User talk:Sedaray

Alexis Krasilovsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

License tagging for File:Phyllis Krasilovsky.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Phyllis Krasilovsky.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Phyllis Krasilovsky.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Phyllis Krasilovsky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:56, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was sent this file by Phyllis's daughter who scanned it from personal photos - Phyllis died. It was shot in 1951, photographer dead. This is what her Mom wanted put up. I said that when I uploaded it.

And how do it upload to Articles for creation/Phyllis Krasilovsky when it "doesn't exist" as an article? The family also sent me a book cover but the upload wizard won't let me upload because "the article doesn't exist" - catch-22!Sedaray (talk) 02:37, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Phyllis_Krasilovsky.jpg

Given to me by Krasilovsky family with permission for this page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Phyllis_Krasilovsky Your wizard says it's an orphan but it's not, it's been commented out. But I have permission - her daughter scanned it and sent it with instructions to use this instead of the recent picture we had. Phyllis is dead, the photographer is dead, the photo is from 1951 headshot. What do I do?

And they sent a book cover but the uploader says the article does not exist - it does, but hasn't been approved yet.

Sedaray (talk) 02:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Contact us/Photo submission answers your question regarding the permission. Bjelleklang - talk 08:06, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phyllis Krasilovsky (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Phyllis Krasilovsky.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Samwalton9 (talk) 12:58, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sedaray, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I'm confused. My article was rejected because she wasn't famous enough. Re: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Phyllis_Krasilovsky

The New York Times wrote an obit, she wrote at least 20 books, international awards, I also found a Ladies' Home Journal on Archive.org with 3 articles featuring her which I have added. How could that make her less famous than the illustrators of her books which I found? (who did not get NYT obits). She seems pretty famous to me. Related to this, I can't seem to get a picture up - catch-22 the wizard wants an article name, but since the article isn't approved, the wizard won't let me put the picture up. I didn't have this problem before. One photo was an outtake of the LHJ magazine shoot above, another is a personal photo from the family, but without an article name the wizard won't take it. Is the lack of the photo the reason the article isn't accepted? Sedaray (talk) 09:54, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The submission was declined because its references did not adequately indicate notability of its subject. Unfortunately, in my opinion the sheer quantity of guidelines on what constitutes notability is grossly excessive, and I think it would be a great improvement to simplify the whole issue and reduce it to about 5% of its current extent, but the most relevant guideline sections in this case are the general notability guideline and the guideline on creative professionals. If you read those, you will see that Wikipedia's concept of "notability" is not entirely the same as being "famous". However, the issue was not so much whether Phyllis Krasilovsky was notable enough to be the subject of an article, but whether your references showed that she was, and, having checked them, I have to agree that they didn't. I have added a couple more references, and done a little cleaning up of the article. In my opinion, it now just about has enough evidence of notability, though more would help, so I have accepted the submission. Uploading images can be a bewildering and frustrating experience if you are not used to it, with various possible pitfalls. I suggest that you try again, now that there is an article at Phyllis Krasilovsky. If you still have difficulties, feel welcome to contact me on my talk page, and I will try to help if I can. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:42, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Regarding the orphaned file "Phyllis Krasilovsky" - this is a b&w headshot I would like to use in the Wiki article "Phyllis Krasilovsky". I have a pdf letter from Meredith Publishing of 'no objection' (their term) to using an outtake from "Ladies Home Journal" Mar 1951, p188 -"How America Lives: hair do's and don'ts", photographer unknown. The photo in question has been framed on the office wall of her husband William M. Krasilovsky since that time. Phyllis died recently and I would like to upload the photo, maybe under the category of 'historical photo of a dead person for the purpose of identification in a Wiki article'. I don't know how to up upload a pdf for proof. I found the magazine full issue in archive.org so it may be in commons, but this photo is an unpublished outtake. This is the email from Meredith Publishing with the letter attached:

"I was unable to determine who the photographer of the photo is. Attached you will find the permission letter for the material you requested. you're free to post the image on the website. Please let me know if you have any questions or need anything else.

Thank you. Vivian

Vivian Santangelo, Copyrights and Contracts Meredith Corporation – Reuse and Permissions (Redacted)" Sedaray (talk) 07:21, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Sedaray[reply]

Now I am not sure that you want to re-upload the file File:Phyllis Krasilovsky.jpg, or if you are talking about a different image. If File:Phyllis Krasilovsky.jpg is the image you wish to use, you will have to get the copyright holder (presumably a member of the family, as the image appears to be a work for hire) to send a permission email to the OTRS team using the instructions at WP:consent. That's because an image that's never been published before does not qualify for fair use. However, the above remarks indicated that you wish to upload instead an image that appeared in the Ladies Home Journal in March 1951. The procedure would be different in that case, since the image was previously published and qualifies for fair use. -- Diannaa (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William M. Krasilovsky/dump later

Hello Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "William M. Krasilovsky/dump later".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William M. Krasilovsky/dump later}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William M. Krasilovsky

Hello Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "William M. Krasilovsky".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:William M. Krasilovsky}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:William M. Krasilovsky concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:William M. Krasilovsky, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:William M. Krasilovsky

Hello, Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "William M. Krasilovsky".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:William M. Krasilovsky}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:27, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Let Them Eat Cake, from its old location at User:Sedaray/sandbox/Let Them Eat Cake. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 11:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let Them Eat Cake (October 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eddie891 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

If this were to be approved, it would need disambiguation

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let Them Eat Cake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:LTECPoster1092013.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:LTECPoster1092013.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:58, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DAB page fixes

I had to reach back into the history quite a ways to repair Let them eat cake (disambiguation). Your instincts about adding the disambiguator were correct, if there were an article for the documentary. I think it just looks redundant, but I can understand the reasoning at MOS:DABPIPE. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on Draft:Let Them Eat Cake, but I need help to rename the page Let Them Eat Cake (film) so it's clear - or (video) or (documentary) or my favorite (documentary film) whichever seems appropriate. I hope I signed this right Sedaray (talk) 08:13, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Signing looked almost okay, remember to indent, and you should prefer to use wikilinks rather than full URL links. I hope my cleanups are welcome.

As I said on IRC, there's no need for you to rename (move) the page to include the disambiguator. Adding the disambiguator (the word or words in parentheses at the end of the title of the article) is the responsibility of the reviewer who accepts the draft. Focus on references to establish notability. That's what matters most. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:35, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LTECPoster1092013.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LTECPoster1092013.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie)

Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the followup to the discussion taking place at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie).

The {{db-author}} page displays a deletion notice at the top as an example, not because the template itself is to be deleted.
As we discussed before, the accepting reviewer of Draft:Let Them Eat Cake will decide what the final name of the article will be, including supplying an appropriate "(film)" or "(documentary film)" or whatever parenthetical disambiguator is needed. You are not helping the process by trying to offer "(movie)" as a suggestion and the creation of Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie) was botched by copying the rendered text instead of the source text. One way to clean this up would have been to delete the botched page (which is what my nomination was intended to start the process on). As the only contributor to the page (my template message doesn't count), you can still request deletion as the author by placing {{subst:db-author|rationale=mistakenly created page}} at the top of the page or something similar – and that would be my first preference for what you should do.
Repeating parameters in infoboxes has the effect of erasing previous values of the parameter, so your multiple use of producer= was leaving you with only the last-named producer. There's a template named {{hlist}} that is the normal way to achieve what you were trying to do. But make the changes on Draft:Let Them Eat Cake, please.
Once the MfD discussion closes, and if you haven't requested deletion, I was proposing to replace the content of Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (movie) with a redirect to Draft:Let Them Eat Cake. This is the lower-impact version of cleaning up the current situation that SmokeyJoe was recommending.

So, in conclusion, you do not need to do anything about this situation at all, but if you want to have the busted page deleted, I'm all in favor. Meanwhile, all this fuss has distracted us from the process of bringing Draft:Let Them Eat Cake up to the standard of notability and referencing that would get it accepted as an article. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! Sedaray (talk) 05:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion discussion has been closed. Sedaray, sorry for the bureaucratic flailing. @Jmcgnh: your positive attitude has been refreshing here; I wish more of us editors were like you. VQuakr (talk) 01:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let Them Eat Cake (November 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tikuko was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Of the sources given, only one actually mentions the documentary in their award listings. Additionally the Response section is essentially just the advertising from a movie poster.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let Them Eat Cake and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TKK! bark with me! 13:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Let Them Eat Cake concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Let Them Eat Cake, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Let Them Eat Cake

Hello, Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Let Them Eat Cake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 12:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

what is "db-afc, db-draft, or db-g13 code"?

You said to continue to edit my rejected submission I should remove the db-afc, db-draft, or db-g13 code, but I don't see those terms anywhere on the page.

When I type these terms into this letter with the brackets I get the big pink boxes with wiki comments. But below those afc codes in the submission are instructions "do not remove this line". I took a chance and removed them, hoping to get my draft back for more work.

Thank you. Sedaray (talk) 08:36, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Let Them Eat Cake

Hello, Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Let Them Eat Cake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 22:26, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film) (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JMHamo was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JMHamo (talk) 14:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Let-Them-Eat-Cake-documentary.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Let-Them-Eat-Cake-documentary.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film)

Hello, Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Let Them Eat Cake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sedaray, I have restored the draft based on your request at Requests for Undeletion. If you have an external connection with the film, the filmmakers, or their family, on whom you have written articles or drafts, you have a WP:Conflict of interest and will have to disclose the same. See WP:DISCLOSE for details, or you can message me if you require help. Thanks. Jay 💬 07:06, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Let Them Eat Cake (2014 film)

Hello, Sedaray. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Let Them Eat Cake".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:11, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]