User talk:S-Aura

Welcome

Hello, S-Aura, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Sahla parappan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sahla parappan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – NJD-DE (talk) 15:21, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sahla Parappan

Hello, AFTHAB RAHMAN SUNNU. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sahla Parappan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! S-Aura, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:37, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sahla Parappan

Hello, AFTHAB RAHMAN SUNNU. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sahla Parappan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Back to Contributing!

Hello! After few months, I am excited to return to contributing to Wikipedia. I look forward to collaborating with fellow editors and continuing to improve and expand the content on this valuable resource. If you have any questions or need assistance, feel free to reach out to me on my talk page. Happy editing! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 02:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MOBICON, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverview Hotel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:26, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou! for guidance 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:31, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm Ae245. I noticed that in this edit to Yahoo! Mobile, you removed all the content from the page. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ae245 (talk) 09:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Actually there is a draft page name Yahoo! Mobile. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:32, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you'd like to move the draft to this title, you should tag the page with {{db-move|1=page to be moved|2=reason}} There's no need to blank the page. Ae245 (talk) 09:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you think the draft page is notable than please try to move in main space. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 09:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ganga Kinare

Hello S-Aura, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ganga Kinare, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganga Kinare.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 12:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello! @TheLongTone I think Ganga Kinare is Notable Topic and enough source available on Google Search Engine and also a 4 star hotel in Rishikesh established in 1989. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 13:05, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Dear @TheLongTone i have few questions 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 14:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which are? Ask away! I do think you need to know what is necessary to establish notability (as Wikipedia defines it). In the case of a business, it requires significant and independant sources, so with a hotel a lot of press coverage or other mentions (such as in guide books) will simply be the kind of run-of-the-mill stuff that any hotel will generate.TheLongTone (talk) 12:24, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, @TheLongTone I got my answer and my second one is can I am eligible for Other access eg, Rollback on Wikipedia ? thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atrococcus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goux.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Werner Stiehler (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Werner Stiehler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:46, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! @DoubleGrazing, please recheck the draft Werner_Stiehler it was translated from German Wikipedia. Although it was thoroughly reviewed and approved on the German site. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:16, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, what is it you want me to re-check? Are you saying I missed something? Or just saying you're not happy with the decline? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting for ip block exemption

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S-Aura (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am reaching out to request an IP block exemption. I am a user from Areekode, Kerala, and I am currently traveling. Unfortunately, my IP address 2402:3a80::/32 has been blocked for the past 8-10 days, Blocking my ability to access and contribute to Wikipedia. I kindly request that you consider granting me an IP block exemption, as I am a legitimate user who wishes to continue using Wikipedia without interruption. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, S-Aura 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 06:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined. That IP address range block does not affect you, provided you are signed in. And you've demonstrated numerous edits over the past several days, showing you have no problems editing at this time. Yamla (talk) 09:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The IP range you mentioned, 2402:3a80::/32 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial)), is only anon-blocked, which means that you can still edit from the range while you are logged in to your account. I don't see any other issues or affected addresses, so please add any further information if you have it. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 09:01, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article under extended-protected

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Not done Please make your specific request on the article's talk page. --Yamla (talk) 21:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! @Yamla Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 21:26, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Luca Verhoeven for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luca Verhoeven is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luca Verhoeven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DanCherek (talk) 16:53, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Graphetics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heads-up :)

Hey there @S-Aura! I clicked on the "Wikipedia/Hosts" thing (I do it every few days) and I noticed that your info box had your signature in the image box, and it may need to be fixed. Just wanted to make you aware of it. :) Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs - created articles) 14:22, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Sir MemeGod for your Guidance I appreciate it. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 21:04, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rectory (Rettenberg) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rectory (Rettenberg). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rectory (Rettenberg) (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This could be notable per WP:GEOFEAT, but we need to see evidence to support that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rectory (Rettenberg) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translations from other versions of Wikipedia

Hi there, S-Aura. In looking more closely at your article Suai Prison, I discovered that it was a translation of the German article Gefängnis Suai. If you create a new article on the basis of all or parts of an article in another language version of Wikipedia, it is important to avoid copyright problems by covering attribution in your first edit summary. For this article, you should now make a further edit with an edit summary confirming that the article is based on the German version. You will find more detailed explanations under Help:Translation. The articles you have created on the basis of their equivalents in Simple English should be attributed in the same way.--Ipigott (talk) 07:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Ipigott,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I appreciate your effort in ensuring that Wikipedia's copyright policies are followed.

I understand now that I should have provided attribution for the translation of the German article Gefängnis Suai in my initial edit summary.

Additionally, I will review the articles I created based on their Simple English equivalents and ensure that they are properly attributed.

Thank you for pointing out my mistake and for providing guidance on how to correct it. I will make sure to follow the guidelines under Help:Translation going forward.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 07:37, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aarushi Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hello. If there’s a draft that wasn’t accepted, even one of higher quality than the article I tried to redirect, then logically, this one (which was titled to avoid another redirect) shouldn’t be accepted either. BAJI 06:08, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Baji,

Thank you for sharing your insightful thoughts! Your logical approach to evaluating article quality is well appreciated.

Thankyou! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 07:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Obetz, Ohio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franklin County.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Reley moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pawan Reley. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dcotos (talk) 08:30, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dinesh Shetty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinesh Shetty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dinesh Shetty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 17:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nikolai Khitrovo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orientalist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improperly published drafts

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to publish at least three drafts by copying their content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into articlespace (John Bown, Westmeath Minotaurs, and Douglas Stevenson). This is a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution.

Instead, please resume your previous method of publishing drafts like Draft:J.R Midha using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new.

If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please ask the regulars at the technical move requests board or Article for Creation (AfC) help desk.

Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 04:18, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Werner Stiehler

Hello, S-Aura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Werner Stiehler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:08, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kamna Pathak for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamna Pathak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamna Pathak (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Taabii (talk) 13:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Camellias

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Camellias, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pichpich (talk) 22:44, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greater Kailash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Interval Learning (EdTech)

Hello, S-Aura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Interval Learning (EdTech), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vivek Bharti Sharma for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vivek Bharti Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Bharti Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kriji Sehamati (talk) 13:37, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viveka Nand Sharan Tripathi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viveka Nand Sharan Tripathi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viveka Nand Sharan Tripathi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kriji Sehamati (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pawan Reley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pawan Reley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawan Reley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kriji Sehamati (talk) 14:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rudraneil Sengupta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rudraneil Sengupta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudraneil Sengupta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kriji Sehamati (talk) 15:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.B. Suresh Kumar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to P.B. Suresh Kumar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Stop calling other editors sockpuppets without proof! Don't do it EVER again! Any admin MAY block you immediately. BusterD (talk) 15:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:3-octanol

Hello, S-Aura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:3-octanol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about NGC 1165

Hello S-Aura, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, NGC 1165, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NGC 1165.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|GoldMiner24}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

GoldMiner24 ^Talk 04:38, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rectory (Rettenberg)

Hello, S-Aura. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rectory (Rettenberg), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm Jlwoodwa. An article that you recently made, Draft:Anatoly Anatolich, seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or another application using such technology). Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. In particular, you should check each citation, and fictitious references must be removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jlwoodwa (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi S-Aura. Thank you for your work on G. Girish. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this stub for a newly-appoint high-court judge; the cited reliable sources are sufficient for a stub, and one of them links to a list of further news article that relate to him (or his judgements). Remember to add categories when creating pages.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 11:29, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hello

Hello, S-Aura. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Phoebezz22 (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ S-Aura Thank you for your time! Have a great day! Phoebezz22 (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Girish Kumar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Collateral Damage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi S-Aura. Thank you for your work on Diacyclops uruguayensis. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:19, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 10:34, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Swapnil Kotriwar.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Swapnil Kotriwar.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:10, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Pawan Reley.png

Thanks for uploading File:Pawan Reley.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:14, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Arc Shettima AG Qays (08:03, 26 January 2025)

Hi! Please how can I publish a history --Arc Shettima AG Qays (talk) 08:03, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Could you kindly clarify what you mean by publishing a history. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 11:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Jmwstack (17:37, 27 January 2025)

I tried editing a page but the edits did not remain. The page is Janet de Gore. It says she died in 2022. This is NOT TRUE! She is still alive. But this keeps showing up even though I have tried to delete the date of death --Jmwstack (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Jmwstack,

Thank you for bringing this to attention. The information about Janet De Gore death is likely based on a media report or a reliable source cited on the page. If you believe the information is incorrect, you can provide a reliable source confirming that she is still alive, and request an update on the Talk page of the article for review by other editors. Wikipedia relies on verifiable and reliable sources to ensure accuracy.

Happy editing! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 17:43, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

what would a "reliable" source be to show that a person is alive??? A photograph? I know where she lives but she might not want that information published. This just seems ridiculous. She is absolutely alive and well and this Wikipedia page is wrong in saying she died in 2022! Give me a clue how I prove she is alive! Jmwstack (talk) 20:34, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Jmwstack,

I understand your frustration. Proving someone is alive can be challenging, but Wikipedia relies on reliable, verifiable sources for all information, and personal claims or knowledge cannot be used to make changes. To correct the information, you must provide a reliable source, such as a recent interview, statement from a representative, or other publicly available evidence that confirms she is alive. Without such evidence, edits based solely on your claim cannot be accepted.

Relevant guidelines:WP:NOTTRUTH Even if something is true, it cannot be included without verifiable evidence. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 03:22, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well you couldn't have had any verifiable evidence of her death because she is still alive. And yet you published her death date without any verifiable evidence. Please tell me how to prove to you that she is alive. She has an email address but you won't let me give it to you. You could contact her yourself. This is ridiculous and really a black mark on Wikipedia. 67.174.65.35 (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Kuldeep Sandhu

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kuldeep Sandhu, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:29, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kuldeep Sandhu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kuldeep Sandhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kuldeep Sandhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Taabii (talk) 09:41, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harry Josh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Josh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Josh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Taabii (talk) 14:14, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from MallardHunter (14:37, 29 January 2025)

Hey there! My article on Chris Dorsey was denied because it lacked proper citations. I'm sure this is a pretty normal mistake so I had really gone through and added a bunch of links but it still didn't work. What am I doing wrong here? --MallardHunter (talk) 14:37, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly try to fix reference formatting than resubmit. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 14:39, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]