Wikipedia:XfD today
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
This page transcludes all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.
Speedy deletion candidates
[edit]Articles
[edit]
- Putra Adhiguna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am unable to find any independent coverage of this BLP. The 15 sources cited in the article are author listings, biography listings, interviews, articles written by the subject, alumni listings, coverage from events, seminars, conferences, summits and more interviews. It is unclear what makes the subject notable or what their contributions are which could be used to assess whether any SNG is met. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Finance, Economics, Technology, Asia, and Indonesia. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Caribbean Twenty20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- 2010 Caribbean Twenty20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2010–11 Caribbean Twenty20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2011–12 Caribbean Twenty20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2012–13 Caribbean Twenty20 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Not enough coverage on independent reliable sources for any of these articles; all of them fail WP:GNG. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and Caribbean. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:11, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Also, nominated the season articles. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 13:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep all. Major T20 domestic competition of an ICC Full Member. AA (talk) 21:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep all per AA. StAnselm (talk) 14:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are no policy-based opinions. Discussion should focus on whether good sources are available (WP:GNG.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:46, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Angelina Jaffe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a diplomat, not properly sourced as passing inclusion criteria for diplomats. As always, diplomats are not "inherently" notable enough for Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to show that they would pass WP:GNG on third-party coverage and analysis about their work in media and books. But this is "referenced" solely to a staff profile on the self-published website of a publication that the subject was the bylined author (not the subject) of a couple of pieces of writing for and a brief glancing namecheck of her existence in a short blurb announcing the appointment of 16 new ambassadors -- meaning that the first is a directly affiliate primary source that isn't support for notability at all, while the second isn't detailed enough to get her over WP:GNG all by itself if it's all the secondary sourcing she's got: we need to see substantive coverage about her work in diplomatic roles, not just cursory verification of the fact that she's been appointed to them. Bearcat (talk) 14:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Venezuela. Bearcat (talk) 14:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Karthik Raja Karnan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable businessman, inventor and entrepreneur. The ANI piece is advertorial article, as it is written at the end see this [1]. Non of the sources are reliable. Taabii (talk) 14:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, India, and Tamil Nadu. Taabii (talk) 14:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- East Rutherford High School (North Carolina) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a school, not properly referenced as passing WP:NSCHOOL. As always, schools are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they exist, and have to pass WP:ORG and WP:GNG on their sourceability -- but this is "referenced" solely to the school's own self-published website about itself, with absolutely no GNG-worthy coverage about it in independent third-party sources (media, books, etc.) shown at all. Bearcat (talk) 13:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and North Carolina. Bearcat (talk) 13:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Association of Maldivian Engineers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No notability of this association and no public information about it. Closest thing available was the "Association of Civil Engineers Maldives" Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 11:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 11:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This is the closest thing to a RS I could find [2], which isn't enough. The last AfD was kept as a !keep due to mentions/profiles on two association websites, which isn't quite enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2021–22 Women's T20 Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- Women's T20 Cup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage for a separate season article; should be merged back to the parent article. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC) — Not enough coverage on independent reliable sources for both articles; both fail WP:GNG. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and Zimbabwe. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 11:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete As per nom Shrug02 (talk) 00:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:55, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- 58 Seconds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NFILM; there's nothing from a cursory search to also substantiate notability. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Television, Entertainment, and Hungary. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Why is this sorted in Television-related AfDs? I don't think this is a TV production. -Mushy Yank. 12:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak delete. Was unable to find any online sources about this film. As it stands, it fails WP:NFILM. Though, part of me wonders if there are any offline sources considering the film was made in 1964; if there are multiple reliable sources covering this film from something like a newspaper then I would consider keeping it. Beachweak (talk) 10:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as it is the first and noted film of a notable director (https://nfi.hu/en/core-films-1/films-3/documentaries-1/58-seconds.html) (see NFIC: involves a notable person and is a major part of their career) A Redirect to Lívia Gyarmathy#Filmography, a standard alternative to deletion when the director is notable and has a page on this WP, seems warranted anyway [edited after having improved the page]. -Mushy Yank. 12:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -Mushy Yank. 12:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. -Mushy Yank. 22:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keely Shaye Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notable mainly for being Pierce Brosnan's wife. However, notability is not inherited. All reliable references to her exist because she is Pierce Brosnan's wife.
Fails notability guideline WP:JOURNALIST --LK (talk) 09:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --LK (talk) 09:45, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Journalism, Television, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I've found a few non-trivial newspaper articles that aren't just about her link to Brosnan. The second one mentions their relationship but it's more about her and her own career work. 1, 2. GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 14:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep while the article is not fully referenced there are four sources with WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. Two were noted by GoldenAgeFan1 and I found two others. While all but one mention Pierce Brosnan they are primarily about the subject. All are now in the article but were not before the AfD discussion. There may be more sources but it's difficult to find those that might be primarily about the subject given all the articles about the Brosnans as a couple. Nnev66 (talk) 02:42, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Novakovich, Lilana (August 21, 1989). "Food therapy for GH's Valerie". The Toronto Star – via newspapers.com.
- Slewinski, Christy (December 29, 1995). "Keely Shaye Smith turns her green thumb to gold". Chicago Tribune. ProQuest 291082310 – via newspapers.com.
- Fabian, Allison (January 1999). "Keely Shaye Smith putting her passion to work". New Woman. Vol. 29, no. 1. New York: Hearst Magazine Media, Inc. p. 13. ProQuest 206658619.
- Tschinkel, Arielle (August 5, 2024). "Who Is Pierce Brosnan's Wife? All About Keely Shaye Brosnan". People (magazine).
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:55, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Nomad (app) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The app seems to have no notability and what appears to be a bogus link to another company, with no reliable sources confirming it. The sources provided with mentions of the Nomad app appear to be promotional in nature and therefore I believe that this article should be deleted. Nyxion303 (talk) 10:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Business. Nyxion303 (talk) 10:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2024 Tel Aviv truck attack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:LASTING, seems to be WP:NOTNEWS. EF5 19:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Terrorism and Israel. EF5 19:17, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Kept five weeks ago, with very few delete opinions. Geschichte (talk) 20:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: No lasting effects, all news is from over a month ago at this point. The media cycle has moved on it seems. Two deaths is rather routine and nothing out of the ordinary, even in a regular traffic accident. This isn't the Yonge Street attack in Toronto where a dozen people got caught... Oaktree b (talk) 21:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:24, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There appears to be no coverage after the first week. LASTING and NOTNEWS definitely apply. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:54, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Merge to List of vehicle-ramming attacks or Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2024. Concerns above do apply but it is in the scope of those two lists. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Marginally prefer the first target (also any merge should be very cut down). PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I'm not aware of much continued coverage so far (it's still early), but that isn't strictly required, and the initial coverage was quite extensive, easily meeting WP:N(E)'s standard of
very likely to be notable if they have widespread (national or international) impact and were very widely covered in diverse sources
. There are far too many RS to list, probably 100+. Just to mention some of the largest: BBC, NBC, CBS, Reuters, Al Jazeera, NPR. The article needs work but there's ample source material. — xDanielx T/C\R 06:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)- XDanielx, your quoted standard refers to national or international impact, but I'm not sure any of your linked sources go over that in any detail? Can you clarify what you believe the lasting effects are? Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Alpha3031: I was thinking of the human toll (a death and 30-40 injuries), but on second thought maybe impact is a gray area. I think ultimately since WP:N(E) has no hard requirements, we have to consider multiple factors, but the WP:DIVERSE factor certainly supports inclusion. I also just feel that when coverage is so extensive, the WP:GNG presumption should carry weight, leading us to default to inclusion unless there's a particularly strong argument for why it would fail WP:N(E). — xDanielx T/C\R 17:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- While they may be WP:DIVERSE sources, no sources extend past a few days after the event. This attack has no WP:LASTING impact and no WP:SUSTAINED coverage. And while I understand that I should WP:FOC with this, I think it's important to note that the article creator wrote the page while the news was still WP:BREAKING, and has been PBlocked for these creations, something which should be relevant here as the article was created regardless of the event's impact. EF5 17:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Setting aside the burst of coverage
immediately after
(the guideline's language), there was still significant coverage days after the event, like [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. Most of that was 2-3 days after, though the last was Dec 2. - I wouldn't say WP:PERSISTENCE particularly favors inclusion, but this doesn't exactly fail the standard either. In any case it's only one factor, not a requirement, while other factors like WP:DIVERSE favor inclusion.
- I don't think the author's motivations should be considered, particularly since that was a while ago and this already survived one AfD. — xDanielx T/C\R 18:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- Setting aside the burst of coverage
- While they may be WP:DIVERSE sources, no sources extend past a few days after the event. This attack has no WP:LASTING impact and no WP:SUSTAINED coverage. And while I understand that I should WP:FOC with this, I think it's important to note that the article creator wrote the page while the news was still WP:BREAKING, and has been PBlocked for these creations, something which should be relevant here as the article was created regardless of the event's impact. EF5 17:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Alpha3031: I was thinking of the human toll (a death and 30-40 injuries), but on second thought maybe impact is a gray area. I think ultimately since WP:N(E) has no hard requirements, we have to consider multiple factors, but the WP:DIVERSE factor certainly supports inclusion. I also just feel that when coverage is so extensive, the WP:GNG presumption should carry weight, leading us to default to inclusion unless there's a particularly strong argument for why it would fail WP:N(E). — xDanielx T/C\R 17:14, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- XDanielx, your quoted standard refers to national or international impact, but I'm not sure any of your linked sources go over that in any detail? Can you clarify what you believe the lasting effects are? Alpha3031 (t • c) 12:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Keep: Stay is a fact with significant coverage and great impact on Israeli society that is going through moments of fight against terrorism. 190.219.101.225 (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- @190.219.101.225: Can I get a few examples of significant and lasting coverage, and that this event had long-lasting, if any, impacts on Israeli society? EF5 16:51, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Just noting that the prior AFD was just held last month. It's pretty soon for a return trip to AFDLand. But I'm relisting this discussion as I don't see a consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)- Keep - This has significant coverage and is notable. Should be kept. ZebulonMorn (talk) 21:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll ask this again, where is the significant coverage here? I see 5 sources, all of which were published right after the attack. EF5 22:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sources don't need to be in the current article to contribute to notability though. I listed more above, including 7 which were not immediately after the attack. Would you be convinced by a much longer list (including ones immediately after)? I'm happy to compile one if it would be useful. — xDanielx T/C\R 04:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2-3 days after an event is normal. There is zero WP:LASTING coverage. EF5 13:33, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- Sources don't need to be in the current article to contribute to notability though. I listed more above, including 7 which were not immediately after the attack. Would you be convinced by a much longer list (including ones immediately after)? I'm happy to compile one if it would be useful. — xDanielx T/C\R 04:22, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'll ask this again, where is the significant coverage here? I see 5 sources, all of which were published right after the attack. EF5 22:46, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - this attack has left fourty (!) people injured and has a good sources. It definitely fulfills the criteria for GNG and thus it should be kept. Karol739 (talk) 22:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all the coverage provided is run of the fill news reports. No secondary sources have been identified. Traumnovelle (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Could you elaborate further? News reports are normally secondary sources (unless the topic is the news org or what not). Are you saying you'd like to see non-news sources like books or papers? It seems too early for that. — xDanielx T/C\R 16:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
News reports are normally secondary sources
This is incorrect. You're confusing secondary with independent.It seems too early for that.
This is correct. That's why the article is up for deletion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:12, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Could you elaborate further? News reports are normally secondary sources (unless the topic is the news org or what not). Are you saying you'd like to see non-news sources like books or papers? It seems too early for that. — xDanielx T/C\R 16:16, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - no WP:LASTING coverage. Would make sense maybe as a section in another article – this one maybe? – but we don't have an article for every single thing that happens, even if those things do get news coverage. Smallangryplanet (talk) 10:25, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete no long lasting effects and not significantly covered Bloxzge 025 (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. A brief burst of news coverage does not count toward notability. Death count is irrelevant, and citing it indicates that one still needs more time to learn how notability works on Wikipedia. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- Seconding/per xDanielx. Regardless; Also am uncomfortable with the amount of time passed since the last AfD; This discussion should be procedurally closed as per WP:6MONTHS.MWFwiki (talk) 03:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lone Tree, Indiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Baker actually describes this as a post office spot which moved, which is a classic 4th class PO thing. No, it doesn't mean that everyone pulled up stakes and moved; it just means that the original postmaster stopped handling the mail, and someone somewhere else took over. As usual I'm finding scant evidence for an actual town. Mangoe (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Indiana. Shellwood (talk) 14:15, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- I.I.M.U.N. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The Wikipedia page for IIMUN (India's International Movement to Unite Nations) does not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria as outlined in the General Notability Guidelines (GNG). While the organization claims widespread activity and recognition, the sources cited are primarily self-published or lack significant, reliable secondary coverage in independent publications. The majority of the references either originate from IIMUN itself, social media posts, or promotional material, which are insufficient to establish notability. Furthermore, the achievements mentioned, such as organizing large-scale conferences and initiatives like "Find a Bed," fail to receive substantial and consistent coverage from reputable third-party sources over a significant period. Without verifiable, independent, and non-trivial coverage, the subject cannot be deemed notable under Wikipedia's policies. Therefore, the article does not merit inclusion and should be considered for deletion. Likehumansdo (talk) 09:29, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2024 December 18. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Offline 09:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, Education, India, and Maharashtra. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: The nom should have done the review just like their username Likehumansdo. This is a clear keep, it easily passes GNG, and I can't find any reason for deletion. It seems like the rationale was pulled out of thin air, almost like asking, "Generate a reason to delete this article?".--— MimsMENTOR talk 15:57, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- The I.I.M.U.N. page passes GNG, the sources are credible. Find a Bed is covered by Forbes, moreover your whole comment is 100% AI generated without actually going through the sources. Can you point out any specific source which is not credible? IIMUN upon a single Google Search comes up in reputable non-promotional news, articles and mention in various books. Your comment falls short of appreciation, moreover when independent users like us have to keep Wikipedia alive and running. Ihsaan45 (talk) 13:53, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- IIMUN clearly passes CNG, it is a clearly prominent organisation with enough credibility on the internet. Rjain1998 (talk) 14:30, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't think the nomination looks AI-generated. The page looks somewhat fluffy. I took you up on your challenge and sampled one source I looked at, "Billabong School: Bringing Change with Students' Holistic Development". September 2018. Retrieved 2020-02-29., and it looks completely useless. The source is not very reliable and is not relevant for what it is supposed to back up in the article. Geschichte (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: As mentioned already, the sources seem to be in line with the content written. Hence my take is to keep the page as it only mentions the credibility of the organization while also following the GNG. Ihsaan45 (talk) 12:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Keep: As mentioned above: The I.I.M.U.N. page passes GNG, the sources are credible. Find a Bed is covered by Forbes. IIMUN upon a single Google Search comes up in reputable non-promotional news, articles and mention in various books. Your comment falls short of appreciation, moreover, when independent users like us have to keep Wikipedia alive and running. As mentioned already, the sources seem to be in line with the content written. Hence, my take is to keep the page as it only mentions the credibility of the organization while also following the GNG. Ihsaan45 (talk)
Ihsaan45 (talk) 10:48, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep: As mentioned already, the sources seem to be in line with the content written. Hence my take is to keep the page as it only mentions the credibility of the organization while also following the GNG. Ihsaan45 (talk) 12:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: because it is promotional and lacks credible, verifiable citations. Charlie (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
*Keep: As mentioned above: The I.I.M.U.N. page passes GNG, the sources are credible. Find a Bed is covered by Forbes. IIMUN upon a single Google Search comes up in reputable non-promotional news, articles and mention in various books. Your comment falls short of appreciation, moreover, when independent users like us have to keep Wikipedia alive and running. As mentioned already, the sources seem to be in line with the content written. Hence, my take is to keep the page as it only mentions the credibility of the organization while also following the GNG.Ihsaan45 (talk)Ihsaan45 (talk) 09:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)- Rjain1998 (talk) 09:22, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- This editor has been found to be turning a redirected page into a page about IIMUN's founder, potentially indicating a case of article hijacking. Charlie (talk) 13:39, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Noventi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP. Insufficient independent in-depth sources to establish notability. The notability requirements for companies is much higher now. Article seems to be created by COI user. Imcdc Contact 09:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Organizations, Companies, United States of America, and California. Imcdc Contact 09:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: An under-referenced article on a VC firm, simply listing the people involved. The current version makes no claim to notability, nor would the lists of past investments in prior instances. The sources at the 2008 AfD would now fall under the "standard notices" provision at WP:CORPTRIV, and searches are not finding more substantial coverage, whether as Noventi Ventures or CIR Ventures. Fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 08:50, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Abu Dhabi T20 Trophy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough coverage on independent reliable sources; Fails WP:GNG. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Cricket, and United Arab Emirates. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 09:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- American Share Insurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Actually not meeting NCORP; I did we before however it did not help. NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 08:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Ohio. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Armed Forces Insurance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I did wp before, but was not able to locate reliable sources meeting NCORP. Ready to withdraw the nomination if the reliable sources are found and added NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 08:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Military, Companies, and Kansas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Teen Universe 2015 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:EVENT or WP:GNG. Furthermore, this Teen Universe competition does not have its own standalone article, suggesting limited notability for the event series as a whole. - The9Man Talk 08:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, Beauty pageants, and Guatemala. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:GNG, the fact that no other article for this event except this one raises some eyebrows. Madeline1805 (talk) 14:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Express Media Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of WP:NOTABILITY (if it still exists). I've just fixed about half a dozen incoming links intended for the Pakistani organisation of the same name. I suggest moving the Pakistani org to this name, and creating a redirect from Express Media Group (Australia) to the 4WD article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:10, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- p.s. I've just discovered that Express Media Group (Pakistan) is actually just a redirect, not an article. So I suggest just making Express Media Group a redirect to the same article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Australia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 09:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hakol Over Habibi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:BLP1E. Source search only shows unreliable sources or brief mentions in reliable sources, and is only notable for their appearance in the Eurovision Song Contest in 1981 (going off the article and sources) and have almost no coverage besides that, can't find anything related to the alleged albums in the article.
Not to mention it's a BLP without any references or external links, which makes it eligible for BLP PRODing. —Sparkle and Fade talkedits 08:59, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Israel. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- HDFC securities (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Indian media sources should be viewed carefully, as they often present press releases as news WP:RSNOI, WP:ROUTINE. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. TC-BT-1C-SI (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Maharashtra. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:07, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Arri PL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article created from redirect is completely unreferenced with no notability argument. Although a quick Wikipedia search for "Arri PL" yields 60 hits, these are passing mentions at best. Does not meet WP:GNG and at this rate is a lot of unverifiable original research. Violates WP:OR. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Cielquiparle (talk) 07:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Gregory J. Blotnick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's unclear to me why this man's fraud conviction makes him notable. There were many people who committed PPP fraud and while large, his is not the largest or most well reported. I see a smattering of reporting, of the routine kind of reporting you usually see that is rewritten SEC or DOJ press releases.
Furthermore, I don't see how he is notable for his finance activities prior to his conviction.
This article seems to promote the man in a strange kind of way. I am concerned about the potential COI nature of this articles creation as well, because the Wikidata item for this page/person, Gregory Blotnick (Q131440997) is being actively edited by wikidata:User:Gregory J. Blotnick so shortly after creation. William Graham talk 05:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Crime, and Finance. William Graham talk 05:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - I wish that fraud and misprision, my two least favorite crimes, were crimes that would automatically make a perpetrator notable, but that has not been consensus since 2007. Bearian (talk) 05:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I think it can be edited to remove some sources and info but after seeing sources such as, The Palm Beach Post, Business Insider, www.justice.gov, Dealbreaker, which are already cited on Wikipedia for multiple notable entities, the page can be kept. It also passes general criteria of notability as per WP:GNG. I can help editing. NatalieTT (talk) 18:10, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Keep article gained full notoriety, as it is an important case with a properly licensed work. It is not a template. It appears to comply with WP:GNG. so keep. 190.219.101.225 (talk) 05:58, 24 December 2024 (UTC)WP:BOLD strikeout as a suspected sockpuppet of Alon9393. Geschichte (talk) 08:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)- Keep There are articles about him in reliable sources like Bloomberg, Newsweek, Miami Herald, NJ and National Law Review.Kwftnlf (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Meets notability guidelines. Firecat93 (talk) 06:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- 17th SAARC summit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable enough for a separate article, can be redirected to List of SAARC summits. Unilandofma (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions. Unilandofma (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect. This article lacks WP:RS and WP:IS to meet the WP:V. The current status of the organisation is unclear and largely speculative, given the absence of summits since 2014 and the cancellation of the 2016 summit and subsequent meetings. QEnigma talk 16:04, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Benison (Beni · talk) 06:23, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Lalbiakzuala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT. Some appearances in India's second league. Found no significant and independent coverage, though his name might be written in a number of different ways. Creator is blocked indefinitely. Geschichte (talk) 04:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, India, and Mizoram. CptViraj (talk) 06:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- 12 Blues (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Only notable thing on the article to me was "world's first hotel residences offered for sale by the government of the Maldives." which is far-fetched to me. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 04:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 04:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism and Islands. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unique house names in Maldives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No references since 2016, not notable. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 04:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maldives-related deletion discussions. Unilandofma(Talk to me!) 04:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unsure - on the one hand, I don't like the title or the unencyclopedic tone WP:NOTESSAY of the writing. On the other hand, this does appear to be a Thing. It might be a challenge to find notable sources, but it does depend if we collectively think it is worth doing here or better to WP:TNT and get whoever recreates it to ensure there is proper sourcing. I'm doubting it is really possible for anyone outside of the Maldives to offer sources that meet the WP:GNG. JMWt (talk) 10:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. As you say, it does seem to be a Thing, and thus notable. As a comment, it used to be very common in the UK for house names to be the only addresses on envelopes. For example, my grandmother's address used to be just Catalone, Newton Abbot, South Devon. However, for obvious reasons the Post Office tried to eradicate this approach to addresses, and it has largely disappeared, except for people who live in castles or palaces. I expect the same practice existed in other countries, and probably still does in some. Athel cb (talk) 14:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Tendency (party politics) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:DICDEF and, as a disambiguation page, WP:PARTIAL. Geschichte (talk) 04:25, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (talk) 06:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:40, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - Tendencies have an important role for Trotskyites in particular that goes beyond dictionary definitions. If there are ways to improve the article so that it stops meeting WP:DICDEF then let me know. JASpencer (talk) 06:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Simon Hocquaux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable figure skater. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Skating, and France. Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:53, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Southern Derby (Serbia) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails GNG. C F A 01:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Serbia. Shellwood (talk) 02:17, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Myriam Leuenberger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable figure skater. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and Switzerland. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- 2002 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am also nominating the following related pages:
- 2003 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2004 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2005 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2006 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2007 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2008 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2009 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- 2010 Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Non-notable figure skating competition. Recommend deletion or redirect to Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Skating, and Bulgaria. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Here is my problem with these stand-alone articles. All four disciplines are often not contested. There are often not enough competitors to award a bronze medal, and in some cases, even a silver medal. Many of these competitions featured no more than two or three participants. And most of the competitors who are listed are redlinked or unlinked (ie. themselves not notable). The competition results and scores are included (or should be included) on a skaters' individual article. The medal results are included on the parent article (in this case, Bulgarian Figure Skating Championships). But these nations with small national championships are just not worth trying to maintain individual articles for each competition. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Files
[edit]Categories
[edit]NEW NOMINATIONS
[edit]Category:Brazilian people of African descent by ethnicity
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary level of intermediate categorization between Category:Brazilian people of African descent and just two subcategories for African ethnic groups. Both of the two subcategories here are already in Category:Brazilian people of Nigerian descent, meaning they're already appropriately subcategorized within that parent and thus need neither this nor upmerging to the parent. (One of the two subcategories, Category:Brazilian people of Igbo descent, also only has one person in it, and thus may not even be warranted at all if it can't be made more populated than it is. However, I'm just raising it for review, rather than nominating it for deletion here and now, as I don't know whether getting more articles into it is actually possible or not — but I will say that the fact that it's linking an Igbo Brazilians article that doesn't even exist at all as its purported "main article" head isn't promising.) Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Social media influencers
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Social media influencers to Category:Internet celebrities
- Nominator's rationale: merge, not a clear distinction between the two categories. This is follow-up on this discussion which is still open. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Smasongarrison, Hydrangeans, and The Bushranger: pinging participants to the other discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:00, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose merge, and oppose deletion. Thanks for the ping. Note the first sentence in the Influencer article states,
An influencer, also referred to as an online influencer and social media influencer, is a term traditionally associated with someone who is considered influential.
, while the first sentence in the Internet celebrity article states,An internet celebrity, also referred to as an internet personality, is an individual who has acquired or developed their fame and notability on the Internet.
The point here is that not all influencers are celebrities, e.g., LinkedIn influencers, etc. That said, if you haven't already, please ping and invite the folks at Wikipedia:WikiProject Internet culture to be part of the discussion on this topic as they're the gurus... allowing enough time after the holidays for a response. Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose merge, and oppose deletion. Thanks for the ping. Note the first sentence in the Influencer article states,
Category:People from Doubravice nad Svitavou
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 10:07, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
2100s and 2110s
[edit]- Propose deleting Category:2100s in film (1 C)
- Propose deleting Category:2100s works (1 C)
- Propose deleting Category:2100s in mass media (1 C)
- Propose deleting Category:2114 (1 C)
- Propose deleting Category:2110s in mass media (1 C)
- Nominator's rationale: merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory each. Merging isn't needed, the subcategories are kept in the decade tree anyway. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Deaths from cerebrovascular disease
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: containerize, the articles directly in this category are usually about people who died by stroke, which is a far too common cause of death to categorize by. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Leftover mosques categories
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 1678 (1) to Category:Mosques completed in the 1670s and Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1678
- Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 1677 (1) to Category:Mosques completed in the 1670s and Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1677
- Propose merging Category:Mosques completed in 1675 (1) to Category:Mosques completed in the 1670s and Category:Buildings and structures completed in 1675
- Nominator's rationale: Follow-up to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 December 12#Mosques 1200-1900; three single-member categories which were inadvertently excluded from the list. BlasterOfHouses (HouseBlaster's alt • talk • he/they) 06:43, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Merge per precedent. They are new categories created after the nomination in the previous discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Cestidae
[edit]- Propose merging Category:Cestidae to Category:Cestida
- Nominator's rationale: Cestida is a monotypic order, containing only the family Cestidae. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Deceased Everest summiters
[edit]- Nominator's rationale: Selective merge. These are just summiters who are now deceased. For example, Rick Allen (mountaineer) died on K2. Gary Ball died on Dhaulagiri. SMasonGarrison 01:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Split per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Split We do not categorize people by being dead, nor do we subcategorize Category:Living people. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 14:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Category:Deaths on Scottish mountains
[edit]- Propose renaming Category:Deaths on Scottish mountains to Category:Mountaineering deaths in Scotland
- Nominator's rationale: From looking at the deaths, these are all Mountaineering deaths. Sibling is Category:Mountaineering deaths in Nepal. This is boardline CDC SMasonGarrison 01:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Rename per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Redirects
[edit]Zhwe with breve
[edit]- Zhwe with breve → Abkhaz alphabet (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
No mention in article from what I can see. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Did
[edit]- Did → Dissociative identity disorder (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
It's not clear whether or not any primary subject has been specified. KOLANO12 3 14:18, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Kitty cat
[edit]Possible WP:XY scenario here as Kitten could also be a plausible target. (In fact, Kitten actually was the target for 4 years between 2013-2017) User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The word "Kitty" appears seven times on Cats and the Internet - six of those references are to adult cats, only one to a kitten. And let us not forget "Kitty Cat Dance", more famous than any of them but deemed non-notable in 2007 (AfD discussion), which was about an adult cat. Tevildo (talk) 12:04, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
GX9
[edit]- GX9 → Gugudan (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
- Gx9 → Gugudan (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
There's a camera model called the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX9 which is commonly called the GX9 for short, and if I google "GX9", the majority of the search results on the front page are for the camera model and not the music group (which has been disbanded since several years ago). Now I'm just not sure whether to turn GX9 (all upper-caps) into a disambiguation page or to retarget it to the camera model. — AP 499D25 (talk) 07:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Six-a-side cricket
[edit]- Six-a-side cricket → Hong Kong Cricket Sixes#Match rules (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Hong Kong Cricket Sixes isn't the only tournament in this format, for example SEA Games also had the six-a-side format. Must be retargeted to a neutral target such as Short form cricket. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 05:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
2024 South Korean Christmas coup attempt
[edit]- 2024 South Korean Christmas coup attempt → 2024 South Korean martial law crisis (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Not referred to in this way either in target or in the news, did not happen on Christmas. Rusalkii (talk) 04:31, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Clear delete seefooddiet (talk) 05:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Mayflower wedge
[edit]- Mayflower wedge → 2014 Mayflower–Vilonia tornado (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Phrase not mentioned in target. Quick google suggests that this is most commonly a type of shoe; I was only able to find one source referring to the tornado this way. Rusalkii (talk) 04:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep (as redirect creator) - National Weather Service calls it a "wedge tornado". I've added it to the article. EF5 14:36, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Olive Delights
[edit]- Olive Delights → All of the Lights (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Meme referencing the sound of "All of the Lights", not mentioned in target and a quick google suggests it's sometimes used to refer to a food. Rusalkii (talk) 04:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Meat and potatoes
[edit]- Meat and potatoes → wiktionary:meat and potatoes (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
This is currently a soft redirect to Wiktionary, which discusses this solely as an idiom. However, this is also a culinary term referring to a class of dishes (see Category:Meat and potatoes dishes, so I don't think the Wiktionary entry covers all of what would be needed here. Hog Farm Talk 03:41, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Goth (Silverwing)
[edit]- Goth (Silverwing) → Kenneth Oppel (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
This no longer has a mention and the redirect is confusing. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- Retarget to Silverwing (TV series) where the character is mentioned. Tevildo (talk) 20:03, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
- I would oppose this retarget. A character in a book is different from a character in a TV show based on a book. Obviously the current target is no good, but since this character is not mentioned at Silverwing (novel), I think deletion is better. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 00:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 01:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Templates and Modules
[edit]Not the highest level, insufficient links to player articles The Banner talk 13:01, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Single use template, just two links to player articles. The Banner talk 12:59, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Most of the stuff on this navbox have their own navboxes as well. No navigational purposes for all of these together. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 12:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Infobox US political party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Infobox political party (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Propose merging Template:Infobox US political party with Template:Infobox political party.
Nothing special with the US version of this template A1Cafel (talk) 07:27, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Only two links. Award was created in 2022 and so far only two winners. Wait until after four or five series have been awarded. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:47, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
All links outside the title article are redirects. The event does not take place until October 2025. Can be recreated when there are articles. Created way too early. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- The template has future use and currently the articles are blanked and will be brought back. It's way too early but a sport event can exist an year before. Sid Prayag (talk) 12:18, 25 December 2024 (UTC)