Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Contents/Portals/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

Accounting Portal

Hi, have no idea where to suggest, but would any kind soul work on an Accounting Portal? I am surprised that there is none. =) It would be very useful for non-accountants to learn about accounting especially at times like this. Cheers! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.7.144 (talk) 23:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I stole. leveraged (also known as 'killed') the past 'portal of the month' entries from this page to set up display of a random featured portal at Wikipedia:Featured content. However, only about half the existing featured portals have been showcased as 'portal of the month' (or week prior to that) so far. Should we wait until each featured portal is showcased before adding it to the list of those randomly displayed on that page, pick out images for the remaining featured portals and add them now, or do something else entirely for portals on the featured content page? We used to show the full list, but it was getting too big and not as 'neat' as the other featured sections. --CBD 18:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I must be missing something, because I can't find any "display of a random featured portal." In any event, I wouldn't worry about what's been displayed here. If you still intend to do it, just pick the ones that work for your porposes there. Rfrisbietalk 03:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
The pink box, right next to the featured article ;) --Quiddity 04:48, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh, that pink box. My pointless comment still stands! ;-) Rfrisbietalk 11:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Is Portal:list considered as the portal for Category:Portals?

?--Hillgentleman 07:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

No. It isn't a portal, it's a list. Rfrisbietalk 12:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Then is there a portal for Category:Portals?Hillgentleman 02:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
No, just this list and the guidelines page, Wikipedia:Portal. From Category:Portals, "A portal is a focus page which highlights a particular subject, to complement the main article on that subject. Portals feature articles covering the portal's theme, and generally provide lists of related articles, and thus provide an alternative means to browse on Wikipedia." Because portals focus on a specific topic, it doesn't make sense to create a portal of all portal topics. Rfrisbietalk 02:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I added a portals navigation footer that shows how this relates to other general portal pages. Rfrisbietalk 15:05, 19 October 2006 (UTC)


Tourism

Why isn't there a tourism portal, under the category Society & Social Sciences? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.27.91.175 (talk) 02:08, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

How about using the Wikipedia:Featured content/Portals page to randomly show featured portals here? I made a random featured portal test and it seems to work just fine. (In order to see it operate, you need to edit the test page, then "Show preview" to see the changes.) What do you think? Rfrisbietalk 16:23, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

  • And lose the monthly? How will we get new featured portals? How about placing a random feature on the Wikipedia:Featured portals page instead? It doesn't have any graphics at all.   The Transhumanist   18:26, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
    • As Transhumanist notes, I've been taking the content for the 'random featured portal' from the 'portal of the month' images here. Still, it wouldn't be a big deal to just come up with an image for each portal as it is elevated to featured status and add it to the random list. I'm fine with whatever. --CBD 19:12, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Replies to above comments: The box for displaying the "Monthly" isn't "lost," it's just updated every time the page is loaded. The "Portal of the Month" is just an arbitrary selection from the Featured portals list anyway. The process for selecting new featured portals isn't affected at all. The nomination process is described at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates. The randomized displays for featured content appears at Wikipedia:Featured content. I already added all the remaining featured portals to Wikipedia:Featured content/Portals, the page that actually ramdomizes the display. Adding any new featured portals to this display page is a very simple process. I've already shown how straightforward linking them here would be. Rfrisbietalk 19:45, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

I think that would be a good idea, having it change once a month (which didn't even happen that often a lot of the time anyway) stops a lot of the FP's from actually be recognised. Randomising it would make much more sense. chris_huh 19:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I like it. :) Support. --Quiddity 20:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
I made the randomize feature live to show more easily how it works. If you revert it, please give your reasons here. :-) Rfrisbietalk 21:13, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Looks very nice. The purge link right under the portal is a good addition as that's the only item on this page which changes. --CBD 10:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good to me.  The Transhumanist   16:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

they probably didn't because they didn't want to i went on for something and it did not have what i was looking for so wikipedia GET MORE THINGS ON THE PAGE FOR US well i guess it is still dumb but who am i to judge this dumb thing —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.158.51.2 (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Now that this page has failed the featured list nomination, I would like some feedback here. The nomination was disqualified for two basic reasons. First, it wasn't in article space/was in portal space. The consensus was that it then must not be a "list"/must be a "portal." Second, it didn't have a references section. The only suggested addition was to an atlas that confirmed world geography.

The "not a list" issue resulted in two recommendations, submit it at featured portals or create a new "other featured content" process. IMHO, neither suggestion should be pursued. A more plausible remedy to the disqualifications would be to move the page to List of portals and add a references section. Then the nomination could be resubmitted to the featured list process and get another hearing.

Is anyone else interested in pursuing featured list status for this page? Rfrisbietalk 20:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't think it really belongs in mainspace (as "list of portals"). If anything, it would make more sense in projectspace, as its format and intent is nigh identical to Wikipedia:Categorical index. But, I'm also not sure it needs any kind of featured status, primarily because it's already linked very prominently on the Main Page, and so doesn't really need any extra "promoting". Sorry :(
Ditto for the rest of the Contents pages, with the possible exception of List of academic disciplines which might be eligible as a featured list after a lot more work. The rest are too meta for me to think of them as articles. --Quiddity 20:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I see no point in pursuing featured status. It's a directory, not content.--cj | talk 07:48, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, there's no point in spitting into the wind on this one. However, it is a mystery to me why "support" pages like this shouldn't be subject to the same types of quality considerations as "content" pages. Rfrisbietalk 23:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I suppose because they verge on meta-data.--cj | talk 09:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

If you have the time and know-how

If you have the time and know how to do it, please add to the list some of the countries that have their own pages but aren't on this one. Example: Nauru. 204.95.23.122 22:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Anyone else feel the profusion of Featured Portal stars – though a good sign re quality! – detracts from the quality of this page...?  Perhaps featured portals might be indicated by (say) italic or bold-italic typeface...?  Regards, David Kernow (talk) 00:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree they're a bit much. I'll try bold-italics. Also, do you plan on doing anything about all the redirects and out-of-date page name references you created by moving the page? :-) Rfrisbietalk 02:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for trying the bold-italics. I think the page has now lost that slightly overloaded feel, but (yes, but...) I'd sympathize if someone said the featured items are now too underplayed... Maybe each section's featured portals could be featured along the lines of the following (hopefully without overloading the page again), i.e. using a single FA-star...?:


In lieu of other ideas, though, I guess I'd prefer underplayed to overloaded.

Re redirects, I thought there were a few too many to update (semi-)manually, but if something/manything's broken, please provide pointer/s and I'll attend to it/them. (Alternatively, I suppose I could try post a request here...)

Yours, David (talk) 13:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Considering the FP box in the upper right-hand corner has a link to the FP page, I think understatement here is just fine. I'd support the bot request too, but changing things like page & template titles probably has to be done manually. Rfrisbietalk 13:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)



if your ever right near the brooklyn bridge in new york city, go to the bottom and eat at grinaldies pizza. its an old italian pizzaria, and the pizza is awesome. they have old fashion root beer, and its based on a real italian pizzaria. the line is usually okay/big, bit that doesnt matter; the pizza is worth it! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.227.87 (talk) 01:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

why the heck r u talking about pizza dude so random i guess but seriously PIZZA!?!? lol —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.158.51.2 (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Curiosity

Out of my own curiosity, where can I find info about how often the portal namespace is frequented? It seems to me that the namespace if not visited too often by too many people, as they are not publicized a lot. Anyway, I just wanted to know the popularity of the pages in this namespace. Thanks. JARED(t)02:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikicharts gives an approximate hit count for pages in the Portal namespace for the current and recent months. The major subject portals and the List of portals are linked from the main page, at the top, next to the "Welcome to Wikipedia".-gadfium 02:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Idea for Portals

The Dutch wikipedia has some cool photographs at the top of all their portal pages. Any chance the english version could have these. I don't have the expertise to do something this compicated. This adress gives an example of what I am talking about. http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portaal:Kunst_%26_Cultuur Gollum45 17:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

They seem to use images consisting of several photos joined together, with the portal name superimposed on top. It's certainly a possibility for this project – though it would require a consensus that changing the layout of the portal to improve it is a good idea, for some of the more popular portals. I'm not sure where best to find someone with the skills to do these images, though; I guess you could ask at Wikipedia:Requested picturesQxz 20:47, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

I put it up there twice, but it was removed both times as well. It's already finished, so I'm putting it back up. --Toussaint 17:09, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Coorodination b/w portal catagories here & on main page

The major portal categories here ("Arts and Culture", "Current events", "Geography", "Health", "History", "Natural sciences and Mathematics", "Philosophy, Religion, and Spirituality", "Social sciences and Society", and "Technology") do not exactly correspond with those listed on the main page ("Arts", "Biography", "Geography", "History", "Mathematics", "Science", "Society", "Technology"), but there doesn't seem to be any logical reason for this to be the case. I'd propose coordinating the two, or at least adding "Health" and "Philosophy & Religion" to the main page, and perhaps "biography" to this one. Is there an underlying rationale here that I'm unaware of? -Rustavo 12:58, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I am not sure where to add Portal:Paranormal in this article, can someone add this if possible? (:O) -Nima Baghaei talk · cont · email 22:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Umbrella

I think Geography & Health should be included in the umbrella of "Natural Sciences and Mathematics". 130.126.246.122 03:32, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Monty Python

I think the world of Monty Python is big enough to warrant having its own portal, however, I don’t know how to go about creating a portal or what the criteria are for doing so.

The world of Monty Python my be big enough, but the real question is: is there enough Python content on Wikipedia to warrant a Portal? Looking at Category:Monty Python and its sub-cats, I count about 200 articles, 1/3 of which are sketches. I don't know if that's enough. You may want to ask over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Monty Python to see what they think. — Zaui (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)


Semi-protection

Some anonymous user has replaced the entire page with "Hi". Surely this page is important enough to warrant at least semi-protection? Ygoloxelfer 21:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Expand LGBT acronym?

Resolved

LGBT, I think, should be spelled out as LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) as the acronym is not universal (presented elsewhere as GLBT LGB, LGBTI, LGBTQ) so many (most?) looking for the information are unlikely to figure out that LGBT is the magic key to get to that portal. Benjiboi 21:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Topical contents pages transclusion test

I'm using this page to test the process of transcluding contents page sections to multiple pages. You can see the related discussion at Portal talk:Contents#Topics-based contents pages project. You can see a working example of how a section here is transcluded to another page at Portal:Contents/Arts and culture. RichardF 03:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Coordinating Portal:Contents pages

See Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Contents/archive1 for the discussion on the new page format..

A group of editors is working on coordinating Portal:Contents and all of its subpages. This activity has two basic parts. The simplest part is to coordinate their presentation, such as page layouts. Most of the discussions about how to accomplish this are at Portal talk:Contents. The more involved part is to coordinate their substance, such as what gets linked from the pages and their classifications. Most of the discussions about how to accomplish this are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Contents and related projects such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists of basic topics, Wikipedia:WikiProject Lists of topics, Wikipedia:WikiProject Glossaries, Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals and Wikipedia:WikiProject Categories. Please feel free to join in on these activities. RichardF (talk) 12:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

The format of this page now matches the format of the other main contents pages. See the discussion announced directly above for details. The Transhumanist    20:02, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikinews Importer Bot

Thanks to Misza13, the Wikinews Importer Bot now is available to automatically import certain dynamically-generated Wikinews pages into Wikipedia portals. See the pages that link to User:Wikinews Importer Bot for a growing list of examples. Check it out! RichardF (talk) 17:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

dose mermaids live? i hopr they do because a guy saw one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.127.108 (talk) 21:00, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I am looking for items on Quantum Physics - what a mind blowing study! Have several theories but can't find any chat or info.

My main theory is that each partical in our Harmony vibrates within a limit governed by the speed of light (within our Harmony). This way particals can be observed to be part of a wave (The two slot trick). If this is true, there may well be other harmonics of the speed of light. Time ahead may be elongated or compressed relative to time as we know it if we were able to enter another light harmonic.

Hay but I may be way off. I there is a chat portal on "Quantum Physics" please let me know.

Regards. Alan Alan92nd (talk) 18:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

General category

I propose having a general category, including e.g. world, world development, life, meaning of life, universe, humanity. Mikael Häggström (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Environment portal

How about an "Environment" portal? This could cover all topics related to the description/characterization, modeling/forecasting, exploitation, destruction and preservation/protection of the natural systems of our planet. This would include many areas of growing interest, such as global climate change, global dimming, biological diversity, urban sprawl, air, water, soil, sound and light pollution, etc. There are many Wikipedia articles that would be relevant, though many or even most of them would not show up in a search for the word "environment" or "environmental." I am really surprised this is not a "featured" portal, and more surprised not to find it in the list of portals.

Alfrogbet (talk) 04:39, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Austria ?

How come Austria is not included in the Portal-List of Europe ? Or did I miss something ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greybeard44 (talkcontribs) 16:17, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Cause we don't like them.  ;) J/K, maybe they don't meet some qualifying requirement, like Montana. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 16:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, don't others think it should be moved to Natural sciences? Physical science is indeed a natural science, and people call physics, chemistry and earth sciences natural sciencesw. --RekishiEJ (talk) 07:32, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

photo Syntesis is the process by which green plant can manufacture their food thru sunshine and chlorophy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.34.77.26 (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

In retrospect, it's a shame more of them didn't figured out how to make bread out of themselves. Maybe in a few more million years. GreenReaper (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Why is this portal called Agropedia can we change it ? Bewareofdog 02:06, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Health and Fitness Portal BROKEN

Hi, just letting someone who knows how to fix things know that if you scroll down to the health and fitness section it has a few lines of text in a foriegn language but no links etc. Please fix it. --60.242.56.215 (talk) 03:27, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

DPG Converter - Convert Video to DPG

DPG Converter - Convert Video to DPG The programs listed below are the easy-to-use and handy DPG converter tool that help you convert video files to DPG.Please click link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaodssl (talkcontribs) 07:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Aloysius Pieris

Aloysius Pieris is a Liberation Theologian in Asia.Pieris is the director of the Tulana Research Institute in Colombo, Sri Lanka .Pieris is famous among the theological-intellectual fields for his contribution to interfaith dialogue,with special reference to Buddhism.Religiosity and Poverty in Asia and Cosmic and Meta-Cosmic Religiosities are some of his major contributions to Theology-Sociology debate in the world today. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sahabanj (talkcontribs) 18:15, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

There is vandalism involving mustard on this page. I would fix it myself but I don't see the option for "edit". --210.248.139.35 (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Immu

Immu —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.99.197.2 (talk) 13:21, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Placement of portals, cleanup

I propose that we place the articles in a way that is more in line with what most other classification systems already have: Universal Decimal Classification, Library of Congress Classification, Dewey Decimal Classification.

  1. Generalities
  2. Philosophy and Psychology
  3. Religion and Theology
  4. Geography (large enough to require its own space here -- although maybe countries should be place on their own page and just have continents here.
  5. History, Auxillary history, political science
  6. Music, fine arts, entertainment
  7. Language and Literature
  8. Science, Medicine
  9. Technology and applied science

Here are some issues that I see:

  1. Literature belongs in its own section, not arts and society.
  2. The and belongs in Social Sciences under family life (sex life). This is where LLC puts it. Or put it under People and Self since that category already has something related to it. Although all of the parts about "self" seem to be sociology issues or philosophy issues.
  3. Current events science and technology should go under science and technology
  4. current events sports should go under sports.
  5. Science should be combined with Mathematics to be called "Science and Mathematics". You can't understand science without understanding mathematics.
  6. Political science goes under history, since most history is related to political science.
  7. History belongs in history
  8. Geography belongs in Geography
  9. Freemasonary belongs in society organizations.
  10. Boy Scouts belongs in society organizations
  11. Military science is applied science and technology
  12. The society and arts category should probably be called Arts and Entertainment.

Since I am not allowed to edit this page, I will leave it up to somebody else to correct these issues. There is no point to reinvent the wheel when most standard classification systems use the same breakup. They just use different codes to indicate them.

I also think that we should assign a 3 letter code to each portal that is unique to that portal. The first letter should be the main category it belongs to. The next two letters are for the portal itself.

Since DDC and UDC both use beginning numbers, they only have 10 main categories. LLC uses alphabetic, so they have 26 main categories (not all of them in current use) and then a second letter in each sub category. After that are numbers in ranges.

Zzmonty (talk) 22:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Portal:Soft Rock

Hi I created portal about Soft Rock genre of music (it's still under construction), but I'm starting to think about renaming it to Pop Rock, because this term is broader. In the other hand pop rock is a silly name, and not saying anything, and in fact one can argue what the pop rock really is, whilst Soft Rock as an opposite to the Hard Rock has rather clear description, it's a light genre of mainstream rock music.

Please give me some opinion whether should I leave Soft Rock name, or replace whole portal with a Pop Rock.


Shaman (talk) 16:22, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

portals

shouldn't this have a link to cross wiki portals? or something to that end? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.31.197.38 (talkcontribs) .

What do people think about this new portal created by someone the other day. I have major reservations and would like to hear other editors opinions (preferably on the talk page of the portal).-- Zleitzen(talk) 01:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC

Montana?

How come Montana isn't listed under geography? Or is it my eyesight?

Pseudoscience

I think Pseudosciences should be listed as a sub under sciences. If no one objects, I'll add within a few days. Joe I 23:27, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Top five occupations listed by race / ethnicity

Looking for information to help my research on race and popular occupations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.191.242.248 (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Flags

Do we really need this flagcruft in the geography section? It only makes it illegible. — Kpalion(talk) 20:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Agree. remove flags or put them in an ordered wikitable. Elekhh (talk) 03:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
Agree with all the above. -- Quiddity (talk) 02:15, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm all for that. My concern was adding the numerous missing countries and states - I was following the format of the other entries. 76.105.199.24 (talk) 01:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Sounds like consensus. We only need a volunteer now to take down the flags.Elekhh (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Portal needs improvement

This portal is viewed 200,000 times a month, yet is in pretty bad shape. Many issues have been discussed presviously (see talk page archives above) however some persist:

  • no clear order: there is a lack of consistency in the grouping and ordering of the lists. It is a bizarre mix of thematic and alphabetic order;
  • poor visual appearance: colour scheme, symbols, flags clutter etc. Have a look to german interwiki page for comparison German Wikipedia Portals

Some suggestions:

  • Sports and Games doesn't fit verry well into Culture and the Arts. could be moved to Health and Fitness or form a separate section;
  • Architecture is more than just Visual arts; could be separate sub-category; while Film is more a visual art than a performin art.
  • The sciences: Mathematics and logic, Natural and physical sciences and Technology and applied sciences could be grouped somehow together. Elekhh (talk) 06:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

As per comments above I changed the icons from the Nuvola style [1] to the P_icon style [2]. I thought the improvement would be obvious to anybody: P_ style is visually coherent and provides wikipedia a more professional look. However the changes (in the template) were reverted by Quiddity requesting discussion. I still support P_icons. Elekhh (talk) 00:46, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

The template Portal:Contents/Types TOC and its icons, are used in ALL of the pages listed in {{Contents pages (header bar)}}. Hence it would need to be discussed/mentioned at all of those pages, before any changes are made. (The parent wikiproject is ostensibly Wikipedia:WikiProject Contents, but I don't think there are more than 3 people watching it currently.)
The same goes for any major resorting: The 12 section headings (eg "Mathematics and logic") are currently consistent across all these content portals. Sorting the contents within each section is perfectly fine, but changing the actual headings around is much more complicated. -- Quiddity (talk) 02:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Icons

I'm proposing replacing the icons in the TOC with a visually more cohesive style. As these icons appear on multiple pages, please go to Portal talk:Contents/Types TOC to see and discuss this proposal. Elekhh (talk) 02:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

The existence of this portal is a discussed subject (see the discussion section on the Cannabis portal page). Also, Cannabis is a subject which reaches far more beyond Health and fitness. The medicinal properties of this plant is just a small part of the whole subject. Therefore I don't think the link is appropriate and that it should not be placed under "Health and fitness". Also check Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cannabis --Dehugs (talk) 09:31, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

This discussion is moved to http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Portal:Cannabis --Dehugs (talk) 09:00, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree that the Cannabis Portal is not best categorized within the Health and fitness section. But where? Society? As I mentioned in the discussion at WikiProject Cannabis, cannabis is a plant (biology) with psychoactive (drug) chemical properties (chemistry) that has a cultural (society) and political (politics/law) impact. The subjects encapsulates many different areas of interest, but I think "Society" is most appropriate. Comments? --Another Believer (Talk) 07:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Sports and Games

Definitely needs it's own section. I've just tried to find Gliding by coming down from the top and its impossible. If you work back from Gliding you get to Category:Air Sports and Category:Sports_by_type and Category:Sports, but nowhere near a portal. The whole structure of portals appears to be isolated from categories. --Impeachable (talk) 09:11, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Messianic Judaism

There is already a link to messianic judaism in the Christianity section. Why is there also one in the Judaism section directly under it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.222.219.78 (talk) 23:27, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

I removed the duplicate from the Christianity section (hopefully that was the correct choice :) -- Quiddity (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Portal: Renewable energies

Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia, don't shoot the noob ;)

The Renewable energies portal is listed in the page and indeed has a page but the links inside this page send back to a page saying that there is no such portal. Same if you try to embed the portal icon in an article. I don't get it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregory Dziedzic (talkcontribs) 22:16, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

The Maclean Brothers

The MacLean Brothers are a rising Canadian rock quartet formed in 2008 by Paul, Travis, and David MacLean (sons of the late, popular musical comedy duo MacLean & MacLean) with singer/songwriter Michael Vermeylen.

The band is currently based out of Winnipeg, Canada, where they have earned the reputation of packing clubs to capacity.

In March/April 2010 the band embarked on their first Asian tour performing in Japan and South Korea where they were featured in a full photo shoot spread for the Korean pop culture magazine “Groove Korea”.

In January 2010, Michael Vermeylen, the group’s frontman, recorded a music video for Kab TV entitled Brand New World which is now in regular rotation on Channel 66 in Israel.

The band has shared the stage with Guess Who frontman, Burton Cummings, who is slated to collaborate with the group’s three brothers in an upcoming musical project entitled “M3C”.

The MacLean Brothers are currently working on an EP produced by Chris Burke-Gaffney of The Pumps and CBG Artist development (whose former clients include multi-platinum artist Chantal Kreviazuk and Mcmaster & James) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.234.214 (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Introduction is too far down the page; portals as a better alternative to "random article"

I think the introduction to portals should come first on the page, instead of starting with a slightly off-putting list of links that takes up half the page.

Also, that introduction as it stands does not mention an exciting new use case of portals, more important than serving as an introduction and editing help: They can act much like the "random article" button, but with more control about the topic covered. The "random article" link seems to be surprisingly popular among readers of WP who are just bored, so pointing them to portals as a better alternative might make sense.

To back up my point, I'm quoting from a blog[3] that shows the problem with lacking awareness of portals:

It was my intention to base my posts off of the first random article generated by Wikipedia. But some of them are maybe a little too random. To demonstrate, I am going to write down the subjects of the next ten articles I find:
(...)
None of those subjects really stood out to me as something I would like to dedicate a post to. Perhaps I'll record things that I'm interested in and would like to research anyway. I imagine much of it will be nutrition/health related...

So the above guy obviously did not find the Health and fitness portal! I don't know if the usability study has looked at awareness of portals among readers, but I think they are missed easily because the links are in the header ("Welcome the Wikipedia") where most people probably ignore them.

Perhaps the main page needs a "Still bored?" link after the dynamic content boxes with added suggestions such as portals. --Morn (talk) 13:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

how old is "traditional"?

Can anyone tell me ... how old does a recipe (or anything else come to think of it) have to be to attain the title "traditional"?

I only ask as I've been looking at potatoe recipes recently and found plenty from europe that have contained "traditional" in the title or discription. which made me wonder as obviously potatoes are not of european origins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.20.228 (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Contents pages navigation proposal

A proposal to add topical links to all of the contents pages has been made. As part of that proposal, the navigation bar at the top of these contents pages would look like this.


All who read this invitation, please respond to the proposal, Portal talk:Contents#Adding topical links to contents pages navigational headers and footers, as you see fit. Regards, RichardF (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Removal of portals

There is currently a talk that all may not see concerning this page at Portal talk:Contents/Portals/Religion and belief systems about the inclusion of Portal:Atheism and Portal:Nontheism being listed in the Religion and belief systems section.Moxy (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit request from 86.143.221.76, 2 June 2011


86.143.221.76 (talk) 18:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. GaneshBhakt (talk) 19:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Bahá'í has no Indian roots, and what is "Abrahamic"?

I'm sorry, but the Bahá'í faith is no way a religion that have or refer to both Abrahamic and Indian sources. Bahá'í emerged from Shia Islam in Iran. In the beginning of the 19th century a Shia sect called Shaykhism was waiting for the promised one. In 1844 a young merchant i Shiraz in Iran declared that he was the gate to a new belief system enjoined by God. He took the name Báb (portal, gate) and the Bábí faith magnetized tens of thousands Iranians. After Báb's martyr death Bahá'u'lláh reshaped the Bábí faith to the Bahá'í faith, mainly when he was expatriated to Adrianople (1863-1868) in the European part of the Ottoman Empire. Bahá'u'lláh's son 'Abdu'l-Bahá traveled 1912-1913 to Europe and USA to spread the Bahá'í faith. Disciples spread the new religion to countries as India, and many bahá'ís also escaped from Iran to India. But India did not take part in the development of the Bahá'í faith. The only connection to India is that 'Abdu'l-Bahá identified Buddha and Krishna as messengers from God together with Zoroaster, Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, Báb and Bahá'u'lláh. Bahá'í has no Indian sources and I find the concept "Abrahamic" nonscientific.

There are a lot of Bahá'í believers in India, but this followers has not participated in building the Bahá'í belief system. Bahá'í has its sources in 1) Iran 1844-1852, 2) Iraq (Baghdad area) 1852-1863, 3) Adrianople (Edirne) in the European part of Osmanic Empire 1963-1868, 4) Acre and Haifa in the Levant part of Osmanic Empire and later British Palestine and Israel 1868-today, and in Europe and USA together with the world center in Acre/Haifa from 1900 – today. --Caspiax (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

I am a beleiver of — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.30.70 (talk) 17:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

TopPage view lacks arts, performing arts, music - nada.

It breaks down to micro-managed detail some "hard" topics, showing, for instance, Mathematics at the top of the page, but not a hint at any kind of performing arts or fine arts, which are relegated to a ghetto below the TopPage textbox. What I suggest is that the text box at the top have a least one link to the arts, even though there is a textbox for culture below it. Just, (yawn) MHO...(GeoBardRap 20:14, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Battlestar Galactica

Sorry, hope this isn't too silly a question, but does this page list all portals? Because [[4]] isn't listed. Heywoodg 12:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

The page Portal:Battlestar Galactica is just a redirect to the WikiProject, following this deletion discussion. So I don't think it belongs on the "contents" page. -- John of Reading (talk) 13:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Ahh. Great, thanks for the explanation. Heywoodg 14:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

    Isaac Wolf wrote to Stephen Gatsos;" 83-82 Georgia Tech wins."
         "James Forrest Topples Trojans". That is another basketball reference.
               People can write to Isaac at: Attention Isaac Wolf
                                             c\o Georgetown Christian Church
                                             9420 State Road 64,
                                             Georgetown,Indiana 47122.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.142.2.98 (talk) 18:11, 15 November 2011 (UTC) 

Proposal to change a section title

There's a proposal to adjust one of the main section titles used in "Wikipedia's contents". See Portal talk:Contents#Proposal for main section title adjustment. The Transhumanist 10:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit request

Include redirect WP:8 in a "Shortcuts" box. 71.146.20.62 (talk) 03:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Swiss Hotel Kashmir

Swiss Hotel Kashmir started its operation from Ist May 1998. The hotel is situated at one of Srinagar's most sophisticated suburbs only 2 kms from the Tourist Reception Center Srinagar. Swiss Hotel Kashmir is an eco friendly and commission free hotel.Swiss Hotel Kashmir is recommended by all the major travel guides of India & worldwide.Swiss Hotel Kashmir is an established Srinagar based hotel group offering refined services which includes warmth and grace in our own distinctive style.

The aim to support the local economy by using local suppliers for food and other services. Swiss hotel uses energy saving lighting and equipment.Long term aim is to reduce our environmental impact by the use of solar heaters for water heating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnroofa12345 (talkcontribs) 07:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

pronunciation of words would be helpful. a proninciation category.

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.121.53 (talk) 06:25, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

pronunciation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.121.53 (talk) 06:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Toni Oliver Llompart

toni oliver llompart nacido el 2 de julio de 1990 es un brillante estudiante de economia. en la actualidad cursa el 3 curso con unas notas impecables. Practico durante muchos años taekwondo quedando 2 en el torneo de su gimnasio. Grande en las artes marciales y todo un maestro en las artes del amor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joanperello (talkcontribs) 22:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

This is not a good place to submit content for the encyclopedia. I suggest you have a look at "Your first article". -- John of Reading (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Samir Bol

Samir Bol (Arabic:سمير بول), his full name is Samir Abdalkarim Bol , South Sudanese Journalist born at 23 April 1980 in Rumbek — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samirbol80 (talkcontribs) 17:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

This is not a good place to submit content for the encyclopedia. I suggest you have a look at "Your first article" and also "Wikipedia:Autobiography". -- John of Reading (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


Dedeke Syndrome

Dedeke Syndrome. Defined definition: Extreme Paranoia and Schizophrenia. Causes: Poor self image, insecurity & guilt. Symptoms: Dislike of others, guilt transference, causing trouble for others through deceit, wrongful taking of others property to appease their feeling of being shortchanged and/or cheated by the world and/or others. Also See The Nelson maneuver. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macphale (talkcontribs) 14:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

This is not a good place to submit content for the encyclopedia. I suggest you have a look at "Your first article". -- John of Reading (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quick creations of portals

I'd like to quickly create some Wikipedia portals so the "decades" have their portals.

The French Wikipedia has fr:Portail:Années 2010 and other decade portals. We need these on EN as well WhisperToMe (talk) 05:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Naumanism

The word references the work of contemporary American artist Bruce Nauman and the influence of his work processes and style. Naumanism is an homage to Nauman's contribution to Contemporary Art, indicating a certain naumanistic style where the artwork describes an uncomfortable situation and creates a certain element of confusion for the viewer. Pri3io (talk) 17:41, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

please help....I have to analize a children poetry

I have to make a description as in what children can learn from this poetry whar sort of verbs were used?...adjectives?..I have no idea how to do this!

I'm a robot
My name is Sam
I have 2 legs, 2 hands and 2 eyes
But I am sad, because I don't have a heart.
Mum, why do I need 2 legs, 2 hands and 2 eyes
If I don't have a heart?
That's ok, my little Sam
You are a robot and
You don't need a heart.
..

please email me at [details removed] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.100.89.124 (talk) 10:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

This isn't a good place to ask general questions, so I suggest you ask at the Language reference desk. However, they won't do your homework for you! I have removed your email address to protect your privacy. -- John of Reading (talk) 11:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

2012 ITOCA Wikimedia training Centurion

Abulele — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlaqSun86 (talkcontribs) 14:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

No longer maintaining "featured star" on this page

We at WP:FPORTC will no longer be maintaining the "featured star" on this particular page for updating or maintenance. It can of course still list existing portals, but their featured quality status can be seen instead, at WP:Featured Portals page. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Mathematics section vandalism

Someone replaced the content of the section of Mathematics with a single big caps word. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 14:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for reporting this. Someone else noticed it too and has fixed it. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Is this a good idea to add?

Moxy (talk) 01:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Could have some use. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:42, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
I think it would need refining beyond the current default. Eg. searching for africa gives 5,150 results, and even adding an "intitle:" gives 735 results.
Is there any way to have it only search the root-level (ie. not picking up all the subpages) ? I think that would solve the problem, but I'm not sure if it's possible. –Quiddity (talk) 00:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Outdated

This page is pretty outdated, as it is listing 1126 portals, and I have over 1300 listed at User:Sven Manguard/List of Portals, which was done using a namespace search.

My proposal is that we scratch this page entirely in favor of a dynamically generated page. Portals can be divided into sections using categories (likely purpose-built hidden maintenance categories to avoid compliations). Marking portals as featured can be handled by cross checking with Category:Featured portals.

Thoughts? Sven Manguard Wha? 20:43, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

As far as I know, this page is not supposed to list all things in portal space, just those sufficiently constructed to be ready for viewers, which might explain some of the discrepancy. If an automated system were used then an opt-out/in code would have to be used. Also, some portals should be listed under multiple sections. Espresso Addict (talk) 18:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
I don't really think that's what happened. I think it simply stopped being updated regularly. If what we want is a showcase of portals, perhaps we can just pick 200 or so that are on major topics and do that. But that's not what this page appears to be trying to do. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Espresso Addict has it correct. I've been watching and helping to maintain these pages since 2006, and can tell you for certain that they are only intended for reasonably-complete portals - incomplete/abandoned/broken portals are removed, following the same criteria as Wikipedia:Portal/Directory.
I think the review & analysis that you've started at User:Sven Manguard/List of Portals is a really good idea. I'd suggest moving it to Wikipedia:Portal/List of Portals to encourage more people to help out, and maintain it continuously.
Regarding the idea of just dynamically creating a list - that would make it too easy to avoid editorial scrutiny, because category-changes are very difficult to watchlist. –Quiddity (talk) 03:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
I agree with Quiddity's idea of moving Sven's list of portals to somewhere centralised where other editors can help out. I've wondered about a coordinated review of featured portals; I know Bencherlite was working on one in userspace, but I've lost the link. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
You all should feel free to take a copy, either the one I started or a clean one (go back in the edit history to get a clean one if you want), and move it to a centralized page. List of Portals isn't really my priority right now, List of Featured Portals is the priority, and that one I need to do myself. I'd be glad to help out with the list of all portals once I finish getting through the featured ones and seeing which ones need saving and which ones need delisting. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:30, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Interested in what you're doing with the featured portals and agree they are a more-urgent priority. I do think it might be more politic to do the review as a group effort, with agreed criteria, like the Good article sweeps of a few years back. I know Bencherlite was doing something similar a while back. Espresso Addict (talk) 18:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
I've been doing it myself because there are very few people that would be as careful/harsh as I am in doing the reviews, and I want to catch everything so that we have a very good grasp of where we stand before we consider the main page. That being said, you've got recent experience with the standards (which are much tighter than they were when many of these portals were promoted). If you think you can be as aggressive/pedantic in the reviews as I am being, feel free to help out. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:51, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

The Main Page Featured Portal drive was successfully completed.

This was a collaborative initiative created to get all portals linked from the top-right of the Main Page to Featured Portal quality status.

Thank you to all who participated or contributed towards this quality improvement effort in some way.

Happy Holidays,

Cirt (talk) 17:55, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 April 2014

Prince0001 (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC) request are not allowed that begain interfair between espect element that are not allowed to begain on this services

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for script fixing

Hi, I know that no-one reads these talk pages, but on the off-chance someone does, can they please fix the errors on the Portal:Democratic Republic of the Congo please? Quotes etc. do not choose from the available options, but show all of them. Thanks! Brigade Piron (talk) 16:59, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

@Brigade Piron: You are in luck! Fixed with this edit; if you add more quotes remember to adjust the value of "max". -- John of Reading (talk) 17:33, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
@John of Reading:, that's a massive help! Many thanks indeed! Brigade Piron (talk) 21:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2014

58.146.112.131 (talk) 18:27, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 18:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 October 2014

i mean 'CRICKET TO IMPACT OF HEALTH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.34.57.247 (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

New Portal over at AfC

Hi. Just wanted to let you folks know that there is a new portal over at AfC, awaiting approval. I figured someone from this project might want to take a look at it and approve/decline it. Here's the link: Draft:Portal:Tuvalu. Thanks. Onel5969 (talk) 13:46, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Onel5969: This is easily good enough to be moved to the Portal namespace; the formatting is mostly correct, as far as I can see, and there is a good selection of articles, biographies and pictures. An admin will be able to move everything efficiently, so perhaps post at WP:RM to get it moved. -- John of Reading (talk) 15:23, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2015

Furious 8 is an upcoming live action film. The film is the eight installment in the fas and furious series. Vin diesel confirmed fo the film release on April 14 2017.

Vin Diesel heartedly added that "the eight is for PAUL."


                                                                               Starring
   
                                                                                 Vin Diesel
                                                                                Coddy Walker
                                                                                Caleb Walker
                                                                               Dwayne Johnson
                                                                            Mischelle Rodrigue
                                                                             Jordana Brewstar
                                                                              Tyrese Gibson
                                                                                 Ludacris
                                                                            Nathalie Emmanual
                                                                                Lucas Black
                                                                              Nathalie Kelly
                                                                                Eva Mendes
                                                                               Ronda Russey
                                                                               

117.208.39.27 (talk) 11:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as you are in the wrong place, since this page is only to discuss improvements to Portal:Contents/Portals.
If you want to suggest a change, please request this on the talk page of the relevant article in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 June 2015

Could we protect all portals — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymous 15:52, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

It would be possible, but then who would maintain them? At present, the same Wikipedia:Protection policy applies to all pages including portals. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2015

is fincaittieri Marinette marine tax exempt if so how much do they save each year

Warnerpeter (talk) 18:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 19:11, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2016

Is United States Coast Guard tax exempt or do they pay taxes if they are tax exepmt how much do they save each year in taxes


198.52.13.15 (talk) 20:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Portal:Contents/Portals. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:29, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Sherlock Holmes

Should Portal:Sherlock Holmes not be listed under literature rather than television (as far as I can seethe portal covers all of Sherlock Holmes, not just the various TV adaptations)? Dunarc (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Dunarc: Yes, I think so. I've moved it up to "Novels". -- John of Reading (talk) 09:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks. Dunarc (talk) 15:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Village Pump proposal to delete all Portals

Editors might be interested to see a discussion concerning the proposed deletion of all Portals across Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#RfC:_Ending_the_system_of_portals Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 19:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

Bullets or commas?

This portal and its subpages should have a consistent format. Should links be separated by bullets or commas? RockMagnetist(talk) 17:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

While we're at it, there should also be a consistent convention about formatting of headings. When should they be on a separate line from the links? And should they ever be linked themselves? RockMagnetist(talk) 17:02, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

It is consistent. The commas are used within parentheses, and the parentheses indicated another level down the hierarchy. For example, in the regional sections, cities of a country are in parentheses, separated by commas. This allows cities to be included in a list of countries. The commas make it easier to visually discern a parenthetical grouping. It is the standard used across all the Portal:Contents pages.    — The Transhumanist   23:15, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
O.k., that explains a lot of the formatting, but (for example) Portal:Contents/Portals/Culture and the arts doesn't follow that scheme. RockMagnetist(talk) 15:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

These are not listed yet

Each item in this list needs to be processed as explained below. Please do as many as you have time for. Every little bit helps...

First, look at a portal on the list, and inspect it to see if it is completed. Most incomplete portals have one or more empty sections that have nothing more than a red subpage link in the middle of them.

If a portal is not complete, either complete it, or mark the entry " Not ready" with the {{Not ready}} template. That will let others know it needs work.

If an entry below is a completed portal, add it to Portal:Contents/Portals. After you've added it, please mark that entry below as " Done", using the {{done}} template.

Also use this list to update the Category:Portals under construction. To do so, add that category to the "Not ready" portals.

Thank you.

list

To be checked

  1. Portal:Gilgit-Baltistan  Done
  2. Portal:Internet Relay Chat  Done
  3. Portal:Micronations  Done
  4. Portal:Music of Colombia  Done
  5. Portal:Music of Trinidad and Tobago  Done
  6. Portal:Osaka University  Done
  7. Portal:Pharmacy and pharmacology  Done
  8. Portal:Pyrotechnics  Done
  9. Portal:Queens of the Stone Age  Done
  10. Portal:Railways in Pakistan  Done
  11. Portal:Rajasthan  Done
  12. Portal:Robert E. Howard  Done
  13. Portal:Romanian football  Done
  14. Portal:Software testing  Done
  15. Portal:Sony Not ready
  16. Portal:South Park  Done
  17. Portal:Sri Lanka Railways  Done
  18. Portal:Ancient Tamil civilization  Done
  19. Portal:Technology in Pakistan  Done
  20. Portal:Trauma and orthopaedics  Done
  21. Portal:UK Railways  Done
  22. Portal:Urdu  Done
  23. Portal:Virginia Woolf  Done
  24. Portal:War of 1812  Done

Done

  1. Portal:Abkhazia  Done
  2. Portal:Acadia  Done
  3. Portal:Adele  Done
  4. Portal:Ajman  Done
  5. Portal:Alps  Done
  6. Portal:Ammonoids  Done
  7. Portal:Anatomy  Done
  8. Portal:Ancient warfare  Done
  9. Portal:Ankara  Done
  10. Portal:Aquarium fish  Done
  11. Portal:Arab world  Done
  12. Portal:Arab–Israeli conflict  Done
  13. Portal:Ariana Grande  Done
  14. Portal:Arijit Singh  Done
  15. Portal:Artsakh  Done
  16. Portal:Aruba  Done
  17. Portal:Assyrians  Done
  18. Portal:Atlanta  Done
  19. Portal:Atlantic Coast Conference  Done
  20. Portal:Aztec mythology  Done
  21. Portal:Balochistan, Pakistan  Done
  22. Portal:Baltimore  Done
  23. Portal:Baseball in Japan  Done
  24. Portal:Battleships  Done
  25. Portal:Bengali cinema  Done
  26. Portal:Berkshire  Done
  27. Portal:Biological warfare  Done
  28. Portal:Blu-ray  Done
  29. Portal:Body modification  Done
  30. Portal:Brachiopods  Done
  31. Portal:Brighton  Done
  32. Portal:British Library  Done
  33. Portal:British Virgin Islands  Done
  34. Portal:Brittany  Done
  35. Portal:Brunei  Done
  36. Portal:Buckinghamshire  Done
  37. Portal:Buses  Done
  38. Portal:California Roads  Done
  39. Portal:Cambrian  Done
  40. Portal:Canada Roads  Done
  41. Portal:Cannabis  Done
  42. Portal:Cape Cod and the Islands  Done
  43. Portal:Carboniferous  Done
  44. Portal:Caribbean Community  Done
  45. Portal:Carpathian Ruthenia  Done
  46. Portal:Central Asia  Done
  47. Portal:Christian hardcore  Done
  48. Portal:Christianity in India  Done
  49. Portal:Christmas  Done
  50. Portal:City of Port of Spain  Done
  51. Portal:City of San Fernando  Done
  52. Portal:Civil engineering  Done
  53. Portal:Civil rights movement  Done
  54. Portal:Classical civilisation  Done
  55. Portal:Color  Done
  56. Portal:Commonwealth realms  Done
  57. Portal:Complementary and alternative medicine  Done
  58. Portal:Computer-generated imagery  Done
  59. Portal:Cretaceous  Done
  60. Portal:Crusades  Done
  61. Portal:Cultural Heritage of Serbia  Done
  62. Portal:Daddy Yankee  Done
  63. Portal:Dannii Minogue  Done
  64. Portal:Death metal  Done
  65. Portal:Desouk  Done
  66. Portal:Devonian  Done
  67. Portal:Dhallywood  Done
  68. Portal:Dorset  Done
  69. Portal:Dravidian civilizations  Done
  70. Portal:Dubai  Done
  71. Portal:Early modern Britain  Done
  72. Portal:East Germany  Done
  73. Portal:East Midlands England  Done
  74. Portal:East Timor  Done
  75. Portal:Ediacaran  Done
  76. Portal:Education in India  Done
  77. Portal:Emo  Done
  78. Portal:European military history  Done
  79. Portal:European Space Agency  Done
  80. Portal:Evanescence  Done
  81. Portal:Evangelical Christianity  Done
  82. Portal:Extinct and endangered species  Done
  83. Portal:Faisalabad  Done
  84. Portal:Ferrari  Done
  85. Portal:Film in the United States  Done
  86. Portal:Fordham University  Done
  87. Portal:Franco-Americans  Done
  88. Portal:Free and open-source software  Done
  89. Portal:French politics  Done
  90. Portal:Frogs and toads  Done
  91. Portal:Gaelic games  Done
  92. Portal:Gaspésie  Done
  93. Portal:G­eloupe  Done
  94. Portal:Genocide  Done
  95. Portal:Geography of Kenya  Done
  96. Portal:Glee  Done
  97. Portal:Government of the Philippines  Done
  98. Portal:Grenada  Done
  99. Portal:Grey's Anatomy  Done
  100. Portal:Haryana  Done
  101. Portal:Harz Mountains  Done
  102. Portal:Hazara people  Done
  103. Portal:Hindu mythology  Done
  104. Portal:History of Imperial China  Done
  105. Portal:Holy Roman Empire  Done
  106. Portal:Housing  Done
  107. Portal:Human body  Done
  108. Portal:Human spaceflight  Done
  109. Portal:Ichthyosauromorphs  Done
  110. Portal:Indian wildlife  Done
  111. Portal:IndyCar  Done
  112. Portal:Inland Empire  Done
  113. Portal:Intelligence  Done
  114. Portal:International relations  Done
  115. Portal:Iranian Azerbaijan  Done
  116. Portal:Isle of Man TT  Done
  117. Portal:Isle of Wight  Done
  118. Portal:Ivory Coast  Done
  119. Portal:Jessica Simpson  Done
  120. Portal:Juanes MfD 19 May 2018  Done
  121. Portal:Jurassic  Done
  122. Portal:Kanye West  Done
  123. Portal:Kashmir  Done
  124. Portal:Kesha  Done
  125. Portal:Khyber Pakhtunkhwa  Done
  126. Portal:Kingdom of France  Done good one!
  127. Portal:Kochi  Done
  128. Portal:Kuwait  Done
  129. Portal:Lancashire  Done
  130. Portal:Lemony Snicket  Done
  131. Portal:Lepidosaurs  Done
  132. Portal:London transport  Done
  133. Portal:Madurai  Done
  134. Portal:Malacca  Done
  135. Portal:Maldives  Done
  136. Portal:Marvel Cinematic Universe  Done
  137. Portal:Maryland Roads  Done
  138. Portal:Masculinism  Done However, the Things to Do section may belong more at WikiProject Men's Issues
  139. Portal:Mauricie  Done
  140. Portal:Medieval Britain  Done
  141. Portal:Mediterranean  Done
  142. Portal:Meghan Trainor  Done
  143. Portal:Men's rights movement  Done
  144. Portal:Messianic Judaism  Done
  145. Portal:Metro Detroit  Done
  146. Portal:Michigan Highways  Done
  147. Portal:Military of Germany  Done
  148. Portal:Mitochondria  Done
  149. Portal:Mitt Romney  Done
  150. Portal:Molecular and cellular biology Done
  151. Portal:Molecular anthropology  Done
  152. Portal:Monmouth  Done
  153. Portal:Montérégie  Done
  154. Portal:Mosasaurs  Done
  155. Portal:Myanmar  Done
  156. Portal:National Basketball League of Canada  Done
  157. Portal:National Register of Historic Places  Done
  158. Portal:Nazism  Done
  159. Portal:Negros Oriental  Done
  160. Portal:Neogene  Done
  161. Portal:New Rochelle, New York  Done
  162. Portal:New York Roads  Done
  163. Portal:New York (state)  Done
  164. Portal:Newar  Done
  165. Portal:Nicki Minaj  Done
  166. Portal:Nishapur  Done
  167. Portal:Normandy  Done
  168. Portal:North East England  Done
  169. Portal:Northamptonshire  Done
  170. Portal:Ordovician  Done
  171. Portal:Pakistan Super League  Done
  172. Portal:Paleogene  Done
  173. Portal:Paleozoic  Done
  174. Portal:Parliamentary procedure  Done
  175. Portal:Peak District  Done
  176. Portal:Peer review  Done
  177. Portal:Pensacola  Done
  178. Portal:Permian  Done
  179. Portal:Piracy  Done
  180. Portal:Precambrian  Done
  181. Portal:Pseudosuchians  Done
  182. Portal:Punjab (Pakistan)  Done
  183. Portal:Quaternary prehistory  Done
  184. Portal:Ravidassia  Done
  185. Portal:Rhône-Alpes  Done
  186. Portal:Rivers State  Done
  187. Portal:Romani people  Done
  188. Portal:Royal Australian Navy  Done
  189. Portal:Royalty  Done
  190. Portal:Sabah  Done
  191. Portal:Sacramento, California  Done
  192. Portal:Salamanders  Done
  193. Portal:San Diego County  Done
  194. Portal:Sauropterygians  Done
  195. Portal:Seamounts  Done
  196. Portal:Seattle Sounders FC  Done
  197. Portal:Selena  Done
  198. Portal:Serials  Done
  199. Portal:Sharjah  Done
  200. Portal:Silurian  Done
  201. Portal:Sindh  Done
  202. Portal:Smooth jazz  Done
  203. Portal:Snakes  Done
  204. Portal:Soap operas and telenovelas  Done
  205. Portal:Soft Rock  Done
  206. Portal:Somaliland  Done
  207. Portal:Spanish American wars of independence  Done
  208. Portal:Sports in Canada  Done
  209. Portal:Staffordshire  Done
  210. Portal:Submarine  Done
  211. Portal:Surrey  Done
  212. Portal:Sussex  Done
  213. Portal:Syriac Christianity  Done
  214. Portal:Tamil People  Done
  215. Portal:Taylor Swift  Done
  216. Portal:Television in Canada  Done
  217. Portal:Television in the United Kingdom  Done
  218. Portal:Television in the United States  Done
  219. Portal:Texas A&M University  Done
  220. Portal:Texas Tech University  Done
  221. Portal:The Ohio State University  Done
  222. Portal:The X-Files  Done
  223. Portal:Tiruchirappalli  Done
  224. Portal:Tobago  Done
  225. Portal:Transylvania  Done
  226. Portal:Triassic  Done
  227. Portal:Trilobites  Done
  228. Portal:Twilight  Done
  229. Portal:U.S. Roads  Done
  230. Portal:Ulan Bator  Done
  231. Portal:United States Merchant Marine  Done
  232. Portal:University of Chicago  Done
  233. Portal:University of Houston  Done
  234. Portal:University of Texas at Austin  Done
  235. Portal:University of the Arctic  Done
  236. Portal:Volcanism of Canada  Done
  237. Portal:Washington & Jefferson College  Done
  238. Portal:Washington Roads  Done
  239. Portal:Washington, D.C.  Done
  240. Portal:West Sussex  Done
  241. Portal:Whitney Houston  Done
  242. Portal:Wikimedia featured content  Done
  243. Portal:Winter Paralympics  Done

Not ready

  1. Portal:1940s Not ready
  2. Portal:Adelaide Not ready
  3. Portal:Ainu Not ready
  4. Portal:Algae Not ready
  5. Portal:All Saints Not ready
  6. Portal:Amphibians and reptiles Not ready
  7. Portal:Amphibians Not ready
  8. Portal:Amsterdam Not ready
  9. Portal:Android Not ready
  10. Portal:Ashura Not ready
  11. Portal:Asian Americans Not ready
  12. Portal:Australia portals ☒N (partial portal - should be merged into Portal:Australia)
  13. Portal:Azad Kashmir Not ready
  14. Portal:Bahamas Not ready
  15. Portal:Bahrain Not ready
  16. Portal:Belemnoids Not ready
  17. Portal:Butterflies and moths Not ready
  18. Portal:Carnatic music Not ready
  19. Portal:Celtic Studies Not ready (only has a few boxes and still has a "How-to" box at the bottom)
  20. Portal:Cenozoic Not ready
  21. Portal:Cincinnati Not ready
  22. Portal:Coatbridge Not ready
  23. Portal:Coimbatore Not ready
  24. Portal:Coke Studio (Pakistan) Not ready
  25. Portal:Cotton Not ready (mis-sized box at bottom)
  26. Portal:Crawley Not ready
  27. Portal:Dacia Not ready
  28. Portal:Dallas – Fort Worth Metroplex Not ready
  29. Portal:Daman and Diu Not ready
  30. Portal:David Guetta Not ready
  31. Portal:Derbyshire Not ready
  32. Portal:Education in Pakistan  Not done
  33. Portal:Flodden Not ready
  34. Portal:Football in Malaysia Not ready
  35. Portal:Football in the Philippines Not ready
  36. Portal:French language and French-speaking world Not ready
  37. Portal:French Polynesia Not ready
  38. Portal:Gemology and jewelry Not ready
  39. Portal:Grand Canyon Not ready
  40. Portal:Greenland Not ready
  41. Portal:Handball Not ready
  42. Portal:Hazardous materials Not ready
  43. Portal:Human health and performance in space Not ready (no "selected" sections)
  44. Portal:Human–computer interaction Not ready
  45. Portal:Indore Not ready
  46. Portal:Istanbul Not ready
  47. Portal:Jagadguru Rambhadracharya Not ready (headings and edit links are red)
  48. Portal:Jakarta Not ready
  49. Portal:Jersey Not ready
  50. Portal:K-pop Not ready
  51. Portal:Kalash Valleys Not ready
  52. Portal:Kandahar Not ready
  53. Portal:Kylie Minogue Not ready
  54. Portal:Laos Not ready
  55. Portal:Left-wing populism Not ready
  56. Portal:Lexa Not ready
  57. Portal:Liechtenstein Not ready
  58. Portal:Macaronesia ☒N News section if kept needs to be replaced by sections for the separate island groups
  59. Portal:Machine learning Not ready
  60. Portal:Magic: The Gathering Not ready
  61. Portal:Manila Not ready
  62. Portal:Mantodea Not ready
  63. Portal:Men in Black Not ready
  64. Portal:Mesozoic Not ready
  65. Portal:Minecraft Not ready
  66. Portal:Mizoram Not ready
  67. Portal:MMA Not ready
  68. Portal:MMA Not ready
  69. Portal:Monarchy Not ready
  70. Portal:Mosses Not ready
  71. Portal:Mughal Empire Not ready
  72. Portal:Muhammad Not ready
  73. Portal:National Basketball League (Australia) Not ready (no "selected" sections)
  74. Portal:New Caledonia Not ready
  75. Portal:New Spain Not ready (headings and edit links are red)
  76. Portal:Ottoman Empire Not ready
  77. Portal:Paleobotany Not ready
  78. Portal:Pendeli Not ready
  79. Portal:Philippine Law Not ready
  80. Portal:Prehistory of Africa Not ready
  81. Portal:Prehistory of Antarctica Not ready
  82. Portal:Prehistory of Asia Not ready
  83. Portal:Prehistory of Europe Not ready
  84. Portal:Prehistory of North America Not ready
  85. Portal:Prehistory of Oceania Not ready
  86. Portal:Prehistory of South America Not ready
  87. Portal:Pterosaurs Not ready
  88. Portal:Quantum computing Not ready
  89. Portal:Quidditch Not ready
  90. Portal:Quran Not ready
  91. Portal:Reggae music Not ready
  92. Portal:Reptiles Not ready
  93. Portal:Republika Srpska Not ready
  94. Portal:Rhetoric Not ready (formatting - columns way off-balance)
  95. Portal:Ryukyu Not ready
  96. Portal:Sacred Christian music Not ready
  97. Portal:Sarawak Not ready
  98. Portal:Savoy Not ready
  99. Portal:Seljuk Empire Not ready
  100. Portal:Shina Not ready
  101. Portal:Sikhism Not ready
  102. Portal:Smartphone Not ready
  103. Portal:Special operations Not ready
  104. Portal:Strictly Come Dancing Not ready
  105. Portal:Sydney Not ready
  106. Portal:Syrian Civil War Not ready
  107. Portal:Taipei Not ready
  108. Portal:Tamil Eelam Not ready
  109. Portal:Trace fossils Not ready (no "selected" sections)
  110. Portal:Turkish Armed Forces Not ready (no "selected" sections)
  111. Portal:Turkmenistan Not ready
  112. Portal:Ulcinj Not ready
  113. Portal:Universe Not ready
  114. Portal:Universities in Azerbaijan Not ready (headings and edit links are red)
  115. Portal:University of Montana Not ready
  116. Portal:Unix Not ready
  117. Portal:Webcomics Not ready
  118. Portal:Western Region (Ghana) Not ready
  119. Portal:Wikiatlas Not ready
  120. Portal:Women's history Not ready
  121. Portal:Years Not ready
  122. Portal:Yoga Not ready
  123. Portal:York Region, Ontario Not ready
  124. Portal:Zoos and aquariums Not ready

Non-portals

  1. Portal:Example ☒N Example portal, little need to be on the list.
  2. Portal:Football ☒N Not a portal, but a disambiguation page
  3. Portal:Georgia ☒N disambiguation page
  4. Portal:Human ☒N redirect
  5. Portal:Today's article for improvement ☒N Not a portal, but a test page for testing a template

Deleted

Many of the following were speedy deleted, due to being underpopulated (woefully incomplete); they were portal starts, that barely got started:

  1. Portal:Alsace
  2. Portal:Andaman and Nicobar Islands Not ready
  3. Portal:Bon Jovi
  4. Portal:Cider (speedy deleted)
  5. Portal:Construction (speedy deleted)
  6. Portal:Cricket World Cup (speedy deleted)
  7. Portal:Disco (speedy deleted)
  8. Portal:Eurypterids
  9. Portal:French Revolution
  10. Portal:Fulani (speedy deleted)
  11. Portal:Graptolites
  12. Portal:Guangzhou
  13. Portal:India–Pakistan relations Not ready
  14. Portal:Indigenous languages of Australia (speedy deleted)
  15. Portal:Irem - needs selected article and selected picture Not ready
  16. Portal:Konami (speedy deleted)
  17. Portal:Laser (speedy deleted)
  18. Portal:Lorraine
  19. Portal:Mainframe computers ☒N (marked for speedy deletion - empty)
  20. Portal:Mandatory Palestine
  21. Portal:Manipur (speedy deleted)
  22. Portal:Mayotte (speedy deleted)
  23. Portal:Mercosur
  24. Portal:Military of Bangladesh
  25. Portal:Military of India
  26. Portal:Military of Pakistan
  27. Portal:Military of Republic of India
  28. Portal:Mithila (speedy deleted)
  29. Portal:Norman Mailer (speedy deleted)
  30. Portal:Philippine Basketball Association Not ready
  31. Portal:Premier League (speedy deleted)
  32. Portal:Prisons (speedy deleted)
  33. Portal:Procedural Animation ☒N (marked for speedy deletion - empty)
  34. Portal:Public Administration (speedy deleted)
  35. Portal:Rabwah (speedy deleted)
  36. Portal:Social welfare and social work Not ready
  37. Portal:Spanish Philippines (speedy deleted)
  38. Portal:Supercentenarians (speedy deleted)
  39. Portal:Televisa (speedy deleted)
  40. Portal:Tripura (speedy deleted)
  41. Portal:Twenty One Pilots (speedy deleted)
  42. Portal:United States Territories (speedy deleted)
  43. Portal:Uttarakhand (speedy deleted)
  44. Portal:Yerevan (speedy deleted)

These (the unmarked ones on the uppermost list above) are missing from the adjacent page, and need to be added there. All help is appreciated. Mark each as  Done after it is inserted. Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   08:42, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

It is best not to list non-portals as portals. The disambiguation pages don't hurt anything if they are not listed.    — The Transhumanist   23:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

Portal:European military history

In the history section, I wonder if this would be better listed under War than under History by region - (other portals like Portal:Military history of Africa are in the latter group). Dunarc (talk) 22:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

RFC on layout update

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the discussion.

Proposer blocked, as sock puppet of an LTA (long-term abuser).    — The Transhumanist   05:17, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

rfcid=AB9CCA5 Withdrawn (see "closing" below). JLJ001 (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Should be Portal:Contents/Portals be replaced with the layout at Portal:Contents/Portals (new)?

Proposer: JLJ001 (talk) 16:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

Important note: It is good to take the initiative, and I hope that you keep doing so. The current community consensus is that this page is part of a set of navigation pages, each page sharing the same formatting. To change the formatting of this page, you need to establish a new consensus to change the formatting of the set (such as having a new standard design, or different designs for each or any of the pages). The members of the set are Portal:Contents/Overviews, Portal:Contents/Outlines, Portal:Contents/Lists, Portal:Contents/Portals, Portal:Contents/Glossaries, Portal:Contents/Categories, and Portal:Contents/Indices. This discussion is fine, as long as it is announced to the wider community, such as at Portal talk:Contents, the talk pages of all the pages included in the set, the talk pages of their corresponding WikiProjects, the CBB, and Wikipedia:Centralized discussion. If the format of this page is changed without proper notification of this discussion to the wider community, someone will likely be shocked by the mismatch and quickly revert it, pointing out that the prior wider consensus still stands. Just a heads up. Keep up the innovation!    — The Transhumanist   21:42, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Closing I originally planned just to change the layout of [[this one page, to something along the lines of my proposed new layout, which includes design features that have been generally mentioned here and there. However some people have expressed concerns about the design which lead me to consider that additional "wishlist" input could be beneficial. Check out this mockup, an improved design does not have to be this improved design. Additionally I was not aware initially that it would necessary to redesign the entire layout of Portal:Contents, which is understandably a bigger job, which I have not yet prepared anything for. Therefore I will quickly close this RfC and open another one on Portal talk:Contents to get design input. JLJ001 (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Survey

Discussion

  • Perhaps a quick summary of the changes and the provided benefits is in order? Just for the record, I like the new one. — AfroThundr (talk) 16:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
    • Short explanation is that it's exactly the same except the icons at the top are now really big.
Everything works exactly as before, even the icons are using the same pictures, so for editors there is no change. For readers it is more accessible. The advantage of this layout is that people can easily see the options, rather like the home screen of any modern OS. This is to improve usability, and hopefully get more people to continue on to visit a portal rather than getting bored and clicking away. JLJ001 (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

fine tunning "Religion and belief systems" portal section

Under major headings of Abrahamic religions, Non-Abrahamic religions, Other and Non Religion or Belief there is some inconsistenty compared with Portal:Contents/Religion_and_belief_systems and Abrahamic religions. The Bábism and Bahá'í Faith religions are linked as "Religions with West Asian origin" with Zoroastrianism. Both are more often linked as Abrahamic though in some definitions they transcend the traditional boundaries of Abrahamic (more specifically the Baha'i Faith since it explicitly accepts the divine origin of Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism and there is some case for accepting individuals from Native American religious history.) Thoughts? Smkolins (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

@Smkolins: Good spot. I'd say we should obliterate the 'West Asian origin' section; it's a rather odd grouping. Then merge Bahai and Babism into Abrahamic, and put ZA into 'other religions'. Cesdeva (talk) 19:05, 1 June 2018 (UTC)