Jump to content

User talk:Grnrchst

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ivanka Trump

[edit]

@Grnrchst It's been quite some time since you reviewed my DYK nomination for a hook related to the above article. Well, I did ping the DYK admins but its still not been sent to the Preparation Area for appearing on the Main Page. Meanwhile, I have replaced the phrase you suggested with "was" as per your advice. Hoping to hear from you soon. Regards MSincccc (talk) 03:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MSincccc: Thanks for changing it. As for it getting into prep, just be patient. The admins have a lot of nominations to sort through, they'll get to yours (and mine) eventually. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Grnrchst It's been nearly two weeks since the article's hook was nominated for DYK. Apart from pinging the DYK admins, is there anything else we can do, or do we simply have to continue waiting? My concern isn't just about the time elapsed, but also the possibility of the nomination being overlooked. Looking forward to knowing from you. Regards MSincccc (talk) 08:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@MSincccc: The nomination is currently in the approved section, so it's not been overlooked. If you check the section, you'll see the admins have a lot of nominations to go through and your nomination hasn't been waiting that long in the grand scheme of things. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Joseph Déjacque

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joseph Déjacque you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Alexander Atabekian

[edit]

On 4 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alexander Atabekian, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alexander Atabekian published the first anarchist periodical in the Armenian language? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alexander Atabekian. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Alexander Atabekian), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (5 April 2024)

[edit]

Hey there everyone. Thought it might be interesting to try my hand at doing weekly updates about my work here, so I can better keep track of my progress and so anyone that's interested can read what I've worked on.

As Monday was April Fool's Day, I decided to make a fool of myself and put far too much time into researching the subject of killing baby Hitler. I remembered this public debate taking off some years back and was surprised to see just how much ethical and theoretical discussion it has generated, not only in public-facing websites and magazines, but in scholarly books and journals as well. I might make this an annual tradition going forward, depending on how many silly subjects have received significant coverage.

On Tuesday, I expanded the article on Gustave Lefrançais, whose short stub article had come to my attention due to an ongoing GA review on Joseph Déjacque. He was quite the interesting figure in early anarchist and socialist history.

On Wednesday, as part of Women in Red's S & T alphabet run: I wrote an article about Armenian academic Seta Kabranian-Melkonian, who I knew about tangentially from my past research on the First Nagorno-Karabakh War; I also wrote about Soledad Real, a Catalan communist that was active throughout the Francoist dictatorship, even after they had her imprisoned.

On Thursday, I expanded the article on José Pellicer Gandía, one of the leaders of the famous Iron Column that fought the Spanish Nationalists from Valencia to Aragon. It was rather sad to read about the way he died, having actually received clemency but without the authorities caring to enact it. An awful recurrent event during the Francoist regime.

On Friday, I wrote an article about Nelly Trumel, also for WiR's S & T run. Trumel managed to liberate herself from an abusive domesticity to become an active participant in France's feminist movement, both in her work for anarchist radio and as a painter, which symbolised her philosophy. She also liked potatoes, so she's in my good books for that alone.

Throughout the week, I've also been working through the above-mentioned review on Joseph Déjacque, I completed my own review of "Zombie" by The Cranberries (one of my favourite Grunge songs) and I have just opened a review on Iveta Radičová, Slovakia's first woman prime minister. Next week I'll be doing more work on writing articles about women, trying to tighten up some of my B-class articles that are close to GA and compiling sources for an upcoming major rework of the article on Voltairine de Cleyre.

All the best to you, both this week and the next, dear reader. See you next Friday. <3 --Grnrchst (talk) 15:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rosa Laviña

[edit]

On 6 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rosa Laviña, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the anarchist Rosa Laviña opened the first vegetarian restaurant in Tolosa? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rosa Laviña. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rosa Laviña), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Camilo Cienfuegos

[edit]

On 7 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Camilo Cienfuegos, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after his movement's victory in the Cuban Revolution, television broadcasts showed Camilo Cienfuegos (pictured) freeing parrots from birdcages, declaring that the birds had "a right to liberty"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Camilo Cienfuegos. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Camilo Cienfuegos), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Special Barnstar
Really fantastic work on Killing baby Hitler. Consider it may meet User:Bilorv/Challenges#Minimalist if you'd like to run it by GAN. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum. ♠ 17:28, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 April newsletter

[edit]

We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.

Our current top scorers are as follows:

Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (12 April 2024)

[edit]

This week I was very focused on improving our coverage of people that have been the Secretary General of the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo, which is work I will probably continue into the near future.

On Monday, for International Romani Day, I expanded our articles on: Helios Gómez, a Calé artist that designed many of the CNT's famous propaganda posters; and Mariano R. Vázquez, who led the CNT through the Spanish Civil War. It was interesting to read about these figures, how they influenced and were influenced by the events of their time, and how their Romani identity affected how they were seen and presented themselves. Unfortunately, I was unsurprised to see that some of Vázquez's closest colleagues treated him with such racist hostility. I hope to do more work on Romani revolutionary figures in the future, I'll put a pin in my calendar for next year!

On Tuesday and Wednesday, I spent a lot of time finding images of the various secretaries general of the CNT and filling out the list a bit more so we have a place to build our information base. I also expanded the article on Manuel Andreu from stub, so now we have a decent amount more info on the CNT's second sec-gen. It was fascinating to read about how the CNT was affected by and reorganised after its time in clandestinity, as well as how Andreu shifted over time from syndicalism to Catalan nationalism.

On Thursday, I wrote an article about Manuel Adame, who was apparently the sec-gen of the CNT in 1923 (will need to find more sources about this to confirm for certain). As with a lot of people that ended up in the Communist Party of Spain, his story was one of a spectacular rise and a dramatic fall; he was purged after he broke the party line. Throughout his life, he maintained a persistent dedication to trade unionism, in spite of any changes in his ideology or political party.

On Friday, I wrote an article about the Ush Zhuz, a very interesting Kazakh political party that blended Pan-Turkism and Pan-Islamism together with anarchism and socialism. I hadn't been exposed to a left-wing spin on Pan-Turkism before, but this party promoted it as a means to resist nationalism and unite Central Asia across ethnic lines. Their vision of a federal Central Asian republic didn't go as they appear to have hoped, as Stalin's nationalities commissariat divided the region up with borders that persist until this day and many of its members were killed during the Great Purge. I also continued my work on articles about Mariano Vázquez and Carlo Cafiero, which I nominate for GA soon.

Throughout the week I've also been continuing my reviews of GA articles and improving my GA nom of Joseph Déjacque, which I hope will be finished soon. Next week I'll be working on the article about Voltairine de Cleyre, probably doing more about the CNT sec-gens and attempting to contribute more to this month's Women in Red creations. Take care dear reader, have a wonderful weekend. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Killing baby Hitler

[edit]

On 13 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Killing baby Hitler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ethical dilemma of killing baby Hitler has been compared to the trolley problem? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Killing baby Hitler. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Killing baby Hitler), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 12:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 14,146 views (1,178.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of April 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For working hard and Killing baby Hitler :P Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 00:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Core Contest has now begun!

[edit]

The Core Contest has now begun! Evaluate your article's current state, gather sources, and have at it! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes; although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue work on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings and their prizes. Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 03:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Gren's weekly update (19 April 2024)

[edit]

Hello everyone, hope you're all doing well. This week my work has been a bit all o'er the place, so I'll be doing a topic-by-topic breakdown instead of a day-by-day one.

This week I began my work expanding the article on Voltairine de Cleyre. For some reason I researching things non-linearly, so I've started with her early and later life and am moving inwards from there. I also came across a lot of information about her family and friends, so expect new or expanded articles on them too over the coming month. This week, as I was looking at her early life, I ended up creating articles about her father Hector De Claire, mother Harriet De Claire and sister Adelaide D. Thayer. I'm looking forward to researching more about her, although I have to see, reading her biography has made me quite sad. De Cleyre was a troubled person that went through so much, both physically and emotionally. I hope I'll be able to communicate the full extent of her life well in the article as it expands.

Continuing on this months' Women in Red edit-a-thon, I have written an article about Dení Prieto Stock, a revolutionary woman who died fighting for the FLN during the Mexican dirty war. I also translated the Spanish Wikipedia articles on Sara Socas and Erika Dos Santos, originally authored by Zapipedia. I recently had the pleasure of seeing these two play live in concert, so I was more than happy to get articles about them both up on the English wiki. If you ever get the chance, do check out their music, I highly recommend it.

Returning to my work on the Spanish anarchists, this week I've come close to completing the article on Mariano R. Vázquez, which I think will be ready for GA with a bit of copy editing and after checking some other sources for more information. I also expanded the article about Ricardo Sanz García from stub, which was interesting, as I know so much about the Durruti Column and the Aragon front in broad strokes, but still know little about the finer details. I will probably expand this article more in the future, so stay tuned for more info on the man.

I also finally brought the article on Joseph Déjacque to good article status, thanks to the kind and helpful review by asilvering. There's a lot to be found in the biography of the founder of political libertarianism, and I hope I've done a good job communicating that. That's another vital article at GA status, go team! Next week, I plan to continue my work in each of these subject areas, working more on De Cleyre's biography, maybe expanding another article about a CNT leader and I'll be looking to write a series of articles about the Subbotina sisters. Best wishes to you this weekend, as always, dear reader. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the GA! I enjoyed reviewing it. -- asilvering (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (26 April 2024)

[edit]

I decided to do some themed days this week, in order to branch out some of my focus and write about areas I may not have otherwise.

Monday was Earth Day, so I decided to return to some previous work I had done on the article about green anarchism. I expanded it a bit more, here and there, writing about the different tendencies, its development over time and its overarching principles. It was rather interesting to read about, although I wish so many of these histories I was reading weren't quite so US-centric. In any case, the article is improving at a decent rate, I hope I can find some time to improve it even more soon.

Tuesday was St. George's Day, a national holiday in England and Catalonia, which the latter celebrates by distributing books. I thought what better way to cover all three of these themes than writing about Homage to Catalonia. I actually kinda dislike this book, or rather, I mostly dislike the way it gets put on a pedestal in anglophone circles as the be-all, end-all of Spanish Civil War histories. So I was very relieved to read how many historians agree with me on this, who think that the book works fine as an individual account, but shouldn't be taken as representative of the war as a whole. Another article I may have to revisit at some point, because I found the history of its reevaluation very interesting to read about.

Wednesday was Armenian genocide remembrance day. I wanted to write about something contextual for this, so I ended up writing about Christapor Mikaelian, the founder of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation who sought revenge for the Hamidian massacres by attempting to assassinate the Ottoman Sultan. He was quite the fascinating figure to read about, and his influence goes far beyond his name. In reading about him, I came across at least half a dozen people that lost their life in the genocide, or who would go on to seek revenge for it afterwards. It was an important reminder that no event exists in isolation, it always has years, even decades that lead up to it.

Thursday was liberation day in both Italy and Portugal, which both celebrated their overthrowing of fascism in each of their countries. I took the opportunity to write about an Italian and a Portuguese anti-fascist, respectively: Pietro Bruzzi, a partisan who was killed by the Nazis while fighting the fascists in his home region of Lombardy; and Mário Castelhano, a leader of the CGT that led a bunch of uprisings against the Estado Novo and was a vocal supporter of anti-colonialism and anti-racism (quite the exception during the 1920s/1930s!). After reading about these people that gave their lives struggling against dictatorship, I ended up watching the people of Porto singing Grândola, in a moving tribute to the anti-fascist revolution of 50 years ago. (You can watch it here)

Today I mostly did clean-up, as I discovered I have for months (possibly a year or two) been citing the wrong edition of a book in a bunch of different articles. It's not a terrible mistake, but it's nevertheless one I sought to correct, as it could have caused some embarrassing problems with verifying stuff that wasn't in its first edition. I also pushed a change onto the anarchy article, which had been sitting in my drafts for a while but which I never got around to adding. And I just wrote an article about Teresa Torrelles, who fits this month's Women in Red themes of T letters and women in health. I've now also begun preparations for a back-in-time-themed Women in Green edit-a-thon, which I'm excited to be a part of in the future. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:55, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Thank you for participating in the March 2024 GA backlog drive. Your noteworthy contribution (11.5 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 May newsletter

[edit]

The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.

The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:

The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (3 May 2024)

[edit]

This has been quite the week. Aside from my ongoing work to improve articles about Gaetano Bresci and Homage to Catalonia, I've been focused on three main themes this week.

For Women in Red's S&T edit-a-thon, which led into an Eastern Europe-focused event, I focused on creating new articles about the Subbotins, a revolutionary family of women who were involved in the Narodnik movement of the 1870s. The matriarch Sofya Subbotina must have had quite the influence on her daughters, Evgeniia, Maria and Nadezhda, because each of them were leading figures in various areas of the Narodnik movement and all of them were tried in the mass trials of Narodnik women.

After some research, as an article did not yet exist about him in either the Spanish or Catalan Wikipedias, I wrote an article about Francesc Arín, who was secretary general of the CNT during the fall of the Primo de Rivera dictatorship and rise of the Second Spanish Republic. I'd only read little about the treintistas before this, and usually from sources that were decidedly unsympathetic to them, so it was interesting to see how his trajectory developed over time. This is certainly one of the more overlooked members of the CNT, relative to how influential he ended up being.

While continuing my work on Voltairine de Cleyre, I ended up writing a biography about one of her lovers, Thomas Hamilton Garside. This was quite a fun research expedition, as the British and American sources on him are almost entirely disconnected: the American sources tend to act like he vanished off the face of the earth, the moment he left the United States; while the British sources almost entirely ignore his involvement in the labour movement, instead focusing on his later work as a liberal reformer. I'm not sure where else to look for other sources on him, as I think I exhausted most of my avenues, but hopefully I can dig more up about his activities with the ILP during the 1890s and 1900s.

I made sure to take 1 May off, as International Workers' Day is a public holiday where I live. It's always good to take a moment to appreciate myself as a worker and recognise the value I create in what I do. Next week, I'll probably end up writing a bit about Dyer Lum and more on Voltairine de Cleyre, while also trying to put the final touches on the Bresci article for its peer review. All the best to you, dear reader. :) --Grnrchst (talk) 15:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thank you for writing those narodnik articles! The Fritschi circle has been on my to-do list for a while, and now I can at least blue-link the Subbotina sisters! (Now, if you wanted to take this draft off my hands... I've moved it to draftspace just now.) -- asilvering (talk) 17:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'd have to look more into it first! I only got a tangential view of the circle from reading about the sisters, as Porter doesn't go too deep into it. Grnrchst (talk) 17:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But of course! Even just tossing in half-finished sentences and notes about what sources might be useful is a step forward, since there's barely anything in the draft at this point. -- asilvering (talk) 19:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Drafted barnstar for WiG editathon

[edit]

Hi Grnrchst! Normally, I go to WomenArtistUpdates for updated barnstar graphics (they do excellent graphic design work for both WiG and WiR), but it turns out that WAU is on an extended wikibreak right now -- so I've attempted to make a barnstar myself. What do you think? Could this work? Best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 22:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! This looks amazing, thanks so much Alanna :D --Grnrchst (talk) 09:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! Glad to help. :-) Alanna the Brave (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Alanna the Brave: When do you think would be the best time for me to start sending out invites? I can start whenever, I just want to find the a balance for keeping it fresh in people's minds while also giving them enough prep time. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe early next week? I'd say definitely give invitees 2-3 weeks notice. If you'd like to do this by requesting a mass-mailout to the WiG mailing list, you'll need to (1) update the WiG mailing list with any new members who have joined since last October, (2) paste the new editathon invitation contents to a new section on the mailing list talk page, and (3) request a mass message mail-out. One note: make sure the invite is error-free before any mail-out request (I've learned through painful experience!). Let me know if you'd like me to check/assist with anything. Alanna the Brave (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Core Contest is halfway through!

[edit]

Hello Core Contest participants, we've officially hit the halfway mark! With just over three weeks remaining until the May 31 deadline (23:59 UTC), it's time to ramp up our efforts. Remember, Wikipedia wants to be edited!

Now is a good time to set goals for your article: What section needs the most improvement? Which sources remain unused? How can you best spend your time? Good luck and happy editing! Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 02:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Gren's weekly update (10 May 2024)

[edit]

I've been trying to relax a bit this week, but I still think I got a good amount done.

On the de Cleyre front, I've gotten another section of her biography written, along with articles about her son Harry de Cleyre and his father James B. Elliott. I also rewrote the article on Dyer Lum, which I felt obliged to do seeing as I'm responsible for it losing its GA rating. Lum was quite the interesting character to look into, as someone that ended up being related to a tonne of different movements throughout his life. I'll still need to add more information about his role in the Haymarket affair before I renominate it. The further along I get with de Cleyre herself, the more I'm realising I'll need to make some big cuts once I get closer to the finished product. There's just so much to write about her and her prose is so well written it's hard to get it down to summary style.

For Women in Red's Eastern Europe drive, I translated the article on Esther Porter, authored by Mikelzubi, from the Spanish Wikipedia. I also got a starter article about Ksenia Ge written, although I haven't gone too far into the sources that give a deeper look at her life. These are two women in history that I've mostly heard of in relation to their male relatives, so I was happy to read more about them and their involvement in Patagonia Rebelde and the Russian Civil War respectively. I hope to look more into both of them at some point.

I've also been trying to help out with the Anarchism WikiProject's cleanup drive, which has so far involved the unglamorous work of seeing to the dreaded "citation needed" tags. Next week, I'll continue my work on de Cleyre and her associates, and hopefully do some upkeep on a couple ideology/movement articles I've had my eye on. Have a lovely weekend everyone. :) --Grnrchst (talk) 14:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Joseph Déjacque

[edit]

On 11 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Déjacque, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 1850s New Orleans, the French revolutionary Joseph Déjacque called for black slaves and the white working class to overthrow the United States in a social revolution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Déjacque. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Déjacque), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your WikiCup submission: Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Déjacque

[edit]

Hi Grnrchst, thanks for participating in the WikiCup. You recently submitted Template:Did you know nominations/Joseph Déjacque for DYK points, but unfortunately it is not eligible for DYK points because it was nominated to DYK as a newly promoted GA. I know this can be disappointing, but Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring#Did you know? states that only newly created or expanded DYKs are eligible for DYK points. The rules specifically exclude DYK submissions from receiving points if their appearance on DYK is solely because the article was a newly promoted GA. Epicgenius (talk) 00:17, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note about anarchism

[edit]

This is from User:Carptrash. I have been cut out (not blocked) from signing on as me so am reduced to doing this. It seems to involve my computer because I can sign on elsewhere, so it is not my account. My last year has been fraught with medical issues, for example I am just back from a several hour chemo session, so, after almost 20 years of editing, wikipedia has slipped down my list of "to dos." But I do appreciate hearing from you, I discovered anarchism when I wrote a high school term paper on it in 1967 and found myself thinking, "that's me" and pretty much still feel the same way, though my days of taking to the streets are over. If you feel like responding please do so at carptrash. Einar aka carptrash aka 2600:8800:590F:8600:4D1D:C7F2:CD1F:76E5 (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note and I am taking as good care as is possible. carptrash aka 2600:8800:590F:8600:4D1D:C7F2:CD1F:76E5 (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well now you have me reading various anarchist articles and I discovered that I'd posted the tombstone picture for Voltairine de Cleyre, taken during the 100th anniversary of Haymarket. Surprise! 2600:8800:590F:8600:4D1D:C7F2:CD1F:76E5 (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June GAs

[edit]

Dear Gren, I would like to learn more about good articles as I have no experience with them and am not very experienced generally. Also I actually have limited time in June so you may rather that I was not involved! But if you don't mind me using the bit of time I have to learn about GAs, then I would like to have a look at Mary Jane Patterson, American educator, unless someone else has got to her first? But also happy to work with someone else if they wanted to share her. I am in the WiR project normally. Balance person (talk) 07:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Balance person: Hey! This is no problem at all, we´d be delighted to have you on board! If you want any notes once you have worked on the article and want to know if it´s ready for GA, feel free to ask someone at WiG to take a look! We could give you a 20-minute-review for it. I look forward to seeing your work on Patterson! --Grnrchst (talk) 15:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the warm welcome! Balance person (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Gren,
I have had a go at Mary Jane Patterson and hope that I have improved the page a little. I do not think it is ready for GA yet though. Partly because of her era, sex, colour, there is just not that much hard info that I can find to fill out the story. Most sources that I have checked just repeat the same stuff. And I am not sure how much I could go into historical context of Black American educational lack of opportunity etc without getting way off her as an individual. So I would be grateful if you could take a look and suggest how I might proceed? Only if/when you have time of course! Thanks if you can! Balance person (talk) 10:13, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Balance person: Hey. When looking for sources, I think Google Scholar is an invaluable resource for finding them. On searching for "Mary Jane Patterson" "educator", it turned up many sources, some about the history of African American women in education, others about Patterson herself. I'd highly recommend looking through some of the sources listed here. --Grnrchst (talk) 11:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That is a great tip, thanks Gren! And I hope your next week is a lot better than your past one. Balance person (talk) 11:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Gren,
I have been working on Mary Jane Patterson. I am away the first week of June. So, whenever it is convenient, I would be grateful if someone in WiG could let me know what would need to be done to get it a little farther on. Thanks so much for your Google Scholar idea. I will be using that from now on on everything I edit! My research skills are still developing, as you can see! But I am very happy to learn. Balance person (talk) 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Balance person: Feel free to submit it for a 20-minute assessment. There's three experienced reviewers there that would be happy to point to where you can improve things further. Personally, I don't think it's quite there yet, as there are still a couple sections that aren't cited. The quotation in the early life section also strikes me as confusing, as it's not made clear what or who is being quoted here. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:15, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Gren. I will put it in and then work on it again on my return! Balance person (talk) 07:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gren,
I have worked on Mary Jane Patterson again after receiving a very useful 20 minute assessment. I am now trying to learn how to submit it for a Good Article review. I hope I do it correctly! Balance person (talk) 15:12, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Gren, I have put Mary Jane Patterson in for GA nomination. Do I need to add her name to any editathon list or anything or do I just now wait and see what befalls her? Balance person (talk) 09:33, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Balance person: Hey! That's great to hear. Yes, feel free to add it to the nominations list and I'll get it put on the timeline. Hopefully someone will take a look at it soon. (One thing I'll mention is that there are a few reference errors that you should sort out, like the bare url reference for Chalkboard Champions) --Grnrchst (talk) 10:10, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reminder re the reference errors! I think I have caught them now. Have added MJP to the nominations list. Balance person (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again, Gren. It's been a while since I put Mary Jane Patterson on the GA nominations list. I am just wondering if this is a kind of normal length of waiting time? Is it acceptable to ask someone to look at the article or shall I just get on with something else for a while? Just wondering! Balance person (talk) 20:40, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Balance person: This is normal. In fact, it's unfortunately quite common for GA nominations to go months without a review. On the Women in Green project talk page you'll see that there's a backlog of unreviewed nominations dating back almost a year. This can only be fixed by more people reviewing articles. You could ask someone to review, I don't think there's any rules against it, but I can't guarantee that they will. So I'd suggest getting around to other things while you wait. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Gren. Will do! Balance person (talk) 09:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gren. Good news. Mary Jane Patterson has been passed as a good article. The review process was interesting and I learned a lot so thanks for being the catalyst! Balance person (talk) 17:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Balance person: That's wonderful to hear! Congratulations and excellent work on that article :D --Grnrchst (talk) 18:08, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Gren's weekly(ish) update (24 May 2024)

[edit]

It's not been a good couple weeks for me, so I have very little to report. A couple weeks ago I and a couple other editors worked on a new article about the Constitution Protection Region of Southern Fujian, which was a fascinating statelet of the Warlord Era during the Third Chinese Revolution. More recently I ended up rewriting the article about the Frisian freedom in order to clean up some major problems I had introduced to the article back when I was still new to writing Wikipedia articles. It still has a lot of room for improvement, but I'm at least confident that it's not a problem article anymore.

On the personal side, this past fortnight has been very taxing for me. On top of sorting out moving flats, which has been very stress-inducing, my work computer took some physical damage that has put it completely out of commission and in need of repairs. All of my research documents, drafts and other work related stuff are now sitting in a repair shop and I don't know when it'll be ready to go again... I managed to temporarily fill in with a substitute computer, but that one also had issues that I needed to get repaired today. Needless to say, this has been an exhausting and expensive couple weeks for me, and I hope this comes to an end soon so I can get back to Wiki writing. At the very least I hope my work computer will be fixed in time for the Women in Green event starting next Saturday.

We all have difficult spots I suppose, but may your weekend be full of relief and joy, dear reader. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:21, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I now realise there are other articles I did some work on last week (Maria Orsetti, Samuel H. Gordon, Anarchist-Communist Federation of Occitania, Anti-statism, Hanka Grothendieck, Nathan Navro, Life and Labor Commune and more on de Cleyre), but I'm honestly too drained to even think about what to say about them. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Evgeniia Subbotina

[edit]

On 29 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evgeniia Subbotina, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Evgeniia Subbotina failed to escape her own exile in Siberia, she successfully aided the escapes of Catherine Breshkovsky, Yelizaveta Kovalskaya and Sofya Bogomolets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evgeniia Subbotina. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Evgeniia Subbotina), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's rapid-fire weekly update (31 May 2024)

[edit]

Got laptop back, took way too long and cost way too much to fix. Did a bunch of stuff on Voltairine de Cleyre before the core contest ended, still got more to do there as it's not 100% yet, but I'm happy on the progress made so far. Wrote article about Sophie Kropotkin, partner was surprised that one didn't exist but a lot of male historians almost exclusively refer to her as "Kropotkin's wife/widow" and downplay her own accomplishments. Still stressed and financially strained from the move. Gotta prepare for coordinating a month-long edit-a-thon now. Good night. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of downplayed women in Kropotkin's sphere, there's Olga Levashova. To hear Kropotkin tell it, she was more important than anyone else in the Geneva exile scene. To hear the historians... crickets. It didn't help my search that Левашова has virtually the same birth and death years, but Kropotkin's own bare "Madame Olga" wasn't a great help either. -- asilvering (talk) 18:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering: Oof that's frustrating. Caroline Cahm's Kropotkin: And the Rise of Revolutionary Anarchism, 1872-1886 points to her being mentioned in Jan Marinus Meijer's Knowledge and Revolution pp. 79, 101, but that's all I could find in English that you haven't already got down :/ I just tried looking to see if there was anything on her in Деятели революционного движения в России but couldn't find anything. Would have to look more into Russian sources to see if there's anything else. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:24, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's so aggravating that even the men who did acknowledge the importance of women in these movements didn't write much of anything about them! Thanks for the tip. -- asilvering (talk) 04:30, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Core Contest has ended!

[edit]

The Core Contest has now ended! Thank you for your interest and efforts. Make sure that you include both a "start" and "improvement diff" on the entries page. The judges will begin delibertaing shortly and annouce the winners within the next few weeks. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 00:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Your GA nomination of María Pacheco

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article María Pacheco you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer777 -- Sawyer777 (talk) 19:05, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green GA Editathon June 2024 - Going Back in Time

[edit]

I've added something here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green/20-Minute Article Assessments. --evrik (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of María Pacheco

[edit]

The article María Pacheco you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:María Pacheco for comments about the article, and Talk:María Pacheco/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sawyer777 -- Sawyer777 (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (7 June 2024)

[edit]

First week of the Women in Green edit-a-thon is going along swimmingly! I started off by researching María Pacheco, a figure of the comuneros revolt that I knew about only on the surface level. It was very interesting to see where she came from, how her family clashed with the monarchy and even opposed the Inquisition, and the background that shaped her resistance to Rey Carlos. Thanks to Sawyer777 for reviewing that article, I very much enjoyed this wee research dive.

For Women in Red, as it's the X-Z month, I took a look at some women whose names start with those letters. Alongside the Spanish libertarian youth leader Julia Romera Yáñez and the Swedish solidarity activist Eva X Moberg, I spent a lot of time focusing on Mochizuki Yuriko and Wong Sau Ying. Researching first-wave feminists is always fascinating, as you get to see just how much times have changed in the past century. I was astounded to find out how controversial the bob cut was back in their day, especially in Wong's case, as it even caused a panic among the British colonial authorities! I ended up going through (as far as I know) all the English language sources about Wong, so I ended up nominating her article for Women in Green too. I'd like to know more about Mochizuki, especially her time in Manchuria, but I would need to get access to a certain source for that to happen.

I was also caught by the news of the 2024 Nigerian general strike, so just had to make an article about it when I heard about their demands and that they managed to shut down airports and the national grid. Negotiations with the government are ongoing, so we'll see if it escalates or receives an amicable result some time next week. Finally I've capped things off by researching Cécile Fatiman, the Vodou priestess that incited the Haitian Revolution. I only ever heard about her as a footnote in the wider story, so it was good to read more about her, even if some information about her was frustratingly contradictory and lacking. I hope to do more work on that article next week and see about nominating it for GA. All the best to you this weekend dear reader. --Grnrchst (talk) 15:23, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wong Sau Ying

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wong Sau Ying you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 01:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cécile Fatiman

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cécile Fatiman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dragons

[edit]
"The Rare Case of a Dragon in Medieval Spanish Literature". Medieval Perspectives. 26: 7. 2011. ISSN 1057-5367.

Any ideas on how I can access this? --evrik (talk) 06:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Evrik: Might be worth asking at the resource request noticeboard. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never knew that resource existed. Thanks! --evrik (talk) 13:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (14 June 2024)

[edit]

I've had a relatively relaxed week this week, in part because I got so much done last week that I was left a bit confused as to what to do next. Mostly I've been responding to reviews of my own good article nominations and reviewing other nominations for the Women in Green event, which is coming along quite nicely. For Women in Red, I wrote an article about Evgeniia Zavadskaia, another of the narodnik women that was tried in the Trial of the 193. It's left me wondering how many more of the 193 are left to write about, I could probably put together a red list for it. I also took to expanding the article on the SAC Syndikalisterna from stub. For a few months, I've wanted to learn more about their participation in the Swedish welfare system, so it was interesting to write more a bit about that.

I've capped the week off by preparing some of next week's coming GA nominations for the WiG event. I wrote a bit about Quilago, as I was attracted to this story of a queen regnant resisting an expanding empire. I wasn't expecting to read about how big a role she has had in Ecuadorian national mythology and the controversy surrounding that! I will have to dig further into Spanish language sources, as there wasn't too much in the English sources, but I'm enjoying the process so far. I also expanded the article on Sophie Kropotkin some more, after I remembered that Woodcock's book wrote some about her. It definitely resulted in some good additional information to fill out the article, and I'll need to check some other biographies before nominating. I'm sure there's more to learn about the botanical princess!

To whoever's reading this, I hope you have a fine weekend. Next week will be the last one of spring here in the northern hemisphere, I can already feel that sumer is icumen in. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's a list of all 193 and their lawyers at ru:Процесс ста девяноста трёх, if you want somewhere to start from. I assume there isn't much to say about most of the defendants, but there's probably at least enough for an interesting list article you could use as a jumping-point for the more fully documented members. -- asilvering (talk) 18:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering: Thanks for sharing this with me! It seems as though 49 of the defendants were notable enough to at least have a ru-wiki article, 14 of whom were women, so that's a good place to start. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:06, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wong Sau Ying

[edit]

The article Wong Sau Ying you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wong Sau Ying and Talk:Wong Sau Ying/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 14:02, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Reviewer Barnstar
For your GA review of Dorothy Dworkin which was timely, thorough, and led to considerable improvements of the article for the Going Back in Time WIG edit-a-thon. Much thanks! – Reidgreg (talk) 22:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (21 June 2024)

[edit]

This has been a difficult week for me, as I find myself on the edge of burnout with wiki work and as life is weighing heavily on me again. I haven't gotten as much done as I would have liked to this week; I had a splitting headache on Monday and was sleep-deprived on Tuesday. Still, I managed to take on a couple articles for review: @Reidgreg's article on Dorothy Dworkin and @Thebiguglyalien's article on Kahina Bahloul were fascinating reads, I very much enjoyed learning about these two amazing women and their effect on their communities. The highest of compliments to these two editors, who I think are clearly talented researchers and writers.

On my own end, I've tried to do further improvements to the articles on Wong Sau Ying and Cécile Fatiman, per the comments on their respective reviews. I've also done more work on Quilago with some Spanish sources I found, which provided even more information about her life and legacy. For Juneteenth I also gave a go at expanding the article on black anarchism, which had previously been rather short and lacking in detail. Thankfully the sources I worked from provided a very interesting look at the tendency's development, and how it distinguished itself from both the authoritarian tendencies within the black power movement and the racist tendencies of the white American anarchist movement. I hope to look more into this in the future in order to further improve our collective understanding of the movement.

Next week is the last week of the Women in Green edit-a-thon, so I hope I can recover somewhat over the weekend and can see it through to its conclusion. I'm very proud of what we've managed to accomplish so far, with about one new nomination each day. Events like these, where I can work closely together with others, have been among my best experiences on this platform. I'm so happy to have been a part of this. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:01, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quilago

[edit]

Excellent work! Feel free to put up your articles on Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge or any of the relevant regional challenges! Keep up the good work!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:09, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GAN María Pacheco

[edit]

I have reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/María Pacheco and proposed an alternative hook based on the first hook you listed. I'd like to ask you if there are any issues with the ALT4 hook suggestion before I pass it. – Editør (talk) 10:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Wong Sau Ying

[edit]

The article Wong Sau Ying you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wong Sau Ying for comments about the article, and Talk:Wong Sau Ying/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 13:25, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Quilago

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Quilago you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 23:04, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gren's weekly update (28 June 2024) "I'm tired, boss"

[edit]

This week, I found myself completely burnt out. With the exception of working on opened GAN reviews and a few small edits here and there, I haven't been able to do much else. I'm lacking in the energy, motivation and inspiration needed to do a lot of this work, and the stresses of my life are piling up as well. On top of that, I've become increasingly demoralised by seeing how our work is viewed, discussed and used off-wiki, whether it's constant complaints about perceived wrongs with articles or the project as a whole, or Content Creators profiting off our labour without so much as mentioning the platform. The scale of what we're aiming to accomplish here sometimes frightens me as well, given how under-staffed many of our projects often feel. Although I've never been more proud of the work I'm contributing to here, it's getting more and more difficult to see the positive benefits of what I'm doing when compared with how much time and labour I'm expending on it. I'm just so tired.

Over the past few months of research, I've come across three historical figures (Peter Kropotkin, Voltairine de Cleyre and Fernand Pelloutier) whose health was damaged by overwork, even contributing directly to at least one of their deaths. So, I think my books might be trying to tell me that I need a break. I'm happy to see through the remaining GANs that I have nominated and close out the WiG event in a few days, but I don't know how much more I can do than that. Larger projects and efforts that I'm in the middle of will need to wait. I need some time off. All the best to anyone reading this. Take care. --Grnrchst (talk) 11:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Take care, Grnrchst! We all need to look after ourselves, and you've done so much great work this year. Sometimes it's best to get away from the internet for a while. Alanna the Brave (talk) 11:59, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Take care, and rest well. Wikipedia will still be here when you get back, and the subjects you write on will be just as dead two weeks, two months, or two years from now. As for the complainers, well. Tell them to step up or shut up. -- asilvering (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
story · music · places
Gren, thank you so much for the WiG message you sent me! I had no idea how you felt. You are your boss, and you deserve a break. Perhaps read a bit more than feeling that you have to edit. I turned to writing my little stories, such as today's connecting to a 9-year-old DYK, but at the same time to the birthday of a friend whose birthday is today and who heard the piece with me singing in choir. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pictured on the Main page: Brian's Mozart family grand tour, my story today, and Mozart related to all three items of music on my talk: our 2023 concert, an opera in a theatre where a Mozart premiere took place, and those remembered, Martti Wallén, a bass, and Liana Isakadze, a violinist from Georgia, (whose article would be better with more details about her music-making). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My story today is - because of the anniversary of the premiere OTD in 1782 - about Die Entführung aus dem Serail, opera by Mozart, while yesterday's was - because of the TFA - about Les contes d'Hoffmann, opera by Offenbach, - so 3 times Mozart if you click on "music" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Today's story is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11, yesterday's was a great mezzo, and on Thursday we watched a sublime ballerina. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

[edit]

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of Quilago

[edit]

The article Quilago you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Quilago and Talk:Quilago/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for María Pacheco

[edit]

On 8 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article María Pacheco, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 16th-century chroniclers thought María Pacheco, a leader of the Revolt of the Comuneros, was a witch? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/María Pacheco. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, María Pacheco), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:02, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Quilago

[edit]

The article Quilago you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Quilago for comments about the article, and Talk:Quilago/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Firefangledfeathers -- Firefangledfeathers (talk) 12:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

DYK for Wong Sau Ying

[edit]

On 31 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Wong Sau Ying, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Wong Sau Ying attempted to assassinate a British colonial official, the police and press began to associate the bob cut with anarchism? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wong Sau Ying. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Wong Sau Ying), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sophie Kropotkin

[edit]

The article Sophie Kropotkin you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sophie Kropotkin and Talk:Sophie Kropotkin/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 20:41, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Romani anarchists has been nominated for splitting

[edit]

Category:Romani anarchists has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mariano R. Vázquez

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mariano R. Vázquez you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Sophie Kropotkin

[edit]

The article Sophie Kropotkin you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sophie Kropotkin for comments about the article, and Talk:Sophie Kropotkin/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham -- Simongraham (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions on Rai Dynasty

[edit]

I think the article's prose is very confusing and uses a lot of words to say very little. There are also some clear problems with neutrality and broadness, so that's criteria 1, 3 and 4 this is failing to live up to.

Thanks for your opinions which I value — why do you feel that the article does neither address the main aspects of the topic nor represent viewpoints fairly without editorial bias? Thanks, TrangaBellam (talk) 09:09, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mariano R. Vázquez

[edit]

The article Mariano R. Vázquez you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mariano R. Vázquez for comments about the article, and Talk:Mariano R. Vázquez/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 09:45, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week

[edit]
Editor of the Week
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of your great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Thebiguglyalien submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate Grnrchst to be Editor of the Week for consistently high-quality contributions in both writing and reviewing. Not only has Grnrchst done extensive work to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Eastern Europe, but they work tirelessly to help close Wikipedia's gender gap by writing about women's history. Their participation at Women in Green has stimulated and helped other editors to make similar contributions. His "weekly updates" are unique and worth a read!

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week: 

{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
Women in Green
Grnrchst
 
Editor of the Week
for the week beginning August 11, 2024
Grnrchst is known for consistently high-quality contributions in both writing and reviewing. Extensive work to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Eastern Europe and tireless work to help close Wikipedia's gender gap by writing about women's history. Participates at Women in Green and has stimulated other editors to make similar contributions.
Recognized for
"weekly updates" are unique and worth a read!
Notable work
Eastern Europe
Submit a nomination

Thanks again for your efforts! Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 15:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Thank you so much, I'm honoured <3 --Grnrchst (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Extremely well-deserved! -- asilvering (talk) 19:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024 at Women in Red

[edit]
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Your GA nomination of Cécile Fatiman

[edit]

The article Cécile Fatiman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cécile Fatiman for comments about the article, and Talk:Cécile Fatiman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Caeciliusinhorto -- Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sophie Kropotkin

[edit]

On 30 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sophie Kropotkin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sophie Kropotkin and her husband returned to France despite the risk of being arrested, as they thought that detention in a French prison would be preferable to living in England? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sophie Kropotkin. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sophie Kropotkin), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 19,786 views (824.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Irakleia

[edit]

I see you watched the recent video by Zoe Baker. Thank you for your contribution. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 20:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ana Sigüenza

[edit]

On 8 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ana Sigüenza, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ana Sigüenza. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ana Sigüenza), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitations sent!

[edit]

Hey Gren! Just letting you know that I've sent out the October event invites to the Women in Green mailing list. I had assumed you were on the list already, but it appears not -- do you want to be added for future? (If nothing else, being on the list can help you confirm that a mail-out has been successful.) Alanna the Brave (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alanna the Brave: Perfect, thanks very much! I hadn't realised I wasn't on the list! If you could add me that'd be great, thanks. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alrighty -- added! I'll request a watchlist notice about a week from now. I think you've finished the rest of the event prep already (we're on a roll). Alanna the Brave (talk) 00:34, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Voltairine de Cleyre

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Voltairine de Cleyre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 15:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An island for you!

[edit]
Island list-building award
Thanks for making so many new lists for Women + Islands! Lajmmoore (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mary Jane Patterson

[edit]

Hello again Gren! Hope you are well. Mary Jane Patterson gained good article status as you know and did finally appear as a 'Did you know?' item in September. It took ages. But as a result got 7,900 page views if I am reading the chart correctly. I am very new to DYK and now wonder if I should add this to a DYK statistics page somewhere IF the number of page views merits it. And also IF it helps at all. What do you think about that? Balance person (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Balance person: The article has already been added to the list monthly DYK pageview leaders, so no need to add anything yourself. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:23, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh great! Thanks! Balance person (talk) 09:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article for you to look at

[edit]

Hi Gren, I hope you're doing well. I really admire the level of quality you bring to articles. So I thought I'd shoot some articles your way that could use some love. No pressure to edit just a suggestion.

AnarchistHistory (talk) 04:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AnarchistHistory: Thanks for bringing these to my attention. They could definitely do with some work, but it's not work that I'll be doing for the forseeable future. Over the next few months, I'll have my hands full with a series of projects that I've been working on and planning for a while, from hosting the Women in Green edit-a-thon to preparing more articles for GA and a couple for FAC.
Have you considered taking a crack at improving these yourself? If it's a subject that interests you, it could be a rewarding experience to research and write about. --Grnrchst (talk) 08:48, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging in @Shushugah, who's been doing some work on articles on unions. Interested in a collab with a wiki-newbie? -- asilvering (talk) 17:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You had me at unions and violence, two of my favorite topics! An immediate thought I had though is, these articles would be better served merged. I don't care what the title would be, but something like Unions and violence would get that clear enough. We can figure where Union violence in the United States fits within that. That said, it would give a more balanced and polished summary of the related topics instead of promoting POV splits. Would also need to see where this relates or differs from union busting. I would also prefer authoritative summaries, without being a Coatrack ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 17:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WIG and GA backlog

[edit]

Hi. Thanks for the invite to the WIG October effort. Perhaps this is a minor concern, but the current GA backlog might discourage me and others. For a previous GA effort, I nominated Jex Blackmore. (They are a great subject and you might love doing the GA review!) That was in June and the backlog long before that. So I wonder if WIG might, at the same time, promote the Wikipedia:Good articles/GAN Backlog Drives/October 2024. There's no QPQ for GA, I gather, but maybe there should be. Anyway, keep up the great work! ProfGray (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ProfGray: Sorry that no review has materialised yet, I understand the frustration. We are coordinating with the GAN backlog drive to encourage participation in both and we already collect lists of relevant nominations in the backlog on the main WiG talk page. We certainly intend for reviews to be a big part of this event. --Grnrchst (talk) 14:56, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Great. No need to apologize. Hope you're enjoying your work! ProfGray (talk) 15:08, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mariano R. Vázquez

[edit]

On 28 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mariano R. Vázquez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mariano R. Vázquez oversaw the integration of anarchists into the government during the Spanish Civil War? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mariano R. Vázquez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mariano R. Vázquez), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:03, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Division of WiG tasks

[edit]

Hi Grnrchst -- October at last! Just checking in on division of WiG tasks: I'm going to start tackling some 20-minute assessments today. Would you like to manage the talk page chat while I keep the world map updated this month? If you can handle the barnstars after the event, that would be brilliant. Alanna the Brave (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alanna the Brave: Aye that sounds perfect. Best of luck over the coming weeks! --Grnrchst (talk) 12:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Forgive me for butting in, but where are the 20min assessments located? I'd be happy to do some of these but I don't see them anywhere. Possibly just banner-blindness on my part, but I thought I had the relevant page watchlisted. -- asilvering (talk) 17:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asilvering: No worries, they're at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green/20-Minute Article Assessments. --Grnrchst (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I see, it's only being linked on the backlog drives themselves and not anywhere in the main WiG pages. I thought this was a thing that WiG did whether an ediathon was on or not - am I misremembering? If it's not restricted to edit drives only, should there be some mention on the main WiG page? -- asilvering (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shadia Abu Ghazaleh

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shadia Abu Ghazaleh you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maddy from Celeste -- Maddy from Celeste (talk) 22:25, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cécile Fatiman

[edit]

On 17 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cécile Fatiman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Haitian Revolution began when Cécile Fatiman sacrificed a black pig, a ritual that was later repeated by Haitians resisting the United States occupation and the Duvalier dynasty? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cécile Fatiman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cécile Fatiman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Shadia Abu Ghazaleh

[edit]

The article Shadia Abu Ghazaleh you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shadia Abu Ghazaleh for comments about the article, and Talk:Shadia Abu Ghazaleh/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maddy from Celeste -- Maddy from Celeste (talk) 16:43, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for thanking my edit

[edit]

This is my first time I got thanked. So, thank you too :) Daddynnoob (talk) 07:17, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Voltairine de Cleyre

[edit]

The article Voltairine de Cleyre you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Voltairine de Cleyre for comments about the article, and Talk:Voltairine de Cleyre/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Edwininlondon -- Edwininlondon (talk) 10:04, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2024

[edit]
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

[edit]

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, Delaware BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Canada Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and Christmas Island AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the October 2024 GAN backlog drive

[edit]
The Minor Barnstar
Your noteworthy contribution (4 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open letter to WMF in connection with Asian News International

[edit]

Thank you for informing me that an open letter to WMF has been published. Anything you and QuicoleJR can do to draw attention to this more widely would be greatly appreciated.--Ipigott (talk) 16:26, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anarchism without adjectives

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anarchism without adjectives you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Blue Rider -- The Blue Rider (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spookyaki -- Spookyaki (talk) 20:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning

[edit]

The article Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning and Talk:Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spookyaki -- Spookyaki (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

[edit]

Because of an edit conflict, I removed your addendum from the RFC page. My apologies! I've reinstated it. Hope the layout is correct. Again, very sorry! Mushy Yank (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mushy Yank: No bother, it's no surprise that there'd be edit conflicts in a thread with this much participation. Thank you for reinstating it! --Grnrchst (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning

[edit]

The article Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning for comments about the article, and Talk:Fagoppositionens Sammenslutning/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Spookyaki -- Spookyaki (talk) 15:41, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anarchism without adjectives

[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anarchism without adjectives you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Anarchism without adjectives

[edit]

The article Anarchism without adjectives you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Anarchism without adjectives for comments about the article, and Talk:Anarchism without adjectives/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Generalissima -- Generalissima (talk) 16:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Grnrchst&oldid=1258291519"