Jump to content

User:Nancy/Desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

desk


Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Sennecaster 214 0 0 100 Open 17:20, 25 December 2024 1 day, 22 hours no report
Admin statistics
Action Count
Edits 21366
Edits+Deleted 25360
Pages deleted 15561
Revisions deleted 6
Pages restored 118
Pages protected 417
Pages unprotected 21
Protections modified 16
Users blocked 1248
Users reblocked 27
Users unblocked 18
User rights modified 13
Users created 1


Purge the cache of this page


commenting template

Result Shorthand Longhand
Checking: :{{AIV|chk}} :{{AIV|check}}
wait :{{AIV|wt|Z}} :{{AIV|wait|Z}}
Warned user. :{{AIV|w}} :{{AIV|warn}}
Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. :{{AIV|i}} :{{AIV|ins}}
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. :{{AIV|f}} :{{AIV|nfw}}
Stale warning. Last warning was issued Y ago. :{{AIV|ow|Y}} :{{AIV|oldwarn|Y}}
Will actively monitor user. :{{AIV|m}} :{{AIV|monitor}}
Question: :{{AIV|q}} :{{AIV|ques}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. :{{AIV|a}} :{{AIV|ani}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Usernames for administrator attention. :{{AIV|u}} :{{AIV|uaa}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Requests for page protection. :{{AIV|r}} :{{AIV|rpp}}
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. :{{AIV|sp}} :{{AIV|ssp}}
Note: :{{AIV|n}} :{{AIV|note}}
Note: IP addresses are generally not blocked indefinitely. Please see the blocking policy for more information. :{{AIV|in}} :{{AIV|indef}}
Appears to be a shared IP address, used by multiple users. :{{AIV|s}} :{{AIV|shared}}
User has been inappropriately warned. 4im warnings are appropriate for severe vandalism and defamation only. :{{AIV|4im}} :{{AIV|onlywarn}}
Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution. :{{AIV|c}} :{{AIV|cont}}
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. :{{AIV|ns}} :{{AIV|new}}
Blocks are preventative, not intended to be used as punishment. :{{AIV|np}} :{{AIV|notpunish}}
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. :{{AIV|nv}} :{{AIV|notvandal}}
Page deleted. :{{AIV|d}} :{{AIV|del}}
Stale report. User has not edited in X. :{{AIV|e|X}} :{{AIV|stale|X}}
Report was good at the time, but is now stale. (X since last edit) Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. :{{AIV|sn|X}} :{{AIV|nowstale|X}}
merge :{{AIV|me}} :{{AIV|merge}}


Reports

User-reported

I have deleted the user page. If he recreates it, then he would be blockable. For now, I don't think a block is required. PhilKnight (talk) 18:23, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested -1
Empty articles 1
Nonsense pages -3
Spam pages 1
Notability not asserted 0

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for at least 5 days:
( source / chronological order )

Usernames for administrator attention

commenting template

Result Shorthand Longhand
Wait until the user edits. :{{UAA|wt}} :{{UAA|wait}}
Being discussed with the user. :{{UAA|d}} :{{UAA|disc}}
drfcn :{{UAA|dr}} :{{UAA|drfcn}}
aiv :{{UAA|v}} :{{UAA|aiv}}
ani :{{UAA|a}} :{{UAA|ani}}
rpp :{{UAA|r}} :{{UAA|rpp}}
ssp :{{UAA|sp}} :{{UAA|ssp}}
talk :{{UAA|uw}} :{{UAA|talk}}
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. :{{UAA|rc}} :{{UAA|rfcn}}
notb :{{UAA|b}} :{{UAA|notb}}
Question: :{{UAA|q}} :{{UAA|question}}
Note: :{{UAA|n}} :{{UAA|note}}
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2–3 weeks. :{{UAA|e}} :{{UAA|stale}}
merge :{{UAA|me}} :{{UAA|merge}}


User-reported

Requests for page protection

commenting template

Result Code Normalized code
Semi-protected {{RFPP|s}} {{RFPP|semi}}
Fully protected {{RFPP|p}} {{RFPP|full}}
Move protected {{RFPP|m}} {{RFPP|move}}
Creation protected {{RFPP|t}} {{RFPP|salt}}
Done {{RFPP|do}} {{RFPP|done}}
Declined {{RFPP|d}} {{RFPP|deny}}
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. {{RFPP|nea}} {{RFPP|nact}}
DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. {{RFPP|np}} {{RFPP|npre}}
{{RFPP|fa}} {{RFPP|mpfa}}
User(s) blocked. {{RFPP|b}} {{RFPP|bloc}}
Unprotected {{RFPP|u}} {{RFPP|unpr}}
Not unprotected {{RFPP|nu}} {{RFPP|noun}}
Already unprotected. {{RFPP|au}} {{RFPP|isun}}
Already protected. {{RFPP|ap}} {{RFPP|ispr}}
Already done. {{RFPP|ad}} {{RFPP|isdo}}
Question: {{RFPP|q}} {{RFPP|ques}}
Note: {{RFPP|n}} {{RFPP|note}}


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Reason: People have re-ordered the ranking of Barbie versus The Super Mario Bros. Movie, adjusted the gross numbers for various movies so that they're inconsistent with all of:

  • The Numbers
  • Box Office Mojo
  • the mean of the two figures reported by those sources, and/or
  • the Wikipedia pages

and removed the Chinese movies from the list entirely.

Clearly this is vandalism. Vonvorx (talk) 07:30, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Vbbanaz05 (talk) 09:29, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Edit war initiated by IP user BlameRuiner (talk) 12:46, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: WP:ARBPIA Isi96 (talk) 14:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

DeclinedPages are not protected preemptively. No edits this month. El_C 14:27, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: IPs repeatedly putting large test edits on the talkpage. The Banner talk 14:16, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism: Edit war initiated by IP user. Astro Alpha Plus (talk) 14:43, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – This pagen needs protection. It's PP only expired recently, and it's the target of intermittent disruptive editing. Noorullah (talk) 16:42, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:17, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The only talk page activity in the past year has been an IP range posting nonsense, continuing from a different IP when blocked for it. Belbury (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:12, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – The only talk page activity in the past year has been an IP range posting nonsense, continuing from a different IP when blocked for it. Belbury (talk) 16:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:11, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP users vandalizing page despite two temporary semi-protections. this has gone too far, and as a result, must be protected indef this time. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talkcontribs) 17:07, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato 🏳‍🌈 17:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary Semi-Protection: Persistent in Additional of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Mas Menos 28 (talk) 17:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruption by a variety of IPs and new accounts over the last few days. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Andrew5 is likely back at it again. 152.179.137.198 (talk) 18:26, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason: Protection is too high and it was for sockpuppetry in 2018. It's nearly 2025 now so if it needs protecting just do pending changes or semi-protection but unprotection would be better I think. 147.10.234.99 (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging protecting admin User:Ponyo, who might or might not wish to have input. I looked at the history of disruption and it looks pretty bad. I'm inclined to give semi protection a shot (this would eliminate 95% of the disruption in page history), but I'd rather hear from the sysop who made the call first. BusterD (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


Change 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[43] to 16,000 civilians (May 2024)[42]

Source 42 has these numbers and source 43 doesn't Alderman pained dios finnish (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Hayden Panettiere artricle: Joe Somebody (2001) with Tim Allen

Why have you unreverted my revision on the Hayden Panettiere artricle by removing Joe Somebody (2001) with Tim Allen? 86.130.33.243 (talk) 22:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Soetermans:. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.


WP:RFPERM (rollback)

Rollback

I have been reverting vandalism since I created my account. Although it appears I am a new user, I also have experience editing Wikipedia and reverting vandalism as an IP for many years (which I will not be disclosing due to security concerns). The rollback right will help me revert vandalism faster, which is why I am requesting it. PersonAccount 🐉 (talk) 20:08, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

PersonAccount, to be honest, no, it doesn't appear you are a new user. Which is okay if all previous activity was without having an account and without disruption. It will take longer than for other users until the trust for manually granting permissions is there in your case. It isn't yet, to me. Unless someone else grants rollback in the next week or so, I'll decline this with a recommendation not to ask for permissions until your account is a year old. Regarding rollback in particular, Twinkle and Ultraviolet will do just fine. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request rollback rights to combat vandalism more efficiently. I am an experienced recent changes patroller and I understand that the rollback should be used mainly for clear cases of vandalism. I am committed to using this tool responsibly. Nxcrypto Message 12:07, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a few months now. Rollback will help my work, especially when I'm out and about and can only access the app. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:28, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

I want to note that I am currently recieving CVU training on this page and am willing to apply again later if it is felt that I am not yet ready for this permission. I would also greatly appreciate any guidence (especially on that page). Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:47, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like rollback to help me combat vandalism more effectively. I currently use recent changes and RedWarn. I feel that I have the experience necessary to handle vandalism in a constructive manner. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Though I started out doing grammar fixes, over the past 2 weeks, I've been using Twinkle and RedWarn to revert any vandalism seen on Special:RecentChanges. It's understandable if you'd like to impose the hard and fast rule of 1-month experience, but I've made almost 300 edits related to vandalism. I always leave a message for the editor and undo my revert in cases where I question my decision in hindsight and would rather have another pair of eyes look at the edit(s).

Having the rollback permission would make RedWarn reverting faster for me and would also allow me to try out other anti-vandalism tools like Huggle. Could I have the right please? randomdude121 (leave a message!) 09:19, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

I view that having this user right would help in fighting vandalism a lot faster. I know I would be far more efficient with fighting vandalism if I were to be granted Rollback. I have been editing for over 7 months, and I have well over 5140 edits, with a focus on mitigating abuse on the wiki. I am a frequent contributor to AIV and RPP. Plasticwonder (talk) 18:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

I am requesting rollback rights to revert an edit by another user that merged Baroque Pinto with Friesian Sporthorse, without prior authorization or agreement, on 15 November 2024 - a higher-up editor or administrator previously denied a merge request due to "no consensus" in January 2024 - or allowing other users to discuss or dispute the page merge, as indicated for the procedure on Wikipedia: Merging. I have been trying to recover the Baroque Pinto page that was merged into Friesian Sporthorse without success, and need administrator assistance or intervention in order to revert or roll back the merge. Obversa (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

There are no outstanding requests for account creator.



23 December 2024