Jump to content

User talk:SilverLocust

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This editor is a Veteran Editor IV and is entitled to display the Veteran Editor IV Ribbon.
Brilliant Idea Barnstar from ToBeFree
Bubble Tea from Whpq
baklava from Cremastra
Brilliant Idea Barnstar from ToBeFree
Technical Barnstar from ToBeFree
Scholarly Barnstar from Hydrangeans
Tireless Contributor Barnstar from Jannatulbaqi
Did you know ... that the 2024 U.S. Supreme Court case Department of State v. Muñoz decided that the fundamental right to marry does not give a U.S. citizen a right to challenge their spouse's visa denial? On the main page on 24 July 2024
Did you know ... that because the lord chancellor of England did not freeze assets before trial in 1789, the U.S. Supreme Court decided in 1999 that U.S. courts cannot either? On the main page on 25 October 2024
This user helped "Lisa Blatt" become a good article.
This user is an Arbitration clerk (trainee) on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome to my talk page!

Alternatively, you can ping me on a discussion page by including {{Replyto|SilverLocust}} in a comment or contact me by email or on Discord.


ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-47

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On my first (non-WP:ROUNDROBIN) redirect suppression

[edit]

I'm the person you granted temporary page mover rights yesterday, and I wanted to ask if this move, where "Viceskeeni2" was the username of the page author, was a correct application of that criterion. JJPMaster (she/they) 02:48, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@JJPMaster: The way I understand that criterion (WP:PMRC#3/{{db-error}}/the second bulletpoint of WP:G6) is that the redirect can be deleted/suppressed if the user who selected the title Draft:Viceskeeni2/Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) obviously didn't mean to select that title. (For example, if they moved the page to Draft:Viceskeeni2/Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) and then followed that with a move to Draft:Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf), then I'd be confident they hadn't intended the first move.) I'm not confident that this move was unintentional (that is, I'm not confident that they actually intended to move it to Draft:Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf)), so I'd just move it normally without suppressing the redirect.
I can only speak for myself on that, and I wouldn't say it's unreasonable to conclude that the criterion applied.
Either way, redirects are WP:CHEAP, and redirects in draftspace are particularly harmless (perhaps with some exceptions), so it would be fine here to just leave a redirect.
When you do suppress a redirect (other than in a round-robin swap), you should check for incoming links. (From the granting message: "Please remember to [...] make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere.") In this instance, User:Viceskeeni2/Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) was a redirect to Draft:Viceskeeni2/Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) but broke after the draft was moved without leaving a redirect. So the broken redirect was deleted per WP:G8 (incorrectly, since G8 notes that "Redirects that were broken as a result of a page move or retargeting [...] should instead be retargeted to their target's new name"). Also, by moving the draft without leaving a redirect, it redlinked the link at the creator's userpage, User:Viceskeeni2. SilverLocust 💬 07:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the reason I suppressed that redirect was because I thought that the continued inclusion of the username and forward slash indicated that they accidentally forgot to delete the part of the title that made it clear the page was in userspace (inspired by this move I took before being granted page mover access). However, my use of {{db-error}} might have made it a bit unclear—I think that what is more clear than that Draft:Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) was intended was that Draft:Viceskeeni2/Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) was not intended. I was also considering moving the page back to User:Viceskeeni2/Selimiye Mosque (Deggendorf) over redirect, but decided that that was unlikely to be the intended title, since it had just been moved therefrom. JJPMaster (she/they) 16:24, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, SilverLocust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Equity power of United States courts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-48

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move MediaWiki:Tag-Nuke to MediaWiki:Tag-nuke

[edit]

As the "nuke" tag is now called "nuke" instead of "Nuke" following phab:T379168, you should move MediaWiki:Tag-Nuke to MediaWiki:Tag-nuke (without leaving a redirect behind). GTrang (talk) 23:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. There wasn't actually an option to leave behind a redirect (as with an MMS list). SilverLocust 💬 23:48, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you SilverLocust for your contributions. Baqi:) (talk) 10:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jannatulbaqi: Thank you, though I'd rephrase that as the "tired contributor" barnstar. I've been a tad bit busy in real life recently. SilverLocust 💬 08:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for acting as closer in this discussion. Note that Category:Hip hop, several articles within, and related subcategories, will need to be moved to be consistent with the hyphenated spelling. 162 etc. (talk) 08:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

your Editnotices help

[edit]

Again thanks for trying to help, but just as a future heads-up, even though I consider myself fairly conversant in technology, I don't have the faintest clue why I would be helped by you offering me to start up draft articles, nor why I am benefited from your choice of two. They are (as far as I can see) completely blank: the boilerplate code claims there are drafts but there's nothing there. Furthermore when I expand each thing, I'm greeted with more boilerplate for "You are editing Wikipedia right now!" and obviously false claims these drafts are " today's featured article." The boilerplate goes on and on, for a reason that completely escapes me.

I'm not writing this to ask you what all of this means; I have abandoned my hope my request will get implemented in the short-term. Instead I am humbly asking that you reconsider before trying to help another editor the same way. Bluntly speaking, your "help" is likely just as incomprehensible to them as it is to me. Maybe add a short explanatory note so the editor understands what you are offering, or something. I genuinely don't know what's missing other than you gave me something I have zero clue how to use, and I'm thinking of the next editor you want to help.

Anyway, have a nice day, and again, I am not expecting or asking for any response on your part. Thank you for wanting to help out, even if I am clearly not competent enough to appreciate it. Regards, CapnZapp (talk) 10:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CapnZapp: I've already added links per your request. You made an edit request to Template:Editnotices/Namespace/Main. The five notices that are included in that template are {{Draft at}}, {{TFA editnotice}}, {{Refideas editnotice}}, {{BLP editnotice}}, and {{Disambig editnotice}}. The examples I showed were of what those five notices would look like with links. SilverLocust 💬 11:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-49

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2024).

Administrator changes

added
readded
removed

Interface administrator changes

added
readded Pppery

CheckUser changes

readded

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Tech News: 2024-50

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:13, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

Hi, SilverLocust! Thank you for taking your time to add the pages I protected to WP:AELOG/2024! I didn't realize these had to be logged, but I'll make sure to do this moving forward. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 13:14, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AC/M formatting

[edit]

Is there a reason you went with raw html (ending the div early, font, etc.) rather than '''{{big|{{xtn|Arbitrators-elect (taking office 1 January 2025)}}}}''' as has been done in the past? I ask because the page has to be parsed by AmoryBot for the user highlighting pages. If there's gonna be a new format, nbd, I can update the bot script, but otherwise it tries to be strict. ~ Amory (utc) 11:51, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Amorymeltzer: That was just what was used in the example diff from 2014 that was linked on the clerk procedures page (which I'll update to a current example). Though I should have noticed that the html tags were mismatched. I've fixed my edit per your suggestion; please change it further if it's still wrong. SilverLocust 💬 12:08, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect! ~ Amory (utc) 12:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for all the work that you do! Regards, Aafi (talk) 07:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Figure Skating/A-Class review/preload has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:56, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked

[edit]

file:FHM1.jpg: Based on the uploader's edits, their other uploads, and the filename, I concluded that the image was most likely taken from an issue of FHM magazine: in other words, that "{{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}}" was blatantly false. That the license was bad. I observed that the image was not in use, and there was therefore no point in devising an FUR. Lastly, I noted that the uploader was last active in 2007, and was thus unlikely to respond to a request for further details.

File:LakeWade.JPG: This image was uploaded in 2008, to illustrate an article about a high school sports team that was speedy'd two days after creation. It's some kids standing on a sports field, taken from a weird angle. In the background you can see some adults, and some other kids sitting on a bench. Also there are trees. I transfer a lot of images to Commons. I assessed that this one would not be considered within scope on Commons, and that if it were imported to Commons, it would eventually be deleted from there as well, pursuant to a formal deletion request.

File:Muralb.jpg: "Photo of a mural in Illinois, where freedom of panorama does not apply to murals." Because the person who uploaded the image of the mural did so in order to add it to an article about a neighborhood in Chicago, which is in Illinois, I reasonably inferred that the mural was in Illinois. This means that it is subject to American law. Do you understand "freedom of panorama"? Barring significant changes to American law, this photo of a 2-dimensional artwork on public display in the United States was not, and could not be, properly licensed (unless any one of a variety of highly specific conditions, such as "the mural first went on display prior to 1 January 1929", or "the muralist died over 70 years ago", is true; however, as no provenance was supplied for the mural, we must assume that none of those conditions are true and that therefore, barring more information, the mural is still under copyright). As the photo is a derivative work of a nonfree artwork, it could only remain on enwiki with a proper Fair Use Rationale. Its purpose in the article from which I removed it was "being part of a gallery that illustrates various examples of Puerto Rican culture in a particular Chicago neighborhood". I assessed that it was not possible to create a valid FUR to enable the image to be kept on enwiki.

Kelly Xu: as best I recall, someone came on live help chat and wanted to know why that recently-created article was allowed to exist. I assessed the article and determined that, although it did cite several sources for its assertions of notability, none of those sources were at all reliable. As you can see from the edit summary in the deletion log, I explained why each source was not useful, and emphasized that once all these not-useful sources were eliminated, there was nothing left on which to base an article: notability was not asserted. There was no indication of importance. If you feel that using cryptic diglyphs in deletion logs is preferable to using detailed human-readable explanations, you are entitled to that opinion.

File:Dh logod.jpg: this was described as the logo of deathcore band Arsonists Get All the Girls. The uploader stated that it was "own work"; however, based on their edits, I feel it is unlikely that they are a member of AGAtG, and that instead, the statement is only valid insofar as the uploader was the one who extracted the image from the cover of the AGAtG album "The Game of Life". It is a derived work of a nonfree album cover (and is on the wrong side of the threshold of originality, as well). Thus, I concluded that the license was invalid and the image was nonfree. Furthermore, as best I can tell, only one of AGAtG's six albums used this image (it's not on their Facebook page, it's not on their Bandcamp page, it's not on the licensed t-shirts), which I assume is why the image isn't actually in use in the AGAtG article and hasn't been in years: I don't think it's actually their logo. Therefore, I concluded that there was no point in devising an FUR.

File:Esham1.jpg : a very small, low-resolution photo of rapper Esham Attica Smith, which has not been used in our article on Mr. Smith in well over a decade and a half. Edit summary on the upload indicated that it was taken from Mr. Smith's official website in 2006, which led me to conclude that it was highly unlikely to have been the uploader's own work, and thus that the licensing was equally unlikely to be valid. However, when compiling this reply to your question, I noticed that the uploader's username was that of the recording company founded by Mr. Smith and his brother. This new information has led me to conclude that we can reasonably assume the photo to be either the uploader's own work, or a work for hire produced by an employee or contractor of the uploader. Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. As such, if you wish to restore that (very small, low-resolution, unused) image and then import it to Commons, I will have no objections, although I do ask that you first make sure to fill in proper metadata on the image and also rename it so that its name is at least 10 characters long (perhaps "Esham Smith ca 2006"?).

If you feel that it is important for you to restore any of the other images, or the article, so that you can then implement a full-length formal deletion discussion for each of them, rather than accepting the validity of my rationales for each of those deletions, then by all means, I urge you to do so.

If you have further questions about any of my deletions, please ask; part of the ethos of the Wikimedia movement is sharing our knowledge. DS (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If "Dragonfly does not use the deletion rationales that I want him to" upsets you, I'm sorry to hear that. You can, as I said, restore any or all of the images and put them through full deletion debates. I will even participate in those debates if you notify me that you have begun them. I am always willing to explain my actions, and I am always willing to admit when I made a mistake (e.g., the photo of Mr. Smith); if you wish to audit my deletion log, go ahead. However, WP:IAR is still a guiding principle of this project: "If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it."
Are there any of the images which you feel should not have been deleted at all? If your answer is "no", then your situation resolves to "you have deleted images that I agree should have been deleted, but I do not approve of the reasons you provided in the edit summary". If your answer is "yes", I look forward to reading your explanation as to why.
Remember: process is important, but it is not all-important. Our overall goal, the one you and I share, is to make Wikipedia better. DS (talk) 16:20, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-51

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:22, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]