User talk:Rahmatula786

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Christian Fürchtegott Gellert

added a link pointing to Extraordinary

Engkilili (state constituency)

added a link pointing to Assembly

Eros (concept)

added a link pointing to Relationship

Heritable jurisdictions

added a link pointing to Compensation

Pirometer Plant

added a link pointing to Electronic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nicholas Ross (cricketer)

added links pointing to Score and Debut

World Trade Centre Kuala Lumpur

added links pointing to Convention and Venue

Christian Fürchtegott Gellert

added a link pointing to Extraordinary

Desmond Keegan

added a link pointing to European civilisation

Engkilili (state constituency)

added a link pointing to Assembly

Eros (concept)

added a link pointing to Relationship

From Here on OUT

added a link pointing to President

Heritable jurisdictions

added a link pointing to Compensation

Kuijõe

added a link pointing to Western

Leichosila

added a link pointing to Schmidt

Santi Benedetto e Scholastica

added a link pointing to Church

Sir Gareth Rhys Williams, 3rd Baronet

added a link pointing to Codner

Tamás Harle

added a link pointing to Commission

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Nicholas Ross (cricketer)

added links pointing to Score and Debut

Desmond Keegan

added a link pointing to European civilisation

Leichosila

added a link pointing to Schmidt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

you can't redirect Ministry of Health (Koshi Province) and Ministry of Economic Affairs and Planning (Koshi Province) 2400:1A00:BD20:3BB8:D595:1712:A588:12C6 (talk) 07:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI this is Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anup Rajbanshi. C F A 18:27, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

G11 on Kiran Bajracharya

Hello Rahmatula786 -- I've declined this speedy because the article is not unsalvageably promotional, although the tone does need attention. Please re-read the G11 rubric before nominating under this criterion again. If you consider that notability is a problem then I'd suggest Articles for Deletion, so that all the available sources can be examined fully. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 08:03, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Rahmatula786 (talk) 08:08, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Deletion Discussion for Article Ram Krishna Bantawa

Hi Rahmatula786,

I hope this message finds you well.

Thank you for raising concerns about the article on Ram Krishna Bantawa. I firmly believe the article meets the requirements outlined in Wikipedia’s WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV guidelines. Below is an explanation supporting this assertion:

Notability as an Author (WP:NAUTHOR):

Ram Krishna Bantawa is a recognized author and lyricist in Nepali literature. He is known for his novel Saghan Tuwanlo (Shrill Mist) and novel Amalai Chithi (Letter to Mother-whose English translation is forthcoming.) His work has made a significant cultural impact, particularly within the Nepali community.
His lyrics and songs are available on platforms such as YouTube.
Saghan Tuwanlo is included in the curriculum of Tribhuvan University, highlighting its academic and cultural significance.His novels address meaningful societal issues such as women’s rights, untouchability, and Sati Pratha (the practice of widow immolation), further emphasizing his contributions to literature and social discourse.

Significant Coverage (WP:SIGCOV):

Independent and reliable media outlets, including Kantipur, Annapurna Post, and various Hong Kong-based Nepali newspapers, have provided coverage of Bantawa’s work. This demonstrates his influence in Nepali literature and music.
He has been featured in interviews and podcasts that delve into his life, literary contributions, and societal impact, providing further evidence of significant independent coverage.
Bantawa has received several awards and certificates from reputable organizations, including:Nepalese Literary Academy Hong Kong , Heavenly Path Hong Kong , Charu Sahitya Pratisthan , Hong Kong Nepalese Federation , Lyricist Association of Nepal

The article references independent and verifiable sources that discuss Ram Krishna Bantawa’s work in detail. Taken collectively, these factors satisfy the standards for inclusion in Wikipedia under WP:NAUTHOR and WP:SIGCOV.

If additional information or sources are required to further support this assertion and enhance the article, I would be happy to assist.

Best regards,

Rasil Shrestha

Rasilshrestha (talk) 09:55, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2001 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol

added a link pointing to Edition

Jocks Pond Outlet

added a link pointing to Flow

SS City of Brunswick

added a link pointing to Freighter

Wakkund

added a link pointing to Southern

Zou Qiang

added a link pointing to Portion

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New message from RationalPuff

[[1]]

Thank you for your effort to contribute to the article. However, please avoid removing content from the article without first consulting the talk page. There are plenty of discussions on the talk page that might be helpful. Thank you. RationalPuff (talk) 13:23, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Hello, I'm RationalPuff. I noticed that you recently removed content from Biswaroop Roy Chowdhury without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please refrain from editing the article without first discussing your proposed changes on the Wikipedia talk page. Remember, Wikipedia is not a platform for personal viewpoints or how we might prefer things to be presented. Instead, it is a collaborative effort to lay out factual information supported by reliable references. RationalPuff (talk) 20:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering why you are so much particular about this article. I am from Nepal, don’t know him personally, so no question of personal viewpoints. You are from india , u might have personal viewpoints. It’s interesting to see your response for this article. What i have done edit is not blanking, i have mentioned reasons. Rest what u talked , i agree . Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m pretty much on the same page as yours. The guy is a fraudster and a threat to public health. Much I wish would write about him and his fraudulent activities, but we must remember Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinions or perspectives. We can’t exclude or include information just because we agree/disagree. If there are reliable and verifiable sources supporting the content, it must be presented objectively without bias or deliberate omission. Hope makes sense.

Please feel free to suggest in the talk page what changes you are proposing, keeping in mind the points above.

Thanks. RationalPuff (talk) 16:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed Rahmatula786 (talk) 16:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2001 Copa de la Reina de Fútbol

added a link pointing to Edition

Wakkund

added a link pointing to Southern

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armand Hatchuel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enterprise.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Minister of Forests and Environment (Nepal)

Hi minister and ministry are separate title you understand for example Ministry of Defence (Australia) and Minister of Defence (Australia) more 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 14:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really worth in Nepalese context. Try to Make some useful articles and don’t focus on ministers, it looks like promotion of politicians. You should be aware of condition of country and help here to bring some good stuff . Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You edited unwanted articles without any information just say There is no need of such article . The information can be kept in the individual ministries. It incorrect due title Separate 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:10, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even you know what minister and ministry with any point you can decline. First known about it. 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:20, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know u have worked hard to write this draft. But sadly, it’s not in proper direction. Plz create an account and contribute to Wikipedia if ur really interested to bring genuine stuff and contribute to encyclopaedia. Otherwise don’t waste your time neither mine. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can also stop redirect ministry and minister or we maybe blocked 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:28, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn’t understand what you are trying to convey. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:32, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I worried in future your username might blocked due unnecessary writing and redirect some articles from example like Ministry of Health (Koshi Province) because it against policy because everyone Nepal's province has separate ministry to understand Nepal politics. 2001:DF7:BE80:1A5D:CDAE:4F73:8E3A:5E3E (talk) 15:36, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggestions and concerns. I am active in Wikipedia to stop paid and promotional contents in Nepal and remove all non sense stuff from Wikipedia in Nepal. If you have any thing genuine. Plz make a draft and see my response. I am not worried for my future till i am doing my job in good faith and being unbiased. Thank you and good night. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Need your guidance

Need your guidance on how to improve the article LunarFrosty (talk) 04:16, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Plz let me know how I can help you Rahmatula786 (talk) 05:05, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

for organization like university to meet notability, news article which are published on the news portal can be used for reliable source? LunarFrosty (talk) 05:46, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

you should have at least 2 sources having in depth coverage about organisation and should be neutral . Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanks for reply LunarFrosty (talk) 08:18, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Easterhouse Festival Society Review

Hi there, thanks for your review of Easterhouse Festival Society.

re your suggestion for how to improve, you mentioned a need for only relevant information, and neutral sources. I was just hoping for some clarification on which information you thought was irrelevant, and which sources you thought weren’t neutral. The last two reviewers both homed in on the section that I completely removed from this last submission as being the area which was problematic, so I took that all out, so it would be really helpful if you could let me know what else you think needs removed?

Re the sources, the current version has Scottish Tv, an academic thesis, an academic conference report, a published biography (not autobiography) of one of the Society members, the BBC, a local history site, The herald newspaper, the Glasgow times newspaper, and a Swedish culture think tank.

The Swedish culture think tank is a speech / an interview, so they wouldn’t count for notability purposes, but I would have thought that the other sources would have done that already? I could cut those two sources out completely too, but it would mean cutting out the entire “when and why did the Society finish its work” section, which, though short, brings the article to a neat close.

Thanks for your time. Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep key things only. You need to make the article almost 30-40% of it’s size at present. Make introduction short and relevant. Don’t keep unsourced lines or paragraphs. Best wishes. Rahmatula786 (talk) 07:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Florida International Boarding Higher Secondary School

Hello Rahmatula786. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Florida International Boarding Higher Secondary School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Educational insitutions are not in scope for A7. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Graded English Medium School

Hello Rahmatula786. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Graded English Medium School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is some issues with tone but not tot he point where deletion is warranted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School

Hello Rahmatula786, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy deletion nominations

Please read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion. I've just declined three of your requests. Can you please explain how Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School is unambiguous advertising. I note that user:Espresso Addict has previously advised you to read through what constitutes WP:G11. -- Whpq (talk) 14:39, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article states that the school was established in someone's home, which suggests that it was written by someone associated with the school, likely for promotional purposes. I understand that this situation involves a conflict of interest (COI), but I am unsure whether it meets the criteria for G11. Could you clarify this for me? I often struggle to differentiate between COI and advertising. If an article is written or commissioned specifically for promotional purposes, how should it be handled? Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:11, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Being founded in somebody's home is a statement of fact and is not an indication of conflict of interest. Apple Inc. was founded in the home of Steve Job's parents. G11 is unambiguous advertising that would need to be fundamentally rewritten ion order to be an encyclopedia article. All I see at Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School are statements of fact. Even if there is a conflict of interest, that does not automatically mean the text is promotional. If I founded the company PishPoshCo and wrote "PishPoshCo is a retailer established in 2011 selling small appliances and electronics goods. The company was founded with one store in Springfield, and expanded to a chain of 212 stores by the end of 2024.", that would not be advertising. On the other hand "PishPoshco is the leading retailer of small appliances electronics goods. You can go to any store to find the best deals!" would be. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for reply and addressing my concerns about it. Thank for your time. Now I understand it better and hope that my next steps will be more thoughtful as per your guidance. 🙏 Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My advice would be to completely ignore COI for tagging G11. The editors' motivations in writing are not relevant for G11; what is important is whether the text they have written is so promotional that, if one removes every overtly promotional statement, there would be nothing left. That is clearly not the case for Gyanjyoti Higher Secondary School. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

very clear. Thank you for your writing so long reply to clarify my doubts. I will follow as advised. Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Damak Model Higher Secondary School

Sources do not have to be neutral; they only need to be reliable. Only articles have to be neutral. I deprodded your prod. Bearian (talk) 04:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Rahmatula786,

After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group for a trial period of three months. Feel free to ask for permanent rollback after the three months, either on my talk page or at WP:PERM/R. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.

To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Review on the Draft:Aashiqana

Hi, you have rejected the draft through AFC with the reason Notability. But according to Wikipedia:Notability (films) The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics. There are more than 2 reviews on the series on national news portal(Times of India, Jagran, and Ott Play), also a detailed news on film companion Why you should watch Aashiqana. Kindly check these reference and re-review the draft. Thanks Jitujadab90 (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The given sources are not considered independent. Plz get additional sources and resubmit. Rahmatula786 (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May I know why the given sources are not considered independent? Jitujadab90 (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

declined Draft:4 SeasonS ( Film )

Hello Rahmatula786,

Now the draft is updated with plot and reference . All the 16 reference given were from standard magazines and movie websites talking about 4 Seasons. The movie's official website too is given.

Please review .

regards,

Vinod

Vinodkpn 15:05, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out to me. I will look into it and put my views. Rahmatula786 (talk) 15:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Hi 117.20.112.89 (talk) 23:32, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Draft Review

Hi! Could you please review the draft article about : Draft:Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth? Thanks! MH-wiki2025 (talk) 12:21, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

plz edit it as advised in comment. Rahmatula786 (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I've worked on the draft article for Draft:Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth and have tried to address the issues you raised. I've removed the promotional tone and replaced the unreliable sources. Could you please take another look? If it looks okay to you now, I'll go ahead and submit it. Thanks! MH-wiki2025 (talk) 12:30, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

still you have almost 50% unwanted stuff. keep the most essential matter required to justify the existence of this article. then resubmit. i may help to improve the article but it will be better if other reviewers also make their opinion. Rahmatula786 (talk) 12:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback, @Rahmatula786. I understand that the article still contains extraneous information. I appreciate you pointing this out. I will carefully review the current draft, focusing on retaining only the most essential details necessary to establish the organization's notability as a religious institution/registered trust/NGO. I will prioritize conciseness and ensure that all included information directly contributes to justifying the article's existence. After making these revisions, I will resubmit the draft. I also appreciate your offer to assist with further improvements and agree that input from other reviewers would be valuable. MH-wiki2025 (talk) 19:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth

Hello, I saw that you declined Draft:Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth with the reason "Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines", can you please let me know how can you decline submission of a religious organisation/Institution with this reason? Waiting for your response. Taabii (talk) 13:11, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing it out. It was a mistake in selecting the reason from the drop down. Rahmatula786 (talk) 13:43, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahmatula786 Kindly ping when replying to someone. Okay, I understand. Try to give time while selecting the reason. Taabii (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you once again. I am really impressed with your contribution in Wikipedia. You are very active , quick but still doing quality work. Great . Best wishes. Rahmatula786 (talk) 16:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahmatula786 I really like to pass my free time here; someone may be benefitted from my free time. Taabii (talk) 18:56, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahmatula786 I believe Shree Datta Padmanabh Peeth meets WP:NORG. It has significant national recognition, as evidenced by its leader receiving the Padma Shri. Media coverage in reputable sources like the Times of India, Indian Express, Amar Ujala, and Deccan Herald further supports its notability. The organization also has a demonstrable historical impact, and its prominence is confirmed by government records. I respectfully request a reconsideration of the decline based on these verifiable references and the organization's notable influence. MH-wiki2025 (talk) 14:08, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You haven’t understood my suggestions. Plz read it once again and do accordingly. Rahmatula786 (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nitin Mehta

Thanks for your contributions in Wikipedia:Articles for creation, I just saw that you accepted Nitin Mehta. Do you think the subject is notable? The Ahmedabad Mirror doesn't have any byline, The Print is a Press Release, TOI is just Wikipedia:Passing mention. Rest of the references are not well, and there is no Significant Coverage. Kindly look at it and let me know, I'm waiting. Taabii (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone through the references and accepted it as per norms. Person is notable and has got enough coverage to support this. Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rahmatula786 I nominated it for Discussion, lets see. Taabii (talk) 18:57, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 01:12:43, 24 February 2025 for assistance on AfC submission by PrachiVyas27

PrachiVyas27 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Gaurav Dwivedi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Rahmatula786, Thank you for your time to review my draft. I am new to editing in Wikipedia, can you please guide me what links are considered as independent reliable sources. I will make corrections accordingly. Your guidance will be much appreciated. Thank you, Prachi Vyas PrachiVyas27 (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PrachiVyas27 (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It means sources in reputable media written by independent individual from neutral point of view. Don’t keep sources which have just mentioned name of individual. Don’t repeat sources with similar content. Don’t think number of sources makes your article stronger. Rather, sometimes it can be counterproductive. All the best. Rahmatula786 (talk) 01:59, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Rahmatula. I will review all the reference links and do corrections and resubmit for review. PrachiVyas27 (talk) 02:53, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes Rahmatula786 (talk) 02:58, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rahmatula,

I reviewed and removed some of the reference links citation. I kept the links which had review about Gaurav Dwivedi's work and links of his interviews and photos at press conferences and launch.

Gaurav Dwivedi has exhibit a variety of roles in movies, short films (which were featured in international film festivals) , TV series ,web series and commercials. He has played main lead , supporting roles and cameos also.

I request you to please review my draft and let me know if more corrections needed.

Thank you very much for your time!

Prachi Vyas PrachiVyas27 (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sure. i will see and give you feedback. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:08, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

wow that was quick reply. Thanks much ! PrachiVyas27 (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

still I find praise words. plz re write from NPOV. Dont quote media. reduce stuff. reduces sources where his name is just mentioned. best wishes. Rahmatula786 (talk) 06:41, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly review

Hi Rahmatula786,

I have modified the draft and would like you to review the below draft.

Draft:ICFAI University, Tripura LunarFrosty (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent declining of Draft:Rahul Kanwat

Hello. First, I appreciate you taking the time to reviewing this draft, even if it was to decline it. Anyway, since I had an issue with another similar draft (in other words, a draft for an article title that currently serves as a redirect) failing like this, I was curious if the version that I submitted was the article that is currently mentioned on the drafted page or if it was the predecesor to the article that was deleted and redirected. The other article I mentioned, Draft:John West (cricketer, born 1861), was vastly different from the one that got deleted and redirected, but the latter was the one that the editor apparently reviewed, based on what I read through talk page conversations. Back to this article, I just wanted to know which version you reviewed. I haven't resubmitted the article in the subject yet, but I want to get clarification on this before I do. I hope this made sense, because I am not good with talking to others... -- JustJamie820 (talk) 00:45, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed Rahul Kanwat draft which was submitted. If you have questions related with this case, i will try to answer. Rahmatula786 (talk) 01:16, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's the thing; I don't know if it submitted the draft I made with about 20 references or the one that someone else made that had just a few, which was the one that got redirected. With West, I got the impression that instead of my draft, the article someone else made that got redirected was what was submitted. Does that make sense? To me, it feels hard to explain. Anyway, the only reason I went to your talk page was to clarify what version of the article on Rahul Kanwat you reviewed, based on my experience with the draft on West. I have other questions if you reviewed the draft with 20-some references, but before I'll ask them, I will work on the article to add some polish to it, so that I'm not submitting the same draft twice. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 01:50, 2 March 2025 (UTC) (Sorry if this was confusing...)[reply]

So nice Rahmatula786 (talk) 02:09, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]