Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
- 2001:f77:6c20:4100:8154:d90:80eb:fd2c (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1328 (LTA 1328, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:03, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hello1127 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:1700:a282:e200:f5e9:88b9:9ea4:8aa0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 06:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 176.28.133.85 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Abu Khalil Qabbani was changed by 176.28.133.85 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859292 on 2025-01-24T07:51:53+00:00 (Automated) ClueBot NG (talk) 07:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
- Randolph02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Electrical engineering (diff): account is being used only for promotional purposes. Repeated insertion of links to electricityforum.com. Constant314 (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 2600:100B:B022:33D8:F919:A6CC:A9D9:83FA (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Mona the Vampire (book) (diff): vandalism after final warning. The range is bigger than /64 (see the article history) but it needs to be stopped from persistent hoaxing. Binksternet (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 49.106.202.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Mōryō no Hako: vandalism after final warning. Block evasion: 49.104.7.72 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Also vandalized 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. WP:NOTHERE. Areaseven (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- From edit summaries it is evident that the following are the same person WP:NOTHERE. I left warnings on one talk page, but obviously in vain:
- 2404:8000:1095:742A:619D:D3F3:7F60:ABB1 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 2404:8000:1095:742A:5464:741:E9CA:21F7 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- 2404:8000:1095:742A:A069:9EA0:FAF:145A (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
- I guess, a rangeblock is due. I looked into the range and I see,eg. Martin (name) was abused unnoticed for quite some time. And some other names were vandalized multiple times as well. --Altenmann >talk 05:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 190.200.8.49 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - May not be meant as vandalism, but IP keeps inserting 'false' dates in American political articles. GoodDay (talk) 06:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 172.99.34.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - Clearly just vandalizing articles, every single edit he's made has been reverted and it's all just random nonsense, not even trying to be constructive. Has already been blocked before, and came right back to vandalizing a month later. 88TylerDurden (talk) 06:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 1000leaguess (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Possible sock of Hairygorillaballs (see their user page). ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- 101.128.125.83 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Consistently removing sourced information and images from dozens of articles on football players. Iiii I I I (talk) 07:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Watusi9322 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Jetstar (diff): vandalism after final warning; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Seercat3160 (talk) 07:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Anerka ve 2006 yılında açtığı Vikipedi hesabı (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- TCG - THE CLUB GYM (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Super silly guy with a silly billy other guy too (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- The Taylor Film Productions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Fjzbazgfxbx (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: fu*c+k. Violating string: fjzbazgfcksbcks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- UsernameIsAwesome (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- II NOOB II (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Patrick-Collett-MAINE.EDU (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Builtdifferentgoat (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Clubkade (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Vattutroll (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, so please be careful when blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- This username matched "troll" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Note on file The word troll may imply an intent to disrupt Wikipedia - but that is not certain. Please use discretion to determine if this is a violation or not. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Adhi college (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Maarshiil (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Spam edits (e.g., here) and promotional edit summaries about company of the same name. Felida97 (talk) 09:06, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've revdel'd the two edits with comment spam, and issued final warning. Their move, next. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @DoubleGrazing: Thanks! Isn't it still a username violation though (since the user name is the same as the name of the company they promoted/spammed)? Felida97 (talk) 18:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I've revdel'd the two edits with comment spam, and issued final warning. Their move, next. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Jbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjbjb (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wiki is now Xpedia by X corp (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Created amongst a few other improper names. So CU should help. —Teles «Talk to me˱M @ C S˲» 15:29, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Heil the Wokemedia Foundation (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. Aspening (talk) 17:23, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- WikiEditorHub (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:07, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. It does imply they are a group, but it is unclear exactly what the group is or if it even exists, so I went with the discussion option. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 21:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Atura Power (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:13, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Aliumhealth (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. They seem like the typical "I totally misunderstand what WP is" new user as opposed to a malicious spammer, and they didn't touch any article content. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox: They did, however, create a draft that is quite blatant advertising, but I will respect your judgement. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TornadoLGS: I'm glad you mentioned that as I had meant to delete the draft, but got distracted by lunch. Some of us are trying a different approach, trying to notify users of these issues instead of no-warning blocks, provided they have not posted promotional content in actual articles. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 23:01, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Beeblebrox: They did, however, create a draft that is quite blatant advertising, but I will respect your judgement. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. They seem like the typical "I totally misunderstand what WP is" new user as opposed to a malicious spammer, and they didn't touch any article content. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 22:36, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Theinkpost (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading and promotional username. See Draft:The Ink Post. SK2242 (talk) 00:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. As they have not posted promotional content in article space. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 02:47, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- The Taylor Film Productions (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Clearly promotional of https://taylorfilm.com. Cabrils (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. Since their only edit was to put their username on their userpage. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 02:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Official-BCTC (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Cabrils (talk) 01:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Being discussed with the user. I probably would have blocked this one as they edited in article space, but another use chose discussion. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 02:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- F. Scott Fitzgerald, Esq (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. impersonation T.R.S Talk | My Contribs 02:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Not a blatant violation of the username policy. We block people for impersonating living people. Fitzgerald died eighty-four years ago. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 02:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- ASPECT Studios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Wavyworldrecords (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See also draft. TornadoLGS (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Indya Story (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). One of their edits explains a company, and their username represents that company. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Perkinsperkinslaw (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). Adding links that contain username. [1] ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 06:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- BMCcorpcomms (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). Appears to represent Brunei Methanol Company. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:10, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Adhi college (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username (look at their contributions page). Appears to represent Adhi College of Engineering and Technology. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 07:14, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: This movie is based on historical novel, I want to protect page to prevent incorrect information. Kiranpawar3210 (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Question: We don't preemptively protect pages. Is there disruption now? What type and by what users? — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:21, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 10:43, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 10:48, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. When few if any of them seem to be reverted, it's hard to see that there's a problem. Daniel Case (talk) 03:31, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism and current controversial topic Mechanical Keyboarder (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Not seeing it yet. I will add a CTOPS notice to the talk page. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite extended protection: Arbitration Enforcement. WP:ARBPIA 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) talk/edits 00:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Yes, relevant to the topic but hardly a nexus to the current conflict. Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Seraphimblade. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IPs repeatitly vandalizing the article GoodDay (talk) 04:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Recent repeated disruptive editing Cabrils (talk) 04:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Warn the user appropriately then report them to AIV or ANI if they continue. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent misgendering and vandalism of a trans BLP. Requesting as a WP:GENSEX enforcement action. Funcrunch (talk) 05:06, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IPs vandalizing article GoodDay (talk) 05:11, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:51, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: There was an involved protection request here that failed to mention that several of the users edit warring are extended confirmed. Requesting full protection until the RfC concludes. BMWF (talk) 05:22, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined Given that all of the extended-confirmed users are in favor of the current version while I wouldn't have done that protection this way if I were the responding admin the effect of increasing it to full would be to deny others the ability to edit while not obviously helping anything. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:53, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Indefinite full move-protection: Contentious topic restriction. Should be full-move protected per Netanyahu and Israel articles. 🗽Freedoxm🗽(talk • contribs) 05:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:54, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Wburrow (talk) 05:52, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:55, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from a block evading IP range and sockpuppets, blocks seem to have no effect PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Nixovel (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:56, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content. Donnowin1 (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- List of people granted executive clemency by Donald Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. FactsheetPete (talk) 07:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: I am writing to respectfully request the removal of the edit protection on the "Foundational Black Americans" page. I believe that the current state of the page does not accurately represent the term and may inadvertently mislead readers.
Issue at Hand:
When searching for "Foundational Black Americans," the page redirects to an individual, which does not provide a definition or proper context of the term. This is concerning because:
Misrepresentation: "Foundational Black Americans" refers to a lineage of Black Americans whose ancestors were enslaved in the United States and have developed a distinct cultural heritage over generations. It is not a term beholden to any single person or leader.
Ethnogenesis and Cultural Significance: Black Americans have undergone a unique process of ethnogenesis, evolving from labels such as "Negro" and "Colored" to "African American," and now embracing "Foundational Black Americans" to acknowledge their specific historical and cultural identity.
Potential Misinformation: Redirecting to an individual's page may contribute to misinformation and does not align with Wikipedia's commitment to providing neutral and accurate information.
Request:
I kindly request that the edit protection be lifted to allow for collaborative efforts in:
Creating a Dedicated Page: Developing a comprehensive article that defines "Foundational Black Americans" as a lineage, supported by reliable sources.
Ensuring Accuracy and Neutrality: Providing readers with accurate information that reflects the collective heritage and contributions of Foundational Black Americans without unintended bias.
Commitment to Wikipedia's Standards:
I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines on neutrality, verifiability, and reliable sourcing. My intention is to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia and enhance the quality of information available to the public.
Conclusion:
Thank you for considering my request. I believe that updating the page to accurately reflect the term will greatly benefit those seeking information on this important aspect of American history and culture.
I look forward to your response and the opportunity to contribute to this article. 2601:983:4600:7230:8D69:264C:225A:3C55 (talk) 23:57, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- We do not entertain requests made via chatbot. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:36, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined per above. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason: I would like to request the unprotection of the Gangwar surname Wikipedia page. Currently, the page is semi-protected, which limits editing to more experienced editors, but this has hindered efforts to improve the page. The page lacks crucial information about the Gangwar clan and its historical background, including details from Vedic texts and other historical references.
As the Gangwar clan's history is deeply rooted in Vedic literature and other historical texts, it requires the expertise of scholars who are familiar with these sources to update the page. Normal editors may not fully grasp the significance of these references, and the semi-protection of the page could delay the process of incorporating the necessary academic and historical context.
It is important to include information about the Gangwar clan's regional distributions, its connections to other communities, and its role in historical events to improve the page’s accuracy and quality. Additionally, updating the page with proper citations and references from respected sources will greatly enhance the credibility of the article.
I respectfully request that the page be unprotected so that scholars and experts can contribute to the article and provide a more comprehensive and accurate account of the Gangwar surname and its historical context.
Thank you for your time and consideration. 4rju9 (talk) 04:20, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- @4rju9: We do not entertain requests made via chatbot. Discuss it with Daniel Case, who protected it under the auspices of WP:GS/CASTE. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Daniel Case The page was semi-protected due to edit wars, which are no longer an issue. It needs updating to include historical information about the Gangwar clan, referenced in Vedic texts and historical sources. The page currently lacks information about the Gangwar clan, including historical context, regional distribution, and connections to other communities. Unprotection will allow me and the other scholars to contribute citations and improve the article’s quality and credibility.
- if possible, i would appreciate temporary unprotection or the opportunity to work collaboratively to improve the page.
4rju9 (talk) 07:33, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined
The page was semi-protected due to edit wars
- no, it wasn't, it was extended-confirmed protected instead.which are no longer an issue
- which means the protection is working. If you have a request for an edit to be made, use {{edit extended-protected}} on the talk page. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:48, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Possible vandal bot attack. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 06:01, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 06:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Already protected by administrator Bilby. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Change test runs scored from 1766 to 1798 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Change test Batting average from 55.18 to 52.88 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Change FC batting average from 64.03 to 62.40 Jaiswalgaurav012002 (talk) 07:40, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Declined This page is not protected. You can edit it yourself. * Pppery * it has begun... 07:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
4 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 06:34, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
14 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated as needed. Last updated: 02:38, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
WP:PERM
Requests for autopatrolled |
---|
Autopatrolled
I've seen this editor's work on multiple occasions at New Page Review. Has created 208 pages, none deleted, more than 3/4 of them B-class. High-quality page creation with infoboxes, quality references with proper formatting, images, etc., requiring no cleanup by reviewers. Dclemens1971 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request auto-patrolled rights on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the project and have created more than 30 of articles to date, which adhere to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I believe my experience and attention to detail make me a good fit for this role. Granting me auto-patrolled rights would help reduce the workload on other patrollers by automatically marking my new pages as reviewed. Please feel free to review my contributions and articles to ensure they meet the necessary standards. Let me know if any additional information is required. Thank you for considering my request! Needforname (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Ahola .O (talk) 22:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) I am requesting the autopatrolled user right because I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia and believe that my experience and adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines make me a suitable candidate for this right, I have created over 25 articles, all of which comply with Wikipedia's notability guidelines and content policies. My contributions have consistently aimed to enhance the quality and reliability of the encyclopedia. I believe that granting me the autopatrolled user right will help reduce the workload of new page patrollers and allow me to continue contributing to Wikipedia more efficiently. Thank you for considering my request. Ahola .O (talk)
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights I have created almost 50 articles and whilst producing these articles I have developed my understanding of wikipedia policies, conformed with the rules for biographies of living persons and have improved the content and formatting of numerous articles. SDGB1217 (talk) 14:46, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I have created 75+ articles, since I got autopatrolled mostly focusing on television series. For transparency, I'm still working on the feedback received from @Schwede66 in my last request. And I intent to keep doing the good work. Thanks for your consideration. Wishing the community a prosperous new year. C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:56, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Concise, well-written and sufficiently articles, mostly with a royal or Church of England focus. I looked at an articles of theirs as part of NPP, and found it to be up to standard without editing. Others look reasonable too. Klbrain (talk) 12:15, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting Autopatrolled rights for my account. I have contributed a significant number of edits, and my contributions are well-sourced and meet notability standards. I believe this rights would help my workflow and reduce the load on reviewers. 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 12:56, 23 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
---|
AutoWikiBrowser |
Requests for confirmation |
---|
Confirmed
I would like this right to be granted to my alternative accounts, TheTechie-alt and TheTechie-mobile, as I am far past autoconfirmed on my main account. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for extended confirmation |
---|
Extended confirmed
I would like this right to be granted to my alternative accounts, TheTechie-alt and TheTechie-mobile, as I am far past extended confirmed on my main account. If you reply here, please ping me. Thanks, TheTechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 22:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for new page reviewer |
---|
New page reviewer
I am editing Wikipedia since 10 months and i had created dozens of articles and also participated in deletion discussions and also nominated some articles for AfD and most of them got deleted. Also i exapanded some articles of stub category and my area of interest are Politics, Rajasthan, BLPs, settlement articles, etc. Now i want to work with other editors on New page reviewing and i am requesting for a one month rights, firstly as a trial. TheSlumPanda (talk) 08:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hey, I would like to apply for the NPR rights. As I have created more than 50 pages and I'm actively involved in reviewing drafts since last week of December 2024, you can check my reviewed articles here and the articles I putted up for deletion can be seen here. My primary focus are the articles related to Women, Politics, India, Poetry, Writers and Indian activists. I do sometime revert bad faith edits. I will contribute to the Wikipedia with NPR rights, same as I have contributed through the AFC Reviewer rights. Thanks and Regards. Taabii (talk) 12:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I am requesting this permission as I would be interested to help at the near-permanent New Pages Feed backlog, when my other work here allows me to do so. I am aware of the relevant content policies and guidelines, especially when it comes to NPOV and BLP. If granted, I intend to use it responsibly, like I do with my other permissions. As for my own record, I have created over 600 articles so far, with few deleted. I already have autopatrolled and rollback permissions. As for my experience, I have been around for almost 15 years, with c. 150,000 edits. — Sundostund mppria (talk / contribs) 13:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I am requesting NPR rights to help maintain the quality of new pages and ensure Wikipedia’s standards. I will handle this role responsibly. I understand Wikipedia’s notability, verifiability, and content policies like WP:NPOV and reliable sourcing. I’m also aware of the need to prevent spam, promotional content, and poorly sourced articles. |
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag. |
---|
Page mover |
Requests for pending changes reviewer |
---|
Pending changes reviewer
I have lots of experience in the WP:TW scale of reverting edits, and wish to continue this through WP:PENDING BryceM2001 (talk) 20:40, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
I'd like to request pending changes review rights because I am familiar with the policy and this would help me with my vandalism patrols. Furthermore, I am currently trying to accept a request, but I do not have the permissions. Thanks! Ali Beary (talk2me!) (stalk me?!) 13:29, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
My sole purpose of editing or the desire to review edits is for the wellbeing of Wikipedia. I made a few pages and made 1300+ edits. I believe in quality not quantity. TrueMoriarty (talk) 17:36, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
Requesting pending changes reviewer rights to assist in recent changes patrol, am very active on the English Wikipedia and have good knowledge of Vandalism policy and other basic content policies. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 21:25, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
To review changes on Martin Luther King Jr. Day. — W.andrea (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Requests for rollback |
---|
Rollback
Hello, I was temporarily granted rollback permissions to see how I do, and they are due to expire on the 27th. I believe I have been diligent and careful with this permission, and I only use it when necessary. I always warn users and I create discussions on article talk pages where necessary. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
I’m requesting rollback tool to help with vandalism fighting more effectively. I’ve been active in counter-vandalism work and have a good understanding of policies like WP:VAND and WP:AGF. While I’ve made mistakes in the past, I’ve taken the feedback onboard, slowed down, and focused on making more accurate judgements. Rollback would allow me to handle clear vandalism more efficiently without cluttering edit histories. I’m committed to using it responsibly and only for obvious cases of vandalism, leaving more complex issues for discussion or reporting. Thank you for considering my request. Footballnerd2007 • talk ⚽ 17:27, 21 January 2025 (UTC) |
Requests for template editor |
---|
Template editor
I am requesting permission to access the template editor. I intend to modify Template:Infobox sports rivalry to add a field for the most points scored in a game within the Infobox. I believe this addition would be beneficial for NFL rivalry pages, as it would highlight the highest-scoring game between the teams. If I am unable to obtain permission, I would appreciate it if someone else could assist with this modification. WikiGiancarloC2 (talk) 23:24, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
|
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |