User talk:Aliyiya5903

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating 2024 Sambhal Violence. Cheers! Baqi:) (talk) 12:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the recognition! Glad to contribute. Cheers! Aliyiya5903 (talk) 13:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for creating Shahi Masjid Prayagraj, Enjoy the strawberries. Regards. Taabii (talk) 17:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Taabi for your appreciation and the strawberries. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 17:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article talk pages are not forums for general discussion

Try clicking on the all-caps links before reinstating your edits. As explained on WP:NOTFORUM, article talk pages are for discussing improvements to the articles, not for posting political screeds and pet conspiracy theories related to the subject of the article. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 03:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know talk pages are for improving the article. However, labeling my points as a "conspiracy theory" without providing evidence seems unfair. My point was based on an interview published on Rediff, which refutes claims of hate calls from mosques, and a YouTube video reporting during the exodus. i didn’t include a links, only summarised what was said.

According to Wikipedia’s WP:NPOV policy, all significant viewpoints should be represented to ensure the article remains balanced. I hope you will revert the changes and allow other editors to include these perspectives in line with this guideline. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 08:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A denial is not a "refutation". A fringe conspiracy theory is not a "significant viewpoint". Interviews and YouTube videos are not reliable sources. See A departure from history: Kashmiri Pandits, 1990-2001 by Alexander Evans, p. 21–22 for a discussion of this idea and its dismissal. TryKid ^{[dubious – discuss]} 10:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Labeling it as a "fringe conspiracy theory" in order to fit a particular narrative appears to be biased. The interview, with the state Chief Secretary at the time, is a credible source providing an alternate account, and the YouTube reference is the only historical recording from the exodus. If you still disagree with this approach, I will have no choice but to seek administrative assistance to address this matter and ensure that all relevant perspectives are fairly represented in the article. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 12:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete Edit request template

@Aliya,
Your “Extended-confirmed-protected edit request” is not following the template. You have to clearly mention that what informations you want to change. For example - please change X to Y . According to the template -

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptableand will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y

- Cerium4B • Talk? • 19:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Aliyiya5903! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

I've noticed that you've expressed an interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Unfortunately, due to a history of conflict and disruptive editing it has been designated a contentious topic and is subject to some strict rules.

The rule that affects you most as a new or IP editor is the prohibition on making any edit related to the Arab–Israel conflict, including discussing articles on talk pages, unless you are logged into an account and that account is at least 30 days old and has made at least 500 edits.

This prohibition is broadly construed, so it includes edits such as adding the reaction of a public figure concerning the conflict to their article or noting the position of a company or organization as it relates to the conflict.

The exception to this rule is that you may request a specific change to an article on the talk page of that article or at this page. Please ensure that your requested edit complies with our neutral point of view and reliable sourcing policies, and if the edit is about a living person our policies on biographies of living people as well.

Any edits you make contrary to these rules are likely to be reverted, and repeated violations can lead to you being blocked from editing.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! The Kip ^(contribs) 18:39, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Traumnovelle (talk) 20:23, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you leave your opinion on the discussion on recent disruption of the terrorist attack and the perpetrator's articles?

2024 Magdeburg car attack and Taleb Al-Abdulmohsen Theofunny (talk) 20:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified Claim

I have removed your edits as they present unverified claims and speculation, which do not meet Wikipedia’s standards for reliable sourcing and neutrality. While the information comes from individuals who have been in direct contact with Taleb, these statements still require independent verification from reliable sources to be included in the article. Wikipedia is not a platform for unsubstantiated allegations, and all content must be backed by verifiable, credible sources. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Aliyiya5903, I think u have mistakenly added a new topic instead of replying! — Cerium4B —Talk? • 18:13, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are right i have mistakenly replied to my talk page instead of the user talk page. No worries, and thank you for pointing it out. Aliyiya5903 (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to help :) — Cerium4B —Talk? • 18:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]