Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Arts and entertainment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Arts and Entertainment Work Group

The Arts and Entertainment Work Group is a working group of members of the Biography WikiProject dedicated to ensuring quality and coverage of biography articles.


Related Projects

Since biographies are potentially under the purview of almost all WikiProjects, it is important that we work in tandem with these projects. Also, when seeking collaboration on articles, don't neglect to approach WikiProjects that are part of the geographical region your subject is/was in.

Related Portals

Increase the exposure of our work group by nominating our articles for their Portal FA and DYKs... Specific discipline portals are listed in that section.

Navigation
Articles
Announcements/To Do (edit)
  • Notability questioned:
  • FAC:
  • FAR:
    • none
  • FARC:
    • none
  • GA Noms:
  • Review:
    • none
  • Article requests::
  • John_Buscema: There's a debate between the current version and this version - http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=John_Buscema&oldid=181851662 - requesting input to arrive at a consensus integrating both versions.
  • Pierce O'DonnellCalifornia's 22nd congressional district candidate[1] Los Angeles lawyer Buchwald v. Paramount screenwriter [2] author ISBN 1-56584-958-2 ISBN 0-385-41686-5 [3] California Fair Political Practices Commission[4][5][6][7]
  • William Ely Hill (1887-1962) - Illustrator, created artwork for the book covers for F. Scott Fitzgerald and had a regular entry in the New York tribune along with being published on numerous occasions.
  • Misc:

Add this to-do list to your User page! {{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Arts and entertainment/Announcements}}

Directions for expanding any division below

[edit]

The general outline and collection has been started, but if you would like to expand and organize a discipline, here's what you do. Right below the page heading for the discipline insert this: {{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Work groups/Division banner}} and save. This will put a rough outline together for you and then you can edit it to conform to your area. See Writers and critics below for an example. If your project grows large enough where it's taking up a good portion of this page, you should probably move it to a subpage of this page.

You might also want to make a Members section for people to join your specific area!

Tagging articles

[edit]

Any article related to this work group should be marked by adding |a&e-work-group=yes to the {{WPBiography}} project banner at the top of its talk page. This will automatically place it into Category:Arts and entertainment work group articles. Articles can be assessed for priority within this work group by using the |a&e-priority= parameter. See Template:WikiProject Biography/doc for detailed instructions on how to use the banner.

Members

[edit]
  1. I am ready to work on the biography articles of Indian or Biography actors Jogesh 69 (talk) 15:00, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. come help with the Bronwen Mantel article Smith Jones 22:16, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Lovelaughterlife (talk · contribs) Worked extensively on some biographies; reverted vandalism some others
  4. Francoisalex2 (talk · contribs)
  5. Dovebyrd (talk · contribs)
  6. Artventure22 (talk · contribs)
  7. Truth in Comedy (talk · contribs)
  8. Warlordjohncarter (talk · contribs)
  9. DENAMAX (talk · contribs) Maxim Stoyalov
  10. Ozgod (talk · contribs)
  11. Eremeyv (talk · contribs)
  12. Susanlesch (talk · contribs), mostly inactive
  13. EraserGirl (talk) 03:43, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Shruti14 (talk · contribs) will help when I can
  15. Jubileeclipman (talk · contribs) I am interested in taking on UK celebrities with articles that are stubs or otherwise non-standard. Entirely rewrote Fearne Cotton to raise standard and remove fansite tag. I am working on Holly Willoughby which was merely a list plus trivia. Will also work on musicians, all genre, living or dead.
  16. Jarhed (talk · contribs) 21:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Mvzix (talk · contribs)
  18. Cassianto (talk · contribs)
  19. Iamthecheese44 (talk · contribs)
  20. Georgiasouthernlynn (talk · contribs)
  21. Fitindia (talk · contribs)
  22. BabbaQ (talk · contribs)
  23. Woodstop45 (talk · contribs)
  24. Willthacheerleader18 (talk · contribs)
  25. The Eloquent Peasant (talk · contribs)
  26. Lopifalko (talk · contribs)
  27. Terasaface (talk) 03:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC) Working on BLP of artists primarily working in the fields of Studio craft[reply]
  28. Corachow (talk · contribs)
  29. Yorubaja (talk · contribs) 14:23:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC) [reply]
  30. Ms Kabintie (talk · contribs)
  31. JamesNotin (talk · contribs)
  32. Ppt91 (talk · contribs)
  33. Slacker13 (talk · contribs)

General

[edit]

Infoboxes

[edit]

Requested articles

[edit]

Actors

[edit]

Architects

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:


Illustrators

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Painters

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Photographers

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Sculptors

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Comics artists

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Visual arts deletions

[edit]
Visual arts deletion sorting discussions


Visual arts

[edit]
Inyo Council for the Arts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, perma-stub without any sources since 2006, since I couldn't find any sources that aren't part of a connected organization themselves, it is likely to remain a perma-stub. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Frederic Swigert Jr. Memorial Fountain (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear in any RS, other than a single entry listing it at the Smithsonian Institute. Should be merged into "Oregon Zoo." PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 15:10, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Salma Arastu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable WP:Notability, with most information sourced from subject's own resume —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 04:19, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TJ Norris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe TJ Norris meets notability guidelines, either general or for artists. This page has somehow survived more than a decade without a single reference listed, and I can currently only find one: this 2013 article about Norris being hired by an art museum. According to the News section of his website, his work has been featured in various publications and festivals, none of which are particularly notable.

There was a previous AfD that resulted in a "keep" in 2007, but the discussion was partially hijacked by sockpuppets or meatpuppets whose accounts were created the same day and only ever edited that AfD: Soapsnydler (talk · contribs), SnyderStephanie (talk · contribs), and Kevredmond (talk · contribs). Iiii I I I (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The Google searches are clear that he is not the most notable person called TJ Norris and that at least one other person might have a better claim to this article title. He also does not seem to be more than very minimally notable even if you try to see past that. Adding "artist" to the searches turns up some passing mentions. The only even slightly substantial thing I found was this, which focuses on his appointment as a curator and, even the, its not much. That's nothing like enough. The books, discography and awards are not impressive. The monograph was published through a publisher that does not have an article. Factor in the promotional intent and the past COI editing and... there's no hope for this. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:51, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Quite aside from being created by COIs and SPAs, saved at deletion by SPAs, kept out of one of those all-too-typical headcount over policy 2000s closes, this is a fine example of something I call 0+0+0+0=0. Two dozen casual mentions do not equate to notability. Being published in non-notable, ephemeral publications does not equate to notability. Having one's work displayed in non-notable galleries and museums does not equate to notability. Getting non-notable awards from non-notable groups does not equate to notability. 0+0+0+0=0. Ravenswing 18:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Visual arts - Proposed deletions

[edit]

Visual arts - Images for Deletion

[edit]

Visual arts - Deletion Review

[edit]

Performing arts

[edit]

Comedians

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Dancers

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Directors

[edit]

Musicians

[edit]

Magicians

[edit]

Writers and critics

[edit]
Arts and Entertainment Work Group - Writers and critics

The Arts and Entertainment Work Group - Writers and critics is a working group of members of the Biography WikiProject dedicated to ensuring quality and coverage of biography articles.

Related Projects

Since biographies are potentially under the purview of almost all WikiProjects, it is important that we work in tandem with these projects. Also, when seeking collaboration on articles, don't neglect to approach WikiProjects that are part of the geographical region your subject is/was in.

Related Portals

Increase the exposure of our work group by nominating our articles for their Portal FA and DYKs. Of course, don't forget the main portal, Portal:Arts

FAs and GAs
Announcements/To do (edit)

Members

[edit]

Categories

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Comics writers

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Romance authors

[edit]

Lists

[edit]

Poets

[edit]
Click on "►" below to display subcategories:

Stubs

[edit]

Authors / Writers deletions

[edit]
Authors / Writers deletion sorting discussions


Authors

[edit]
Ullekh NP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of WP:SUSTAINED notability. Amigao (talk) 16:02, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

William Green (writer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see that any of the citations serve to establish notability TheLongTone (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TheLongTone - thank you for your long work on Wikipedia. I did not receive any sort of compensation for this article, but I probably should have disclosed that the subject was known to me as a friend-of-a-friend sort of thing. I thought based on the coverage in mainstream US media (Washington Post, Business Insider, Bank Rate) that the subject met notability requirements, and tried to write the article as well sourced and neutral as I could. I'll accept the decision of this page. 37and7 (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Gervais (psychologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted and salted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Gervais * Pppery * it has begun... 00:38, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Farouk Yousif (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one secondary source on the subject which is below the minimum set in the notability guidelines for people set out in WP:BIO. Abolishedtemple (talk) 18:37, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Christine Horner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found this page via the Fringe Theory Noticeboard. The issue there was that she promotes alternative methods for cancer prevention and treatment, and the article came across as if this is not a controversial thing to do. ie it's promo/fringe.

While looking for critical coverage of her, it became apparent to me that there actually isn't any, and that it's not actually clear why she should have a page. Her media appearances are fleeting and mostly decidedly local. Her one apparent claim to fame is that in the 1990s, she was part of a successful campaign for reconstructive breast surgery for breast cancer patients to be covered by insurance. The problem is, all the evidence for her having a prominent role comes back to her claims about herself in media, or a very short article she herself wrote in the American Journal of Surgery: Horner-Taylor, Christine (1998). "The breast reconstruction advocacy project: One woman can make a difference". The American Journal of Surgery. 175 (2): 85–86. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00271-7. ISSN 0002-9610. PMID 9515520.. When I looked for contemporaneous media coverage of the bill that got the surgery covered, it's (a) sparse, and (b) doesn't mention her. As far as I can see, she didn't win any prizes or awards for it, and her own article is unclear how big a role she played in the campaign. In short, I don't think she passes WP:ANYBIO. OsFish (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mal Fletcher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No independent sources. Most of the sources are organizations the article subject founded or worked on, such as Next Wave, 2020 plus, Edges tv, Youth Alive, their youtube channel. Two sources are interviews with the article subject. Two sources link to error pages, such as one titled "Oops". Truthnope (talk) 21:47, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Olesia Ostafiieva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely promotional page about a PR person created by UPE; the person doesn't pass GNG - holding not notable positions: PR specialist, secretary in the local council, editor in chief of not notable media. 89KimberlyRoad (talk) 11:39, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lenin Dev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable coverage exists for the subject that is independent of subject. it fails WP:GNG. Dam222 🌋 (talk) 02:55, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Boudriot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacking in real sources for WP:BIO, and no reviews that I can find for his book, Le vaisseau de 74 canons, for WP:AUTHOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Priya Malik (actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor/author etc. None of the sources cited contribute towards notability of any flavour, and BEFORE finds nothing better. (Also poorly referenced, eg. the entire 'Early life and education' section is supported by one cite to IMDb, but that's just by the by.) Fails WP:GNG / WP:BIO by some margin. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I'll add more citations to the 'Early life and education' section and work on improving the references overall. Thevikastanwar (talk) 17:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Salma Arastu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Questionable WP:Notability, with most information sourced from subject's own resume —Mint Keyphase (Did I mess up? What have I done?) 04:19, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sundus Abdul-Hadi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed draftification. Some work done prior to return to mainspace. However, as presented here I am not persuaded that Abdul-Hadi passes WP:BIO. Unsure that a further return to Draft will be beneficial 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 19:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Olsen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is about a person who wrote an investment advice book as a teenager. The first 3 references [14][15][16] are either self published or promoting the book, and the fourth [17] is a passing mention in which he comments on the success of a different teenage stockbroker. Spacepine (talk) 10:49, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Supporting deletion due to lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Article seems like intentionally promotional content.
Boredintheevening (talk) 12:40, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
TJ Norris (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe TJ Norris meets notability guidelines, either general or for artists. This page has somehow survived more than a decade without a single reference listed, and I can currently only find one: this 2013 article about Norris being hired by an art museum. According to the News section of his website, his work has been featured in various publications and festivals, none of which are particularly notable.

There was a previous AfD that resulted in a "keep" in 2007, but the discussion was partially hijacked by sockpuppets or meatpuppets whose accounts were created the same day and only ever edited that AfD: Soapsnydler (talk · contribs), SnyderStephanie (talk · contribs), and Kevredmond (talk · contribs). Iiii I I I (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. The Google searches are clear that he is not the most notable person called TJ Norris and that at least one other person might have a better claim to this article title. He also does not seem to be more than very minimally notable even if you try to see past that. Adding "artist" to the searches turns up some passing mentions. The only even slightly substantial thing I found was this, which focuses on his appointment as a curator and, even the, its not much. That's nothing like enough. The books, discography and awards are not impressive. The monograph was published through a publisher that does not have an article. Factor in the promotional intent and the past COI editing and... there's no hope for this. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:51, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Quite aside from being created by COIs and SPAs, saved at deletion by SPAs, kept out of one of those all-too-typical headcount over policy 2000s closes, this is a fine example of something I call 0+0+0+0=0. Two dozen casual mentions do not equate to notability. Being published in non-notable, ephemeral publications does not equate to notability. Having one's work displayed in non-notable galleries and museums does not equate to notability. Getting non-notable awards from non-notable groups does not equate to notability. 0+0+0+0=0. Ravenswing 18:01, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Akila Muthuramalingam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can see, the subject of the article doesn't fit [WP:PROF] also failed GNG Zdrada (talk) 20:51, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 18:48, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pegine Echevarria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

She fails WP:GNG despite 46 refs in the article. Most of them are not independent or quick mentions. Promotional and not enough for notability. Ynsfial (talk) 15:29, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep thanks to the significant coverage in the New York Times article and Business Journal articles ThomasHarrisGrantsPass (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
John Doc Fuller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant and sustained coverage. His book is not notable. Being Martha Stewart's coach in prison doesn't make you notable. Ynsfial (talk) 15:19, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Kishor Kawathe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR. Taabii (talk) 15:07, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 18:47, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Umm Aktham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this person is notable enough. I couldn't find enough reliable sources to prove its notability. فيصل (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Qatar. فيصل (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and Women. WCQuidditch 02:20, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Of all nation-states, Qatar has the lowest proportion of women biographies: under 8%, according to humaniki. It feels like there's some WP:Systemic bias here, which was why I created the page. Dsp13 (talk) 11:42, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I have found and added several sources, which are overviews of Arab women writers and literature, tertiary sources rather than secondary. The content within them about this writer is short, but the fact that they include her, and the way they write about her writing, leads me to think that secondary sources exist. The last source currently in the article, at magazine.jouhina.com, is unfortunately a deadlink and not archived (as far as I have been able to find). From what I can see on the Wayback Machine of other articles in that magazine, it would have included critique of her writing, by the author of the article and others, and biographical detail, and would certainly count as SIGCOV. Perhaps a WP editor will have access to it offline. I have tried googling her Arabic name (I do not read or speak Arabic!), and there is one source the title of which translates as Writers from the Arabian Gulf, with the content described as "Arab authors; women Arab authors; Persian Gulf countries; biography." Even if I could read Arabic, only a snippet view is available on Google Books, but if anyone has access to أدباء وأديبات من الخليج العربي offline, it may also be useful. RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:09, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 02:48, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jeffrey Gitomer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure if he is notable. Most of sources seem to be either primary or only tangentially related to him. I am unsure whether he meets WP:CREATIVE; points 3 and 4 are relevant. I am not sure if the attention he got was critical and whether his work has been covered in enough periodical articles. (I see [19], but not much more.) Even if The Little Red Book of Selling had made him notable, he would seem to be a bit too BLP1E-ish, as the rest of the coverage is more-or-less trivial or primary. Janhrach (talk) 15:15, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:45, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I see plenty of good sources. I remember the incident that lead to his being banned from the airline, so BLP1E doesn't apply. There are issues with the article, but they can be resolved through ordinary editing. Bearian (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Don Libes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, because there is no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Most references are primary or technical sources rather than in-depth third-party discussions of Don Libes himself. The article reads more like a CV than an appropriate Wiki biography Neurorocker (talk) 02:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Their Google Scholar page seems to sufficiently demonstrate their notability as an academic. Madeleine (talk) 03:03, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rajlukshmee Debee Bhattacharya (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from the cited links, I couldn't find much info on the web supporting notability. Soumyapatra13 (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Garuda Talk! 13:37, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 22:16, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I have added some info and a reference, and will continue looking for more. Like Eddie891, I think having an obit in Indian Literature and being described as "a major voice in Indian poetry and women's writing" in My Birth Was Not In Vain: Selected Poems by Seven Bengali Women are good indications that she is notable and that there is more coverage. She published many poems in Bengali, and there is likely to be coverage in Bengali language sources (not Bengali Wikipedia), and other languages of the subcontinent. Frustratingly, many of the English language sources which come up in a Google Books source are snippet view only. I hope someone with access to relevant hardcopy sources will add more. RebeccaGreen (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Authors proposed deletions

[edit]

Tools

[edit]
Main tool page: toolserver.org
Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...
  • Reflinks - Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references
  • Checklinks - Edit and repair external links
  • Dab solver - Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
  • Peer reviewer - Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.