User talk:Shadow. 547

Welcome!

Hi Shadow. 547! I noticed your contributions to Otrar Catastrophe and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Bamyan (1221) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Bamyan (1221). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ashina Revolt moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ashina Revolt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liberation of Khovd moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Liberation of Khovd. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:27, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dude i didnt even add Mongol victory🤦‍♂️ Shadow. 547 (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this and this edit, what do you not understand about MOS:MILRESULT? The relevant page was linked, instead you write yeah the result stuff did get removed because some random guy called Airshipman something like that yeah he didn’t like it and was yapping about Timurid victory should be blah blah blah. If you are simply going to edit war over this, then it suggests that a block is necessary. Mellk (talk) 12:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Timurid conquests and invasions. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. HistoryofIran (talk) 23:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 22:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks and uncivil comments. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Chris | Crazycomputers (talk) 06:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Siege of Nishapur moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Nishapur. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's great, thank you so much @AirshipJungleman29! @Shadow. 547 AI has a tendency to "hallucinate" and make things up (I saw a fascinating video about a lawyer who used ChatGPT and completely destroyed his court case, the judge was really angry when they found out). It's great that you're trying to fill in gaps in Wikipedia, but so many people use this site that we have to be incredibly careful. I'd recommend rewriting the article from scratch in your own words (you can use the draft as a skeleton) and look for reliable sources, again from scratch because AI isn't good at this part. There are lots of pages to help you do this, and you can use the Teahouse if you need help! I'm learning a lot about copyediting, grammar checking etc. so I'm happy to give your draft a once-over from that perspective before you submit it to AFC if that might be useful for you? Blue-Sonnet (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Siege of Moscow (1238), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siege of Moscow. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Bamyan (1221) (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Mongol invasion of the Khwarazmian Empire. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Bamyan (1221) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 05:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No i don’t want it to be merged to mongol invasion of khwarezmian empire i want it to be a seperate article so il keep editing and adding sources Shadow. 547 (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shadow. 547! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Snowycats (talk) 05:03, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]