Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 343

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 340Archive 341Archive 342Archive 343Archive 344Archive 345→Archive 350

Faizullah_Arain

Took a deep look before editing this article as he a notable celebrity, its not converting advertising, someone deleted this page for harming his reputation or mistakenly . Kindly take a look at this and restore it —Davidvoki (talk) 21:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

@Davidvoki: The most recent deletion of this page was at the author's request. That said, the most recent version of this page was moved to Draft:Faizullah Arain. Please work on it there and submit after it meets standards. —C.Fred (talk) 22:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Davidvoki - Are you a paid editor and/or do you have any conflict of interest to declare? --kingboyk (talk) 22:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kingboyk: No I am not the paid editor, I am wikipedia contributor, Although I found this topic interesting and eligible so I wrote article about him, aswell I am the author of it and its ready for mainspace.
OK, Davidvoki, thank you for the reply. As you should now be aware, the draft is at Draft:Faizullah Arain. I have submitted it for review, on your behalf. You will need to wait for a reviewer and this may take some weeks. That gives you plenty of time to finish off any loose ends! If you have any further questions, please ask at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk and not here, as here we only deal with deleted content. --kingboyk (talk) 01:51, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@C.Fred: Author requested the deletion before under R2 long time ago and that issue was fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidvoki (talk • contribs) 00:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@Davidvoki: Oh, yeah, I see where that was restored. At any rate, the article has been moved to draft space, and this is not the place to request review of an article for a move to mainspace. Please work on the draft and submit it when it's ready. —C.Fred (talk) 00:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Done Article is in draft space and awaits AfC review. --kingboyk (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

@C.Fred and Kingboyk: (Non-administrator comment) FYI, Davidvoki waited three whole hours before moving it back to mainspace himself with no substantial changes from the version that was previously draftified. --Finngall talk 16:30, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Blocked The requesting user has since been blocked by another admin and the article deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 and G11. cc User:Finngall. --kingboyk (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

@Finngall and Kingboyk: I was searching for computer Scientist Faizullah Arain and saw that the article has been deleted so kindly have a look at the order and restore it.

You Deserve a Love

This film was in competition at the 2019 Cannes Festival (Golden Camera and Queer Palm), then in Angoulême Festival (where it won an award for best direction) and will be released in France on September 11 (and already shown in premieres in several cinemas). --TwøWiñgš Talk to me 17:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC) —TwøWiñgš Talk to me 17:31, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

article name placed into template (Non-administrator comment) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 17:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

It was deleted under G5 but the content seems innocuous. Pinging User:Yunshui (deleting admin). --kingboyk (talk) 17:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

  • @TwoWings: it was deleted because the person who wrote it is banned and isn't allowed to edit Wikipedia. That doesn't stop anyone who isn't banned from rewriting it. There was very little actual content, two sentences of prose, a cast listing and an infobox, the sources cited were [1] and [2]. Hut 8.5 17:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Darby House (Baldwin, Louisiana)

I, Wells2123, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wells2123 (talk) 18:48, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Merged duplicate requests for same article by same user. Comment on second request follows: (Non-administrator comment) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 19:28, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

I wish to rewrite the article —Wells2123 (talk) 18:54, 30 August 2019 (UTC)}}

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 19:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG

Please restore this redirect since the validity of this being deleted per WP:G6 is disputable per WP:FILEREDIRECT since this redirect was a {{R from move}}. (Most likely Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 26#File:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG will have to be reopened if this redirect is restored, and I shall participate there.) —Steel1943 (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

User:Steel1943 This venue is for requesting the restoration of abandoned drafts and other refundable useful material and not for challenging admin actions per se. Absent any rationale, I'm struggling to see how undeleting this redirect would benefit the encyclopedia.
Per the guidance at the top of the page: If you feel an administrator (in this case User:Athaenara) has erred in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here. -kingboyk (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Deletion review for a page deleted for an "cleanup"/"technical"-type speedy deletion criterion? I'm sorry, but I'm not understanding your rationale behind denying this request, nor do you seem neutral in your stance regarding this page per you stating "Absent any rationale, I'm struggling to see how undeleting this redirect would benefit the encyclopedia", and that opinion you shared would be better presented in a deletion discussion. (Also, I did provide rationale: As I had stated, see WP:FILEREDIRECT.) Per the instructions on this page, requesting restorations for pages speedy deleted for uncontroversial speedy deletion reasons, such as WP:G6, is a valid request and doesn't necessarily need to go through the deleting administrator. Yes, the administrator you mentioned referenced the discussion in their close, but they did not delete the redirect as a result of that discussion, but rather per a "cleanup"/"technical" speedy deletion criterion. So ... again, I am having difficulty understanding why there is hesitation with restoring this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm sorry if you didn't appreciate my response. I'm just a volunteer trying to do my best for the project, and I try not to invite conflict. So, if you'd allow me to explain my both my thinking at the time and my thoughts upon reading and digesting your reply then perhaps we can put the matter to rest since Hut 8.5 has restored the redirect.
I didn't deny the request (that gets a bit shouty red checkmark); rather I expressed reticence.
  • I was and remain puzzled as to why we need this redirect and why it's not better left deleted. Generally folks requesting here explain why they want the page or other entity undeleted, not why it shouldn't have been deleted in the first place. You mentioned reopening the RfD; perhaps I should have undeleted and suggested you do just that. Hopefully I'll get to hear more about why we need the redirect in the resurrected RfD.
  • Your rationale appeared to me to be a challenge to the deletion. I don't understand what is unclear about "If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here."
  • However, you and Hut 8.5 are correct - maintenance deletions are listed as refundable. Unfortunately, "G6" isn't mentioned on this page at all, so I didn't consider that it might be refundable just because you insist on it. I will rectify the omission with an edit in a moment.
  • Ultimately, analysing a request and the nuances which sometimes arise (as here) come down to administrator discretion. Indeed, the instructions say "These are the recommended guidelines for administrators evaluating requests for undeletion. They are not binding, and administrators are, as always, encouraged to use discretion and common sense when fulfilling requests."
  • I was hoping you'd come back with a reason why it should be undeleted, or that the deleting admin would appear to resolve the issue.
I hope that has cleared up any confusion about my reply and the thinking behind it. --kingboyk (talk) 21:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Update: The RfD has been reopened and I have read and understood the rationale. Thanks for that. --kingboyk (talk) 21:42, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@Kingboyk: We are all volunteers here, obviously, and I have no hard feelings about this, and I hope you don't either. This is almost a bit of a hobby for all of us, and learning all perspectives keeps me up-to-date on what I think makes sense or is ethical on here. Everyone has their own opinion on this, and sometimes it causes heads to butt. Anyways, hope all is well, and I get it ... I'm still learning process on here, and I've been editing for almost a decade now. (100,000+ edits.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
@Steel1943: Thanks, I'm glad we were able to clear that up without any hard feelings. I know (and knew without looking) that you're an old hand here, as I recognised the username. Actually I wondered if we'd crossed paths on a WikiProject, but I can't find any connection - I've probably seen you around in the "for discussion" areas or something :) I was very very active up until 2008, and then was-semi retired for a while. Right: enough reminiscing; thanks for the nice reply and I'll see you around. --kingboyk (talk) 22:02, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Albert Cashier

I, Mathglot, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mathglot (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

A better location is as a userspace draft, e.g. User:Mathglot/Albert Cashier, but I can move it there myself if restored to Draft space. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:06, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 00:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

I've done that as requested, but note there's a similar article already in mainspace at Albert Cashier. Will look into it. --kingboyk (talk) 00:57, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
They're not identical. The published version appears to be more extensive. --kingboyk (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Talent Recap Awards

I, Wikiqueen012019, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wikiqueen012019 (talk) 13:34, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Huang Renjun

I, Jenoly, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jenoly (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. kingboyk (talk) 16:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lee Jeno

I, Jenoly, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jenoly (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. kingboyk (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Marian Drenceanu

I, Gabinho, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gabinho>:) 23:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Phonetix

I, Dasexybeast, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dasexybeast (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 00:56, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Mummy the Ride.jpg

I nominated the Commons copy of the file for deletion due to copyright issues. If the local copy survives, then that's great, so it should be un-deleted. —George Ho (talk) 00:19, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Done kingboyk (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
@George Ho: Please ensure that the copyright notices etc on the restored version are correct and that the file is eligible to be used here (I had quick look at what you've done on Commons and it seems you have rationale ready). Thanks. --kingboyk (talk) 01:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Omar Hosari

I, Lilycha, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lilycha (talk) 07:17, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Merged two requests for same article from same user. Second comment follows: ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

this is an existing person and renowned CEO in trip support industry —Lilycha (talk) 07:26, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 15:14, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ronald Schoenherr

I, Nolan Perry, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. -- - Nolan Perry Yell at me! 17:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jens Fuglsang

I, Nikolagoettsche, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nikolagoettsche (talk) 17:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

ThePrint

I, Djm-leighpark, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Djm-leighpark (talk) 17:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

No problem. I fixed the request so that the script we use will work. --kingboyk (talk) 18:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Forgotten Empires

I, Spy-cicle, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spy-cicle (talk) 20:24, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Irequest the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. kingboyk (talk) 20:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Micah_McGee

{{subst:refund|1= Micah_McGee |2= three reasons, autobiographical 2.0 like i see other people of fame, note or ability, wikipedia has a social media aspect to it and i know of other 'Micah McGee's'}. The term 'patent nonsense' is a default programming term to strike down the beginning of a new page, the side-corporeal guidelines of meaningless or incomprehensible, could you please misjudge?

Otherwise, i see my contribution to wikipedia to affect other primal pages drafts.

Thanks

Draft:Depredation permit

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Deep City Records

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tina Martin (television host)

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Duvall Decker

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Vivian Rushmore

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dick Barrow

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Moncrief Park

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Uwe Michael Lang

I, Villa Cratonis, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Villa Cratonis (talk) 08:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 09:27, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Measurable Outcomes

I want to update the page to make it clearer. This subject is gaining traction across the world as a business technique and I don't think the reviewer understood this. I need more time to make this clear. —Terrybenge (talk) 10:29, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Asmodeus Psychobilly Band

I, Skitzoko, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Skitzoko (talk) 13:32, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Nesrine Malik

More notability in recent years; for example, has been mentioned by Peter Oborne in the British Journalism Review as part of a new generation of Muslim journalists. Nominated for the Orwell Prize in 2019. —Bangalamania (talk) 13:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Spyros_Filippou

I, Sfilip9, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sfilip9 (talk) 20:03, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jeremy Holm

I, Keithmorrill, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keithmorrill (talk) 20:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Heather Kemesky

I don’t normally ask for my drafts to be undeleted because I don’t abandon them, some just get lost in the cracks when you have a bunch of them. This is that scenario. —Trillfendi (talk) 22:24, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Arjoccolenty/fire alarms

I was working on that page when it and all of the other files that I had got deleted. I did not know that you couldn't use Wikipedia as a web host for files and I had no clue that they were being deleted. I thought I could use it as a sandbox. If I can't get the file back, can I at least get the contents? I won't remake it on Wikipedia again. Arjoccolenty (talk) 01:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC) —Arjoccolenty (talk) 01:46, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

 Done the contents of this file were:
https://forums.thefirepanel.com/viewtopic.php?p=26777#p26777
Simplex 2901-9833+2903-9101
Simplex 2901-9846+4903-9105
Simplex 2901-9806+4903-9101
Edwards 892-2B
SpectrAlert Classic
Wheelock ZNS

Remember this is an encyclopedia! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

105.112.96.196 req

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 105.112.96.196 (talk) 10:33, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

You are going to have to tell us what you want before we do anything. as you have no deleted contributions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

The Divine Equation & The Holy Temple

I, The Divine Equation, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The Divine Equation (talk) 04:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Merged two requests for same article from same user. Second comment follows: ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

I will appreciate if you can allow me more time for additional editing. —The Divine Equation (talk) 04:46, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tha Boogie Bandit

I, Buhrmi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Buhrmi (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

@Hut 8.5: it looks like this page was g13’ed again a few hours after you restored it McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 12:27, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Apologies, I must have forgotten to remove the deletion tag. Hut 8.5 18:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

The eminent Lubabalo Tybosch

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —TheHoneymustard (talk) 20:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC) A file that was posted has been removed

Not done Can't find anything in main space nor draft space, with or without "The eminent", nor are there any deleted contributions from your account. kingboyk (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
He's asking about a file deleted on Commons, based on his global account logs (1 edit here, 4 on Commons). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 22:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

2020 Democratic Party presidential rallies

I would like this page to be restored to User:Squeeps10/2020 Democratic Party presidential rallies. I'd like to use some of the content's of the article at Draft:Michael Bennet 2020 presidential campaign, after which I would likely CSD this page. Thanks! Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 01:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC) —Squeeps10 Talk to meMy edits 01:24, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Squeeps10:  Done For next time, it's probably easier to ask the deleting admin first, and to post here only if they are unavailable. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:A Midnight Visit

I was writing this article to be published, but then became very distracted with other matters and forgot about it. Please restore, and I will get to work on making it live :) and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Prendiecat (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Proof of Kleiman's theorem

G13; still needed —Taku (talk) 02:41, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Meld Magazine

I, Fariwu, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fariwu (talk) 09:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


Best Regards (Buckethead album)

I don’t know why the page was deleted and am trying to figure out why. I would like for it to be reinstated please. Thanks!!! https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizjW3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/Best_Regards_(Buckethead_album).html —MusicManager888 (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@MusicManager888: The article was not deleted; however, it was turned into a redirect to Buckethead discography because it is not a notable album. Given the minimal information and sourcing, I endorse that decision. If you think an article should be written about the album, please discuss at Talk:Buckethead or Talk:Buckethead discography; make sure you describe how the album is now notable per our requirements. —C.Fred (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Fatty Koo

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Briqmedia (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC) The Music Group Fatty Koo was deleted in November of 2016 on the grounds that the music group was not a charting group and only had a group website. For starters the individual who filed this motion has been permanently banned from the Wikipedia. According to billboard.com, Fatty Koo peaked at #64 on the billboard top 100 charts in 2005. https://www.billboard.com/music/fatty-koo On Wikipedia, Fatty Koo is listed on music producer Toby Gad's page as well as R&B Pop Star Miguel's page. They are also on wiki sites such as: Music of Ohio and List of Keys to the City in the United States; Fatty Koo earned the Key to the City of Columbus, OH on May 26, 2005. Please restore this page and allow for proper updates to be made to the band wiki page to reflect their musical achievements. Adding the admin who deleted the page @MBisanz

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatty Koo, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
@Briqmedia: If you think they are notable now in ways they weren't three years ago, you can create a draft of a new article at Draft:Fatty Koo, and we can see if the problems identified in the AfD have been overcome. —C.Fred (talk) 19:14, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Missoula Art Museum

Review and correct copyright infringements to restore the page properly —Missoula Art Museum 16:51, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done – Missoulaartmuseum, that page was (correctly) deleted as a copyright violation, and cannot be restored. You can if you wish go through the procedure described here, but promotional content of that sort is in any case not suitable for an encyclopaedia and there is very little chance that it would be used. If you want to create an article on the topic, your first step is to identify a good number of independent reliable sources that discuss the museum in depth and in detail, and then base your content on what they say. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)
Clarify: by "that page" I mean of course User:Missoulaartmuseum, which is what I assume you are actually asking us to restore? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:27, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Ugla'a/sandbox

I truly hadn't realized what I was doing was wrong, and I used my sandbox for little projects that I would create. I now know that I'm not allowed to do this here, and I'd like to move to another website. However, everything was lost, I had not backed up anything. I would like the most recent edit of my page, please :( —Ugla'a (talk) 19:21, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Benjamin Onoriode Irikefe

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Donpheart (talk) 10:49, 5 September 2019 (UTC) I wish to continue to work on the page to that it will be published

223.181.30.133

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 223.181.30.133 (talk) 06:58, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

223.181.30.133 you will have to tell us what you want as there are no deleted contributions for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:12, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:The World to Come

I, Rusted AutoParts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rusted AutoParts 02:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Otto Schulz (1911–1942).jpg

File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when article Otto Schulz was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 19:42, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Eurokars Group

I, Peirceong, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peirceong (talk) 13:13, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ponnurangam Kumaraguru ("PK")

I, Prateekdewan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Prateekdewan (talk) 13:48, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Vassil_Bojkov_Collection

This article was very informative and useful. A lot of useful information written by curators and professors of Thracian Archeology and art had been deleted. The article had interesting facts about a lot of artifacts from Vassil Bojkov's collection. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim19finsbury (talk • contribs) —— RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:16, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Whitefield Academy -Lions Sports Logo.png

Apparently not correctly included at Whitefield Academy (Missouri) when it was deleted. I believe I have it fixed. —2605:A601:AE21:EB00:6CD8:AB3D:2273:E555 (talk) 02:08, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

girdhar swami

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —203.76.183.124 (talk) 11:31, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Articles for deletion/Girdhar swami, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Blanking the AFD will not help this come back. Also Girdhar Swami was deleted because of creation by a banned user. If you are Mediapartner111, you are not permitted to edit here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Awareness Intelligence

I, 106.210.139.44, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 106.210.139.44 (talk) 17:35, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Soundform

I, Юрій Кріль, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Юрій Кріль (talk) 14:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Practical Senses

I, Юрій Кріль, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Юрій Кріль (talk) 14:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

File:ERG2016 cover.png

Preparing for move to Commons, will also revert to the larger image. The file had been incorrectly classified as fair use, resulting in deleted version preventing the move. It is in fact PD. I have an email from the United States Dept. Of Transport confirming this I can send over to Permissions/OTRS. Text from said email:

"ERG2016 (PHH50-ERG2016) is not copyrighted and may be reproduced without further permission subject to the following:
The names and the seals of the participating governments may not be reproduced on a copy of this document unless that copy accurately reproduces the entire content (text, format, and coloration) of this document without modification.
In addition, the publisher's full name and address must be displayed on the outside back cover of each copy, replacing the wording placed on the center of the back cover."

(@Graeme Bartlett: - who was on the previous request that timed out due to a delay in getting a reply from USDOT.)--The Navigators (talk) 00:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC) —The Navigators (talk) 00:23, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, now moved to Commons. Do you want me to send over that email to permissions, @Graeme Bartlett:?--The Navigators (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
You may as well send it. They say they don't accept forwarded emails, but I have done it before. But there is enough suspicion of public domain, so hopefully it will not be contested. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:23, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Fahim Safar

I, 2405:204:D000:F1AC:A11A:C61F:95D1:16EB, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2405:204:D000:F1AC:A11A:C61F:95D1:16EB (talk) 18:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ambroy

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ambroy Meyhem (talk) 12:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Requestor has been indef'd as a spam/advertising-only account. --Finngall talk 17:36, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
Not done per the above. Hut 8.5 10:42, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Sara_Thornton_(weather_forecaster)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —LonWriter (talk) 10:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC) Deleted maliciously

Furthermore I don't see any evidence that this was "deleted maliciously" as claimed. Hut 8.5 10:48, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Iraq war

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —5.22.125.248 (talk) 10:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Uzzyefizzy

I uzzyefizzy request for the restoration of this page under CSD U3, The information on this page is genuine and true " —Uzzyefizzy (talk) 17:40, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done – a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Mercy Ngozi Alu

This is a singer who is featured on television and other media channels in Africa. there are magazine articles and other media, book etc to verify notability. if this article was not well written it could be rewirttten. but the article should not be deleted.—2601:246:5980:7A80:7C3D:8BD:72A2:8C24 (talk) 20:06, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

DJ IcyFunk

I, Apardue, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Apardue (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Small Boss

I, 173.52.103.134, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 173.52.103.134 (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


See the following draft, the article has not existed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Small Boss

I, Smallbossmc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smallbossmc (talk) 06:03, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

"Draft:Richie Goods"

I, Sandralj, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sandralj (talk) 02:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Another Day, Another Time: Celebrating the music of "Inside Llewyn Davis"

I, Bwichd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bwichd (talk) 03:26, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Keng-Fu Lo

I, Annahua, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Annahua (talk) 05:11, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Eric Brodkowitz

He actually at least now meets WP:NBASE (participated in a major international competition (such as the World Baseball Classic, Baseball World Cup or Olympics) as a member of a national team) - he just this week was the starting pitcher in the 2019 European Baseball Championship for Team Israel.[4] The European Baseball Championship is the main championship tournament between national baseball teams in Europe. I would like to have his page restored. It is of interest to those following the championship. The prodder sent me here. Thanks. —2604:2000:E010:1100:78E6:E15F:7C6C:DD97 (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

OpenRaster

Missed the AfD notice and would have liked to look into it a bit. Closer said that WP:REFUND is applicable. —Ahiijny (talk) 18:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Day convolution

I, Mroman42, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mroman42 (talk) 18:56, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Coast Mountain Academy

I, Evangsharp, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Evangsharp (talk) 17:09, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:OneDayOnly.co.za

I, Mauritsv, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mauritsv (talk) 12:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:K-groups of a field

G13; still not covered in mainspace. —Taku (talk) 03:11, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @TakuyaMurata: given the sheer number of times this has been deleted and restored I'd suggest moving it to your userspace. Hut 8.5 06:48, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kawga

I, 169.149.211.30, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 169.149.211.30 (talk) 08:23, 10 September 2019 (UTC)


Draft:Kawga has been removed without mentioning and giving us suggestion. I'm working from so long to put "KAWGA" on wiki and some deleting administrator are obstacles in my works, so i beg that please review my "Draft:Kawga". I'll very thankfull for your kindness. and then click the "Publish changes" button below —169.149.245.124 (talk) 08:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. There was actually notification here User talk:Anirudh 2057. Feedback: it would help if you found some writings about Kawga to use as references. Are there newspapers? Does it have census, climate or election results available? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:53, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Olamide Zaccheaus

I created the page for Zaccheaus because he made the Atlanta Falcons 53 man roster and I had all of his information and I cited references to be so the page would have adequate information about him. Im not sure why it was deleted I did not get a explanation or nothing from nobody. The page wasn't of a fake or made up person this is a legit NFL player. I have made pages before for NFL players for example I created the Atlanta Falcons recent draft pick cornerback Jordan Miller's wiki page and it didn't get deleted and I had less information on him. I took my free time out of my day to try to make my boy a page so he can be recognized. If it has to stay deleted I would like to know why. Also if I need to sure up anything I am willing I would just like the page to not be deleted. I intend to keep working on the page as much as possible. —Falcaholic (talk) 10:34, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Not done given the reason for deletion you will need to speak to the deleting admin (User:331dot) or use deletion review. While I know very little about American Football, the reason this was originally deleted was that he hadn't actually played in any NFL games, he'd only been drafted. If he has actually played a game by now then we should be able to have an article on him. Hut 8.5 17:47, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
The season starts this coming weekend, so he has not played in a game yet. 331dot (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
I had created him a page in May but he hadn't made the roster that is the reason you see it was delted. I understand why it was deleted because he was undrafted and he could of never made an NFL roster. I came back this month in September when I found out he made the roster and created him a page and now I don't understand why he cannot have a page (User:Scott Burley) did nit give a logical reasoning of why it was deleted. There a plenty of wiki pages of NFL players that have never recorded a stat in the NFL or never played a game. He made the roster their are pratice squad player with wiki pages. I would just like you to investigate the users wrong doing because the information that was on the page is legit. It was put up for speedy deletion before I could even get an explanation. The 1st time i created the page it was just a proposed deletion and I understood why. If I cant get a full undeletion yet can I at least get a temporary one until I can find out the reasoning behind the deletion. —Falcaholic (talk) 20:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Falcahoilc Merely being on the team roster does not meet the notability criteria; he must appear in a regular season or playoff game. Alternatively, if there is extensive coverage of him as a person for some other reason, he could meet the general notability criteria, but this seems unlkely. As I said on my talk page, if he appears in the Falcons' game this Sunday, I would be happy to restore the article. 331dot (talk) 12:19, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
The G4 delete was clearly wrong as the article was very different. However it would probably sink under another AFD unless he actually appears in play in a fully professional regular game. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:24, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Did the subject play this weekend? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

User:SPMCc88

I did not inform myself very well when writing my first article on where it is to be placed. When i found out where I was supposed to create my article, I had failed to remove the text from my page, consequently having the same information on a deleted article and my page led to deletion of my user page. I have been doing my research and have been advised by several experienced editors on how to properly use Wikipedia and appreciate all the sources they've shared. I am requesting that my page be reinstated based on an honest mistake and pure ignorance. —SPMCC88 (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)--SPMCC88 (talk) 20:07, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately your userpage cannot be restored by admins since it's oversighted. I don't know why it was oversighted, but one thing clear is that any content worthy of oversighting cannot be hosted anywhere on Wikipedia. So I will advise you to contact oversighters directly at Special:EmailUser/Oversight to see if there's possibility of you getting the content off wiki. – Ammarpad (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
WP:Oversight, to explain what Ammarpad means by "oversighted". —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 19:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of Dragonheart characters

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) ZorahErso (talk) 13:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Portal:Nanotechnology

WP:NOQUORUM. The page was deleted with only two !votes based on the mistaken assertion that the portal was abandoned, without any notification to the maintainer. REFUND is the proper venue for "deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator," as stated at the top of this page. According to NOQUORUM, these pages are equivalent to an expired PROD and can be restored by any administrator upon request.

Upon undeletion I will promptly fix the issues with outdated information raised in the deletion discussion. This request includes Portal:Nanotechnology, its subpages, and Template:Nanotech selected. —Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 15:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Nanotechnology, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, MER-C (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
  • The creator was notified here: User talk:Rama's Arrow. Three people voted to delete, and the debate was not closed as soft-delete as you suggest. But you can talk to the deleting admin. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Oohs N Coos

I, Jabayie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Oohs N coos 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Malopoets

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —James MacBryde (talk) 07:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC) Malopoets are a seven piece musical band that published their first LP record in 1985 on EMI America Records, a division of Capitol Records Inc.

For the fact that they are published artists (objective) and oustanding musicians (subjective) they deserve a page on this site.

I attempted to set up such a page but due to my inability to master the intricacies of the format the page was deleted by a user.

According to the Wiki page on "notability", a group must have had at least "two or more albums on a major record label". The group in question have produced three albums on major record labels as well as numerous songs appearing on compilation records. There is no need to contest the group's significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James MacBryde (talk • contribs) 21:22, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Edwin H. Land Medal

I do not think this new article should have been summarily deleted. There are many awards and medals given by The Optical Society (OSA); only about half of these have been given Wiki pages so far, clearly a work in progress. This one lived for a single day before citations and references could be added. Why not delete all the OSA award wiki articles? Why focus on this one arbitrarily? —136.49.47.230 (talk) 01:05, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Oohs N Coos (2)

I, Jabayie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Oohs N coos 13:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

This was already done above. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 18:04, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Clinton Body Count

This article contained substantial information about the nature and scope of coordinated conspiracy theories and smear campaigns against US politicians and bears on the history of Bill & Hillary Clinton's political careers. It's important to be able to refer to these tactics in understanding current and future campaigns of this nature. —Willo0olliw (talk) 20:42, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

It already exists as Clinton Body Count (conspiracy theory). Praxidicae (talk) 20:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Not done there is no meaningful deleted history at this title, the only deleted version is a redirect to Clinton Body Count (conspiracy theory). Hut 8.5 20:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Canuck the Crow

I, Grayfell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Grayfell (talk) 05:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

"The Association of African Business Schools"

G13: Abandoned draft or AfC submission and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Dickel1 (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Note this draft was so promotional I've just removed most of it. Hut 8.5 21:06, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Jonathan Halevy

I, Djw2000, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Djw2000 (talk) 07:56, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:ASA Philippines Foundation, Inc

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kristopher 08:45, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:UT Tyler University Academy

I, Mitchellacampbell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mitchell Campbell (talk) 13:48, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Coherency (homotopy theory)

G13; still not covered in mainspace —Taku (talk) 20:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Clean Air Action Group

I, Zimmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zimmy (talk) 23:29, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tiffany Yu

I, Sktai391, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sktai391 (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Residual intersection

G13; need to be finished and merged back not deleted. —Taku (talk) 03:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Paracosma Inc.

I, Sujit.jha3, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PipeLine 03:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ashwin Vinayagamoorthy

I, Kausthub Ravi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kausthub Ravi (talk) 06:09, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


Hi I was unaware of the fact that an article would be removed if not worked on for 6 months. This is on me and I would like to work further on the Draft:Ashwin Vinayagamoorthy and get it approved by providing stronger reliable resources. I shall do this promptly and I request you to give me access to the deleted page. Thank you! —Kausthub Ravi (talk) 06:13, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

CSD G13

I, Nh-expera, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nh-expera (talk) 10:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Acton Cricket Club

I, Sk151090, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sk151090 (talk) 11:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Julian Penniston-Hill

The article was deleted on 5 September 2019 as the result of an expired PROD. The concern was that the article did not meet notability requirements. The PROD was not objected to in time but the article should be undeleted. The article meets notability requirements and cited independent news sources. —Peartree82 (talk) 12:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal No. 15

I, MHS the Railfan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MHS the Railfan (talk) 15:30, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Nancy Navarro

I would like the code "userfied ... so the content can be improved upon" and placed here: User talk:Evrik/draft2.

The information is here: the information is on the web ("Nancy Navarro". wikimili.com.). The person was deemed non-notable and the admin, Ad Orientem, will not give me the code. —--evrik (talk) 17:26, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cemeteries in Kenya

Category was deleted "as empty". There is content there now. User talk:VegaDark VegaDark is not active right now. —--evrik (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

GridStream Productions

The radio station is licensed by SOCAN via Torontocast and the station has historical value among internet only radio stations. Lack of sources is agreed upon but "I" can not fix this due to conflict of interest (I'm one of the guys that run the radio station), the station was mentioned in a printed magazine but I do not have a copy of that, the station has been mentioned in press releases by the game company Funcom. The station has broadcast since May 2002, that's longer than any still broadcasting internet mmo stations/possibly one of the oldest internet stations in general as well and has been licensed (legal) and thus paid royalties to PROs in the US or Canada through most of it's life, so the delete claim of not being licensed is untrue. If a lack of journalistic interest is cause for deleting wiki articles then that is a tad distressing. We'd be happy to assist in improving the article quality but we can't do it directly as that would fall under original research, we could start a campaign with our listeners to reach out to the media, but I'm unsure if such would also violate wiki regulations. —Gridfan (talk) 14:54, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Ping User:Tdl1060 as the PROD tagger. Note that Wikipedia article subjects need to be notable, and the usual way of showing this is by provding source coverage. That doesn't have to be by journalists but a press release would likely not be sufficient. Hut 8.5 21:32, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Arslan Ash

want to edit "Publish changes" button below —Samigoraya (talk) 22:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

 Not done We don't restore copyright infringements here take a look at http://picdeer.org/tag/ougaming and https://gulfnews.com/world/asia/pakistan/pakistani-gamer-taking-the-tekken-world-by-storm-1.65711700 but don't copy text. You can recreate by using your own words. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Arslan Ash

want to edit "Publish changes" button below —Samigoraya (talk) 22:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Chiharu Okunugi

I didn’t “abandon” it per se, FWIW. —Trillfendi (talk) 02:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Grist (thought leadership agency)

I, 185.159.79.156, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 185.159.79.156 (talk) 08:49, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lillee Jean Trueman

I, Mattm80 request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —76.112.176.111 (talk) 12:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Ameba TV

This is an information page for the 1st and longest running streaming service devoted just for children. There are numerous other entries for similar services. References cited are all from top publications in the field of children's entertainment and media. —184.69.39.234 (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Example

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 179.187.140.195 (talk) 16:00, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Moxie (band)

I thought it would become an official page, not be deleted —GabeBradshaw (talk) 17:38, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hiandra Martinez

I'll take this one back too —Trillfendi (talk) 19:06, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alan Turing Cryptography Competition

I, Pahunkat, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pahunkat (talk) 08:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kwak Sang-hoon

I, Ericgyuminchoi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ericgyuminchoi (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Terissa Kelton

I, 76.89.243.88, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.89.243.88 (talk) 21:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

File:TheSuicideSquadLogo.png

Not a copyright violation. The image is far too simple to fall under copyright; it's literally just words with a few holes in them. For precedence, File:Sonic Runners logo.png (a similar image) was nominated for deletion under copyright grounds but kept due to its simplicity. JOEBRO64 02:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC) —JOEBRO64 02:02, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion F9. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Fastily (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:04, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Did you even read my rationale? I (no joke) just explained how it's not a copyright violation and even provided an example of a similar image to prove it's not. JOEBRO64 02:08, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
F9s are explicitly not restored here even if you believe the tag is inapplicable. You need to make your case at deletion review or with the deleting administrator. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 03:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
As already explained: It is a logo with colouring and design features; i.e. the "bullet holes", not just plain circular holes. That already makes it not simple geometric shapes. See files like File:Once Upon A Time logo.svg and File:The End of the F***ing World logo.png for valid examples. -- /Alex/21 07:25, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Bullshit. Colors and holes does not make it original. I honestly have no idea how you guys can't see that, especially when I just provided an example of a similar file to prove it's not. JOEBRO64 11:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
You're not going to get anywhere being uncivil. Commons have different rules to the English server, making your example irrelevant. You've been told what to do, and it's not here. -- /Alex/21 11:53, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Anthony Jephson

G14 no longer applies since the creation of articles Anthony Jephson (died 1755) and Anthony Jephson (died 1794). —Opera hat (talk) 09:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Operational Chow ring

G13; the topic not covered in mainspace —Taku (talk) 20:47, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Terry Roberts

I, TLRauthor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TLRauthor (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Doodoobutter/UBX/User Animaniacs

Deleted per user request as something in their own userpage, but is there a process for retrieving old userboxes to host in your own userspace if you would like to continue using them? Or would I just have to create a new Animaniacs userbox from scratch? I feel like I have seen other users do this before, but I am relatively new to userbox creation. Beggarsbanquet (talk) 12:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Gyle Waddy/sandbox

I, Gyle Waddy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gyle Waddy (talk) 17:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

draft:Microfunction

G13; notable enough to be treated in a standalone article —Taku (talk) 22:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Rene Cinquin

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sharp sand

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:African Review (magazine)

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Carver Central High School

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:52, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Eli Glover

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Georgia Florida and Alabama

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alfred Gosden

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Faizullah_Arain

I believe someone mistakenly or for self harm deleted this well reputed page of Faizullah Arain notable person , as someone did before,I saw that it got restored but someone did again. So take a deep look at it. and undeleted it. As its not marketing or self-promotion page its a page for someone who is notable in every sense. —202.47.48.53 (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Athaenara (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. "[M]istakenly or for self harm"? Considering that the last deletion got a few accounts blocked for being spammers... —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 19:54, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Maxim Albertovich Amelin

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Twentystokes (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Samuel J. Reader

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Incuspaze

User reqired content —Akshay Kr Singh 19:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Are you asking that a copy of the final revision's text be sent to you via Wikipedia's email system? Because this AfD precludes any restoration here. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 19:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G4. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, 331dot (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Gluing schemes

G13; the topic, it seems to me, is notable enough for a standalone article. —Taku (talk) 22:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Skeletal Lightning

I, Shermann24, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shermann24 (talk) 23:29, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cassandra Kubinski

I, Bgologan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bgologan (talk) 00:59, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Portal:National Basketball League (Australia)

Portal was deleted due to a previous version of the portal being deleted recently. This version of the portal addressed the concerns of the original deletion (such as it being a portal with minimal elements (a two-line intro, one navbox, and category listing) and it not being updated since 2006). The portal was also deleted without community discussion. —dylan.cns (talk) 03:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G4. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, BrownHairedGirl (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:55, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stephen Bennett (Australian musician)

I, Ozlib, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ozlib (talk) 04:52, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Fadi Haddad

The article was deleted because discussion from more than 2 years, maybe at this time he didnt have notability, or the article is just bad. but now this director he is most famous music video director in arab world, in this 2 years he also directed movie, tv series, tv show, I put many english sources in article, and the arabic sources is more than hundred, I will put this sources again here if you want, and if you still have issues with notability, then actualy there are article for music directors had less notability than him, I recreate because I wonder that he still didnt have article here --FPP (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC) —FPP (talk) 11:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a re-creation of a page previously deleted via deletion debate (specifically, WP:Articles for deletion/Fadi Haddad) that doesn't address the reasons it was deleted last time. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. The existence or absence of other articles on similar topics cannot be used to argue for your article, and "Notability" on Wikipedia has a fairly specific definition. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 18:41, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Differential graded module

G13; likely a valid topic in main space. Also, MfD survivor and G13 is not applicable anyway. —Taku (talk) 21:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Utah Utes men's basketball team

Expired PROD but clearly notable and sources are readily available to anyone with a Google. —Smartyllama (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Hut 8.5. Question, what's the protocol here? Since you've moved it back, it's no longer in the review queue. There's already a draft which is indentical to this article, made created by the same editor. Since it won't get reviewed again, it might sit wholly uncited on WP forever, since the creator obviously has no interest in providing citations. They have done this on quite a few articles. Onel5969 TT me 21:50, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
I haven't moved it anywhere, somebody created a mainspace version and it was deleted through WP:PROD. PRODs can be contested by anybody for any reason, I've just restored that mainspace version after the PROD was contested here. You're welcome to take it to AfD if you still think it should be deleted, although ideally Smartyllama will add some references and make the whole thing moot. Hut 8.5 21:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
I have added a few sources and will add more later if I have time. Smartyllama (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stubbornness (mathematics)

G13; I am not the creator of the draft but the topic seems legitimate (no particular need for deletion). —Taku (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Michael Amini

I, Jberokoff, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jberokoff (talk) 22:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


Draft:Ellington Management Group

I, BelBivDov, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BelBivDov (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, I dropped the ball. I would like to continue working on and submit this entry to the main space. As I recall it was close, and the next step required tracking down admin approval. Many thanks. BelBivDov (talk) 22:54, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Reverse Logistics Association

I, Rontl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rontl (talk) 01:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Red Riding Hood (2006 film)

Request restoration of prod deletion to add sources. —duffbeerforme (talk) 12:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cooperstown Beverage Trail

I, 420Traveler, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 420Traveler (talk) 12:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Haviah Mighty

I put this topic on a google news alert, following the AFD, to see if a new news article would make her obviously notable. She recently won the Polaris Music Prize, so I decided to request userification - only to see someone had already created a brand new article about her earlier this year.

I am requesting all the previous revisions be restored to the visible history. There are multiple previous histories, as a previous iteration was deleted as G10, and I request all revisions restored. Talk page too, please Geo Swan (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC) —Geo Swan (talk) 11:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

The rest I can understand, but why the G10 revisions as well? That makes little sense. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 19:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Done @Geo Swan: I've restored the two prior versions in the article history, the AfDed one and the one which was deleted as a recreation of that version. I don't see any G10 version and the two versions in the deleted history don't look remotely like attack pages. Was that version at another title, or was G10 just a typo for G4? Hut 8.5 21:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I meant G4. Glad you are a mindreader! Thanks!

Vimcontu Broadcasting Corporation

It's an existing company. Proofs are from Official Gazette PH & PH House of Representatives, and it is one of the 10 PH broadcasting franchises signed into law this year. —"Punch me, I'd bleed." -Peter Parker 08:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:45, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tom Gibson (character)

This is the protagonist page for a confirmed web series that's page was recently deleted as well If you have any tips on how to improve this draft, as we were in the process of updating, this would be greatly appreciated. —Shaddai Wright (talk) 04:32, 19 September 2019 (UTC) -Family T.V. Animation Crew (submitting as User:Shaddai Wright)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for pages that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to pages deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the draft you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tom Gibson (character), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the draft was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Elliott Francis

I, Trevsdad1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Trevsdad1 (talk) 19:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Janet Kuypers

I, Walkingseed, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Walkingseed (talk) 21:43, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Khetwadichaganraj

please dont delete this account if i did any mistake m ready to solve it but please dont delete it i request you —Khetwadichaganraj (talk) 16:32, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Deleting aa userpage does not affect the account attached to it. In fact, accounts cannot be deleted for legal and technical reasons. That said, we are not free webspace and have zero tolerance for promotional or hagiographical writings. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 16:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
Are you trying to write an article about Khetwadicha Ganraj? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

European Cricket League

This page was deleted by the wrong reasons. Admin thought it was published by a puppet and not only deleted the article, but blocked me also. But a.) I am not a puppet, but a real journalist from Germany, falling in love with cricket (which is quite a stoary in our country), plus b.) the article includes mayn high class references, which did not seem to be checked by admin either. So I was wondering, whether this may have been a "too speedy" deletion. Could anybody check the article again and - if it fullfills the needs of Wikipedia - restore my piece of work, please? Thanks a lot for your support! —87.144.24.76 (talk) 07:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Addon: I just realized, that there has been a old (July 2019) page under the same name, which has been also deleted, but which is not the one I was writing recently. (10 September 2019) I cannot login anymore, but you may find it under my user name Special:Contributions/löwenstein74 —87.144.24.76 (talk) 07:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

That would have been Draft:European Cricket League. You should talk to User talk:Yunshui about deletions and blocks. We cannot do a socking review here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 Already done by Yunshui Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Clark CA1

I, Ben c g, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ben c g (talk) 17:12, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Security Tokens

I, Coinstreet Sam Lee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Coinstreet Sam Lee (talk) 17:15, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sergei Sherstiuk

I, 4.34.68.225, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 4.34.68.225 (talk) 19:02, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stella Duval

You know why I'm here. —Trillfendi (talk) 21:46, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Avraal Sahir

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —AdhoDiary (talk) 21:07, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Pure (UK TV series)

I, Bwmodular, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bwmodular 08:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Enemies burnt the dear house down

I, Nemtsev, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nemtsev (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2019 (UTC)


As i remember a letter a received soon after publication of the article, the main reason to suspend its publication as an absence of references and links. The problem , to my mind was that these links are entirely in Russian (fir the article is abut a Russian song). However if Russian links are good enough I shall put the into the body of the text. It must be done, and i believe that after these amendments the article will pass all the requirements to be published. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nemtsev (talk • contribs) 09:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Face au Mur (Canadian game show)

This article about the Canadian version of NBC's The Wall was speedily deleted by an administrator. because it was edited by a blocked user in violation of block or ban under CSD G5 The article itself is already quite good and on an interesting topic and had sources. —TheNEWGUYSHornets (talk) 06:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. (TheNEWGUYSHornets also blocked) — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:45, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Gianni Cuozzo

I, 2405:204:568D:8A83:671B:D784:9880:C5AA, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2405:204:568D:8A83:671B:D784:9880:C5AA (talk) 01:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Given that this was written by User:Leoclg, who has been indefinitely blocked for undisclosed paid editing (amongst other things), I'm not really inclined to restore it at the request of an IP. I won't object if someone else does though. Hut 8.5 10:32, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Eric P. Feichthaler

I, Wombles7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wombles7 (talk) 01:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Seifudein Adem

Please undelete this page. The reasoning says Expired Prod and Fails WP:PROF —202.11.207.50 (talk) 09:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of politicians who joined Indian National Congress before Lok Sabha Election 2019

I, 06jay007, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 06jay007 (talk) 10:59, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Marilyn Schlitz

Was deleted five years ago. Have noted that she was a repeat guest on the documentary series, Closer to Truth, of which almost all guests are solidly notable (e.g. Richard Swinburne, William Lane Craig, Neil deGrasse Tyson). Would like it restored and moved to a draft to see if it can be fixed. —Hyperbolick (talk) 19:08, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

John Mark Dougan

Important article about a public figure, may have been deleted inappropriately —2601:646:C202:2F90:89E3:B5FB:F74:2B83 (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Mark Dougan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:45, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Pell Trenton

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Thomas Scott Dean

I, Midmodluvr, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Midmodluvr (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) The user is assumedly after Draft:Thomas Scott Dean ~~ OxonAlex - talk 18:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:North Central Bronx Hospital

I, HugoHelp, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HugoHelp (talk) 18:33, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Nix (Nick Harper album)

I, 92.236.82.81, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.236.82.81 (talk) 19:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Courtland Milloy

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:34, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Maja Elliott

I, Softblackstars, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Softblackstars (talk) 21:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Creating Draft:Make it Active, LLC

Draft:Make it Active, LLC · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Creating Draft:Make it Active, LLC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dadventurefamily (talk • contribs) 21:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Phdalex/sandbox

Hi my page was deleted two times. Second time I tried to adapt it...however it was unfairly deleted again...although I provided other sources...just check this page https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Certificate_in_Quantitative_Finance and explain to me why this page is not promotional and mine was ??? —Phdalex (talk) 22:16, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

  •  Not done That sandbox was certainly promotional. Example text used to fluff up the topic: "spans the entire spectrum " " most advanced" "the top quants in the industry" "all-encompassing" "the whole spectrum of modern" "leveraged the goodwill and resources" "empower individuals" "approach challenges". However it was deleted as a misuse as a web host, about which you should talk to the deleter Fastily. If you intended this to be an article draft then U5 might not apply, but G11 - advertising still would. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
  • On the topic of Certificate in Quantitative Finance see WP:other stuff. Earlier versions of the page were not promotional so it can be repaired by editing. I have added the advert tag. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:25, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Gerard Reinmuth

As a Creative professionals, I would like to contest the nomination for speedy deletion, however the page is no longer in existence that I can see.

It was referenced as G11 Unambiguous advertising or promotion. The information was factual and based off a number of external wiki resources as well as internal wiki references. If it was believe the content was not written from a neutral point of view i would have like the opportunity to adjust the text accordingly

According to the List of Policies Criteria for speedy deletion [1] Articles, images, categories etc. may be "speedily deleted" if they clearly fall within certain categories, which generally boil down to pages lacking content, or disruptive pages. Anything potentially controversial should go through the deletion process instead. The content was not lacking or distruptive and would not cause any controversy. The only criteria that the page could have fallen under would be a Proposed deletion of biographies of living people [2]

If you could advise on how i can proceed, that would be appreciated. or even recover the article as i alot of time was spent learning the system, only to have it disappear overnight. —Gerard Reinmuth (talk) 02:32, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Hello T the person who deleted my page told me that i had to go through this process to get the page reinstated so edits can be made accordingly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gerard Reinmuth (talk • contribs) 05:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
No, you haven't. DGG deleted the draft, not Creffett. Creffett shouldn't have referred you here either. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:05, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
JJMC89, huh, I did not know that G11 pages aren't eligible for REFUND. My bad, I'll remember that for next time. creffpublic a creffett franchise (talk to the boss) 13:50, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks JJMC89 for the help clearing this up, i have spoken to DGG and his response was as follows: "Ten years ago, I would probably have rewritten the page, but there is now so many autobiographies and other promotional material submitted to Wikipedia that it has become impractical. Even two years ago, I would have restored it so you can work on it further. I will no longer restore autobiographies. If any editor without a conflict of interest wants to work on it, I will restore it to draft. If any other administrator wants to restore it so you can work on it, I have no objections. DGG ( talk ) 00:11, 23 September 2019 (UTC)" I have requested it to be restored so i can get an external editor to review the text. Hopefully this will happen soon. Thanks again for your helpGerard Reinmuth (talk) 03:38, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Dame (Rapper)

I, Mannermauler, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mannermauler (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

You probably want Draft:Dame (Rapper) to be undeleated. (Non-administrator comment) ~~ OxonAlex - talk 15:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Chantry Park

I, Crouch, Swale, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Starqt Awards

This is an Africa annual ceremony awards and it has involved many African Stars and still recognize talents across Africa. But secondly it has more references and reliable sources .. it wasn't written as a promotional and it represent an African Award ceremony this is why it was created. Having said that if there is any issue related to promotional words used instead of deleteing it it should be improved and if that is the case kindly put it as a draft for further improvement and if not kindly assist to restore it as it has more details and reference that support its urgumenet —Ndizibanana (talk) 08:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) ​Per Wikipedia:Undeleting speedily-deleted pages, pages deleted under criteria G11, unambiguous promotion, and A7, No indication of importance, are unlikely to undeleteaded. An admin might email you the article, but if it is deemed that you are likely to attempt to restore the article this will not be done.  ~~ OxonAlex - talk 09:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criteria for speedy deletion A7 and G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Aricca Vitanza

original author wishes to restore page —104.175.165.128 (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Why did you inappropriately request deletion? — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Sasha Carrion

I read the comment about me not being notable enough but I respectfully disagree. I've been a guest on numerous talk shows in the past and I continue to be an expert in the field of hypnotherapy and life coaching. I can show plenty of evidence of this. I'm also somebody who has helped a whole lot of people and right now, I'm in the process of pitching my own tv show. I ask that you please reinstate my page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.216.249 (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sasha Carrion, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:34, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Morgan Thorpe

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Gamma Theta Phi

this was the history of this catholic college group.—4.31.147.98 (talk) 19:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Rob Markey

I, Elvira100, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Elvira100 (talk) 20:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lincoln and Parker Film Company

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:32, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Example

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.)

Draft:Basement Systems, Inc.

Will create unbiased content, less puffery —Brittanylees (talk) 20:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RoySmith (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 20:33, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Betsy Obaseki

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Jennifer0001 (talk) 11:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC) Draft:Betsy_Obaseki The post had not been edited for long, but I'll work on it now

(Non-administrator comment) Done It seems Graeme Bartlett has undeleated the article. Marking as done for the bots. ~~ OxonAlex - talk 14:32, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
I forgot to save my tick. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Ooops a Desi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below The movie was released in NYC and WHOLE INDIA on 23rd AUGUST 2013. I can provide the censor certificate and the theaters that it was released in INDIA. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/jenner-jose-debuts-with-a-film-on-americas-illegal-indian-immigrants/articleshow/22003720.cms https://www.imdb.com/title/tt3160450/ https://www.mouthshut.com/hindi-movies/Ooops-a-Desi-reviews-925669208 https://boxofficeindia.com/movie.php?movieid=1428 https://in.bookmyshow.com/karanja-lad/movies/ooops-a-desi/ET00015638 —Jennamanni (talk) 01:10, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

My Girl (The Temptations song)

The history of the page that got deleted somehow between moves. —© Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 19:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

There's no deleted history at that title to restore. Hut 8.5 20:09, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
And at My Girl (Temptations song) the only deleted item is a redirect to the above title. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:13, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

June 10th Suicides at Guantánamo

I am requesting userification. During the AFD it was claimed this academic paper was uncited. One delete respondent explicitly said they would support restoration once it was cited...

Fool's Errand: Time to End the War in Afghanistan, States of Violence: War, Capital Punishment, and Letting Die, Murder at Camp Delta: A Staff Sergeant’s Pursuit of the Truth About Guantanamo Bay, The Guantánamo effect: exposing the consequences of U.S. detention and interrogation practices —Geo Swan (talk) 00:54, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Pradeep Chandran

Pradeep Chandran is a Malayalam Television and Film actor. He born and brought up in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. He was the main protagonist of the second longest Malayalam Television serial “Karuthamuthu” in Asianet Television channel. He acted many main stream Malayalam films in significant roles such as “Drishyam”, “Oppam”, “Ividam Swargamanu” and around 20 films, mostly shared screen space with Mohanlal. He has bagged Asianet new face Television awards in 2011. He has appeared many television shows as guest and contestants such as “Badayibanglaw”, “Comedy Stars”, “Urvash theaters”, “Start Music”, “Onapooram”, “Onamaamangam” etc.—2401:4900:261D:D5E2:B537:21B3:6CF0:DA35 (talk) 07:14, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, Kudpung (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Olexandr Chemykos

I, Shemet aka, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shemet aka (talk) 06:06, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


I created that page about a recognised Ukrainian, but had no time to finalize the work and submit it. I plan to finalize the review of that page in a month. Or it would be pity to waste the work in a half way to finish. Thank you for understanding, - Sergiy —Shemet aka (talk) 06:31, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Snowglider

I, Jokedebock, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jokedebock (talk) 09:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

File:AMAs2012logo.jpg

I re-categorized the logo as free to use, so previous revisions should be un-deleted before transfer to Commons. —George Ho (talk) 22:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Dynamix II

Notibility criteria WP:BAND and WP:NMG(other) of the group/ artist(s)/ song(s)/ relevance to genre / etc. is established with reliable non-local sources.

"Breaks in South Florida, though, had a Miami electro-bass sound, often lovingly referred to as "that ghetto bass." Local DJs like R Fresh, Merlyn and Scratch D of Dynamix II..." "Another South Florida act to make it worldwide was Dynamix II. They started out in West Palm Beach in the 80s using vocoders, samplers, and an emulator. In 1986, they signed to Miami Bass Station Records and released "Give the DJ a Break", a track that went gold, selling 600,000 copies in America and hit #50 in the UK charts a year later. Their music has been sampled by acts like The Chemical Brothers and you can hear their music in DJ sets today." "Dynamix II were cranking out hits that crossed over to other countries and breaks songs were becoming regular on the radio in Florida. ...Though this sound came from the weird armpit of the United States, it actually has relevance behind it, and is still influencing artists to this day."

more:

SmartAsset

Please undelete the SmartAsset page. It looks like the SmartAsset wikipedia article was deleted for the following reason: 06:14, 14 June 2018 Explicit talk contribs deleted page SmartAsset (Expired PROD, concern was: A directory-like listing for an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. References are available: https://techcrunch.com/2018/06/19/smartasset-series-c/, https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/smartasset/timeline/timeline, https://www.alleywatch.com/2018/07/this-nyc-startup-just-raised-28m-to-empower-you-to-manage-your-personal-finances-like-never-before/, https://www.wealthmanagement.com/prospecting/top-qualified-lead-sources-advisors, https://www.theladders.com/career-advice/smartasset-financial-technology-company - I am affiliated with SmartAsset and willing to edit the piece if needed. —172.93.13.238 (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.

Unspecified

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2405:205:C905:DE80:616B:E80:31A0:784A (talk) 15:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

  • Sorry, you'll have to give us some idea which page you want restored. You don't have any deleted contributions and there is no deleted page called "maroon". Hut 8.5 21:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hogan Residence

I, ChrisCaparro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChrisCaparro (talk) 16:36, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:2020 in Wales

I, Llewee, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Llewee (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jean VIlle

G13; it was determined early that the subject is notable (so no reason to delete it except procedurally) —Taku (talk) 22:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Squala Orphan Draft1

I, JPR1977, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JPR1977 (talk) 04:00, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Luqman Hakim Shamsudin

Please don't delete this page for some time, will update it later if he's start his professional career. —R peace11 (talk) 05:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Malt the Brewery

I, BobScott63, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BobScott63 (talk) 06:12, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Dumaguete North Road

I, HueMan1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —hueman1 (talk) 21:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Balibago–Balayan Road

I, HueMan1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. hueman1 (talk) 21:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Macro Hall Jr

I, Namnwod, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Namnwod (talk) 18:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Example

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 97.86.175.114 (talk) 14:37, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Well 97.86.175.114, you will have to tell us what you want as there are no deleted contributions for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:35, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

paievy

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —157.34.122.181 (talk) 17:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? Absent a username, I can't look in userspace drafts (attempting to do so would be like trying to find a specific ear stud in a 10-acre treasure trove). —A little blue Bori v^_^v Fram was railroaded! 21:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
I cannot find anything in the fuzzy search as an article or draft either. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

User:Geojournal

Would like to retrieve previously deleted user page for myself. —Geo talk 00:41, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

 Done --Orange Mike | Talk 02:02, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Leigh_Harris

I, Cyborgnyc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cyborgnyc (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Unique World Records

It is the second largest organisation after Guinness World Records Limited in the field of Record Registration, currently in India, Government departments and Big Brands like Reliance, Cognizant etc only apply records at Unique World Records, it was deleted due to false information posted on page by some wrong people. —Rinkumaurya (talk) 10:17, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unique World Records, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:24, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kingsley Henderson

I, Ivar the Boneful, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 02:22, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Thomas S. Hermanson

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ben Turbett

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:02, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Federal Film Corporation

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:03, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Maximillian Otto Urbahn

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:04, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:African Review

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:05, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Wayne Steven Jackson

I, 2.98.62.134, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.98.62.134 (talk) 08:45, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Wayne Steven Jackson

There are more edits and information to include on the page —2.98.62.134 (talk) 08:47, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

SelfishWays

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Larry Steveson (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2019 (UTC) I AM CURRENTLY WORKING TO CREATE WIKI FOR CLIENT, PLEASE STOP DELETING. THANK YOU

Draft:Sterling Pictures

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:46, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Basic theorems of algebraic K-theory

G13; technically G13 doesn’t apply and also there are enough materials for the article to cover. —Taku (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Gregory Dominic Odjig

Edits coming soon - life got busy :) —Gina Geick - GAWD Productions (talk) 13:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:UK Defence Journal

I, MrGRA, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GRA (talk) 17:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

The Bad

I, 46.140.13.62, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.140.13.62 (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Subaru_Suiren

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —14.202.10.145 (talk) 19:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm Not sure why it was deleted - as it is an actual prototype by Subaru - Is not discussed anywhere else & as noted in commentary elsewhere is significant to have its own entry, however it does need work to update though ... ;)

Cheers, Bantum ...

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This was deleted because it hadn't been edited for six months. Hut 8.5 21:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Be Still for the Presence of the Lord

This hymn was voted as one of the UK's 10 most popular hymns in 2019. See https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-49871456 —Greenshed (talk) 20:52, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of ISFA All-Americans

I, Quidster4040, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Quidster4040 (talk) 21:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Roswell Field Putnam‬

I, Roswell'sfriend, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Roswell'sfriend (talk) 00:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

GRT Jewellers

The page was deleted for "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". If the page can be reinstated, it will help us review the page again and remove any content which sounds promotional —Copywritrix (talk) 07:43, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done It was full of advertising, but an earlier version was OK. Do not add any promotional language to this page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Suman Kumar Mallick

Wikipedia authority was right while they deleted this article because the creator of this article did violate many Wikipedia Guidelines especially "sock puppet". The subject of the page "Suman Kumar Mallick" is definitely a well known political figure and Wikipedia should provide its readers a chance to study this article. I think that Wikipedia Authority should restore this article and add a template to stop its vandalism. I suggest that you still not unblock the creator. I can help Wikipedia going through and improving the article. Please restore! —2409:4064:518:8AAE:D024:EBA:963C:2726 (talk) 09:48, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suman Kumar Mallick, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:30, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Basavaraj simani

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Basavaraj simani (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Filtrator

See Talk:Filtrator —VictorPorton (talk) 23:09, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Also the same arguments as for undeletion request for "Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1". --VictorPorton (talk) 23:58, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

I am also reprising the content of the talk page I created after deletion here, because this talk page itself was marked for speedy deletion :-)

RHaworth removed the page based on his opinion that I used an IP without a user name to remove a SDR at my page. This is false. I do not know who removed this request. All I know that one who removed it was with IP 95.185.78.0. This page show that the IP is from Saudi Arabia, while as you can check I am from Israel! It would be impossible for me to obtain a Saudi Arabia IP. So the claim that the person who deleted it was me is more than unfounded.

As such, the only reason for deleting the page was a false information. (There were provided reasons for speedy deletion but I disputed all of them at both the talk page and at this page. Please restore both the page itself to consider its speedy deletion again and the talk page with my disputes.)

The log shows it was deleted as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" not because of an IP removing a SDN. Articles don't get deleted simply because a notice was removed. It was also deleted earlier due to a discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filtrator which found WP:COI there too. Dharmalion76 (talk) 00:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

It looks like that the article was deleted multiple times. Concerning Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Filtrator I have counterarguments: It (restated) claims that filtrators are not studied by people and thus are not worth of an encyclopedia article. It is false: The article where filtrators are defined is cited 4 times in Google Scholar (is MathSciNet the only source of authoritative citations?) These sources are cited by other sources (I didn't count how many!) So filtrators are studied by people. --VictorPorton (talk) 00:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
G11 applies only to articles that are exclusively promotional. My claim on the talk page that the page has academic content, relies to authoritative and notable source was not disproved. So there is not reason that it is exclusively promotional. G11 states "If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." I request you to follow this G11 rule! I also claimed at the talk pages that Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion does not apply in this particular case: The items Self-promotion. does not disallow to write about projects in which you have a strong personal involvement! It just requires to follow the other policies when writing about myself. It was not proved that I did not follow these policies. Therefore I request restoration of the pre-deleted talk page to consider all my arguments. Anything other would be against sound sense. --VictorPorton (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@Dharmalion76: Moreover, you demonstrated absolutely no evidence that the article is not written from NPOV. Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion.
A small note: I presented about 5 or 6 arguments or so that G11 is not violated. You must restore my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorPorton (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:05, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1

Talk:Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1 —VictorPorton (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Additionally, my article was deleted again by Elahrairah with the message "Very short article lacking sufficient context to identify subject of article". It is 100% unjust for example because my article was longer than many established many years articles on similar topics. 100% wrong a reason for deletion.

That talk page has been deleted. (And re your last statement in it, I sympathize with having your work ganged up on like that.) Could you explain why it should be undeleted on here like you did on the page? – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
John M Wolfson The talk page recreated. I give serious arguments at User_talk:VictorPorton#October_2019 and at the both deleted and newer versions of the talk page that my page should have not been deleted. Wikipedia should restore the page to continue considering SDR because my arguments not to do speedy deletion were not answered! I don't remember by heart all my arguments, but many of my arguments remained at User_talk:VictorPorton#October_2019. Please restore it for the wikipedians to see and respond to all my arguments against speedy deletion. --VictorPorton (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Looking through your talk page, I'm afraid I don't see any reason for undeletion. Promoting your own work falls under WP:NOTADVERTISING, and G11 deletions, which is what the original deletion was, are ineligible for undeletion under this process. I am not an administrator, so I'm unable to make the final judgment on that and will get out of everyone's way, but whatever happens I wish you the best of luck with your book and your endeavors! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
My article was deleted because of supposed (as I proved fake) deletion of the SDN by myself not because of WP:NOTADVERTISING. The deleted talk page contains my counter-arguments stating that WP:NOTADVERTISING does not apply in this particular case. These arguments were not answered! So the sound sense requires to undelete my page to continue to consider its speedy deletion accordingly to WP:NOTADVERTISING, as the consideration was just not finished! If other users disprove my arguments, then it could be deleted again. --VictorPorton (talk) 23:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
With all due respect, please state your arguments concisely, politely, and here (as in this page, as opposed to the article's talk page or yours); it'll make it far more likely that your arguments are accepted or at least not dismissed as nutty. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:53, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I cannot remember by heart all the arguments I has provided. Wikipedia administrators, please restore the talk pages as they were prior to deletion(s) for Algebraic General Topology. Volume 1 and also for Filtrator and put their content here. --VictorPorton (talk) 00:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

I am also reprising the content of the talk page I created after deletion here, because this talk page itself was marked for speedy deletion :-)

RHaworth removed the page based on his opinion that I used an IP without a user name to remove a SDR at my page. This is false. I do not know who removed this request. All I know that one who removed it was with IP 95.185.78.0. This page show that the IP is from Saudi Arabia, while as you can check I am from Israel! It would be impossible for me to obtain a Saudi Arabia IP. So the claim that the person who deleted it was me is more than unfounded.

As such, the only reason for deleting the page was a false information. (There were provided reasons for speedy deletion but I disputed all of them at both the talk page and at this page. Please restore both the page itself to consider its speedy deletion again and the talk page with my disputes.)

The log shows it was deleted as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" not because of an IP removing a SDN. Articles don't get deleted simply because a notice was removed. The entire article relied on the work of "Victor Porton" and it was authored by VictorPorton so G11 was rather obvious. Dharmalion76 (talk) 00:28, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

I disagree that G11 is obvious. Really, "the entire article relied on the work of "Victor Porton" and it was authored by VictorPorton", but its talk page before the deletion contained unaswered counter arguments against that it is an unambiguous advertising or promotion. The sound sense requires to answer all my arguments against speedy deletion before deciding to remove the page! --VictorPorton (talk) 00:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
G11 applies only to articles that are exclusively promotional. My claim on the talk page that the page has academic content, relies to authoritative and notable source was not disproved. So there is not reason that it is exclusively promotional. G11 states "If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion." I request you to follow this G11 rule! I also claimed at the talk pages that Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion does not apply in this particular case: The items Self-promotion. does not disallow to write about projects in which you have a strong personal involvement! It just requires to follow the other policies when writing about myself. It was not proved that I did not follow these policies. Therefore I request restoration of the pre-deleted talk page to consider all my arguments. Anything other would be against sound sense. --VictorPorton (talk) 00:52, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@Dharmalion76: It may be obvious to you but is not obvious to me (yes, it does look like obvious). Please specify obviuous by which exactly policy rule? (Provide a quote!) --VictorPorton (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@Dharmalion76: Moreover, you demonstrated absolutely no evidence that the article is not written from NPOV. Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion.
A small note: I presented about 5 or 6 arguments or so that G11 is not violated. You must restore my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictorPorton (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:07, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Jamin_Thompson

I, Destinypearson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Destinypearson (talk) 01:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Sergii Mashevskyi

This is the first time I am trying to fill out my Wikipedia page, and for me it was strange why my page was deleted. I wrote everything absolutely correctly and truthfully. My clients ask me to fill out my Wikipedia page, but now I don’t know how to do it. If it’s not difficult for you, I ask you to unblock my page and explain what I need to fix, so that it would not be deleted again. Thank you. My info https://www.imdb.com/name/nm8063585/ —Sergii Mashevskyi (talk) 05:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
@Sergii Mashevskyi: It's reasonable for a user page to have a little bit of information about you, but you may not turn it into a giant billboard for your company. That's what you had done before the page was deleted. Wikipedia does not exist as a web host for you to mention (or worse, advertise) your business. —C.Fred (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2019 (UTC)


Talk:Peanuts/Archive 3

The archive #3 page for the Peanuts article was inadvertently created in mainspace as Peanuts/Archive 3. I moved the mainspace article to Talk:Peanuts/Archive 3 and tagged the Talk page for the mainspace article as delete, which is probably incorrect in this instance because (duh) I moved it to Talk:. —Schazjmd (talk) 18:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Done —C.Fred (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Please undelete Draft:Kashmira Panache

This was my first article on Wikipedia It was not promotion or advertisement. If any parts of it needs to be changed I am ready to work on it and change it.

It was deleted even before I could put forward my point of view/ arguments and do the required edits if required!
Please do restore it.
Thank you

Sayujsmenon (talk) 17:18, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

@Sayujsmenon: You need to discuss this with RHaworth, the admin who deleted the page. If you are unable to work things out with them, then you'll need to appeal via WP:Deletion review. As is stated above, this is not the place to request undeletion of articles deleted under speedy criterion G11, spam. —C.Fred (talk) 18:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Insane Pools: Off the Deep End

I, Lucaslagoons, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lucaslagoons (talk) 23:29, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Lucaslagoons: Make sure to address the referencing issues as you work on the article. —C.Fred (talk) 23:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Jack West (musician)

I forgot about this page and I was meaning to get around to it to make more edits and add more sources. It would be disappointing if I had to start over. I will finalize this draft within a month or so if it is undeleted. —2601:18B:8380:1A40:3DB0:7ECF:5DC9:6DC4 (talk) 00:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

List of Iraqi poets

Deleted because of "G3: Blatant hoax". What a reason! I don't know what that means at all to make discussion about it as creator of that page. —Ruwaym (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

  • You'll need to talk to the deleting admin (User:El C) or go to WP:DRV. I'm not immediately seeing why this is a hoax, it does appear to be a list of Iraqi poets as the name suggests. Hut 8.5 20:36, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
  • I've reviewed El C's talk page, and there's a discussion on it already which clarifies what the problem was: it's that the list includes a lot of people who significantly predate the existence of Iraq, and are more properly described as other nationalities and not as "Iraqi". The term "Iraqi" does not retroactively encompass people who lived in contemporary Iraqi territory before it was Iraq — a list of Iraqi people cannot include anybody who lived before Iraq had the name Iraq. If it was Mesopotamia in the person's time then they're a Mesopotamian poet, not an Iraqi poet; if it was the Ottoman Empire then they're an Ottoman poet, not Iraqi poet; and on and so forth: if they lived and died before Iraq was Iraq, then they're not Iraqi. Bearcat (talk) 02:01, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Radio Woking

The station seems to have been deleted for being non-notable. Would like to work on updating the article to fulfill issues mentioned. —Tod55 (talk) 12:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 19:12, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Devin Scheu

I, 24.214.198.66, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.214.198.66 (talk) 12:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)


i Would like to view this article" button below —24.214.198.66 (talk) 12:20, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Dombivli Tamil Makkal Sangam‬

Draft:Dombivli Tamil Makkal Sangam · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] {{subst:refund Dombivli Tamil Makkal Sangam‬ I would like to publish the article}}

User:Boostyourgrades/sandbox

now have outside sources as references —— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:43:100:8A9:30F7:6490:DF5E:4262 (talk) 12:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Boostyourgrades/sandbox

Now have outside references —Boostyourgrades (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Squadron Leader Lawrence 'Benny' Goodman

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Robertbgoodman (talk) 15:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Adalberto Carrasquilla

I, Ivan Milenin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

  • The reason I request this page to be undeleted is because I had created this article, but the page was nominated for deletion just because he "failed" to meet the notability guidelines on Wikipedia. He received a preliminary World Cup squad, but was not nammed in the final 23. I argued that the article should be draftified, and the result was draftify, and I am happy with it. A few months later, the Draft:Adalberto Carraquillla was delated because it's an abandoned draft. As I noticed that he scored a goal on behalf on his debut in the CONCACAF Nations League, I believe it should be necessary to restored it on this statistical case. Any outcome of this request would be much appreciated. Whatever the outcome might be, I will understand. Thanks and have a nice day. Ivan Milenin (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Carole Polchies

I, Ambundon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ambundon (talk) 23:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Roger Galo

I, Biographies2019k, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Biographies2019k (talk) 03:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


User:apap04

Restore the first ever version of my userpage which was deleted by Pathoschild. —–Aνδρέας talk | contributions 03:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Joe Hart (journalist)

I, 2600:1700:8B60:CA00:4194:CF69:F030:9B1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2600:1700:8B60:CA00:4194:CF69:F030:9B1 (talk) 11:23, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Iran–Oman Pipeline

Draft:Iran–Oman Pipeline · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] {{subst:refund|1= Draft:Iran–Oman Pipeline |2= Why wasn't it just published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.136.82 (talk) 18:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It was not published because the writer did not submit it for review. I have submitted it for you. This may take a few more months to action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:17, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Shane Fennessey

I, Bmajeski, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bmajeski (talk) 23:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


I have more established reliable, in-depth, independent sources to add to this draft so that it may be approved —Bmajeski (talk) 23:46, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Gaston Quiribet

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sterling Pictures (silent film company)

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 05:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Paras Tomar (2)

request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under G5 by other user. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it —115.134.34.222 (talk) 05:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Please consult with user talk:Bbb23 on this issue. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Paras Tomar

The article can be undeleted for many reasons . Although, page was deleted due to less notability but it was noted that this person is a person who is a well known in India . And to be included in Wikipedia, this person have longer than a decade career compromises of RJ, actor, hosting and most recent a producer . Article can be improved much better if revived keeping in mind with more protection. Article will be improved based on WP:ENT,WP:NACTOR , WP:GNG in mind to improve the page to be more neutral & less promotion in every part of article . Do help —2001:E68:5404:51DA:DCF7:13B8:F69F:901 (talk) 12:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paras Tomar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 13:43, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
I should note that there seems to be a sockpuppeteer dedicated to trying to get this guy on Wikipedia. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Jovialedit/Archive. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 06:28, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

File:YouTubeRedOSLogo.png

(in conjunction with File:YouTubeRedOMLogo.png) These files were deleted as F5. However, if you take a look at File:Logo of YouTube Originals.png in particular, the logos are too simple to be copyrighted. They still need a trademark...mark.

Refunding these would make it easier to transfer them to Commons. | abequinnfourteen 21:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Mahmoud Karem

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —197.52.9.166 (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2019 (UTC) I am unsure why it was deleted, I have multiple sources to add to the page yet I was not given a warning before deletion of this page

Draft:Mark Ruffin

I, Boldtypev, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Boldtypev (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Thita Rangsitpol Manitkul

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —183.88.75.51 (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC) ==Please UNDelete Thita_Manitkuland Move to Thita Manitkul Rangsitpol[7]

a member of national legislature is inherently notable [[User talk:78.26]] [8]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thita_Manitkul

Delete - She is not notable person in Thailand even me who live in Thailand doesn't know who she is. If the page can still keep I think I can crete my profile in Wikipedia too or other people around the world can do it. This page is edit by her family include bias and unreference message. The important is she is not important to has her own Wikipedia page. Ministerboy (talk) 00:57, 2 November 2018 (UTC) Delete - The Norwegian WP twin article have been stripped down to only two sources that might mention her, but they are in Thai so it has not been possible to check. All the other sources that was provided did not mention her name. This needs at least one reliable source proving that she actually have been an elected member of parliament. Whithout that the article does not seem notable. regards ツDyveldi ☯ prat ✉ post 21:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.183.88.75.51 (talk) 04:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

 Not done You are confusing us by quoting a chunk of the AFD. Anyway the page can be recreated if membership of national legislature can be proved. If however you have been banned or are part of the paid editors creating this before, then let someone else write an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:NATAN International Humanitarian Aid

I, Hlee4iha, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hlee4iha (talk) 07:52, 6 October 2019 (UTC)


I am still working on retrieving information and creditable sources in order to complete this page and submit it for publishing. I would like it to be undeleted so I can continue working on the page. Thank you. —Hlee4iha (talk) 07:54, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of Grand Designs New Zealand episodes

I, Kelly42, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kelly42 (talk) 18:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

 Not done This was full of copying from the official websites so I deleted it again. You can start again without copying. Episode and series descriptions must be in your own words Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

China Okasi

Noticed that this page was erroneously deleted. Subject meets Wikipedia's standard for importance in publishing, specifically a minimum of three national sources that cite the subject. Was looking online for more information about the source and could not find anything. Created a page. Noticed that one had been created before and deleted without proper review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20clarity20 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

@20clarity20: I'm not sure whether you're contesting the original AfD or the speedy deletion tag on the recreated article, but this is not the place to address either of those. The former—and the latter, if the page is actually deleted—would go to WP:DRV after you discuss with the deleting admin. —C.Fred (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

C.Fred Deleting admin says MelanieN. Clicked on "talk" on her page. Has no way to talk to deleting admin. Could you kindly explain how to reach admin?

@20clarity20: Her user talk page (User talk:MelanieN) is not protected. You can leave a message there the same way you did here. —C.Fred (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Herman (lawyer)

I, NewAmerica101, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NewAmerica101 (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I worked on this article a few years back, and would like to work on it again, with updated information that I believe will improve its quality and likelihood for acceptance.

If possible, please undelete this article so that I can begin work on this again.

Thank you!

I, NewAmerica101, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NewAmerica101 (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, not sure I am in the right place. I worked on this article a few years ago. I would like to work on it again, due to recent changes in the subject which I believe will enhance the quality of ht article and increase its chances of acceptance. I am asking that you undelete it so that I can resume work on this article.

Thank you. —NewAmerica101 (talk) 16:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 20:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Untitled Sonic game

I, TheJoebro64, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JOEBRO64 17:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

This is a draft for an upcoming video game. It hasn't been edited recently because detailed news hasn't sprouted up just yet, but this likely will change within the next few months. JOEBRO64 17:58, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Magaret Lin Xavier

I, Paul_012, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paul_012 (talk) 00:30, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:38, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Stage Write Software

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jeffwhiting (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lazebnik's theorem

G13; I’m not the creator of the draft and don’t know if it is notable (though likely so). I cannot tell if the deleted content is worth preserved as I cannot see it. —Taku (talk) 07:39, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Jehan Ara

I, Saqib, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saqib (talk) 08:57, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Kindly do the needful. --Saqib (talk) 09:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Not done this is not a draft or articles for creation submission and it wasn't deleted under G13. It was deleted as a copyright violation, and we don't restore those here. We don't restore them anywhere, in face, unless they aren't actually copyright violations. Hut 8.5 09:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Guys I am talking about draft, not the one in main NS. --Saqib (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Kalsoom Lakhani

I, Saqib, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saqib (talk) 08:58, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Kindly do the needful. --Saqib (talk) 09:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Yes I am talking about the draft. Sorry for being unclear. --Saqib (talk) 10:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Draft:Midnite Hellion

I, Tolivetody, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tolivetody (talk) 13:09, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please also note that the article requires sources that were created independently of the band itself to meet the notability criteria. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:48, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Bradley Lewin

I, ThisIsVETA, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ThisIsVETA (talk) 20:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:53, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Special Collections and Archives (University of Nevada, Las Vegas)

I, Metadataguy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Metadataguy (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Urban Sprinkling

I, Lorenafiorini, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lorenafiorini (talk) 08:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)


the article was rejected because the review considered the submission with "insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.". I could not resubmit it before but now I would like to do so by modifying the previous submission. —Lorenafiorini (talk) 08:26, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Reviewed and approved photo accidentally deleted

RE: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Ron_Roy_(producer) Main TEMPLATE Photo

While editing/updating the TEMPLATE box (top right of page) with proper new info - the original photo displayed there (for quite a number of years) disappeared.

It is listed: Ron Roy File:Ron Roy (Actor).jpg Ron Roy at Golden Globes Awards

This photo was reviewed and approved many years ago by administrators - and has been the main photo displayed on the page since around 2013 or 2014.

The photo is quite important to the overall theme of the page.

I was only attempting to update the info properly in the template - not delete the photo.

I'm asking to have the photo reinstated due to my unknowingly, accidentally and unwittingly causing the deletion.

I sincerely apologize for any time and trouble it may take to rectify this.

I appreciate your help and understanding!

Sincerely and respectfully,

Ron Roy

PS: I have the original jpg if needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whozjngalt (talk • contribs) 07:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

It looks like you accidentally edited the page to not display the file by changing an "a" to "A". Is File:Ron Roy (actor).jpg the correct file? It is there not deleted and Sumanuil has put it back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Arie Trouw

I, Techie3, on behalf of Hannig25, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as he intends to work on it. TheTrainNoch (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Materiales nanoestructurados

El articulo que se hizo es enciclopédico, ya que cuenta con los requisitos de un articulo enciclopédico, 

además de que esta bien hecho y cuenta con referencias confiables de donde obtuvimos la información —AndreHol8a (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
AndreHol8a Did you mean to ask this on the Spanish wikipedia? We don't appear to have had an article or draft by this title. Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
You can ask es:Usuario discusión:Edslov or ask here es:Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de los bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Solicitudes de restauración/Actual. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Regional Democracy

I, Wilandrewson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wilandrewson (talk) 13:25, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Charles Weinblatt

Enter your reasoning here My biography was listed by Wikipedia for about 20 years, until a few months ago, when for some unknown reason, it was deleted. I can think of no reason why my biography should be deleted. I continue to publish in retirement, including in 2015 by Texas Tech University Press, for fiction. I continue to write books and I have been a very prolific book reviewer for The New York Journal of Books, where I have authored over one hundred new book reviews, as requested by publishers and the NY Journal of Books leadership. Please republish my biography, as it was listed for 20 years and including my most recent published books. and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cweinbl 20:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Not done for a start we very strongly discourage people from writing about themselves. Secondly the page was deleted because you don't appear to meet WP:BIO, and nothing you've mentioned affects that. Finally since this was deleted through a deletion discussion it doesn't qualify for restoration here, you would need to talk to the deleting admin or go to WP:DRV. Hut 8.5 20:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

anne carlsen center

Page was deleted for unknown reason. Would like to edit and resubmit —Sambrownell (talk) 23:31, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
@Sambrownell: If you're going to attempt to submit a new article, make sure it maintains neutral point of view and is not a promotional piece. —C.Fred (talk) 00:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Musikprotokoll

I want to make this austrian music festival visible in the english Wikipedia version. I found new sources, from external websites that shows that this festival exists since 1968 and that text should be more neutral. Btw. - which was never an intention of this Wikipedia article.—Rimba72 (talk) 07:15, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 07:33, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Erased Draft 1

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Markstevens2986 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 07:37, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Let Them Eat Cake

I, Sedaray, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sedaray (talk) 23:08, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 07:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Nupur_Kohli

I was busy writing a book so all the attention was there. And the person providing technical help for this page was unavailable for a long time but now willing to provide technical help. So due to inactivity on the draft for more than 6 months the article was deleted. And I strongly believe the article is now of significantly more value to Wikipedia with new very important additions. —Vkohli1 (talk) 07:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. SoWhy 07:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Manolis Emmanouel

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 86.153.153.244 (talk) 11:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Manolis Emmanouel

Wabash_Battalion_Army_ROTC

I, 2605:A000:1128:45E4:2D67:7A4D:5B0A:5F47, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2605:A000:1128:45E4:2D67:7A4D:5B0A:5F47 (talk) 10:32, 9 October 2019 (UTC)



Was waiting for the page to get published after stating it was ready for publishing multiple times and it was never published "Publish changes" button below —2605:A000:1128:45E4:2D67:7A4D:5B0A:5F47 (talk) 10:34, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Gautesetehallen

I, Thebundok, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thebundok (talk) 09:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)


Was not aware that it was still in draft mode (I'm new to publishing/editing) would like to see where I left off and actually publish this time. :p —Thebundok (talk) 09:50, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Laugo Arms Alien pistol

I, Walther Rohrl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Walther Rohrl (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Steven Ball

Draft deleted through inactivity. Able to upload new content if undeleted and continue revision of article. . —Saintier (talk) 13:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:OZWE Games

I, Anoderger, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anoderger (talk) 15:55, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. SoWhy 15:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Wabash_Battalion_Army_ROTC

Have been waiting patiently for review for over 6 months —MilhousTellsStories (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done. While I understand your frustration with a longer than usual wait time, this board is not for requesting a review of a non-deleted page. SoWhy 15:59, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Frederick Edwin Alfred Manning

Working to address reason why declined Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —KManganese (talk) 16:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:06, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Princess Keisha Omilana.

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Kunleomilana (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC) I am humbly requesting that article page "Princess Keisha Omilana" be undeleted. I just want to clarify below that I am Prince Adekunle Adebayo Omilana, a prince of Ipetu Ijesa. Arigbabuowo is one of the royal ruling houses in Ipetu Ijesa. Out of these ruling houses, a prince can be nominated to become the King. Royal ruling houses were created from the early Kings in the town. This is very sacred and that is why l am writing this. This is not just "that the man she married may be related to someone who was the king of that town roughly half a millennia ago". My wife is also a fashion Model with many achievements and they were referenced in the article. Please look into this and undelete the article. Thank you very much. Kind regards, Kunle Omilana — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kunleomilana (talk • contribs) 17:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Keisha Omilana, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, JJMC89 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 20:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Unspecified

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Weelarry (talk) 18:44, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@Weelarry: is this regarding Draft:Rory Skinner? Hut 8.5 20:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:VoIP.ms

I, DanielaBrito01, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DanielaBrito01 (talk) 20:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:NC Attorney General's Dogwood Award

It was deleted because I hadn't edited it in 6 months. This is an annual award and we are now ready to update it with the new award recipients. —Carolinehall219 (talk) 21:04, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Rory Skinner

Page to be updated with new information and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Weelarry (talk) 22:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Done —C.Fred (talk) 23:52, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
@Weelarry: Make sure to update the page and address the concerns raised before resubmitting. —C.Fred (talk) 23:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

‎Q69961534

This page was requested for deletion by mistake —45.123.41.94 (talk) 09:05, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

This was deleted from Wikidata so we cannot help you here. goto https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User_talk:Mahir256 to ask if you disagree with deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Orlando's Summer of Love

The page was apparently deleted/merged with reasoning that was evidently entirely meritless. I've explained the situation at length (right here) where I have asked the deleting administrator for assistance. However there has not been a reply to date. I am not certain that new evidence is actually required here. Nevertheless, there is also new evidence. Clearly, this era in Orlando was notable and the era has been dubbed "Orlando's Summer of Love" as reported . This era evolved into the Orlando Sound as documented in various reliable non-local sources.(see also Second Summer of Love and Madchester)—Johnvr4 (talk) 15:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

  • @Johnvr4: we can't just overturn the deletion discussion here, if you want that then try WP:DRV. We could restore the deleted version as a draft for you to work on or merge somewhere else, however you would need to make changes to address the concerns raised in the AfD before moving it back to mainspace. The main concern in the AfD seems to be that some sources mention the subject as existing but don't discuss it in much more detail than that. I don't think the link you have there will help much with this as it also doesn't do much more than mention that the subject exists. Hut 8.5 21:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Hut 8.5. Alleged NM WP:GNG (A7?) was the supposed issue raised. That the sources don't discuss it in much more detail is just one of bogus assertions in the discussion that I am referring to. Can you at least verify the absurdity/validity of such assertions before sending me on? Please just read the quotes from quality sources on the subject... and the new one.Johnvr4 (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
WP:REFUND is not the place to have this discussion. Please follow the instructions above for the next steps.
@Johnvr4: Are you asking for advice on whether the sources are good before you proceed to the deletion review? A deletion via the AfD process will not be overturned here. —C.Fred (talk) 21:50, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, C.Fred Yes, if possible please offer your opinion on the apparent source quality--it's nothing official. A simple, "You're probably right and should go about this in the following way..." or, "You're wrong, this is why, and forget about it... would be fine.
The indication in AfD discussion was that the reliable sources in the deleted stub were somehow inadequate for basic general notability WP:GNG (there were fifteen expansive sources on this era at the time of deletion not counting the new one and there even are more available). The assertion(s) were so absurd that I've asked the deleting editor advice about how to best handle it because WP:DRVPURPOSE did not seem to apply to a scenario where new evidence is only required because all previously presented evidence was blatantly misrepresented in Afd and just ignored in any subsequent discussion. I know the sources are good but if any admin would like to confirm, provide opinion, or guidance on any particular source or the specific DRVPURPOSE to use for requesting a DRV, it would be appreciated--even if only one source

By 1991-1992, Orlando experienced its own "summer of love" through the culture that sprang up around the weekend acid-house nights at the Beacham Theater... By the time Rolling Stone discovered the scene, late-night culture had become a shadow of its former self".

Also note that in addition to 20+ years of local media coverage, there is an expansive L.A. Weekly source article as well as a multi-page Rolling Stone article on the subject in issue No. 0767 too!
Thank you,Johnvr4 (talk) 04:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
  • @Johnvr4: I looked at the deleted article, and if you went to DRV, I would endorse the deletion while suggesting you create a new draft. I really think the best course of action is to start from scratch. Start fresh at Draft:Orlando's Summer of Love. Build a draft that cites extensive coverage in reliable sources. If you do that, then the draft can be accepted and moved to mainspace. I really think you'll get better results that way than trying to bring back the train wreck of an old article. —C.Fred (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
C.Fred Thank you very much for your assessment of the situation. Of course my intent is to improve the stub or new page draft or whatever. However, I'm just not understanding the previous WP:GNG concerns at AfD or any of the concerns questioning whether these sources support GNG of this era, in this place, as well the naming of the era as "Orlando's summer of love".
This part of your advice above stood out: "...that cites extensive coverage in reliable sources. If you do that..."
Was this not already done with the 15 extensive coverage sources the deleted page? I can see what was deleted here
Any new or improved article will have to include restatement and WP:CITETRIM of the exact same deleted, but highly reputable, reliable and verifiable information on the subject and will cite the exact same sources plus any others I find that were not included previously.
If the deleted information is to be included, wouldn't I first need to present the evidence (here I've presented actual proof) to show these sources are are adequate for WP:GNG and that all previous concerns that led to deletion at AfD were meritless? If so, where? I'm such a rusty editor, please treat me as a beginner. Johnvr4 (talk) 16:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
@Johnvr4: Again, what you need to do is write a draft that demonstrates the notability of the subject through the article text, not just quoting a bunch of sources. The prior deletion was in order. I look forward to seeing a new draft of the article; I will be glad to discuss improvements further at Draft talk:Orlando's Summer of Love after you do so, but there is nothing further to discuss here. —C.Fred (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
Thank you again C.Fred. I do appreciate the help. Is that principle called WP:CONTN? Please try to grasp the confusion that the conflict between above guidance and this policy is causing me.
Is it the quality of a publisher, or the coverage in a source that is at issue? There is national, extensive coverage of the subject in multiple outlets. Is this disputed?
WP:NEXIST, WP:NRV, and the WP:SUSTAINED coverage of several local publishers all apply to the sources covering this subject. Johnvr4 (talk) 16:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
After taking another look at the original concerns raised, per WP:FAILN an editor requested that the author (me) provide additional sources (I suppose I am the default "subject expert" too but there may be others or better subject experts on WP). That editor was offered and then received many additional sources that should have easily satisfied any concern per WP:FAILN. Despite the additional reliable sources added to demonstrate WP:N and WP:GNG for the requesting editor, the merge discussion was opened at Talk:Orlando anyway. The original question of WP:FAILN was the only concern put forth to continue the merge discussion and then AfD discussion continued following that.
Please note that the original and specific WP:FAILN concern was that the term "Orlando Summer of Love" was coined by only one author in 1998.
However, some 19 years after the 1998 source, a new 2017 source from a different author was published which also uses the term.
The 2017 source was published between the two merge/delete discussions but was never discussed (as stated to the deleting editor at User talk:Malcolmxl5#Orlando's_Summer_of_Love).
This new source shows that the concern of the term being used by only one author is unfounded and that there is also WP:SUSTAINED coverage of this subject. Should the deleting editor decline to resolve it, this is the issue WP:DRV would need to consider.Johnvr4 (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Just to be clear, the original deletion discussion was not "meritless". It was not conducted on the grounds of whether the subject was notable or not — it was conducted on the grounds that as written, the article was a piece of junk that did absolutely nothing whatsoever to demonstrate whether the topic was actually notable or not. It literally consisted of a single sentence stating that "Orlando's Summer of Love" was a thing that happened, ended right there without containing so much as one comma of context for what it actually was or why an encyclopedia should care about it, and then reference bombed that sentence to 15 separate footnotes that contained very large passages of text, quoted verbatim in defiance of our copyright violation rules. As the deletion nominator of the first version, I certainly never said that the topic was an inherently non-notable thing — the problem was that the article, as written, was a substanceless piece of junk that was failing to demonstrate the topic's potential notability at all. Unusually, one of the commenters in the deletion discussion even posted a screenshot of the original article to the AFD page to back up how bad it was — and you can plainly see that regardless of whether "Orlando's Summer of Love" is a notable thing or not, that version of an article about it was completely failing to demonstrate its notability at all.
    Please realize that deletion is not a permanent ban on a subject ever being allowed to have an article at all — we have lots of topics in Wikipedia where a bad early version got deleted, but then something (new notability achievements, better sourcing, etc.) happened later on to change the equation. It is entirely possible to write a bad, deletable article about a topic that would be allowed to keep a good one — copyright violations, articles that just state that the subject exists while failing to actually explain why its existence might be noteworthy, and on and so forth. So the fact that the first version was deleted does not mean we have to overturn the original deletion — the first deletion discussion does not mean you're not allowed to try again: it just means you need to do better than the first version.
    If you can write a proper article about Orlando's Summer of Love, which contains a lot more detail to contextualize its significance and properly cites better sources than the first version did, then by all means bring it on — but we don't need to restore the original version before you're allowed to do that, because that's not how Wikipedia's rules work. If you do a good job, then the new article will be accepted entirely on its own merits, and will not get redeleted just because a bad version got deleted before. If you can do a better job than the bad first version, then there's no rule that we would have to reverse the deletion of the bad first version before you're allowed to try. Even DRV does not have to weigh in before you're allowed to try to write a better article — DRV is for questions of whether the original closure was objectively incorrect on a matter of policy, not situations where you just want to take a stab at creating a better article based on new evidence that wasn't already offered the first time. Bearcat (talk) 15:16, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Bearcat Thank you for the reply here. I know you are an experienced editor. No one, including me, ever said the stub article was good. I said it was notable and that it has good sources that demonstrate it. I also noticed some WP:OWH over this page from Feb, 14, 2017 that I saw today harassment.
I've asked about the original concern by another editor--the very first one: "edit: 768073072; date: 2017-03-01; summary: Term coined by a single reporter is not notable enough for its own article. Merged to Orlando, Florida#Local_culture".
As you are the deletion nominator of the first version, you in fact are saying it is a non-notable thing just by nominating it for deletion.WP:FAILN. All of the deletion concerns raised by yourself and most of the other editors are entirely meritless and irrelevant by WP policy rather than by my observation or assertion. They should all be ignored.
Any deletion discussion that "was conducted on the grounds that as written, the article was a piece of junk..." or "the problem was that the article, as written, was a worthless piece of garbage..." is illegitimate (again WP:AADD). I am sure "we have lots of topics in Wikipedia where a bad early version got deleted" but your admission here that it is being done despite reliable sources and, in apparent violation of WP:N, WP:AADD,WP:CONTN, WP:NEXIST, WP:NRV, WP:SUSTAINED, and other policies is troubling.
Anyone can verify what was removed at the screen shot: Here. You said above that you personally already reviewed it.
With all due respect, your assessment and statements about what was deleted when compared with the screenshot are obviously untrue. You've alleged that the removed content:
"...did absolutely nothing whatsoever to demonstrate whether the topic was actually notable or not.
..."Orlando's Summer of Love" was a thing that happened, ended right there without containing so much as one comma of context for what it actually was or why an encyclopedia should care about it."
"...was failing to demonstrate the topic's potential notability at all."
As shown in that screenshot, the deleted stub article had a sentence with 50 words. The first 15 words state that the subject existed. The remaining 35 words clearly provided context and demonstrated why it is notable despite your assertion. In addition, that sentence contains no less than eight wikilinks to other Wikipedia Articles that demonstrate its relevance to WP and "goes to 15 separate footnotes that contained very large passages of text". WP:CITEKILL I know that you read them because you alleged some sort of WP:NFC copy violation for using them. See: WP:LONGQUOTE, "Longer quotations may be hidden in the reference as a WP:FOOTNOTE to facilitate verification by other editors without sacrificing readability."
Despite the "easy to facilitate verification" purpose of the WP:LONGQUOTE within the WP:FOOTNOTEand the fact that you personally reviewed them, the most ridiculous of the assertions above comes in the WP:REFBOMB link. That policy only applies to: "loading an article up with as many sources as possible without regard to whether they actually support substantive or noteworthy content about the topic. The deceptive goal here is to boost the number of footnotes present in the article as high as possible, in the hope that it will fool other editors into accepting the topic's notability without properly vetting the degree to which any given source is or isn't actually substantive, reliable, and about the subject."
Again, by claiming WP:REFBOMB you are challenging the notability of the subject despite asserting above that you haven't/aren't. The assertion is absurd given the quality of the sources that you admitted to reviewing and I'm have difficulty understanding why you did it again. The repeated false assertions in your comment appear to be an effort to mislead the community or prevent review of verifiable facts. Please alleviate these concerns.
Thank you Johnvr4 (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
REFBOMB is a completely correct assessment of what you were doing. You do not demonstrate that a topic is notable by stacking fifteen separate references onto a single sentence stating that it exists; you demonstrate that a topic is notable by using fifteen references to support several paragraphs of content. No statement in the article ever needs to have more than one reference for it, so if you have fifteen sources to support the topic's notability then you need to write at least fifteen sentences of content to justify them. And furthermore, you don't pack the entire text of a reference into the footnote tags by copying and pasting it; you cite the title, publisher and date of the content, but what it says about "Orlando's Summer of Love" needs to be summarized in body text rather than copy-pasted verbatim into the footnote.
There are many, many reasons besides notability alone why an article can still be deleted from Wikipedia — copyright violations, articles that just state that the subject exists while failing to actually explain why its existence might be noteworthy, and on and so forth — so just saying "but it's notable" is not an exemption from having to also be able to say "and I've written a good article to properly demonstrate that". Bearcat (talk) 19:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Bearcat, Again you ignore WP:GNG, WP:AADD or any policy guidance. Your repeated REFBOMB assertion of that any source was added by deception without regard to whether it actually supports substantive or noteworthy content about the topic in the hope that it will fool other editors into accepting the topic's notability while offering no evidence to alleviate the repeated falsehood concern that I raised about your assertions or even answer a simple question raised to you is more evidence of WP:DE.
Therefore, can you point to a single source in the screen shot where you have a legitimate concern that it does not actually support substantive or noteworthy content about the topic? YES or NO? follow up-which one(s)?
Please answer the question of whether new source alleviates the following concern as one reference was not enough before more were added: "Term coined by a single reporter is not notable enough for its own article" YES or NO? follow up-if NO, Why?
Any new article/draft would not be able to use one of the sources used as it is now a dead link. WP:PLRT allows use of the citation(s) and quote(s) but the remainder of that source article has been lost already. Restoration of the old stub would alleviate the predicament for this source which was illegitimately put in peril by the nominator.
Johnvr4 (talk) 20:37, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
I am not ignoring anything whatsoever — and I am, for the record, pretty close to the last person on Wikipedia whom you ever want to play the "I know Wikipedia policy better than you do" game. I've been around Wikipedia for more than 15 years now, and was directly involved in writing a lot of our policies and procedures — so trust me, you will never, ever win that game if you're playing it against me.
That said, you genuinely seem not to be understanding what I'm saying. So here it is again, in point form:
(1) You did not write a substantive or detailed article about "Orlando's Summer of Love" — you wrote one sentence about it, stating that the term exists but completely failing to say anything whatsoever about what it means or what effect it ever had on anything. In other words, literally the definition of "no substantive content".
(2) You then jengastacked that single sentence with 15 separate footnotes that were adding nothing but redundant reverification that the term exists, and still did not add any content to the article to expand the article into more than just a single sentence stating that the term exists. In other words, literally the definition of "reference bombing".
(3) Most of those references, further, copied and pasted the entire text of the source in a very clear violation of our copyright rules, and thus had to be deleted on those grounds regardless of any notability or sourcing concerns.
And wherever you're getting this "Term coined by a single reporter is not notable enough for its own article" thing from, it is not a thing I ever said, and it is not a thing anybody else who participated in the deletion discussion ever said. Whatever else might have been said to you somewhere other than the deletion discussion, by somebody who did not participate in the deletion discussion, is completely irrelevant to the matter of whether the deletion discussion was properly conducted or not. So that is not a point I have any responsibility to address, apologize for or even consider — if you even mention it again you're getting a 24-hour editblock for being disruptive, because it has nothing to do with the AFD discussion.
And GNG, incidentally, is not just "count the footnotes and keep anything that has more than two". GNG is not just a raw number of footnotes, but takes a lot of other things into account including context, range and depth. If you believe the sources support substantive content about the topic, then the onus is on you to write substantive content.
As I explained above: if you believe you can do better than the first attempt, you are absolutely free to do that. But the original version was correctly deleted by an AFD discussion that was entirely correct on policy grounds, and we do not have to overturn it before you're allowed to try again. Bearcat (talk) 21:17, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
This isn't a forum for debating the article content. Hut 8.5 21:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Bearcat, You are literally ignoring everything--especially those questions directly asked to you about the changes required for any similar content. Your alleged work creating and familiarity with these rules polices, combined with an obvious inability to remotely follow or even point to any of them to support your reasoning in any comment only serves to lessen the legitimacy of your argument(s) and supports my accusation of your own WP:DE in this thread. Your apparent credibility here is lacking based solely upon your responses to me above. Now you accuse me of "playing games" and again repeat three assertions which I have already accused you of lying to the community about and that have been proven untrue or would be proven to be untrue by a simple glance at the screenshot by anyone.
Now in your haste to edit block, please 24-hour edit block yourself. I have never once accused you of making edit #768073072 on 3 March 2017 that led to the merge and deletion discussions/nominations. Respectfully, that threat is unfounded and frankly kind of idiotic. For your own clarity, I mention it again: In perfect English above, I say that the "coined by one author" concern was the original complaint and that it was made by another editor. And here too: User_talk:Malcolmxl5#Orlando's_Summer_of_Love I state the same thing and give the name of that editor...
That you either refuse or are unable comprehend these messages is not really a point I have any responsibility to address, apologize, for or even consider unless my accusation of WP:DE is not taken seriously or you attempt to edit block me in any way what-so-ever. A certain basic [[WP:Competence] and courtesy is required to participate here. Again, you as the involved nomination editor absolutely do have responsibility to address and consider the initial and probably the only valid concern that first led to the merge and/or delete nomination/discussion(s) that you subsequently made. None of the concerns raised in nomination by you or anyone was a valid policy-based argument. I've pretty much shown that they were all just a bunch of meritless votes and WP:AADDs. You should probably apologize to me for the threat too.
Pretty please answer the question(s) already posed to you and cite the WP:N or WP:GNG parts or sections the of the guideline that you are concerned was not already met or surpassed by that one sentence and its 15 (plus a new one) sources. The onus is on you to not delete notable topics that have sources (not content) that well demonstrate a topics notability--precisely as it states at WP:GNG and in every subsection below!
I've spent literally all day asking you the same increasing simple questions--Which you won't answer! If that is not an example of WP:DE, then I don't know what is. I just can't simplify or dumb this down any further than the applicable policy and the yes/no questions already provided to you. Johnvr4 (talk) 00:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
I am literally ignoring nothing; everything I have told you here is 100 per cent correct about the way our policies actually work. GNG does not mean "as soon you've shown X number of sources, the article gets kept even if it's so badly written that it fails to provide even the most basic explanation of what the topic actually is", and articles most certainly can be deleted for quality or copyright issues quite separate from notability assessments anyway. Secondly, if you have "never once accused me of making edit #768073072 on 3 March 2017", then why do you keep asking me to answer for it as if I did? I have no responsibility to answer for anything except the things I said, and at no time in this entire affair have I ever said anything that was even slightly incorrect about either (a) the quality of the article as it stood at the time of deletion, or (b) the way our policies work.
EOD on this end. You do not have my permission to speak to me, or about me, any more in relation to this matter. Answer C.Fred's question below, or drop the stick and walk away. Bearcat (talk) 01:48, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  • To borrow a phrase from aviation... @Johnvr4: say intentions. What is the outcome you want from this discussion?
  1. If you want the article history restored to draft space for you to work on a new version, then say so.
  2. If you want permission to create anew article, you already have it.
  3. If you feel the AfD was closed improperly, then WP:DRV is where you need to make that appeal, not here.
I don't see any other reason why this discussion should continue here—and frankly, I'm ready to ask an uninvolved party to close this discussion. —C.Fred (talk) 00:31, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Bearcat As I've previously answered User:C.Fred's now-repeated questions, days ago, above as well as providing these answers [User_talk:Bearcat#Orlando's_Summer_of_Love_discussion|in the message on your talk page that brought you here], I'm not sure why I actually need to respond your demand to answer it again (Really, just read the comments already!)-and especially in the face of your utter refusal and ignoring my direct questions to you--which still need answers:
  • Can you point to a single source in the screen shot where you have a legitimate concern that the source does not actually support substantive or noteworthy content about this topic? YES or NO? follow up-if YES which one(s)?
  • Does the new source alleviate the following concern as one reference was not enough before more were added: "Term coined by a single reporter is not notable enough for its own article" YES or NO? follow up-if NO, Why?
As stated repeatedly, the Additional sources were added as only as a result of an editor questioning notability of the topic when it was citing a single source. Additional sources were added which was basically a WP:CITEBOMB for editors to facilitate verification. user:Bearcat demonstrated, a sustained, and disruptive inability to verify that any source used covers this topic and ridiculously kept calling it WP:REFBOMB-which are only for sources with trivial or no relation to the subject. He is not the policy expert that he claims to be above because he is simply incapable of verifying a topic in a source under WP:GNG or pointing to a single rule for support of his concern. It's also apparent that he doesn't seem to understand the basic differences between a WP:CITEBOMB and a WP:REFBOMB and it shows!.
User:Bearcat's concerns-at least every single one of them raised to date, can be rightfully ignored. I do think his apparent incompetence here is feigned but also I do not think anything relevant to WP policy or productive will come from him on this issue. I think it is pretty clear that he is only here to disrupt any discussion about the clarification and restoration that I seek to improve a previously deleted entry on this topic.
C.Fred, (re-)Stating my intentions... As previously stated above I offer you both this copy-paste quote: "Of course my intent is to improve the stub or new page draft or whatever. However, I'm just not understanding the previous WP:GNG concerns at AfD or any of the concerns questioning whether these sources support GNG of this era, in this place, as well the naming of the era as "Orlando's summer of love" and whether the new source alleviates the following concern as one reference was not enough before more were added:
"Term coined by a single reporter is not notable enough for its own article."
As previously stated to you above (quote continues), "Any new or improved article will have to include restatement and WP:CITETRIM of the exact same deleted, but highly reputable, reliable and verifiable information on the subject and will cite the exact same sources plus any others I find that were not included previously."
"If the deleted information is to be included, I would first need to present the evidence (here I've presented actual proof) to show these sources are are adequate for WP:GNG and that all previous concerns that led to deletion at AfD were meritless."
C.Fred, Unfortunately I'm afraid cannot follow the advice that I previously solicited from you (But I do thank you for it anyway) as it would violate WP:CONTN as well as the other polices I described in response to your advice.
  1. I do not want the history restored yet, I am going to want the content restored if there was no valid reason to delete it or nominate it for deletion in the first place.
  2. I do not want to create a new article because it is still unclear exactly what needs to change except further expansion and WP:CITETRIM and (quote) "Any new article/draft would not be able to use one of the sources used as it is now a dead link. WP:PLRT allows use of the citation(s) and quote(s) but the remainder of that source article has been lost already. Restoration of the old stub would alleviate the predicament for this source which was illegitimately pet in peril by the nominator."
  3. Last, I do feel AfD was improper and I have shown that is the case however, I am going to wait for a response from the deleting editor. I'd like his review of the above evidence to show that every concern raised at Afd was meritless per policy. If that fails to restore the content for improvement, then that editor can clarify exactly what needs to change regarding notability as shown by the available sources on the subject or I can take all this nonsense to DRV. I just don't understand why I need to given the sources I have provided in the stub prior to deletion and here after.
Thank you,Johnvr4 (talk) 04:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Hut 8.5, Please restore the content and page history and merge per the result of discussion here: Talk:Orlando,_Florida#Merger_proposal. As stated above, the new source put forth addresses the concern raised there. The subsequent Afd discussion was only initiated after and then closed before this discussion ended in merge. As shown below, the concerns brought forth at Afd were entirely meritless and were never remotely policy-based. Please help me determine which discussion outcome has merit (or the most merit) or should be upheld and which discussion outcome (if any) we should ignore. Last, Is WP:DRV appropriate to request overturning a merge? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnvr4 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
The assertion that a more substantial article is a WP article requirement violates WP:AADD#Article size and WP:STUB among others.
The assertion that that any of these fifteen (now sixteen) reliable sources are not significant coverage of the subject to demonstrate WP:N is also an example of Tendentious_editing#Disputing_the_reliability_of_apparently_good_sources.
IMHO, the question now is whether or not the notable subject era should--per two sources separated by 20 years--be titled under the topic "Orlando's Summer of Love" or something else. Johnvr4 (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
@Johnvr4: WP:DRV is the right forum for trying to overturn the results of deletion discussions, which appears to be what you're asking for here. I can't just overturn the AfD because you disagree with it, or even if I disagree with it, because AfD results are supposed to represent the result of community consensus and not just one person's opinion. If you want the page to be restored because of a procedural irregularity (e.g. the previous merge discussion result) then DRV is the right forum for that as well. Hut 8.5 17:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974–76)

These pages were incredibly useful to the RPG community because the original books containing the info are long out of print and inaccessible to most players. The info from the editions released in the 70s is not the same as the current edition. It's notable as it's a major part of D&D, one of the most culturally important and historical tabletop RPGs written. If the page can't be permanently restored, please at least make the article's data temporarily available for download, otherwise it will likely be completely lost to a large percentage of players who utilized it. —12.106.168.148 (talk) 17:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

While I sympathise, Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 19:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sheena Parveen

I, Sheena5486, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sheena5486 (talk) 16:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment: Please see WP:COI. Editors should not be editing articles about themselves. — Ched (talk) 20:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

TechnoArt LIVE

I'm willing to do changes needed and delete any copyright violations in the document —PesTenamo (talk) 18:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@PesTenamo: We don't restore copyright violations, so the better course of action is to start a new (draft of the) article that doesn't contain infringements. —C.Fred (talk) 20:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Sheena Parveen

We would like to correct the citation errors —Sheena5486 (talk) 16:12, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment: There is no such article. See above about the draft. —C.Fred (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:FCP Euro/alt

I, Alex at FCPEuro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Alex at FCPEuro (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

 Comment: please see WP:COI — Ched (talk) 20:10, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Unfollow the Rules

I, Another Believer, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Please restore the talk page as well. Thank you. --Another Believer (Talk) 13:44, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}.
@Another Believer: Please make sure to demonstrate the album is notable--which may be hard to do if the title isn't even confirmed yet. —C.Fred (talk) 20:14, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Brian Pinkney

I, Sjbarbarian, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sjbarbarian (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. —C.Fred (talk) 20:16, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

User:Flickyard/sandbox

I, Flickyard, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Flickyard (talk) 21:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/An Introduction To DCP

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —MZ 21:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC) An Introduction to DCP. Not published previously. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mateenzar (talk • contribs) 21:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done I'm going to decline this one after reviewing the deleted text. Frankly, there's enough self-promotion in there that it could be deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, blatant promotion. —C.Fred (talk) 21:54, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Catch 23

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Sharnadogg (talk) 21:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm guessing that's the page in question. —C.Fred (talk) 21:55, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Sharnadogg: You will need to show additional work by the band or coverage of the band in reliable sources to bring this up to article grade. Draft space is not for the indefinite hosting of material that doesn't qualify for an article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:57, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Jewish Immigrant Aid Services

I still want to work on the draft, and I think it is a page that should exist —TimeEngineer (talk) 01:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 02:03, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Example

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) TimeEngineer (talk) 01:05, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

TimeEngineer, do you mean Laya Crust? – Muboshgu (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Joseph Annamkutty Jose

I, Ajimathew908, request the undeletion of this I would like to work for thus draft, I think it will be approved. draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ajimathew908 (talk) 03:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Ajimathew908: Make sure that you add reliable sources to the draft; the last review noted the draft was lacking them. —C.Fred (talk) 13:42, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cowgirl Magazine

I, Kamorosano, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kamorosano (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 15:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Midnight Cities

I, Mrgweder, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mrgweder (talk) 21:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Edwin Alexander Smalls

I, Snesnow, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Snesnow (talk) 14:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Aahvaan

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —47.29.11.110 (talk) 14:49, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Unge Ferrari

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) M1N5TR3L (talk) 13:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Raltsevich

I, CRB, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CRB (talk) 07:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Omar Ammache

I, Nehme1499, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nehme1499 (talk) 11:11, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:43, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft: TNO

I, Reneeshdonga, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reneeshdonga (talk) 12:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Arijit Das

I, Sudhabindudas2012, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sudhabindudas2012 (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:SEE-FIM Protocol

I, 50.234.189.31, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.234.189.31 (talk) 19:40, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:41, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hattie Longstreet Price

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:48, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Strawberry Plains Audubon Center

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

North Road Records

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this article. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Planning to redirect to Dave Mallett. If it needs to be moved to draft space before I redirect it that's fine. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:30, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – Muboshgu (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Walter Craven

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List_of_commercial_failures_in_video_hosting

I, Handroid7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Handroid7 (talk) 23:24, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Please restore it into my user name space. --Handroid7 (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you. –– –– Handroid7  02:14, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Mallett Brothers Band

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this article. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Planning to redirect to Dave Mallett#Legacy. Also would loke to see what was there. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done Article deleted by WP:PROD. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:56, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
"Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion.." (PROD)FloridaArmy (talk) 03:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:FloridaArmy/Mallett Brothers Band. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/NesC

The page describes an old programming language. It was deleted via PROD for "not being referenced". Still, the page is the only immediate information on DuckDuckGo (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nesc). —193.171.243.173 (talk) 17:50, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

If it isn't referenced, then we should not have it, full stop. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 18:08, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:George Herscu

I, Libanius, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Libanius (talk) 07:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Patricia Coffie

I, ThatMontrealIP, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Userfying is also OK.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Shelley Stamp

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Culbreath Heights

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Joe Rosenthal

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:11, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Hal Clements

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:12, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Giuseppe Ragona

I need to change content to make independently verifiable —Hjuma (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

@Hjuma: This would be the third time the draft would get restored. What has changed with Ragona that is likely to get his article accepted now? Draft space is not for the indefinite hosting of material. —C.Fred (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Crown Oil Ltd

I request that this article be undeleted so that I may edit it and improve it to Wikipedia's standards —PanaMarkides (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. —C.Fred (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Danish & Dawar

A couple phrases could be a bit better, but this isn't written in a terribly promotional style. I'm not convinced it'd survive AfD but I'm not convinced it wouldn't -as I'm great with evaluating Indian sources —219.90.106.201 (talk) 13:57, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Termux

I, Nealmcb, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Note also https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Glow_oli/Termux ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:07, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Note also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Termux but I think with growing interest we can clearly make the case for notability now. ★NealMcB★ (talk) 04:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Example

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) EvanVenn (talk) 13:24, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

iatrogenic botulism

I, Talkingfun, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Talkingfun (talk) 23:43, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

iatrogenic botulism

work in progress —Talkingfun (talk) 23:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Paris Métro Line 16

The article was redirected in 2016. At the time the line was only a project. Now the construction of the line is well under way for an opening in 2024, with construction of the western stations of the line and launch of tunnel boring machines to dig the tunnel. See here for instance. —Hektor (talk) 12:18, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

NeoReach

Deleting administrator is "presently taking a semi-break from Wikipedia" and "considering semi-retirement" according to their talk page. A Wikipedia alert on their page notifies that they are mostly inactive and thus unable to process an undeletion request or respond to the inquiry posted about it. There is not clear indication why the NeoReach page was deleted and, if not valid case can be given, the page should be restored. In the event that a valid case is presented, I request the opportunity to make the necessary edits to the page to restore its presence on Wikipedia as a source of information for the general public. Thank you. —Studentsearching (talk) 02:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

94.24.85.136

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —94.24.85.136 (talk) 04:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

You will have to tell us what you want 94.24.85.136, as you have no deleted contributions to aid a guess. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Automated Pain Recognition

I, Sascha Gruss, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sascha Gruss (talk) 12:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Automated Pain Recognition

The article will be revised and new references (secondary sources) will be added —Sascha Gruss (talk) 12:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

 Done Dup request. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cardano (cryptocurrency platform)

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) IOHKwriter (talk) 16:01, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Cardano (cryptocurrency platform)

Draft talk:Cardano (cryptocurrency platform)

This page has been worked on continuously for the past 9 months and contains research material that is valuable to me and others —IOHKwriter (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

The Great Adventure (The Neal Morse Band album)

I, 136.223.34.8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 136.223.34.8 (talk) 16:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

I speedy deleted this as U1 as one of my own user pages that I no longer needed at the time (I've been renamed since). Please restore and move (without redirect) to User:Voice of Clam/mainlinks, as I'll be using it again for AWB. Thanks. —— O Still Small Voice of Clam 16:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Wireless Society of Southern Maine

I, Kb1hnz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kb1hnz (talk) 18:21, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering

Want to edit and fix problems to get it approved —Ktodi13 (talk) 19:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Richard Herman (lawyer)

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) NewAmerica101 (talk) 21:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

This page is not deleted. It was deleted but it was restored a week ago after a request on this page. Hut 8.5 21:25, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Coolbet

I, Bkannes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bkannes (talk) 11:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:55, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:David Březina (type designer)

I, Balloonacy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Balloonacy (talk) 16:14, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Template:Platysternidae

Will extend template to include extinct genera. —Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 01:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

@Sun Creator: This was deleted via Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 March 1#Template:Platysternidae. Have you contacted the admin who deleted the page, JJMC89? —C.Fred (talk) 01:43, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
No I have not. I thought the process was to raise it here. Regards, Sun Creator(talk) 01:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rewari

I, 222.164.212.168, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 04:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Oyinkansola Alabi

The page has a number of sources in many of the most credible frontline newspapers in Nigeria. These sources are INDEPENDENT. —169.159.64.244 (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oyinkansola Alabi, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Lectonar (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Booky Oren

I, Ovedc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ovedc (talk) 14:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial.
@Ovedc: Normally I would say to just start from scratch, but given the concerns about your conflict of interest in the deleted version, it is probably better to let an independent editor write the article rather than to have you start a new version. —C.Fred (talk) 14:55, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Dear C.Fred, I am fully understand both the reasons you specified above, but I would like to ask you to copy the deleted draft to User:Ovedc/sandbox2, so I could write the all article from the beginning, with at least the sources already in proper Wiki-Grammar. Thanks a lot! Ovedc (talk) 09:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
@Ovedc: As I stated before, creating a new article is best left to an independent editor, not one with a conflict of interest. You may want to contact Orangemike, the deleting admin, since G11 deletions are outside the scope of this page. —C.Fred (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Horhe Anhel Livraga Rizi (Jorge Angel Livraga Rizzi)

I, Irdisdomnori, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Irdisdomnori (talk) 12:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 14:25, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

sisa bauksit

Sisa bauksit · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

On 00:23, 24 December 2015 Mark Arsten talk contribs deleted page Sisa bauksit (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND).

This was part of the the ETN REDMUD team translation effort back in 2015, with teams contributing to the translation and active science dissemination of red mud in different languages, for the main article branch entitled "Bauxite tailings". I would like to request the reinstation of the deleted translation of said page in the Malay Language. I did not receive notification of this and was not aware of the deletion before. There is Bahasa Indonesia option but no Bahasa Melayu translated option and the "Sisa Bauksit" translates in a more detailed and accurate level for people who are versed in Malay language. Please kindly reinstate this page thank you. I am the Malay language translator and have the previous edit source of article as well in case it cannot be retrieved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pritiitam (talk • contribs) 13:11, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:FCP Euro/alt

I, MasterHachiRoku, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MasterHachiRoku (talk) 20:04, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

 Not done because the requester is a sockpuppet created to evade COI/PAID concerns on their old account. ST47 (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:FCP Euro

I, MasterHachiRoku, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MasterHachiRoku (talk) 20:05, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

 Not done because the requester is a sockpuppet created to evade COI/PAID concerns on their old account. ST47 (talk) 20:35, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

AutaBuy Magazine

This is the page for our company, who has been a leader in the classic automotive advertising space for over 20 years. —Jarrodpage (talk) 21:39, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done Your comment implies a conflict of interest. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kyoto eSports

I, 66.108.86.102, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.108.86.102 (talk) 21:58, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Jet Black Stare

Band has an allmusic bio, charted single on Billboard, and in-depth writeup in Deseret News. I think there's enough for an article to be maintained. —Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 10:28, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Nicolas Sadirac

If you go on Google, you see a lot of articles concerning this gentleman on famous newspapers like this one : https://www.challenges.fr/education/le-fondateur-de-l-ecole-42-veut-former-un-million-de-jeunes_643708 ; (Redacted) —2A01:CB00:B51:3E00:C4FC:941F:5E33:9889 (talk) 07:25, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicolas Sadirac, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Larry Masinter

I, Creffett, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. creffett (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

(Could you restore this to my userspace? There's a new draft on the topic and I want to see if there are any useful sources in the previous version)

User:Sabalbhati

I dont know why delete my user page. i am here sinse 2009, but don't violations agenst wikipedia policy. may be my password hacked and post anything. sorry. please undelete my user page —Sabalbhati (talk) 17:29, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:32, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

The Establishment (Pakistan)

Apologies, for I am not sure if I am using the correct procedure. Please read my comment on this link here and kindly undelete the namespace for me to expand/work on. Thanks. —222.164.212.168 (talk) 18:51, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Disorder Records

This was a small record label from years ago. My info is first hard from Frank Portman, he was owner. He used it as a way to mail order albums and put out music.

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Xoloz (talk · contribs)) instead. First-hand information is not an acceptable source, especially from someone tied to the subject. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 19:46, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Sri Jayanta Barua

Sri Jayanta Barua is renowned journalist.he is owner of Asomiya pratidin, pratidin time. l have taken all information from very credible source which are in public domain.If you are filling that anything in the page was promotion please tell me. I want to improve this page as per policy of Wikipedia {{Moshaddique (talk) 14:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moshaddique (talk • contribs) 14:40, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Bbb23 (talk · contribs)) instead. Press releases, name-drops, interviews, and quotables are not acceptable sources when it comes to notability per Wikipedia's definition. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 19:49, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Compatibility of PDE

G13; I am not the creator. It is not clear whether the content is worth keeping (as it is not accessible) —Taku (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Momčilo Rašo

I, Berin K, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Berin K (talk) 19:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:04, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Suicidal Wedding

Old draft that I wish to restore. —Standardwikiman (talk) 19:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:What We Do in the Shadows (franchise)

I, DisneyMetalhead, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DisneyMetalhead (talk) 03:59, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

  • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:05, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Pablo Artal

OTRS permission (revision undeletion requested) —Krd 08:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Withdrawn. --Krd 10:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
When the OTRS request goes in it is a bit early to ask for undeletion, as many times the copyright granted is unsuitable. However when the OTRS agent sees the request they are welcome to ask here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:57, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Al Pancho

OTRS permission —Krd 07:42, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Withdrawn. --Krd 10:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Not done Withdrawn request. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Christian Francis Roth

OTRS permission —Krd 08:03, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

  • We will need evidence of that from an OTRS volunteer, with a case number. And the volunteer must prove they are one, with what the OTRS proves, eg that a copyright violation is not there because .... Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:07, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Withdrawn. --Krd 10:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Not done Withdrawn request. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:25, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kickin' It On the Creek

I, Cbes222, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cbes222 (talk) 11:53, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Antonio Caronia

I was going to complete it but it has been deleted —Xname (talk) 16:18, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:27, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Timothy Bos Bullock

This page was deleted because there was a claim Mr. Bullock was not notable enough. His career spans over 15 years with several Billboard hits and has Grammy nominations. Both Billboard and Grammy affiliations affirm a producer, artist or songwriter as notable. They are coveted accolades that Mr. Bullock has achieved numerous times. I did not see any specific requirements within Wikipedia for ‘notability.’ However, within the Music Industry, someone with Billboard hits with Mainstream artists (artists who have sold millions of records and have millions of fans), and Grammy nominations are considered notable. Kindly requesting his page be restored please. Neither administrators that supported the deletion or nominated the deletion provided any Wikipedia reference of what determines notability for this site, but did say the article wasn’t being deleted for being unverified. If the article is verifiable with sources, I do not see a justified cause for deletion. Thank you for your time and favorable consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Livinmydestiny (talk • contribs) 23:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 00:09, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Also, if you didn't see "any specific requirements [...] for 'notability'" then you weren't looking hard enough. —v^_^v Make your position clear! 18:13, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Kornél Kovács

(This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Aronstrandberg (talk) 17:26, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Danielle Younge-Ullman

I, Clovermoss, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Clovermoss (talk) 20:27, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:06, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Muboshgu I moved the article to mainspace as I think it's suitable for inclusion as an article, is that okay? Clovermoss (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Clovermoss, I don't think that was the best idea, as evidenced by the deletion discussion. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
Muboshgu Just wanted to provide an update. The nomination was withdrawn and the two votes before that were keeps. Clovermoss (talk) 18:34, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Harry Lewis

I, Brojam, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brojam (talk) 22:10, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Prabal Kumar Basu

Move this to Draft talk:Prabal Kumar Basu after restoring. The talk page was left behind. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Harry Lewis (youtuber)

I, Brojam, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brojam (talk) 05:44, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Natasha Ginwala

I, Fiiibi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fiiibi (talk) 14:41, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:RAUC

I, Ejoerns, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ejoerns (talk) 23:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:55, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Object Oriented Industrial Programming

I, 98.244.232.231, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.244.232.231 (talk) 01:01, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/Archive_343&oldid=1195673136"