User talk:Another Believer/Archive 32
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020). 
|
Spoopy
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the GOCE of the article Spoopy has been completed.
There were only very minor tweaks made to it. Congratulations on its GA status.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Superbloom (disambiguation)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hello Another Believer, Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and it's nice to meet you :-) I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Superbloom (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page. If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator. For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. |
Alphabetizing
Question—how are these being alphabetized? I just added Kameron alphabetized by first name as consensus seemed to be for drag queens, but I noticed that Derrick Barry, for example, seems to be alphabetized by her last name (and Marcelino Sambé, who isn't a drag queen, is alphabetized by first name). There are a few more cases like that, too. Obviously not a big thing, but just wondering. Armadillopteryxtalk 16:23, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, People add to the list differently. I try to list people by last name, with exceptions for drag queens (who are generally sorted by first name). Some people just add to the top of the list. A bit of cleanup is probably needed. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 August 2020
- Special report: Wikipedia and the End of Open Collaboration?
- COI and paid editing: Some strange people edit Wikipedia for money
- News and notes: Abstract Wikipedia, a hoax, sex symbols, and a new admin
- In the media: Dog days gone bad
- Discussion report: Fox News, a flight of RfAs, and banning policy
- Featured content: Remembering Art, Valor, and Freedom
- Traffic report: Now for something completely different
- News from the WMF: New Chinese national security law in Hong Kong could limit the privacy of Wikipedia users
- Obituaries: Hasteur and Brian McNeil
Orphaned non-free image File:Give Up the Ghost album cover.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Haus Laboratories
Hello, I wondered if you wouldn't mind to take a look and help me to expand this draft. Thanks GagaNutellatalk 00:13, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- GagaNutella, I went ahead and moved the article into main space. The community can decide its fate. Thanks and good luck! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:51, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Americans Against Insecure Billionaires with Tiny Hands
Extended content
|
|---|
 Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Americans Against Insecure Billionaires with Tiny Hands". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Nathan2055talk - contribs 08:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC) |
Congratulations!
Congratulations on being quoted in a Washington Post article. [1] You've done a lot of excellent work! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 17:38, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- UncleBubba, Thank you! I had assumed I was just being interviewed for background info so I was pleasantly surprised! Happy editing, ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:18, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Message added 22:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
If you can help, regards.. Titodutta (talk) 22:38, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes I knew it was definitely not your fault. For 2 reasons I posted on the VP directly a) other people are also using the script, and b) to keep it "non-personal", that's why did not mention you directly in the post. If the script is triggering email and other notification, that's bad. If you want to test please archive "Sumit Arora" section here User talk:Titodutta. I'll let you know if I get an email/notification. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 22:49, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Titodutta,
Done ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:54, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Titodutta,
- Yep, unfortunately. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 22:58, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is super weird, actually. I've never previously gotten a ping notification when a thread I was tagged in got archived (even if the archiver also had a signature in the discussion), but this week it's happened two or three times already (including just now at Talk:Christmas Queens 3/Archive 1 and four days ago at Talk:Kameron Michaels/Archive 1). Do we know if there's been a change in the way pings are coded? Previously a new signature had to be added as four tildes in order for anyone tagged in the post to be notified; in fact, Template:Ping fix explains:
The notifications system only informs a user when you link their username in the same saved edit as you successfully sign your post. A ping cannot be fixed in a later edit by adding your signature or fixing a botched username.
I wonder what's going on. Armadillopteryx 16:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)- Armadillopteryx, Something must have changed. @Titodutta: Making you aware of this comment for additional context. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:57, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
The West Christmas Ever copyedit
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for The West Christmas Ever at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Stay well and all the best, Miniapolis 19:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Statue of Hans Christian Heg
On 15 August 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Statue of Hans Christian Heg, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a statue (pictured) of Hans Christian Heg, a Union soldier and abolitionist, was torn down by protesters, decapitated, and thrown into a lake following the arrest of a Black Lives Matter member? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Statue of Hans Christian Heg. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Statue of Hans Christian Heg), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Keep up the good work. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
- Lil-unique1, Hey, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:25, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Wandering Rocks
Hi Another Believer - I notice you've reversed a page move I did for Wandering Rocks (sculpture). Any reason why you think Wandering Rocks (AP) is a better name? There's nothing in the article which mentions what AP refers to, so unless people already know something about the sculpture that the article doesn't say, it's not an easy title to search for. Grutness...wha? 04:37, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Grutness, I understand, but there are multiple sculptures called "Wandering Rocks", hence why I turned the page into a disambiguation page. This source confirms Edition AP. I'm open to moving the page, if needed, but not to "Wandering Rocks (sculpture)". ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:39, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Would Wandering Rocks (Seattle sculpture) work? Grutness...wha? 04:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Grutness, Maybe? I'd recommend submitting a move request so other editors can weigh in. Or, try asking at WikiProject Sculpture about possible naming conventions? ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- AP usually means Artist's proof. That's likely the case here. There are 5 editions, 1–5 and one artist's proof. Vexations (talk) 21:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Grutness, Maybe? I'd recommend submitting a move request so other editors can weigh in. Or, try asking at WikiProject Sculpture about possible naming conventions? ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:42, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- Would Wandering Rocks (Seattle sculpture) work? Grutness...wha? 04:41, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Chi Chi DeVayne
ITN recognition for Chi Chi DeVayne
On 21 August 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chi Chi DeVayne, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru (talk) 12:44, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
GOCE
| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Chi Chi DeVayne at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 05:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC) |
- @Baffle gab1978: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, Another Believer. I'm just posting to let you know that Grammy Award for Best Contemporary Jazz Album – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 14. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 22:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
- Giants2008, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:31, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.jpg)
Dis' sayin'
You think
- a bullet (think bullethole)
looks less silly than
- this?
Carry on. --Brogo13 (talk) 20:43, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you for the edit "thank you"! TiMike (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2020 (UTC) |
- @TiMike: Thank you for the barnstar! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:40, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: You're welcome!
Redirects for discussion
"Percentage (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
Resolved
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Percentage (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 29#Percentage (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
"Los Angeles Real Estate" listed at Redirects for discussion
Resolved
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Los Angeles Real Estate. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Los Angeles Real Estate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
"Don't Poke the Bear" listed at Redirects for discussion
Resolved
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Don't Poke the Bear. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Don't Poke the Bear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 2pou (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
The Signpost: 30 August 2020
- News and notes: The high road and the low road
- In the media: Storytelling large and small
- Featured content: Going for the goal
- Special report: Wikipedia's not so little sister is finding its own way
- Op-Ed: The longest-running hoax
- Traffic report: Heart, soul, umbrellas, and politics
- News from the WMF: Fourteen things we’ve learned by moving Polish Wikimedia conference online
- Recent research: Detecting spam, and pages to protect; non-anonymous editors signal their intelligence with high-quality articles
- Arbitration report: A slow couple of months
- From the archives: Wikipedia for promotional purposes?
This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Editing news 2020 #4
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter Reply tool The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.
The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF). The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space. New requirements for user signatures
Next: New discussion toolNext, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist. |
WikiCup
WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC) |
WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is The other finalists were All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
.svg){kind=small}
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
|
Badlands (Live at Webster Hall)
I would be happy if you could expand the entry Badlands (Live at Webster Hall) I do not know the English Wikipedia I am from the Israeli Wikipedia so it is difficult for me. King G.A (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- King G.A, I have other articles on my plate right now but I'll see what I can do and continue to watch the page as other editors contribute. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
- If you can at least the opening of the album create just normal. King G.A (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Nomination of Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bust of Bernardo O'Higgins (Houston) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 19:46, 7 September 2020 (UTC) |
Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1 has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:44, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Disloyal
Why did you move the existing stub article into draftspace so that you could restart the article? Why didn't you build on the existing article? We should WP:PRESERVE. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, I didn't move the stub into draft space. I simply created Disloyal: A Memoir not knowing someone else had already moved Disloyal into draft space (which I don't think was necessary). ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ah my mistake. I thought that seemed like an odd thing for you to do. I see now who did it. Wouldn't it be better to move the draft back to preserve the article history? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, I don't think preserving the draft history is required in this case since the stubs were created independently, but if the author of the original stub feels inclined to request a histmerge, that's their choice. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:41, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ah my mistake. I thought that seemed like an odd thing for you to do. I see now who did it. Wouldn't it be better to move the draft back to preserve the article history? – Muboshgu (talk) 21:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
PRODs
Being unsourced is not, in itself, a valid reason for speedy deletion. In order to justify deletion, there has to have been "thorough attempts to find reliable sources". Merely being unsourced, even for a long time, is not evidence that "thorough attempts" have been made to find sources. - dcljr (talk) 17:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Dcljr, Ok, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:27, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Just a suggestion
You might want to look at the school article you prodded yesterday that was deprodded for a spurious reason. A vulture kinda picked it over. AfD, anyone? John from Idegon (talk) 08:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- John from Idegon, Yeah, User:Dcljr seems to think my PRODs were inappropriate... I don't really think these pages are worth saving but I'll let the community sort this out. ---Another Believer (Talk) 12:51, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: I assume you mean Children's Paradise School? Please note that the dePRODding was not spurious: the original PROD was based on an invented criterion. (In fact, dePRODs cannot be spurious, as they can be done for literally any reason.) Anyway, I have no opinions about what ultimately happens to the article, as long as it's done within our guidelines. - dcljr (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article was deleted. If you're some how pround of yourself for wasting a week of other people in the projects time because you don't know what notability means, you feel good about that. Bravo. You've made grand improvements. You made deleting a pile of crap involve numerous other editors and an extra weeks time. As I said, Bravo. Be proud of yourself. John from Idegon (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Wouldn't have happend if PROD hadn't been misused. - dcljr (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- PROD wasn't misused. There's a difference between WP:Proposed deletion and WP:Speedy deletion which you cited in the removal and it's quite astonishing someone who's been around as long as you doesn't know it. The Children's Paradise School indeed meets WP:DEL-REASON #6 and #7, so the PROD was very well applied, but now you're wasting people's time at AFD on non-notable articles. Reywas92Talk 05:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Heh… Somehow I missed the words "do not" in the statement, "is meant for uncomplicated deletion proposals that do not meet the strict criteria for speedy deletion" at WP:PROD. My bad. I was under the impression that PROD was somehow an alternative method of getting something speedily deleted. (This was the first time the process had come to my attention, AFAIR. I was already well aware of deletion discussions and speedy deletion through {{Db}}, etc.) In any case, I did look at WP:DEL-REASON, as well, before I did anything. (In other words, just to be clear: I still would have contested the PRODs, even if I had only relied on DEL-REASON and not brought speedy deletion into this at all.) As for "#6 and #7", I direct you to the phrases "cannot possibly" and "thorough attempts" in those reasons. There was no indication in any of the PRODs that reliable sources were actually searched for and not found, or that such sources "could not possibly" exist, merely that the articles had lain there unsourced for a long time. I still say, that in itself is not a sufficient reason for deletion, unless attempts have actually been made to find RSs — in which case, just say that in the PRODs. (And, BTW, John from Idegon brought up "notability" above, which has also been cited in subsequent edits to many of the pages in question by Another Believer: "notability" wasn't mentioned in the PRODs, either. If you don't want things like this happening in the future, just properly justify the PRODs in the first place.) Literally the only reason I got involved at all was that the articles' long-term unsourced status was the only justification given; I objected to that as a justification for deletion, so I contested the PRODs, which was entirely consistent with WP:CONTESTED. If that bothers you, well, I don't know what to tell you. You will be happy to know that I had not planned on being involved in any other PROD activities well before this particular discussion was initiated. So, we need not ever encounter each other again. Bye. - dcljr (talk) 20:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- PROD wasn't misused. There's a difference between WP:Proposed deletion and WP:Speedy deletion which you cited in the removal and it's quite astonishing someone who's been around as long as you doesn't know it. The Children's Paradise School indeed meets WP:DEL-REASON #6 and #7, so the PROD was very well applied, but now you're wasting people's time at AFD on non-notable articles. Reywas92Talk 05:54, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- Wouldn't have happend if PROD hadn't been misused. - dcljr (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- The article was deleted. If you're some how pround of yourself for wasting a week of other people in the projects time because you don't know what notability means, you feel good about that. Bravo. You've made grand improvements. You made deleting a pile of crap involve numerous other editors and an extra weeks time. As I said, Bravo. Be proud of yourself. John from Idegon (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
- @John from Idegon: I assume you mean Children's Paradise School? Please note that the dePRODding was not spurious: the original PROD was based on an invented criterion. (In fact, dePRODs cannot be spurious, as they can be done for literally any reason.) Anyway, I have no opinions about what ultimately happens to the article, as long as it's done within our guidelines. - dcljr (talk) 22:57, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Dual Barnstars
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| For a great collection of photographs from Mexico. Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC) |
|
The Citation Barnstar | |
| Great job of leading a colloboration on Six Flags AstroWorld. Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 20:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC) |
- @Oldsanfelipe2: Thanks for both of these! Still hoping to see the AstroWorld article promoted to Good status at some point. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:28, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello, saw that you were considering merging this. I found some other sources for this comp, which seems to have been the most notable of the 7 or 8. Just wanted to ask your opinion first, thanks. Caro7200 (talk) 22:32, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Caro7200, Sure, if you can please add those sources or at least share them on the article's talk page, that'd be very helpful. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:33, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Public art in Cambridge, Massachusetts
Thanks. :) Ber31 (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ber31, Sure thing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
Books & Bytes
Books & Bytes – Issue 40
Extended content
|
|---|
|
 Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC) |
Books & Bytes – Issue 41
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Books & Bytes
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: August 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Eliot Hall (Reed College)
Hello:
I finished the copy edit partly done by another user of the article Eliot Hall (Reed College).
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 12:24, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
GAC India Ferrah
I'm doing the review for India Ferrah/GA1. Everything looks good, except for two items mentioned on the template. You need to be consistent on gender in the article, and we need sourcing for one item under Television. — Maile (talk) 18:15, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, Thanks! Looking now. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Maile66, Thanks for reviewing the article! If you're interested in a similar Good article nominee (by another editor, but I've been following along and support the article's promotion), you might take a look at Kameron Michaels. Either way, thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
India Ferrah GA
Congrats on the GA! I got your ping from the review page, but it seems a reply is not needed now? Armadillopteryx 21:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, Correct. Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
_001.jpg)
What is WikiProject Joe Biden?
It seems to be a redlink category getting added to a lot of articles. Isn't a project supposed to be a group of people working together on some topic or area? HouseOfChange (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Please do not create any new WikiProjects in future unless it has been discussed and there is consensus among a group of editors that the project is needed. Otherwise your actions are disruptive, no matter how honorable your intentions are. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:32, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Noted, but not promised. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors September 2020 Newsletter
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC) |
Church of Our Lady of Guadalupe (Puerto Vallarta)
Hello:
The rewrite copy edit (
) you requested of the article Church of Our Lady of Guadalupe (Puerto Vallarta) has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Much appreciated! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:18, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
October editathons from Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
1776 Commission
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 The article 1776 Commission has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of 1776 Commission for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1776 Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bishonen | tålk 11:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC) |
Your draft article, Draft:Fantasea II: The Second Wave
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fantasea II: The Second Wave". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 08:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 27 September 2020
- Special report: Paid editing with political connections
- News and notes: More large-scale errors at a "small" wiki
- In the media: WIPO, Seigenthaler incident 15 years later
- Featured content: Life finds a Way
- Arbitration report: Clarifications and requests
- Traffic report: Is there no justice?
- Recent research: Wikipedia's flood biases
This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Bust of Hadrian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer,
I noticed that you have done some editing on this article and a new editor added a lot of material that they had developed in their user space. There are some useful references in there so reversion isn't appropriate but I'm not familiar with this article and I'm hoping you could look it over and see if the additions are improvements or unnecessary embellishments. Thanks Liz Read! Talk! 23:34, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
- Liz, Yes, I'll try to remember to take a look soon, and I'll also post a note at WP:420. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 A tag has been placed on Category:WikiProject Rufus Wainwright articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
|
Draft FYI
I started Draft:Jazelle Barbie Royale if you're interested in having a look and expanding. Cheers! ☆ Bri (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- Bri, Wonderful, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:50, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: September 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article The Westerly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Your prod of SLIR somehow failed
I just came across SLIR and was looking through the creator's talk page, and saw a notification of a proposed deletion. However, looking back through the edit history, I can't find any time you edited the page, and no indication of a PROD tag. You might want to check your Twinkle configuration. Vahurzpu (talk) 19:13, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- Vahurzpu, Hmm, bizarre. SLIR is mentioned here: User:Another Believer/PROD log. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:15, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
- AfD. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Ridgefield Cemetery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Leda Valladares
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Leda Valladares has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Thanks!
Thanks for your helpful contributions to Mango (Saturday Night Live)! Just a friendly heads up, you forgot to bold your thing at the thing. Right cite (talk) 16:00, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Right cite, Thanks, but I don't always worry about bolding text within comments/votes. I've read WP:AfD and bold text is not required. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
- Okay no problem. You too! Right cite (talk) 16:04, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
Lady Red Couture
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Lady Red Couture has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Best of luck with the GAN.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
GOCE requests
Hey, in the future, could you just give me a heads-up if you submit an article I've written alone to the GOCE? I was confused, shocked and a little upset to see that drive-through of Lady Red. As we discussed last year when Honey's article was up for GA, I copy edit professionally and have found GOCE edits to my articles to mostly introduce unambiguous errors and make otherwise neutral/subjective changes. It's a time-consuming pain to have to go through and re-correct all those "corrections" when the article was actually in better shape beforehand. Obviously no one owns any article, and anyone is free to make a GOCE request, but I would be very grateful for a courtesy ping if you make a request for an article to which I am the sole major contributor. Armadillopteryx 11:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, Sorry, I'll try to remember. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
- No worries, and thanks! Armadillopteryx 19:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 1 November 2020
- News and notes: Ban on IPs on ptwiki, paid editing for Tatarstan, IP masking
- In the media: Murder, politics, religion, health and books
- Book review: Review of Wikipedia @ 20
- Discussion report: Proposal to change board composition, In The News dumps Trump story
- Featured content: The "Green Terror" is neither green nor sufficiently terrifying. Worst Hallowe'en ever.
- Traffic report: Jump back, what's that sound?
- Interview: Joseph Reagle and Jackie Koerner
- News from the WMF: Meet the 2020 Wikimedian of the Year
- Recent research: OpenSym 2020: Deletions and gender, masses vs. elites, edit filters
- In focus: The many (reported) deaths of Wikipedia
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Jamal Sims
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Jamal Sims has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Jamal Sims for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamal Sims until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 14:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
|
November 21st ~ NYC COVID-19: Environmental Justice in Public Health Edit-A-Thon
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Wil540 art (talk) 17:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
| |||
Nomination of Palace Theatre (Silverton, Oregon) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palace Theatre (Silverton, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
.JPG)
This Month in GLAM: October 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Bust of Mahatma Gandhi, Shanghai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
The Roxy (Portland, Oregon)
Your GA nomination of The Roxy (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 11:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Roxy (Portland, Oregon)
The article The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:The Roxy (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- Congrats! Armadillopteryx 11:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis and Armadillopteryx: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Gerald Waldo Luis and Armadillopteryx: BTW, I've just nominated Delta Cafe as well if you're interested in another PDX restaurant. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Current Events
Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Current Event WikiProject for the edits you have done on Portal:Current events and other articles in the WikiProject's scope. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to invite you and hope you consider joining. (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Elijahandskip, Thanks! I write about current events often, but pay very little attention to the current events portal. ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Keep up the good work! ArriehM (talk) 11:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Minor Barnstar
|
The Minor Barnstar | |
| Thank you so much for the small edits you do, like ordering and grammar checking. They are so valuable to Wikipedia! Elijahandskip (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC) |
- @Elijahandskip: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Discussion at Village pump (idea lab)
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab) § How can we better consolidate and discourage creation of overly-specific WikiProjects?. I'd particularly highlight Iridescent's comment, which presents better than I could an example of how inactive projects can be harmful. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Delta Cafe
Your GA nomination of Delta Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Delta Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 13:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Delta Cafe
The article Delta Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Delta Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 09:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Gerald Waldo Luis, Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Translations
Hi! I am new to wikipedia and have asked advice from other users where should I start if I want to contribute by doing translations. One of them advised that you were looking for help with Russian translations. If this is still the case, could you help me find a list of articles in Russian that require translation. Thank you! LoraxJr 20:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- LoraxJr, I sometimes seek help translating English articles into other languages, but I'm not sure about Russian entries needing translation into English. Is that what you're asking? ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- I could translate English articles into Russian too if that is needed. Could you notify me when something like that comes up? LoraxJr 21:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- LoraxJr, Well, I assume someone else mentioned this request to translate quality articles about drag queens into other languages, but my goal here was mostly to get articles promoted to Good/Featured status. More generally, I think you should just translate whatever articles interest you personally! Translation work is very important, but you should enjoy the content you're translating. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- That would be one of the topics I could work on. Thank you, I will look into that.LoraxJr 21:19, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- LoraxJr, Great, thanks! I write about a lot of different topics. If you seen any FAs/GAs on my profile page (User:Another Believer), I'd love to see some of them translated into other languages as well. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Boxer Ramen
Your GA nomination of Boxer Ramen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Boxer Ramen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 13:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Boxer Ramen
The article Boxer Ramen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Boxer Ramen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of REDMAN 2019 -- REDMAN 2019 (talk) 16:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- REDMAN 2019, Thanks! I've just nominated Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) if you or Gerald Waldo Luis are interested. Either way, happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
Your GA nomination of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
The article Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon)
The article Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Roman Candle (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
XLB (Portland, Oregon)
Your GA nomination of XLB (Portland, Oregon)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article XLB (Portland, Oregon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 14:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of XLB (Portland, Oregon)
The article XLB (Portland, Oregon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:XLB (Portland, Oregon) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Club Feathers
Do you think it would be reasonable to nominate Club Feathers for GA? I feel it's written on par with my other venue GAs, but I have reservations about that since there do not appear to be any images available to add to the article. Not sure if that would normally be a deal-breaker at GAN. Armadillopteryx 01:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Armadillopteryx, Go for it! Not being illustrated is not a deal-breaker. I've just nominated Brix Tavern myself. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks! Armadillopteryx 01:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
December with Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Davis Street Tavern
Your GA nomination of Davis Street Tavern
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Davis Street Tavern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- That's an interesting article, AB! From its talk page I realized there's a project in destubbing articles, I'll see if I can contribute. I recently nominated Ave Maryam as FAC, perhaps you can give advice. GeraldWL 17:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Davis Street Tavern
The article Davis Street Tavern you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Davis Street Tavern for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 17:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Gerald Waldo Luis, Thanks! I've nominated Brix Tavern, Byways Cafe, and Pied Cow Coffeehouse as well. I'm in the midst of a Portland restaurant blitz, apparently! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
Brix Tavern
Your GA nomination of Brix Tavern
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brix Tavern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 05:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Brix Tavern
The article Brix Tavern you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brix Tavern for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:21, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Byways Cafe
Your GA nomination of Byways Cafe
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Byways Cafe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 15:01, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Byways Cafe
The article Byways Cafe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Byways Cafe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Gigi Goode
| Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Gigi Goode at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 02:14, 29 November 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:31, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 November 2020
- News and notes: Jimmy Wales "shouldn't be kicked out before he's ready"
- Op-Ed: Re-righting Wikipedia
- Opinion: How billionaires re-write Wikipedia
- Featured content: Frontonia sp. is thankful for delicious cyanobacteria
- Traffic report: 007 with Borat, the Queen, and an election
- News from Wiki Education: An assignment that changed a life: Kasey Baker
- GLAM plus: West Coast New Zealand's Wikipedian at Large
- Wikicup report: Lee Vilenski wins the 2020 WikiCup
- Recent research: Wikipedia's Shoah coverage succeeds where libraries fail
- Essay: Writing about women
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
,_Bestanddeelnr_923-3697.jpg)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | Archive 34 | Archive 35 |