Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/November 2020

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC) [1].

---

Ryan Reynolds filmography

Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Ryan Reynolds is a Canadian actor known for his work in television shows such as Two Guys and a Girl, romantic comedies such as The Proposal and his title role in the Deadpool film franchise. As always I welcome all constructive comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 13:06, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

;Comments Any reason why Blade Trinity don't have the year in brackets like the rest do? "Reynolds appeared in lead roles in the commercially successful romantic comedies; Just Friends....." - no reason for that semi-colon there "The following year, Reynolds starred in the title role of the superhero film Green Lantern (2011)" - in this case, the year is redundant because of the first three words, so you can dispense with this one "Two years later, he appeared in the drama Mississippi Grind (2015)" - same here "It became the highest grossing R-Rated film" - no need for the capital on rated I would say that 6 Underground should sort under S for Six "Year" of TBA sorts at the top, it should really sort at the bottom Note e needs to be re-worded when used against TV shows, because they aren't films Think that's it from me- great work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for your comments. Hopefully sorted now. Cowlibob (talk) 10:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~ HAL333([2]) 11:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments Should the dash be centered for his role in Murder in Manhattan? Spotless — really admirable work. ~ HAL333 04:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC) @HAL333: Fixed above. Thanks for your comments. Cowlibob (talk) 11:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~ HAL333([3]) 11:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support this nom. Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
• Support this nom as it passes all the criteria for Featured-Article status. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:44, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Doing now Aza24 (talk) 09:22, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

• ref 78 isn't in a citation template like the others so is missing work, author, date and retrieval date; you may want to archive it as well
• ref 63 missing author
• Publishers/works are linked in the first mentions, which is fine
• Inclusion of works/authors/titles looks good otherwise
• The only reliability issue I spotted was a youtube link, but it seems to be in addition to another ref so no issue there imo
• I'll pass when the first and second points are addressed. Aza24 (talk)

@Aza24: Thanks for the source review. I've fixed the above. Needed to update a few entries. The YouTube link is from the official SNL channel so should be ok. Cowlibob (talk) 12:57, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Yeah looks good. Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 23:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2020 (UTC) [4].

---

List of amphibians of Texas

Nominator(s): HAL333 20:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Branching out a little bit, here is my first attempt at a biological list. The most interesting part of this list is probably the salamanders that are only found in Texas Hill Country, and sometimes only in specific cave systems. ~ HAL333([5]) 20:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Comment

• "Once found througout" - typo
• "Rhinophrynus is a burrowing ant and termite eater, hence the common name "burrowing frogs"" - I would say "burrowing frog" singular, as it covers only one species
• "These large salamanders are often mistaken as eels" - can I check that this is US English? Over here we would say mistaken for something, but maybe this is valid US usage
• "hence the colloquial name "Conger Eels"" - don't think the C and E should be lower case
• "Salamandrids typically have patterns of bright and contrasting colours" - presume this article is intended to be written in US English, so the last word should not have a U
• Rio Grande lesser siren has no status, just an orange cell?

Texas lists it as an endangered species within the state, but it's a subspecies, and a contested one at that. And the IUCN doesn't give it a rating. ~ HAL333([6]) 20:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Think that's it from me, great work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done ~ HAL333([7]) 20:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Medusa

• Order Anura links to a disambiguation page
• the monotypic Rhinophrynus → italic Rhinophrynus?
• fore limbs → forelimbs
• Images have no alt text

• Note that I am not an expert on this topic. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• CAPTAIN MEDUSA Hopefully, I have addressed your concerns. ~ HAL333([8]) 17:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:24, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from PresN

Ah, heard so much talk and complaining about the Barton Springs salamander (and other members of Eurycea) growing up in Austin, nice to see it.

• Bolding in the first sentence is unnecessary; doubly so since it's not even the actual title of the article.
• I find calling out specific species in the lead by their scientific name but not their common name reads oddly.
• "Eleven amphibian species have been designated as threatened within the state" - by who? Also, citations should go after punctuation marks at least, if not always to the end of the sentence, not just stuck after clauses
• The red/orange highlighting on cells violates WP:ACCESS- if you're colorblind or are using a screen reader, that information isn't present. You'll need to find some text-based way of indicating that information, either instead of or in addition to the colors.
• Speaking of WP:ACCESS, the white text on light blue for families is hard to read as a fully-sighted reader; I can't imagine it's easy with poor vision.
• You have some inconsistencies in capitalization for common names, e.g. "Greenhouse frog" instead of "greenhouse frog". That said, it looks strange to have the mixed capitals to start with with place names vs non; you may consider just always capitalizing the first letter since it's a standalone name
• For almost the entire list each row is a species, but for Siren intermedia you do subspecies; presumably because Texas calls out one subspecies as threatened. You should be consistent, and if there's an issue like that add have a note, not change the structure of the article. That would clear up the empty status cell, which should be an NE (not evaluated) otherwise

Okay - that was one of the things that I was confused about. I wasn't sure if I could list it as NE since the IUCN doesn't have a page on it. ~ HAL333([9]) 05:28, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

• Consider widening the common name column a hair at the expense of the status or distribution columns so that it doesn't wrap to two+ lines so much
• You link the common name of each species to the scientific name, which redirects to the common name- it's on purpose, but I don't know why.

I was replicating what the FL List of amphibians of Bulgaria did. I was halfway through when it occurred to me that it was redundant. ~ HAL333([10]) 05:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

• Note A is awkwardly formatted; you should either have each status on its own line or drop the colored blocks and just list the statuses out in prose

I'm sorry - I don't catch your drift. What would "each status on its own line" look like... ~ HAL333([11]) 07:13, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

I just had an idea. Would moving the content from note a to the top, like the table with Texas statuses, work? ~ HAL333([12]) 02:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

PresN Sorry for the ping, but do you know how I could resolve this? ~ HAL333([13]) 00:17, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

It's resolved, see my edit on October 19. --PresN 17:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

• You have a section named "Notes and references" subdivided into Notes and... Citations. It should be References- the citation is the in-line bit, the reference is the full work description in this section.

YI corrected that, but would that be acceptable in a biographical article where the citations section refers to a "Works cited" section below? ~ HAL333([14]) 23:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

• It's apparently AmphibiaWeb, not Amphibiaweb
• "Texas parks & Wildlife Department" - parks
• Be consistent in linking publishers in refs- IUCN gets linked, so the rest should too-United States Geological Survey, etc.
• IUCN refs all need dois- they're listed on each IUCN page at the top (e.g. "|doi=10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T41630A45210528.en")
• It's standard in journal cites to use first initial instead of first name- you do so usually, but some of the IUCN cites you're using full name

That was another thing that I was confused about. Sometimes the IUCN gave the full name but other times it just gave the intial. ~ HAL333([15]) 16:44, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

• Ref 173 (Animal Diversity Web) is missing the author
• Super-minor: {{cite iucn}} is a helper template for {{cite journal}}; as a result, you don't need to add archive-urls to it because you're citing a "journal" that has a website archive, rather than citing a transient website. It's a minor difference, and I wouldn't take the time to change it, but for future lists just know you don't need to add the archive.
• Also minor: if you have an archive for a live page, add |url-status=live to the cite so that the live page is the first link, instead of the very slow archive link.

--PresN 03:11, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

 Done Hopefully, I have addressed most of your concerns. I'm a little confused on the the recommendation about changing the statuses. I'm also having some trouble with the coding in ref 129. ~ HAL333([16]) 23:32, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• FLC criteria:
• 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the tables seems fine. Some sentences need periods, such as "Although there are several poulations throughout the southeast US, this species is only known in Texas from a single specimen collect in Nacogdoches County in 1940"; there are judgment calls to make here, because you're trying to avoid periods when possible, but sometimes avoiding them won't work.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review).
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
• 6. It is stable.
• Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 14:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Source review –

• The references are all to high-quality reliable sources.
• One formatting nit-pick I have is that the title of ref 7 should have an en dash instead of the present hyphen for style purposes. That's the only issue I was able to find with the formatting.
• The link-checker tool (and my manual check) shows that the Herps of Texas EL is dead. You should either find an updated link, add an archived version of the link or just remove it. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:21, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

 Done ~ HAL333 19:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Both of my sourcing issues have been addressed, so I'd say this source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:12, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC) [17].

---

List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1947

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry folks, here is yet another in the never-ending country number ones project. So far 56 of these have been promoted to FL, so here's the next one, covering a year in which one of the most successful songs was about smoking cigarettes - not sure that would happen nowadays....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~ HAL333([18]) 21:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments Why isn't "chapter" capitalized? The caption for the final image needs a source. Everything else looks great. ~ HAL333([19]) 21:41, 26 October 2020 (UTC) Fixed. Don't know why that column was headed "chapter", must have been a C+P error when I was re-formatting the refs -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~ HAL333([20]) 21:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support! Support! Support! (apologies to Mr. Williams) – All looks good. —Ojorojo (talk) 16:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support - the things I would suggest would be using {{abbr|Ref.|References}} for the table's reference heading and adding archive links to the online sources, but aside from those nitpicks everything looks good.--Alexandra^IDV 16:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from TRM

• "songs in the United States, based on the number of times a song" songs/song repetitive.
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• " in jukeboxes; " for my benefit, where were these jukeboxes? How many were there? The List of Billboard number-one country songs article isn't very helpful in that sense. Indeed, shouldn't that article be linked here somewhere in the lead?
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• Yes, mildly confused now as this list says "The Juke Box Folk chart is considered part of the lineage of the current Hot Country Songs chart" but I though the link above was more relevant.
  • Apologies, I may be being very thick but I don't understand. What "link above" do you refer to? And could you clarify how the sentence is confusing? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
    • I get it now - fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• " in the top spot." repetitive as you started the sentence with "The number-one position ..."
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• " in the top spot since the issue of Billboard dated October 26, 1946," how many weeks was that?
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• I think the chronology for Travis is mildly confusing, you could (and should) add that Tubb broke the Divorce Me C.O.D. run and went back to number one between Travis' hits.
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• "He would have two " tres americain. "He had two"?
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• And then you go into "would" overdrive!
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• " country number one singles" should that "number-one" be hyphenated?
  • Fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
• Bob Willis (not the cricketer) was "widely known as the "King of Western Swing",[11]" but I looked at source 11 and could see that phrase at all. Our article also calls it "Western swing" rather than "Western Swing".
  • Different source found. Also note it's Bob Wills, not Willis :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

That's all I have for a quick western swing by. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 21:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

• @The Rambling Man: - all done bar one where I could do with some clarification....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

  Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 10:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Source review – The reliability of the sources looks fine throughout and the link-checker tool shows no problems. Just a few random formatting issues to fix:

• The page range in ref 4 looks funky. You have two of the same number in there.
• Refs 3 and 4 should probably have the longer 13-digit ISBNs, for consistency and per MoS guidelines.
• Ref 2 could use an en dash in the title for the year range. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

@Giants2008: - all done -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

All of the changes look good. The source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:05, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC) [21].

---

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1948

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Here is the latest in the seemingly never-ending series of number one country songs FLCs, 56 of which have already been promoted and another looks to be on its way. All I can really say about this one is that it was definitely Eddy Arnold's year....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• Florida Georgia Line spent a 22nd week → Florida Georgia Line spent the 22nd week
  • I do not believe that that would be correct English, I believe it is correct as it stands..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
• Between them the five songs → Between them, the five songs
• Add {{Use mdy dates|date=November 2020}} at the top.

• That's it from me. Great work! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 12:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Two done, see my response to the other -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

• Support — ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

• Reliabillity looks fine
• Ref 8 has a double page number
• refs 8 and 4 should be ISBN 13s like the others (use [https://www.isbn.org/ISBN_converter the converter)
• formatting is great otherwise Aza24 (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

@Aza24: - fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Great, pass for source review Aza24 (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

• Support Looks good to me. ~ HAL333 22:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Dank

• Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• I added {{sronly|Chart history}} as a table caption.
• FLC criteria:
• 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting with some comments in the edit summaries; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the table seems fine.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
• 6. It is stable.
• Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC) [22].

---

Louis Schwitzer Award

Nominator(s): MWright96 (talk) 21:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

The Louis Schwitzer Award is presented by the Indiana Section of SAE International to recognize innovative concepts used in racing cars entered for the Indianapolis 500. It is named after the inventor Louis H. Schwitzer and the winners of the award have their names added to a trophy on permanent display in the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum. I believe this list meets the criteria to be at a featured level and look forward to all comments and concerns. Should the list pass this review, it would be the first FL for American open-wheel racing. MWright96 (talk) 21:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

• Support – Another great list. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 18:00, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Comment

• "Accolade sponsor BorgWarner and the Indiana Section of SAE International provides" => "Accolade sponsor BorgWarner and the Indiana Section of SAE International provide" (the subject is plural)
• "The award has been shared just once in its history: in 1977" - I think you need to re-word this. I know what you mean, but in 2002, for example, it was technically shared by six individuals
• "Firestone tire engineer Cara Adams became the first women recipient" - "women recipient" isn't correct. She isn't a "women". I think "female recipient" would work better.
• In the infobox there's an amusing typo in "Reward(s): Plague"
• Think that's it from me...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:07, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Have made edits based on the comments made above. MWright96 (talk) 18:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:45, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Dank

• Standard disclaimer: still don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
• A {{short description}} would be helpful ... something simple like "engineering award for racing vehicle improvements" would work.
• Personally, I have no problem at all with the sort order in the "Concept" column; I think sorting in columns like this one is mainly used to group similar items. But some reviewers prefer to sort "Beadall" under B (instead of sorting by quote marks) and to sort "2015 Chevrolet" under C (using "data-sort-value" or {{sort}}). Otherwise, I'm not seeing any problems with the table coding.
• FLC criteria:
• 1. I'd move "complying with IndyCar Series technical regulations" from the first to the second sentence. I don't get "engineer by". Otherwise, the prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the table seems fine. There's an argument that several links are Easter eggs; "March 84C chassis", for instance, links to a company rather than a product. But I'm actually okay with the way you do it, I think.
• 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
• 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
• 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
• 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
• 4. It is navigable.
• 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
• 6. It is stable.
• Support, since this is close enough to the finish line. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 05:20, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Have made the suggested changes MWright96 (talk) 07:20, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Doing now Aza24 (talk) 21:33, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

• I linked some publishers/websites to make the linking consistent.
• Reliability is fine, formatting is good – easy pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quick comments –

• "who receive a plague and have their names added to a permanent trophy on display at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway Museum." I would hope that they receive a plaque instead of a plague, and this is before considering that way too many of us have received a plague this year. unfortunately.
• Minor point, but the first two words of the List of recipients section are superfluous and the title could be shortened to Recipients without losing anything in translation. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:29, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
  • @Giants2008: Both points have been addressed. MWright96 (talk) 05:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Support – My pair of minor issues has been addressed. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 15:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 14 November 2020 (UTC) [23].

---

List of international goals scored by Andriy Shevchenko

Nominator(s): KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

This is the third international goals list that I am looking to become featured. Although I do not support any of the clubs he played at, Shevchenko is one of my favorite players to watch from the 2000s. I have expanded the sources and the prose, and I am looking for whatever details I need for it to become featured considering it already passes WP:FL?. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 20:53, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Kosack (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Comments by Kosack I'm not sure association footballer really works, it should either be association football player or just professional footballer. The lead is a bit light on info, and there is only 1074b of prose. With 48 goals to his name, there must be some notable goals worthy of inclusion? I don't know if it's perhaps a mobile issue, but the date column doesn't sort correctly for me. Why aren't the score columns sortable? eu-football.info has been called into question in previous FLCs, so I'd prepare a backup source if possible for those. AFS Enterprises is the publisher of 11v11.com. A rough pass over to pick out the most obvious issues I could see to get started. Kosack (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC) @Kosack: Finished your suggestions! KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 13:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC) A few more points from the new additions and a couple I didn't spot the first time "He is the Ukraine national team's all-time top goalscorer with 48 goals in 111 appearances, also making him the second most capped Ukrainian international behind Anatoliy Tymoshchuk (144)", source for any of this? "against Slovenia, Shevchenko scored", the subject hasn't changed from the first sentence so I would use he rather than Shevchenko again here. "leaving Ukraine to lose on aggregate 2–3", I'm not overly convinced of the wording here. Perhaps, "with Ukraine losing 3-2 on aggregate"? Link aggregate to Aggregate score. "captained the side to a second place finish behind Poland", source? "During 2006 FIFA World Cup qualification, Ukraine topped their qualifying group stage", can drop the second mention of qualifying here as it's already implied by the opening, same in the previous sentence also. Also stage is unnecessary I would say, they topped their group, not the stage. "automatically advancing them directly to the main competition in Germany and their first World Cup in history as an independent nation", this sentence seems a bit long winded. "Shevchenko captained the side to a penalty shoot-out victory against Switzerland", source? "but losing to eventual champions Italy in the quarter-finals", this run on doesn't really work grammatically "He decided to retire from international football after the final match in the group stage against England", source doesn't really support his decision to retire. Generally, digits below ten should be written as words rather than digits, so 7th > seventh, scored 9 goals > scored nine goals etc. There seems to be an unusual mix of scoreline formatting here, for example you have "in a 1–2 loss" and "with a 1–0 loss for Ukraine". It's generally accepted to say "in a 2-1" loss, irregardless of home and away status in European football. I would say the actual countries don't need linking in the table, per WP:OVERLINK. There are three BBC refs listed, one uses BBC Sport and the other two just BBC. Try to maintain one style for consistency. Kosack (talk) 14:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC) There still appears to be no ref for Tymoshchuk's inclusion. The goals by year table needs scope rows also. Kosack (talk) 07:17, 27 September 2020 (UTC) @KingSkyLord: Only minor changes left for my support here, any advance on these? Kosack (talk) 12:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC) @KingSkyLord: Kosack left this note more than three weeks ago, any chance you can respond? The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 22:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC) @The Rambling Man: Yes, I am currently busy at the moment. I will respond to it as soon as tomorrow. I have been very busy for the past month. If you want to finish some of it up, you can. However, I promise to complete it all by the end of the day tomorrow! KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 23:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC) @KingSkyLord: no problem. I won't be editing the list but I just wanted to know if the nomination was active. After you've made your updates, I'll review the list tomorrow. Cheers. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC) @The Rambling Man and Kosack: Alright. I've finished all of it. You both can go check now. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC) @KingSkyLord: eu.football.info has failed to pass several FLCs in the past, including my own, as there are no obvious signs of reliability. Is there another source available? Kosack (talk) 07:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC) @Kosack: Is National-Football-Teams good? I found it at the bottom of Tymoshchuk's article. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 15:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC) I think NFT is more solid and is widely used on Wiki so I'm much happier with that in place. Happy to support now. Kosack (talk) 09:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

;Comment by ChrisTheDude Agree the lead is short and could do with being beefed up 2nd should be written as second "a UEFA Euro 2012 group stage match against Sweden, which they would win 2–1" - unclear which team won "He decided to retire from international football after their final match" => again, clarify who "they" are "It ended with a 1–0 loss for the Ukraine" => "It ended with a 1–0 loss for Ukraine" I also can't make the date column sort correctly (or indeed at all) Locations (stadia, cities) which appear more than once should be linked each time, because if you re-sort the table based on another field, the linked listing may not be the first. Caption of the second image is not a complete sentence so doesn't need a full stop The refs to UEFA.com don't seem to support the relevant info. For example, ref 42 just goes to a page listing the reults of all games in Euro 2012 and doesn't even mention Shevchenko Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:34, 27 July 2020 (UTC) @KingSkyLord:, it's been a month since I commented above and I can't see that the points have been tackled, are you still working on this one.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: Yes. I am just very busy at the moment since summer ended. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 13:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC) No problem :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:36, 25 August 2020 (UTC) I made some changes, can you @ChrisTheDude: and @Kosack: please revisit and update your comments? Thanks -Cheetah (talk) 06:29, 27 August 2020 (UTC) Good work so far. My remaining comments would be that the lead still looks very "thin" at just 1075 characters (far too short for DYK), and some of the rows are referenced to UEFA.com pages which don't support the relevant information (e.g. the final two goals are referenced to a page which simply lists all the final scores from Euro 2012 and therefore doesn't confirm the date, the stadium, or for that matter the fact that Shevchenko scored the goals.....) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:26, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: I finally finished the prose. What do you think? If there are minor edits which can be done, you can do them and just pass it. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 17:55, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Doing now Aza24 (talk) 02:19, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

• Refs 3 and 4 missing authors
• Ref 5 missing author and date (scroll to the bottom)
• Refs 1–5 missing retrieval dates
• If you're going to link RSSSF the you should link BBC sport and UEFA – doesn't look like the rest of publishers/works/websites have WP pages
• Reliability is fine, statistical information from statistical websites. Aza24 (talk) 02:24, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
• Courtesy ping for @KingSkyLord: in case they have missed these comments. Aza24 (talk) 07:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Hi Aza24, I think I fixed your concerns. Please take another look. Thanks! Cheetah (talk) 05:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
    • Looks good, pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 08:37, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

• I gave the lead a copy edit and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
• Support ~ HAL333 19:40, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 15:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC) [24].

---

List of international goals scored by Ali Daei

Nominator(s): Mojtaba2361 (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because of it has covers Wp:Featured list criteria. Ali Daei is all-time men's top goalscorer with 109 goals and one of the Legend of AFC in all-time.this is one of the best list in this area.I've featured this list in fa wiki too. it has additional tables and informations from similar lists and i have improved it from this version to current version.i have noticed the details for all sections of this list too.thanks. Mojtaba2361 (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

this is my first nomination and i've searched many references and read very lists to do my best.i spent much times for improving this list.please help me to solve the problems.thanks all of you--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 03:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Source review – pass

• What makes teammelli.com a reliable source?
• What makes national-football-teams.com a reliable source?
• The references need to be tidied: for example, if teammelli.com is reliable, then refs #86 to #93 need to be expanded to give more detail, while some other references need to be made consistent.
• Is the "Record of Iran, When Daei scored" table original research based on the RSSSF list?
• The "Stadiums that Daei scored in them" table is unreferenced.
• The "Goals by year" table is unreferenced.
• The "Goals by competition" table is unreferenced.
• The "Goals by confederation" table is unreferenced.
• The "Goals by opposition" table is unreferenced.

That's it on a quick first pass. Harrias ^talk 06:56, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

thanks for your comment.first thing i must say that i checked all the same lists and get note from each for improving this list. both site are reliable,i asked before from an admin and they are used in many articles include some featured list.for 1st ref you can see Category:Iran national football team results and for second ref, we have this {{NFT player}} so they are reliable.86 to 93 are additional refs and i improve them as you say.the record of iran becomes from the main table.add green column for example for winning and so..i solved them--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Mojtaba2361: Sorry, let me be clearer in my wording. Please demonstrate what makes "teammelli.com" and "national-football-teams.com" reliable, based upon WP:RS. Saying that "an admin" says it is okay is not sufficient. All references must be filled out to include all relevant information in a consistent fashion to meet FL criteria. To avoid further confusion, I currently oppose the promotion of this list due to the sourcing concerns. Harrias ^talk 17:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: a few sites have ali daei's statistic because he was older footballer.many refs are from 11v11.com as you can see List of international goals scored by Alfredo Di Stéfano (other candidates of fl) that use this. please see List of top international men's football goal scorers by country, many refs are from National Football Teams.95% of refs in my list are from above site.A few of them from teammelli or national football (for auxiliary links).if team melli.com wasn't reliable it couldn't be used in many articles.the template i pointed above is for national football team site. if it doesn't reliable it can't have template. i'll solve your concern about ref.wait please..--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: i Resolved your worries about refs Harrias, are you satisfied with it?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: how is it now?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 21:07, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Just a note that I can see a lot of work has gone into this, and that I will return to review my concerns as soon as possible: tomorrow if I can. Harrias ^talk 21:09, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Further comments

• I am still unconvinced that national-football-teams.com meets our criteria for a reliable source, please demonstrate why you think it does.
• Ref #4 appears to be dead.
• Ref #7 is missing the author details "armband", apparently, and the title of the website is "Sports Nova".
• For refs #91 and #93, reformat the website as FBref.com, per their site, and add "Sports-Reference" as the publisher. Harrias ^talk 09:07, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: i don't know how can i exactly prove that site is reliable but i know that that site has articles in two wiki and footnote template {{NFT player}}. In addition, many articles in Wikipedia use it as a source like: List of top international men's football goal scorers by country, List of Lebanon international footballers, Benjamin Mendy, List of Republic of Ireland international footballers and Leslie Notši . Benjamin Strack-Zimmermann the writer of the site is famous writer in this area and my search showed his name existed in 5241 articles of wiki. Only 8 of 94 Refs are from this site(about 8%) because 11v11 doesn't cover those matches so we can be a little flexible for using it.thanks.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 00:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

ref 4 replaced with 2 other refs. other refs you said amended. Best regards--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 00:26, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

• I have started a discussion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Is national-football-teams.com a reliable source? to see if we can get any further on this issue with the help of WikiProject Football. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 09:43, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: please see the refs again. there's no separate NTF's refs.they are used as aid links.the main is RSSSF for those rows.is it ok now?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 04:10, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

It is still used alone as ref #10 and ref #48a. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 07:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

• Reformat ref #4 to remove the website address, and use Persian Gulf Pro League as the publisher.
• Format the title of ref #5 in title case, and add These Football Times as the work.
• Ref #9, "Persian Times" should be the work, not the publisher. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 07:14, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: ref 10 changed and others  Fixed--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 15:17, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for all your work on this, I am now content that the sourcing requirements of the FL criteria have been met. Note that I will claim WikiCup points for this review. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 15:32, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk)

;Comments An awful lot of work to do here, I'm afraid...... Lead image needs a better caption than just his name Lead should not be in six very short paragraphs "Ali Daei is the all-time men's top goalscorer and a former Iranian football player who holds the record for the most goals in international men's football" - this says exactly the same thing twice and should be reworded "His achievement listed in Guinness World Records" => "His achievement is listed in Guinness World Records" No explanation as to what "Team Melli" is "qualification for 1994 FIFA World Cup" => "qualification for the 1994 FIFA World Cup" "at Asian Cup qualifier in Tehran against Lebanon" => "in an Asian Cup qualifier in Tehran against Lebanon" "elevating him past Hungarian legend" - calling someone a legend is not NPOV "making him the first male player to score 100 goals in international caps" => "making him the first male player to score 100 goals in international football" "He has scored eight international Hat-tricks." - no reason for capital H there "On 1 March 2006, His final goal" - no reason for capital H there "His final caps for Team Melli was in 2006 FIFA World Cup" => "His final cap for Team Melli was in the 2006 FIFA World Cup" "final goal came in 3–2 victory over Costa Rica in friendly match" => "final goal came in a 3–2 victory over Costa Rica in a friendly match" "He scored eight goals against Maldives" => "He scored eight goals against the Maldives" Last sentence of the lead does not have a full stop "National Statistics" - no reason for capital S "All apperences" - second word is spelt wrong "Daei scored 109 goals in 149 Caps." - no reason for capital C Actually, both tables in this section are not standard in lists like this and should be removed anyway "(4)1–1(3)" - no explanation as to what this means. The result should be shown simply as 1-1 with the fact that Iran won on penalties in a footnote There is no key for the colours in the result column Hat-tricks section should not have a wikilink in the heading "Daei's last hat-trick against Laos, allowed him to become first male player to score 100 goals in international caps" => "Daei's last hat-trick against Laos allowed him to become the first male player to score 100 goals in international football." No other such article has a table breaking goals down by stadium - get rid of it Ref 1 - missing publication date Ref 2 - "Goal (website)" should be piped to Goal Refs 3 and 4 have no publisher, also the dates are in a completely different format to other refs Ref 5 - the publisher is not "national football team" Refs 9 and 10 missing publication date Ref 11 has the publisher as RSSSF.com, but ref 8 just had it as RSSSF Ref 63 has a strange random pipe at the start of the title Ref 68 is missing "11v11.com" Refs 86 to 93 have no publisher, publication date or access date What makes teammelli.com a reliable source? Can't you just re-use the 11v11 sources, anyway? Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC) thanks for your time to reviewing the article Mr.chris..one thing that i have to say is i done an innovation for this list,fore example: by stadium section. it shows that Daei scored in 74 matches and some other informations inspired from this FL so it can be use in similar lists in future (like hat-trick section that wasn't in similar FL lists in 2008 and they are new.Ronaldo's goals not included this part when become featured list,and it added recently).if others says they are extra too, i'll remove them at last.11v11.com doesn't have some matches and i replaced them with national.com or team melli (i explain above for Harris about this).cr7's list has not key for the colours too but i add key for this list.all of above about sentences and refs and lead  Done.i'll improve lead a little more. thanks a lot--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 01:22, 19 September 2020 (UTC) I'll see what other people think, but if the venues section is kept, the heading should be "Goals by venue" because "venues of scoring" is not good English. And the title of the table should be "Goals by stadium" not what it currently is...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC) thanks.i changed the titles.anything more?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 15:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC) Yes, quite a lot. The lead is still in six tiny paragraphs. the "all appearances" and "scoring matches" tables are still there, which I said should be removed. There is still at least one random capital letter in the middle of a sentence. There are still references with bad formatting. Please read all my points above and action them all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:52, 19 September 2020 (UTC) @Harrias and ChrisTheDude: hello.i changed the refs and adding Rsssf helping link near of 2 sites.the links include iran's squads and daei's goals. Are you satisfied with it?--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 03:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC) Still not seeing much evidence of the reliability of teammelli.com........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: all of above  Done, lead improved, refs changed and amended, two sections deleted.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 02:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC) Further comments Lead image caption needs a full stop "elevating him past Hungarian footballer, Ferenc Puskás" - no reason for that comma "Daei was called up to join Iran national football team" => "Daei was called up to join the Iran national football team" Why is Team Melli shown once in italics and once not? You also don't need to wikilink Team Melli twice in the same paragraph "his final goal came in 3–2 victory" => "his final goal came in a 3–2 victory" "His final appearance for Team Melli was in 2006 FIFA World Cup" => "His final appearance for Team Melli was in the 2006 FIFA World Cup" "in a 8–0 win" => "in an 8–0 win" "On 17 November 2004, his last hat-trick against Laos" => "On 17 November 2004, he scored his last hat-trick against Laos" "He has scored 44 international goals" => "He scored 44 international goals" Ref 5 lists Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation as the publisher but other refs from the same site do not Ref 88 lists no publisher Ref 9 uses publisher=national football team, other refs list website=national-football-teams.com Nearly there :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: all of above  Done. thanks for your accuracy and helping me. i have a little experience,but i'll learn from you for my FL's projects in the future.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
• Support -- Editor7798 (talk) 19:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
• On a very cursory read, I'm spotting issues. "Iranian football player" seems like an WP:EGG. "Tehran times" is incorrect capitalization. There's a missing space at the end of a sentence in the introduction. Alt text is missing. I assume that for every error I spotted, there's likely quite a few I didn't. This needs some more work. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

  @Sdkb: thanks for your cm. I amended them. I done many works for this article. Every featured nomination can have particall problems for solving. I have a few FL in Fawiki and a little experience here but i'll learn more and more--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 01:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from MWright96 (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

====Comments by MWright96==== The two images should include alt text per MOS:ALT "who holds the record of" - of the "elevating him past Hungarian footballer Ferenc Puskás to top the" - to take the lead of the The wikilink ECO Cup should be directed to 1993 ECO Cup "His first international goal came in the 6–0 win" - a 6–0 victory Friendly match(es) should be wikilinked on the first mention not the second "Daei scored 36 goals in FIFA World Cup qualification" - the word "matches" should be included at the end of this portion of text "and 23 goals in AFC Asian Cup qualification" - the word "games" is better to be added at the end of this text for clarification The wikilink for AFC Asian Cup Finals in the fourth paragraph should be changed from AFC Asian Cup to List of AFC Asian Cup finals "His final appearance for Team Melli was in the 2006 FIFA World Cup against Angola." - the date of this match could be benefical to include For the above sentence, it would also be benefical to include what stage of the World Cup Daei played his final international match "he scored his last hat-trick against Laos in a 2006 FIFA World Cup Qualification," - the word "match" is missing from the end of this portion of text "He scored 44 international goals at Azadi Stadium," - at the Azadi Stadium should be linked once not twice in the lead "his highest tally against one country" - any In both the international goals and hat-trick tables, there needs to be more rowspan templates in the venue sections where appropriate so it can be expanded from just one single game where Daei scored one or more goals at the same venue to successive games at the same venue where Daei scored one or more goals. See List of international goals scored by Sunil Chhetri for an example. All of the dates in the dates columns in the international goals and hat-tricks tables could do with the addition of the date table sorting template. Template:Date table sorting will provider further details on how to do this. The four mentions of the phrase "friendly matches" in the international goals table should be replaced by just "Friendly" A table caption is missing from the top of the hat-tricks table to comply with MOS:ACCESS. This quote by PresN might apply to this list: "In the case that the table is the first thing in a section where the section header is essentially the same as what the caption would be, and therefore looks duplicative visually, you can make the caption screen reader-only with the {{sronly}} template, e.g. "|+ {{sronly|Example table caption}}" instead of " The goals by year table in the statistics section is missing the scope="col" for the columns The goals by year table should ideally be made sortable for assessibility All three of the notes should have a referenced added to the end of them for verifiablity The hyphens in refs 5 and 92 need to be replaced by en dashes (–) per MOS:DASH Reference 5 is missing the authors The word nova in "Sport nova" in Reference 7 should begin with a capital letter The title of Reference 87 should not be in all capital letters per MOS:ALLCAPS Same issue as above but with Reference 92 The word times in "Tehran times" in Reference 8 should start with a capital letter That's all I've got for this review. Plenty to do for the nominator. MWright96 (talk) 13:45, 26 September 2020 (UTC) @MWright96: Hello. Thanks for your time to reviewing the article and helping me. All of above  Done. I learned a lot from you and your accuracy. best regards.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 01:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Support – I have made two minor changes to the prose in the lead. MWright96 (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

many thanks--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Support - I can't see any issues.Pinkfloyd amir (talk) 15:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from TRM

• Every para of the lead starts with his (sur)name. Repetitive.
• Make it clear that it's association football as many of our readers have no idea that other codes of football exist.
• "all-time men's international top goalscorer" piped to a redirect, no good reason.
• FourFourTwo is a work.
• "On 28 November 2003, in an Asian Cup qualifier in Tehran against Lebanon, he scored his 85th ..." seems odd to discuss this before discussing his first ever international goal.

  the 1st para is about his record and it is a date for that--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 11:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

• " (also known as Team Melli) " only used once subsequently so remove and just refer to Iran as Iran.
• Tehran is overlinked in the lead.
• As is Laos.
• "in a friendly matches" just "match" here.
• "hat-trick" is used in three consecutive sentences making for boring and repetitive prose, please rework it.
• "Daei scored 36 goals in FIFA World Cup qualification matches and 23 goals in AFC Asian Cup qualification games, as well as 14 goals in AFC Asian Cup Finals. The remainder of his goals, 27," 36+23+14+27 = 100. But he scored 109? You've left out the 9 at the Asian Games....
• "against the Maldives and Laos," against two opposition teams, the Maldives and Laos.
• What makes fbref.com a WP:RS?

That's it on a really swift first pass. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

The Rambling Man thanks for your Cm TRM. i amended all of above.--Mojtaba2361 (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

• Support --John B123 (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 15:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2020 (UTC) [25].

---

List of accolades received by 1917 (2019 film)

Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

1917 is a 2019 war film directed and co-written by Sam Mendes. Inspired by stories told to the director by his grandfather, it chronicles the story of two young British soldiers (played by George MacKay and Dean-Charles Chapman) in the spring of 1917 during World War I, who are given a mission to deliver a message warning of an ambush, soon after the German retreat to the Hindenburg Line during Operation Alberich. This is my first second film accolades list I am attempting to promote, and I largely based the format off of List of accolades received by The Artist (film) which was promoted in October 2015. I will gladly accept your comments to improve this list. Birdienest81 (talk) 16:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:21, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

;Comments "Universal Pictures initially gave the film a limited release in eleven theaters" - it's a British film, so "theatres" should be spelt correctly the British way ;-) (updated to add) Actually in Britain we don't refer to cinemas as theatres, so it might be best just to put "cinemas"..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC) You should also use British date formats, so 10 January 2020, not January 10, 2020 Random aside: gosh, did this film only come out this January? I saw it at the cinema and it seems a lot longer ago, but I guess that's down to the crazy year we've all had....... None of the notes are complete sentences, so they don't need full stops Sorting order on the result column goes Won > Runner-up > Pending > Nominated > 21st > 11th, which seems very odd........? Think that's genuinely all I could find to pick up on - great work overall! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:05, 20 September 2020 (UTC) @ChrisTheDude: I've finally fixed almost all the things you mentioned for above. The only thing I have not been able to fix is the results column. I really do not know how to fix it. Furthermore other film accolades lists that are featured list status such as List of accolades received by Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse and List of accolades received by La La Land seem to have this sorting order as well. So, I really don't know about that one. Otherwise thanks for the feedback. --Birdienest81 (talk) 23:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC) That La La Land one is a complete mess. It goes Won > Runner-up > Nominated > 10th > 9th > 8th > 7th > 6th > 5th > 4th > 3rd > 2nd, so 2nd ranks lower than 3rd. That doesn't seem to make any sense to me. In the case of the 1917 list, can you use a sorting template so that 11th at least ranks better than 21st? And "pending" should probably go at the bottom. That would fix this one...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2020 (UTC) I threw in a {{sort}} to fix this. Harrias talk 06:22, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support - nice one Harrias on the assist :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Doing shortly Aza24 (talk) 20:35, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• ref 16 and 17 both missing date and author
• ref 26 missing retrieval date
• A translated title for ref 26 would be nice as well "|trans-title="
• ref 27 missing needs either publisher, website or work parameter
• ref 32 missing date
• ref 28 missing author and date
• ref 34 missing author and date
• ref 50 missing author and date
• ref 51 missing author and date
• ref 57 shouldn't be in all caps, it's a WP:MOS thing
• ref 59 missing author
• ref 60 missing author
• Everything else looks good. Reliability is fine. Aza24 (talk) 22:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Aza24:: Fixed: I have fixed everything listed above. Thanks for the feedback

--Birdienest81 (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Yes everything looks good now. Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 03:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

• Support I tried but I couldn't find anything. I remember seeing this last year — seems so long ago. )= ~ HAL333([26]) 20:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

• Quick comment – This is a relatively minor issue, but according to MOS:LAYOUT, the one see also link should go before the notes. That is all I found. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:26, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

• Done: I have switched the See Also and Notes sections accordingly.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 18:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• Please add the date in sources 16, 17, 18

• Fixed: There are now dates in all references.

• Typo in source no. 25: Upoan > Upon

• Fixed: Corrected misspelled word in title.

• Source no. 26 Does not show about the winners and nominations. Please find another source.

• Fixed: Replaced source with one showing winners.

• Source no. 41: This source does not show the winners. Please find another source, or add another source with the winners.
  • If you are adding another source and keeping this, change the title of this source to: ‘Hollywood,’ ‘Marriage Story,’ top nominations for Houston film critics’ awards

• Fixed: Added source from Houston Chronice that contains winners (might not appear if using incognito or private mode on browser).
  • Unable to review, as it says "article limit reached"

• The source said "article limit reached" because of a paywall. That does not mean the source is unacceptable because someone else can verify the source as per Wikipedia:PAYWALL policy. It's like the same thing as a reference in a book. One may not have access to the actual book, but someone can go access it if they have it in a library. Nevertheless, I replaced the Houston Chronicle sources with ones from the actual ones from the Houston Film Critics Society. I checked for pop up advertisements and such, and there has been none so far. So I fixed it.

• Yes, I know. I did not intend my comment to appear as an oppose. I just wanted to let you know I had been unable to review it. However, you did a good thing by replacing the Houston Chronicle sources with ones from the actual ones from the Houston Film Critics Society.

• Source no. 69: This source does not show the winners. Please find another source, or add another source with the winners.

• This source DOES SHOW the winners and nominees. If you keep scrolling down, there is a section that has the heading "THE 2019 WAFCA AWARD WINNERS" which contains the winners and another section that reads "The 2019 WAFCA AWARD NOMINEES WERE" wchich contains the nominees. Here is a screenshot of the winners section and another screenshot of the nominees section if you doubt me.

• Add the author names in sources 64, 71

• There is no author for ref 64 (now ref 65) since that website is not an article, but rather a webpage that just lists the winners. I went to the accolades page for Avengers: Endgame and the ref for the Seattle Film Critics Society contains no author. As for the last one I removed it because the reference before it already has an author and it sufficiently mentions the nomination along with its two nominated screenwriters.

Surge_Elec (talk) 18:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

@Surge elec: I have addressed all your comments. Thank you for your feedback.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 01:23, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Additional Comments

• Test first - When I clicked on source no. 57, I was redirected to advertisements on the same tab. The first time, three such advertisements came then this source opened. The second time, two advertisements came and this source opened. Please consider finding another source.

• Fixed: I initially got the same problem. So, I tried searching on Google for the OFCS website. I redid the entire citation reference. So it should work.

• In the sources, link the publishers / companies, to their respective Wikipedia pages: The Hollywood Reporter, Entertainment Weekly, Deadline Hollywood, Variety (magazine), Houston Chronicle, IGN.

• Fixed: Wikilinked all the periodical titles and websites in the resources.

@Surge elec: I responded to your latest comments. Thank you

--Birdienest81 (talk) 20:24, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

You had missed three. I Wikilinked them. I made two more edits. And now, I am happy to support. Surge_Elec (talk) 21:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Promoting. --PresN 15:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC) [27].

---

List of herpestids

Nominator(s): PresN 21:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

We continue my animals-in-a-family journey through Carnivora (previously: felids/canids/mustelids/procyonids/ursids/mephitids/viverrids) with list #8: herpestids, encompassing the 34 species of herpestidae, aka mongooses (not, unfortunately, "mongeese"). These are fairly well known as a family—though the variety may be surprising—as most zoos have at least one of these species, usually the most famous one: the meerkat of television fame. As far as variety goes, however, unlike many families most of these species look fairly similar and are of similar sizes. Information on a lot of them is pretty scant as most are found in various bits of central-ish Africa; as a result, we're missing images for a few of them, and a few others have to make do with drawings. As always, the list format is based on the prior lists and reflects FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 21:48, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Quick comments from mujinga

• overall looks very good to me, I like the maps showing the range of each creature
• the photo in the infobox is momentarily confusing since the yellow one in the pic is not the yellow mongoose
• "The species listed here are based on data from the Paleobiology Database, unless otherwise cited" nothing else is cited, so seems unnecessary to say "unless otherwise cited" Mujinga (talk) 00:25, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Mujinga: Yeah, I didn't make that image; I find having a bright yellow mongoose not be the "yellow" one odd too, but animal names often don't make much sense in a global context. Removed the "unless otherwise cited" bit. --PresN 16:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• on the image would it be clearer to say "(clockwise from top left)" instead of "(top left to bottom right)"? Mujinga (talk) 16:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• @Mujinga: Done, yeah, I think that's clearer. --PresN 19:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• I'll support then although I would be happier if someone who knows more than me about herpestids gave an opinion here also Mujinga (talk) 16:33, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• Should White-tailed mongoose have a capital W in the middle of a sentence?
• Is there an appropriate wikilink for "neritic marine"? It seems an obscure term......
• Think that's it from me. You've definitely got these down to a fine art now :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• @ChrisTheDude: It should not, no; linked neritic zone. Thanks! --PresN 16:16, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support I tried, but I couldn't find anything. ~ HAL333([28]) 17:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Source review – All of the references to are high-quality reliable sources and are well-formatted. The link-checker tool shows no issues, so I think we can call this source review a pass. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 23:07, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [29].

---

Wales national football team results 1920–1939

Nominator(s): Kosack (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

I already have one active nomination, but it currently has three supports, a source review and no outstanding comments, so I believe it's OK for me to open up the next one. List number 3 of the Wales results series is ready to go now I feel and follows the same format as the previous two. Thanks to HawkAussie for doing much of the grunt work in converting the table before I got there. I look forward to any comments. Kosack (talk) 14:07, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• "They went on to win the competition for only the second time in the nation's history after drawing with Scotland before defeating England for the first time since 1882" - bit of a long and tangled clause, suggest a re-write
• The above sentence also doesn't say what year this refers to. I presume it's 1920, following on from the previous sentence, but "they went on to....." could refer to a later year
• "The 1938–39 British Home Championship was the final hosting of the tournament before World War I" - spot the typo (or temporal anomaly :-))
• "Of the 62 matches Wales played during this period, they won 22: 8 against England" - any chance you could reword that so it doesn't look at a quick glance like they won an incredibly high-scoring game against England?
• If the game in 1933 against France was the first time Wales had ever played non-British opposition, I would mention it far more prominently than in the last sentence, where it comes across a bit like an afterthought.....
• Think that's it from me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Thanks for taking a look Chris, I've had a crack at fixing the above points. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 19:20, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support - nice one :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Harrias

NB: I am competing in the WikiCup and may claim points for this review.

Sorry I missed the last list, but it looks like you got it sorted anyway!

• "..dubbed "Keenor and the ten unknowns".." By whom?
• "..achieved a creditable draw with Scotland.." The use of "creditable" here is an opinion and needs attribution.
• "..with Wales playing.." Avoid the Noun plus -ing|noun plus -ing construction used here.
• "The 1938–39 British Home Championship was the final hosting of the tournament before World War II, with Wales playing their final match of the period against France in May 1939. They had played France on one occasion beforehand, in May 1933, the first time Wales had faced a team other than the Home Nations." I understand why you've done it this way, but writing about the final match of the period, and then going back to discuss a match in 1933 feels odd, I wonder consider swapping these sentences around, and checking how the flow is then.
• Is there photo from the era we can use in the top right, above the navbox?

Overall, great work: the prose is well-written, the table works brilliantly and meets all the requirements of MOS:ACCESS. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 16:02, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: Thanks for taking a look. I've rewritten the parts you picked out above, let me know what you think. In regards to an image, there's not much freely available. Most of the images hosted on Commons for this era didn't make it through a previous FAC review, so probably aren't appropriate. Kosack (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support no worries, I guessed that might be the case. A shame, but not unsurprising for the era. Nice work as usual! Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 06:15, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support Couldn't find anything to pick you up on. ~ HAL333([30]) 17:49, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

• If you're including a location for Stead, you should include one for Oliver

Added. Kosack (talk) 10:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

• The ways the references stand now make it unclear where the information for either table is sourced from, this needs to be addressed somehow otherwise the reader would not be sure where to go to verify the information in the tables Aza24 (talk) 01:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

  @Aza24: Addressed the two points above. I accidentally combined the refs rather than splitting into the statistics/general format used in previous lists. Kosack (talk) 10:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Kosack, I would say its best to move the statistics citations next to the table (as inline citations) so they're clearly available for the reader. You could opt to do so like List of operas by Carl Maria von Weber#List of operas with a reference after the table name, or like the bottom of List of presidents of the United States#Presidents as examples; at the very a least a note at the top of the table referring to the statistics section as the references would suffice. Aza24 (talk) 05:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Added a note directing readers to the statistics section below. Kosack (talk) 08:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for that, everything looks good now. I found no reliability issues or further formatting issues. Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from TRM

• " in their remaining games secured the second Home Championship in Wales' history in the 1919–20 tournament." reorg: " in their remaining games in the 1919–20 tournament secured the second Home Championship in Wales' history."
• "release Welsh players" explain: "for international competition" or similar.
• " in which Wales" -> "where Wales"
• "conceding 17 goals in the process and scoring only 2 in reply." -> "conceding 17 goals while scoring just 2" or similar.
• Link "non-League".
• " before being replaced by more senior players" odd phrasing. I guess you mean the Welsh team had more senior players in the next match but this is a little unclear.
• " 8 against England and Ireland and 6 against" ->" 8 against both England and Ireland, and 6 against"
• Tynecastle Park doesn't need to be piped.
• Gibson, Fowler and O'Callaghan piped to redirects.

That's it for me. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 00:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: Thanks for the review, I've addressed all of the points above. Let me know what you think. Kosack (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

• Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 10:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [31].

---

Philo T. Farnsworth Award

Nominator(s): MWright96 (talk) 11:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Something different from yours truly, an television engineering and technology award called the Philo T. Farnsworth Award. Named after the inventor of the first fully all-electronic television system Philo Farnsworth, the award is presented as part of the Primetime Engineering Emmy Awards to companies, agencies and organizations who have made a great impact in television engineering and technology. I believe the list meets the criteria to become a featured list and look forward to all comments and concerns. MWright96 (talk) 11:21, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~ HAL333([32]) 21:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Comments You should center the refs with |style="text-align:center;"|}} That's about it. ~ HAL333([33]) 17:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC) @HAL333: Have added the code into the table. MWright96 (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~ HAL333([34]) 21:16, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• "The ATAS present" - I would suggest this should be "The ATAS presents"
• "....designed by television engineer Louis McManus at an annual award ceremony" - this kinda reads like he designed it at an awards ceremony, might need a slight reword
• Think that's it from me - great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: Have addressed both points. MWright96 (talk) 19:48, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
• Suport -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:18, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review – pass

NB: I am competing in the WikiCup and may claim points for this review.

• All major content is sourced.
• Ref #3 has a couple of issues: it says it is from the "Television in American Society Reference Library", but it looks like an "Encyclopedia.com" article? It also has a published date from after the archive date.
• Ref #9, surely "D. McAdams, Deborah" should be "McAdams, Deborah D."?
• Ref #14, "Deadline Hollywood" should be a work, not a publisher.
• All references are to sources which meet the requirements of WP:RS.
• References are made in an appropriate, consistent style (with the exceptions of the minor points above.)
• One minor non-source related point: could you expand the Nationality column to show the whole country name, not just the three letter code?

That's it. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 15:48, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

• • @Harrias: Have made changes in accordance with the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 16:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
    • All good then, source review passed. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 19:43, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Medusa

• {{Primetime Emmy Award categories}} seems to be open all the time, consider adding state=collapsed
• [[Video assist|video assists]] → video assists

• Nice work! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• @CAPTAIN MEDUSA: Have addressed both points. MWright96 (talk) 13:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:59, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:27, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [35].

---

List of World Heritage Sites in the Netherlands

Nominator(s): Tone 15:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

With the successful promotion of Lithuania and the nomination of Sweden going well, it's time we move to the new region. The Netherlands has quite some sites, and some are overseas. I'm not sure if the layout of the two maps it optimal but we can play with that. The rest of the list follows the standard style. Tone 15:52, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• Surely the Netherlands and Curacao should be linked in the lead?
• Could do with an explanation in the lead of Curacao's status
• "The first site added to the list was Schokland and Surroundings, in 1995" - no reason for that comma
• There's an unnecessary gap before ref 2
• "It was an inhabited peninsula since pre-historic times" => "It is a peninsula which had been inhabited since prehistoric times"
• "It is the only fortification....." - in the Netherlands? The whole world?
• "draininig the water from the polders" - first word is spelt wrong
• "Construction of hydraulic began" - hydraulic what? There's at least one word missing here
• "Willemstad was established as a trading settlement by the people" => "Willemstad was established as a trading settlement by people". Is there a more specific word than "people"? Were they merchants?
• "which reflect the mix of Dutch cultural influences with those of Spanish and Portuguese" => "which reflect the mix of Dutch, Spanish and Portuguese cultural influences"
• " large sections of the population of Low Countries" => " large sections of the population of the Low Countries"
• "and, under the supervision of Johannes van den Bosch constructed" - need a comma after Bosch to close off the clause
• "combination of education, healthcare and (forced) labour" - earlier you used US English spelling "-ize", so you should change the spelling of the last word to match this
• "to ensure the self-sufficiecy" - spelt wrong
• "They were run on slave labour" - same note re: US spelling
• "Curaçao is a constitute country" - penultimate word is spelt wrong
• Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
  • @ChrisTheDude: I'm through, sorry it took a while. All fixed. I got rid of the footnotes (from some previous versions) as I could get everything to the lead. --Tone 20:06, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Doing now Aza24 (talk) 05:34, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

• Given that all of the sources, other than 3, are UNESCO sources everything looks good. The other 3 are reliable and formatted correctly, pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 05:40, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
• Support - sorry I forgot to revisit this one for so long...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:07, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
• Support Nice work. ~ HAL333 04:38, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments from TRM

• "The Netherlands accepted" our article is at Netherlands so I'd expect this to read "The Netherlands accepted..."

Fixed.

• Now for confusion. Is it the Netherlands or the Kingdom of the Netherlands??

I think I got this right. Netherlands as the country, per UNESCO. Kingdom, because of Curaçao and Bonnaire.

• "[3][4][5]." errant full stop.

Done.

• "Schokland symbolizes the struggle of the people of the Netherlands against the sea." tourist brochure time.

Good point, rephrased.

• "in 1859. In the 1940s" repetitive.

Rephrased.

• "symbolizes" vs "defence" vs "kilometre" which variant of English is in play here?

Will go with the UK style.

• Link every linked item in the table every time, it's sortable. E.g. polder isn't linked first time anyway....

Added link. Not sure if I got all you had in mind.

• "Water Board Assembly Houses" what are these? Captialised, notable?

This is from the source.

• "Ir.D.F. Woudagemaal (D.F. Wouda Steam Pumping Station)" is piped to a redirect, why?
• Link Friesland. And Wouda.

Fixed both.

• "It still functions today" see WP:CURRENTLY.

@The Rambling Man: This one is tricky. I see the same comment for the Poland list. I have two options here. I could either go with "at the time of listing", as per the source, or I could check the homepage of the place and say As of 2020, though this sounds a bit OR/SYNTH to me. What do you suggest? I am more inclined to the first option.

First option works for me. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 18:59, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: Done :) --Tone 19:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

• "with the Renaissance planning principles." no need for "the".

Fixed.

• "four units make up a square" don't understand this.

Removed, little added value.

• "of De Stijl movement" of the De Stijl...
• "It is now preserved ..." as above "now/today/currently" etc.
• "harbouring species such as harbour seal" unfortunate repeat of "harbour"
• "2,700 hectares" convert.
• "over ... over" one could be "more than".
• "entire Caribbean Sea" no need for Sea.
• " and (forced) labor to " vs " slave labor", call it as it is?

Not this one, that was partially a penal colony. The one in Curaçao was slave labor.

• "y tropical climate. Due to the climate," repetitive.

Reworded.

• "along the river Rhine" river is nugatory.

Probably.

That's it on a quick run. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 23:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

@The Rambling Man: I'm through, just let me know what you think about the point above. Great review, thanks! --Tone 17:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

• Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 20:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [36].

---

List of stupas in Nepal

Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 08:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Stupas are used as a place of meditation. This list shows notable stupas in Nepal. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 08:21, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• You say "This list shows notable stupas in Nepal" - are there others? If the ones listed are the notable ones, what makes them notable and the rest not notable?
• "Stupas in Nepal date back to the Licchavi period," - that comma should be a semi-colon
• "Swayambhunath is one of the oldest known building in the country that was likely built in the 5th century CE" => "Swayambhunath is one of the oldest known buildings in the country and was likely built in the 5th century CE"
• "Ashoka's daughter Charumati who married a Nepali prince; built" => "Ashoka's daughter Charumati, who married a Nepali prince, built"
• "which badly damaged and completely destroyed the top part" - well if it was completely destroyed then clearly it was badly damaged, so the first part is redundant
• "Near Thamel, Kaathe Swayambhu, a replica of the Swayambhunath is located that was built in 1650" => "Kaathe Swayambhu, a replica of the Swayambhunath that was built in 1650, is located near Thamel"
• "there are few stupas" => "there are several stupas"
• "The World Peace Pagoda was built by Japanese Buddhist" => "The World Peace Pagoda was built by Japanese Buddhists" (unless it was genuinely built by just one guy :-))
• "near the stupa, there is a gravestone of a monk who murdered" => "near the stupa is the gravestone of a monk who was murdered"
• No co-ordinates for The Great Drigung Kagyud Lotus Stupa - surely its location is known?
• The "established" column does not sort correctly
• Stupas which are heritage sites do not have the dagger symbol against them which the key suggests they should
• In the table you use BC and AD, but in the lead you used BCE and CE
• Where there is more than one ref on a row, they should be in correct numerical order
• Think that's it from me. Thanks for an interesting read about a subject I knew nothing about....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

ChrisTheDude, All done. To become notable to be in this list, it must receive basic coverage via books, news etc. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 11:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

• Support, although if all of these are considered notable then it would be nice to see articles created on the three that are currently redlinks..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:20, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~ HAL333([37]) 20:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments You should change said to him "not to interfere with the site" to ordered him "not to interfere with the site" I second Chris when it comes to the three red-linked articles. Everything else looks great. ~ HAL333([38]) 00:37, 6 October 2020 (UTC) HAL333, Thanks for the comments! All done. I will create the article when I have some spare time.~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support ~ HAL333([39]) 20:21, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

• As I couldn't find any issues with reliability and these formatting concerns below are minor I have implemented them myself. Pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 00:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• ref 5 as a book needs an identifier of some kind. There's no ISBN but an OCLC on world cat
• ref 26 needs OCLC Aza24 (talk) 00:53, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments

• The list still mixes AD, B.C., and CE. Chose one of BC–AD or BCE–CE (and not B.C.). Charumati Stupa is furthermore noted as established in the "4th century" while Swayambhunathdagger as "5th century CE". I guess "CE" can be skipped here.
• Some stupas have "stupa" included in their name, others not. World Peace Pagod is called a pagoda, not a stupa. Myanmar Golden Temple is called a temple. How come?
• Are there suitable interlanguage links to add to the red-linked articles?
• There are four UNESCO World Heritage Sites in the list but no mention of this in the lead, it could be worth to add a line or two about it.

That's it from me at the moment. Yakikaki (talk) 09:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Yakikaki, I believe that I have resolved your comments. Stupas can be called by various names such as "pagoda" "temple" etc. Also, I could not find any interlanguage links. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, the list still mixes AD and B.C. though. Please remove the B.C. and replace it with BC. Yakikaki (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Yakikaki, Done, Thanks. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:08, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Sorry to be a bother but I had one more thing in mind. I would suggest you to switch places between the first sentence of the lead, and the first part of the second sentence until the semi-colon ("Stupas in Nepal date back to the Licchavi period"), and then bold Stupas in Nepal in accordance with MOS:BOLDLEAD. Yakikaki (talk) 15:16, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Yakikaki, Done. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 15:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

All my comments have been swiftly addressed. I hereby give my support. Yakikaki (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [40].

---

List of Most Played Juke Box Folk Records number ones of 1946

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Sorry everyone, it's yet another country music number ones list. So far 55 of these have been successfully promoted to FL, so I next present the list for 1946, when notably the chart methodology of the time allowed no fewer than four songs to tie for the number-one spot in one week..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:55, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments from Harrias

NB: I am competing in the WikiCup and might claim points for this review.

• Table query: why do you merge cells for the Title, Artist(s) and Ref. columns, but not the Issue date?
• Consider using {{Abbr|Ref.|Reference}} to produce Ref. in place of just "Ref." in the header row.
• File:Bob Wills Texas Playboys Publicity Photo - Cropped.jpg The license claims that "it was published in the United States between 1925 and 1977", but the date listed in the information is 2013. This needs to be corrected so that we can demonstrate that the license is appropriate.
• Other images seem fine to me.
• "..the "King of Western swing"." According to who? If this was a common moniker, maybe just rephrase to something like "..who was widely know as the "King of Western swing"."

That's it from me. There's a few "would this" and "would that"s I would changed to a straight past tense, but nothing major. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 16:15, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

@Harrias: - all addressed, hopefully to your satisfaction. I ultimately decided to swap the lead image for a different one..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

NB when I merged the rows for the dates it caused some of the song/artist/ref rows to disappear (Dick Thomas against February 2 was one) and I couldn't for the life of me figure out what the issue was, so I wound up going with a sort of halfway house...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support, nice work: prose is of good quality, the list meets ACCESS requirements, all the stuff I'd expect from a FL pro. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 19:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support - Can't find anything, nice work! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 13:23, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
• Support Nothing I could pick up on. I look forward to the day when I can support your nomination for this massive featured topic. (= ~ HAL333([41]) 22:51, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your kind words, HAL333. The only issue I can see with a potential FT is the "cap stone" article. I can't see how List of Billboard number-one country hits could be expanded to FL status...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:53, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
    • Oh well... ~ HAL333([42]) 16:12, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
      • HAL333 - it might be possible, I've had a germ of an idea today...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
        • Fingers crossed (; ~ HAL333([43]) 16:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
          • I think it should be possible. But if not, remember that WP:WIAFT #3(c) says that: "Items that are ineligible for featured article, featured list or good article status, either due to their limited subject matter (in the case of lists only) or due to inherent instability (in the case of either articles or lists), must have passed an individual quality audit that included a completed peer review, with all important problems fixed. Such items do not count towards criteria 1(a), 3(a)(ii), or 3(b)(i)." Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 17:03, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review - Pass

Pass – I updated the ISBN 10s to 13. Consistent formatting and reliability, good work as always Aza24 (talk) 01:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC) [44].

---

List of awards and nominations received by Joaquin Phoenix

Nominator(s): ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Joaquin Phoenix is an American actor who has received various awards and nominations, including one Academy Award. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 14:57, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

;Comments "Phoenix's breakthrough role in the critically acclaimed Ridley Scott's epic historical action-drama" - words are not in the right order, it should be "Phoenix's breakthrough role in Ridley Scott's critically-acclaimed epic historical action-drama" No need for comma after the title of that film "where he played as the American singer" => "where he played the American singer" "where he plays as a World War II Navy veteran" - again, the word "as" is not needed "In 2013, Phoenix starred in romantic science-fiction drama Her, he received widespread critical acclaim for his performance" => "In 2013, Phoenix starred in romantic science-fiction drama Her, and received widespread critical acclaim for his performance" Might be worth also mentioning You Were Never Really Here in the lead, as he won 11 acting awards, as many as he did for Gladiator "Best Actor (tied with Adam Driver for Marriage Story)" - film title should be in italics Should mention that for the roles for which he won the awards in 1984 and 1990, he acted under the name Leaf Phoenix Think that's it from me, great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:55, 14 October 2020 (UTC) ChrisTheDude, All done. Thanks for the comments! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 17:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Resolved comments from ~ HAL333([45]) 12:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Comments Instead of Walk the Line, where, Walk the Line, in which may be more appropriate. Same thing with psychological drama The Master, where To be a little repetitive you could change the "plays" in he plays a World War II Navy veteran to "portrays". In the sentence In 2013, Phoenix starred in romantic science-fiction drama Her, and received widespread critical acclaim for his performance., the comma after "Her" is not needed. You could remove it, add "he" afterwards, or maybe change it to something like for which he received widespread... Otherwise great work again. =) ~ HAL333([46]) 21:16, 14 October 2020 (UTC) HAL333, All done. Thanks for the comments! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:29, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

• Happy to Support this nomination. ~ HAL333([47]) 12:35, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review – Pass

Resolved comments from RunningTiger123 (talk) 14:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Here are the key issues that need to be changed. Sources 28-30, 50, 83, 102, and 108 need to be updated; they only list him as a nominee, not the winner. Sources 32, 90, 94, 113, and 122 do not mention Phoenix. Source 38 is by The Austin Chronicle, not the Austin Film Critics Association, and it should have an author and publication date. Source 58 is by WDIV-TV, not the Detroit Film Critics Society, and it should have an author and publication date. Sources 75 and 88 do not specify placement, so those rows should use "Nominated" instead. Source 105 seems sketchy – it says it's pulling its information from IMDb, which is not a reliable source. Source 114 does not name Phoenix. I know he's in the scene that is being nominated, but I'm not sure if making that connection constitutes OR. Source 116 does not state if Phoenix received the award for a specific movie. Source 117 does not mention Phoenix receiving a nomination. Source 119 says the TIFF Tribute Actor Award is a career honor, not an award for a specific film (i.e. Joker). In addition, the following items are formatting issues I noticed. They're not urgent or entirely necessary, but if you have time, I'd look into cleaning them up. Source 1 needs a date. Sources 3 and 4 should probably use Young Artist Awards instead of YoungArtistAwards. Sources 41, 45, 49, 76, 81, 82, 86, 87, 88, 89, 95, 99, 109, and 117 could include authors. For consistency, change source 46 to use RogerEbert.com like source 44. Remove format for source 48. Sources 59 and 74 should have authors and publication dates. Source 61 should have an author and website name. The archived link for source 67 is incorrect. The author of source 70 is Ryan Adams, not Ryan Adam. For consistency, use last and first parameters for source 73. The information in source 93 seems to describe a different article than what is linked. Source 97 should have a publication date. Source 104 doesn't need to name the International Press Academy twice. As a general note from my personal experience with similar lists, generally |publisher= is used for web sources that come from awards organizations directly, while |work= or |website= are used for citations that come from magazines, outside websites, etc. Let me clarify with some examples – source 8 is from the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, which is the awarding organization, so it should use |publisher=. On the other hand, source 5 is from E!, which is an outside source, so it should use |work= or |website=. — RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Other notes Wikilink Golden Globe Award for Best Actor – Motion Picture Drama in lead Remove commas before sources 5, 16, and 25 Change Phoenix appeared in biographical drama to Phoenix appeared in the biographical drama Change Her and he received widespread critical acclaim to Her and received widespread critical acclaim (or add a comma to make it a proper compound sentence) Change he appeared in psychological thriller to he appeared in the psychological thriller Many awards are not in alphabetical order; I would list all of them, but there's too many to do that easily. For consistency, I think you should put "Awards" after each group – so, for example, it would say Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts Awards instead of just Australian Academy of Cinema and Television Arts. You could list his 2005 nomination from the DFWFCA as 4th place if you wanted. — RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:35, 20 October 2020 (UTC) RunningTiger123, I believe that I have addressed your comments. Thanks for the very detailed review! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:55, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Source review passed, and I am now happy to support this nomination. RunningTiger123 (talk) 14:26, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

• Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.