User talk:Another Believer/Archive 33
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | → | Archive 40 |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020). 
|
Your GA nomination of Pied Cow Coffeehouse
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pied Cow Coffeehouse you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 07:21, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Mapframe maps available in Infobox restaurant
You can now add automatic mapframe maps in Infobox restaurant by adding |mapframe=yes to the infobox.
I also found an easy way to get coordinates that might work for you. Pull up Google Maps and go to the location in question, then right-click on the map where you want the pin to be, and click on the coordinates that show up in the resulting menu. That will copy the coords to the clipboard. You can then paste them into the infobox; wrap them in the coord template and make sure to put a vertical bar (pipe) between the latitude and longitude. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:33, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Jonesey95, Thanks!, I will give this a try soon. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- This Google Maps method is the one I default to, as I've found it the easiest. But FWIW, I was taught by another user at Special:Diff/964172047 that the Google coordinates are actually overprecise to the point of being slightly wrong. They described a more complicated but more accurate method of determining location coordinates here. Though I still mostly use Google for ease, I now round to the fourth place after the decimal to reduce the overprecision error. Armadillopteryx 04:05, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I do that too, but while AB has created 1,000 times as much WP content as I have, AB has had a little trouble with techie stuff in the past, so I wanted to try to keep the instruction as concise and undaunting as possible. BTW, AB, if you can't get it to work, just add
|mapframe=yesand then ping me as usual to add the coords. I've got nowhere to be. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:48, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I do that too, but while AB has created 1,000 times as much WP content as I have, AB has had a little trouble with techie stuff in the past, so I wanted to try to keep the instruction as concise and undaunting as possible. BTW, AB, if you can't get it to work, just add
- @Jonesey95 and Armadillopteryx: How does this look?
- I get slightly different coords with the Google method (45.5243, -122.6820). Comparing my coords to yours, they hit the same street corner, but they are across the street from each other. Google tells me that the coffee shop is on the south side of NW Davis Street, which matches my coords (yours are on the north side of the street). But you presumably know this location in person: if you zoom in on the mapframe in the infobox, does the marker hit the correct spot? Armadillopteryx 02:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, You're correct. The marker is on the wrong side of the street. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, how did you get your coords? I searched "136 Northwest 9th Avenue portland or", copied the coords from the URL in the address bar, and then rounded to the fourth place after the decimal. Armadillopteryx 03:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, I searched "Fuller's Coffee Shop" at Google Map, right clicked on the marker, copied the coordinates to clipboard, then insert in the infobox. After rounding the fourth place, I surrounded the numbers with "coord" and the pipes. This did not work, so I copied the "type:landmark_region:US-OR|format=dms|display=inline,title" from Angkor I to see if that would work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Got it. I'm not sure if you need all of those parameters or not. Ever since someone who knows a lot about coordinates added them to one of my venue articles, I've been copy–pasting this format into all the others, and it has always worked so far:
{{Coord|40.7254|-73.9834|type:landmark|display=inline,title}}Armadillopteryx 04:07, 6 December 2020 (UTC)- Armadillopteryx, Ok, thanks, I've made this adjustment and also updated the coordinates by searching in Google Maps using the address instead of the business name. I will try to add these maps to other restaurant articles I've worked on. Thanks, both! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Got it. I'm not sure if you need all of those parameters or not. Ever since someone who knows a lot about coordinates added them to one of my venue articles, I've been copy–pasting this format into all the others, and it has always worked so far:
- Armadillopteryx, I searched "Fuller's Coffee Shop" at Google Map, right clicked on the marker, copied the coordinates to clipboard, then insert in the infobox. After rounding the fourth place, I surrounded the numbers with "coord" and the pipes. This did not work, so I copied the "type:landmark_region:US-OR|format=dms|display=inline,title" from Angkor I to see if that would work. ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Out of curiosity, how did you get your coords? I searched "136 Northwest 9th Avenue portland or", copied the coords from the URL in the address bar, and then rounded to the fourth place after the decimal. Armadillopteryx 03:55, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, You're correct. The marker is on the wrong side of the street. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- I get slightly different coords with the Google method (45.5243, -122.6820). Comparing my coords to yours, they hit the same street corner, but they are across the street from each other. Google tells me that the coffee shop is on the south side of NW Davis Street, which matches my coords (yours are on the north side of the street). But you presumably know this location in person: if you zoom in on the mapframe in the infobox, does the marker hit the correct spot? Armadillopteryx 02:52, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Jonesey95 and Armadillopteryx: How does this look?
Your GA nomination of Pied Cow Coffeehouse
The article Pied Cow Coffeehouse you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Pied Cow Coffeehouse for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 04:41, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brix Tavern
The article Brix Tavern you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brix Tavern for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Original Dinerant
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Original Dinerant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 12:41, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Newspapers.com
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I suspect that you have a subscription to this. Is it working correctly now for you? = my subscription is not, but it has been up until a couple of days ago. I emailed Wiki-library about this, however have not heard back from anyone yet. Thanks for any input you can provide.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
I just did a major upgrade to this article, that recently failed a Good Article review. Could you look it over to see if you think it now meets Good Article standards. You can copy edit accordingly, OR give me pointers to improve upon. If you happen to get involved in the article and like it perhaps you might be interested in becoming the new GA nominator. I'll be glad to answer most of the issues that come up with the new review, especially those related to referencing and sources. Each of us would get a GA credit then, you as the nominator and me as the creator of the article. Does that sound like something you might be interested in? --Doug Coldwell (talk) 20:54, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of The Original Dinerant
The article The Original Dinerant you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Original Dinerant for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 03:41, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020 Guild of Copy Editors Newsletter
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 8 December 2020 (UTC) |
Your GA nomination of Fuller's Coffee Shop
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fuller's Coffee Shop you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Danielyng -- Danielyng (talk) 20:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 11:21, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Southeast Grind
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Southeast Grind you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 11:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone copyedit
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Good luck with GA and all the best, Miniapolis 18:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC) |
- @Miniapolis: Thank you! I know this was a long one to copy edit. Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
- Interesting topic, and it's come a very long way from a prod and an AfD. Stay well and all the best, Miniapolis 20:35, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Why have you re-added this article to the United States WikiProject? It should not be added by default just because West is from the country and if it was expanded during the US challenge, this should be somewhere on the talk page. --K. Peake 12:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hobo's you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 17:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge
The article Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 17:41, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The article Hobo's you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hobo's for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Papi Chulo's
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Papi Chulo's you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Southeast Grind
The article Southeast Grind you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Southeast Grind for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 09:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
The article Hobo's you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hobo's for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 09:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Papi Chulo's
The article Papi Chulo's you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Papi Chulo's for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 09:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
I opened a review of this article over an hour ago, the bot is just being crap right now... --K. Peake 18:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake, OK, thanks for the heads up! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christmas Queens 2
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christmas Queens 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
- The bot fixed its sluggishness this morning thankfully (I live in the UK), though I would've posted a message on the GANs talk page if it had been still broken when I woke up this morning. --K. Peake 07:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christmas Queens 2
The article Christmas Queens 2 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Christmas Queens 2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Christmas Queens 2
The article Christmas Queens 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Christmas Queens 2 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Divina de Campo - Red and Silver.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 19 December 2020 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Yia Yia Mary's for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yia Yia Mary's until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
Another Believer, I'll go ahead and review it after Christmas since I'll be spending more time with my fam + after the AfD has been closed— unfortunately I think a GAN tagged for AfD will look disgusting so waiting would appropriate. As Armadillo said on the AfD, there's plenty of sources you may be interested in expanding the article. Cheers, GeraldWL 21:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yia Yia Mary's
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yia Yia Mary's you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reywas92 -- Reywas92 (talk) 20:21, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! |
|
Hello Another Believer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
- Starzoner, Thank you! Happy holidays! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:45, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas Another Believer!
.jpg)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
Jerm (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Thank you, and same to you as well! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:31, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
 Walter Elmer Schofield, Across the River (1904), Carnegie Museum of Art. |
Best wishes for a safe, healthy and prosperous 2021. | |
| Thank you for your contributions toward making Wikipedia a better and more accurate place. BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Oneupsmanship: This painting turned the friendly rivalry between Edward Redfield and Elmer Schofield into a feud. Schofield was a frequent houseguest at Redfield's farm, upstream from New Hope, Pennsylvania, and the two would go out painting together, competing to capture the better view. Redfield served on the jury for the 1904 Annual Exhibition of the Carnegie Institute; at which, despite Redfield's opposition, Across the River was awarded the Gold Medal and $1,500 prize. It was not until a 1963 interview that the 93-year-old Redfield revealed the painting as the cause of the 40-year feud between them. Schofield may have painted it in England, but a blindsided Redfield knew that it was a view of the Delaware River, from his own front yard! |
- Thank you! Happy New Year, ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
Just for future reference
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that normally, the Current Event WikiProject is placed above other WikiProjects in the listed, due to the fact that it is removed about a week later. Since we don't interact with many articles (Non-COVID articles isn't more than like 10), the WikiProject has a higher priority on the article. Once the topic is no longer deemed a current event (Once it is fully out of the Portal's 7 day window) then the WikiProject banner is removed. Also thank you for all the hard edits you have done on 2020 Nashville bombing. Elijahandskip (talk) 23:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Elijahandskip, Thanks for the note. I often sort WikiProject banners alphabetically but will try to keep this in mind. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:07, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 53, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 28 December 2020
- Arbitration report: 2020 election results
- Featured content: Very nearly ringing in the New Year with "Blank Space" – but we got there in time.
- Traffic report: 2020 wraps up
- Recent research: Predicting the next move in Wikipedia discussions
- Essay: Subjective importance
- Gallery: Angels in the architecture
- Humour: 'Twas the Night Before Wikimas
"The Panama Papers (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Panama Papers (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 28#The Panama Papers (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BOVINEBOY2008 21:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Ox (Portland, Oregon) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ox (Portland, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
A New Year With Women in Red!
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
"The Incredible Story of Rose Island" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Incredible Story of Rose Island. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 30#The Incredible Story of Rose Island until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BOVINEBOY2008 12:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Boxer Ramen
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Boxer Ramen has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I have a couple of suggestions. Since Wikipedia is not a travel guide, I would remove the operating hours. They cannot easily be updated and kept current. This would also take care of all the "as of 2016"s in the article, which immediately indicates it is out of date. I'm unsure of the usefulness of reviews from 2014 (or even 2016, for that matter); menus change, staff changes etc... You might want to think about that. Congratulations on securing the GA designation.
Happy Holidays! Stay safe.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:03, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
|
Happy New Year! |
Hello Another Believer: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message
I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Starzoner, Thanks, and same to you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year 2021!
Abishe (talk) — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
- Thanks, and Happy New Year! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:56, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Yia Yia Mary's
The article Yia Yia Mary's you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yia Yia Mary's for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 18:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Another Believer—thank you for adding an "image needed" tag to Play-Doh (sculpture). I agree it is needed. I've added such an image. Just thought I'd let you know. Make any adjustments you feel are called for. Thank you. Bus stop (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bus stop, Thanks! I see there's a flag on File:Play-doh.jpg, so be sure to address or else the file may be deleted. - --Another Believer (Talk) 04:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- I did. I added "Licensing" information. Bus stop (talk) 05:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your additional work to the article and Season's Greetings! Bus stop (talk) 06:57, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! North America1000 06:13, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
_(14573454469).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(14752756965).jpg)
- – Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.
Your GA nomination of Cricket Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cricket Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:02, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:03, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon)
The article My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:My Father's Place (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 18:21, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:34, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
Hey!
Hey buddy! I thought you were the reviewer (re. my talk page), my brain hurts LOL. How have you been? Giacobbe talk 00:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- (CA)Giacobbe, Hey! Nope!, I don't review Good article nominees even though I'm a frequent Good article nominator. I just enjoy creating content more than reviewing content. I was following along on Jesus Christ 2005 God Bless America, which is on my watchlist because I created the redirect back in 2017. Same reason I saw Frail State of Mind was recently promoted as well. FWIW, I'm crediting you here which is for tracking the status on pages I've created. I hope you have more GAs on your radar and keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks dude! I'm focusing on expanding out the NOAF songs right now during my winter break. Next up is "Me & You Together Song" which I need to edit before submitting. Giacobbe talk 00:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Fuller's Coffee Shop
The article Fuller's Coffee Shop you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fuller's Coffee Shop for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Danielyng -- Danielyng (talk) 07:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Decoded (EP)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Decoded (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Decoded (EP)
The article Decoded (EP) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Decoded (EP) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Decoded (EP)
The article Decoded (EP) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Decoded (EP) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Seven years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reminder! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
United States 50,000 Challenge
I had discovered the challenge mostly from you posting about it on talk pages of articles that you created, so I thought it would be of your interest to know that I have now improved my first article for the challenge! --K. Peake 13:36, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- Kyle Peake, Great! Thanks for contributing. Will be years before the challenge is complete, at least at this rate. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Jake Angeli for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Angeli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Nomination of Richard "Bigo" Barnett for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard "Bigo" Barnett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Nomination of Adam C. Johnson for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam C. Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Speedy deletion nomination of Adam C. Johnson
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
A tag has been placed on Adam C. Johnson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Bushranger One ping only 00:03, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Lonnie Coffman for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lonnie Coffman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Nomination for deletion of Template:2021 US Capitol Storming
Template:2021 US Capitol Storming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mgasparin (talk) 07:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Membership renewal of Wiki Project Med Foundation
You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.
| ReJoin Wiki Project Med Foundation |
|---|
Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01
DYK for Industry Bar
On 10 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Industry Bar, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Industry faces Therapy? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Industry Bar. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Industry Bar), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Richard "Bigo" Barnett for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard "Bigo" Barnett (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
Belmont Inn
Hi there, I wasn't aware of your experience at article creation (facepalm moment). I'd be more than pleased to withdraw the Afd. You're certainly an editor who knows what they're doing. Bingobro (Chat) 04:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bingobro, If you don't mind, I'd love more time to expand the article a bit. I'm expanding the entry now based on the Oregonian archives via Multnomah County Library. ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:00, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've withdrawn the Afd. Take your time on the article and thanks for your contributions. Cheers! Bingobro (Chat) 05:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bingobro, Thanks! Happy editing, ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- I've withdrawn the Afd. Take your time on the article and thanks for your contributions. Cheers! Bingobro (Chat) 05:09, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cricket Cafe
The article Cricket Cafe you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cricket Cafe for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of The Liquor Store for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Liquor Store until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Are we really still debating this? ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC) |
Nomination of Pastini Pastaria for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pastini Pastaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
Be careful with WikiProject banner shell
Be careful with {{WPBS}}. When used with some project templates with some combinations of parameters, using {{WikiProject banner shell}} pushes the page over the "expansion depth" limit of 40. See Template:WikiProject banner shell#Limitations and bugs for details.
I have undone one of your two recent edits to Talk:116th Street–Columbia University station. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Davidwr, I use 'Rater' and also manually add "WPBS" templates all the time. How am I supposed to know when to avoid using? ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Just check after you do it to see if the expansion depth is exceeded. You can two it two ways: 1) view the source and search for "expansion depth", or 2) edit again and look at the parser profiling data. The expansion depth is listed there. If the Rater tool automatically adds {{WPBS}} perhaps the tool's maintainer can add tools to automatically check for this. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:08, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
About Draft:A GREAT PERSON, EXALTED IN SPIRIT - hmmm
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi Another Believer, I have done a little research about this draft This would appear to me to have all the hallmarks of a machine translation of (most probably in violation of copyright) a source in language other than English, probably Kazakh. That said, it appears to be about "Dede Korkut" - which WP:REDIRECT-s to Book of Dede Korkut. Places and people mentioned in the draft:
Do you think the draft still meets the WP:G1 speedy deletion criterion? In my opinion, no as of 12 Jan 2021. Maybe let's see what happens further on? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:37, 12 January 2021 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: December 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Nomination of Statue of Ruth Bader Ginsburg for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Ruth Bader Ginsburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
|
A barnstar for you!
|
The Surreal Barnstar |
| You got a shoutout in The Guardian today, who seem to have taken the liberty of promoting you to "administrator". This barnstar is more generally for your work on breaking-news topics, where I've seen you around a lot. Thanks for your contributions! — Bilorv (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC) |
- @Bilorv: Wow, thanks! First I'm hearing of this mention. Much appreciated, ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Brix Tavern
| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Brix Tavern at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 08:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
Extended content
|
|---|
@Gerald Waldo Luis: Putting this on your radar, if you're interested. Somewhat related, you might be interested to see Pastini Pastaria and The Liquor Store were nominated for deletion. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Nomination for merging of Template:WPUS50
Template:WPUS50 has been nominated for merging with Template:WikiProject United States. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Downton Draggy
Extended content
|
|---|
 Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Downton Draggy". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC) |
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
The Roxy (Portland, Oregon)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:06, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Stone House
Thanks for the heads-up about the Stone House article. I like the direct quotes. Watch out for all that satanic graffiti! Finetooth (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
International note
FYI, you might be a notable Wikipedian "shining beacon lighting the way to a better future" (maybe not notable, but I'm really not sure)! You were mentioned in The Guardian. I noticed when I was building the "In the media" section of the upcoming edition of The Signpost. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bri, Bilorv put this on my radar in the barnstar above, but thanks for double checking. I was surprised to learn of this mention! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:02, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Bri, I was mentioned in this one as well, if you've not included in your Signpost summary. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:05, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Statue redirects
You should know better than most that a lot of famous people already have one or more statues of them. I just fixed 11 of your redirects (so far) of statues to articles that already exist, some of which you even created. The garden doesn't exist yet (and there's a decent chance it never does either) so it doesn't make sense to have redirects for each of the statues. The "(National Garden of American Heroes)" ones are fine (not that that's a search term), but the rest the point to something that doesn't exist and may be misleading aren't, whether or not the existing statue is notable. Reywas92Talk 02:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Reywas92, Thanks for the note. I plan to do a round of appropriate redirecting and disambiguation page creation, in addition to the couple I've already created. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:10, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Mary Jane Holland (song)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Jane Holland". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
|
Editing news 2021 #1
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter Reply tool The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.
Research notes:
New discussion tool The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[4] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page. Next: Notifications During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications. |
WiR focus on Black women in February
I've created the page for this event. Please let me know if it's ok. Perhaps you have some ideas on additional redlists or simply individual names.--Ipigott (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Ipigott, Thanks!, I've linked to this page at the top of Wikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives Matter/Q1 2021. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:52, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Dropped Your Hand While Dancing
Hi there! I was looking through my watchlist and saw your addition of Dropped Your Hand While Dancing to the Taylor Swift template. Now, I'm not sure what your plan is, but personally, I don't believe there needs to be a separate article for this. No other compilation has it's own separate page, as previous ones have been grouped at Folklore_(Taylor_Swift_album)#Compilations. Since you were the creator of the article, I thought you should know what I thought. Thanks. TheCartoonEditor. talk to me? see what i've done 21:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- TheCartoonEditor, I've already redirected the page. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:24, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- I think a similar track list update is needed at Evermore (Taylor Swift album), though. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Working on that right now! :) TheCartoonEditor. talk to me? see what i've done 22:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2021)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your GA nomination of Cricket Cafe
The article Cricket Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cricket Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 09:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Lee Vilenski, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Music (2021 film) poster
Hi! I am a little confused about why the US theatrical poster uploaded by someone to the Music film page was removed? I'm not sure who else to ask so just thought I'd put it here. Hope that's okay! thanks Peterpie123rww (talk) 12:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Peterpie123rww, Hello! I've been following development of the film and soundtrack articles. However, I've not been paying attention to how the posters have been added/removed over time. Your best bet is to start a discussion on the article's Talk page so editors can discusses which poster(s) to use. Keep in mind, copyrighted images can only be used under fair use. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Books & Bytes - Issue 42
Extended content
|
|---|
|
 Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC) |
"2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 26#2020 coronavirus pandemic in Maine (redirect) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 07:39, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Only 22 minutes from news article posting to your moving of the page! Also, I converted the link to a citation template for you. Jason McHuff (talk) 07:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
- Jmchuff, Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Famous now
Hey buddy, saw you got name dropped in the Guardian. That's awesome haha. I saw it and I'm like "I know that guy!" Giacobbe talk 22:22, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- Kudos on the mention! When sticking around Wikipedia for long enough, it can easily happen for editors, especially those who work on prominent articles. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- @(CA)Giacobbe and SNUGGUMS: Thanks, both! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- My pleasure :) SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 22:47, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
- @(CA)Giacobbe and SNUGGUMS: Thanks, both! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:41, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 | → | Archive 40 |