Jump to content

User talk:Peaceray

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a WikiGnome.
This user has AutoWikiBrowser permissions on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peaceray
home		Barnstars,
Badges, &
User Boxes		Talk to meNowhere, in
particular


My User Talk archives
Go to my current talk page
My subscriptions


Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Connecticut Colony on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Margaret Reid (politician) on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: October 2024

[edit]

Hi again. Last night, I tried to change the current Sydney Sweeney profile pic to another photo from her most recent event (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ana_de_Armas_and_Sydney_Sweeney_at_the_2024_Toronto_International_Film_Festival_03_(cropped).jpg), a substantially higher-quality close-up than the current profile pic. I then had this exchange with NoobThreePointOh: User talk:NoobThreePointOh/Archive 2#Sydney Sweeney profile pic. Would you possibly be able to grant the permission that he references in his last reply? Thank you very much. RangerFanAaron (talk) 23:33, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RangerFanAaron: I think there is some sensitivity as you twice switched out a high-quality image that highlighted Sweeney's face for a less recent upper body shot that emphasized her cleavage. As for File:Ana de Armas and Sydney Sweeney at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 03 (cropped).jpg, it is certainly not of higher quality than File:Ana de Armas and Sydney Sweeney at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 04 (Cropped).jpg as both were taken by Jay Dixit within a few minutes of each other last month at the Toronto International Film Festival.
Although I personally prefer the File:Ana de Armas and Sydney Sweeney at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 04 (Cropped).jpg version, I freely admit that it is a matter of preference. It is a bit early for WP:EDITCONSENSUS to apply, but since you have been reverted three times on these photo edits, I think it would be best if you read & take to heart the suggestions the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle has. Yes, the next step would be to open a discussion at Talk:Sydney Sweeney. Peaceray (talk) 00:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Peaceray: What I mean is, my picture is of much higher quality in that its resolution/clarity holds up at a much larger size - its file size is almost 5x larger than the current pic's, 1.64 MB versus the current pic being only 340 KB. RangerFanAaron (talk) 01:04, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RangerFanAaron: File:Ana de Armas and Sydney Sweeney at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 03 (cropped).jpg is 1,616 × 2,056 pixels at max & File:Ana de Armas and Sydney Sweeney at the 2024 Toronto International Film Festival 04 (Cropped).jpg is 1,242 × 1,864 pixels max. Most of the difference has to do with that 04 is more tightly cropped than 03, so really we are talking about a pretty negligible difference for an infobox picture that is going to a smaller resolution anyway. This thus becomes not an argument about resolution so much as how tightly one wants the picture cropped & whether one wants a smile. More editors seem to want the more tightly cropped picture with a smile.
You should make any further discussion on the article's talk page. Peaceray (talk) 04:15, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Our Admin Election Test

[edit]

Hello there. As we're preparing to move from one stage to the next, this is just a quick note from one member of the test group to another, wishing you well in the process of this new alternative to RfA. It seems that there are more of us in this group than some in the community anticipated, so i hope that doesn't make the experience any the worse for all of us. Whatever our individual results, i thank you, along with the rest, for stepping up and testing this process; happy days, ~ LindsayHello 07:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Hiallt

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hiallt, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Metformin

[edit]

Hi Peaceray, I’ve tried to reach out regarding the edits I made to the Metformin article. The article I’ve cited is from a peer-reviewed journal, which you can view here: https://academic.oup.com/ije/issue/51/6. Additionally, Peter Attia MD has reviewed this journal article and discussed its findings in detail: https://peterattiamd.com/a-recent-metformin-study-casts-doubts-on-longevity-indications/. Could you please explain how this doesn’t meet Wikipedia’s scholastic standards or WP? I’d like to ensure that my contributions align with Wikipedia's guidelines, and any feedback would be appreciated. 38.122.245.52 (talk) 15:16, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did not specify which article from the International Journal of Epidemiology journal you were citing, but based on your additions here & here, this is the article that you were referencing:
  • Keys, Matthew Thomas; Thinggaard, Mikael; Larsen, Lisbeth Aagaard; Pedersen, Dorthe Almind; Hallas, Jesper; Christensen, Kaare (2022-12-13). "Reassessing the evidence of a survival advantage in Type 2 diabetes treated with metformin compared with controls without diabetes: a retrospective cohort study". International Journal of Epidemiology. 51 (6): 1886–1898. doi:10.1093/ije/dyac200. PMID 36287641.
For medical articles, there are additional requirements for citations. One can find these requirements at WP:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (Shortcut: WP:MEDRS). The section that addresses the citation above is located at WP:MEDRS#Avoid primary sources. Keys et al is what is considered primary because it is a single clinical study. Since the annals of medicine are littered with single clinical studies that are contradictory & sometimes discredited, we look to secondary sources that evaluate multiple primary sources. As WP:MEDPRI states, A reason to avoid primary sources in the biomedical field – especially papers reporting results of in vitro experiments – is that they are often not replicable: references ommitted  (see also replication crisis) and are therefore unsuitable for use in generating encyclopedic, reliable biomedical content. This is the default position that editors who prolific edit medical topics thus take.
There is an exception, If conclusions are worth mentioning (such as large randomized clinical trials with surprising results), they should be described appropriately as from a single study. That is followed with the caveat If no reviews on the subject are published in a reasonable amount of time, then the content and primary source should be removed. Even though Keys et al was large (Singleton cohorts were derived from a 5% random sample of the Danish population recorded in the Civil Registration System (CRS) since 1968 and twin cohorts from all twin pairs recorded in the population-based Danish Twin Registry (DTR).), it was published 22 months ago & should have been evaluated by secondary sources by now.
Regarding the source that you posted here & here:
peterattiamd.com is self-published that can hardly be considered a scientific journal that can be used to summarize scientific consensus. This is clearly a case where WP:MEDRS is more stringent than WP:RS.
My advice to you would be to open a discussion on the talk page that includes the citation from Keys et al, a statement to the effect that this contradicts other studies in that it finds no evidence of a survival advantage or equalization through Metaformin operation, that it involved a large sample (again, Singleton cohorts were derived from a 5% random sample of the Danish population recorded in the Civil Registration System (CRS) since 1968 and twin cohorts from all twin pairs recorded in the population-based Danish Twin Registry (DTR).), & that you need assistance in finding this covered in systematic reviews, meta-analysis, & review articles. I would invite Bon courage using the {{ping}} template & invite others to the discussion by substituting a {{Please see}} template at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine. The syntax for that would be {{subst:Please see |location= Talk:Metaforin#<whatever you call your section heading>}}.
I hope this is helpful. Peaceray (talk) 16:58, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion on a page

[edit]

Hello @Peaceray,

I was wondering if I could get a spot check from you on a page that has a lot of bias being added to it. The Tanya Woo page has had a few people on both sides add in statements that are biased and unsourced, and I have been working to make sure its as fair and balanced as possible (especially during an election).

I have tried to integrate some of their sentiment were possible so that its not just all my voice in it, but some I have been just reverting and deleting all together. There has been a spike on the page view since ballots hit people's mailboxes, so I want to make sure they are reading a well source, unbiased page.

If there are glaring issues that you see, I am more than happy to make any edits. I am mainly looking for someone who has been doing this for awhile to give a thumbs up.

Let me know if you need anything from me.

Thanks. -- Bpuddin (talk) 16:49, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bpuddin: Hi, I am busy for the next several hours but will have a further look when I can. Meanwhile, please open a discussion at Talk:Tanya Woo. 18:08, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
@Bpuddin: Hi, I noticed that you did the last four edits, so I trust that you have set things right. Peaceray (talk) 20:27, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:North Creek (Washington)

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Peaceray. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:North Creek (Washington), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - October 2024 Newsletter

[edit]
This is our thirty-sixth newsletter. This issue has news related to SDG 3, 5, 13 and 15.

Orson Welles Sources Remain, With Content Removed

[edit]
Moved to Talk:Orson Welles § Orson Welles Sources Remain, With Content Removed
 – Peaceray (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Judy Nicastro on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Digital Eel logo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Digital Eel logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

[edit]
Here's your shirt

Congratulations, administrator Peaceray! ☆ Bri (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Congratulations! Earned and deserved! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:26, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: Thank you! Peaceray (talk) 03:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

[edit]

On your election as a new admin! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:54, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

🫡 Bluerasberry (talk) 20:21, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

+1 I had no doubt you would be among the Chosen! That you were validates the process! Daniel Case (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, Peaceray! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 21:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very pleased to see Wikipedia has gained an excellent administrator, congratulations! Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delighted to hear that you have gained the mop. OhanaUnitedTalk page 22:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bluerasberry, SuperHamster, Aoi, and OhanaUnited: Thank you! Peaceray (talk) 03:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bit late to the celebratory party (family funeral) but pleased as punch to say Congratulations and welcome to the mop club! --Rosiestep (talk) 17:25, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Rosiestep! Peaceray (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Admin Bâtonnets

[edit]
I may not be able to offer you the baton, but I hope you can savour these bâtonnets as you study all the new admin buttons! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Significa liberdade: Thank you! Peaceray (talk) 03:23, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

[edit]
Congrats on winning the adminship. Wikibear47 (talk) 01:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wikibear47: Thank you! Peaceray (talk) 03:24, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Soltan Hosayn Mirza Safavi on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"He who does not keep peace shall lose his hand."

[edit]
The axe of responsibility
Shiny new tools might be used to mete out justice, mercy or a dose of reality. Let us commit to not losing our cool when using them. Our only armor is the entire community's trust. We wear it for each other, each new contributor, and each new generation to come. May you ever be the community's champion.
BusterD (talk) 14:21, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the advice. I believe my contributions before becoming an administrator exhibit the qualities you mention above. I aspire to even handedness, an open mind, compassion, & a protection of Wikipedia within the guidance of its policies & regulations. On my candidacy page, Conlinp asked if I be willing to undergo recall if the community raised concerns about your conduct as an admin & I responded with an emphatic yes. Peaceray (talk) 17:32, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Admin baton :)

[edit]
The new admin baton
Congratulations on winning the admin election! DoubleGrazing passed the fabled baton to me and, and having given it a twirl or two, I am passing it on to you! Once you are done appreciating its magnificence, do pass it to the next admin. Happy mopping!
Best, -- Sohom (talk) 14:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Peaceray (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Friendly nudge to pass this BATON to FOARP :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 23:03, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done! Peaceray (talk) 23:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About your block of Vaibhav 2005

[edit]

You might want to make that indefinite; this edit to their user page indicates they are WP:NOTHERE.   –Skywatcher68 (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to being an administrator as of 2024-11-04. We will see if Vaibhav 2005 continues to vandalize once the 31 hours are up.
I have met a few experienced & valuable editors who have said that their first edit was vandalism. One of these became a Wikimedian of the Year. I am loathe to completely block someone indefinitely without giving them a second change. I know their are exceptions to that, but I take them on a case-by-case basis. Peaceray (talk) 18:09, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isetta

[edit]
Moved to Talk:Isetta § Was the Isetta manufactured or not in Argentina?
 – Peaceray (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 22 + 26: Free Culture Friday and Wikicurious photo event!

[edit]
November 22: Free Culture Friday

You are invited to Foundation and Friends' Free Culture Friday at Prime Produce on Friday, November 22. This event will feature a reception with Wikimedia Foundation staff in the afternoon, followed by a more informal salon and game night, utilizing Prime Produce's vast collection of board games. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!

  • Friday, November 22, 2024
    1:30 pm – 7:00 pm
    Prime Produce, 424 W 54th St
November 26: Wikicurious: Capturing the Moment
Jefferson Market Library

You are also invited to Wikicurious: Capturing the Moment, the third event of the beginner-focused Wikicurious series, at Jefferson Market Library on Tuesday, November 26, in collaboration with WikiPortraits and AfroCROWD. All are welcome to attend, especially those interested in photography or contributing to Wikimedia Commons. We will explore the art of capturing the moment through photography and learn the basics of Wikimedia Commons, and (weather-permitting) we are also planning a photo walk, so bring your camera (or use your smartphone)!

  • Tuesday, November 26, 2024
    3:00 pm – 8:00 pm
    Jefferson Market Library, 425 6th Ave
    RSVP on Eventbrite is required for event entry!
All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My home page.

[edit]

Good morning I am fairly new to Wikipedia and I was wondering if you could take a look at my user page and give some feedback on it and if all the information is alright. Some recommendations would also be appreciated. Thank you :D TocaTheFrog (talk) 10:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TocaTheFrog: Good Tuesday! There are a couple of things in the Wikitext of version of your user page that I think need tweaking. I would direct you to two resources first.
As per WP:UP#What may I have in my user pages?, your WP:User pages can be whatever you want it to be as long as it does not violate WP:UP#What may I not have in my user pages?. Note that if there is some CSS error, some user, or more likely a WP:BOT may come along & fix it.
Now that said, here are two things that I spotted, the first major, the second minor.
  1. Your headings are different from what MOS:GOODHEAD & MOS:SECTIONHEAD recommend for headings. For example, you used = '''<u>Who am I?</u>''' =[a] & == '''<u>Why am I here?</u>''' ==, whereas the preferred format for page headings would be ==Who am I?== & ==Why am I here?==.
  2. Try not to leave newlines between bullet headings. This creates an almost imperceptible greater spacing between *, but if you are using #, then it will restart your numbering sequence.
I hope this is helpful. Fell free to look at the wikitext of this section to see how I formatted things. Also, you can put any shortcut in the search bar to facilitate getting to the associated page. Peaceray (talk) 16:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

  1. ^ Note that although they are not visable, I am using the HTML code tag to format the code segments & the nowiki Wikitext tag to prevent the code from operating Wikitext formatting.

IP editing issues with an IP you previously blocked.

[edit]

Good evening to you, Peaceray. I seek your help with a matter concerning an IP you previously blocked, 141.154.49.21. Said IP has removed pertinent news from the Current Events section of the website earlier this evening. I responded by undoing that change, and their response is that they have reverted my change and informed me that "That is not at all how it works, Danegeld".

My change summary stated that "If it's here, then it's relevant." The news item was properly sourced, and I believe that the editor on the end of that change, may have been acting in bad faith, because the edit was about the recognition of the Palestinian state, by Canadian MPs.

I do not know what to do about this, and wondered if this could be (as the last block was set for), a contentious subject, and whether that block prevented the editor from making those changes. It is news, it is current and in my opinion it should be on that page.

Since this isn't the wiki I'm most used to editing, I'd like to ask for advice on how to handle this topic. I recognise it's not every user's "cup of tea", but if it is newsworthy enough that CBC broadcast it, then it's news, isn't it?

Sorry to tie up your talk with this topic, but I hope you can help. Thank you. Dane|Geld

23:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

  • The material should be restored & 141.154.49.21 warned with {{uw-ewsoft}} or {{uw-ew}}. It is incumbent upon the disagreeing editors then to try to bring the problem editor to talk pages. I emphasize the WP:BRD & WP:VNT essays (& it helps to mention that they are essays). It is important to work your way through the levels of warnings. Being warned via 1st, 2nd, 3rd, & 4th warnings is important when you are landing complaints on WP:AIV. Really, I should have insisted on it before initially blocking. I would also ask for advice at WP:ANI. I think it would be better to involve another administrator(s) at this point. Peaceray (talk) 05:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

[edit]

I have not named you, but this AN/I-case might be of interest for you: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents:Margaret Sanger & User:Anotherperson123. The Banner talk 14:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Subscriptions auto-archival

[edit]

It seems I have the serendipity of running into you again! I was looking through a maintenance category and noticed your subscriptions subpage wasn't archiving properly. The specific problem is the |archive= argument isn't set to a valid value. There are a few ways to fix it, but it depends on how you want it to work. If you want it to just create a separate page for every year, you can do the following:

Annual archive solution
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo          = old(366d)
| archive       = User talk:Peaceray/Subscriptions/Archive %(year)d
| archiveheader = {{Annual archive}}
}}

This will create each archive with the page title format "User talk:Peaceray/Subscriptions/Archive year" so that {{Annual archive}} will function as a header for each archive page that detects and lists all the years. Alternatively, if you just want to go the common route where you start counting from 1 and continue counting up from there:

Sequential solution
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo                = old(366d)
| archive             = User talk:Peaceray/Subscriptions/Archive %(counter)d
| counter             = 1
| maxarchivesize      = 150K
| archiveheader       = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft      = 4
}}

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis}} might also be another option, though I'm less familiar. Retro (talk | contribs) 07:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I have replaced the malfunctioning code with the Sequential solution. Peaceray (talk) 17:14, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPO and redaction at unblock request

[edit]

Hi, Peaceray, and congrats; didn't realize you just made admin! I noticed this edit at User talk:141.154.49.21 undoing declining a block appeal, after Fathoms Below pointed out the procedural issue involved. A self-revert is normally okay, but this went further than that. I believe in this case your edit was a violation of WP:TPO for two reasons: first, because your decline had already been responded to (namely, by FB), and secondly, because you not only self-reverted, but you removed another editor's comment (FB's), which is not permitted. (Ironically, the only user who could have legitimately removed FB's post is IP 141 themself, per WP:OWNTALK—but note that this does not also apply to the possibility of IP removing *your* post, which would have been excluded by the exception that forbids users from removing declined block appeals.) The way this should have been handled, imho, is that instead of removing your own post, you should have WP:REDACTed it by <s> striking it out </s>, and then <u> adding new, underlined comments </u> to explain the reason for the redaction. Had FB not responded before you changed your mind about the decline, you could have just self-reverted; but not after there was a follow-up comment replying to yours. HTH, and best of luck with the mop! Mathglot (talk) 07:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: Yes, you are correct & I will use the strikethough moving forward. Still new to adminship, so I will inevitably make mistakes while learning my way around. Thank you for your feedback! Peaceray (talk) 17:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red December 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | December 2024, Vol 10, Issue 12, Nos 293, 294, 324, 325


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Think of rewarding contributors, especially newcomers, with a barnstar.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Feedback request: Social sciences and society Good Article nomination

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Time preference on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians for Sustainable Development - November 2024 Newsletter

[edit]
This is our thirty-seventh newsletter. This issue has news related to SDG 8, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 17.
User group news
  • User group meeting, 24 November (minutes)
  • We are working on our annual plan for 2025, please add activities that you would like to work on.
Other news
Events

This message was sent with Global message delivery by Ainali (talk) 19:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC) • Contribute • Manage subscription[reply]

Larry Collins (guitarist)

[edit]
Moved to Talk:Larry Collins (guitarist) § Larry Collins (guitarist)
 – Peaceray (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:1937 Liechtenstein spy affair on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ban by SK47

[edit]

Could you please look into why cus I couldn't find anything as there is no info I can find and also I saw something on tea house a few months ago of blocking India idk details and the block is 2 years😶 Yaboibro! (talk) 07:24, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Medicine/proposed doc

[edit]

Template:WikiProject Medicine/proposed doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of quotation from Margaret Sanger on Margaret Sanger page

[edit]

Greetings Peaceray. I'm always glad for constructive criticism; I don't want to overlook things. To assist me in not making such a mistake in the future, can you tell me where on the Margaret Sanger page it is that "if you had truely [sic] read the full article, would have seen that the fuller (& correct quote) was already in . . ." (reference given). I looked at that reference and didn't find it. I did a text search for the phrase "her goal was to eliminate the Negro race" that was in my quote in didn't find it; yet you said I would find it if I read the full article. I want to be a better, and fair, contributor to Wikipedia. To that end, can you tell me what I am doing wrong so that I missed the quote that you said was there, on the Sanger page? Chronic2 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chronic2: You failed to search for the relevant string where I told you to look. I have further responded to the original thread at User talk:Chronic2#December 2024.
If you want me to respond to the original comment, please use the {{ping}} template, as in {{ping|Peaceray}}.
Please remember to sign your comments. This is a requirement as per WP:Signatures. You should not rely on SineBot to do this for you.Peaceray (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Kiyosaki

[edit]
Moved to User talk:2600:1008:B160:54A0:5E0:52F:C254:544C § December 2024
 – Peaceray (talk) 19:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at AIV

[edit]

Regarding this edit, that "evidently a spambot or a compromised account" is, apparently, one of the choices in the drop-down menu Huggle or Twinkle offers when making the report. A lot of users often don't think too clearly about what that says (and in any event you were right to decline the report). Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Thanks! Yes, it seems important to know when to say no, & also to educate errant reporters. I am still learning, as they must be still learning as well. I sometimes wonder if I should also be pinging them, since some of the users might be drive-by reporters. Peaceray (talk) 18:20, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sometimes I've done that. I also watch out for people using the drop-down menu for "evidently a vandalism-only account" when they report IPs (of course, the better fix would be to amend the code so that option is not available when an IP is being reported (something beyond my capabilities). Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit of article on R

[edit]

Hi,

You just reverted my edits of the article on R since you interpreted my edits as a "test" that should be performed in the Wiki Sandbox. However, these edits were genuine and not a test. Please restore my edits unless you have any criticism against the contents of the edits.

Best, DoctorAro DoctorAro (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, another editor did that reversion. And I probably should have used the {{uw-mos1}} warning rather than the {{uw-test1}} template. Since you messaged me both here & on your talk page, I have added a more detailed discussion at User talk:DoctorAro#December 2024. Peaceray (talk) 17:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Peaceray&oldid=1264041536"