". Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. p. 52.
• Stein, Rebecca L. (22 March 2024). "Intervention – Vanishing Acts: How the Israeli Media Manages Gaza". Antipode.
• Wispelwey, Bram; Mills, David; Asi, Yara M.; Hammoudeh, Weeam; Kunichoff, Dennis; Ahmed, A. Kayum (16 May 2024). "Civilian mortality and damage to medical facilities in Gaza". BMJ. 9 (5): e014756. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014756. PMC 11103200. PMID 38760024.
• Roundtable Artsakh/Nagorno Karabakh: Famine, Memory and The Question of Genocide in Journal of Genocide Research:
  • Aharon, Eldad Ben (27 September 2024). "Israel's Foreign Policy and the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: A Reflection on Regional Security and Diplomacy". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–23. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2406100.
• Roundtable Gaza: International Humanitarian Law and Genocide in Journal of Genocide Research:
  • Ben-Naftali, Orna; Diamond, Eitan; Shofty, Aner (25 October 2024). "Esprit de Corpse: Genocide in the Shadowland of Gaza?". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–22. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2418670.
• Roundtable Israel-Palestine: Atrocity Crimes and the Crisis of Holocaust and Genocide Studies in Journal of Genocide Research:
  • Boisen, Camilla (26 September 2024). "Israel's Punitive War on Palestinians in Gaza". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–22. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2406098.
  • Goldberg, Amos (15 October 2024). "The Problematic Return of Intent". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–10. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2413175.
  • Lapidot, Elad (7 August 2024). "Logos and Extermination". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–10. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2387898.
  • Mhajne, Anwar (30 May 2024). "Understanding Sexual Violence Debates Since 7 October: Weaponization and Denial". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–19. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2359851.
  • Whyte, Jessica (17 April 2024). "A "Tragic Humanitarian Crisis": Israel's Weaponization of Starvation and the Question of Intent". Journal of Genocide Research: 1–15. doi:10.1080/14623528.2024.2339637.

External links

• "UN panel discussion: 2023 War on Gaza: The Responsibility to Prevent Genocide". United Nations. 12 December 2023.