User:J.delanoy/dashboard
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 115.37.190.229 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1319 (LTA 1319, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- TheOilSpillExpert (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1135 (LTA 1135, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 22:46, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Anonymous author 2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Alith Anar 20:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Warned user. For the last time. Daniel Case (talk) 20:22, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- 204.155.8.232 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Cowabunga Canyon Waterpark (diff): account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. Previously blocked. —JlACEer (talk) 21:32, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Peaceray (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- 223.24.95.35 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) User vandalised past 4th warning). Sneezless (talk page) (contribs)
- SCOOBY-THE -TRAP-BOY (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Wikipedia:Teahouse (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Theroadislong (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Prophetkehinde1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – account is being used only for promotional purposes. Self-promotion after final warning. CycloneYoris talk! 22:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Creepydudewithweridusername (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Imacoolcoolguythatcandoanything (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Katesten (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "testicles" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:20, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Tdnewrygfc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Tobs12afc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
[edit]- Cadence Digital (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. This is the name of a company. Promotional edits to Wendy Holden (author, born 1961). Tacyarg (talk) 23:24, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- South West RiverWood (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Frost 03:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Fathoms Below (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Iconicmusicians (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. There are at least two results in Google showing variations of Iconic Musiciaans as a musical agency. these edits on Commons show that this is a music industry professional, representing their client, BJ Sam. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. You didn't provide a link to any website, and I've not been able to find any such company (too many related search returns on those keywords!). I agree, this is someone going through the legit actions of uploading a photo they've taken of a client to Commons. But at this stage I'm reluctant to block for a promotional username here, and feel the message left on their talk page should suffice for now. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- ForgeFront (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Submitted Draft:ForgeFront to AfC. KylieTastic (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- EnvisionGames (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Conceivably the games division of Envision Entertainment - https://www.envision-entertainment.de/games/. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- RealJordanTerrellCarter (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Playboi Carti, maybe they're really them? Or maybe they just Wokeuplikethis. Knitsey (talk) 18:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- SHEJO VARGHESE (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. 💽 LunaEclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (CALL ME IF YOU GET LOST) 19:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- NFmarketing (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – editing Neenah Foundry (NF). 81.2.123.64 (talk) 19:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- TurkászBot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- NARUC-editor (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. win8x (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Resumption of the same IP/sock Bigboss19923 block evasion as merited the previous protection, adding fake voice acting credits. Belbury (talk) 14:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive edits. For the record, the same level of protection was required to stop disruptive editing at List of presidents of Bangladesh, some years ago. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 15:02, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – WP:ARBPIA4 - Attracting conflict related disruptive editing. --Seawolf35 T--C 18:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined Single user causing problem. Given CT template notice. If problem continues, consider reporting user. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:17, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:21, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Many instances of vandalism since last October (50+ edits?), including a dozen in the past week. See page history filtered to reverts. Iiii I I I (talk) 19:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Shadow4dark (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:07, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Addition of unsourced, and puffery material by IPs, also WP:NOT. ExclusiveEditor 🔔 Ping Me! 20:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm assuming you meant the main 2025 Prayag Kumbh Mela page and not the talk page? Iiii I I I (talk) 21:18, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Geraldo Perez (talk) 22:19, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: The same person, under different IPs (one, two, three), has been trying to add the same (fake) information for the past week. Edits generally include "King Mart", which is not a character in the film, and "Keith Beraingham", who is not a credited actor. Iiii I I I (talk) 22:34, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Add “by June 30, 2024” to the sentence: The Lancet has estimated 70,000 deaths due to traumatic injuries.[8] Seahumidity (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 00:03, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
| 16 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:31, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Has created 166 articles, with all of them created over the last year or so are still live. As part of NPP, I reviewed Titus Joseph Mdoe and found that SiniyaEdita had created the page without the intervention from others, and I didn't think that it needed further improvement. Other articles they created are of a similar standard. Klbrain (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: copyediting, particularly regarding MOS:NUM guidelines. ArkHyena (it/its) 20:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights: mostly editing redirects so that they are tagged with the correct rcats harrz talk 15:58, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for confirmation |
|---|
Confirmed[edit]
Reason for requesting confirmed rights: Need to add official logo for a school page and edit the name to the more current/appropriate one Dagoofybloke (talk) 13:57, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
Reason for Request: I am requesting reinstatement of Extended Confirmed Rights after their removal by User:ScottishFinnishRadish for concerns related to "gaming EC through adding a machine translation of Fondation Maeght and Rueil-Malmaison in many small edits without attribution." He asked me to "make at least a few hundred edits" to regain it. Since the removal, I have added attribution to the concerned articles. I have made over 600 referenced contributions, focusing on adding reliable sources to improve verifiability, expanding content in alignment with Wikipedia’s standards, and enhancing article quality. I believe my recent contributions demonstrate constructive and policy-compliant editing. Examples of Recent Contributions: Foucault pendulum, Water metering, Smart meter, and Gas meter. My recent edits also contributed significantly to upgrading the article History of the Jews in Tunisia from "Start-Class" to "B-Class." Michael Boutboul (talk) 12:28, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done - This request has been unanswered for nearly a month. I think that is because you have asked three admins (Star Mississippi here, and Drmies and ScottishFinnishRadish at your talk page) to justify concerns which they have already described clearly and repeatedly. That is placing an onus on them to prove you untrustworthy. This is not how permissions requests work. Two significant concerns have been raised already: (1.) you have added translated content from other Wikipedias without attribution and (2.) you have artificially split your article contributions into separate edits to more quickly reach a high edit count, e.g. 127 edits to Water metering. I have to say that at water metering alone, while your changes were significant, they don't justify that number of edits. That together with the timing of your request makes it reasonably likely that you made those 127 edits to attain the target set for you (to make a "few hundred" more edits) when the permission was removed. In those circumstances, the concerns raised are unaddressed. I would not be comfortable granting you the permission. Permissions are revoked due to lack of trust and there is no automatic right to regain it. If you wish to gain this permission again, the onus would be on you to prove that trust has been regained. arcticocean ■ 21:57, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
@OhNoItsJamie removed my access to EC because i made a quite a few test edits and said if i made 100 constructive edits, i would gain it back, and so im asking for it, if not its fine i guess
Reason for requesting extended confirmed rights Hello! A few weeks ago my extended-confirmed protection was removed for breaking WP:PGAME, I sincerely apologize for this, I was impatient and I had no knowledge of the rules existence at the time. Out of the 600 edits I’ve done so far, only ~50-80 of them are dummy edits, which I’ve done on my sandbox. Zabezt (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag. |
|---|
File mover[edit] |
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
Hello, I would like to apply for New page reviewer rights. I am actively involved in reviewing Recent changes and Pending changes. I have also been reviewing Articles for creation since December 2024. Additionally, I have participated in Articles for deletion discussions. My primary areas of interest include politics, politicians, history, sports and topics related to Sri Lanka. I always strive to explain to editors the reasons for reverting their edits or declining their submissions when addressing their queries. I have also contributed by creating articles in the mainspace and participating in the NPPS programme to enhance my knowledge. Thank you. QEnigma talk 19:59, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
During my one-month trial as a NPR, I reviewed dozens of pages, nominated several for deletion or sending some to draftspace and edited/improved some pages. While I made some mistakes, such as accepting (good) page(s) created by socks that were later deleted, I intend to continue contributing responsibly by carefully reviewing pages, adhering to guidelines. I request renewal of the rights to continue supporting the project effectively. ANUwrites 04:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
Have participated in handful of RMs in past year, as well as at MRV. I've only come to RMTR once, but otherwise would be useful for disambiguation purposes. As I often create the disambig first, in order to justify a page moving away from ptopic; this often leaves me with having to swap the disambig page with the redirect and visa versa afterwards, when I simply need to perform a swap. I've otherwise closed RMs before, and would probably close more that aren't too controversial, but am often restricted due to the need to overwrite a redirect. CNC (talk) 12:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
I've been requesting occasional, regular and errant page moves at RMTR ever since I either created this account or achieved the extended-confirmed threshold. After 30 months of existence and persistence and in this new year, I'm ready to take the next step and have this right for a start as I can have an impact on this encyclopaedia. Intrisit (talk) 20:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm requesting page mover rights because I want to have the ability, which would help in vandalism patrols and other things. Currently, someone moved a page for basically no reason and I'm trying to move it back, otherwise the page will have no former revision history. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:59, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
As I also do recent changes patrolling, having this permission will extemeley help me with combatting vandals, as edits requesting review can be viewed on the Recent Changes page, which will help me.
Hello I'm Ampil. The right set to expire 7 days. I've received a award. and I'm a AfC reviewer. ~🌀 Ampil 「💬 / 📝」 04:39, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I've been active in the Wikipedia community adding new content and creating articles, but especially fighting vandalism. I have also gained experience in reviewing by looking and reviewing semi-protected and protected pages edit requests. I am now looking for a new challenge, and I think I could help by putting forth my skills for the pending changes reviewer role! Thanks for the consideration.TYPEINFO (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I have been patrolling the recent changes page for a long time now, and it's pretty much the only thing I do on here (other then occasional copyediting.) When I learned about rollback and its benefits, I thought that could be a huge help for me and patrolling against vandalism. I love patrolling, and this will make my life so much easier. Thanks, Tenebre_Rosso_Sangue, Editing with SSStyle! Call for Medic! My Stats! 20:38, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights Hello! I routinely go to the Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection when I spot vandalism. I believe this would make the process of resolving issues faster. If you need links to my requests, I can provide them! If there is more things I could do, please tell me. NotQualified (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello everyone. I would like to request rollback rights here. I have a long and controversial history on the English Wikipedia but hope that especially in recent years, I have proved as to other editors, as well to the administrators, a positive change in my editorial behavior. I myself, don't forgive and don't forget my mistakes, but believe that with my experience and knowledge on the Macedonian issue, I will be useful in the fight against vandalism in this complicated question. Even though I'm worried, I remember Matthew 7:7-8: “Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; the one who seeks finds; and to the one who knocks, the door will be opened." Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor[edit]
Hello, Recently, I went on vacation, which has given me more time to dedicate to Wikipedia. During this period, I noticed some issues with the Dark mode theme. Inspired by user @Synpath, who took the initiative to propose changes to the Drugbox template, I began working on fixing dark mode compatibility in other templates. Specifically, I have contributed to improving Template:Annotated image 4, Template:Enzymatic reaction, and Template:Biochem reaction subunit. In 2019, I created a Lua module for the Portuguese Wikipedia to assist editors in finding articles without citations. This tool categorizes articles by the month and year the tag was added and allows sorting by pageviews. You can view the module and the associated template. I mention this to demonstrate my ability to work with modules if needed, although I currently do not intend to work on modules. The primary reason for this request is to be able to contribute more actively to the Drugbox and Chembox templates. I have previously participated in discussions to update the Brazilian drug legal status parameter in them (see: Template talk:Infobox drug/Archive 19#Legal status in Brazil - Add subclasses F1, F2 and F3 and Template talk:Chembox/Archive 13#Template-protected edit request on 15 August 2023). I am also contemplating starting a project, potentially under the umbrella of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology, to expand the "legal status" parameter to include additional countries, particularly China and India. This expansion would aim to improve greater understanding of how different countries regulate and culturally perceive various substances. Thanks! -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC) |