Talk:Squid Game season 2

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

December 22 to 28, 2024 (1st)

Ep 1 Summary

It's 3:22am, how is there an episode 1 summary already if it just came out 22min ago? Scientificaldan (talk) 08:23, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

watched in 4x speed 2603:8080:6B07:27A4:7DA2:B366:F732:F5F0 (talk) 03:33, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But Netflix only goes up to 1.5x speed. Scientificaldan (talk) 04:20, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

browser extension lets me watch in 4x speed. i have a short attention span 2603:8080:6B07:27A4:9883:A3F5:61F2:4C9F (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Changing the reception between audiences to positive instead of mixed reviews

Ive seen many people say positive to very positive stuff about across various soical medias and websites that give users scoring on it and they've all mostly been positive atleast Master Of WikiChange (talk) 22:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

why are we even mentioning audience thoughts? What sources are talking about that? Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't audience thoughts what matters? Critics have been wrong so many times recently. Scientificaldan (talk) 04:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Audience scores can be gamed, which result in things like review bombing. If there is a serious factor about audience scores, we need to have reliable sources to discuss this. Masem (t) 04:36, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

First, thank you for your suggestion. While it's interesting to observe general trends on social media, we need to rely on reliable, verifiable sources for Wikipedia content. This includes user-submitted feedback from platforms like IMDb or Metacritic, as well as coverage discussing that feedback.

Early reviews do indicate a mix of positive and less favorable reactions, which suggests some diversity in audience opinions. I understand the excitement and desire for people to appreciate the season; however, since season 2 is still newly released, audience reception may evolve over time. It might be best to wait for a more settled consensus before making changes to reflect audience reception. DMBradbury 22:10, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

iz 102.90.102.244 (talk) 20:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone change the pronunciation of squid game two because I couldn’t recognize it

. Mightyfootttt (talk) 05:49, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]