Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/March 2024
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
- Notified: Jwalte04, WP:NFL, Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/Washington Commanders subproject, WP:USA & WP:WPLIST
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails a number of criteria:
- 1. Prose: the prose is choppy (the opening sentence is self-referencing), the first paragraph especially could use a good rewrite
- 2. Lead: there are also a ton of duplicate links in the lead. Some clarifications are needed (was their worst record based on total losses or winning percentage?)
- 3b. Comprehensiveness: primary issue here, the list lacks necessary inline citations in the lead and within the table (the awards especially). Sources lack consistent formatting (dates especially) and there is too much of a reliance on "general references". Some sources appear to either be dead, out of date or unreliable.
- 4. Structure: the notes and inline cites need to be split into separate sections.
- Accessibility: the list lacks all accessibility features expected of WP:FL today, both in the table, the key and no alt text on the photo.
The list was nominated over 15 years ago when standards were quite different. These issues either need to be addressed or the article delisted. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi everyone! I am currently working on it. Hopefully, I can fix the issues mentioned above. Jwalte04 (talk) 15:22, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello again! I have made a bunch of improvements to the article. Hopefully I did all that was required. But please let me know if you have any other suggestions to make this article better! Jwalte04 (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Jwalte04, amazing job. This looks so much better. I have some specific comments below:
- Super Bowl XXVI is linked twice in the lead
- Recommend that the hasktag symbol (#) be superscript (#) to avoid things like
NFC#
where it doesn't look like a symbol and looks like part of the acronym. - Unless it is a purely explanatory note (as an example
Does not include postseason victories
would be a purely explanatory note), it should have an inline citation. - There are sentences in the lead that don't have an inline citation. Each sentence(s)/paragraph should end with an inline citation.
- The totals in the last row of the table don't line up with their respective columns.
- Thanks for taking this on, you've done a great job! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, I think we are all set! Jwalte04 (talk) 21:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Jwalte04, I have no more comments. Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, I think we are all set! Jwalte04 (talk) 21:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Jwalte04, amazing job. This looks so much better. I have some specific comments below:
- Hello again! I have made a bunch of improvements to the article. Hopefully I did all that was required. But please let me know if you have any other suggestions to make this article better! Jwalte04 (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's issues addressed and no votes to remove; closing as kept. --PresN 14:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was kept by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC) [2].[reply]
- Notified: Marylandstater, Y2hyaXM, WikiProject Maryland
2007 FL which, unfortunately, has not stood the test of time. Concerns on the talk page have been met with silence. Firstly, the last paragraph of the lead is unsourced. The list is also tagged {{no footnotes}} and, indeed, uses general references. Overall, this shouldn't be very hard to rectify, but as it stands, this fails 3b and is not exemplar. (I'm also concerned about the very-near-total reliance on a single source, but that isn't any criterion I know of and it's perfectly reliable.) QueenofHearts 09:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remove: per nom. Please ping me if changes are made. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:43, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]- @Idiosincrático: I've improved the list and it isn't a slam-dunk removal candidate now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've withdrawn my vote, but haven't conducted a review. Idiosincrático (talk) 13:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Idiosincrático: I've improved the list and it isn't a slam-dunk removal candidate now. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:34, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's issues addressed and no votes to remove; closing as kept. --PresN 14:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [3].[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list removal because it is not comprehensive, its prose are weak and it is not kept up to date. It was promoted in 2014 and I feel no longer warrants featured list status. Lankyant (talk) 01:38, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove: per nom. Please ping me if changes are made. Idiosincrático (talk) 06:41, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- At first glance, this isn't too bad compared to other FLRCs. Definitely needs to add the last few years, but I think it is otherwise fairly comprehensive, unless there are other details to this award that I am missing. (Which may be the case given that two of the three "current" holders aren't listed in the article?) Also, the article should probably move to Golden Martín Fierro Award, but I would suggest doing that after the FLRC closes. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I guess I answered my own question, because I found this article that discusses radio and digital winners (assuming my basic high school Spanish and my browser's auto-translation are accurate). In that case, a delist may be more reasonable given the amount of content to be added. RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination has been open for 2 months; I also went looking and yeah, it seems that at some point it was split into TV and Radio? ([4]) The list just has not been kept up to date; the last person to seriously attempt it was Lankyant (the nominator) in 2022, at which point it was already 5 years out of date. So, closing, delisted. --PresN 13:54, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.