Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/December 2020

Keep

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 19 December 2020 (UTC) [1].

---

List of national anthems

Notified: WikiProject Countries & WikiProject Songs

I am nominating this for featured list removal because... It has no lead, failing point 2 of the list criteria. Furthermore, it only has 30 refs, half of which are in the "Introduction" rather than at each national anthem, failing point 3. Skjoldbro (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

• Comment WP:SOFIXIT. References in the wrong place in the list can easily be moved. If there isn't one, the article on each remaining anthem should have a reference. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:39, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Already created a lede, moved all of the refs out of the main section and supplied others from their articles. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
    • Finished up to Finland and we're at 100 refs. Many were taken from the linked articles, but several are not well sourced or do not have RSes, so I used The CIA World Fact Book. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:33, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
• Comment: Walter Görlitz has done excellent work on this, but we need a reference for each entry at a minimum. I believe that without critical commentary, the categorisation at the bottom of anthems by key is trivia, so should be removed. (The alternative is to replace it with thoroughly sourced prose analysis in the lead of which keys are most common and why. But even this may be better suited to National anthem, which is where I recommend the excellent image is moved to.) If these two things are done then I support keeping the list; otherwise, I support removal. — Bilorv (talk) 20:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
  • These concerns have now been addressed, except that Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, Somaliland and South Ossetia still lack references in the table. Spotchecks done on a couple of entries but Transnistria isn't verified by the given citation (it only gives a different English translation of the anthem name, not the composer, date etc.). — Bilorv (talk) 14:17, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
    • @Bilorv: I have added refs for those you listed. Aza24 (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
      • Keep: outstanding work by both Walter Görlitz and Aza24 has brought this up to current FL standards. — Bilorv (talk) 22:03, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
• Comment This list does include some outdated phrasing such as "This table includes" and needs rewording. Also for some reason "Note: This list is for those who have declared independence and are partially recognized." is not actually a note, but a sentence in the lead to the table? This page is showing its age. Mattximus (talk) 15:24, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
• Delist per all. There are plenty of LEADCITEs. The "Key" table can likely be merged in the main table if it isn't crufty, and the orange tag has been up since Septemner 2018. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 22:58, 22 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per Aza24; good job with the work! – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 23:12, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
• Delist swaths of unsourced text in table "National anthems of UN member states and observer states". That alone is enough to delist. @Walter Görlitz: do you have an update? Therapyisgood (talk) 02:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
  • So are you to say you commented without checking? The refs are now half done. WP:NOTIMELIMIT Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:48, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
• Delist per Therapyisgood --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 21:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Delist per above.

~ HAL333 15:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

• Comment - if those above can give me a day or so I'm gonna take a crack at tidying it up Aza24 (talk) 19:49, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

---

• @Walter Görlitz, Skjoldbro, Mattximus, John M Wolfson, Therapyisgood, Guerillero, and HAL333: Aplogies for pinging you all, but seeing as the article has drastically changed in referencing I figured it was appropriate. I have now put references for every country, a lot of them from their official government websites, or a news source based in the country, but when I couldn't find any of these, I used CIA factbook or the very helpful anthem encyclopedia. I have (perhaps boldly) removed the key table entirely, since I have found that many of the countries on it seem to be placed in the wrong section, and it is completely unsourced. Also, imo it seems unhelpful, in the sense that many of the anthems are often changed key depending on the performer or orchestration. (Orchestra playing it vs band vs choir etc) Anyways, I would appreciate any comments on the current state of the article, since it now seems close to being saved. Aza24 (talk) 22:53, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

• Thanks for finishing what I started. It looks better now. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

• @Walter Görlitz: Indeed. Your work had created a fabulous list and I felt bad seeing it demoted for a lack of references, glad I could help. Aza24 (talk) 01:24, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

My two concerns still have not been addressed, so I’m still leaning towards delist. Mattximus (talk) 01:26, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

@Mattximus: I've put the two notes in actual notes and removed the "this table includes" if that addresses it? Aza24 (talk) 04:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

yes much better, my concerns are addressed. Mattximus (talk) 16:08, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• The name in the "Lyricist" column needs to be sorted by last name in some instances. Ie Francis Scott Key should not sort as "Francis" but rather "Key". Template:Sort name could be used, although I don't know all the naming conventions for all the names.

• The table in the "Anthems of partially recognized states and territories" section should be sortable.
  • Done.

• What makes nationalanthems.info reliable?

• Several of the references need accessdates, ie 34 and 36.
  • Added for 34 and 36.

• Ref 50 does not appear to be in English. A trans title would be nice.

• Ref 57: no space before colon.
  • Fixed.

• Ref 94 is not in English.
  • Changed ref

• Citing the Factbook variously as www.cia.gov, The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency., and The World Factbook. CIA.
  • Fixed. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 12:05, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Right now I still support delisting. Therapyisgood (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

@Therapyisgood: I've been getting distracted with other things and didn't get a chance to go through many of the existing references (the ones there before I came to it), seemingly mostly where these issues arise from. Thanks for your comments, I'll work them out in the next few days – I'll probably tweak the lead around too, it could be better. Aza24 (talk) 01:15, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

@Guerillero and HAL333: This list has been worked on a bunch since June and some editors have flipped their !vote; are you still in favor of delisting? @Aza24: are you finished with Therapyisgood's comments? --PresN 14:41, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

• Yes. I go to the first entry on this list and see not an RS --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 14:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

@PresN: Shoot I completely forgot about this one. I'll get to it this weekend (hopefully), and if I haven't in the next 2–3 days feel free to delist since this one has been here a while. I've been meaning to go through the refs for the first half of the list since some, like Guerillero pointed out, are not reliable. Aza24 (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I replaced the source in question with a CIA World Factbook reference (theoretically, you could source most of the list from the CIA Factbook, there's even a page for national anthems, but I don't know if that is acceptable for FA standards). I will look at what other sources need to be replaced or updated. MSG17 (talk) 13:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

• Everything looks good except for the references, as Guerillero pointed out. ~ HAL333 04:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @Guerillero: Are you still on the side of delisting the article? Several of the references appear to have been replaced since your last comment, but I don't want to speak for you. We are getting late in the process and need to make a decision soon. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
• Keep per the fabulous work done by both Walter Görlitz and Aza24 to improve the article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:36, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
• Keep I am satisified with the improvements made. ~ HAL333 21:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
• Keep seems satisfactory to me after many improvements. While there's still some ref formatting that could use work (which I don't have the patience to continue fixing, unfortunately), I would think that is hardly a good reason to delist. Aza24 (talk) 05:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

While not all of the earlier commenters on this ancient nomination have returned to see the more recent changes, at this point it has shifted to at least a "no consensus" result. As such, I'm going to close this as a keep (no consensus to delist). --PresN 20:42, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

Delist

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC) [2].

---

List of presidents of Portugal

Notified: RickMorais, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Portugal

I am nominating this for featured list removal because I believe its doesn't fit the criteria anymore. There's basically no source, and no improvement after over two weeks notification on talk page. Jarodalien (talk) 02:39, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Maybe give it a few more weeks? The page has seen some changes since you put it up for removal and I think I can improve on it. But I'm not sure at the moment if it can be improved to the point that all of it is covered by references, so I'm not against removing the feature and then adding it later on. CriMen1 (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Just go ahead make improvement that you can, and I don't think we should really care if the feature status removed or not because we could always promoted again when it fits.--Jarodalien (talk) 10:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

I don't see much evidence of the promised improvements, so, unfortunately, I'll vote to Delist this FL. ~ HAL333([3]) 01:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Delist per above.--Jarodalien (talk) 14:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Delist per above. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 17:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC) [4].

---

List of extant papal tombs

Notified: Gerbis, WikiProject Catholicism

I am nominating this for featured list removal because of the issues indicated in the templates added on 5 March 2020 (the reasons for Gerbis adding the templates may be found in Talk:List of extant papal tombs#One source). The article may fail to meet Wikipedia:Featured list criteria 3a, considering that the content may be outdated. Σανμοσα^{The Trve Lawe of free Monarchies} 03:27, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

• Delist per nom. ~ HAL333([5]) 01:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
• Delist per nom. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:08, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.