Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Failed log/October 2020

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was withdrawn by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC) [1].

---

Hurricanes in Costa Rica

Nominator(s): SMB99thx my edits 08:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

After Hurricanehink said that articles like this isn't a GA material, but more like FL-material and with Destroyeraa suggesting I have to go for it, I'm here to nominate this list to make this list article a featured list. My intention to get this article into a featured list is to set an example for I like hurricanes want this to be (for weeks now, they have been working only on List of Hispaniola hurricanes!). While this is an unusual reason, I do believe this article should be a featured list. Most of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones Featured lists are pretty oriented on United States. This should be the breath of a fresh air, and I would be glad to see that. Any comments could be helpful. SMB99thx my edits 08:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Oppose

• Could you add anything about the climatology of storms affecting Costa Rica? Is there any weather center there?

• Yes, Instituto Meteorológico Nacional. Will try.

• Done

• Make sure everything is either in present or past tense (I recommend the latter).

• Well. Done.

• Not done. (1908) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Fixed some.

• Be consistent whether you inflate damage totals to 2020 USD or not (I recommend not, the WPTC doesn't usually). Also, be consistent whether you do US$ or USD. You use the Costa Rican currency for Otto but no other storms, so consistency would be appreciated.

• I choose in year USD and removed the inflations. I'm not sure about adding CRC to all every other storms (as I need 1900s CRC to do this), instead I made the CRC into footnotes. Done

• "Therefore, Nineteen remains the only tropical storm recorded to make landfall in Costa Rica." - source?

• Removed. Appears to be WP:OR.

• Was there any updated status on the 29 missing people from Cesar? That source (a dead link) is from 1996, so maybe there's some more updated info.

• No, I believe.

• I did some research and found some other death tolls, so would you mind double checking in Spanish? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• "The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Panama alerted officials in Nicaragua, Honduras, Costa Rica, El Salvador and Guatemala about the possible impacts from Beta." - this seems unneeded, both because it mentions other countries, and because it mentions possible impacts. The article should be about actual impacts.

• Removed

• There's no need to mention that a storm caused no fatalities. That's implied if you don't mention it.

• Removed

• The flooding was the worst to hit the country in recent years, leading to the "biggest crisis in Costa Rican history" according to President Luis Guillermo Solís.[citation needed] - please add source

• Yes. Done. (the original source is dead, so I used the Weather Underground source instead)

• "Flooding from Hurricane Patricia damaged 10 homes in Jacó." - could you provide some more context for this? Like, mentioning where the storm was in relation to the country.

• Done. Precursor disturbance of Hurricane Patricia in Central America

• That's a bit grammatically awkward. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• " Hurricane Irene caused damages of $1 million (USD) to banana crops in Costa Rica.[7]" - ditto, more context would be helpful

• I assume that my grammatical errors are the cause of this. By the way, Irene caused $1 million 1971 USD in damages to the banana crops in Costa Rica. Done.

• No, more like, where did Irene go? How did it cause $1M in damage? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• heavy rain from the indirect effects of Marco affected parts of the country for three days - awkward grammar

• Fixed. Heavy rains from Marco

• "Material damage from Nate across Costa Rica is estimated at ₡106 billion (US$185 million).[52] Total damages caused by the hurricane in Costa Rica are estimated at ₡322.1 billion (US$562 million),[35] making it the costliest natural disaster in Costa Rican history." - what's the difference between material damage and total damages?

• Material damages generally involve infrastructure damage, IIRC. Total damages include agricultural damages. Fixed

• Considering how long Nate's section is, could you just list total damage? That's what you do for other storms. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• "Infrared satellite imagery showing Nate bringing heavy rain in masse to Nicaragua and Costa Rica" - this is the caption of Nate's image. The "in masse" is weird

• Fixed.

• I don't know what the "en masse" means though, it's awkwardly written. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Are you quite sure you've gotten every known storm to affect the country? Just a day ago, I mentioned six storms that were missing, and that was only with a brief search of mine.

• I'm pretty sure that I get every known storm to affect the country, including Tropical Depression Twelve-E (2011). I tried to add Hurricane Felix, but there is no mention about impacts of Hurricane Felix in Costa Rica. What I can find is [2], which mentions only possible impacts.

• Watch out for overlinking.

• Whoa! My goodness! I'll clamped it down. Done

• Check again, there are still a lot of redundant links. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• "The 1906 Florida Keys hurricane forms near Costa Rica" - this is an unofficial name, so I wouldn't call it the "1906 Florida keys hurricane" here.

• Done.

• Don't call it "hurricane eight" either though, since that's not a name, it's just the designation in HURDAT. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• While I get that Nate was CR's costliest storm, it seems to be a bit lengthy compared to the other storms. How did you decide how much content is included for each storm?

• I didn't decide it (I decided only for these six storms), but I'm responsible for nominating this into FL. Hurricane Nate is the worst storm on Costa Rica, which is why it's more lengthy.

• It seems like you just copied the section from the storm article. It's 15 lines long, twice as long as Gert's section (even though Nate did 181 times the amount of damage). So I'll ask again, how did you decide how much info to include for each storm? Did you include all known info? Or just a summary of each storm? Most FL's for storm effects by location are just a summary of the storm's impacts. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• The Climatology section doesn't have the right numbers.

• Updated.

The article is in pretty good shape, but I don't think it's ready for FLC yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

This is why I hesitated to nominate this for FL. I want to make this article GA, but unfortunately it should be a FL. SMB99thx my edits 01:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Also, where in Otto's TCR does it back up the bit about the 1887 storm? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

None, so I removed it. SMB99thx my edits 01:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink: I think I fixed some but not all. What do you think? Thanks. SMB99thx my edits 10:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Few more comments, and some concerns about comprehensiveness.

• Hurricanes are uncommon in the country, as only a dozen have been recorded in history. - there's 18
• How come you have notes of the Costa Rican currency for only storms going back to 1998?
• Could you get a link for ref 23? This provides the same info, sans the missing people.
• This site lists over 100 storms that indirectly affected the country. I'm not sure if they're all worth adding, the site doesn't say anything about their impacts (just that they passed within a certain distance). The site is in Spanish, so there might be some climatology stuff worth adding.
• This site says 85 storms affected Costa Rica.
• More information (in Spanish)
• More info
• More info about the 1887 storm
• I suggest creating a "Background" or "Climatology" section so you don't have to have references in the lead. You could talk about Costa Rica, its location/population, how often it's hit/affected, why it's so uncommonly affected, that kinda stuff.

I'm not sure how you want to handle the potentially hundred missing storms. I don't mean to be picky - you've done a good job so far with the article. It just falls short of what a featured list should be IMO. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• I think this is beyond my capability (again, content creation is not my strength). If there is a "good list" category, I might could pull this off. Withdrawing my nomination for now, I think this is little bit too premature (as said by Destroyeraa). Thank you, Hurricanehink. I'll try to fix some time to time, but it might need to take months. (see Talk:List of Bermuda hurricanes) SMB99thx my edits 00:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. It's a good start! There used to be a good list category, but not anymore. These lists by location require a lot of work to make sure they're comprehensive. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

@SMB99thx: You are NOT allowed to close this. You are not a coordinator. Please don't do that again. @Giants2008, PresN, and The Rambling Man: He has withdrawn and closed it himself. Is everything that needed to be done, done? Noah^Talk 10:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 15 October 2020 (UTC) [3].

---

List of Chennaiyin FC players

Nominator(s): SHISHIR DUA 07:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because it possess decent sources and is pretty relevant to the FL criterion. SHISHIR DUA 07:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Oppose by Lee Vilenski

Side note - as always, claiming points for the cup here. There's a lot wrong with this, and made me think carefully about a straight oppose from beginning. The prose is terrible, filled with grammatical issues and not really explaining what is going on. What is a "marquee player", for example. Why do we have an article for a club that only existed for 6 years? Is there any articles that actually comment on the squad? Elano has two of the same image in the squad. Also:

• The note is broken
• Tooltips needed on references column.
• flagcruft issues

+Saving WIP. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 07:59, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• No alttext
• Where is the goals and appearances cited?
• Jargon terms like "golden boot" are described without explanation
• Acronyms such as the IPL are used without denoting. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

• @FLC director and delegates: I'm not sure exactly what the policy for this is but with the comments from Lee above and the fact that the nominator has been indefinitely banned, I'm assuming this nominations should be removed...? Aza24 (talk) 00:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

• Oppose from me - Lead is only five sentences and features such awful English as "defeated FC Goa by 2-1 due well anticipated the goals of Balwant Singh and Elano". But most importantly, as far as I can see none of the stats are sourced (there's a ref on each row but it only supports the fact that the player played for the club, not their actual stats). Clearly the article is not ready for FLC so I suggest it be speedily closed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

• Comments: I agree with Aza24, that it should be immediately removed. The user has been banned for CIR, so Lee Vilenski, I don't think you could have expect anything better. These bunch of articles or the players' list of Indian Super League clubs, which are 5-6 years old, was never been disucussed at all in the Indian footy project or any other discussions related to ISL. As a main contributor in Indian footy project I will bring the subject for discussion at the project. For now I think the nomination should be removed. Drat8sub (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Snow closing. --PresN 16:14, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was withdrawn by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC) [4].

---

Hurricanes in Costa Rica

Nominator(s): SMB99thx my edits 08:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

After Hurricanehink said that articles like this isn't a GA material, but more like FL-material and with Destroyeraa suggesting I have to go for it, I'm here to nominate this list to make this list article a featured list. My intention to get this article into a featured list is to set an example for I like hurricanes want this to be (for weeks now, they have been working only on List of Hispaniola hurricanes!). While this is an unusual reason, I do believe this article should be a featured list. Most of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones Featured lists are pretty oriented on United States. This should be the breath of a fresh air, and I would be glad to see that. Any comments could be helpful. SMB99thx my edits 08:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Oppose

• Could you add anything about the climatology of storms affecting Costa Rica? Is there any weather center there?

• Yes, Instituto Meteorológico Nacional. Will try.

• Done

• Make sure everything is either in present or past tense (I recommend the latter).

• Well. Done.

• Not done. (1908) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Fixed some.

• Be consistent whether you inflate damage totals to 2020 USD or not (I recommend not, the WPTC doesn't usually). Also, be consistent whether you do US$ or USD. You use the Costa Rican currency for Otto but no other storms, so consistency would be appreciated.

• I choose in year USD and removed the inflations. I'm not sure about adding CRC to all every other storms (as I need 1900s CRC to do this), instead I made the CRC into footnotes. Done

• "Therefore, Nineteen remains the only tropical storm recorded to make landfall in Costa Rica." - source?

• Removed. Appears to be WP:OR.

• Was there any updated status on the 29 missing people from Cesar? That source (a dead link) is from 1996, so maybe there's some more updated info.

• No, I believe.

• I did some research and found some other death tolls, so would you mind double checking in Spanish? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• "The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in Panama alerted officials in Nicaragua, Honduras, Costa Rica, El Salvador and Guatemala about the possible impacts from Beta." - this seems unneeded, both because it mentions other countries, and because it mentions possible impacts. The article should be about actual impacts.

• Removed

• There's no need to mention that a storm caused no fatalities. That's implied if you don't mention it.

• Removed

• The flooding was the worst to hit the country in recent years, leading to the "biggest crisis in Costa Rican history" according to President Luis Guillermo Solís.[citation needed] - please add source

• Yes. Done. (the original source is dead, so I used the Weather Underground source instead)

• "Flooding from Hurricane Patricia damaged 10 homes in Jacó." - could you provide some more context for this? Like, mentioning where the storm was in relation to the country.

• Done. Precursor disturbance of Hurricane Patricia in Central America

• That's a bit grammatically awkward. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• " Hurricane Irene caused damages of $1 million (USD) to banana crops in Costa Rica.[7]" - ditto, more context would be helpful

• I assume that my grammatical errors are the cause of this. By the way, Irene caused $1 million 1971 USD in damages to the banana crops in Costa Rica. Done.

• No, more like, where did Irene go? How did it cause $1M in damage? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• heavy rain from the indirect effects of Marco affected parts of the country for three days - awkward grammar

• Fixed. Heavy rains from Marco

• "Material damage from Nate across Costa Rica is estimated at ₡106 billion (US$185 million).[52] Total damages caused by the hurricane in Costa Rica are estimated at ₡322.1 billion (US$562 million),[35] making it the costliest natural disaster in Costa Rican history." - what's the difference between material damage and total damages?

• Material damages generally involve infrastructure damage, IIRC. Total damages include agricultural damages. Fixed

• Considering how long Nate's section is, could you just list total damage? That's what you do for other storms. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• "Infrared satellite imagery showing Nate bringing heavy rain in masse to Nicaragua and Costa Rica" - this is the caption of Nate's image. The "in masse" is weird

• Fixed.

• I don't know what the "en masse" means though, it's awkwardly written. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Are you quite sure you've gotten every known storm to affect the country? Just a day ago, I mentioned six storms that were missing, and that was only with a brief search of mine.

• I'm pretty sure that I get every known storm to affect the country, including Tropical Depression Twelve-E (2011). I tried to add Hurricane Felix, but there is no mention about impacts of Hurricane Felix in Costa Rica. What I can find is [5], which mentions only possible impacts.

• Watch out for overlinking.

• Whoa! My goodness! I'll clamped it down. Done

• Check again, there are still a lot of redundant links. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• "The 1906 Florida Keys hurricane forms near Costa Rica" - this is an unofficial name, so I wouldn't call it the "1906 Florida keys hurricane" here.

• Done.

• Don't call it "hurricane eight" either though, since that's not a name, it's just the designation in HURDAT. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• While I get that Nate was CR's costliest storm, it seems to be a bit lengthy compared to the other storms. How did you decide how much content is included for each storm?

• I didn't decide it (I decided only for these six storms), but I'm responsible for nominating this into FL. Hurricane Nate is the worst storm on Costa Rica, which is why it's more lengthy.

• It seems like you just copied the section from the storm article. It's 15 lines long, twice as long as Gert's section (even though Nate did 181 times the amount of damage). So I'll ask again, how did you decide how much info to include for each storm? Did you include all known info? Or just a summary of each storm? Most FL's for storm effects by location are just a summary of the storm's impacts. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• The Climatology section doesn't have the right numbers.

• Updated.

The article is in pretty good shape, but I don't think it's ready for FLC yet. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:34, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

This is why I hesitated to nominate this for FL. I want to make this article GA, but unfortunately it should be a FL. SMB99thx my edits 01:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Also, where in Otto's TCR does it back up the bit about the 1887 storm? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

None, so I removed it. SMB99thx my edits 01:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

@Hurricanehink: I think I fixed some but not all. What do you think? Thanks. SMB99thx my edits 10:58, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Few more comments, and some concerns about comprehensiveness.

• Hurricanes are uncommon in the country, as only a dozen have been recorded in history. - there's 18
• How come you have notes of the Costa Rican currency for only storms going back to 1998?
• Could you get a link for ref 23? This provides the same info, sans the missing people.
• This site lists over 100 storms that indirectly affected the country. I'm not sure if they're all worth adding, the site doesn't say anything about their impacts (just that they passed within a certain distance). The site is in Spanish, so there might be some climatology stuff worth adding.
• This site says 85 storms affected Costa Rica.
• More information (in Spanish)
• More info
• More info about the 1887 storm
• I suggest creating a "Background" or "Climatology" section so you don't have to have references in the lead. You could talk about Costa Rica, its location/population, how often it's hit/affected, why it's so uncommonly affected, that kinda stuff.

I'm not sure how you want to handle the potentially hundred missing storms. I don't mean to be picky - you've done a good job so far with the article. It just falls short of what a featured list should be IMO. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• I think this is beyond my capability (again, content creation is not my strength). If there is a "good list" category, I might could pull this off. Withdrawing my nomination for now, I think this is little bit too premature (as said by Destroyeraa). Thank you, Hurricanehink. I'll try to fix some time to time, but it might need to take months. (see Talk:List of Bermuda hurricanes) SMB99thx my edits 00:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. It's a good start! There used to be a good list category, but not anymore. These lists by location require a lot of work to make sure they're comprehensive. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

@SMB99thx: You are NOT allowed to close this. You are not a coordinator. Please don't do that again. @Giants2008, PresN, and The Rambling Man: He has withdrawn and closed it himself. Is everything that needed to be done, done? Noah^Talk 10:22, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 5 October 2020 (UTC) [6].

---

Chaubisi Rajya

Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Chaubisi Rajya were sovereign and intermittently allied petty kingdoms on the Indian subcontinent, ruled by Khas from medieval India ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• Drive-by comment - what does the number column mean/signify? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:42, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• ​ Nothing really except for counting the 24 principalities. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

• I would remove it. It makes it look like they were officially numbered in some way -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:40, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

• ​Removed. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Further comments

• Why is the article title in italics?
• "that Khas people ruled" => "that the Khas people ruled"
• "then he proceeded to the unification process of present day country of Nepal" => "he subsequently began the unification process of the present day country of Nepal"
• "Palpa was one of the biggest kingdoms and powerful" => "Palpa was one of the biggest and most powerful kingdoms"
• "they were able to create independent kingdoms" - who's "they"?
• "then he went to win a battle against Belkot" => "then went on to win a battle against Belkot"
• "these kingdoms played a pivotal role" - in what?
• "The unified Kingdom of Nepal continued to be ruled by Shah dynasty; with Rana dynasty de facto ruling the country" => "The unified Kingdom of Nepal continued to be ruled by the Shah dynasty, with the Rana dynasty de facto ruling the country"
• "and transited to the Federal Democratic Republic" => "and transitioned to the Federal Democratic Republic"
• Is there a more interesting heading than just "list"?
• "Map of current day provinces" => "Map of present day provinces"
• Refs should be centred
• Are there any additional pieces of data about the kingdoms that could be added to the table? It just seems a bit "thin" with just two columns......
• Regards -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:50, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

• ChrisTheDude, I believe I have addressed your comments except for expanding the list because there isn't anything available to add into the list. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

• ​Now it shows maps.~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:06, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Some random comments first:

• That RFC that passed a couple weeks ago requires a table name on the table regardless of context I believe
• With that said perhaps rather than one long column for the tables refs, that might look better next to the name (like here) or with a "sources: ... " like at the bottom of the table at List of presidents of the United States
• Source comments:
• Page number/s for ref 2? and 3, 5, 8 13 and 14 as well
• isbn for ref 3? (see here – I believe this is the correct publication)
• Reliability seems fine Aza24 (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

• Aza24, All done. Thanks for the comments. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:32, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

• Can we get page numbers for refs 1 and 3...? having 200 and 450 page documents without a page number to confirm the information kind of defeats the point of a reference :) Aza24 (talk) 23:21, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

• Aza24, Done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• Awesome, pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 04:23, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~ HAL333 19:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments by HAL333 Could you link to Petty kingdom in the lede? I didn't know what that was and had to look it up. You could also crop the lede image. I'm not sure if the white border is needed. Even if it was in English, I couldn't read the text at that size. Could you add some context to the caption as well. Something like Prithvi Narayan Shah, the last ruler of the Gorkha Kingdom. Everything else looks great. ~ HAL333 21:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC) HAL333, All done. Thanks for the comments. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 14:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~ HAL333 19:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Thoughts

• I would remove the maps because they don't really tell you where the kingdoms were
• Not sortable
• The sources column isn't really MOS compliant

--Guerillero | Parlez Moi 04:36, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

• • @Guerillero and CAPTAIN MEDUSA:: I made an edit that ... I hope ... deals with your second and third points, Guerillero. (Feel free to revert if I misunderstood.) That's all I've got for now. - Dank (push to talk) 19:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Guerillero, Done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

• Support --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 15:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

• Not knowing the standards at FLCR, I had left my concerns at the article talk page but it seems to have escaped notice, so here it is. I have one other question: Do the sources cited support the matching of these old kingdoms with the modern day provinces of Nepal? Best, Usedtobecool ☎️ 02:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
• @FLC director and delegates: I wish to withdraw this nomination. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.