User talk:Another Believer/Archive 31
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
WikiCup 2020 May newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The second round of the 2020 WikiCup has now finished. It was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 75 points to advance to round 3. There were some very impressive efforts in round 2, with the top ten contestants all scoring more than 500 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 186 good articles achieved in total by contestants, and the 355 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures. Our top scorers in round 2 were:
The rules for featured article reviews have been adjusted; reviews may cover three aspects of the article, content, images and sources, and contestants may receive points for each of these three types of review. Please also remember the requirement to mention the WikiCup when undertaking an FAR for which you intend to claim points. Remember also that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC) |
.svg){kind=small}
Administrators' newsletter – May 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020). 
|
Editors of the Week
Extended content
|
|---|
|
As is normal I have placed the Award on the talk page of the recipient (usually an individual). We EDDY clerks would love for all your members to be aware of their deserved "pat on the back". Soon I will be adding a banner to go along with the Award. Maybe members can display the banner on their talk page. ―Buster7 ☎ 15:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
|
Time for hemp in Oregon?
Since Hemp in Oregon is a redirect, maybe it's a high priority topic for the project we recently completed. Next year maybe? Or start sooner? You probably are more clued into the Oregon scene than I am, but I noticed in at least one county in 2019, it was the most-planted crop by acreage; according to report, it went up over 400% between 2018 and 2019 statewide [1]. For comparison it's about 50% more acres than hops in Washington (Yakima Valley does the majority of U.S. production). ☆ Bri (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Bri, I think this redirect link should be added to the page of 420 links for future expansion. I'd be interested in tackling this at some point. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:01, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 19, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
MfD nomination of Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
|
Speedy deletion nomination of The Alaska Triangle
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Alaska Triangle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HeartGlow30797 (talk) 05:33, 5 May 2020 (UTC) |
DYK for Charlotte Figi
On 6 May 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charlotte Figi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charlotte Figi, a child who used cannabidiol to treat seizures caused by Dravet syndrome, had a medical cannabis strain named after her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charlotte Figi. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Charlotte Figi), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:Albums postponed due to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 |
"All I Ask" (Adele song)
Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the GOCE of the article "All I Ask" has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Twofingered Typist, Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for being part of the Symposium on Wikipedia and COVID-19 today
I liked the format and your contribution to it. Looking forward to the next round. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
- Daniel Mietchen, Thank you very much! I enjoyed participating. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:28, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Real Life Barnstar |
| Wonderful job at the NY COVID-19 conference today. Moxy 🍁 01:39, 10 May 2020 (UTC) |
- @Moxy: Why, thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:00, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Statue of Harvey W. Scott
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
_-_23.JPG)
Your GA nomination of Statue of Harvey W. ScottHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Statue of Harvey W. Scott you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Statue of Harvey W. ScottThe article Statue of Harvey W. Scott you nominated as a good article has passed
|
This week's article for improvement (week 20, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
This Month in GLAM: April 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Frank E. Beach Memorial Fountain
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
 Your GA nomination of Frank E. Beach Memorial FountainHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Frank E. Beach Memorial Fountain you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Frank E. Beach Memorial FountainThe article Frank E. Beach Memorial Fountain you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Frank E. Beach Memorial FountainThe article Frank E. Beach Memorial Fountain you nominated as a good article has passed
Frank E. Beach Memorial Fountain
|
This week's article for improvement (week 21, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
_(cropped).jpg)
Public art definition
Public art can include murals like The Twelve Labors of Hercules (Spafford), right? ☆ Bri (talk) 17:08, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
- Bri, Yup! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Another Sia article
Hello Another Believer, how are you ?
It's just to say that I've pushed the article about the David Guetta & Sia song "Flames" towards the french Good Article certification, if you're intersted. By the way, I've done the same with the jazz standard "After You've Gone". I need to finalized, but I will try to do the same with the translation of Lady Croissant.
Greetings from France ! --TaupeGun (talk) 23:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- TaupeGun, Thanks for the heads up! I'm happy to see Sia song articles expanded and promoted to Good status at French Wikipedia. Great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Art Building (University of Texas at Austin)
Extended content
|
|---|
 The article Art Building (University of Texas at Austin) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Art Building (University of Texas at Austin) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art Building (University of Texas at Austin) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 14:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC) |
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article Batts Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Benedict Hall
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The article Benedict Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Benedict Hall for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benedict Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 14:33, 25 May 2020 (UTC) |
Biological Laboratories
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The article Biological Laboratories has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing |
Nomination of Biological Laboratories for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biological Laboratories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. User:Namiba 14:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC) |
India Ferrah
 | Hello, Another Believer. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for India Ferrah at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! LegesRomanorum (talk) 13:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC) |
- @LegesRomanorum: Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:36, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Drag Is Magic
Extended content
|
|---|
Your GA nomination of Drag Is MagicHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Drag Is Magic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Drag Is MagicThe article Drag Is Magic you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold
Your GA nomination of Drag Is MagicThe article Drag Is Magic you nominated as a good article has passed
Drag Is MagicHi there, I've just completed the copy-edit of Drag Is Magic, as you requested (and thank you so much: it was really informative and a pleasure to read!). Can I please ask that, if you're planning to nominate an article for (e.g.) Good Article status, you wait until the requested copy-edit is complete before nominating? (As suggested in the instructions on the GOCE requests page). I notice you've made a few copy-edit requests pending Good Article nomination. Best wishes, LegesRomanorum (talk) 09:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
|
Vagina (album)
Extended content
|
|---|
Your GA nomination of Vagina (album)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vagina (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Vagina (album)The article Vagina (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Vagina (album)The article Vagina (album) you nominated as a good article has passed
Vagina copy editVagina (album) was in good shape, I had to really look for improvements. I felt the quote ratio was a bit high and tried paraphrasing a bit – bringing it from 212 of 647 words to 160 of 660 words (not counting the block quote). Feel free to revert anything you don't like. P.S.: why wasn't there a DYK for this? ... that drag queen Alaska Thunderfuck surprised the media when she revealed her new Vagina in a television commercial? – Reidgreg (talk) 22:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 22, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
June 2020 at Women in Red
 June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The West Christmas Ever
Extended content
|
|---|
Your GA nomination of The West Christmas EverHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The West Christmas Ever you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of The West Christmas EverThe article The West Christmas Ever you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of The West Christmas EverThe article The West Christmas Ever you nominated as a good article has passed
|
Fountain for Company H
Extended content
|
|---|
 Your GA nomination of Fountain for Company HHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Fountain for Company H you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Fountain for Company HThe article Fountain for Company H you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold
Your GA nomination of Fountain for Company HThe article Fountain for Company H you nominated as a good article has passed
|
Request for a Mass Message
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Attached is a copy of a mass message that was sent out back in 2016. The EOTW cupboard is down to 3. I wonder if I could trouble you to send out a new mailing. Yours is one of the few names I recognized on the list of mass mailers. P[ease use Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week#Members as the mailing list. Thanks!―Buster7 ☎ 22:51, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Editor of the Week : nominations needed!The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful. The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations? Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today! Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC) |
Omar Jimenez
Wikipedia:BIO1E concerns about Omar Jimenez
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi Another Believer, Does the creation of the Omar Jimenez article fall under the Wikipedia:BIO1E guideline? I understand that his arrest is making headlines, but I'm not sure if Jimenez was notable prior to this incident. I am considering bringing this article to AfD, but wanted to discuss with you first. Natg 19 (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
|
Nomination of Omar Jimenez for deletion
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Jimenez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Natg 19 (talk) 05:14, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Thanks, question
Hi! Thanks for approving the article on COVID in Peel. I'm curious what "let the community decide the fate of this article" means? -- OVSimone (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- OVSimone, Sure! I was comfortable moving the draft page into the main space but other editors may decide to further improve, redirect, or delete the page if they deem appropriate. In other words, I just meant my action did not prevent actions by others. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:24, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 May 2020
- From the editor: Meltdown May?
- News and notes: 2019 Picture of the Year, 200 French paid editing accounts blocked, 10 years of Guild Copyediting
- Discussion report: WMF's Universal Code of Conduct
- Featured content: Weathering the storm
- Arbitration report: Board member likely to receive editing restriction
- Traffic report: Come on and slam, and welcome to the jam
- Gallery: Wildlife photos by the book
- News from the WMF: WMF Board announces Community Culture Statement
- Recent research: Automatic detection of covert paid editing; Wiki Workshop 2020
- Community view: Transit routes and mapping during stay-at-home order downtime
- WikiProject report: Revitalizing good articles
- On the bright side: 500,000 articles in the Egyptian Arabic Wikipedia
This week's article for improvement (week 23, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Administrators' newsletter – June 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).
|
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello! I just wanted to tell you that I have a current Featured Article nomination, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Bikini Porn/archive1. If you have time to leave some comments there, it would be really appreciated. Thank you. Regards! --Paparazzzi (talk) 00:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Administration
Would you like to be an admin? ( P. S. If so, nominate yourself. ) Another Wiki User the 2nd (talk) 16:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Another Wiki User the 2nd, Hello! I've been asked to become an admin at least a couple dozen times over the past decade, both on- and off-wiki, but I've never bothered to take the plunge. I'd like to think I'd be confirmed, but I'm not sure I want to jump through those hoops right now. But thanks for thinking of me! ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Two Indeterminate Lines for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Two Indeterminate Lines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Black Lives Matter Barnstar | |
| Clearly you deserve this :) —valereee (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |
- @Valereee: Thank you! Between WikiProject COVID-19, Wiki Loves Pride, and WikiProject BLM, I'm all over the place lately! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:42, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject proposal
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello Another Believer, I know you are busy with the BLM Wikiproject, but I was wondering if were willing to start a WikiProject on the Ku Klux Klan whenever you have time to do so. I hope this request doesn't make you uncomfortable after starting the BLM project. Honestly though, when you requested to have a BLM barnstar made, I was quite shocked because the day before I had made the KKK Barnstar. Jerm (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Poundcake (album)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi there, I'll be reviewing this page within the next 7 days. In the meantime, there are some additions you can make to the article. I've left comments here: Talk:Poundcake (album)/GA1. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Poundcake (album)Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Poundcake (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Poundcake (album)The article Poundcake (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold
Your GA nomination of Poundcake (album)The article Poundcake (album) you nominated as a good article has passed Poundcake (album)Hello: The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Poundcake (album) has been completed. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Regards, Twofingered Typist (talk) 17:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
|
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Black Lives Matter Barnstar | |
| for pioneering an important topic of modern American discourse. Quidster4040 (talk) 22:43, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |
- @Quidster4040: Thank you! ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:55, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Barnstar for an important topic
|
|
The Black Lives Matter Barnstar | |
| Thank you for creating space on Wikipedia for editors passionate about racial justice. Shrinkydinks (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you for the barnstar! --Another Believer (Talk) 12:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Attribution
Good morning AB, I have been told, at a minimum, to state in my edit summary that the bigger page is being split off to the smaller page, or that the smaller page was split from the bigger page. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
- Jax 0677, Ok, I understand. I think more specific attribution would be helpful longterm, but I know adding all the templates can be a pain. I'll see if I can get around to adding some 'coped' or 'split' templates later. Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
GOCE June newsletter
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 15:46, 5 June 2020 (UTC). |
Gallery
Extended content
|
|---|
|
If you don't mind I'd like to keep the Monument Ave. pictures in the gallery. As I see it, they have more impact there. The remaining ones are less impressive by themselves. deisenbe (talk) 19:34, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 24, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Gloria Victis
Extended content
|
|---|
 I appreciate your work on getting the article in better shape. There's still more historical background I haven't found yet but I decided it might be ready to go. I wasn't sure how to divide it into sections but I did some work on separating it into paragraphs, anyway. What I don't know how to do is find the source of the text "the bronze statue features an allegorical angel with outstretched wings dressed in robes with a laurel wreath on her head. In one hand she supports a dying soldier holding a battered rifle, while in her other hand—held high—she holds a second laurel wreath to place on the soldier when he expires". Somewhere in the history of List of Confederate monuments and memorials (from which List of Confederate monuments and memorials in North Carolina was split) those words were added. Three sources are given for the section and one I can't find, but it looks like it might be a source for something else. There's no way the exact words used by whoever added them are based on the two sources I did find. I'm wondering what to do at this point. The description seems important enough to keep but I don't know where it came from.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
|
A very minor point
Thanks for editing Niagara Square police violence incident. I noticed that you changed the "notes" section to "references". Normally, both are acceptable (see WP:REFLIST), and editors are not supposed to change one acceptable form to another (goes for this, but also e.g. for the type of references and so on). Like I said, this is very minor, and no need to change it back, but just something to keep in mind if you ever encounter another "notes" title for the footnotes / references section. Feel free to point out any similar minor rule I forgot about and should adhere to, there are probably enough examples of things I do while editing which are not what we are supposed to do either :-) Fram (talk) 14:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Fram, Ok, thanks, good to know. I prefer References for a list of sources and add Notes sections when there are notes to display other than the list of sources. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Campaignbox George Floyd protests
Template:Campaignbox George Floyd protests has been nominated for merging with Template:George Floyd protests. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 02:42, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Books & Bytes – Issue 39, May – June 2020
Extended content
|
|---|
|
 Books & Bytes
On behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC) |
Vance Monument
Extended content
|
|---|
 I'll let you take over. It bothered me seeing the article just sitting there but I figured I gave you plenty of chances to expand it. I just needed to wait a little longer. What do you think of this picture? People think the old BB&T building is ugly, though I admit yours is a better photo of the monument itself. I put your photo in the article about the building because the one that was there just wasn't very good.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
|
- An IP added some good information to the Vance Monument article but didn't give a source. I went ahead and reverted because it looked weird to say the same thing twice. The person did point out in an edit summary that the city council didn't actually vote to remove the monument, so that's good. I made sure what was left reflected what sources actually said and let the IP know to add a source with the other information added. My first though was that since it was good information, you added it, but as I looked closely, it was kind of a mess. I could tell the sources already there didn't say what was said.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- I'd like someone to look at my most recent additions. There were additional articles today, one on previous actions and another on the removal of other monuments, which I thought was relevant since those actions were part of the same joint resolution that is leading to action on the Vance Monument.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
- An IP added some good information to the Vance Monument article but didn't give a source. I went ahead and reverted because it looked weird to say the same thing twice. The person did point out in an edit summary that the city council didn't actually vote to remove the monument, so that's good. I made sure what was left reflected what sources actually said and let the IP know to add a source with the other information added. My first though was that since it was good information, you added it, but as I looked closely, it was kind of a mess. I could tell the sources already there didn't say what was said.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:37, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
lists of protests
Check out the end of this NYT article - in their list of cities they link to news articles verifying each one. Kind of the NYT to do all this work for us :) -- phoebe / (talk to me) 12:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh wow, this is super helpful and worth sharing. Thanks for the update. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Monument stuff
Hey Another Believer,
The CHAZ article seems to be stabilizing, so I'm moving my efforts over to monuments. I've started a navbox at Template:Monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests. I left a comment at the Confederate Memorial (Jacksonville, Florida)/Hemming Park merge proposal, but wanted to also let you know that much of the memorial content from that article appears to have been plagiarized from this site. I also have a proposal for refactoring the table on the list article and would appreciate your perspective. I'm probably going to tackle geocoordinates for all of these next. Let me know if you need anything. gobonobo + c 12:37, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- Related, in Oregon. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Gobonobo: Wonderful, I/we can always use more help with public art coverage! I'm constantly having to defend keeping standalone articles about notable monuments and works of art. I guess that's what I get for creating stubs, but I don't have the capacity to flesh out page after page after page as much as I'd like right from the start. But that's ok, Wikipedia's a work in progress and we'll have entries for them all eventually. I've watchlisted the monument template and will review your recent changes across pages soon. @Jonesey95: Oh, wow! This was not on my radar so thanks for the heads up. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:34, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 25, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Editing news 2020 #2 – Quick updates
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Read this in another language • Subscription list  This edition of the Editing newsletter includes information the Wikipedia:Talk pages project, an effort to help contributors communicate on wiki more easily. The central project page is on MediaWiki.org.
|
This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
_crop.jpg)
Hashtag to use for June 2020 BLM article improvement drive?
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi Another Believer, I'm writing to ask if there is a hashtag that I should use, for edits I make as part of the June 2020 Black Lives Matter article improvement drive, described at this page [2] I lead a small wiki-editing group, and this Friday we are going to focus our edits on this project. Wondering if I should ask group members to include a hashtag in their edits? Thank you, Wikipersistence (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Statue of Sam Davis
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Statue of Sam Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WashuOtaku (talk) 14:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Order! Order in the Court!
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Heya AB :-) I got 75 more of these. You think the FAQ should go under the talk header for all of them? I was thinking the FAQ is more important than what's in the talk header, and putting it at the top of the page would increase the chances it'd be seen by editors and not just glossed over or scrolled past. I don't really have a strong opinion, I just don't want to do 75 of these and have you move it 75 times; I'm happy to rearrange the order before I continue if you think that's best. Levivich [dubious – discuss] 22:07, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Found: Geo coordinates for all the Confederate monuments
For your stub making project... this good docs has all the coords. Check out the second worksheet ("Whose Heritage Master"). You can sort by column F (State) if that helps. Coords are in column H. This is a document from the Southern Poverty Law Center, from this page or this page. Normal Op (talk) 04:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia
Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.
Can I remind you of the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.S Philbrick(Talk) 14:44, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Monument Stubs
I noticed you created several new stubs on monuments that were recently removed during recent events, none of which have actual information about the monuments. Is their a plan to go back and expand on them or is it just same issue as Sam Davis? --WashuOtaku (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Washuotaku, I do hope to revisit, and I've seen several of the recent stubs I've created for notable monuments expanded by others. I write about public art and sculpture often, and I'm confident these subjects are independently notable. There's nothing wrong with stubs, they just need expanding! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:02, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1
The article Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Now That's What I Call Drag Music, Vol. 1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bilorv -- Bilorv (talk) 13:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
The Signpost: 28 June 2020
- News and notes: Progress at Wikipedia Library and Wikijournal of Medicine
- Community view: Community open letter on renaming
- Gallery: After the killing of George Floyd
- In the media: Part collaboration and part combat
- Discussion report: Community reacts to WMF rebranding proposals
- Featured content: Sports are returning, with a rainbow
- Arbitration report: Anti-harassment RfC and a checkuser revocation
- Traffic report: The pandemic, alleged murder, a massacre, and other deaths
- News from the WMF: We stand for racial justice
- Recent research: Wikipedia and COVID-19; automated Wikipedia-based fact-checking
- Humour: Cherchez une femme
- On the bright side: For what are you grateful this month?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Black Lives Matter
Nomination of Statue of Christopher Columbus (New London, Connecticut) for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Christopher Columbus (New London, Connecticut) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 27, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
_-_Apelles_painting_Campaspe_-_2.jpg)
Statues
Hello! I just did ReFill on the New Haven statue, and it might have messed up some of your edits. Please do check. I'm goign to stop working on these for the moment. I don't think that this AfD will gain any traction. If I can find 8 sources in Google, there are twenty at the library. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:38, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- ThatMontrealIP, Exactly! And I've checked, all good. Thanks again! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- PS: I did not know until now that you were "notorious". That's a compliment in my books.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- I'd like to apologize again for that - it was definitely out of line. Both of you are skilled editors who put a lot of work in on the statue articles; after further reflection, I have withdrawn the AfD. Hopefully our future interactions will be more positive so that you can consider me a useful collaborator and not just a deletionist jerk.
- PS: I did not know until now that you were "notorious". That's a compliment in my books.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- With that said, what I came here for was to let you know that I've used one of your images as the infobox image for Longfellow Bridge. Sometimes, Commons happens to lack a particularly good overview image for a popular subject for quite a long period. That was the case with the Longfellow Bridge until your upload. Regards, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: Thanks, I really appreciate your note. Based on previous interactions with you re: Boston-related content, I know you're a great editor working in good faith. All good! Thanks again. :) ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- With that said, what I came here for was to let you know that I've used one of your images as the infobox image for Longfellow Bridge. Sometimes, Commons happens to lack a particularly good overview image for a popular subject for quite a long period. That was the case with the Longfellow Bridge until your upload. Regards, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:39, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
@Pi.1415926535: Also, I saw your request to add coordinates to the Boston stubs. I'm not really good at adding coordinates to articles, if I'm being honest, which is why I add the tags hoping someone else will add them for me. I've tried to learn how to add them more than once, but I just don't enjoy the process. If you or another editor are good at adding coordinates, I'd actually ask for assistance. I watchlist most of the Boston stubs needing coords, and I'd happily follow to update infoboxes, add maps, etc. Not a hard ask, if you're not interested, just wanted to explain why I don't tackle the coordinates myself. ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:26, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sure, and feel free to ask me (pinging me in an edit summary is fine) if you have other coord requests! I generally empty out the CT category every few weeks, and I'm slowly working through the Boston/MA categories as well, so I'll get to them. If there are instances where you don't mind adding coords yourself, I highly recommend this site created by an editor. For my uploads, I find it only adds a few seconds per photo to move the marker and copy-paste the coords. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:06, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: I don't think I'd have any requests outside Category:Boston articles missing geocoordinate data. I've already followed your recent edits by adding maps to infoboxes, so thanks for your help on those! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:09, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Portland Gear logo.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
 Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Blue Star Donuts logo.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC) |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2020
Extended content
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).
|
Cancel culture
This term redirects to Online shaming but George Will used it to refer to the erasing of history (at least I think I'm interpreting it right). You seem to have a particular interest in that so I was hoping you'd know about an article about the general topic.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
WMF Code of Conduct
Hello Jason; my name is Mervat and I am contacting you seeking help to reach out to the members of the Cascadia Wikimedians User Group, I chose to write to you as you are the secretary of the group. The idea is that we are trying to reach out to the members of different affiliates to discuss the objectives and people's expectations and concerns about the universal code of conduct that the Wikimedia Foundation Board voted recently for creating it for all Wikimedia projects. I want to invite your community to be part of the consultation process. I will send a survey in which members can express their thoughts and concerns, and I am willing to conduct meetings if anyone would like to discuss verbally. So for now, I am seeking your advice on what's the best way to contact members? shall I deliver a message in the group's page in meta? can we use a mailing list (I prefer that because almost everyone will receive the message), or shall I contact the user names listed in the group's page individually? I appreciate your kind help. --Mervat (WMF) (talk) 11:50, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mervat (WMF), Hi Mervat, I'm not actually the current secretary, but no worries! I think your best bet is to post a note on the group's Meta talk page: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cascadia_Wikimedians. @Bri and Peaceray: Putting this on your radar as well. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer:, this is helpful. Thank you. --Mervat (WMF) (talk) 16:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 July newsletter
Extended content
|
|---|
|
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 2 July 2020 (UTC) |
Too many non-notable statues
You've made a lot of articles about statues that mostly people didn't care about except to tear them down— at least, that's what the article say. To me that suggests they belong merged back to the people the memorialize, because that's what it's really all about. From what I can see most of these articles simply are padded versions of the material in the main article anyway. Mangoe (talk) 01:59, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mangoe, Thanks for leaving a note here. I've discussed this recently (see example). Editors (myself included) are creating many new articles about monuments and memorials in the news lately. We know they are stubs but we're struggling just to keep up with all the incoming information. In all honestly, most of these monuments should be independently notable. For most you can find information about funding, design, dedication, history over time, removal, reception, etc., this is is sufficient for a Wikipedia article. I've written at least a couple dozen Good articles about public artworks. I wouldn't be creating these stubs if I felt there wasn't good reason. I ask you to please refrain from redirecting/merging and give editors time to expand these properly, which often requires digging into local newspaper archives, books, etc. Thank you. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- (sigh) @ThatMontrealIP: You might want to take a look at Statue of Williams Carter Wickham as well. Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Some of them perhaps are, and when they are shown to be (because they are expanded with sourcing that shows people in general cared about them besides just getting rid of them) I do not object to having them as separate articles. I don't doubt that information can be found about a lot of them, but the mere existence of information doesn't make a thing notable; it's a very safe bet that few of these have note as artworks or even as tourist attractions. Right now, the state of the articles I merged says that they are not independently notable, and it seems to me they should be left merged for now.
- (sigh) @ThatMontrealIP: You might want to take a look at Statue of Williams Carter Wickham as well. Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:12, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have nominated a representative for discussion: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Williams Carter Wickham. We can discuss this further there. Mangoe (talk) 02:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mangoe, Yeah, thanks I'll drop what I'm doing to rescue another article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: that postcard find was a nice add! Just goes to show how much print-era coverage is out there. I think this article is safe, and we edit conflicted a few times, so I am going back to my previous work subject!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- ThatMontrealIP, I've moved on as well, if you want to revisit sooner or later. Thanks so much for your help! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Another Believer: that postcard find was a nice add! Just goes to show how much print-era coverage is out there. I think this article is safe, and we edit conflicted a few times, so I am going back to my previous work subject!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 02:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mangoe, Yeah, thanks I'll drop what I'm doing to rescue another article. ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:23, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- I have nominated a representative for discussion: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Statue of Williams Carter Wickham. We can discuss this further there. Mangoe (talk) 02:21, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Editing news 2020 #3
Extended content
|
|---|
 Seven years ago this week, the Editing team made the visual editor available by default to all logged-in editors using the desktop site at the English Wikipedia. Here's what happened since its introduction:
|
Grammy question
Hi Another Believer! I saw you were listed on the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Awards/Grammy_Awards_task_force page. I wasn't sure if the talk page of the project was very active, so I was wondering if you could answer a question I had. I know that Song of the Year technically is awarded to the songwriters so it would make sense for those awards to appear on the songwriters page as well as the original artist. Do you think it's appropriate to also list other awards on the songwriters page? For example, let's say I help write a song on an album. The album gets nominated for Album of the Year. Should I also have Album of the Year on my own page even though I only helped write one song on the album? This would also go for music producers. I am just wondering what your thoughts are, because I can't find a definitive rule on any of the pages. Thank you! --Divine618 (talk) 16:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Divine618, I think awards should only be mentioned if the individual is specifically credited, not because they are affiliated with a project that won an award. I hope I'm understanding your questions correctly and my response is helpful. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Question
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Do you think Honey Davenport has a shot at becoming a featured article? I've never gone through the FAC process before, but my own understanding of the FA criteria doesn't give me reason to believe there are any areas in which the article clearly falls short. I've done my best to keep it updated, and the prose has been expanded by about 25% since the article was promoted to GA. Thought to ask your opinion since you probably have a better sense for this. Thanks, Armadillopteryxtalk 05:34, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 28, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Orphaned non-free image File:Brickell Memorial, Columbus, Ohio, 2018.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC) |
Dead links checker
This will not run on List of monuments and memorials removed during the George Floyd protests with the error that it is too large. I tried unsuccessfully to submit a job request. Would you take care of this? deisenbe (talk) 13:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- Deisenbe, I just tried. Nothing happened, so I assume I'm encountering the same problem. Looks like some manual reference formatting may be needed. The tool is super helpful most of the time, but perhaps not this time. ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:23, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
A goat for you!
For your amazing work at creating countless items of public art. Regards
Asqueladd (talk) 09:11, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- Asqueladd, Thank you! I wish I had time to expand them all, but sometimes all I can do is get the ball rolling. Happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 13:42, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2020
Extended content
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Nomination of Divas Lip Sync Live for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divas Lip Sync Live until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 29, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
Your draft article, Draft:Mary Jane Holland (song)
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hello, Another Believer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Jane Holland". In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
|
Orphaned non-free image File:10 Great Songs, Pat Benatar.jpg
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 15 July 2020 (UTC) |
Drag Race terminology
What, no "oppalence"? (*grin*) Bearcat (talk) 01:38, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- Bearcat, Hah, yesss! ---Another Believer (Talk) 02:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of 2020 Trump Tulsa rally for deletion
ResolvedExtended content
|
|---|
|
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 Trump Tulsa rally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GoingBatty (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
|
This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
A barnstar for you!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| For your ardent and fearless work documenting the ongoing protests in Portland, Oregon. They are a record of history in these tumultuous, perhaps revolutionary, times. Ocaasi t | c 22:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC) |
- @Ocaasi: Hey, thanks, Jake! These gestures go a long way during times like these. Hope you're doing well! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:11, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
Statue of Fan Zhongyan
Hi, I'm thinking that your article Statue of Fan Zhongyan could be merged to Fan Zhongyan, but wanted to check with you first. --Alan Islas (talk) 18:51, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Alan Islas, I was hoping someone would share some Chinese-language sourcing specific to the monument. Worth asking at WikiProject China? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- Another Believer, good point, there should be some more sources in Chinese. I participate with that project, but I will ask for the help of somebody who can actually read the language!
- A few years ago I visited Fan Zhongyan's tomb site in Yichuan province Henan. It looked like a notable historical and touristic site on its own, worthy of an article, but I can't find anything in English, so I just put the photo I took in the main article. I'll mention both places in the project's talk page. No rush to merge, we can see if there is a response, even if it takes a while. Regards, --Alan Islas (talk) 13:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Spoopy
Extended content
|
|---|
|
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Spoopy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. The article Spoopy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold The article Spoopy you nominated as a good article has passed |
August 2020 at Women in Red
Extended content
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2020)
Extended content
| |
|---|---|
|
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Another Believer
Thank you for creating Levitating (song).
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 11:43, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:51, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Draft:This Is What I Live For
I moved your draft into mainspace. You're a pagemover, is there a reason you didn't move it yourself? --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- Ahecht, I can't recall the exact message I see when trying to move drafts into the main space over existing redirects, but I'm often unable to do so. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:20, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- If you install pageswap.js it will add a link to that error message to swap the draft and the redirect page. You can also do what I did in this case and move the redirect to a new location, making sure to uncheck the box that says "Leave a redirect behind", and then moving the draft to where the redirect used to be. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:46, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
- If you install pageswap.js it will add a link to that error message to swap the draft and the redirect page. You can also do what I did in this case and move the redirect to a new location, making sure to uncheck the box that says "Leave a redirect behind", and then moving the draft to where the redirect used to be. --Ahecht (TALK
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Another Believer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |